Pharmacodynamic assessment of platelet inhibition by prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial

Residual platelet reactivity, bleedings, and adherence to treatment in patients having coronary stent implantation treated with prasugrel

Recent guidelines have recommended the use of aspirin and prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, prasugrel use has been evaluated only in randomized trials. This study sought to evaluate bleeding rates and adherence to treatment in "real-world" patients treated with prasugrel. In total 298 consecutive patients 68 ± 10 years old (31% >75 years old) underwent stent implantation and received prasugrel therapy. Indications to prasugrel therapy were (1) ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (41%), (2) drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetics (24%), (3) stent thrombosis (3%), (4) left main coronary artery drug-eluting stent implantation (6%), and (5) percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with high residual platelet reactivity on clopidogrel therapy (26%). All patients received a loading of prasugrel 60 mg. Patients ≥75 years old and with body weight ≤60 kg received a maintenance dose of 5 mg/day (10 mg/day for all the other patients). Follow-up data including adherence to prasugrel therapy were collected by telephone interviews or outpatient visits. Minimal follow-up length was 6 months (mean 9 ± 3). Major, minor, and minimal bleedings (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction criteria) occurred in 2.7%, 4.7%, and 15.1% of enrolled patients. Low residual platelet reactivity (p = 0.001) and female gender (p = 0.29) were independent predictors of bleeding events. The most frequent minimal bleeding event was epistaxis. Only 8 patients (2.7%) permanently discontinued prasugrel therapy because of bleeding events (n = 4), possible side effects (n = 2), or medical decisions not associated with bleeding or side effects (n = 2). Fourteen patients (4.7%) temporarily discontinued prasugrel (average 6.5 days) mainly because of surgical procedures. No definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred, although 3 patients develop de novo myocardial infarction and 1 an ischemic stroke. There were 11 deaths because of heart failure or refractory cardiogenic shock in 9, pulmonary embolism in 1, and cancer in 1. In conclusion, in clinical practice, major and minor bleeding event rates associated with prasugrel therapy are comparable to those reported in controlled randomized trials. The minimal bleeding event rate is higher than reported but does not seem to affect adherence to treatment.

The role of laboratory monitoring in antiplatelet therapy

In the last decade, several studies reported a high inter-individual variability in the pharmacological response to antiplatelet drugs. Suboptimal response to aspirin, as determined by specific tests (serum thromboxane B(2)), is rare and, when present, it appears to be caused by poor compliance in most instances. In contrast, studies that used specific tests to measure the pharmacological effect of clopidogrel showed a wide variability of response, with about 1/3 of treated subjects who are very poor responders. Inter-individual difference in the extent of metabolism of clopidogrel to its active metabolite by cytochrome P450 isoforms is the most relevant cause of the observed inter-individual variability in platelet inhibition. Tailored treatment based on laboratory monitoring of platelet function has been proposed as a solution to poor responsiveness to clopidogrel. However, we still need to identify the ideal laboratory test and to answer basic questions on its clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, before monitoring clopidogrel therapy can be recommended in clinical practice.

Inter-patient variability and impact of proton pump inhibitors on platelet reactivity after prasugrel

Although there is considerable variability of platelet reactivity among patients treated with clopidogrel, little is known about inter-individual differences and possible role of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) after prasugrel. We defined the extent of inter-patient variability, and evaluated the impact of PPI interaction in prasugrel-treated patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Between January 2010 and May 2011, 104 prospective, high-risk patients with ACS were recruited into this multicentre, prospective, observational study. Twelve to 24 hours after receiving 60 mg loading dose of prasugrel, light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate) were used to assess platelet activity. Platelet function measurements were repeated during maintenance phase on reduced (5 mg) or on conventional (10 mg) doses of prasugrel. High platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined according to the consensus document of the Working Group on High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity (LTA:>46%; Multiplate:>47U). Compared to maintenance doses, 60 mg loading dose of prasugrel provided significantly greater platelet reactivity inhibition (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the conventional and reduced maintenance doses. Notably, a remarkable inter-patient variability was present in platelet reactivity after all doses of prasugrel, and the prevalence of HPR was significantly higher during the maintenance doses (p<0.05). Although median platelet reactivity values were consistently higher when prasugrel was used in combination with PPIs, these differences were not significant (p≥0.17). Despite potent platelet inhibition, inter-patient variability is present after all tested doses of prasugrel. The 60 mg loading dose is superior to conventional and reduced maintenance doses in terms of platelet reactivity inhibition and regarding the prevention of HPR.

Beyond aspirin and clopidogrel: is there a need for additional antiplatelet therapy in ACS?

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is a well-established standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Whether there are other drug strategies or therapies that will achieve fewer ischemic events, and at the same time be associated with fewer bleeding complications, is a question recurrently asked. Finding the appropriate pharmacologic calibration of antiplatelet potency and applying such a pharmacodynamic effect to all patients has only been partially successful. The shadow of this one-size-fits-all dilemma is now being recast with the arrival of newer antiplatelet agents, which are attempting to decouple antithrombotic potency from bleeding liability. Novel antiplatelet agents that act faster and have more consistent pharmacokinetics and higher potency are steadily emerging. Additionally, newer agents that target unique sites, such as the thrombin receptor on platelets, are being studied in large-scale clinical trials. Each of these new agents has the potential to extend net clinical benefits beyond those provided by aspirin and clopidogrel.

Role of antiplatelet therapy in secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome

Cardiovascular disease is one of the major causes of death in developed countries, mainly related to coronary artery disease and its acute complications. Platelets play a great role in the pathogenesis of acute thrombotic events of coronary artery disease when silent chronic disease becomes acutely symptomatic. Platelet importance in coronary artery disease and pathophysiology of acute events support the large benefit of antiplatelet agents for both acute management of ACS and secondary prevention. Recent developments in oral antiplatelet therapy raised questions about the choice of the molecules, the use of single or double therapy, and the optimal dosing and duration of treatment. The present review aims to provide a current appraisal of antiplatelet therapy use after ACS and to summarize available scientific evidence for an optimal use of antiplatelet agents in daily practice, including the new P2Y12 blockers.

Emerging therapies for acute coronary syndromes

In the majority of cases acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are caused by activation and aggregation of platelets and subsequent thrombus formation leading to a decrease in coronary artery blood flow. Recent focus on the treatment of ACS has centered on reducing the response of platelets to vascular injury as well as inhibiting fibrin deposition. Novel therapies include more effective P2Y12 receptor blockers thereby reducing inter-individual variability, targeting the platelet thrombin receptor (protease activated receptor 1) as well as directly inhibiting factor Xa or thrombin activity. In this review we discuss the clinical data evaluating the effectiveness of these various new ACS treatment options.

High on treatment platelet reactivity

The addition of clopidogrel to aspirin for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) had significantly reduced cardiovascular events. However, despite dual antiplatelet therapy ischaemic events still occur, especially stent thrombosis, which is associated with a high mortality rate. Inter-individual response to clopidogrel is highly variable. It was shown that 4-46% could be considered as high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). Recent studies had demonstrated a relationship between HTPR and ischaemic events in the setting of PCI. Actually the assessment of platelet reactivity in routine practice and its interpretation to make a decision is a debatable issue.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity after prasugrel loading dose and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between platelet reactivity (PR) after a loading dose (LD) of prasugrel and thrombotic events.

BACKGROUND

Post-treatment PR has been shown to be strongly associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the clopidogrel era. Prasugrel is a new P2Y(12)-adenosine diphosphate receptor with a higher potency on PR.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter study included patients who underwent successful PCI for acute coronary syndromes and received prasugrel therapy. Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) index was measured after the prasugrel LD. High on-treatment PR was defined as a VASP index ≥50%. MACE included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and definite stent thrombosis at 1 month.

RESULTS

Three hundred one patients were enrolled. The mean VASP index after 60 mg of prasugrel was 34.3 ± 23.1%. High on-treatment PR was observed in 76 patients (25.2%). Patients experiencing thrombotic events after PCI had significantly higher VASP indexes compared with those free of events (64.4 ± 14.4% vs. 33.4 ± 22.7%; range: 51% to 64% and 5% to 47.6%, respectively; p = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing good responders and patients with high on-treatment PR demonstrated a significantly higher rate of MACE in patients with suboptimal PR inhibition (log-rank p < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis found a cutoff value of 53.5% of the VASP index to predict thrombotic events at 1 month (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). Patients with minor or major Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction unrelated to coronary artery bypass grafting bleeding and those without had similar VASP indexes (30 ± 17.8% vs. 34.3 ± 23%, p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of prasugrel, a significant number of patients undergoing PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndromes do not achieve optimal PR inhibition. Such patients have a higher risk for MACE after PCI.

The future of platelet function testing to guide therapy in clopidogrel low and enhanced responders

Dual oral antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is the therapy of choice in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in patients undergoing coronary stent placement to lower the risk of thrombotic events. Responsiveness to aspirin and especially to clopidogrel is not uniform and is subject to considerable interindividual variability. Furthermore, there is a broad consensus that clopidogrel low response or so-called high on-treatment platelet reactivity is linked to the occurrence of ischemic events. On the other hand, evidence is accumulating that enhanced clopidogrel responders are at increased risk of bleeding. Newer antiplatelet drugs, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, are more potent and produce more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation via the P2Y(12) ADP platelet receptor. A variety of methods of platelet function testing are available for evaluating platelet inhibition in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated patients in order to help determine the individual risk for ischemic and bleeding complications. Although not yet routinely undertaken, platelet function testing offers the potential to tailor antiplatelet therapy for individual patients. Whether alteration of therapy based on platelet function testing improves patients' outcomes remains unclear and is currently under investigation. This article reviews the impact of antiplatelet drug responsiveness on clinical outcomes with a focus on P2Y(12) receptor inhibition as well as on current and future concepts for personalized antiplatelet strategies.

Prasugrel overcomes high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity post-stenting more effectively than high-dose (150-mg) clopidogrel: the importance of CYP2C19*2 genotyping

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of the study was to determine the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel versus high-dose clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and, secondarily, their relation to cytochrome (CYP) 2C19*2 carriage.

BACKGROUND

High on-treatment platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration after PCI is linked to the loss-of-function CYP2C19*2 allele and accompanied by an increased risk of adverse events.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, randomized, single-blind, crossover study of platelet inhibition by prasugrel 10 mg/day versus high-dose 150 mg/day clopidogrel in 71 (of 210 screened; 33.8%) post-PCI patients with HTPR. Platelet function was assessed by the VerifyNow assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California), and real-time polymerase chain reaction genotyping was performed for CYP2C19*2 carriage.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint of platelet reactivity (measured in platelet reactivity units) at the end of the 2 treatment periods was lower after prasugrel compared with clopidogrel (least-squares estimates 129.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 111.1 to 147.7 versus 201.7, 95% CI: 183.2 to 220.2; p < 0.001). The least-squares mean difference between the 2 treatments was -122.9 (95% CI: -166.7 to -79.2, p < 0.001), and -47.5 (95% CI: -79.5 to -15.4, p = 0.004), in carriers and noncarriers of at least 1 mutant allele, respectively. The HTPR rates were lower for prasugrel than for clopidogrel, in all patients (7.5% vs. 35.8%, p < 0.001), in carriers (5.3% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.007), and in noncarriers (8.8% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.005), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HTPR after PCI, prasugrel is more effective compared with high clopidogrel in reducing platelet reactivity, particularly in CYP2C19*2 carriers. Genotyping guidance might be helpful only in case an increased clopidogrel maintenance dose is considered. (Prasugrel Versus High Dose Clopidogrel in Clopidogrel Resistant Patients Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI); NCT01109784).

Genotypic and phenotypic assessment of platelet function and response to P2Y12 antagonists

The P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonists are the cornerstone of oral antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease, especially after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Currently, the therapeutic agents available to block the receptor include clopidogrel and prasugrel; ticagrelor is not available everywhere. Clopidogrel was the gold standard, but recently it has been challenged by prasugrel and ticagrelor. One pitfall of clopidogrel is that in some patients it cannot induce optimal platelet reactivity inhibition in connection with several factors, including some genetic polymorphisms of enzymes participating in its bioabsorption or metabolism. This variability of response can be evaluated by platelet reactivity monitoring. This comprehensive review provides the available data regarding the genotypic and phenotypic interaction with the response to P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonists and discusses the concept of personalized antiplatelet therapy based on a genotypic or phenotypic profile.

Prasugrel resistance: fact or fiction

Prasugrel is a third-generation thienopyridine that inhibits ADP-induced platelet activation by irreversibly blocking the P2Y12 receptor. Given in healthy volunteers in dosages used clinically, it invariably inhibits platelet aggregation. When administered in patients, it has been shown to result in a faster, more consistent and stronger inhibition of platelet aggregation compared with the most widely used clopidogrel. However, cases of inadequate platelet inhibition or of the so-called 'resistance' to prasugrel have been occasionally reported. The focus of this review is prasugrel resistance prevalence, mechanisms and potential clinical implications.

Ticagrelor inhibits adenosine uptake in vitro and enhances adenosine-mediated hyperemia responses in a canine model

AIMS

A routine secondary pharmacology screen indicated that reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist ticagrelor could inhibit adenosine uptake in human erythrocytes, suggesting that ticagrelor may potentiate adenosine-mediated responses in vivo. The aim of this study was to further characterize the adenosine uptake inhibition in vitro and study possible physiological consequences of adenosine uptake inhibition by ticagrelor in an anesthetized dog model of coronary blood flow compared to dipyridamole.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured [2-3H]adenosine uptake in purified human erythrocytes and several cell lines in the presence of ticagrelor or the known uptake inhibitor dipyridamole as a comparator. Using an open-chest dog model (beagles), we measured the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery blood flow during reactive hyperemia after 1 minute occlusion or intracoronary infusion of adenosine before and after administration of vehicle, ticagrelor, or dipyridamole (each n = 8). Ticagrelor concentration-dependently inhibited adenosine uptake in human erythrocytes and in cell lines of rat, canine, or human origin. In the dog model, ticagrelor and dipyridamole dose-dependently augmented reactive hyperemia after LAD occlusion, as assessed by percentage repayment of flow debt relative to control (both Ps < .05). Ticagrelor and dipyridamole also dose-dependently augmented intracoronary adenosine-induced increases in LAD blood flow relative to control (both Ps < .05).

CONCLUSION

Ticagrelor inhibits adenosine uptake in vitro and subsequently augments cardiac blood flow in a canine model of reactive hypoxia- or adenosine-induced blood flow increases. These findings suggest that ticagrelor may have additional benefits in patients with acute coronary syndrome beyond inhibition of platelet aggregation.

Clinical evidence of interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors

Clopidogrel is approved for reduction of atherothrombotic events in patients with cardiovascular (CV) and cerebrovascular disease. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel decreases the risk of major adverse cardiac events after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention, compared with aspirin alone. Due to concern about gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who are receiving clopidogrel and aspirin therapy, current guidelines recommend combined use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to decrease the risk of bleeding. Data from previous pharmacological studies have shown that PPIs, which are extensively metabolized by the cytochrome system, may decrease the ADP-induced platelet aggregation of clopidogrel. Results from retrospective cohort studies have shown a higher incidence of major CV events in patients receiving both clopidogrel and PPIs than in those without PPIs. However, other retrospective analyses of randomized clinical trials have not shown that the concomitant PPI administration is associated with increased CV events among clopidogrel users. These controversial results suggest that large specific studies are needed. This article reviews the metabolism of clopidogrel and PPIs, existing clinical data regarding the interaction between clopidogrel and PPIs, and tries to provide recommendations for health care professionals.

Antiplatelet drug therapy: role of pharmacodynamic and genetic testing

Antiplatelet therapy represents the cornerstone of treatment for the short- and long-term prevention of atherothrombotic disease processes, in particular in high-risk settings such as in patients with acute coronary syndrome and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Currently, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel represents the most commonly used treatment regimen in these settings. However, a considerable number of patients continue to experience adverse outcomes, including both bleeding and recurrent ischemic events. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that this phenomenon may be, in part, attributed to the broad variability in individual response profiles to this standard antiplatelet treatment regimen, as identified by various assays of platelet function testing. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that genetic polymorphisms may also have an important role in determining levels of platelet inhibition and may be considered as a tool to identify patients at risk of adverse events. This article provides an overview on antiplatelet drug response variability, an update on definitions, including the role of pharmacodynamic testing, underlying mechanisms – with emphasis on recent understandings on pharmacogenetics and drug–drug interactions – and current and future perspectives on individualized antiplatelet therapy.

[Myocardial infarction: Role of new antiplatelet agents]

Thienopyridines have become the cornerstone of treatment of percutaneous coronary intervention although no survival benefit has ever been shown with clopidogrel despite increasing loading doses. Newly developed P2Y(12) inhibitors are more potent, more predictable and have a faster onset of action than clopidogrel, characteristics that make them particularly attractive for high-risk PCI. Four new P2Y(12) inhibitors have been tested each of them having particular individual properties. Prasugrel is an oral prodrug leading to irreversible blockade of the P2Y(12) receptor and is approved worldwide for ACS PCI. Ticagrelor is a direct-acting and reversible inhibitor of the P2Y(12) receptor with potentially more pleiotropic effects. Cangrelor is an intravenous direct and reversible inhibitor of the P2Y(12) receptor providing the highest level of inhibition and elinogrel is an intravenous and oral P2Y(12) antagonist with a direct and reversible action. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor, opposed to clopidogrel, have shown that stronger P2Y(12) inhibition led respectively to significant 19 % and 16 % relative risk reduction of a similar primary endpoint combining cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Both drugs showed a significant 0.6 % absolute excess of TIMI major bleeding not related to CABG surgery. The effect of these new compounds is prompt, predictable and powerful as compared to clopidogrel. Their net benefit is particularly marked in PCI for STEMI patients, in which there is no significant increase in major bleeding when compared with clopidogrel. However, because in clinical trials patients perceived to be at higher risk for bleeding usually are excluded, the risk of major and even fatal bleeding might even be higher in a "real-world" setting i.e. in the elderly patient with comorbidities.

A comparison of prasugrel at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention or as pretreatment at the time of diagnosis in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: design and rationale for the ACCOAST study

BACKGROUND

The precise risk/benefit of thienopyridine pretreatment and the optimal dosage and timing of a thienopyridine loading dose (LD) for patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes are still being debated. Prasugrel, a novel thienopyridine, is an appropriate drug to address this issue as it provides predictably high and rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation.

STUDY DESIGN

ACCOAST is a phase 3, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, and event-driven study designed to compare 2 prasugrel LD schedules in patients with NSTE myocardial infarction who are scheduled for coronary angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Approximately 4,100 patients will be randomly assigned to an initial LD of 30 mg of prasugrel after the diagnosis followed by coronary angiography with an additional dose of 30 mg of prasugrel given at the time of PCI (pretreatment) or an LD of 60 mg of prasugrel given to patients undergoing PCI at the time of the procedure (non-pretreatment). All patients undergoing PCI will receive 5 or 10 mg of prasugrel daily. The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that prasugrel pretreatment is superior to prasugrel non-pretreatment as measured by a reduction in the composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent revascularization, or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor bailout through 7 days from randomization. Key safety end points include TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) major and minor bleeding risks.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACCOAST study will provide important evidence with regard to the benefits and risks of prasugrel pretreatment compared with administration of prasugrel at the time of PCI in patients with NSTE myocardial infarction.

Advances in antiplatelet therapy

Because of the central role of platelets in cardiovascular atherothrombosis, there is a well-established therapeutic role for antiplatelet therapy that includes aspirin (a cyclooxygenase 1 [COX1] inhibitor), clopidogrel (an antagonist of the ADP P2Y(12) receptor), and the GPIIb-GPIIIa (αIIbβ3) antagonists. However, there remains a significant incidence of arterial thrombosis in patients treated with currently available antiplatelet therapy. Novel P2Y(12) antagonists such as the recently US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved prasugrel, along with ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel, have advantages over clopidogrel, including more rapid, less variable, and more complete inhibition of platelet function. Currently ongoing phase 3 studies will determine whether these new P2Y(12) antagonists will result in better and/or more rapid antithrombotic effects than clopidogrel, without an unacceptable increase in hemorrhagic or other side effects, as has been recently reported in some clinical settings for prasugrel and ticagrelor. Antagonists of the thrombin receptor protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) are also undergoing phase 3 trials, and many other novel antiplatelet agents are under investigation as antithrombotic agents.

Antiplatelet drug interactions

Both laboratory studies in healthy volunteers and clinical studies have suggested adverse interactions between antiplatelet drugs and other commonly used medications. Interactions described include those between aspirin and ibuprofen, aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the thienopyridine, clopidogrel, and drugs inhibiting CYP2C19, notably the proton pump inhibitors (PPI) omeprazole and esomeprazole. Other interactions between thienopyridines and CYP3A4/5 have also been reported for statins and calcium channel blockers. The ibuprofen/aspirin interaction is thought to be caused by ibuprofen blocking the access of aspirin to platelet cyclo-oxygenase. The thienopyridine interactions are caused by inhibition of microsomal enzymes that metabolize these pro-drugs to their active metabolites. We review the evidence for these interactions, assess their clinical importance and suggest strategies of how to deal with them in clinical practice. We conclude that ibuprofen is likely to interact with aspirin and reduce its anti-platelet action particularly in those patients who take ibuprofen chronically. This interaction is of greater relevance to those patients at high cardiovascular risk. A sensible strategy is to advise users of aspirin to avoid chronic ibuprofen or to ingest aspirin at least 2 h prior to ibuprofen. Clearly the use of NSAIDs that do not interact in this way is preferred. For the clopidogrel CYP2C19 and CYP3A4/5 interactions, there is good evidence that these interactions occur. However, there is less good evidence to support the clinical importance of these interactions. Again, a reasonable strategy is to avoid the chronic use of drugs that inhibit CYP2C19, notably PPIs, in subjects taking clopidogrel and use high dose H2 antagonists instead. Finally, anti-platelet agents probably interact with other drugs that affect platelet function such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and clinicians should probably judge patients taking such combination therapies as at high risk for bleeding.

A protein phosphorylation-based assay for screening and monitoring of drugs modulating cyclic nucleotide pathways

Cyclic nucleotide regulation is an important target for drug development, particularly for treatment and prophylaxis of cardiovascular diseases. Determination of cyclic nucleotide levels for screening and monitoring of cyclic nucleotide modulating drug action is necessary, yet the techniques available are cumbersome and not sufficiently accurate. Here we present an approach based on the detection of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein phosphorylation. By use of a common substrate of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases, the protein vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) featuring two phosphorylation sites specifically phosphorylated by these kinases, an assay was developed for the monitoring of intracellular cyclic nucleotide levels. The assay was tested with human platelets ex vivo treated with stimulants of nucleotide cyclases, kinases, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Phosphorylation of the protein VASP correlates with intracellular cyclic nucleotide concentration (R(2)>0.90 for cGMP and cAMP); however, VASP phosphorylation is more sensitive to elevated cyclic nucleotide levels and significantly more stable over time. Quantification of VASP phosphorylation offers a reliable and robust tool for fast and easy monitoring of cyclic nucleotide levels and is also applicable to unprocessed biological matrices. Owing to these properties, VASP is a promising biomarker for screening and monitoring of cyclic nucleotide modulating drugs.

Our expanding view of platelet functions and its clinical implications

Platelets are the primary cell mediator of thrombosis. A deficiency of platelets can result in severe bleeding defects. "Overactive" platelets contribute to life-threatening outcomes in diseases such as heart attack, stroke, and cancer. The use of platelet inhibitors for thrombosis prevention must therefore seek a delicate balance between inhibiting platelet activation and an associated increased bleeding risk. There are currently few platelet inhibitors clinically available, making the search for novel anti-platelet drug targets a major research priority. Several newly identified pathways of platelet activation may hold hope in this area. In addition, important roles for platelets beyond hemostasis have been discovered. Platelets have recently been described as mediators of diverse inflammatory diseases such as arthritis, hepatitis, malaria, and atherosclerosis. This has heightened the need to broaden our understanding of platelet functions and platelet-derived inflammatory mediators. It has also heightened interest in a continued search for new platelet inhibitors and presents new opportunities for platelet inhibitors to be used in a wide array of disease treatment strategies.

Slow response to clopidogrel predicts low response

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the speed of response to clopidogrel loading predicts the final degree of response.

BACKGROUND

Fast inhibition of platelet aggregation is important in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention, but its association with the final degree of inhibition is not well established.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of the ALBION study; early kinetic profiles of adenosine diphosphate 20 micromol/l maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) and DeltaMPA (with baseline sample as reference) were studied at 8 time points within the 24 h after clopidogrel loading (300, 600, or 900 mg) in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Low response was defined as DeltaMPA <10% over the first 24 h, fast response as DeltaMPA > or =10% at 1 h or before loading (the others being slow responders), and high post-treatment platelet reactivity as MPA > or =56.56% (fourth quartile). Inflammatory markers (PAC-1 and P-selectin) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) were also evaluated according to onset of action.

RESULTS

Fifty-five percent of patients were slow responders. Noncurrent smoking and body mass index > or =25 kg/m(2) were associated with slower and lower responses. High post-treatment platelet reactivity was more frequent in slow responders (28% vs. 14%, p < 0.0001). There was a clopidogrel dose-effect relationship on DeltaMPA, with a trend toward faster onset of platelet inhibition in the 900-mg loading dose group. Slow responders had a slower and lower decrease in PAC-1 and P-selectin and higher VASP index at 6 h (76.5% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.019) and 24 h (70.3% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Slow response to clopidogrel, within the first hour of administration, is a reliable marker of low response at 24 h and high post-treatment platelet reactivity.

Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study

BACKGROUND

The antiplatelet effects of the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial dose of ticagrelor in patients nonresponsive to clopidogrel and after they switch agents are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with stable coronary artery disease on aspirin therapy received a 300-mg clopidogrel load; nonresponders were identified by light transmittance aggregometry. In a 2-way crossover design, nonresponders (n=41) and responders (n=57) randomly received clopidogrel (600 mg/75 mg once daily) or ticagrelor (180 mg/90 mg twice daily) for 14 days during period 1. In period 2, all nonresponders switched treatment; half of the responders continued the same treatment, whereas the others switched treatment. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was higher in nonresponders treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (P<0.05). Treatment with ticagrelor among nonresponders resulted in a >10%, >30%, and >50% decrease in platelet aggregation from baseline in 100%, 75%, and 13% of patients, respectively. Platelet aggregation fell from 59+/-9% to 35+/-11% in patients switched from clopidogrel to ticagrelor and increased from 36+/-14% to 56+/-9% in patients switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel (P<0.0001 for both). Platelet reactivity was below the cut points previously associated with ischemic risk measured by light transmittance aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y(12) assay, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation in 98% to 100% of patients after ticagrelor therapy versus 44% to 76% of patients after clopidogrel therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ticagrelor therapy overcomes nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel, and its antiplatelet effect is the same in responders and nonresponders. Nearly all clopidogrel nonresponders and responders treated with ticagrelor will have platelet reactivity below the cut points associated with ischemic risk. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00642811.

Prasugrel

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing inservices. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent in print and are also available online. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The January 2010 monograph topics are peramivir, pazopanib, ofatumumab, guanfacine extended-release tablets, and C1 esterase inhibitor (human). The DUE is on peramivir.

Association of cyclooxygenase-1-dependent and -independent platelet function assays with adverse clinical outcomes in aspirin-treated patients presenting for cardiac catheterization

BACKGROUND

Poor clinical outcome in aspirin-treated patients has been termed aspirin resistance and may result from inadequate inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) by aspirin. The objectives of this study were to determine prospectively whether COX-1-dependent and other platelet function assays correlate with clinical outcomes in aspirin-treated patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Blood was collected before percutaneous coronary intervention from 700 consecutive aspirin-treated (81 or 325 mg for > or =3 days) patients. Platelet function was tested by (1) serum thromboxane B(2); (2) arachidonic acid-stimulated platelet surface P-selectin and activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa and leukocyte-platelet aggregates; and (3) platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 collagen-epinephrine and collagen-ADP closure time (CT). Adverse clinical outcomes of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for revascularization, or acute coronary syndrome) were assessed by telephone interview and/or medical record review. Clinical outcomes information was obtained at 24.8+/-0.3 months after platelet function testing. By univariate analysis, COX-1-dependent assays, including serum thromboxane B(2) level, were not associated with adverse clinical outcomes, whereas the COX-1-independent assay, PFA-100 collagen-ADP CT <65 seconds, was associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (P=0.0149). After adjustment for covariables (including sex, aspirin dose, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score, clopidogrel use), both serum thromboxane B(2) >3.1 ng/mL and PFA-100 collagen-ADP CT <65 seconds were associated with major adverse cardiovascular events. In contrast, indirect measures of platelet COX-1 (arachidonic acid-stimulated platelet markers, shortened PFA-100 collagen-epinephrine CT) were not significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes even after adjustment for covariables.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study of 700 aspirin-treated patients presenting for angiographic evaluation of coronary artery disease, residual platelet COX-1 function measured by serum thromboxane B(2) and COX-1-independent platelet function measured by PFA-100 collagen-ADP CT, but not indirect COX-1-dependent assays (arachidonic acid-stimulated platelet markers, shortened PFA-100 collagen-epinephrine CT), correlate with subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events. This study suggests that multiple mechanisms, including but not confined to inadequate inhibition of COX-1, are responsible for poor clinical outcomes in aspirin-treated patients, and therefore the term aspirin resistance is inappropriate.