151
|
Kurian AW, Antoniou AC, Domchek SM. Refining Breast Cancer Risk Stratification: Additional Genes, Additional Information. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016; 35:44-56. [PMID: 27249685 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_158817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in genomic technology have enabled far more rapid, less expensive sequencing of multiple genes than was possible only a few years ago. Advances in bioinformatics also facilitate the interpretation of large amounts of genomic data. New strategies for cancer genetic risk assessment include multiplex sequencing panels of 5 to more than 100 genes (in which rare mutations are often associated with at least two times the average risk of developing breast cancer) and panels of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), combinations of which are generally associated with more modest cancer risks (more than twofold). Although these new multiple-gene panel tests are used in oncology practice, questions remain about the clinical validity and the clinical utility of their results. To translate this increasingly complex genetic information for clinical use, cancer risk prediction tools are under development that consider the joint effects of all susceptibility genes, together with other established breast cancer risk factors. Risk-adapted screening and prevention protocols are underway, with ongoing refinement as genetic knowledge grows. Priority areas for future research include the clinical validity and clinical utility of emerging genetic tests; the accuracy of developing cancer risk prediction models; and the long-term outcomes of risk-adapted screening and prevention protocols, in terms of patients' experiences and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison W Kurian
- From the Departments of Medicine and of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- From the Departments of Medicine and of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- From the Departments of Medicine and of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Basser Research Center and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trabectedin is an anti-tumor compound registered in Europe and in several other countries, for the second-line treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and for ovarian cancer in combination with liposomal doxorubicin. Trabectedin inhibits cancer cell proliferation mainly affecting the transcription regulation. Trabectedin also acts as a modulator of tumor microenvironment by reducing the number of tumor associated macrophages (TAM). Because of its unique mechanism of action, trabectedin has the potential to act as antineoplastic agent also in several solid malignancies, including breast cancer (BC). AREAS COVERED This article reviews the preclinical and clinical data of trabectedin focusing on development in metastatic BC (mBC). Comments regarding the nature and the results of these trials are included. EXPERT OPINION Trabectedin is thought to have a crucial activity with defective DNA-repair machinery and also in modulating the tumor micro-environment and the immune-system of cancer patients. From the current available data, we recognize a potential activity of trabectedin in mBC and support the renewed efforts to better elucidate the value of trabectedin in this indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio D'Incalci
- a Department of Oncology , IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri , Via La Masa 19, Milan 20156 , Italy
| | - Alberto Zambelli
- b Medical Oncology , Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital , P.zza OMS 1, Bergamo 24127 , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Ademuyiwa FO, Cyr A, Ivanovich J, Thomas MA. Managing breast cancer in younger women: challenges and solutions. BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2015; 8:1-12. [PMID: 26730210 PMCID: PMC4694614 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s68848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer in young women is relatively rare compared to breast cancer occurring in older women. Younger women diagnosed with breast cancer also tend to have a more aggressive biology and consequently a poorer prognosis than older women. In addition, they face unique challenges such as diminished fertility from premature ovarian failure, extended survivorship periods and its attendant problems, and the psychosocial impact of diagnosis, while still raising families. It is therefore imperative to recognize the unique issues that younger women face, and plan management in a multidisciplinary fashion to optimize clinical outcomes. This paper discusses the challenges of breast cancer management for young women, as well as specific issues to consider in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Foluso O Ademuyiwa
- Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Amy Cyr
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jennifer Ivanovich
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Maria A Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Liu S, Meric-Bernstam F, Parinyanitikul N, Wang B, Eterovic AK, Zheng X, Gagea M, Chavez-MacGregor M, Ueno NT, Lei X, Zhou W, Nair L, Tripathy D, Brown PH, Hortobagyi GN, Chen K, Mendelsohn J, Mills GB, Gonzalez-Angulo AM. Functional consequence of the MET-T1010I polymorphism in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2015; 6:2604-14. [PMID: 25605252 PMCID: PMC4413604 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2014] [Accepted: 12/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Major breast cancer predisposition genes, only account for approximately 30% of high-risk breast cancer families and only explain 15% of breast cancer familial relative risk. The HGF growth factor receptor MET is potentially functionally altered due to an uncommon germline single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), MET-T1010I, in many cancer lineages including breast cancer where the MET-T1010I SNP is present in 2% of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Expression of MET-T1010I in the context of mammary epithelium increases colony formation, cell migration and invasion in-vitro and tumor growth and invasion in-vivo. A selective effect of MET-T1010I as compared to wild type MET on cell invasion both in-vitro and in-vivo suggests that the MET-T1010I SNP may alter tumor pathophysiology and should be considered as a potential biomarker when implementing MET targeted clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuying Liu
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Napa Parinyanitikul
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bailiang Wang
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Agda K Eterovic
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Zheng
- Department of Bioinformatics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mihai Gagea
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naoto T Ueno
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Section of Breast Cancer Translational Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wanding Zhou
- Department of Bioinformatics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lakshmy Nair
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debu Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Powel H Brown
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriel N Hortobagyi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ken Chen
- Department of Bioinformatics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Mendelsohn
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gordon B Mills
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Dutil J, Golubeva VA, Pacheco-Torres AL, Diaz-Zabala HJ, Matta JL, Monteiro AN. The spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 alleles in Latin America and the Caribbean: a clinical perspective. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 154:441-53. [PMID: 26564481 PMCID: PMC4661195 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3629-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hereditary cancer predisposition gene testing allows the identification of individuals at high risk of cancer that may benefit from increased surveillance, chemoprevention, and prophylactic surgery. In order to implement clinical genetic strategies adapted to each population's needs and intrinsic genetic characteristic, this review aims to present the current status of knowledge about the spectrum of BRCA pathogenic variants in Latin American populations. We have conducted a comprehensive review of 33 studies published between 1994 and 2015 reporting the prevalence and/or spectrum of BRCA1 (OMIM 113705) and BRCA2 (OMIM 600185) variants. The combined sample size for these studies consisted of 4835 individuals from 13 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, as well as in Hispanics in the United States. A total of 167 unique pathogenic variants have been reported in the existing literature. In unselected breast cancer cases, the prevalence ranged from 1.2 to 27.1%. Some countries presented a few recurrent pathogenic variants, while others were characterized by diverse, non-recurrent variants. The proportion of BRCA pathogenic variants shared between Hispanics in the United States and Latin American populations was estimated at 10.4%. Within Latin America and the Caribbean, 8.2% of the BRCA variants reported were present in more than one country. Countries with high prevalence of BRCA pathogenic variants may benefit from more aggressive testing strategies, while testing of recurrent variant panels might present a cost-effective solution for improving genetic testing in some, but not all, countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Dutil
- Ponce Research Institute, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, PR, USA.
| | - Volha A Golubeva
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Jaime L Matta
- Ponce Research Institute, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, PR, USA
| | - Alvaro N Monteiro
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Francies FZ, Wainstein T, De Leeneer K, Cairns A, Murdoch M, Nietz S, Cubasch H, Poppe B, Van Maerken T, Crombez B, Coene I, Kerr R, Slabbert JP, Vral A, Krause A, Baeyens A, Claes KBM. BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 mutations and CHEK2 c.1100delC in different South African ethnic groups diagnosed with premenopausal and/or triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:912. [PMID: 26577449 PMCID: PMC4647511 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1913-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current knowledge of the aetiology of hereditary breast cancer in the four main South African population groups (black, coloured, Indian and white) is limited. Risk assessments in the black, coloured and Indian population groups are challenging because of restricted information regarding the underlying genetic contributions to inherited breast cancer in these populations. We focused this study on premenopausal patients (diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 50; n = 78) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (n = 30) from the four South African ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and spectrum of germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 and to evaluate the presence of the CHEK2 c.1100delC allele in these patients. Methods In total, 108 South African breast cancer patients underwent mutation screening using a Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) approach in combination with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) to detect large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Results In 13 (12 %) patients a deleterious mutation in BRCA1/2 was detected, three of which were novel mutations in black patients. None of the study participants was found to have an unequivocal pathogenic mutation in PALB2. Two (white) patients tested positive for the CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation, however, one of these also carried a deleterious BRCA2 mutation. Additionally, six variants of unknown clinical significance were identified (4 in BRCA2, 2 in PALB2), all in black patients. Within the group of TNBC patients, a higher mutation frequency was obtained (23.3 %; 7/30) than in the group of patients diagnosed before the age of 50 (7.7 %; 6/78). Conclusion This study highlights the importance of evaluating germline mutations in major breast cancer genes in all of the South African population groups. This NGS study shows that mutation analysis is warranted in South African patients with triple negative and/or in premenopausal breast cancer. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1913-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Z Francies
- iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation, Somerset West, South Africa. .,Department of Radiation Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - T Wainstein
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - K De Leeneer
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - A Cairns
- Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - M Murdoch
- Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - S Nietz
- Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - H Cubasch
- Batho Pele Breast Unit, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - B Poppe
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - T Van Maerken
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - B Crombez
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - I Coene
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - R Kerr
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - J P Slabbert
- iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation, Somerset West, South Africa.
| | - A Vral
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - A Krause
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. .,Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - A Baeyens
- iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation, Somerset West, South Africa. .,Department of Radiation Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. .,Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - K B M Claes
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Yang RL, Mick R, Lee K, Graves HL, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, Kelz RR, Zhang PJ, Czerniecki BJ. DCIS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: prevalence, phenotype, and expression of oncodrivers C-MET and HER3. J Transl Med 2015; 13:335. [PMID: 26496879 PMCID: PMC4619378 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-015-0698-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Studies report conflicting evidence regarding the existence of a DCIS-associated premalignant pathway in BRCA mutation carriers. We aimed to examine the prevalence, phenotype, and expression of oncodrivers in pure DCIS (pDCIS) and invasive breast cancer with concurrent DCIS (IBC + DCIS) in mutation carriers. Methods A cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers >18 years old who underwent surgery for breast cancer at an academic hospital (1992–2011) and had pathology available for review were included for study. Invasive breast cancer (IBC) and DCIS were stained for ER, PR, HER1, HER2, and HER3, and C-MET. DCIS prevalence was evaluated. Correlation of IBC and DCIS phenotypes was evaluated in patients with IBC + DCIS. DCIS and IBC expression of tumor markers were examined by BRCA mutation. Results We identified 114 breast tumors. Of all BRCA1-associated tumors, 21.1 % were pDCIS and 63.4 % were IBC + DCIS. Of all BRCA2-associated tumors, 23.3 % were pDCIS and 60.5 % were IBC + DCIS. In BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with IBC + DCIS, there was a significant correlation in ER, PR, and HER3 expression between the DCIS and IBC components. Most BRCA1-associated DCIS did not express ER, PR or HER2, while most BRCA2-associated DCIS did express ER and PR. BRCA1− as well as BRCA2-associated DCIS had expression of HER3 and C-MET. Conclusions The majority of BRCA-associated tumors had DCIS present. Concordance of DCIS and IBC phenotypes was high, arguing for the existence of a DCIS-associated premalignant pathway. Oncodrivers HER3 and C-MET were expressed in the DCIS of mutation carriers, suggesting an opportunity for prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Yang
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Rosemarie Mick
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Kathreen Lee
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Holly L Graves
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Paul J Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Brian J Czerniecki
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Abramson Cancer Center, 3rd Floor West 3400 Civic Center, Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
158
|
The Activities and Impact of State Programs to Address Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2011-2014. Healthcare (Basel) 2015; 3:948-63. [PMID: 27417805 PMCID: PMC4934623 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare3040948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2015] [Revised: 09/25/2015] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2011, the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC), at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), released a three-year funding opportunity announcement (FOA) for a competitive, non-research cooperative agreement. The agreement enhanced the capacities of state health departments to promote the application of best practices for evidence-based breast cancer genomics through education, surveillance, and policy activities. The FOA required that applicants focus on activities related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). The DCPC funded three states: Georgia, Michigan, and Oregon. Georgia was a first-time recipient of cancer genomics funding, whereas Michigan and Oregon had long standing activities in cancer genomics and had received CDC funding in the past. By the end of the funding period, each state had well-functioning and impactful state-based programs in breast cancer genomics. This article highlights the impact of a few key state activities by using CDC's Science Impact Framework. There were challenges to implementing public health genomics programs, including the need to develop relevant partnerships, the highly technical nature of the subject matter, a lack of genetic services in certain areas, and the difficulty in funding genetic services. Georgia, Michigan, and Oregon have served as models for others interested in initiating or expanding cancer genomics programs, and they helped to determine what works well for promoting and integrating public health genomics into existing systems.
Collapse
|
159
|
Jobsen JJ, van der Palen J, Brinkhuis M, Ong F, Struikmans H. Long-term effects of first degree family history of breast cancer in young women: Recurrences and bilateral breast cancer. Acta Oncol 2015; 55:449-54. [PMID: 26399280 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1074281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of first degree relative (FDR) of young breast cancer patients. METHODS Data were used from our prospective population-based cohort study which started in 1983. The family history (FH) was registered with regard to FDR: the presence or absence of invasive breast cancer in none vs. one or more FDRs at any age. RESULTS A total of 1109 women, ≤50 years with 1128 breast conserving treatments was seen. The incidence of FDR was 17.0% for one FDR and 3.2% ≥2 FDR. The three groups, none, 1 or ≥2 FDR, were comparable. The local failure rate is comparable for all three groups. Women with a positive FH and metachronous bilateral breast cancer (MBBC) showed a lower local failure (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.05-0.8). A positive FH was an independent predictor for a better disease-specific survival (HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-0.9). CONCLUSION A positive FH, based on FDR implies a better prognosis in relation to survival for young women treated with BCT. In contrast to no FH for FDR, MBBC in women with a positive FH was not associated with an increased risk of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan J. Jobsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Job van der Palen
- Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Departement of Research Methodology, Measurement, and Data Analysis, Faculty of Behavioral Science, University of Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Mariël Brinkhuis
- Laboratory for Pathology Oost Nederland, Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - Francisca Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Struikmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands, and
- Radiotherapy Centre West, Medical Centre Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Eccles BK, Copson ER, Cutress RI, Maishman T, Altman DG, Simmonds P, Gerty SM, Durcan L, Stanton L, Eccles DM. Family history and outcome of young patients with breast cancer in the UK (POSH study). Br J Surg 2015; 102:924-35. [PMID: 25989914 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2014] [Revised: 11/03/2014] [Accepted: 03/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young patients presenting to surgical clinics with breast cancer are usually aware of their family history and frequently believe that a positive family history may adversely affect their prognosis. Tumour pathology and outcomes were compared in young British patients with breast cancer with and without a family history of breast cancer. METHODS Prospective Outcomes in Sporadic versus Hereditary breast cancer (POSH) is a large prospective cohort study of women aged less than 41 years with breast cancer diagnosed and treated in the UK using modern oncological management. Personal characteristics, tumour pathology, treatment and family history of breast/ovarian cancer were recorded. Follow-up data were collected annually. RESULTS Family history data were available for 2850 patients. No family history was reported by 65·9 per cent, and 34·1 per cent reported breast/ovarian cancer in at least one first- or second-degree relative. Patients with a family history were more likely to have grade 3 tumours (63·3 versus 58·9 per cent) and less likely to have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumours (24·7 versus 28·8 per cent) than those with no family history. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in distant disease-free intervals for patients with versus those without a family history, either for the whole cohort (hazard ratio (HR) 0·89, 95 per cent c.i. 0·76 to 1·03; P = 0·120) or when stratified by oestrogen receptor (ER) status (ER-negative: HR 0·80, 0·62 to 1·04, P = 0·101; ER-positive: HR 0·95, 0·78 to 1·15, P = 0·589). CONCLUSION Young British patients presenting to breast surgical clinics with a positive family history can be reassured that this is not a significant independent risk factor for breast cancer outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B K Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - E R Copson
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - R I Cutress
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - T Maishman
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - D G Altman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - P Simmonds
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - S M Gerty
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - L Durcan
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - L Stanton
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton
| | - D M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Erturk E, Cecener G, Polatkan V, Gokgoz S, Egeli U, Tunca B, Tezcan G, Demirdogen E, Ak S, Tasdelen I. Evaluation of genetic variations in miRNA-binding sites of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as risk factors for the development of early-onset and/or familial breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 15:8319-24. [PMID: 25339023 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.19.8319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Although genetic markers identifying women at an increased risk of developing breast cancer exist, the majority of inherited risk factors remain elusive. Mutations in the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene confer a substantial increase in breast cancer risk, yet routine clinical genetic screening is limited to the coding regions and intron- exon boundaries, precluding the identification of mutations in noncoding and untranslated regions. Because 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) polymorphisms disrupting microRNA (miRNA) binding can be functional and can act as genetic markers of cancer risk, we aimed to determine genetic variation in the 3'UTR of BRCA1/BRCA2 in familial and early-onset breast cancer patients with and without mutations in the coding regions of BRCA1/ BRCA2 and to identify specific 3'UTR variants that may be risk factors for cancer development. The 3'UTRs of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were screened by heteroduplex analysis and DNA sequencing in 100 patients from 46 BRCA1/2 families, 54 non-BRCA1/2 families, and 47 geographically matched controls. Two polymorphisms were identified. SNPs c.*1287C>T (rs12516) (BRCA1) and c.*105A>C (rs15869) (BRCA2) were identified in 27% and 24% of patients, respectively. These 2 variants were also identified in controls with no family history of cancer (23.4% and 23.4%, respectively). In comparison to variations in the 3'UTR region of the BRCA1/2 genes and the BRCA1/2 mutational status in patients, there was a statistically significant relationship between the BRCA1 gene polymorphism c.*1287C>T (rs12516) and BRCA1 mutations (p=0.035) by Fisher's Exact Test. SNP c.*1287C>T (rs12516) of the BRCA1 gene may have potential use as a genetic marker of an increased risk of developing breast cancer and likely represents a non-coding sequence variation in BRCA1 that impacts BRCA1 function and leads to increased early-onset and/or familial breast cancer risk in the Turkish population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elif Erturk
- Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
162
|
Wendt C, Lindblom A, Arver B, von Wachenfeldt A, Margolin S. Tumour spectrum in non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer families in Sweden. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2015; 13:15. [PMID: 26082817 PMCID: PMC4469256 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-015-0036-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 30 % of all breast cancer is at least partly attributed to hereditary factors. Familial breast cancer is often inherited in the context of cancer syndromes. The most commonly mutated genes are BRCA1 and BRCA2 in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. The genetic background in families with hereditary breast cancer without predisposing germ line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (non-BRCA families) is still to a large extent unclear even though progress has been made. The aim of this study was to compare cancer proportions in familial non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer compared to the general population in search of putative new breast cancer syndromes. METHODS Pedigrees from 334 non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer families in the county of Stockholm, Sweden, were investigated and the distribution of cancer diagnoses other than breast cancer was compared with the distribution of cancer diagnoses in the general Swedish population in two reference years, 1970 and 2010. A cancer diagnosis was regarded as overrepresented in the non-BRCA families if the confidence interval was above both population reference values. RESULTS We found that endometrial cancer was overrepresented in the non-BRCA families with a 6.36 % proportion (CI 4.67-8.2) compared to the proportion in the general population in the reference years 1970 (3.07 %) and 2010 (2.64 %). Moreover tumours of the ovary, liver, pancreas and prostate were overrepresented. CONCLUSION In conclusion, we found an overrepresentation of endometrial cancer in our cohort of hereditary non-BRCA families. Our result supports previous inconsistent reports of a putative breast and endometrial cancer syndrome. An association has been suggested in studies of families with several cases of breast cancer in close relatives or bilateral breast cancer. To clarify this issue we suggest further studies on a breast and endometrial cancer syndrome in cohorts with a strong pattern of hereditary breast cancer. Identifying new breast cancer syndromes is of importance to improve genetic counselling for women at risk and a first step towards detection of new susceptibility genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Wendt
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brita Arver
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna von Wachenfeldt
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Huo CW, Chew G, Hill P, Huang D, Ingman W, Hodson L, Brown KA, Magenau A, Allam AH, McGhee E, Timpson P, Henderson MA, Thompson EW, Britt K. High mammographic density is associated with an increase in stromal collagen and immune cells within the mammary epithelium. Breast Cancer Res 2015; 17:79. [PMID: 26040322 PMCID: PMC4485361 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0592-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mammographic density (MD), after adjustment for a women's age and body mass index, is a strong and independent risk factor for breast cancer (BC). Although the BC risk attributable to increased MD is significant in healthy women, the biological basis of high mammographic density (HMD) causation and how it raises BC risk remain elusive. We assessed the histological and immunohistochemical differences between matched HMD and low mammographic density (LMD) breast tissues from healthy women to define which cell features may mediate the increased MD and MD-associated BC risk. METHODS Tissues were obtained between 2008 and 2013 from 41 women undergoing prophylactic mastectomy because of their high BC risk profile. Tissue slices resected from the mastectomy specimens were X-rayed, then HMD and LMD regions were dissected based on radiological appearance. The histological composition, aromatase immunoreactivity, hormone receptor status and proliferation status were assessed, as were collagen amount and orientation, epithelial subsets and immune cell status. RESULTS HMD tissue had a significantly greater proportion of stroma, collagen and epithelium, as well as less fat, than LMD tissue did. Second harmonic generation imaging demonstrated more organised stromal collagen in HMD tissues than in LMD tissues. There was significantly more aromatase immunoreactivity in both the stromal and glandular regions of HMD tissues than in those regions of LMD tissues, although no significant differences in levels of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor or Ki-67 expression were detected. The number of macrophages within the epithelium or stroma did not change; however, HMD stroma exhibited less CD206(+) alternatively activated macrophages. Epithelial cell maturation was not altered in HMD samples, and no evidence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition was seen; however, there was a significant increase in vimentin(+)/CD45(+) immune cells within the epithelial layer in HMD tissues. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed increased proportions of stroma and epithelium, increased aromatase activity and no changes in hormone receptor or Ki-67 marker status in HMD tissue. The HMD region showed increased collagen deposition and organisation as well as decreased alternatively activated macrophages in the stroma. The HMD epithelium may be a site for local inflammation, as we observed a significant increase in CD45(+)/vimentin(+) immune cells in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia W Huo
- University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Level 2, Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
| | - Grace Chew
- University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Level 2, Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
| | - Prue Hill
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
| | - Dexing Huang
- St. Vincent's Institute, 9 Princes Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
| | - Wendy Ingman
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. .,Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Ground Floor, Norwich Centre, 55 King William Road, North Adelaide, SA, 5006, Australia.
| | - Leigh Hodson
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. .,Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Ground Floor, Norwich Centre, 55 King William Road, North Adelaide, SA, 5006, Australia.
| | - Kristy A Brown
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright Street, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
| | - Astrid Magenau
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Australia. .,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia. .,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Amr H Allam
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Australia. .,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia. .,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Ewan McGhee
- St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Paul Timpson
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Australia. .,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia. .,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Michael A Henderson
- University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Level 2, Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia. .,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 2 St. Andrews Place, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
| | - Erik W Thompson
- University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Level 2, Clinical Sciences Building, 29 Regent Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia. .,St. Vincent's Institute, 9 Princes Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia. .,Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
| | - Kara Britt
- The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Switchback Road, Bearsden Glasgow, G61 1BD, UK. .,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, St. Andrews Place, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia. .,Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, 19 Innovation Walk, Clayton, VIC, s, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
High prevalence of BRCA1 stop mutation c.4183C>T in the Tyrolean population: implications for genetic testing. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 24:258-62. [PMID: 26014432 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Revised: 04/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening for founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 has been discussed as a cost-effective testing strategy in certain populations. In this study, comprehensive BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing was performed in a routine diagnostic setting. The prevalence of the BRCA1 stop mutation c.4183C>T, p.(Gln1395Ter), was determined in unselected breast and ovarian cancer patients from different regions in the Tyrol. Cancer registry data were used to evaluate the impact of this mutation on regional cancer incidence. The mutation c.4183C>T was detected in 30.4% of hereditary BRCA1-associated breast and ovarian cancer patients in our cohort. It was also identified in 4.1% of unselected (26% of unselected triple negative) Tyrolean breast cancer patients and 6.8% of unselected ovarian cancer patients from the Lower Inn Valley (LIV) region. Cancer incidences showed a region-specific increase in age-stratified breast and ovarian cancer risk with standardized incidence ratios of 1.23 and 2.13, respectively. We, thus, report a Tyrolean BRCA1 founder mutation that correlates to a local increase in the breast and ovarian cancer risks. On the basis of its high prevalence, we suggest that targeted genetic analysis should be offered to all women with breast or ovarian cancer and ancestry from the LIV region.
Collapse
|
165
|
Kluska A, Balabas A, Paziewska A, Kulecka M, Nowakowska D, Mikula M, Ostrowski J. New recurrent BRCA1/2 mutations in Polish patients with familial breast/ovarian cancer detected by next generation sequencing. BMC Med Genomics 2015; 8:19. [PMID: 25948282 PMCID: PMC4429836 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-015-0092-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Targeted PCR-based genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 can be performed at a lower cost than full gene testing; however, it may overlook mutations responsible for familial breast and/or ovarian cancers. In the present study, we report the utility of next generation sequencing (NGS) to identify new pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2. Methods BRCA1 and BRCA2 exons were amplified using the Ion AmpliSeq BRCA1/2 Panel and sequenced on the Ion Torrent PGM sequencer in 512 women with familial and/or only early onset breast and/or ovarian cancers who were negative for selected BRCA1/2 mutations. Results 146 single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 32 indels were identified. Of them, 14 SNVs and 17 indels were considered as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. One and 18 pathogenic mutations had been detected previously in the Polish and other populations, respectively, and 12 deleterious mutations were previously unknown. Eight mutations were recurrent; Q563X (BRCA1), N3124I (BRCA2) and c.4516delG (BRCA1) were found in eight, six and four patients, respectively, and two other mutations (c.9118-2A > G and c.7249delCA in BRCA2) were detected in three patients each. Altogether, BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations were identified in 52 out of 512 (10%) patients. Conclusions NGS substantially improved the detection rates of a wide spectrum of mutations in Polish patients with familial breast and/or ovarian cancer. Although targeted screening for specific BRCA1 mutations can be offered to all Polish breast or ovarian cancer patients, NGS-based testing is justified in patients with breast or ovarian cancer likely related to BRCA1/2 who test negative for the selected BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12920-015-0092-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kluska
- Department of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Aneta Balabas
- Department of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Agnieszka Paziewska
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, 01-813, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Maria Kulecka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, 01-813, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Dorota Nowakowska
- Department of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Michal Mikula
- Department of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Jerzy Ostrowski
- Department of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland. .,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, 01-813, Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
The prevalence and spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Korean population: recent update of the Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer (KOHBRA) study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 151:157-68. [PMID: 25863477 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3377-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer (KOHBRA) study was established to evaluate the prevalence and spectrum of BRCA1/2 mutations in Korean breast cancer patients at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A total of 2953 subjects (2403 index patients and 550 family members of affected carriers) from 36 centers participated in this study between May 2007 and December 2013. All participants received genetic counseling and BRCA genetic testing. In total, 378 mutation carriers among 2403 index patients were identified. The prevalence of BRCA mutations in specific subgroups was as follows: 22.3 % (274/1228) for breast cancer patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancers, 8.8 % (39/441) for patients with early-onset (<35 years) breast cancer without a family history, 16.3 % (34/209) for patients with bilateral breast cancer, 4.8 % (1/21) for male patients with breast cancer, and 37.5 % (3/8) for patients with both breast and ovarian cancer. From an analysis of the mutation spectrum, 63 BRCA1 and 90 BRCA2 different mutations, including 44 novel mutations, were identified. The c.7480 (p.Arg2494Ter) mutation in BRCA2 (10.1 %) was the most commonly identified in this cohort. The KOHBRA study is the largest cohort to identify BRCA mutation carriers in Asia. The results suggest that the prevalence of BRCA mutations in familial breast cancer patients is similar to that among Western cohorts. However, some single risk factors without family histories (early-onset breast cancer, male breast cancer, or multiple organ cancers) may limit the utility of BRCA gene testing in the Korean population.
Collapse
|
167
|
Age-specific risk of breast cancer in women with neurofibromatosis type 1. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:1546-8. [PMID: 25742481 PMCID: PMC4453683 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Young women with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are reported to have a higher risk of breast cancer than others, and this might have implications for screening programmes. Our aim was to calculate this risk. Methods: An all-England linked data set of hospital admissions and deaths was analysed to determine age-specific rates of breast cancer in women with NF1 and controls. Results: The age-specific excess risk of breast cancer, comparing the NF1 cohort with the control cohort, was elevated 6.5-fold (95% confidence interval 2.6–13.5) in women aged 30–39 years. There was a 4.4 (2.5–7.0) times higher risk among women aged 40–49. Conclusions: Women with NF1 develop breast cancer at younger ages than the general population.
Collapse
|
168
|
Prevalence and clinical outcomes of young breast cancer (YBC) patients according to intrinsic breast cancer subtypes: Single institutional experience in Korea. Breast 2015; 24:213-7. [PMID: 25728283 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Revised: 12/24/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to investigate and identify comprehensively the clinicopathological features and long-term outcome of young breast cancer (YBC) according to intrinsic subtype. We analyzed clinical and pathological characteristics of 2844 women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2000 to 2007 and the treatment outcomes by age at diagnosis. The median age of the patients was 46 years (range, 21-83 years), and we divided them into three age group: ≤35 years (Group 1), 36-50 years (Group 2), and >50 years (Group 3). During a median follow-up of 100 months, the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFSR) and overall survival rate (OSR) were 90.8% and 94.6%, respectively. The 10-year estimated RFSR and OSR were 81.9% and 86.9%, respectively. The prognosis of TN subtype appeared not to be worse than that of other subtypes in Group 1. In Group 1 alone (≤35 years), subtype was not identified as an independent risk factor for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) in a Cox-regression multivariate model (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.68-1.06; p = 0.148). This analysis revealed a very high prevalence of YBC in this cohort. The poor outcomes of YBC patients might result from an increased frequency of triple negative (TN)/HER2 subtypes and the more aggressive clinical behavior of ER-positive tumors compared with older patients. Further research to elucidate the biologic difference of the ER+ tumors of YBC patients is warranted.
Collapse
|
169
|
Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 150:71-80. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3293-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 01/31/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
170
|
Two novel frameshift mutations in BRCA2 gene detected by next generation sequencing in a survey of Spanish patients of breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2015; 17:576-80. [DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1271-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
171
|
Manchanda R, Legood R, Burnell M, McGuire A, Raikou M, Loggenberg K, Wardle J, Sanderson S, Gessler S, Side L, Balogun N, Desai R, Kumar A, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Taylor R, Jacobs C, Tomlinson I, Beller U, Menon U, Jacobs I. Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:380. [PMID: 25435542 PMCID: PMC4301704 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 10/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-based testing for BRCA1/2 mutations detects the high proportion of carriers not identified by cancer family history (FH)-based testing. We compared the cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA testing with the standard FH-based approach in Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) women. METHODS A decision-analytic model was developed to compare lifetime costs and effects amongst AJ women in the UK of BRCA founder-mutation testing amongst: 1) all women in the population age 30 years or older and 2) just those with a strong FH (≥10% mutation risk). The model assumes that BRCA carriers are offered risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and annual MRI/mammography screening or risk-reducing mastectomy. Model probabilities utilize the Genetic Cancer Prediction through Population Screening trial/published literature to estimate total costs, effects in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cancer incidence, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and population impact. Costs are reported at 2010 prices. Costs/outcomes were discounted at 3.5%. We used deterministic/probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) to evaluate model uncertainty. RESULTS Compared with FH-based testing, population-screening saved 0.090 more life-years and 0.101 more QALYs resulting in 33 days' gain in life expectancy. Population screening was found to be cost saving with a baseline-discounted ICER of -£2079/QALY. Population-based screening lowered ovarian and breast cancer incidence by 0.34% and 0.62%. Assuming 71% testing uptake, this leads to 276 fewer ovarian and 508 fewer breast cancer cases. Overall, reduction in treatment costs led to a discounted cost savings of £3.7 million. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and 94% of simulations on PSA (threshold £20000) indicated that population screening is cost-effective, compared with current NHS policy. CONCLUSION Population-based screening for BRCA mutations is highly cost-effective compared with an FH-based approach in AJ women age 30 years and older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Matthew Burnell
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Alistair McGuire
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Maria Raikou
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Kelly Loggenberg
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Jane Wardle
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Saskia Sanderson
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Sue Gessler
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Lucy Side
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Nyala Balogun
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rakshit Desai
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ajith Kumar
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Huw Dorkins
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Yvonne Wallis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Cyril Chapman
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rohan Taylor
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Uziel Beller
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Usha Menon
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ian Jacobs
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ).
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Manchanda R, Loggenberg K, Sanderson S, Burnell M, Wardle J, Gessler S, Side L, Balogun N, Desai R, Kumar A, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Taylor R, Jacobs C, Tomlinson I, McGuire A, Beller U, Menon U, Jacobs I. Population testing for cancer predisposing BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi-Jewish community: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:379. [PMID: 25435541 PMCID: PMC4301703 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 07/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technological advances raise the possibility of systematic population-based genetic testing for cancer-predisposing mutations, but it is uncertain whether benefits outweigh disadvantages. We directly compared the psychological/quality-of-life consequences of such an approach to family history (FH)-based testing. METHODS In a randomized controlled trial of BRCA1/2 gene-mutation testing in the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population, we compared testing all participants in the population screening (PS) arm with testing those fulfilling standard FH-based clinical criteria (FH arm). Following a targeted community campaign, AJ participants older than 18 years were recruited by self-referral after pretest genetic counseling. The effects of BRCA1/2 genetic testing on acceptability, psychological impact, and quality-of-life measures were assessed by random effects regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS One thousand, one hundred sixty-eight AJ individuals were counseled, 1042 consented, 1034 were randomly assigned (691 women, 343 men), and 1017 were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 54.3 (SD = 14.66) years. Thirteen BRCA1/2 carriers were identified in the PS arm, nine in the FH arm. Five more carriers were detected among FH-negative FH-arm participants following study completion. There were no statistically significant differences between the FH and PS arms at seven days or three months on measures of anxiety, depression, health anxiety, distress, uncertainty, and quality-of-life. Contrast tests indicated that overall anxiety (P = .0001) and uncertainty (P = .005) associated with genetic testing decreased; positive experience scores increased (P = .0001); quality-of-life and health anxiety did not change with time. Overall, 56% of carriers did not fulfill clinical criteria for genetic testing, and the BRCA1/2 prevalence was 2.45%. CONCLUSION Compared with FH-based testing, population-based genetic testing in Ashkenazi Jews doesn't adversely affect short-term psychological/quality-of-life outcomes and may detect 56% additional BRCA carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Kelly Loggenberg
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Saskia Sanderson
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Matthew Burnell
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Jane Wardle
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Sue Gessler
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Lucy Side
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Nyala Balogun
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rakshit Desai
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ajith Kumar
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Huw Dorkins
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Yvonne Wallis
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Cyril Chapman
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rohan Taylor
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Alistair McGuire
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Uziel Beller
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Usha Menon
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ian Jacobs
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ).
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Lee HB, Han W. Unique features of young age breast cancer and its management. J Breast Cancer 2014; 17:301-7. [PMID: 25548576 PMCID: PMC4278047 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.4.301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2014] [Accepted: 11/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Young age breast cancer (YABC) has unique clinical and biological features that are not seen in older patients. Breast tumor biology is more aggressive and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in younger women. The diagnosis of breast cancer is often delayed, resulting in their initial presentation with more advanced disease. Together, these characteristics lead to a poorer prognosis in younger women than in older women. Young women who receive breast-conserving therapy have a higher rate of local recurrence. Therefore, it is important to secure sufficient resection margins and consider boost radiotherapy to prevent local treatment failure. Based on age alone, patients with YABC should be regarded as high-risk cases, and they should be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Special considerations regarding psychosocial factors and fertility should be taken into account for young patients. This review discusses the major considerations and principles concerning the management of patients with YABC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Byoel Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Sapkota Y. Germline DNA variations in breast cancer predisposition and prognosis: a systematic review of the literature. Cytogenet Genome Res 2014; 144:77-91. [PMID: 25401968 DOI: 10.1159/000369045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of death in women worldwide. The disease is caused by a combination of genetic, environmental, lifestyle, and reproductive risk factors. Linkage and family-based studies have identified many pathological germline mutations, which account for around 20% of the genetic risk of familial breast cancer. In recent years, single nucleotide polymorphism-based genetic association studies, especially genome-wide association studies (GWASs), have been very successful in uncovering low-penetrance common variants associated with breast cancer risk. These common variants alone may explain up to an additional 30% of the familial risk of breast cancer. With the advent of available genetic resources and growing collaborations among researchers across the globe, the much needed large sample size to capture variants with small effect sizes and low population frequencies is being addressed, and hence many more common variants are expected to be discovered in the coming days. Here, major GWASs conducted for breast cancer predisposition and prognosis until 2013 are summarized. Few studies investigating other forms of genetic variations contributing to breast cancer predisposition and disease outcomes are also discussed. Finally, the potential utility of the GWAS-identified variants in disease risk models and some future perspectives are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yadav Sapkota
- The Neurogenetics Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Qld., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Rich TA, Woodson AH, Litton J, Arun B. Hereditary breast cancer syndromes and genetic testing. J Surg Oncol 2014; 111:66-80. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.23791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2014] [Accepted: 07/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thereasa A. Rich
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program; Department of Surgical Oncology; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Ashley H. Woodson
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program; Department of Breast Medical Oncology; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Jennifer Litton
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program; Department of Breast Medical Oncology; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Banu Arun
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program; Department of Breast Medical Oncology; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Clinicopathologic characteristics of breast cancer in BRCA-carriers and non-carriers in women 35 years of age or less. Breast 2014; 23:770-4. [PMID: 25231195 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2014] [Revised: 08/05/2014] [Accepted: 08/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer diagnosed in women 35 years of age or less accounts for <2% of all breast cancer cases. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of early onset breast cancer are not well defined in BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers. METHODS 194 women diagnosed with breast cancer at 35 years of age or less who had BRCA1/2 mutation testing were included in the study. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the associations between clinical variables and BRCA status. RESULTS Thirty-two (17%) and 12 (6%) patients had BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively. BRCA1-carriers had a higher likelihood of a positive family history (FH) of breast and/or ovarian cancer (P = 0.001), or first-degree relatives diagnosed with breast cancer at <50 years old (P = 0.001) compared to non-carriers. BRCA2-carriers were more likely to have a FH of male breast cancer compared to noncarriers (P = 0.02). Among BRCA2-carriers, the age at first full-term pregnancy was younger in ER-negative cases compared with ERpositive cases (19.5 vs. 28.5 years old; P = 0.01). BRCA1-carriers with a later age at menarche were more likely to have a later stage at diagnosis (P = 0.04). Non-carriers with a lower BMI were more likely to have lymph node involvement (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Several associations were identified between reproductive risk factors or BMI and disease characteristics. Further characterization may result in a better understanding of the trends in young onset breast cancer in BRCA-carriers and non-carriers.
Collapse
|
177
|
Blanco A, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Santamariña M, Montalban G, Bonache S, Balmaña J, Carracedo A, Diez O, Vega A. RAD51C germline mutations found in Spanish site-specific breast cancer and breast-ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 147:133-43. [PMID: 25086635 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3078-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most well-known breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Additional genes involved in DNA repair have been identified as predisposing to breast cancer. Recently, RAD51C, a new Fanconi Anemia gene, essential for homologous recombination repair, has been reported to be a rare hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Indeed, several pathogenic mutations have been identified in BRCA1/BRCA2-negative hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Here, we present the results of the screening of RAD51C mutations in a large series of 516 BRCA1/BRCA2-negative Spanish patients from breast and/or ovarian cancer families, and the evaluation of these results in the context of all RAD51C carriers. RAD51C mutation screening was performed by DNA analysis for all index cases. All the genetic variants identified were analyzed in silico for splicing and protein predictions. cDNA analysis was performed for three selected variants. All previous RAD51C mutation studies on breast and/or ovarian cancer were reviewed. We identified three inactivating RAD51C mutations. Two mutations were found in breast and ovarian cancer families and one mutation in a site-specific breast cancer family. Based on the mean age of ovarian cancer diagnosis in RAD51C carriers, we would recommend prophylactic bilateral salpingo-ophorectomy in premenopausal RAD51C mutation carriers. Our results support that RAD51C is a rare breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene and may contribute to a small fraction of families including breast and ovarian cancer cases and families with only breast cancer. Thus, RAD51C testing should be offered to hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer families without selecting for specific cancer origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Blanco
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica-Servicio Galego de Saúde, Grupo de Medicina Xenómica-Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spanish Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
178
|
Chiarelli AM, Prummel MV, Muradali D, Majpruz V, Horgan M, Carroll JC, Eisen A, Meschino WS, Shumak RS, Warner E, Rabeneck L. Effectiveness of Screening With Annual Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography: Results of the Initial Screen From the Ontario High Risk Breast Screening Program. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:2224-30. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.52.8331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Ontario Breast Screening Program expanded in July 2011 to screen women age 30 to 69 years at high risk for breast cancer with annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital mammography. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first organized screening program for women at high risk for breast cancer. Patients and Methods Performance measures after assessment were compared with screening results for 2,207 women with initial screening examinations. The following criteria were used to determine eligibility: known mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or other gene predisposing to a markedly increased risk of breast cancer, untested first-degree relative of a gene mutation carrier, family history consistent with hereditary breast cancer syndrome and estimated personal lifetime breast cancer risk ≥ 25%, or radiation therapy to the chest (before age 30 years and at least 8 years previously). Results The recall rate was significantly higher among women who had abnormal MRI alone (15.1%; 95% CI, 13.8% to 16.4%) compared with mammogram alone (6.4%; 95% CI, 5.5% to 7.3%). Of the 35 breast cancers detected (16.3 per 1,000; 95% CI, 11.2 to 22.2), none were detected by mammogram alone, 23 (65.7%) were detected by MRI alone (10.7 per 1,000; 95% CI, 6.7 to 15.8), and 25 (71%) were detected among women who were known gene mutation carriers (30.8 per 1,000, 95% CI, 19.4 to 43.7). The positive predictive value was highest for detection based on mammogram and MRI (12.4%; 95% CI, 7.3% to 19.3%). Conclusion Screening with annual MRI combined with mammography has the potential to be effectively implemented into an organized breast screening program for women at high risk for breast cancer. This could be considered an important management option for known BRCA gene mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M. Chiarelli
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maegan V. Prummel
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Derek Muradali
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vicky Majpruz
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meaghan Horgan
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - June C. Carroll
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy S. Meschino
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rene S. Shumak
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ellen Warner
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Anna M. Chiarelli, Maegan V. Prummel, Derek Muradali, Vicky Majpruz, Meaghan Horgan, Rene S. Shumak, and Linda Rabeneck, Cancer Care Ontario; Anna M. Chiarelli, Derek Muradali, June C. Carroll, Andrea Eisen, Ellen Warner, and Linda Rabeneck, University of Toronto; June C. Carroll, Mount Sinai Hospital; Andrea Eisen and Ellen Warner, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and Wendy S. Meschino, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
The incidence of PALB2 c.3113G>A in women with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer attending familial cancer centres in Australia. Fam Cancer 2014; 12:587-95. [PMID: 23471749 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9620-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The familial aggregation of breast cancer has been well-described with approximately 25% of breast cancers attributable to inherited mutations in currently known breast cancer susceptibility genes. PALB2 c.3113G>A (p.Trp1038*) is a protein-truncating mutation which has been associated with high estimated risk of breast cancer in Australian women (91%; 95% CI = 44-100) to age 70 years. This study screened for PALB2 c.3113G>A in germline DNA representing 871 unrelated individuals from "high-risk" breast and/or ovarian cancer families evaluated in the setting of a Familial Cancer Centre in Australia. The PALB2 c.3113G>A mutation was identified in eight of 871 probands (0.92%) from these families. Median age of diagnosis was 42 years. Five of these eight women had contra-lateral breast cancers. Available data suggests that PALB2 c.3113G>A is a rare mutation with estimated breast cancer risks similar in magnitude to that associated with BRCA2 mutations. Although the proportion of high-risk women carrying this PALB2 mutation is low, research efforts should continue in order to effect its translation into clinical genetic testing practice.
Collapse
|
180
|
Gewefel H, Salhia B. Breast cancer in adolescent and young adult women. Clin Breast Cancer 2014; 14:390-5. [PMID: 25034440 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2014] [Revised: 06/07/2014] [Accepted: 06/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among adolescent and young adult (AYA) women, accounting for approximately 14% of all AYA cancer diagnoses and 7% of all breast cancer. Breast cancer in AYA women is believed to represent a more biologically aggressive disease, but aside from commonly known hereditary predispositions, little is still known about the underlying molecular genetic causes. This review examines the current trends of breast cancer in AYA women as they relate to clinical, social, genetic, and molecular pathologic characteristics. We highlight existing trends, treatment and imaging approaches, and health burdens as they relate to breast cancer in AYA women and provide a discussion on ways to help improve the overall management of this breast cancer cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanan Gewefel
- Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Misr University for Science and Technology, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Bodour Salhia
- Integrated Cancer Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Wei JT, Huang WH, Du CW, Qiu SQ, Wei XL, Liu J, Zhang GJ. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of young breast cancers in Eastern Guangdong of China. Sci Rep 2014; 4:5360. [PMID: 24942640 PMCID: PMC5381536 DOI: 10.1038/srep05360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2013] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer in young women is typically with higher proportion of adverse pathological features. Breast cancer with BRCA1 mutation is often early-onset, and is usually associated with triple negative phenotpe. In this study, we aim to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in young breast cancer patients (≤35 years old) comparing to non-young patients (>35 years old). A total of 1913 cases of primary breast carcinoma with stage I-III were enrolled, with 283 cases diagnosed as young patients. No significant difference was observed in tumor size, TNM staging, lymph node metastasis, ER, HER-2 or histological grade between young and non-young patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). In 70 samples of young patients available, BRCA1 was immunohistochemically positive 85.7% in cytoplasm and 41.4% in nuclear. BRCA1 nuclear expression is not significantly associated with clinicopathological characteristics in young breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Tao Wei
- The Breast Center, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
- These authors contributed equally to this work
- Current address: Breast Tumor Center, Chancheng District Central Hospital of Foshan City, Foshan 528031, China
| | - Wen-He Huang
- The Breast Center, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
- These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Cai-Wen Du
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
| | - Si-Qi Qiu
- The Breast Center, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
| | - Xiao-Long Wei
- Cancer Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Cancer Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
| | - Guo-Jun Zhang
- The Breast Center, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
- Cancer Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Double heterozygosity for germline mutations in BRCA1 and p53 in a woman with early onset breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 146:447-50. [PMID: 24916180 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3011-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2014] [Accepted: 05/26/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
To report on a highly unusual case of a 20-year-old woman who presented with multifocal metaplastic breast cancer and was subsequently found to carry deleterious germline mutations in both BRCA1 and p53. Genetic testing was requested on an expedited basis to assist in surgical decision-making and BRCA1/2 and p53 genetic analysis was ordered concurrently. BRCA1/2 and p53 analyses were completed using a combination of direct DNA sequencing and multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA). The patient was found to carry a deletion of exon 3 of the BRCA1 gene and a splice site mutation at the exon4/intron4 boundary of the p53 gene. To our knowledge, this is the first report of double heterozygosity in BRCA1 and p53. The patient's clinical presentation is highly reminiscent of that predicted by preclinical mouse models. In patients with early onset breast cancer, the possibility of germline mutations in more than one cancer susceptibility gene should be considered. This could have important clinical implications for patients and their at-risk family members.
Collapse
|
183
|
Melchor L, Molyneux G, Mackay A, Magnay FA, Atienza M, Kendrick H, Nava-Rodrigues D, López-García MÁ, Milanezi F, Greenow K, Robertson D, Palacios J, Reis-Filho JS, Smalley MJ. Identification of cellular and genetic drivers of breast cancer heterogeneity in genetically engineered mouse tumour models. J Pathol 2014; 233:124-37. [PMID: 24615332 DOI: 10.1002/path.4345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2013] [Revised: 01/24/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The heterogeneous nature of mammary tumours may arise from different initiating genetic lesions occurring in distinct cells of origin. Here, we generated mice in which Brca2, Pten and p53 were depleted in either basal mammary epithelial cells or luminal oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative cells. Basal cell-origin tumours displayed similar histological phenotypes, regardless of the depleted gene. In contrast, luminal ER-negative cells gave rise to diverse phenotypes, depending on the initiating lesions, including both ER-negative and, strikingly, ER-positive invasive ductal carcinomas. Molecular profiling demonstrated that luminal ER-negative cell-origin tumours resembled a range of the molecular subtypes of human breast cancer, including basal-like, luminal B and 'normal-like'. Furthermore, a subset of these tumours resembled the 'claudin-low' tumour subtype. These findings demonstrate that not only do mammary tumour phenotypes depend on the interactions between cell of origin and driver genetic aberrations, but also multiple mammary tumour subtypes, including both ER-positive and -negative disease, can originate from a single epithelial cell type. This is a fundamental advance in our understanding of tumour aetiology.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- BRCA2 Protein/deficiency
- BRCA2 Protein/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Cell Proliferation
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/metabolism
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology
- Claudins/metabolism
- Disease Models, Animal
- Epithelial Cells/metabolism
- Epithelial Cells/pathology
- Female
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease
- Humans
- Mammary Glands, Animal/metabolism
- Mammary Glands, Animal/pathology
- Mice
- Mice, Knockout
- PTEN Phosphohydrolase/deficiency
- PTEN Phosphohydrolase/genetics
- Phenotype
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Time Factors
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/deficiency
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Melchor
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
184
|
McIver LJ, Fonville NC, Karunasena E, Garner HR. Microsatellite genotyping reveals a signature in breast cancer exomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 145:791-8. [PMID: 24838940 PMCID: PMC4031393 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2908-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2014] [Accepted: 03/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Genomic instability at microsatellite loci is a hallmark of many cancers, including breast cancer. However, much of the genomic variation and many of the hereditary components responsible for breast cancer remain undetected. We hypothesized that variation at microsatellites could provide additional genomic markers for breast cancer risk assessment. A total of 1,345 germline and tumor DNA samples from individuals diagnosed with breast cancer, exome sequenced as part of The Cancer Genome Atlas, were analyzed for microsatellite variation. The comparison group for our analysis, representing healthy individuals, consisted of 249 females which were exome sequenced as part of the 1,000 Genomes Project. We applied our microsatellite-based genotyping pipeline to identify 55 microsatellite loci that can distinguish between the germline of individuals diagnosed with breast cancer and healthy individuals with a sensitivity of 88.4 % and a specificity of 77.1 %. Further, we identified additional microsatellite loci that are potentially useful for distinguishing between breast cancer subtypes, revealing a possible fifth subtype. These findings are of clinical interest as possible risk diagnostics and reveal genes that may be of potential therapeutic value, including genes previously not associated with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. J. McIver
- Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Tech, 1015 Life Science Circle, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
| | - N. C. Fonville
- Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Tech, 1015 Life Science Circle, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
| | - E. Karunasena
- Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Tech, 1015 Life Science Circle, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
| | - H. R. Garner
- Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Tech, 1015 Life Science Circle, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Silva FC, Lisboa BCG, Figueiredo MCP, Torrezan GT, Santos ÉMM, Krepischi AC, Rossi BM, Achatz MI, Carraro DM. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: assessment of point mutations and copy number variations in Brazilian patients. BMC MEDICAL GENETICS 2014; 15:55. [PMID: 24884479 PMCID: PMC4038072 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-15-55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2013] [Accepted: 04/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germ line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) and other susceptibility genes have been identified as genetic causes of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). To identify the disease-causing mutations in a cohort of 120 Brazilian women fulfilling criteria for HBOC, we carried out a comprehensive screening of BRCA1/2, TP53 R337H, CHEK2 1100delC, followed by an analysis of copy number variations in 14 additional breast cancer susceptibility genes (PTEN, ATM, NBN, RAD50, RAD51, BRIP1, PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, TP53, CDKN2A, CDH1 and CTNNB1). METHODS Capillary sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were used for detecting point mutations and copy number variations (CNVs), respectively, for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes; capillary sequencing was used for point mutation for both variants TP53 R337H and CHEK2 1100delC, and finally array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) was used for identifying CNVs in the 14 additional genes. RESULTS The positive detection rate in our series was 26%. BRCA1 pathogenic mutations were found in 20 cases, including two cases with CNVs, whereas BRCA2 mutations were found in 7 cases. We also found three patients with the TP53 R337H mutation and one patient with the CHEK2 1100delC mutation. Seven (25%) pathogenic mutations in BRCA1/2 were firstly described, including a splice-site BRCA1 mutation for which pathogenicity was confirmed by the presence of an aberrant transcript showing the loss of the last 62 bp of exon 7. Microdeletions of exon 4 in ATM and exon 2 in PTEN were identified in BRCA2-mutated and BRCA1/2-negative patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In summary, our results showed a high frequency of BRCA1/2 mutations and a higher prevalence of BRCA1 (64.5%) gene. Moreover, the detection of the TP53 R337H variant in our series and the fact that this variant has a founder effect in our population prompted us to suggest that all female breast cancer patients with clinical criteria for HBOC and negative for BRCA1/2 genes should be tested for the TP53 R337H variant. Furthermore, the presence of genomic structural rearrangement resulting in CNVs in other genes that predispose breast cancer in conjunction with BRCA2 point mutations demonstrated a highly complex genetic etiology in Brazilian breast cancer families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe C Silva
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, CIPE - A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bianca CG Lisboa
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, CIPE - A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcia CP Figueiredo
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, CIPE - A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Giovana T Torrezan
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, CIPE - A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Érika MM Santos
- Department of Colorectal Tumors, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ana C Krepischi
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, CIPE - A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
- National Institute of Science and Technology in Oncogenomics (INCITO), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Benedito M Rossi
- Department of Colorectal Tumors, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Maria I Achatz
- National Institute of Science and Technology in Oncogenomics (INCITO), São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Oncogenetics, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Dirce M Carraro
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, CIPE - A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
- National Institute of Science and Technology in Oncogenomics (INCITO), São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Assessment of individuals with BRCA1 and BRCA2 large rearrangements in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 145:625-34. [PMID: 24825132 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2987-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Accepted: 04/26/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BRCA1/2 large rearrangement (LR) testing has been available to patients since 2006. Three existing models commonly used in cancer genetics clinical and research settings (BRCAPRO, Penn II and Myriad II) have not been assessed for their performance in predicting the presence of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements in patients who do not have mutations detectable by the traditional Sanger sequencing approach. This study sought to determine if there is an optimal pre-test probability "cut off" value, calculated using these models, to optimize detection of large rearrangements (LRs). Our cohort consisted of 3,301 probands seen for genetic counseling and BRCA1/2 clinical testing from September 2006 to September 2011. A detailed personal and three-generation family history, including self-reported ethnicity, was taken as part of our standard clinical practice. We applied the BRCAPRO, Penn II, and Myriad II models to the probands with LRs. In our cohort of 3,301 probands, 150 carried a non-Ashkenazi mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Seventeen unrelated probands carried a private BRCA1/2 LR (17/150, 11.3 % of all detectable non-AJ mutations). At a pre-test probability cutoff of 10 %, all three empiric risk models would have failed to identify almost 30 % of probands with LRs. Our study shows that BRCA1/2 LR testing should be offered to all women who meet criteria for BRCA1/2 sequence analysis.
Collapse
|
187
|
Thangjam S, Laishram RS, Debnath K. Breast carcinoma in young females below the age of 40 years: A histopathological perspective. South Asian J Cancer 2014; 3:97-100. [PMID: 24818103 PMCID: PMC4014656 DOI: 10.4103/2278-330x.130441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer among young women is a rare pathology, but is known to have a more aggressive behavior and poorer outcome. Aims: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of breast carcinoma below 40 years in comparison to that over 40 years in Manipur, India. Settings and Design: This retrospective study from the period of January 2005-December 2010 was conducted in the Department of Pathology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur. Materials and Methods: All cases of mastectomy specimens of carcinoma breast from the period of January 2005-December 2010 were included in the study. Clinical and histopathological data of all cases were reviewed and correlated. Results: A total of 507 mastectomy specimens were received, among which, 160 cases (31.56%) were below 40 years; whereas 347 cases (68.44%) were above 40 years of age. Stage III was the commonest stage (47% versus 18%) in the younger group; while in the older group, Stage II was the commonest (64% versus 34%). Conclusion: This study shows that young females with breast cancer have higher stage of tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shitalmala Thangjam
- Department of Pathology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Lamphelpat, Imphal, Manipur, India
| | - Rajesh Singh Laishram
- Department of Pathology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Lamphelpat, Imphal, Manipur, India
| | - Kaushik Debnath
- Department of Pathology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Lamphelpat, Imphal, Manipur, India
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Couch FJ, Nathanson KL, Offit K. Two decades after BRCA: setting paradigms in personalized cancer care and prevention. Science 2014; 343:1466-70. [PMID: 24675953 DOI: 10.1126/science.1251827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 270] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The cloning of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 nearly two decades ago helped set in motion an avalanche of research exploring how genomic information can be optimally applied to identify and clinically care for individuals with a high risk of developing cancer. Genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other breast cancer susceptibility genes has since proved to be a valuable tool for determining eligibility for enhanced screening and prevention strategies, as well as for identifying patients most likely to benefit from a targeted therapy. Here, we discuss the landscape of inherited mutations and sequence variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, the complexities of determining disease risk when the pathogenicity of sequence variants is uncertain, and current strategies for clinical management of women who carry BRCA1/2 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fergus J Couch
- Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
189
|
Pilgrim SM, Pain SJ, Tischkowitz MD. Opportunities and challenges of next-generation DNA sequencing for breast units. Br J Surg 2014; 101:889-98. [PMID: 24676784 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this review is to introduce the topic of next-generation DNA sequencing, a new technology that is being introduced into clinical practice, and to explain the potential impact for breast cancer surgeons and the wider breast cancer multidisciplinary team. METHODS The PubMed database was used to identify relevant studies relating to breast cancer genetics. This evidence was then used to provide context and background information to demonstrate how next-generation sequencing (NGS) might change breast cancer practice. RESULTS With NGS, breast cancer clinicians will know whether their patients carry high-risk mutations in genes, such as BRCA1 or BRCA2, before the start of treatment. This could alter treatment decisions; for instance, more women might opt for mastectomy instead of breast-conserving surgery, or for bilateral rather than unilateral surgery. CONCLUSION The introduction of NGS will have a significant impact on breast cancer services in the near future. Speed of testing will improve in regions of the world where NGS is adopted in place of conventional sequencing, and, as costs decrease, genetic testing will also become accessible and realistic in less well funded health economies. This will create opportunities to improve patient treatment and challenges for the breast cancer multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Pilgrim
- Cambridge Breast Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
190
|
Pradella LM, Evangelisti C, Ligorio C, Ceccarelli C, Neri I, Zuntini R, Amato LB, Ferrari S, Martelli AM, Gasparre G, Turchetti D. A novel deleterious PTEN mutation in a patient with early-onset bilateral breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:70. [PMID: 24498881 PMCID: PMC3922036 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2013] [Accepted: 02/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An early age at Breast Cancer (BC) onset may be a hallmark of inherited predisposition, but BRCA1/2 mutations are only found in a minority of younger BC patients. Among the others, a fraction may carry mutations in rarer BC genes, such as TP53, STK11, CDH1 and PTEN. As the identification of women harboring such mutations allows for targeted risk-management, the knowledge of associated manifestations and an accurate clinical and family history evaluation are warranted. Case presentation We describe the case of a woman who developed an infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the right breast at the age of 32, a contralateral BC at age 36 and another BC of the right breast at 40. When she was 39 years-old, during a dermatological examination, mucocutaneous features suggestive of Cowden Syndrome, a disorder associated to germ-line PTEN mutations, were noticed. PTEN genetic testing revealed the novel c.71A > T (p.Asp24Val) mutation, whose deleterious effect, suggested by conservation data and in silico tools, was definitely demonstrated by the incapacity of mutant PTEN to inhibit Akt phosphorylation when used to complement PTEN-null cells. In BC tissue, despite the absence of LOH or somatic mutations of PTEN, Akt phosphorylation was markedly increased in comparison to normal tissue, thus implying additional somatic events into the deregulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and, presumably, into carcinogenesis. Hence, known oncogenic mutations in PIK3CA (exons 10 and 21) and AKT1 (exon 2) were screened in tumor DNA with negative results, which suggests that the responsible somatic event(s) is a different, uncommon one. Conclusion This case stresses the importance of clinical/genetic assessment of early-onset BC patients in order to identify mutation carriers, who are at high risk of new events, so requiring tailored management. Moreover, it revealed a novel PTEN mutation with pathogenic effect, pointing out, however, the need for further efforts to elucidate the molecular steps of PTEN-associated carcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniela Turchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Unit of Medical Genetics, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Caleca L, Putignano AL, Colombo M, Congregati C, Sarkar M, Magliery TJ, Ripamonti CB, Foglia C, Peissel B, Zaffaroni D, Manoukian S, Tondini C, Barile M, Pensotti V, Bernard L, Papi L, Radice P. Characterization of an Italian founder mutation in the RING-finger domain of BRCA1. PLoS One 2014; 9:e86924. [PMID: 24516540 PMCID: PMC3916327 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 12/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The identification of founder mutations in cancer predisposing genes is important to improve risk assessment in geographically defined populations, since it may provide specific targets resulting in cost-effective genetic testing. Here, we report the characterization of the BRCA1 c.190T>C (p.Cys64Arg) mutation, mapped to the RING-finger domain coding region, that we detected in 43 hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) families, for the large part originating from the province of Bergamo (Northern Italy). Haplotype analysis was performed in 21 families, and led to the identification of a shared haplotype extending over three BRCA1-associated marker loci (0.4 cM). Using the DMLE+2.2 software program and regional population demographic data, we were able to estimate the age of the mutation to vary between 3,100 and 3,350 years old. Functional characterization of the mutation was carried out at both transcript and protein level. Reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis on lymphoblastoid cells revealed expression of full length mRNA from the mutant allele. A green fluorescent protein (GFP)-fragment reassembly assay showed that the p.Cys64Arg substitution prevents the binding of the BRCA1 protein to the interacting protein BARD1, in a similar way as proven deleterious mutations in the RING-domain. Overall, 55 of 83 (66%) female mutation carriers had a diagnosis of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Our observations indicate that the BRCA1 c.190T>C is a pathogenic founder mutation present in the Italian population. Further analyses will evaluate whether screening for this mutation can be suggested as an effective strategy for the rapid identification of at-risk individuals in the Bergamo area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Caleca
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), c/o Amadeolab, Milano, Italy
- * E-mail:
| | - Anna Laura Putignano
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- FiorGen Foundation for Pharmacogenomics, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Mara Colombo
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), c/o Amadeolab, Milano, Italy
| | - Caterina Congregati
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mohosin Sarkar
- Department of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Thomas J. Magliery
- Department of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Carla B. Ripamonti
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), c/o Amadeolab, Milano, Italy
| | - Claudia Foglia
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), c/o Amadeolab, Milano, Italy
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Zaffaroni
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Tondini
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Monica Barile
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Pensotti
- COGENTECH-Cancer Genetic Testing Laboratory, Milan, Italy
- Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy
| | - Loris Bernard
- COGENTECH-Cancer Genetic Testing Laboratory, Milan, Italy
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Papi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), c/o Amadeolab, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Wu YY, Yen MF, Yu CP, Chen HH. Risk assessment of multistate progression of breast tumor with state-dependent genetic and environmental covariates. RISK ANALYSIS : AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SOCIETY FOR RISK ANALYSIS 2014; 34:367-379. [PMID: 24111840 DOI: 10.1111/risa.12116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Few studies have focused on the different roles risk factors play in the multistate temporal natural course of breast cancer. We proposed a three-state Markov regression model to predict the risk from free of breast cancer (FBC) to the preclinical screen-detectable phase (PCDP) and from the PCDP to the clinical phase (CP). We searched the initiators and promoters affecting onset and subsequent progression of breast tumor to build up a three-state temporal natural history model with state-dependent genetic and environmental covariates. This risk assessment model was applied to a 1 million Taiwanese women cohort. The proposed model was verified by external validation with another independent data set. We identified three kinds of initiators, including the BRCA gene, seven single nucleotides polymorphism, and breast density. ER, Ki-67, and HER-2 were found as promoters. Body mass index and age at first pregnancy both played a role. Among women carrying the BRCA gene, the 10-year predicted risk for the transition from FBC to CP was 25.83%, 20.31%, and 13.84% for the high-, intermediate-, and low-risk group, respectively. The corresponding figures were 1.55%, 1.22%, and 0.76% among noncarriers. The mean sojourn time of staying at the PCDP ranged from 0.82 years for the highest risk group to 6.21 years for the lowest group. The lack of statistical significance for external validation (x(4)2=5.30,p=0.26) revealed the adequacy of our proposed model. The three-state model with state-dependent covariates of initiators and promoters was proposed for achieving individually tailored screening and also for personalized clinical surveillance of early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Ying Wu
- Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
193
|
Ahmed M, Lalloo F, Evans DG. Update on genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 9:1103-13. [DOI: 10.1586/era.09.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
194
|
Kapoor A, Vogel VG. Prognostic factors for breast cancer and their use in the clinical setting. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 5:269-81. [PMID: 15877524 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.5.2.269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in US women today. This year, approximately 216,000 US women will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and another 60,000 with in situ disease. Numerous factors can quantify individual risks for breast cancer, guide therapy and predict outcome. This review focuses on the clinical, pathologic, molecular and genetic prognostic tools available for use in patients with breast cancer, and their impact on clinical decisions and treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avina Kapoor
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital, 300 Halket Street, Room 3524, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3180, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
195
|
Kim H, Choi DH. Distribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Asian Patients with Breast Cancer. J Breast Cancer 2013; 16:357-65. [PMID: 24454456 PMCID: PMC3893336 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2013.16.4.357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2013] [Accepted: 09/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in Asian females, and the incidence of breast cancer has been increasing in Asia. Because Asian patients develop breast cancer at a younger age than their Caucasian counterparts, the contributions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations in Asians are expected to be different than in Caucasians. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in the Asian population varies among countries and studies. Most Asian studies have reported more frequent mutations in BRCA2 than in BRCA1, with the exception of studies from India and Pakistan. In addition, the contribution of large genomic rearrangements of BRCA1/2 genes is relatively small in Asian populations in comparison to other ethnic populations. Various statistical models for the prediction of BRCA1/2 mutations have underestimated the risk of having these genetic mutations in Asians, especially in predicting BRCA2 gene mutation. Until recently, BRCA1/2 mutation analyses in Asia were mostly conducted by independent single institutions with different patient selection criteria and using various genotyping methods. However, a couple of Asian groups have initiated nationwide studies collecting BRCA1/2 mutational data. These national collaborative studies will help a comprehensive understanding of the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in the Asian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haeyoung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Doo Ho Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Maxwell KN, Nathanson KL. Common breast cancer risk variants in the post-COGS era: a comprehensive review. Breast Cancer Res 2013; 15:212. [PMID: 24359602 PMCID: PMC3978855 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer has a strong heritable component, with approximately 15% of cases exhibiting a family history of the disease. Mutations in genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 lead to autosomal dominant inherited cancer susceptibility and confer a high lifetime risk of breast cancers. Identification of mutations in these genes through clinical genetic testing enables patients to undergo screening and prevention strategies, some of which provide overall survival benefit. In addition, a number of mutant alleles have been identified in genes such as CHEK2, PALB2, ATM and BRIP1, which often display incomplete penetrance and confer moderate lifetime risks of breast cancer. Studies are underway to determine how to use the identification of mutations in these genes to guide clinical practice. Altogether, however, mutations in high and moderate penetrance genes probably account for approximately 25% of familial breast cancer risk; the remainder may be due to mutations in as yet unidentified genes or lower penetrance variants. Common low penetrance alleles, which have been mainly identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), are generally present at 10 to 50% population frequencies and confer less than 1.5-fold increases in breast cancer risk. A number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified and risk associations extensively replicated in populations of European ancestry, the number of which has substantially increased as a result of GWAS performed by the Collaborative Oncological Gene–environment Study consortium. It is now estimated that 28% of familial breast cancer risk is explained by common breast cancer susceptibility loci. In some cases, SNP associations may be specific to different subsets of women with breast cancer, as defined by ethnicity or estrogen receptor status. Although not yet clinically established, it is hoped that identification of common risk variants may eventually allow identification of women at higher risk of breast cancer and enable implementation of breast cancer screening, prevention or treatment strategies that provide clinical benefit.
Collapse
|
197
|
Ayub SG, Rasool S, Ayub T, Khan SN, Wani KA, Andrabi KI. Mutational analysis of the BRCA2 gene in breast carcinoma patients of Kashmiri descent. Mol Med Rep 2013; 9:749-53. [PMID: 24337145 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2013] [Accepted: 11/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer demonstrates geographical and ethnic variation in its incidence reflecting the effect of local environmental conditions and lifestyle. The genesis of the disease has further been complexed by the involvement of a number of genes with small effects and above all by population heterogeneity. Accordingly, variations in genes, including breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1)/breast cancer 2, early onset (BRCA2), that have been markedly associated with the breast cancer phenotype exhibit a scattered mutational pattern in different populations. The present study was aimed to analyze the sequence variations in BRCA2 gene in a case control manner in ethnically pure Kashmiri population using PCR. Sequencing of BRCA2 exons revealed the presence of five sequence variations, four of which present in exon 11 alone were somatic and one was germline located in the U-terminal region (UTR) of exon 2. Out of these, the two somatic mutations comprised of substitutions, one representing a missense mutation leading to an amino-acid substitution at codon 991 and the other was a silent mutation at codon 1131, whereas the other two mutations located in exon 11 represented a loss of polymorphism. Codons for amino acid position 846 and 868 were demonstrated to be heterozygous polymorphic variants in 66% of the normal breast tissue samples, whereas the heterozygous polymorphic variant codons at the two loci were replaced by a homozygous genotype in associated tumor tissue in 88% of cases. These two mutations were always linked. Germline variation observed in exon 2 was located in the UTR region at contig position 13870572 (rs1799943). Other screened exons of BRCA2 did not demonstrate any sequence variation. These variations may contribute to breast cancer susceptibility along with variations in other low penetrating genes in sporadic types of breast cancer in this cohort of the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shabhat Rasool
- Department of Biotechnology, University of Kashmir, Kashmir 190006, India
| | - Taha Ayub
- Government Medical College, Srinagar 190010, India
| | - Saquib Naveed Khan
- Department of Accident and Emergency, Sheri‑Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190011, India
| | - Khursheed Alam Wani
- Department of Surgery, Sheri‑Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 190011, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
198
|
Ahmadinejad N, Movahedinia S, Movahedinia S, Shahriari M. Association of mammographic density with pathologic findings. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL 2013; 15:e16698. [PMID: 24693404 PMCID: PMC3955519 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.16698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2013] [Revised: 06/25/2013] [Accepted: 08/27/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and is the first cause of death due to cancer among women. Mammography is the best screening method and mammographic density, which determines the percentage of fibro glandular tissue of breast, is one of the strongest risk factors of breast cancer. Because benign and malignant lesions may present as dense lesions in mammography so it is necessary to take a core biopsy of any suspicious lesions to evaluate pathologic findings. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the association between mammographic density and histopathological findings in Iranian population. Moreover, we assessed the correlation between mammographic density and protein expression profile. We indeed, determined the accuracy and positive predictive value and negative predictive value of mammographic reports in our center. Patients and Method This study is a cross-sectional study carried out among 131 eligible women who had referred to imaging center for mammographic examination and had been advised to take biopsy of breast tissue. All participants of the study had filled out the informed consent. Pathologic review was performed blinded to the density status. Patients were divided into low density breast tissue group (ACR density group 1-2) and high density breast tissue group (ACR 3, 4) and data was compared between these two groups. Statistical analysis performed using SPSS for windows, version 11.5. We used chi-square, t-test, and logistic regression test for analysis and Odds Ratio calculated where indicated. Results In patients with high breast densities, malignant cases (61.2%) were significantly more in comparison to patients with low breast densities (37.3%) (P= 0.007, OR=2.66 95% CI=1.29-5.49). After adjusting for age, density was associated with malignancy in age groups <46 years (P=0.007), and 46-60 years (P=0.024) but not in age group >60yrs (P=0.559). Adjusting for menopausal status, density showed association with malignancy in both pre-menopause (P=0.041) and menopause (P=0.010) patients. Using logistic regression test, only age and density showed independent association with risk of breast cancer. No association was found between density and protein profile expression. Mammographic method has a false negative percent of 10.3% for negative BI-RADS group and a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 69.6% for positive BI-RADS group. PPVs for BI-RADS 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 were 16%, 87.5%, 84.6%, and 91.5% respectively. NPVs for BI-RADS 1, 2 and 3 were 66.7%, 95.8% and 90.0% respectively. Conclusions In this study we found that increasing in mammographic density is associated with an increase in malignant pathology reports. Expression of ER, PR and HER-2 receptors didn't show association with density. Our mammographic reports had a sensitivity of 94.1% and a specificity of 55.6%, which shows that our mammography is an acceptable method for screening breast cancer in this center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasrin Ahmadinejad
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, IR Iran
| | - Samaneh Movahedinia
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, IR Iran
| | - Sajjadeh Movahedinia
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, IR Iran
- Corresponding Author: Sajjadeh Movahedinia, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98-2166581577, E-mail:
| | - Mona Shahriari
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, IR Iran
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Meyer S, Tischkowitz M, Chandler K, Gillespie A, Birch JM, Evans DG. Fanconi anaemia, BRCA2 mutations and childhood cancer: a developmental perspective from clinical and epidemiological observations with implications for genetic counselling. J Med Genet 2013; 51:71-5. [PMID: 24259538 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Fanconi anaemia (FA) is an inherited condition characterised by congenital and developmental abnormalities and a strong cancer predisposition. In around 3-5% of cases FA is caused by biallelic mutations in the BRCA2 gene. Individuals heterozygous for BRCA2 mutations have an increased risk of inherited breast and ovarian cancer. We reviewed the mutation spectrum in BRCA2-associated FA, and the spectrum and frequency of BRCA2 mutations in distinct populations. The rarity of FA due to biallelic BRCA2 mutations supports a fundamental role of BRCA2 for prevention of malignant transformation during development. The spectrum of malignancies seen associated with FA support the concept of a tissue selectivity of BRCA2 mutations for development of FA-associated cancers. This specificity is illustrated by the distinct FA-associated BRCA2 mutations that appear to predispose to specific brain or haematological malignancies. For some populations, the number of FA-patients with biallelic BRCA2 disruption is smaller than that expected from the carrier frequency, and this implies that some pregnancies with biallelic BRCA2 mutations do not go to term. The apparent discrepancy between expected and observed incidence of BRCA2 mutation-associated FA in high-frequency carrier populations has important implications for the genetic counselling of couples with recurrent miscarriages from high-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Meyer
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
200
|
Karami F, Mehdipour P. A comprehensive focus on global spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2013; 2013:928562. [PMID: 24312913 PMCID: PMC3838820 DOI: 10.1155/2013/928562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2013] [Revised: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 08/15/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer of women all over the world. BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations comprise the most important genetic susceptibility of BC. Except for few common mutations, the spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is heterogeneous in diverse populations. 185AGdel and 5382insC are the most important BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations which have been encountered in most of the populations. After those Ashkenazi founder mutations, 300T>G also demonstrated sparse frequency in African American and European populations. This review affords quick access to the most frequent alterations among various populations which could be helpful in BRCA screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Karami
- Department of Medical Genetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parvin Mehdipour
- Department of Medical Genetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|