The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases

The influence of sentinel lymph node tumour burden on additional lymph node involvement and disease-free survival in cutaneous melanoma--a retrospective analysis of 392 cases

Twenty per cent of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma patients have positive non-SLN lymph nodes in completion lymph node dissection (CLND). We investigated SLN tumour load, non-sentinel positivity and disease-free survival (DFS) to assess whether certain patients could be spared CLND. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed on 392 patients between 1999 and 2005. Median observation period was 38.8 months. Sentinel lymph node tumour load did not predict non-SLN positivity: 30.8% of patients with SLN macrometastases (> or =2 mm) and 16.4% with micrometastases (< or =2 mm) had non-SLN positivity (P=0.09). Tumour recurrences after positive SLNs were more than twice as frequent for SLN macrometastases (51.3%) than for micrometastases (24.6%) (P=0.005). For patients with SLN micrometastases, the DFS analysis was worse (P=0.003) when comparing those with positive non-SLNs (60% recurrences) to those without (17.6% recurrences). This difference did not translate into significant differences in DFS: patients with SLN micrometastasis, either with (P=0.022) or without additional positive non-SLNs (P<0.0001), fared worse than patients with tumour-free SLNs. The 2-mm cutoff for SLN tumour load accurately predicts differences in DFS. Non-SLN positivity in CLND, however, cannot be predicted. Therefore, contrary to other studies, no recommendations concerning discontinuation of CLND based on SLN tumour load can be deduced.

Confirmation of sentinel lymph node identity by analysis of fine-needle biopsy samples using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry

Background

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy technique is a reliable means of determining the tumor-harboring status of regional lymph nodes in melanoma patients. When technetium 99 m-labeled antimony trisulfide colloid (^99 mTc-Sb₂S₃) particles are used to perform preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for SLN identification, they are retained in the SLN but are absent or present in only tiny amounts in non-SLNs. The present study investigated the potential for a novel means of assessing the accuracy of surgical identification of SLNs. This involved the use of inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to analyze antimony concentrations in fine-needle biopsy (FNB) samples from surgically procured lymph nodes.

Methods

A total of 47 FNB samples from surgically excised lymph nodes (32 SLNs and 15 non-SLNs) were collected. The SLNs were localized by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy that used ^99 mTc-Sb₂S_3, blue dye, and gamma probe techniques. The concentrations of antimony were measured in the FNB samples by ICP-MS.

Results

The mean and median antimony concentrations (in parts per billion) were .898 and .451 in the SLNs, and .015 and .068 in the non-SLNs, the differences being highly statistically significant (P < .00005).

Conclusions

Our results show that ICP-MS analysis of antimony concentrations in FNB specimens from lymph nodes can accurately confirm the identity of SLNs. Used in conjunction with techniques such as proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the nonsurgical evaluation of SLNs, ICP-MS analysis of antimony concentrations in FNB samples could potentially serve as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery and histopathologic evaluation to objectively classify a given node as sentinel or nonsentinel and determine its tumor-harboring status.

Fine-needle biopsy as a diagnostic technique for metastatic melanoma

Fine-needle biopsy (FNB) is a rapid, minimally invasive technique, widely used for the investigation and diagnosis of lesions in a variety of body sites. It is a procedure with high diagnostic accuracy for metastatic melanoma, with a sensitivity of 92.1% and a specificity of 99.2% in a recent large study. Although at present FNB has virtually no role in the initial diagnosis of pigmented primary cutaneous tumors, recent evidence suggests that it should be the first-line diagnostic modality for confirmation of clinically and/or radiologically suspected metastases in melanoma patients. As the specimen procured by FNB can be examined within minutes of performing the procedure, an on-demand FNB service with rapid communication of results to the patient's treating clinician enables a more efficient and cost effective approach to the multidisciplinary management of melanoma patients. In the future, it is likely that molecular analysis of very small amounts of tumor tissue obtained by FNB will provide an accurate estimate of prognosis and will facilitate selection of patients who may benefit from targeted molecular therapies.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma

PURPOSE

To assess the importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

Ninety consecutive non-randomized patients with stages I and II melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy were followed up prospectively for six years.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for a mean period of 30 months. Their mean age was 53.3 years, ranging from 12 to 83 years. Thirty patients were male (37.5%) and 50, female (62.5%). Sentinel lymph node was positive in 32.5% and negative in 67.5%. It was found that the thicker the tumor, the greater the incidence of positive sentinel lymph nodes. In the group of patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes, recurrence occurred in 43.5%, but in those with negative sentinel lymph nodes, in only 7%, what points out to the association of tumor recurrence and positive sentinel lymph nodes. There were no major postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy was demonstrated to be a safe method for selecting patients who need therapeutic lymphadenectomy.

The role of ThinPrep cytology in the investigation of SLN status in patients with cutaneous melanoma

INTRODUCTION

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in melanoma assesses reliably the status of the regional lymph node basins, provides valuable prognostic information, facilitates early therapeutic lymphadenectomy and identifies patients who are candidates for different adjuvant treatments. The current study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of cytological specimens being placed in PreservCyt as a practical collection methodology for performing evaluation of the SLN status in patients with melanomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2006, 70 patients with histologically confirmed cutaneous melanoma underwent intraoperative FNA biopsy of the SLN. After identification of the SLN(s), FNA biopsy of the SLN was performed with a 0.6 mm (23 gauge) diameter needle. All the SLNs specimens were examined (using light microscopy 40 x and 200 x) by the same pathologist and cytopathologist, neither of had any knowledge of the medical history of the patient. The histological result of the excised SLN was considered as the final diagnosis.

RESULTS

The unsatisfactory rate for TP cytology was 2.17%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy (OA) for the TP technique were 92.31%, 100%, 100%, 97.06%, and 97.83%, respectively. Using TP cytology, there was greater intensity and distribution of the staining in comparison with immunohistochemistry.

DISCUSSION

The accuracy of TP technique in the evaluation of the SLN status is comparable to those of the histological evaluation, and could be of paramount importance for the preoperative planning of treatment.

Sentinel node for gastrointestinal malignancies

Sentinel node (SN) concept is valid in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. The dual tracer method with radio-guided and dye-guided SN mapping is feasible in GI malignancies and is useful in detecting unexpected aberrant drainage routes from GI cancers. SN mapping enabled us to perform individualized and step-wise lymphadenectomy in patients with GI cancer. A combination of SN mapping and endoscopic surgery will contribute to the improvement in quality of life after surgical treatment of GI cancer.

Prediction of non-sentinel node status and outcome in sentinel node-positive melanoma patients

AIMS

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) -positive melanoma patients are usually recommended completion lymph node dissection (CLND) with the aim to provide regional disease control and improve survival. Nevertheless, only 20% these patients have additional metastases in non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN), indicating that CLND may be unnecessary in the majority of patients. In this retrospective study, we (i) sought to identify clinico-pathological features predicting NSLN status, as well as disease-free (DFS) and -specific (DSS) survival and (ii) evaluated the applicability of previously published algorithms, which were able to define a group of patients at zero-risk for NSLN-metastasis.

METHODS

This analysis included 504 consecutive melanoma patients stage I and II who underwent successful SLN-biopsy (SLNB) at our institute between 1998 and 2005. Metastatic SLN were re-evaluated for tumor burden and categorized according to two different micro-anatomic classifications and the S/U-score (Size of the sentinel node metastasis > 2 mm/Ulceration of the primary melanoma) was assessed. DFS and DSS were calculated for all analyses.

RESULTS

Out of 504 melanoma patients stage I or II, 85 (17%) were SLN-positive and 18 of 85 (21%) were found with positive NSLN in the CLND specimen. Median follow-up was 31 months. Neither primary tumor characteristics (age, gender, Clark level, Breslow thickness, ulceration of the primary melanoma, site and histological subtype of the primary melanoma), nor features of the sentinel node tumor (number and site of draining lymph node basins, number of positive sentinel nodes and size of sentinel node tumor (< 2 mm vs. > or = 2 mm) were able to predict additional positive lymph nodes in the CLND specimen. Likewise the implementation of published algorithms was not able to identify patients at negligible risk for harboring NSLN metastases. Upon univariate analysis, disease-free survival in SLN-positive patients was correlated with Breslow thickness, sentinel node tumor size > 2 mm and S/U score. In respect to disease-specific survival the significant prognostic parameters were Breslow thickness, ulceration, sentinel node tumor size > 2 mm and the S/U score. After a median follow-up of 31 months recurrence rates (37% vs. 78%, p=0.02) and death from disease (24% vs. 50%, p<0.01) were significantly different in patients with SLN-metastasis only as compared to patients with NSLN-metastasis.

CONCLUSION

NSLN status cannot be predicted in this data analysis by using clinico-pathological characteristics. Therefore, CLND is recommended for all patients after positive SLNB pending the results of the second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial.

Regional Nodal Metastatic Disease Is the Strongest Predictor of Survival in Patients with Thin Vertical Growth Phase Melanomas: A Case for SLN Staging Biopsy in These Patients

BACKGROUND

The benefit of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for patients with thin (< or =1.0 mm) melanomas, even for prognostic value, is controversial. This may partly result from the relatively small number and short follow-up of SLN-positive patients in this group. Previously, we have shown that clinical regional nodal metastatic disease (RNMD) serves as a good surrogate for SLN positivity. Here, we use RNMD as a validated surrogate for SLN positivity and examine its prognostic value in a large pre-SLN group of patients with thin vertical growth phase (VGP) lesions who would today commonly be offered SLN biopsy in our practice.

METHODS

Between 1972 and 1991, 472 patients with thin VGP melanomas with at least 10 years' follow-up were eligible for the study. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were computed for patients with and without RNMD. A multivariate Cox model and classification tree analysis were used to evaluate clinical and histopathologic predictors of survival.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (14.2%) developed recurrence, 53.7% of whom developed RNMD. Forty-five patients (9.5%) experienced melanoma-related deaths (MRD). The most statistically significant predictor of MRD was RNMD (hazard ratio [HR] 13.5, P < .0001). Thickness (HR 10.5, P = .004), axial location (HR 4.6, P = .001), and age >60 years (HR 2.7, P = .005) additionally were independently associated with an increased risk of MRD. RNMD patients demonstrated a 44.4% 10-year disease-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

RNMD was the most statistically significant factor associated with MRD in patients with thin VGP lesions. This supports the prognostic use of SLN biopsy in this group, recognizing that additional factors, including thickness, axial location, and older age were independently associated with a worse survival outcome.

Lymphoscintigraphy in detection of the regional lymph node involvement in gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Involvement of regional lymph node is a critical sign in prognosis of gastric cancer. Radiological techniques are commonly used to evaluate the extension of gastric cancer. But their sensitivity and specificity are low especially in the early stage. Our aim was to assess the value of gastric lymphoscintigraphy in identifying regional lymph node involvement in patients with gastric cancer, as compared to the abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography and postoperative histopathological evaluation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

50 patients (12 females) with a median age of 61 years (range, 35-73 years) were included in the study. Pre-operative staging in all cases included upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy, followed by ultrasound, computed tomography and lymphoscintigraphy. 148 MBq Technetium-99m lymphoscint was injected around the tumour during endoscopy and immediately after injection, anterior, lateral and posterior images were taken in 5-min intervals using a gamma camera. Findings were compared to the findings of other tests. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each test were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Histologically, 68% of cases (34/50) had metastasis in regional lymph nodes and all cases were accurately diagnosed by lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphoscintigraphy was significantly more sensitive for detecting lymph node involvement (P < 0.01). Both abdominal ultrasonography and CT had very low sensitivity in identifying lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphoscintigraphy is a promising test in the identification of regional lymph nodes pre-operatively in patients with gastric cancer. It might help the surgeon to plan the extent of dissection before surgery which may decrease postoperative complications related to unnecessary extensive lymph node dissection.

Sentinel Node Mapping for Melanoma: Results of Trials and Current Applications

The value of sentinel node (SN) biopsy as a staging procedure and as a guide to prognosis with patients who have melanoma is now clearly established. As well, there is recent clinical trial evidence suggesting a survival benefit for patients found to be SN positive who have an immediate complete lymph node dissection (CLND), compared with those with nodal disease not treated by CLND until it becomes clinically apparent. Clinical trials are ongoing to determine whether CLND is necessary in all patients who are found to be SN positive.

What is a sentinel node? Re-evaluating the 10% rule for sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Many surgeons use the "10% rule" to define whether a lymph node is a sentinel node (SLN) when staging malignant melanoma. However, this increases the number of SLN removed and the time and cost of the procedure. We examined the impact of raising this threshold on the accuracy of the procedure.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 561 patients with melanoma (624 basins) who underwent SLN with technetium Tc99 labeled sulfur colloid using a definition of a SLN as 10% of that of the node with the highest counts per minute (CPM).

RESULTS

Of the 624 basins, 154 (25%) were positive for metastases. An average of 1.9 nodes per basin were removed (range 1-6). Metastases were found in the hottest node in 137 cases (89% of positive basins, 97% of basins overall). Increasing the threshold above 10% decreased the number of nodes excised and the costs involved, but incrementally raised the number of false negative cases above baseline (a 4% increase for a "20% rule," 5% for a "30% rule," 6% for a "40% rule," and 7% for a "50% rule"). Taking only the hottest node would raise the false negative rate by 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although using thresholds higher than 10% for the definition of a SLN will minimize the extent of surgery and decrease the costs associated with the procedure, it will compromise the accuracy of the procedure and is not recommended.

Preclinical models of regional lymph node tumor metastasis

Animal models have produced vital information regarding the mechanisms of RLN metastasis. Modern imaging and molecular techniques have made it clear that growing tumors secrete cytokines that induce invasion, angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, increased intratumoral IFV and IFP, increased fluid flow from the tumor to the surrounding tissues, increased lymphatic flow, an increase in the rate of entry of tumor cells into lymphatic capillaries, and an increased number of tumor cells reaching the RLN(s). This is important knowledge that will help direct translational research in human patients. We can look forward to continued improvement in the management of human tumors that metastasize to the RLNs.

Accuracy of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous wide local excision in patients with primary melanoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is the most important prognostic factor with respect to the survival of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. However, lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsies (LM/SLNBs) performed in patients who have had a wide local excision (WLE) may not accurately reflect the pathologic status of the draining lymph node basins. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of LM/SLNB in patients who have had a previous WLE.

METHODS

A single-institution database was examined to identify patients who had a WLE before LM/SLNB and patients who had a concomitant LM/SLNB. Primary clinicopathologic features (age, tumor thickness, and ulceration), SLN identification rate, SLN pathologic status, and the incidence and sites of recurrences were compared between patients with and without prior WLE.

RESULTS

Of the 1395 patients identified, 104 had WLE before LM/SLNB. The mean preoperative WLE radial margin was 1.4 cm (median, 1.0 cm). LM/SLNB was successful in 103 of 104 (99%) patients. Age, tumor thickness, incidence of ulceration, and incidence of SLN positivity in the group with prior WLE were similar to those of the cohort of patients who had concomitant LM/SLNB and WLE (n = 1291). In 97 (93%) of the 104 prior-WLE patients, the surgical defects were closed by either primary closure or skin graft; 7 patients (7%) had rotational flaps. The median follow-up of these 104 patients was 51 months. Among the prior-WLE group, 19 patients (18%) had a positive SLNB; of these 19 patients, 4 (21%) had recurrences (3 distant failures and 1 local and distant failure). There were no lymph node recurrences-in a mapped or unmapped basin-in these 104 patients with a negative or positive SLNB.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNs can be successfully identified and accurately reflect the status of the regional lymph node basin in carefully selected melanoma patients with a previous WLE. Prior WLE does not appear to adversely impact the ability to detect lymphatic metastases, although the utility of LM/SLNB in patients who have undergone extensive reconstruction of the primary excision site remains to be defined. Because more extensive surgery may be required to accomplish accurate lymph node staging in patients who have undergone prior WLE-including the possible removal of SLNs from additional lymph node basins and an additional surgical procedure-to minimize morbidity and cost, concomitant WLE and LM/SLNB is strongly preferred whenever possible.

Gastroesophageal carcinoma: individualized surgical therapy

During the twentieth century, surgical management of gastroesophageal carcinoma was developed by an establishment of standard procedures with lymph node dissection according to the metastatic distribution. The "fear" of invisible micrometastasis caused surgeons to perform more aggressive resection with lymphadenectomy to control the disease locally. Although several promising results of extensive lymph node dissection have been reported, the prognostic benefits of extensive surgery have not been proven by prospective randomized trials. A novel technology to detect micrometastasis without extensive surgical resection is required to gastroesophageal carcinoma. The lymphatic mapping technique is one of the attractive candidates for a novel tool to approach this issue.

Histological features of melanoma sentinel lymph node metastases associated with status of the completion lymphadenectomy and rate of subsequent relapse

BACKGROUND

The current recommendation for patients with cutaneous melanoma and a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a completion lymph node dissection (CLND). This study sought to define a population of SLN-positive patients, based on their histological pattern of SLN metastases, who may not require CLND.

METHODS

All patients with SLN-positive cutaneous melanoma who underwent CLND between March 1999 and December 2004 at a single academic institution were enrolled. Metastatic deposits in the SLN were categorized by their histological zone of involvement (subcapsular, parenchymal and/or sinusoidal). Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of SLN zone, size of nodal metastases, and other histological factors on CLND positivity. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to study disease recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients were included, and 15.8% had positive non-sentinel nodes. In adjusted analyses, the size of the largest tumor deposit in the SLN was the only factor associated with CLND status. No patients with a tumor deposit <or=0.20 mm had a positive CLND. Although a specific zone of tumor involvement was not predictive of CLND status, involvement of all three zones was independently associated with increased recurrence. Size of the largest tumor deposit was also associated with recurrence, with no recurrences in patients with nodal deposits <or=0.20 mm.

CONCLUSION

Histologic features of tumor metastases in positive SLN may be useful in defining a population of patients who may be spared CLND and a group at high risk of recurrence.

The Reproducibility in Routine Clinical Practice of Sentinel Lymph Node Identification by Pre-operative Lymphoscintigraphy in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma

Pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy (LS) is an important part of successful sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in most melanoma treatment centers. The test accurately maps lymphatic drainage from cutaneous melanoma sites and has been shown to be reproducible in prospective studies. Its reproducibility has not been tested, however, in routine clinical practice. Occasionally, after LS has been performed to map the location of SLNs, the patient is unable to proceed to SLN biopsy surgery within the time limit imposed by the radioactive decay of the 99mTc label attached to the colloid particles. In this situation, the surgery is rescheduled and LS repeated to relabel the SLNs so that they may be accurately biopsied. This has happened on 21 occasions at the Sydney Melanoma Unit and we have performed a retrospective analysis of the reproducibility of the LS results. In 19 patients, the same SLNs were shown in the same locations on the two studies. Two patients had discrepant results. One showed two extra interval nodes on the back as well as concordant flow to SLNs in each axilla. The other with a leg melanoma showed the same groin SLNs but failed to relabel the two popliteal SLNs on the second study. SLN locations were identical during 95%, and SLNs were identical 94% of the time. These results indicate that in routine clinical practice LS is a highly reproducible procedure to locate and radiolabel the SLNs prior to biopsy in patients with melanoma.

A preliminary study of the draining lymph node basin in advanced lower rectal cancer using a radioactive tracer

PURPOSE

This study was designed to examine the draining lymph node basin at highest risk of metastasis in lower rectal cancer using 99 mTc-tin colloid.

METHODS

In 43 patients, the area with highest hot nodes density was defined as the draining lymph node basin using a gamma probe. Metastatic states of all removed lymph nodes were examined histologically.

RESULTS

A total of 203 hot nodes were identified in 39 patients (91 percent) with a mean of 5.2 nodes. The number of removed lymph nodes was 808 nodes: 670 nodes in the mesorectum, and 138 nodes in the pelvis. In 21 patients, the metastatic states of 119 nodes were investigated histologically. From the distribution of the identified hot nodes, the draining lymph node basins were classified into two patterns: lateral type (n = 17), and mesorectal type (n = 22). Only 20 (17 percent) of 119 positive nodes were identified as hot node. Tumor cells that occupied the lymph node diffusely or massively probably interfered with the exact diagnosis of metastasis. Lymph node metastasis in the pelvis was observed in 5 patients (13 percent). One false negative was of the mesorectal type with diffuse metastases in the para-aortic lymph nodes. The remaining four patients were of the lateral type and all positive lymph nodes, including positive nonhot nodes, were located within the draining lymph node basin. Consequently, in 20 (95.2 percent) of 21 patients with lymph node metastasis, all positive lymph nodes were located within the draining lymph node basin of the tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Two types of the draining lymph node basin of advanced lower rectal cancer were identified using this method. The concordance between lymph node metastases and the draining lymph node basin is good.

Clinical relevance of melanoma micrometastases (<0.1 mm) in sentinel nodes: are these nodes to be considered negative?

As only about 20% of sentinel node (SN) positive melanoma patients have additional non-SN lymph node involvement in the Completion Lymph Node Dissection (CLND) specimen, we tried to identify a SN positive patient group, which can be spared CLND. Micro anatomic analyses of metastatic SNs were performed to identify patient/tumor and/or SN factors predicting additional non-SN positivity as well as disease-free and overall survival. SN positivity was found in 77 of 262 stage I/II patients, included into a prospective database (10/97-5/04). Of 74 patients pathology material was available for re-evaluation. Micro anatomic analyses categorized topography of SN-metastases, Starz classification and amount of SN tumor burden. Additional non-SN positivity, DFS, OS and was calculated for all analyses. Mean Breslow thickness was 3.5 mm (0.8-12.0); mean FU was 35 (6-81) months. There was no additional non-SN positivity for SN-micrometastases <0.1 mm. Topography of SN involvement had no impact on OS. Estimated 5-year OS rates for the different groups of <0.1 mm, 0.1-1.0 mm and >1.0 mm SN tumor burden were 100%, 63% and 35% respectively. Distant metastases were exceedingly rare (1/16 = 6.3%) in <0.1 mm SN-positive patients. On multivariate analysis the SN tumor burden was the most important prognostic factor for DFS (P = 0.005) and OS (P = 0.03). Distant metastasis-free survival was identical (91%) to the 5-yr OS of SN negative patients, the estimated 5-yr OS was 100% for these patients and additional non-SN positivity was not observed. Therefore, our data suggest that patients with sub-micrometastases (<0.1 mm) in the SN may be judged as SN negative, as non-stage III, and are highly unlikely to benefit from CLND, which we no longer recommend.

Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the contribution of sentinel-node biopsy to outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with a primary cutaneous melanoma were randomly assigned to wide excision and postoperative observation of regional lymph nodes with lymphadenectomy if nodal relapse occurred, or to wide excision and sentinel-node biopsy with immediate lymphadenectomy if nodal micrometastases were detected on biopsy.

RESULTS

Among 1269 patients with an intermediate-thickness primary melanoma, the mean (+/-SE) estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate for the population was 78.3+/-1.6% in the biopsy group and 73.1+/-2.1% in the observation group (hazard ratio for recurrence[corrected], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.93; P=0.009). Five-year melanoma-specific survival rates were similar in the two groups (87.1+/-1.3% and 86.6+/-1.6%, respectively). In the biopsy group, the presence of metastases in the sentinel node was the most important prognostic factor; the 5-year survival rate was 72.3+/-4.6% among patients with tumor-positive sentinel nodes and 90.2+/-1.3% among those with tumor-negative sentinel nodes (hazard ratio for death, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.54 to 3.98; P<0.001). The incidence of sentinel-node micrometastases was 16.0% (122 of 764 patients), and the rate of nodal relapse in the observation group was 15.6% (78 of 500 patients). The corresponding mean number of tumor-involved nodes was 1.4 in the biopsy group and 3.3 in the observation group (P<0.001), indicating disease progression during observation. Among patients with nodal metastases, the 5-year survival rate was higher among those who underwent immediate lymphadenectomy than among those in whom lymphadenectomy was delayed (72.3+/-4.6% vs. 52.4+/-5.9%; hazard ratio for death, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.81; P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The staging of intermediate-thickness (1.2 to 3.5 mm) primary melanomas according to the results of sentinel-node biopsy provides important prognostic information and identifies patients with nodal metastases whose survival can be prolonged by immediate lymphadenectomy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00275496 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Clinical and Therapeutic Importance of Sentinel Node Biopsy of the Internal Mammary Chain in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Study with Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the incidence of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in the internal mammary chain, calculated the lymphoscintigraphy and surgical detection rates, and evaluated the clinical effect on staging and the therapeutic approach in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

The study involved 741 women diagnosed with breast cancer eligible for the SLN technique. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed on the day before the operation by peritumoral injection of (99m)Tc-labeled nanocolloid. During the operation, a gamma probe was used to detect the SLN, which was then removed.

RESULTS

A total of 719 SLNs were found in the axillary chain and 72 in the internal mammary chain. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showed 107 hot spots in the internal mammary chain, but only 72 SLNs in 65 patients were identified by the gamma probe and then removed with no complications. Of these 65 patients, 10 had a positive internal mammary chain SLN on final pathologic examination, whereas 55 patients had >or=1 negative SLNs on final pathologic analysis. Thirty-five (53%) of 65 patients had also an axillary SLN, but only 5 patients (8%) had a positive SLN on pathologic analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of the SLNs in the internal mammary chain may provide more accurate staging in breast cancer patients. If an internal mammary sampling is not performed, patients may be understaged. This technique may allow better selection of those patients who will be submitted to adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy.

Morbidity after inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Aim of the study was to assess the short-term and long-term morbidity after inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with or without completion groin dissection (GD) in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2003, 127 inguinal SLNBs were performed for cutaneous melanoma. Sixty-six patients, median age 50 (18-77) years, met the inclusion criteria and were studied. Short-term complications were analysed retrospectively, while long-term complications were evaluated using volume measurement and range of motion measurement of the lower extremities.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent SLNB alone (SLNB group) and 14 patients underwent completion groin dissection after tumour-positive SLNB (SLNB/GD group). Morbidity after SLNB alone: wound infections (n=1), seroma (n=1), postoperative bleeding (n=1), erysipelas (n=1), and slight lymphedema 6% (n=3). Morbidity after SLNB/GD: wound infections (n=4), seroma (n=1), wound necrosis (n=1), postoperative bleeding (n=1), and slight lymphedema 64% (n=9). There were differences between the two groups in the total number of short-term complications (p<0.001), volume difference (p<0.001), flexion (p=0.009), and abduction (p=0.011) limitation of the hip joint.

CONCLUSION

Inguinal SLNB is accompanied with a low complication rate. However, SLNB followed by groin dissection is associated with an increased risk of wound infection and slight lymphedema.

Paradigm Shift of Staging and Treatment for Early Breast Cancer in the Sentinel Lymph Node Era

Lymph node status is the most reliable prognostic indicator for the clinical outcome of patients with most solid cancers. Because it is the first node draining the primary cancer, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is most likely to harbor metastatic cancer cells. The tumor size of primary breast cancer is highly correlated with SLN metastasis. If the SLN is negative, the negative predictive value of the remaining nodal basin exceeds 95%. It appears that even using different techniques from different institutions, the successful rate to harvest the SLN is more than 95%. The false-negative rate is about 5-10% in most series. Breast cancer patients with early detection and a negative SLN have a significantly improved survival rate. The SLN data in breast cancer is so convincing that SLN information has been incorporated into the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification of breast cancer. The therapeutic value of additional lymph node dissection after a positive SLN for breast cancer is still controversial. Follow-up data from breast cancer patients is somewhat limited, but available information shows that patients with negative SLNs fare much better. In summary, several important patterns of metastasis can be established based on the current SLN experience: 1) The earlier the breast cancer is found, the less the metastatic potential. 2) In most cases, breast cancer follows an orderly progression of metastasis to the SLN. 3) A small subgroup of patients may develop systemic dissemination without SLN involvement. Since metastatic cancer is usually incurable, it is important for oncologists to detect and resect an early breast cancer without delay. The challenge in the future will be to dissect these different patterns of metastasis based on molecular or genetic markers. Such information will be critical to select high-risk patients for adjuvant therapy.

Sentinel lymph node mapping with GI cancer

Precise evaluation of lymph node status is one of the most important factors in determining clinical outcome in treating gastro-intestinal (GI) cancer. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping clearly has become highly feasible and accurate in staging GI cancer. The lunchtime symposium focused on the present status of SLN mapping for GI cancer. Dr. Kitigawa proposed a new strategy using sentinel node biopsy for esophageal cancer patients with clinically early stage disease. Dr. Uenosono reported on whether the SLN concept is applicable for gastric cancer through his analysis of more than 180 patients with cT1-2, N0 tumors. The detection rate was 95%, the false negative rate of lymph node metastasis including micro-metastasis was 4%, and accuracy was 99% in gastric cancer patients with cT1N0. Dr. Bilchik recommended the best technique for identifying SLNs in colorectal cancer: a combination of radiotracer and blue dye method, emphasizing that this technique will become increasingly popular because of the SLN concept, with improvement in staging accuracy. He stressed that this novel procedure offers the potential for significant upstaging of GI cancer. Dr. Saha emphasized that SLN mapping for colorectal cancer is highly successful and accurate in predicting the presence or absence of nodal disease with a relatively low incidence of skip metastases. It provided the "right nodes" to the pathologists for detailed analysis for appropriate staging and treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Although more evidence from large-scale multicenter clinical trials is required, SLN mapping may be very useful for individualizing multi-modal treatment for esophageal cancer and might be widely acceptable even for GI cancer.

Clinical patterns of metastasis

In human solid cancer, lymph node status is the most important indicator for clinical outcome. Recent developments in the sentinel lymph node concept and technology have resulted in a more precise way of examining micrometastasis in the sentinel lymph node and the role of lymphovascular system in the facilitation of cancer metastasis. Different patterns of metastasis are described with respect to different types of solid cancer. Expect perhaps for papillary carcinoma and sarcoma, the overwhelming evidence is that solid cancer progresses in an orderly progression from the primary site to the regional lymph node or the sentinel lymph node in the majority of cases with subsequent dissemination to the systemic sites. The basic mechanisms of cancer metastasis through the lymphovascular system form the basis of rational therapy against cancer. Beyond the clinical patterns of metastasis, it is imperative to understand the biology of metastasis and to characterize patterns of metastasis perhaps due to heterogeneous clones based on their molecular signatures.

Molecular mechanisms of metastasis

A major topic covered at the First International Symposium on Cancer Metastasis and the Lymphovascular System was the molecular mechanisms of metastasis. This has become of major interest in recent years as we have discovered new metastasis-related genes and gained understanding of the molecular events of lymphatic metastasis. The symposium covered new aspects and important questions related to the events of metastasis in both humans and animals. The basic and clinical related research covered in this topic represented many disciplines. The presentations showed novel findings and at the same time, raised many new unanswered questions, indicating the limited knowledge we still have regarding the molecular events of metastasis. The hope is that further unraveling of the direct and indirect molecular events of lymphatic metastasis will lead to new approaches in developing effective therapeutics.

The unexpected sites of melanoma regional recurrences

Sentinel node biopsy is a means of identifying nodal involvement in melanoma and lymphoscintigraphy identifies unpredictable sites of melanoma sentinel nodes in up to 25% of cases. Whilst there is a dearth of recent publications in this area, it nevertheless remains an interesting observation that unpredictable sites of sentinel nodes are so common as to be accepted as normal. This study was performed to determine if this high rate of unpredictable lymphatic drainage was reflected in clinical practice, where therapeutic lymph node dissections were performed for pathologically confirmed regional disease.

METHODS

Patients undergoing regional lymph node dissections for histologically proven malignant melanoma were identified from a computer database. Patient details were analysed from case records.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-three case records were examined and 237 were suitable for analysis. The site of the primary was the head and neck in 50 (21%), trunk in 73 (31%), upper limb in 27 (11%) and lower limb in 87 (37%). In 15 cases (6%), the first site of regional disease was unpredictable. In these 15 cases, the site of the primary was the head and neck in two, trunk in 11, upper limb in one and lower limb in one. In 37 cases (16%), a subsequent site of nodal recurrence was unpredictable. Clinicians should be aware that patients with melanomas, particularly of the trunk, especially those in whom a therapeutic nodal dissection has been performed, may have nodal disease at unpredictable sites. However, unexpected sites of regional disease are not as common as sentinel node biopsy would suggest. Guidelines for lymph node examination in cutaneous melanoma are suggested based on these findings.

Use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and high-dose interferon in pediatric patients with high-risk melanoma: the Hospital for Sick Children experience

BACKGROUND

Melanoma comprises less than 3% of all cancers seen in children. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBX) is an important predictor of outcome in adult melanoma and has not been widely used in pediatrics. Furthermore, adjuvant interferon has only been rarely used in childhood high-risk disease.

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience with high-risk melanoma, the feasibility of SLNBX and the tolerance of high-dose interferon (HDI) therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma at our center over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were identified (median age of 12 y). Six of 10 patients who underwent SLNBX had disease in the lymph nodes and no complications from this procedure were observed. After complete lymph node dissection in these 6 patients, 1 developed wound infection and 2 had chronic lymph edema. Five patients were treated with adjuvant HDI of whom 2 patients required dose modification due to myelosuppression and liver toxicity. After a median follow-up of 26 months, 10 out of 11 patients are in remission.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNBX is feasible and safe in pediatric melanoma and offers the potential to identify patients at high risk for disease progression who could benefit from HDI.

Immunomodulation of the melanoma sentinel lymph node: a novel adjuvant therapeutic option

Cutaneous melanoma is the most aggressive type of skin cancer. Paradoxically, melanoma is also the most immunogenic tumour identified to date: tumour-reactive T cells are detectable both in the blood and in tumour-draining lymph nodes (TDLN) of melanoma patients and their frequency can be increased by specific vaccination. However, early melanoma development is accompanied by impaired immune effector functions in the initial TDLN, the sentinel lymph node (SLN). Most notably, a reduced frequency and activation state of dendritic cells (DC) interferes with the uptake and presentation of tumour-associated antigens (TAA) to specific anti-tumour cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) and T helper cells (Th). These impaired immune effector functions may contribute to the early metastatic events that are associated with this tumour type. Since complete surgical excision at an early stage remains the only curative treatment option (adjuvant therapy options are limited and show no survival benefits), immunopotentiation of the SLN to jump-start or boost tumour specific immunity in early stage melanoma may be a valuable adjuvant treatment option that can be generally applied with minimal discomfort to the patient. Early clinical studies indicate that local Granulocyte/Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) or Cytosine-phosphate-Guanine (CpG) administration leads to activation of different DC subsets and conditions the SLN microenvironment to be more conducive to the generation of T-cell-mediated anti-tumour immunity.

Prospective Multi-Institutional Study of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Molecular Staging of Melanoma

Purpose

To evaluate the prognostic significance of molecular staging using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in detecting occult melanoma cells in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and circulating bloodstream.

Patients and Methods

In this multicenter study, eligibility criteria included patient age 18 to 71 years, invasive melanoma ≥ 1.0 mm Breslow thickness, and no clinical evidence of metastasis. SLN biopsy and wide excision of the primary tumor were performed. SLNs were examined by serial-section histopathology and S-100 immunohistochemistry. A portion of each SLN was frozen for RT-PCR. In addition, RT-PCR was performed on peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). RT-PCR analysis was performed using four markers: tyrosinase, MART1, MAGE3, and GP-100. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant–DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1,446 patients with histologically negative SLNs underwent RT-PCR analysis. At a median follow-up of 30 months, there was no difference in DFS, DDFS, or OS between the RT-PCR–positive (n = 620) and RT-PCR–negative (n = 826) patients. Analysis of PBMC from 820 patients revealed significant differences in DFS and DDFS, but not OS, for patients with detection of more than one RT-PCR marker in peripheral blood.

Conclusion

In this large, prospective, multi-institutional study, RT-PCR analysis on SLNs and PBMCs provides no additional prognostic information beyond standard histopathologic analysis of SLNs. Detection of more than one marker in PBMC is associated with a worse prognosis. RT-PCR remains investigational and should not be used to direct adjuvant therapy at this time.

Sentinel node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma

Status of the regional lymph nodes is a strong prognostic factor in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) and can be assessed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). We present our technique of preoperative lymphatic mapping and intraoperative vital dye and handheld gamma probe. Our results and three years follow-up of its routine use in 198 patients with verified primary CMM are presented. Median follow-up time was 24 months (range 1-47). Metastatic regional lymph node disease was found by SLNB in 61 patients (31%) and additional metastatic nodes were found by formal node dissection in 30% of these cases. Complications were relatively mild but included one case of lymphoedema in a node negative patient. By follow-up, 13% had developed a recurrence including 26% of node positive patients and 8% of node negative patients. Mortality was also substantially higher in node positive cases with 18% dying in the follow-up period and 3% in the node negative group. The SLNB procedure was associated with a false negative rate of 8%. Using the presented technique, we found that SLNB was a useful procedure for staging patients with CMM and for selecting patients for more extensive metastatic screening and inclusion in trials of adjuvant treatments.

Reasons for failure to identify positive sentinel nodes in breast cancer patients with significant nodal involvement

AIM

To analyse causes of failure of sentinel node (SN) procedures in breast cancer patients and assess the role of pre-operative ultrasound examination of the axilla.

METHODS

In 138 consecutive clinically node negative breast cancer patients with the primary tumour in situ a SN procedure with radiolabeled colloid and blue dye was performed. Radioactivity in the SN was scored as inadequate or adequate. The axillary lymph node dissection scored for number of involved nodes and presence of extranodal growth.

RESULTS

In 53/138 patients, the SN was positive for tumour. Full axillary node dissection revealed that 58/138 were node positive. So in five patients the SN failed to predict true nodal status. In 3/5, the radioactive ratio (SN vs background) was inadequate. All were found to have extensive nodal involvement. The radioactivity ratio was inadequate in 37/138 patients. This ratio was inadequate in 10 of 15 patients with > or =4 positive nodes and 27 of 123 in patients with 0-3 positive nodes (p < 0.001). If extranodal growth was present the radioactive ratio was inadequate in 13 of 18 patients, whilst this was only the case in 24 of 120 patients without extranodal growth or metastases (p < 0.001). Ultrasound (US) examination and US-guided FNAC was able to pre-operatively identify 16 of the 26 patients with four or more metastases in the axilla.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive nodal involvement is an important cause of failure of the sentinel node biopsy. Pre-operative ultrasound examination of the axilla can avoid this in almost two thirds of these patients.

Novel Imaging Techniques in Melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most deadly malignancies. Although it accounts for approximately 4% of all cancer cases, it ac-counts for approximately 79% of skin cancer-related deaths. In the past few years, the nuclear medicine platform used in the management of melanoma has extended to biochemical and structural imaging. In clinical practice, integrated positron emission tomography/CT devices allow anatomic and metabolic characterization of meta-static disease in a single study. Similarly, more accurate localization of sentinel nodes in a 3-D space now is feasible with hybrid single photon emission CT/CT system. In translational research, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose probes have been designed to optimize the detection of melanoma tumor sites in vivo.

Sentinel node dissection in vulvar cancer

Vulvar cancer is an uncommon but devastating disease. In addition to radical vulvectomy, most patients require inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, which often results in wound infection, wound breakdown, and chronic lymphedema. In the past, the gold standard for early lesions was radical vulvectomy with complete bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy. This resulted in a low rate of recurrence but devastating disfigurement and high complication rates. Because only approximately 20% of patients with vulvar cancer have positive lymph nodes upon presentation, the traditional approach of inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy for all patients resulted in many patients undergoing a morbid procedure without any real benefit. Sentinel node dissection, by removing only the nodes with the highest risk of containing metastases, offers a much less morbid alternative. In addition, because only one or two lymph nodes are removed, these can be subjected to a more thorough histopathologic analysis than conventional complete lymphadenectomy. This involves serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin antigen. Very small metastases, termed micrometastases, can be detected in this fashion. Therefore, sentinel node dissection with serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining potentially offers a more accurate assessment of the regional nodes with less morbidity. Patients with positive sentinel nodes may then undergo additional therapy. Patients with negative sentinel nodes are theoretically at very low risk for metastases and should not require any additional treatment.

Surgical Management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: Excision Margins and the Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Examination

Surgical strategies for managing patients who have primary cutaneous melanoma have changed dramatically over the past 30 years. More conservative excision margins have been shown to be adequate, and routine complete lymph node dissection (CLND)has been abandoned since the sentinel node (SN) biopsy technique was introduced. Knowledge of a patient's SN status not only provides a reliable guide to prognosis, but also allows CLND to be avoided in 80% to 85% of patients. Recent clinical trial results suggest that SN biopsy, with immediate CLND if an SN is positive,confers a survival advantage in those who have metastatic disease in regional nodes. Minimally invasive and noninvasive methods of SN assessment, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy, are being evaluated.

Single-Institution Experience in the Management of Patients with Clinical Stage I and II Cutaneous Melanoma: Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in 240 Cases

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been developed as a minimally invasive technique to determine the pathologic status of regional lymph nodes in patients without clinically palpable disease and incorporated in the latest version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of SLNB and the prognostic value of the micrometastases and the pattern of early recurrences in patients according to sentinel lymph node (SLN) status.

METHOD

Patients with cutaneous melanoma in stages I and II (AJCC 2002) who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLNB from 1997 to 2003 were included in a prospective database for analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of identification of the SLN was 100%. Micrometastases to SLN were found in 20.8% of patients. The rate of SLN micrometastases increased according to Breslow thickness and clinical stage. Breslow thickness of 0.99 mm was the optimal cutpoint for predicting the SLNB result. Twenty-four patients (12.3%) developed a locoregional or distant recurrence at a median follow-up of 31 months. Recurrences were more frequent in patients with a positive SLN. Among patients who had a recurrence, those with a positive SLN were more likely to have distant metastases than those with negative SLN. Nodal recurrences were more frequent in patients with a negative SLN compared with those with a positive SLN.

CONCLUSIONS

The status of the SLN provides accurate staging for identifying patients who may benefit from further therapy and is the most important prognostic factor of relapse-free survival.

High positive sentinel node identification rate by EORTC melanoma group protocol. Prognostic indicators of metastatic patterns after sentinel node biopsy in melanoma

Methods to work-up sentinel nodes (SN) vary considerably between institutes. This single institution study evaluated the positive SN-identification rate of the EORTC Melanoma Group (MG) protocol and investigated the prognostic value of the SN status regarding disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and evaluated the locoregional control after the SN procedure. Multivariate and univariate analyses using Cox's proportional hazard regression model was employed to assess the prognostic value of covariates regarding DFS and OS. The positive SN-identification rate was 29% at a median Breslow thickness of 2.00 mm and the false-negative rate was 9.4%. Breslow thickness and ulceration of the primary correlated with SN status. SN status, ulceration and site of the primary tumour correlated with DFS. SN status and ulceration of the primary correlated with OS. The in-transit metastasis rate correlated with SN-positivity, Breslow thickness and ulceration. Projected 3-year OS was 95% in SN-negative and 74% in SN-positive patients. Transhilar bivalving of the SN with step sections from the central planes is simple and had a high SN-positive detection rate of about 30%. The SN status is the most important predictive value for DFS and OS. In-transit metastasis rates correlated with SN-positivity, Breslow thickness and ulceration of the primary.

Sentinel node detection and radioguided occult lesion localization in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy might replace complete axillary dissection for staging of the axilla in clinically N0 breast cancer patients and represent a significant advantage as a minimally invasive procedure, considering that about 70% of patients are found to be free from metastatic disease, yet axillary node dissection can lead to significant morbidity. In our Institute, Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization is the standard method to locate non-palpable breast lesions and the gamma probes is very effective in assisting intra-operative localization and removal, as in sentinel node biopsy. The rapid spread of sentinel lymph node biopsy has led to its use in clinical settings previously considered contraindications to sentinel lymph node biopsy. In this contest, we evaluated in a large group of patients possible factors affecting sentinel node detection and the reliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy carried out after large excisional breast biopsy. Our data confirm that a previous breast surgery does not prohibit efficient sentinel lymph node localization and sentinel lymph node biopsy can correctly stage the axialla in these patients.

Clinical significance of occult metastatic melanoma in sentinel lymph nodes and other high-risk factors based on long-term follow-up

Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy (SSL) following preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is the most significant recent advance in the management of patients with primary melanoma. This study evaluates the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status and other risk factors in predicting survival and recurrence in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. From October 1993 to July 1998 a series of 412 patients with primary invasive melanoma underwent SSL at the UCSF/ Mt. Zion Melanoma Center. The outcome of 363 evaluable patients is summarized in this study. The factors related to survival and disease recurrence were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard regression models. The overall incidence of patients with positive SLNs was 18%. Over a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the overall mortality rate in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma was 18.7%, and 74 recurrences occurred (20.4%). Mortality was significantly related to SLN status [HR = 2.06; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 1.18, 3.58], angiolymphatic invasion (HR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.08, 4.55), ulceration (HR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.02, 3.15), mitotic index (HR =1.38; 95% CI 1.01, 1.90), and tumor thickness (HR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.21, 3.99). Factors significantly related to disease-free survival included SLN status (HR = 2.09; 95% CI 1.31, 3.34), tumor thickness (HR = 1.89; 95%. CI 1.20,2.98), and age (HR= 1.26 95% CI 1.08, 1.47). SLN status was the most significant factor for melanoma recurrence and death. Other important predictors include tumor thickness, ulceration, lymphatic invasion, and mitotic index.

The feasibility and reliability of sentinel node mapping in colorectal cancer

AIMS

Sentinel node mapping (SNM) has been introduced in colorectal cancer (CRC) to improve staging by facilitating occult tumour cell (OTC) assessment in lymph nodes that are most likely to be tumour-positive. In this paper, studies on the feasibility and reliability of SNM in CRC are reviewed.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the National Library of Medicine by using the keywords colonic, rectal, colorectal, neoplasm, adenocarcinoma, cancer and sentinel. Additional articles were identified by cross-referencing from papers retrieved in the initial search.

RESULTS

There is a large variation in identification rates and false-negative rates mainly due to the learning curve effect, differences in SNM technique and tumour stage.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that SNM in CRC is technically feasible. Standardization of SNM procedures is mandatory to resolve the debate on the reliability of sentinel node status for predicting the tumour status of all lymph nodes. Only then can adjuvant treatment of patients upstaged by OTC detection in sentinel nodes be justified.