Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in the surgical management of breast cancer: experience in 156 cases

Increased body mass index and ASA physical status IV are risk factors for block failure in ambulatory surgery — an analysis of 9,342 blocks

PURPOSE

Regional anesthesia can be the technique of choice for selected ambulatory surgery procedures, but in spite of its benefits, it has an inherent failure rate even in experienced hands. We examine the efficacy and factors associated with failure of ambulatory regional anesthesia techniques.

METHODS

This study included 9,342 blocks performed on 7,160 patients at the Duke University Ambulatory Surgery Center. Blocks were classified as interscalene, supraclavicular, axillary, lumbar plexus, femoral, sciatic, ankle, paravertebral, spinal, and other (frequency less than 100). A block was considered surgical if a single attempt at placing the block resulted in a complete sensory, motor, and sympathetic nerve block. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the risk-adjusted association between patient characteristics and block failure.

RESULTS

Paravertebral blocks and those considered in the "other" category had significantly higher failure rates (P < 0.001), while spinal and lumbar plexus blocks had lower than average rates of failure (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). In multiple logistic regression analyses excluding paravertebral blocks, body mass index (BMI) scores greater than 25 (P values: BMI 25-29: < 0.001; BMI 30-34: P < 0.001; BMI 35: P < 0.001) and ASA physical status IV (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher block failure rates.

CONCLUSION

High BMI and ASA IV are independent risk factors for block failure in ambulatory surgery patients.

Evaluation of a local anaesthesia regimen following mastectomy

Breast surgery can be emotionally distressing and physically painful. Acute pain following surgery is often related mainly to the axillary surgery and is aggravated by arm and shoulder movement. We conducted a prospective double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to determine the influence of local anaesthetic irrigation of axillary wound drains on postoperative pain during the first 24 h following a modified Patey mastectomy (mastectomy with complete axillary node clearance). The treatment group received bupivacaine irrigation through the axillary wound drain 4-hourly for 24 h postoperatively. Controls received irrigation with normal saline. Morphine via a patient controlled analgesia pump was used for postoperative analgesia. Morphine consumption, visual analogue and verbal rating pain scores were recorded. There were no statistical differences in morphine requirements or pain scores between the two groups, nor were there differences in anti-emetic or supplemental analgesic consumption. Bupivacaine irrigation used in this manner does not appear to offer an effective contribution to postoperative analgesia.

Use of Continuous Paravertebral Analgesia to Facilitate Neurologic Assessment and Enhance Recovery After Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Neurologic assessment after thoracic aortic aneurysm repair is important for detecting and treating late onset paraplegia. Traditional methods of pain control, such as patient-controlled IV analgesia and epidural analgesia, may interfere with neurologic assessment. We present a case of a patient who received continuous thoracic paravertebral analgesia that provided excellent analgesia while preserving the ability to monitor neurologic function.

IMPLICATIONS

We provided postoperative continuous paravertebral analgesia in a patient after thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair requiring postoperative neurologic assessment. Paravertebral analgesia provides unilateral analgesia with fewer neurologic and hemodynamic side effects than central neuraxial blockade and should be considered for management of patients undergoing thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.

Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery

Surgical injury can be followed by pain, nausea, vomiting and ileus, stress-induced catabolism, impaired pulmonary function, increased cardiac demands, and risk of thromboembolism. These problems can lead to complications, need for treatment in hospital, postoperative fatigue, and delayed convalescence. Development of safe and short-acting anaesthetics, improved pain relief by early intervention with multimodal analgesia, and stress reduction by regional anaesthetic techniques, beta-blockade, or glucocorticoids have provided important possibilities for enhanced recovery. When these techniques are combined with a change in perioperative care a pronounced enhancement of recovery and decrease in hospital stay can be achieved, even in major operations. The anaesthetist has an important role in facilitating early postoperative recovery by provision of minimally-invasive anaesthesia and pain relief, and by collaborating with surgeons, surgical nurses, and physiotherapists to reduce risk and pain.

Optimising postoperative pain management in the ambulatory patient

Over 60% of surgery is now performed in an ambulatory setting. Despite improved analgesics and sophisticated drug delivery systems, surveys indicate that over 80% of patients experience moderate to severe pain postoperatively. Inadequate postoperative pain relief can prolong recovery, precipitate or increase the duration of hospital stay, increase healthcare costs, and reduce patient satisfaction. Effective postoperative pain management involves a multimodal approach and the use of various drugs with different mechanisms of action. Local anaesthetics are widely administered in the ambulatory setting using techniques such as local injection, field block, regional nerve block or neuraxial block. Continuous wound infusion pumps may have great potential in an ambulatory setting. Regional anaesthesia (involving anaesthetising regional areas of the body, including single extremities, multiple extremities, the torso, and the face or jaw) allows surgery to be performed in a specific location, usually an extremity, without the use of general anaesthesia, and potentially with little or no sedation. Opioids remain an important component of any analgesic regimen in treating moderate to severe acute postoperative pain. However, the incorporation of non-opioids, local anaesthetics and regional techniques will enhance current postoperative analgesic regimens. The development of new modalities of treatment, such as patient controlled analgesia, and newer drugs, such as cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, provide additional choices for the practitioner. While there are different routes of administration for analgesics (e.g. oral, parenteral, intramuscular, transmucosal, transdermal and sublingual), oral delivery of medications has remained the mainstay for postoperative pain control. The oral route is effective, the simplest to use and typically the least expensive. The intravenous route has the advantages of a rapid onset of action and easier titratibility, and so is recommended for the treatment of acute pain.Non-pharmacological methods for the management of postoperative pain include acupuncture, electromagnetic millimetre waves, hypnosis and the use of music during surgery. However, further research of these techniques is warranted to elucidate their effectiveness in this indication. Pain is a multifactorial experience, not just a sensation. Emotion, perception and past experience all affect an individual's response to noxious stimuli. Improved postoperative pain control through innovation and creativity may improve compliance, ease of delivery, reduce length of hospital stay and improve patient satisfaction. Patient education, early diagnosis of symptoms and aggressive treatment of pain using an integrative approach, combining pharmacotherapy as well as complementary technique, should serve us well in dealing with this complex problem.

Acute pain management of patients with multiple fractured ribs

BACKGROUND

Multiple rib fracture causes severe pain that can seriously compromise respiratory mechanics and exacerbate underlying lung injury and pre-existing respiratory disease, predisposing to respiratory failure. The cornerstone of management is early institution of effective pain relief, the subject of this review.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted for the years 1966 through and up to December 2002 for human studies written in English using the keywords "rib fractures", "analgesia", "blunt chest trauma", "thoracic injury", and "nerve block". The reference list of key articles was also searched for relevant articles. The various analgesic techniques used in patients with multiple fractured ribs were summarized.

RESULTS

Analgesia could be provided using systemic opioids, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Alternatively, regional analgesic techniques such as intercostal nerve block, epidural analgesia, intrathecal opioids, interpleural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral block have been used effectively. Although invasive, in general, regional blocks tend to be more effective than systemic opioids, and produce less systemic side effects.

CONCLUSION

Based on current evidence it is difficult to recommend a single method that can be safely and effectively used for analgesia in all circumstances in patients with multiple fractured ribs. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each analgesic technique, the clinician can weigh the risks and benefits and individualize pain management based on the clinical setting and the extent of trauma.

Paravertebral Block: An Alternative to General Anesthesia in Breast Cancer Surgery

Alternative forms of anesthesia in breast cancer patients have been sought to reduce the untoward effects of general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to compare paravertebral block (PVB) and general anesthesia (GA) in terms of pain control, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and resumption of diet in patients undergoing operations for breast cancer. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients (289) undergoing breast cancer surgery from May 1, 1999 through December 31, 2000 with PVB or GA. The PVB (n = 128) and GA (n = 100) groups had similar demographics. Postoperative narcotics were given to 80.8 and 93 per cent of PVB and GA patients, respectively ( P < 0.01), after an average of 216 and 122 minutes from the end of surgery ( P = 0.028). The PVB group received 6.2 narcotic units compared with 10.1 in the GA group ( P = 0.04). Postoperative nausea and vomiting was present in 16.8 and 24 per cent of patients in the PVB and GA groups, respectively ( P = 0.12). A diet was tolerated on the same day of surgery by 98.4 and 82 per cent of PVB and GA patients, respectively ( P < 0.01). The complication rate of PVB was 1.8 per cent. PVB resulted in better postoperative pain control and earlier resumption of diet compared with GA. The good success rate and low complication rate of PVB make it well suited for breast cancer surgery and can eliminate the need for GA in patients with serious comorbidities.

Continuous thoracic paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine for pain management in patients with multiple fractured ribs

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a continuous thoracic paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine for pain management in patients with unilateral multiple fractured ribs (MFR).

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized case series.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary tertiary hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifteen patients with unilateral MFR.

INTERVENTIONS

Insertion of a catheter into the thoracic paravertebral space. We administered an initial injection of 0.3 mL/kg (1.5 mg/kg) bupivacaine 0.5% with 1:200,000 epinephrine followed 30 min later by an infusion of bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.1 to 0.2 mL/kg/h for 4 days.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The following parameters were measured during the initial assessment before thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), 30 min after the initial injection, and during follow-up on day 1 and day 4 after commencing the infusion of bupivacaine: visual analog pain score at rest and during coughing; respiratory rate; arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)); bedside spirometry (ie, FVC, FEV(1), FEV(1)/FVC ratio, and peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR]); arterial blood gas measurements; and O(2) index (ie, PaO(2)/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio). There were significant improvements in pain scores (at rest, p = 0.002; during coughing, p = 0.001), respiratory rate (p < 0.0001), FVC (p = 0.007), PEFR (p = 0.01), SaO(2) (p = 0.04), and O(2) index (p = 0.01) 30 min after the initial injection, which were sustained for the 4 days that the thoracic paravertebral infusion was in use (p < 0.05). PaCO(2) did not change significantly after the initial injection, but on day 4 it was significantly lower than the post-TPVB value (p = 0.04). One patient had an inadvertent epidural injection, and another developed transient ipsilateral Horner syndrome with sensory changes in the arm. No patient exhibited clinical signs of inadvertent intravascular injection or local anesthetic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirmed that continuous thoracic paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine is a simple and effective method of providing continuous pain relief in patients with unilateral MFR. It also produced a sustained improvement in respiratory parameters and oxygenation.

Ambulatory mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory mastectomy has been a topic of heated political debate with little analysis of clinical data.

METHODS

Based on extensive satisfaction surveys, an ideal surgical treatment experience was developed that decreased nausea, increased preoperative education, and reduced perioperative narcotic usage. Using this new algorithm, patients treated by a single surgeon were given the choice of overnight stay versus discharge to home with visiting nurse care.

RESULTS

From March 1 to October 31, 2001, 92 mastectomies or lumpectomy/axillary dissections were performed in 87 patients. One patient chose to remain in the center overnight. All others were discharged in less than 2.5 hours postoperatively. Perioperative complications fell to 20% of those of the prior year. Hospital charges fell 79.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite lay reservations about ambulatory mastectomy, a detailed approach can result in markedly reduced health care costs without incurring additional morbidity or mortality.

Bilateral continuous paravertebral catheters for reduction mammoplasty

Surgical procedures of the breast can result in significant postoperative pain. Paravertebral nerve blocks have been used successfully in the management of analgesia after breast surgery but are limited by a single injection. This report describes the use of bilateral paravertebral catheters to provide extended analgesia for reduction mammoplasty. A 48-year-old female underwent bilateral paravertebral catheter placement at thoracic level 3 and local anesthetic injections followed by general anesthesia for elective reduction mammoplasty. She reported no pain following the operation and required no supplemental opioids for pain management during her overnight recovery. This case demonstrates a method for extended bilateral thoracic analgesia. The technique may offer an alternative to traditional outpatient analgesics for reduction mammoplasty.

Paravertebral somatic nerve blocks for breast surgery in a patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE

Patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), a genetic disorder resulting in idiopathic myocardial thickening, can present the anesthesiologist with significant management difficulties. This report reviews the physiology of this important disease process and describes the use of paravertebral nerve blocks (PVB) in the management of a patient with HOCM who presented for partial mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 72-yr-old female presented for breast cancer surgery with a significant past medical history of HOCM diagnosed during hospitalization for non-small cell lung cancer. PVB were performed at thoracic levels 1-6 and 5 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and epinephrine 1:400,000 was injected at each level. Intraoperatively the patient required no other medication for analgesia and was comfortable and conversant during the two-hour procedure. She remained pain free following the operation and did not require any opioid medication until the following day.

CONCLUSIONS

PVB provide excellent analgesia and are a useful alternative anesthetic when faced with the HOCM patient requiring major breast surgery.

Paravertebral anaesthesia/analgesia for ambulatory surgery

For many years, paravertebral nerve blockade has been an established technique for providing analgesia to the chest and abdomen. The current emphasis on containment of health care costs has resulted in a rediscovery of anaesthetic techniques, such as paravertebral blocks, that facilitate outpatient surgical management and promote early discharge. Paravertebral nerve blocks (PVB) produce excellent surgical conditions for many procedures of the chest and abdomen while providing profound long-lasting analgesia with few undesirable side-effects that aids in the compassionate early discharge of the patient from the ambulatory setting. This chapter reviews the pertinent anatomy and techniques involved in the successful placement of PVB. Continuous paravertebral catheters, pharmacological agents used in PVB, and single versus multiple injection paravertebral block techniques are also covered. Specific clinical situations that are particularly well suited to the application of PVB as the primary anaesthetic in the ambulatory setting and other clinical situations where analgesia from PVB is efficacious are discussed.

Outcome after regional anaesthesia in the ambulatory setting--is it really worth it?

Regional anaesthesia provides a continuum of perioperative care that includes perioperative pain management, decreased opioid requirements and decreased post-operative nausea and vomiting. In addition to these benefits, a wide variety of perioperative outcomes can be enhanced by utilizing regional anaesthesia in the ambulatory setting. Regional anaesthesia has been shown to improve the cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, coagulative, immunological and cognitive functions and to be of benefit in an economic context. These improvements are particularly advantageous in caring for elderly and high-risk patient populations undergoing surgery. In addition, regional anaesthesia can facilitate early recovery with excellent post-operative analgesia and few side-effects, which may decrease overall operative costs. This chapter identifies important perioperative outcomes that may be positively influenced by the use of regional anaesthesia in the ambulatory setting.

Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of modifying perioperative care in noncardiac surgical patients on morbidity, mortality, and other outcome measures.

BACKGROUND

New approaches in pain control, introduction of techniques that reduce the perioperative stress response, and the more frequent use of minimal invasive surgical access have been introduced over the past decade. The impact of these interventions, either alone or in combination, on perioperative outcome was evaluated.

METHODS

We searched Medline for the period of 1980 to the present using the key terms fast track surgery, accelerated care programs, postoperative complications and preoperative patient preparation; and we examined and discussed the articles that were identified to include in this review. This information was supplemented with our own research on the mediators of the stress response in surgical patients, the use of epidural anesthesia in elective operations, and pilot studies of fast track surgical procedures using the multimodality approach.

RESULTS

The introduction of newer approaches to perioperative care has reduced both morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. In the future, most elective operations will become day surgical procedures or require only 1 to 2 days of postoperative hospitalization. Reorganization of the perioperative team (anesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses, and physical therapists) will be essential to achieve successful fast track surgical programs.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding perioperative pathophysiology and implementation of care regimes to reduce the stress of an operation, will continue to accelerate rehabilitation associated with decreased hospitalization and increased satisfaction and safety after discharge. Developments and improvements of multimodal interventions within the context of "fast track" surgery programs represents the major challenge for the medical professionals working to achieve a "pain and risk free" perioperative course.

Paravertebral blockade for minor breast surgery

Paravertebral blockade (PVB) has been advocated as a useful technique for breast surgery. We prospectively compared the efficacy of PVB via a catheter technique with the efficacy of general anesthesia (GA) for minor breast surgery. Thirty patients were randomized into two groups to receive either PVB or GA. Variables of efficacy were postoperative pain measured on a visual analog scale, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recovery time, and patient satisfaction. Postoperative visual analog scale scores in the PVB group were significantly lower in the early postoperative period (maximum, 12 vs 45 mm; P < 0.01). In both groups, PONV was nearly absent. There was no difference in recovery time. Patient satisfaction was better in the PVB group (2.8 vs 2.3; scale, 0-3; P < 0.01). There was one inadvertent epidural block and one inadvertent pleural puncture in the PVB group. Although PVB resulted in better postoperative pain relief, the advantages over GA were marginal in this patient group because postoperative pain was relatively mild and the incidence of PONV was small. Considering that the technique has a certain complication rate, we conclude that at present the risk/benefit ratio of PVB does not favor routine use for minor breast surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

This study confirms the previously reported superior pain relief after paravertebral blockade (PVB) for breast surgery. However, considering the relatively mild postoperative pain and therefore the limited advantage of PVB for these patients, the risk/benefit ratio does not favor the routine use of PVB for minor breast surgery.

Causes for the undertreatment of elderly breast cancer patients: tailoring treatments to individual patients

BACKGROUND

Ageism has been suggested as a cause for the undertreatment of elderly breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate and causes of elderly patients not receiving standard therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

A random sample of 500 patients was reviewed for age, cancer stage, surgical, radiation, cytotoxic or hormonal chemotherapy, number and type of comorbidities, type of therapeutic deficiencies, and their causes.

RESULTS

The average age was 59.9+/-13.6 years. Of the patients less than 65 years old, 6.0% did not receive standard treatment, compared with 22.2% of patients 65 years or older. Treatment omitted in the less than 65-year-old group: 16.7%, no tumor extirpation; 38.9%, no axillary dissection; 33.3%, no radiation therapy; and 33.3% no chemotherapy. Treatment omitted in the 65-year and older group: 11.4%, no tumor extirpation; 39.1%, no axillary dissection; 47.7%, no radiation therapy; and 18.2%, no chemotherapy. Causes in the less than 65-year-old group were: prohibitive associated medical conditions, 27.8%; favorable primary tumor pathology, 16.7%; and patient treatment refusal, 55.6%. Causes in the 65-year and older group were: prohibitive associated medical conditions, 40.9%; favorable tumor pathology, 13.6%; patient treatment refusal, 31.8%; and unexplainable, 13.6%. The median number of concomitant medical conditions in patients receiving standard therapy was one compared with three in the undertreated patients from prohibitive associated medical conditions or unexplained causes.

CONCLUSION

Population-based studies of breast cancer treatment do not adequately assess the complex decision making associated with breast cancer in the elderly. Patients do not receive standard care for specific reasons.

The preoperative assessment of the cancer patient

The cancer patient presents special challenges to the anesthesiologist. Cancer may have multiple effects including those due to the primary tumor, metastases, the effects and toxicity of cancer therapy, associated paraneoplastic and physiologic responses to the tumor and the strong psychological responses elicited by cancer. The preoperative evaluation of the cancer patient provides opportunities to understand the patient's medical condition and to plan management. Specific goals of the preoperative assessment include a relevant and complete patient history with emphasis on the cancer, thorough examination of the patient, appropriate diagnostic testing and formation of an anesthetic and perioperative plan. Patient education and reassurance regarding issues of safety, pain control and respect for patient preferences are important goals as well. This review provides the anesthesiologist with both general and specific information important to the systematic and complete preoperative evaluation of the patient with cancer.

Multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain control

Pain is one of the main postoperative adverse outcomes. Single analgesics, either opioid or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), are not able to provide effective pain relief without side effects such as nausea, vomiting, sedation, or bleeding. A majority of double or single-blind studies investigating the use of NSAIDs and opioid analgesics with or without local anesthetic infiltration showed that patients experience lower pain scores, need fewer analgesics, and have a prolonged time to requiring analgesics after surgery. This review focuses on multimodal analgesia, which is currently recommended for effective postoperative pain control.

Regional anesthesia for ambulatory surgery

Ambulatory surgery is increasing at unprecedented rates with more complex procedures being performed. This article reviews the benefits of the use of regional anesthesia during ambulatory surgeries. Regional anesthesia, by putting the anesthetic at the surgical site, provides ideal conditions for ambulatory surgery and provides a smooth, predictable post-operative course.

Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery

Cosmetic and reconstructive breast augmentation is a frequently performed surgical procedure. Despite advances in medical treatment, surgical intervention is often associated with postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting. Paravertebral nerve block (PVB) has the potential to offer long-lasting pain relief and fewer postoperative side effects when used for breast surgery. We compared thoracic PVB with general anesthesia for cosmetic breast surgery in a single-blinded, prospective, randomized study of 60 women scheduled for unilateral or bilateral breast augmentation or reconstruction. Patients were assigned (n = 30 per group) to receive a standardized general anesthetic (GA) or thoracic PVB (levels T1-7). Procedural data were collected, as well as verbal and visual analog pain and nausea scores. Verbal postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the PVB group at 30 min (P = 0.0005), 1 h (P = 0.0001), and 24 h (P = 0.04) when compared with GA. Nausea was less severe in the PVB group at 24 h (P = 0.04), but not at 30 min or 1 h. We conclude that PVB is an alternative technique for cosmetic breast surgery that may offer superior pain relief and decreased nausea to GA alone.

IMPLICATIONS

Paravertebral nerve block has the potential to offer long-lasting pain relief and few postoperative side effects when used for breast surgery. We demonstrated that paravertebral nerve block, when compared with general anesthesia, is an alternative technique for breast surgery that may offer pain relief superior to general anesthesia alone.

Acute pain control and accelerated postoperative surgical recovery

Postoperative pain relief continues to demand our awareness, and surgeons should be fully aware of the potential physiologic benefits of effective dynamic pain relief regimens and the great potential to improve postoperative outcome if such analgesia is used for rehabilitation. To achieve advantageous effects, accelerated multimodal postoperative recovery programs should be developed as a multidisciplinary effort, with integration of postoperative pain management into a postoperative rehabilitation program. This requires revision of traditional care programs, which should be adjusted according to recent knowledge within surgical pathophysiology. Such efforts must be expected to lead to improved quality of care for patients, with less pain and reduced morbidity leading to cost efficiency.

Local and regional block in postoperative pain control

Local and regional block provides an effective means for the control of postoperative pain. In surgery involving the trunk, it serves as a useful alternative to epidural analgesia. With the increasing use of low molecular weight heparin, the use of peripheral nerve block is increasingly popular for patients undergoing lower limb surgery.