Risk Factors Affecting Outcome of Metal-on-Metal Surface Arthroplasty of the Hip:

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is a type of hip replacement that involves capping the femoral head and preserving bone of the proximal femur. Metal-on-metal surface replacements have been manufactured since the early 1990s. Recent studies indicate excellent clinical results with low failure rates at 1- to 5-year follow-up. Although these early results are encouraging, resurfacing devices must be used with caution because less is known about their long-term safety and efficacy. The best candidates for resurfacing are patients younger than age 60 years with good bone stock. The surgical approach is similar to that for standard total hip replacements, but with slightly more dissection because the femoral head must be preserved and displaced to visualize the acetabulum. To reduce complications, resurfacing arthroplasty should be performed by surgeons who have received training specifically in this technique.

A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement

We have undertaken a prospective, randomised study to compare conservation of acetabular bone after total hip replacement and resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. We randomly assigned 210 hips to one of the two treatment groups. Uncemented, press-fit acetabular components were used for both.

No significant difference was found in the mean diameter of acetabular implant inserted in the groups (54.74 mm for total hip replacement and 54.90 mm for resurfacing arthroplasty). In seven resurfacing procedures (6.8%), the surgeon used a larger size of component in order to match the corresponding diameter of the femoral component.

With resurfacing arthroplasty, conservation of bone is clearly advantageous on the femoral side. Our study has shown that, with a specific design of acetabular implant and by following a careful surgical technique, removal of bone on the acetabular side is comparable with that of total hip replacement.

Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty

We have compared the biomechanical nature of the reconstruction of the hip in conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) and surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) in a randomised study involving 120 patients undergoing unilateral primary hip replacement. The contralateral hip was used as a control. Post-operatively, the femoral offset was significantly increased with THA (mean 5.1 mm; -2.8 to 11.6) and decreased with SRA (mean -3.3 mm; -8.9 to 8.2). Femoral offset was restored within sd 4 mm in 14 (25%) of those with THA and in 28 (57%) of the patients receiving SRA (p < 0.001). In the THA group, the leg was lengthened by a mean of 2.6 mm (-6.04 to +12.9), whereas it was shortened by a mean of 1.9 mm (-7.1 to +2.05) in the SRA group, compared with the contralateral side. Leg-length inequality was restored within sd 4 mm in 42 (86%) of the SRA and 33 (60%) of the THA patients. The radiological parameters of acetabular reconstruction were similar in both groups. Restoration of the normal proximal femoral anatomy was more precise with SRA. The enhanced stability afforded by the use of a large-diameter femoral head avoided over-lengthening of the limb or increased offset to improve soft-tissue tension as occurs sometimes in THA. In a subgroup of patients with significant pre-operative deformity, restoration of the normal hip anatomy with lower pre-operative femoral offset or significant shortening of the leg was still possible with SRA.

The clinical significance of metal ion release from cobalt-chromium metal-on-metal hip joint arthroplasty

Metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings offer extremely low wear and the avoidance of polyethylene but generate metallic wear particles. Although their total volume is dramatically smaller than polyethylene debris, these particles are in the nanometre size range and are many times more numerous. Metallic particles are ingested by macrophages or may be disseminated via lymphatics to the reticuloendothelial system. They corrode, and metal ions are present in the circulation and concentrated in erythrocytes. Excretion of metal ions via the kidneys seems to balance their generation in patients with MOM implants. However, highly sensitive detection methods can be used to show that levels of circulating cobalt and chromium ions are several times the normal level. These concentrations are well within the limits identified as dangerous to health in workers exposed to industrial chemicals, and also considerably lower than the levels found to cause cell toxicity in vitro. The local concentrations of particles and metal ions in the synovial tissue may occasionally exceed these limits and cause tissue necrosis. Clinical experience of lysis is rare in association with MOM bearings, as are hypersensitivity reactions and MOM bearings have had an excellent record over four decades and have a favourable benefit to risk ratio. Further reduction in risk will be achieved by improvement of materials, engineering, and accuracy of insertion.

Background of metal-on-metal resurfacing

Hip resurfacing is not a new concept and attempts to treat hip arthritis without resecting the femoral head and neck have been made since the 1950s. The resurgence of new and better-engineered metal-on-metal bearings has provided the means to develop a viable prosthetic solution from a concept that was once abandoned. The lessons drawn from the early resurfacing era led to modern designs all using a cementless fixation of the acetabular component and a short metaphyseal stem designed for component alignment on the femoral side. Currently, only metallic devices can be manufactured with sufficient strength as a thin one-piece shell, combining excellent wear properties for large femoral heads and a bone-conserving device on the acetabular side. The early results of these new designs are extremely encouraging but the rapid development of the procedure needs to be controlled by appropriate training programmes to ensure its future success.

Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip

We compared the five- to seven-year clinical and radiological results of the metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing with a hybrid total hip arthroplasty in two groups of 54 hips, matched for gender, age, body mass index and activity level.

Function was excellent in both groups, as measured by the Oxford hip score, but the Birmingham hip resurfacings had higher University of California at Los Angeles activity scores and better EuroQol quality of life scores. The total hip arthroplasties had a revision or intention-to-revise rate of 8%, and the Birmingham hip resurfacings of 6%. Both groups demonstrated impending failure on surrogate end-points. Of the total hip arthroplasties, 12% had polyethylene wear and osteolysis under observation, and 8% of Birmingham hip resurfacings showed migration of the femoral component. Polyethylene wear was present in 48% of the hybrid hips without osteolysis. Of the femoral components in the Birmingham hip resurfacing group which had not migrated, 66% had radiological changes of unknown significance.

Notching of the femoral neck during resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a vascular study

During hip resurfacing arthroplasty, excessive valgus positioning or surgical technique can result in notching of the femoral neck. Although mechanical weakening and subsequent fracture of the femoral neck are well described, the potential damage to the retinacular vessels leading to an ischaemic event is relatively unknown. Using laser Doppler flowmetry, we measured the blood flow in 14 osteoarthritic femoral heads during routine total hip replacement surgery, before and after notching of the femoral neck. In ten hips there was a reduction in blood flow of more than 50% from the baseline value after simulated notching of the femoral neck. Our results suggest that femoral head vascularity in the osteoarthritic state is similar to the non-arthritic state, where damage to the extraosseous vessels can predispose to avascular necrosis. Surgeons who perform resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip should pay careful attention to these vessels by avoiding excessive dissection around the femoral neck and/or notching.

A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old

The purpose of this prospective randomised study is to compare the early clinical results of the metal-on-metal hip resurfacing to metal-on-metal THA. Two hundred and ten hips were randomised between August 2003 and January 2006 (191 subjects). One hundred and two hips were implanted with an uncemented titanium tapered stem, and an uncemented titanium acetabular component and 28 mm metal-on-metal bearing (THA group) and 103 hips received a hybrid metal-on-metal surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA group). No significant difference was found with the WOMAC or Merle dAubign-Postel scales. However, a significantly higher activity level was found in the SRA group (UCLA score 6.3 versus 7.1, p= 0.037) and a greater percentage of the SRA patients returned to heavy or moderate activities at one - year postoperatively (72% versus 39%, p=0.007). No patient in either group presented with thigh pain one year after surgery. Both techniques present similar complication rates (0.15). This study supports the theory of better functional recovery in the short-term favouring the SRA when compared to THA. The clear benefit of surface replacement arthroplasty over THA is proximal femoral bone preservation. However, the long term survivorship of the SRA will determine the real value of the theoretical advantage.

The practical limitations of resurfacing hip arthroplasty

Resurfacing hip arthroplasty has recently experienced a resurgence in popularity, associated with an unprecedented amount of coverage in the media. This article assesses what proportion of a consecutive series of young adults presenting for total hip arthroplasty would have been suitable for resurfacing arthroplasty. Retrospective review of the preoperative radiographs was performed, with templating for the resurfacing prostheses. The hips were divided into those appropriate and those inappropriate for the procedure, and those in whom the procedure would be technically challenging. Sixty-one hips in 57 patients were reviewed, with ages ranging from 17 to 49 years. Twenty-eight hips were assessed as suitable, 26 as unsuitable, and 7 as technically challenging. Reasons for unsuitability included collapse and/or cystic degeneration of the femoral head.

Long-term results with the Wagner metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis

The purpose of this study was to report the long-term results of the metal-on-metal Wagner resurfacing prosthesis. Between January 1991 and August 2004, 54 Wagner resurfacing prostheses were implanted in 52 patients. There were 45 female patients (1 bilateral case) and 7 male patients (1 bilateral case). All the operative procedures were performed using the anterior approach. Of those cases available, the average time to follow-up was nine years. The average Merle dAubign score improved from 8.3 preoperatively to 17.3 postoperatively (p-value < 0.001). Seventeen prostheses required revision. Radiographic evidence of femoral neck narrowing was seen in three prostheses that remained in situ. Combined with a stricter diagnosis and an exact operating technique, the Wagner metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip joint may offer an alternative surface replacement option.

The development of the DuromTM metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

The poor results of conventional total hip replacement in young and active patients have led to a renewed interest in alternative interventions and bearing material combinations. Con-temporary metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip has emerged as an attractive option. This procedure utilises a low wear producing bearing which minimises the risk of periprosthetic osteolysis, preserves femoral bone stock should subsequent procedures become necessary, and, due to the increased stability and range of motion, allows the rapid resumption of an active lifestyle. We describe the development of the DuromTM metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and report the preliminary results of the first 100 consecutive cases.

Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing

Short-term failures of total hip resurfacing have been related to specific characteristics of the proximal femur. A radiographic arthritic hip grading scale was used to assess four characteristics of the proximal femur: bone density, shape, biomechanics, and focal bone defects. Hips with no unfavorable characteristics were Grade A, hips with one unfavorable characteristic were Grade B, hips with two unfavorable characteristics were Grade C, hips with three unfavorable characteristics were Grade D, and hips with four unfavorable characteristics were Grade F. One hundred forty-seven consecutive hips were treated with metal-on-metal resurfacing by a single surgeon. There were no femoral neck fractures. Of the 91 hips eligible for a minimum 2 year followup, 90% were Grades A or B, 10% were Grade C, and none were Grades D or F. With a minimum 2-year followup, arthritic hip grading was associated with preoperative Harris hip score, occurrence of mild to moderate postoperative pain, preoperative and postoperative range of motion, preoperative and postoperative hip center of rotation, preoperative and postoperative horizontal femoral offset, preoperative and postoperative limb length discrepancy, and acetabular radiolucencies. Hips with a lesser degree of secondary arthritic changes have a higher arthritic hip grade and better outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Relatively strict selection criteria for resurfacing were associated with a low occurrence of short-term failures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, Level II (retrospective study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surface replacement solutions for the arthritic hip

Surface replacement is a conservative treatment for young, active patients with hip osteoarthritis. It provides an increased range of motion as the result of a larger diameter head and improved wear characteristics because of the metal-on-metal articulation as well as an extremely low dislocation rate and increased patient function. While early results are encouraging, long-term outcomes are necessary to define and delineate the role of surface replacement arthroplasty in the treatment of significant hip arthritis.

EBRA-FCA for measurement of migration of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip

Studies on the migration of an implant may be the only way of monitoring the early performance of metal-on-metal prostheses. The Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse--femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) method was adapted to measure migration of the femoral component in a metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip using standard antero-posterior radiographs. In order to determine the accuracy and precision of this method a prosthesis was implanted into cadaver bones. Eleven series of radiographs were used to perform a zero-migration study. After adjustment of the femoral component to simulate migration of 3 mm the radiographs were repeated. All were measured independently by three different observers. The accuracy of the method was found to be +/- 1.6 mm for the x-direction and +/- 2 mm for the y-direction (95% percentile). The method was validated using 28 hips with a minimum follow-up of 3.5 years after arthroplasty. Seventeen were sound, but 11 had failed because of loosening of the femoral component. The normal (control) group had a different pattern of migration compared with that of the loose group. At 29.2 months, the control group showed a mean migration of 1.62 mm and 1.05 mm compared with 4.39 mm and 4.05 mm in the failed group, for the centre of the head and the tip of the stem, respectively (p = 0.001). In the failed group, the mean time to migration greater than 2 mm was earlier than the onset of clinical symptoms or radiological evidence of failure, 19.1 versus 32.2 months (p = 0.001) and 24.8 months (p = 0.012), respectively. EBRA-FCA is a reliable and valid tool for measuring migration of the femoral component after surface arthroplasty and can be used to predict early failure of the implant. It may be of value in determining the long-term performance of surface arthroplasty.

Surface arthroplasty in young patients with hip arthritis secondary to childhood disorders

Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCP) and slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) may result in alterations of the proximal femoral morphology, leading to the development of hip osteoarthritis as a young adult. Hip surface arthroplasty presents special technical challenges in these patients because of the abnormal anatomy of the head and neck. The authors reviewed the radiographic and clinical results of patients with a history of LCP or SCFE who underwent hip resurfacing between 1996 and 2002. Despite the challenges in performing hip resurfacing in this patient population and the inability to completely normalize hip anatomy, biomechanics, and leg length discrepancy, the results to date have been encouraging.

Patient selection and surgical technique for surface arthroplasty of the hip

Factors such as patient selection, surgical technique, and durable fixation of the components are critical in surface arthroplasty of the hip. The Surface Arthroplasty Risk Index helps determine the risk of failure, with an index score </=3 having a 97% survivorship at 4 years. Because surface arthroplasty of the hip is conservative in nature and has the goal to closely reproduce the normal anatomy of the proximal femur, surgeons performing this procedure need to take into consideration the underlying pathology that led to the degenerative changes. Consequently, choice of surgical approach and positioning of the implants may have a greater impact on implant survivorship and patient function than in standard hip replacement. This article presents case illustrations of different hip pathologies treated by surface arthroplasty of the hip.

Clinical correlation of femoral component migration in hip resurfacing arthroplasty analyzed by Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-analyze-femoral component analysis

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty using metal-on-metal bearings has become increasingly popular. Wear of these bearings has been imperceptible on plain radiographs. Migration analysis studies may represent the opportunity to detect early failures and evaluate long-term prosthetic survival. The authors retrospectively reviewed 29 hips in a consecutive series of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties with a long-term clinical follow-up (average 8.7 years) to analyze the femoral component migration pattern by means of Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyze-femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA). Femoral component migrations at 2 years and latest follow-up were compared with the known clinical outcomes. The authors' findings add validity to EBRA-FCA as a means to monitor femoral component migration and the clinical outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up

The authors report preliminary results of an uncemented, hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. The survival rate of 70 implants after at least 2 years follow-up was 98.6%, with an excellent clinical outcome. There have been no femoral fractures, aseptic loosening, or radiolucencies around the stem. Thinning of the femoral neck at the inferomedial cup-neck rim has been a frequent radiologic finding but with no clinical implication so far. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the results.

Current concepts of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing

The second-generation, metal-on-metal (MOM) bearing for total hip replacements was launched in the 1980s, and resurfacing followed in the mid-1990s. Remaining challenges include long-term bone remodeling of the femoral resurfacing and consideration of adverse MOM wear conditions. Precise understanding of manufacturing variables such as alloy types, bearing diameters, design tolerances, and surface finish is imperative in obtaining clinical consistency and safety in the patient. This review examines femoral fixation, bone remodeling, and wear studies of MOM implants and provides a brief overview of the latest outcome and retrieval data and how these data integrate with the in vitro wear studies.

Oberfl�chenersatz am H�ftgelenk

Currently, an increase in resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis--especially in young adults--can be observed. New bearing technologies (mainly metal-on-metal surfaces) show better tribologic results than historical designs (e.g. the Wagner cup). At present, it is unclear whether these modifications and a definitively low dislocation rate--due to the large head diameter--can be supported by further good clinical results. The quantity as well as the quality of the available investigations prevents a definite opinion at the moment. Appropriate clinical studies with documented radiographic follow-up are necessary to compare the outcome of these new implants with standard techniques.

Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7-10 year follow-up study

Forty-two McMinn metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties were implanted in 23 males and 16 females, average age 47.5 years old. The overall survivorship at 7 years was 79%; with any reoperation surgery as endpoint, 80%; and 93%; with aseptic loosening of the socket and femoral component, respectively. The average Surface Arthroplasty Risk Index of patients who had failed or were at risk of failing on the femoral side was significantly greater than for the rest of the cohort, 3.9 versus 1.9. The overall survivorship of the McMinn component was unacceptably low, with the majority of failures occurring with the cemented acetabular components. The recent reintroduction of surface arthroplasty of the hip using metal-on-metal bearings and cementless acetabular components may benefit young patients with hip arthritis with appropriate patient selection.

Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip: hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing

Eighty-four hips with Ficat stage III and IV osteonecrosis were treated: 56 with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty (MMSA) and 28 with hemi-surface arthroplasty (HSA). Average follow-up was 4.9 years. UCLA hip scores were significantly better for MMSA versus HSA for function and activity as well as Harris Hip scores and physical component of the SF-12 scores. In the MMSA group, 2 hips were revised to total hip arthroplasty for femoral loosening, and 5 hips had adverse radiological changes. In the HSA group, 4 hips were revised (1 sepsis and 3 for pain). There was no evidence of any femoral loosening or neck narrowing in the HSA group. Although the functional clinical outcome of MMSA is superior to HSA, long-term follow up of MMSA will determine the reliability of the femoral fixation.

Total resurfacing for osteonecrosis of the hip

With the resurgence of metal-on-metal bearings, there is renewed interest in total hip resurfacing. A cementless acetabular component used for resurfacing with a wall thickness of fewer than 5 mm is comparable in size to acetabular components used for total hip replacement. The fixation of a porous-ingrowth acetabular component used for resurfacing has been shown to be reliable and durable. There are few clinical reports of total hip resurfacing that stratify results by diagnosis. However, available evidence indicates that the pain relief, function, and activity after total hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis are superior to the results reported for hemiresurfacing and similar to the results of total hip replacement. Femoral-side failure is the main issue occurring with total resurfacing for osteonecrosis, and the femoral side failure rate is higher than that of hemiresurfacing. There are no simple guidelines for the extent of femoral head necrosis that are compatible with successful resurfacing. Refined patient selection and surgical technique can improve the outcomes and durability of total hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis.

Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis

BACKGROUND

Although the orientation of the femoral component has been shown to influence the outcome of total hip replacement, its effect on the clinical outcome of surface arthroplasty has not been studied, to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between femoral component positioning and the outcome of a surface arthroplasty of the hip.

METHODS

We reviewed the results of ninety-four hybrid metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties in patients who were forty years old or younger at the time of the operation and were followed for a minimum of two years or until the prosthesis failed. Measurements of the hip reconstruction were made on the anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. The correlation between the orientation of the femoral component and the outcome of the arthroplasty was evaluated, as were stresses within the resurfaced femoral head as a function of the orientation of the femoral component.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was 4.2 years. Thirteen hips had an adverse outcome, defined as conversion to a total hip replacement, radiolucency of >1 mm in thickness adjacent to the femoral stem, or narrowing of the femoral neck of >10%. The mean femoral stem-shaft angle in the coronal plane was 138 degrees, with the hips that had an adverse outcome having a significantly lower mean angle than the rest of the cohort (133 degrees compared with 139 degrees, p = 0.03). Hips with an angle of <or=130 degrees had an increase in the relative risk of an adverse outcome by a factor of 6.1 (p < 0.004). In the entire cohort, stresses in the superior aspect of the resurfaced femoral head were substantially lower during slow walking than they were during fast walking (7.1 N/mm(2) compared with 14.2 N/mm(2)).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimizing the femoral stem-shaft angle toward a valgus orientation during the preparation of the femoral head is important when a hip is being reconstructed with a surface arthroplasty because the resurfaced hip transmits the load through a narrow critical zone in the femoral head-neck region and the valgus angulation may reduce these stresses.