Clinical Practice Guideline to Improve Locomotor Function Following Chronic Stroke, Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, and Brain Injury

Task-Specific Versus Impairment-Based Training on Locomotor Performance in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Crossover Study

Background. Many research studies attempting to improve locomotor function following motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) focus on providing stepping practice. However, observational studies of physical therapy strategies suggest the amount of stepping practice during clinical rehabilitation is limited; rather, many interventions focus on mitigating impairments underlying walking dysfunction. Objective. The purpose of this blinded-assessor randomized trial was to evaluate the effects of task-specific versus impairment-based interventions on walking outcomes in individuals with iSCI. Methods. Using a crossover design, ambulatory participants with iSCI >1-year duration performed either task-specific (upright stepping) or impairment-based training for up to 20 sessions over ≤6 weeks, with interventions alternated after >4 weeks delay. Both strategies focused on achieving higher cardiovascular intensities, with training specificity manipulated by practicing only stepping practice in variable contexts or practicing tasks targeting impairments underlying locomotor dysfunction (strengthening, balance tasks, and recumbent stepping). Results. Significantly greater increases in fastest overground and treadmill walking speeds were observed following task-specific versus impairment-based training, with moderate associations between differences in amount of practice and outcomes. Gains in balance confidence were also observed following task-specific vs impairment-based training, although incidence of falls was also increased with the former protocol. Limited gains were observed with impairment-based training except for peak power during recumbent stepping tests. Conclusion. The present study reinforces work from other patient populations that the specificity of task practice is a critical determinant of locomotor outcomes and suggest impairment-based exercises may not translate to improvements in functional tasks. Clinical Trial Registration URL. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ; Unique Identifier: NCT02115685.

Task-Specific Versus Impairment-Based Training on Locomotor Performance in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Crossover Study

Background. Many research studies attempting to improve locomotor function following motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) focus on providing stepping practice. However, observational studies of physical therapy strategies suggest the amount of stepping practice during clinical rehabilitation is limited; rather, many interventions focus on mitigating impairments underlying walking dysfunction. Objective. The purpose of this blinded-assessor randomized trial was to evaluate the effects of task-specific versus impairment-based interventions on walking outcomes in individuals with iSCI. Methods. Using a crossover design, ambulatory participants with iSCI >1-year duration performed either task-specific (upright stepping) or impairment-based training for up to 20 sessions over ≤6 weeks, with interventions alternated after >4 weeks delay. Both strategies focused on achieving higher cardiovascular intensities, with training specificity manipulated by practicing only stepping practice in variable contexts or practicing tasks targeting impairments underlying locomotor dysfunction (strengthening, balance tasks, and recumbent stepping). Results. Significantly greater increases in fastest overground and treadmill walking speeds were observed following task-specific versus impairment-based training, with moderate associations between differences in amount of practice and outcomes. Gains in balance confidence were also observed following task-specific vs impairment-based training, although incidence of falls was also increased with the former protocol. Limited gains were observed with impairment-based training except for peak power during recumbent stepping tests. Conclusion. The present study reinforces work from other patient populations that the specificity of task practice is a critical determinant of locomotor outcomes and suggest impairment-based exercises may not translate to improvements in functional tasks. Clinical Trial Registration URL. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ; Unique Identifier: NCT02115685.

Use-dependent plasticity explains aftereffects in visually guided locomotor learning of a novel step length asymmetry

Studies of upper extremity reaching show that use-dependent plasticity, or learning from repetition, plays an important role in shaping motor behaviors. Yet the impact of repetition on locomotor learning is unclear, despite the fact that gait is developed and practiced over millions of repetitions. To test whether repetition alone can induce storage of a novel walking pattern, we instructed two groups of young healthy subjects to learn an asymmetric walking pattern through two distinct learning paradigms. The first group learned a new pattern through an established visual distortion paradigm, which provided both sensory prediction error and repetition of movement patterns to induce walking aftereffects, and the second received veridical feedback with a target change, which provided only repetition (use-dependent plasticity) to induce aftereffects. When feedback was removed, both groups demonstrated aftereffects in the primary outcome, step asymmetry index. Surprisingly, despite the different task demands, both groups produced similar aftereffect magnitudes, which also had similar rates of decay, suggesting that the addition of sensory prediction errors did not improve storage of learning beyond that induced by the use-dependent process alone. To further characterize the use-dependent process, we conducted a second experiment to quantify aftereffect size in a third group who practiced double the asymmetry magnitude. This new group showed a proportionately greater magnitude of the use-dependent aftereffect. Together, these findings show that the primary driver of storage of a new step length asymmetry during visually guided locomotor learning is repetition, not sensory prediction error, and this effect scales with the learning magnitude.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Use-dependent plasticity, or learning from repetition, is an important process for upper extremity reaching tasks, but its contribution to walking is not well established. Here, we demonstrate the existence of a dose-dependent, use-dependent process during visually guided treadmill walking. We also show that sensory prediction errors, previously thought to drive aftereffects in similar locomotor learning paradigms, do not appear to play a significant role in visually driven learning of a novel step asymmetry during treadmill walking.

Biomedical Serious Game System for Lower Limb Motor Rehabilitation of Hemiparetic Stroke Patients

Hemiparesis resulting from a stroke has a direct impact on patients' daily activities. New approaches for motor rehabilitation include Serious Games (SG) because they include (in a motivating way) the three fundamental elements for rehabilitation: intensive, repetitive and task-oriented training. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic effects of a biomedical SG and a scoring system developed for lower limb motor rehabilitation of hemiparetic stroke patients. The SG was inspired by the classic videogame called Pong, where the goal is to control a tennis racquet, but using muscular strength. A knee extensor apparatus was adapted with a load cell and mechanical adjustments for measuring the muscular strength of the quadriceps femoris (QFG) and hamstrings (HSG). A scoring system was proposed to evaluate muscular control. Eleven hemiparetic stroke patients participated in an exercise program using the SG twice a week for ten weeks and only the paretic side was trained. Significant Effect Sizes ( d ) were found for QFG strength ( d=0.5;p=0.021 ), QFG control ( ), HSG strength ( d=1.1; p = 0.001 ), HSG control ( d=1.5; p = 0.003 ), functional mobility ( ), gait speed ( d=0.4; p=0.007 ) and motor recovery ( ). Results indicate that the intervention of a SG with both proper apparatus and evaluation system may effectively promote lower limb motor rehabilitation of hemiparetic stroke patients.

Walking faster and farther with a soft robotic exosuit: Implications for post-stroke gait assistance and rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

Soft robotic exosuits can improve the mechanics and energetics of walking after stroke. Building on this prior work, we evaluated the effects of the first prototype of a portable soft robotic exosuit.

METHODS

Exosuit-induced changes in the overground walking speed, distance, and energy expenditure of individuals post-stroke were evaluated statistically with alpha set to 0.05 and compared to minimal clinically important difference scores.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline walking without the exosuit worn, the <5kg exosuit did not substantially modify walking speed, distance, or energy expenditure when worn unpowered. In contrast, when the exosuit was powered on to provide an average 22.87±0.58 %bodyweight of plantarflexor force assistance during the paretic limb's stance phase and assist the paretic dorsiflexors during swing phase to reduce drop-foot, study participants walked a median 0.14±0.06 m/s faster during the 10-meter walk test and traveled 32±8 m farther during the six minute walk test.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals post-stroke can leverage the paretic plantarflexor and dorsiflexor assistance provided by soft robotic exosuits to achieve clinically-meaningful increases in speed and distance.