Impact of replication timing on non-CpG and CpG substitution rates in mammalian genomes

Evaluating genome-scale approaches to eukaryotic DNA replication

Mechanisms regulating where and when eukaryotic DNA replication initiates remain a mystery. Recently, genome-scale methods have been brought to bear on this problem. The identification of replication origins and their associated proteins in yeasts is a well-integrated investigative tool, but corresponding data sets from multicellular organisms are scarce. By contrast, standardized protocols for evaluating replication timing have generated informative data sets for most eukaryotic systems. Here, I summarize the genome-scale methods that are most frequently used to analyse replication in eukaryotes, the kinds of questions each method can address and the technical hurdles that must be overcome to gain a complete understanding of the nature of eukaryotic replication origins.

Chromosomal distribution of disease genes in the human genome

Genes are nonrandomly distributed in the human genome, both within and between chromosomes. Thus, genes of similar function and common evolutionary origin are often clustered, as are genes with similar expression profiles. We now report that the >2400 genes known to underlie human monogenic inherited disease are non-randomly distributed in the genome over and above the general nonrandomness evident in the distribution of human genes. Further, a subset of 315 inherited disease genes subject to gross deletion was found to exhibit a degree of clustering that was twice that manifested by disease genes in general. The clustering of human disease genes is likely to have important implications for understanding the genotype-phenotype relationship in contiguous gene syndromes as well as those conditions characterized by multigene deletions or complex chromosomal rearrangements.

The genomic distribution and local context of coincident SNPs in human and chimpanzee

We have previously shown that there is an excess of sites that are polymorphic at orthologous positions in humans and chimpanzees and that this is most likely due to cryptic variation in the mutation rate. We showed that this might be a consequence of complex context effects since we found significant heterogeneity in triplet frequencies around coincident single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites. Here, we show that the heterogeneity in triplet frequencies is not specifically associated with coincident SNPs but is instead driven by base composition bias around CpG dinucleotides. As a result, we suggest that cryptic variation in the mutation rate is truly cryptic, in the sense that the mutation rate does not appear to depend on any specific primary sequence context. Furthermore, we propose that the patterns around CpG dinucleotides are driven by the mutability of CpG dinucleotides in different DNA contexts. We also show that the genomic distribution of coincident SNPs is nonuniform and that there are some subtle differences between the distributions of single and coincident SNPs. Furthermore, we identify regions that contain high numbers of coincident SNPs and suggest that one in particular, a region containing the gene PRIM2, may be under balancing selection.

Comparative analysis of DNA replication timing reveals conserved large-scale chromosomal architecture

Recent evidence suggests that the timing of DNA replication is coordinated across megabase-scale domains in metazoan genomes, yet the importance of this aspect of genome organization is unclear. Here we show that replication timing is remarkably conserved between human and mouse, uncovering large regions that may have been governed by similar replication dynamics since these species have diverged. This conservation is both tissue-specific and independent of the genomic G+C content conservation. Moreover, we show that time of replication is globally conserved despite numerous large-scale genome rearrangements. We systematically identify rearrangement fusion points and demonstrate that replication time can be locally diverged at these loci. Conversely, rearrangements are shown to be correlated with early replication and physical chromosomal proximity. These results suggest that large chromosomal domains of coordinated replication are shuffled by evolution while conserving the large-scale nuclear architecture of the genome.

During S-phase of the cell cycle, chromosomal DNA is replicated in a complex process involving the coordinated activity of thousands of replication forks, each of which duplicates a long stretch of DNA. Recent experiments revealed that the genome is replicating as a mosaic of large-scale early and late chromosomal domains and that this high-level domain organization is correlated with genomic properties like gene density and nucleotide composition. We compared genome-wide replication time maps of compatible human and mouse cells and revealed that their organization into replication domains is highly conserved despite the numerous large-scale genome rearrangements separating the two species. Analysis of recent chromosomal interaction data shows that regions with similar time of replication are more frequently interacting with each other than expected. The data also show that evolutionary rearrangements have predominantly occurred between regions that have similar time of replication and higher-than-expected chromosomal proximity. Our data suggests that the genome, while being continuously rearranged by evolution, maintains a conserved domain organization. Whether this conservation is driven by selection, or is a consequence of the rearrangement process itself, can be resolved by enhancing the comparative approach proposed here.