Ureteroscopic and percutaneous management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): systematic review

European guidelines on upper tract urothelial carcinomas: 2013 update

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline group for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in assessing the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate present recommendations into daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a brief overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians in their daily clinical practice.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified using a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUCs in the literature were searched using Medline with the following keywords: urinary tract cancer; urothelial carcinomas; upper urinary tract, carcinoma; renal pelvis; ureter; bladder cancer; chemotherapy; nephroureterectomy; adjuvant treatment; instillation; neoadjuvant treatment; recurrence; risk factors; nomogram; and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

There is a lack of data in the current literature to provide strong recommendations (ie, grade A) due to the rarity of the disease. A number of recent multicentre studies are now available, and there is a growing interest in UTUC in the recent literature. Overall, 135 references have been included here, but most of these studies are still retrospective analyses. The TNM 2009 classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis as well as radical and conservative treatment (ie, imperative and elective cases); additionally, prognostic factors are discussed. Recommendations are also provided for patient follow-up after different therapeutic options.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines contain information for the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Physicians must take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each individual patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen including tumour location, grade, and stage; renal function; molecular marker status; and medical comorbidities.

"Extreme" renal preservation: neoadjuvant chemotherapy and percutaneous resection for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma in a patient with solitary kidney--a case report

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Renal preservation in selected patients with upper-tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) has been well described, offering an alternative to radical nephroureterectomy. We present our experiences in performing percutaneous treatments after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in one such patient with a large, complex, high-grade UTUC in a solitary kidney.

CASE REPORT

A 55-year-old woman with a solitary kidney presented with a 5.2 cm enhancing mass with calcifications involving the left renal pelvis and lower pole. Cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography demonstrated normal bladder mucosa. Ureteroscopy revealed a large, papillary tumor occupying the renal pelvis. Ureteroscopic treatment was deemed impossible because of the lesion's volume. We proceeded with percutaneous resection after downsizing the tumor after a course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Using a 25F resectoscope via a percutaneous tract, resection was performed to fully excise the tumor, and the patient received two postoperative chemotherapy courses. A recurrence developed within an isolated calix 8 months postoperatively, which was also managed percutaneously.

CONCLUSION

A multimodal approach in a highly motivated patient could represent a reasonable strategy for patients in whom such a therapy is desired.

Results and outcomes after endoscopic treatment of upper urinary tract carcinoma: the Austrian experience

INTRODUCTION

Through evolution in technology, endoscopic treatment has gained popularity for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (ENDO-UTUC).

METHODS

A total of 20 patients with ENDO-UTUC were compared to 178 treated by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for a pTa-1 UTUC, and a systematic review was performed.

RESULTS

Mean age for ENDO-UTUC was 71.9 ± 16.0 years, and tumor features were favorable (90 % papillary, 14 low grade, 11 pTa). All ENDO-UTUC were performed ureteroscopically. Mean follow-up was 20.4 ± 30 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 45 %. Local (LR) and bladder recurrence (BR) was 25 and 15 %. Time to definitive treatment was longer, ASA higher, LR rates higher, OS lower for ENDO-UTUC (all p < 0.001), but no difference was recorded for BR (p = 0.056) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.364). Postoperative kidney function (KF) was better in the ENDO-UTUC (p = 0.048), though preoperative KF showed no difference. The maximal level of evidence was 3b, patients were highly selected, numbers of patients were low, and ASA scores high. OS was rather low and CSS high. LR rate was high (61 %) and BR rate moderate (39 %) for ureteroscopic and 36 and 28 %, respectively, for percutaneous approach.

CONCLUSIONS

LR for ENDO-UTUC is high. In high-grade UTUC, oncological outcome is worse. RNU is associated with a significant loss of KF, but LR is rare. ENDO-UTUC is reserved for selected cases if elective. In imperative cases, it has to be balanced between KF, morbidity of the procedure, risk of operation and tumor control. ENDO-UTUC is not necessarily underused in Austria, because of lack in evidence, but 41 % of all RNU were performed in pTa/pTis/pT1 lesions.

Long-term endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: 20-year single-centre experience

Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Endoscopic management of small, low-grade, non-invasive upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) is a management option for selected groups of patients. However, the long-term survival outcomes of endoscopically-managed UTUC are uncertain because only four institutions have reported outcomes of more than 40 patients beyond 50 months of follow-up. Moreover, there is significant variance in the degree of underlying UTUC pathology verification in some of these reports, which precludes an analysis of disease-specific survival outcomes. The present study represents one of the largest endoscopically managed series of patients with UTUC, with a long-term follow-up. The degree of verification of underlying UTUC pathology is one of the highest, which allows a grade-stratified analysis of different outcomes, including upper-tract recurrence-free survival, intravesical recurrence-free survival, renal unit survival and disease-specific survival. These outcomes provide further evidence suggesting that endoscopic management of highly selected, low-grade UTUC can provide effective oncological control, as well as renal preservation, in experienced centres.

OBJECTIVE

• To report the long-term outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) who were treated endoscopically (either via ureteroscopic ablation or percutaneous resection) at a single institution over a 20-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• Departmental operation records were reviewed to identify patients who underwent endoscopic management of UTUC as their primary treatment. • Outcomes were obtained via retrospective analysis of notes, electronic records and registry data. • Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), UTUC-specific survival (disease-specific survival; DSS), upper-tract recurrence-free survival, intravesical recurrence-free survival, renal unit survival and progression-free survival, were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and grade-stratified differences were analyzed using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

• Between January 1991 and April 2011, 73 patients underwent endoscopic management of UTUC with a median age at diagnosis of 67.7 years. • All patients underwent ureteroscopy and biopsy-confirmation of pathology was obtained in 81% (n = 59) of the patients. In total, 14% (n = 10) of the patients underwent percutaneous resection. • Median (range; mean) follow-up was 54 (1-223; 62.8) months. • Upper tract recurrence occurred in 68% (n = 50). Eventually, 19% (n = 14) of the patients proceeded to nephroureterectomy. • The estimated OS and DSS were 69.7% and 88.9%, respectively, at 5 years, and 40.3% and 77.4%, respectively, at 10 years. The estimated mean and median OS times were 119 months and 107 months, respectively. The estimated mean DSS time was 190 months.

CONCLUSIONS

• The present study represents one of the largest reported series of endoscopically-managed UTUC, with high pathological verification and long-term follow-up. • Upper-tract recurrence is common, which mandates regular ureteroscopic surveillance. • However, in selected patients, this approach has a favourable DSS, with a relatively low nephroureterectomy rate, and therefore provides oncological control and renal preservation in patients more likely to die eventually from other causes.