The ORION study: comparison of two sirolimus-based regimens versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients

Belatacept : a new biological agent for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decades, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have become the cornerstone of transplant immunosuppression. CNIs can exert negative effects on chronic allograft function along with cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic adverse effects. Belatacept , a selective co-stimulation blocker of T cells, is the first US FDA (06/2011) and EMEA (06/2011) approved biologic agent for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

The authors critically reviewed the literature over the last few years comparing belatacept with current standard of maintenance immunosuppression including CNIs in kidney transplantation.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the increased incidence and severity of acute rejection with belatacept in Phase II and III studies, a better preservation of GFR and reduced incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy was observed as compared with CNIs. Patient and graft survivals were similar over 3- and 5-year follow-up post-transplantation. Incidence of adverse events were similar between the groups, but the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, predominantly involving CNS, was higher in Epstein-Barr virus seronegative recipients on belatacept, especially with a more intensive regimen. CV and metabolic end points were more favorable in belatacept versus CNI groups with similar incidences of diabetes after transplantation. Belatacept seems to be a promising drug for the future, but long-term outcomes are awaited.

Five-year results of a randomized trial comparing de novo sirolimus and cyclosporine in renal transplantation: the SPIESSER study

Calcineurin inhibitors improve acute rejection rates and short-term graft survival in renal transplantation, but their continuous use may be deleterious. We evaluated the 5-year outcomes of sirolimus (SRL) versus cyclosporine (CsA) immunosuppressive treatment. This observational study was an extension of the SPIESSER study where deceased donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized before transplantation to a SRL- or CsA-based regimen and followed up 1 year. Data from 131 (63 SRL, 68 CsA) out of 133 patients living with a functional graft at 1 year were collected retrospectively at 5 years posttransplant. Seventy percent of CsA patients versus 54% of SRL patients were still on the allocated treatment at 5 years (p = 0.091), most discontinuations in each group being due to safety issues. In intent-to-treat, mean MDRD eGFR was higher with SRL: 54.2 versus 45.3 mL/min with CsA (p = 0.019); SRL advantage was greater in on-treatment analyses. There were no differences for patient survival (p = 0.873), graft survival (p = 0.121) and acute rejection (p = 0.284). Adverse events were more frequent with SRL (80% vs. 60%, p = 0.015). Results confirmed the high SRL discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Nevertheless, a benefit was evidenced on renal function in patients (more than 50%) still on treatment at 5 years.

Challenges and considerations in diagnosing the kidney disease in deteriorating graft function

Despite significant reductions in acute-rejection rates with the introduction of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive therapy, improvements in long-term graft survival in renal transplantation have been mixed. Improving long-term graft survival continues to present a major challenge in the management of kidney-transplant patients. CNIs are a key component of immunosuppressive therapy, and chronic CNI toxicity has been widely thought to be a major factor in late graft failure. However, recent studies examining the causes of late graft failure in detail have challenged this view, highlighting the importance of antibody-mediated rejection and other factors. In addition, the diagnosis of CNI nephrotoxicity represents a challenge to clinicians, with the potential for over-diagnosis and an inappropriate reduction in immunosuppressive therapy. When graft function is deteriorating, accurately determining the cause of the kidney disease is essential for effective long-term management of the patient. Diagnosis requires a thorough clinical investigation, and in the majority of cases a specific cause can be identified.

The over-exaggerated chronic nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors

Background

Late kidney allograft failure remains a major problem in kidney transplantation. While there is no doubt that acute nephrotoxicity from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) exists, chronic CNI nephrotoxicity has been the subject of much debate in the transplant community.

Methods

We identified original articles related to the use of CNIs in renal and extra-renal solid-organ transplantation, to examine the available evidence about their chronic nephrotoxicity.

Results

There is clearly a lack of firm evidence for the role of CNIs as a major injurious agent causing chronic renal dysfunction and allograft failure. Moreover, recent evidence shows that the pathological lesions typically linked to chronic CNI use are not specific. A growing body of evidence shows that alloimmunity is a much more important cause of late renal allograft failure.

Conclusions

More research should focus on addressing the true causes of chronic graft dysfunction rather than continuing to propagate the exaggerated contribution of CNIs to late graft loss.

Conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant: 3-year results from the randomized ZEUS study

The long-term effect of conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy to an mTOR inhibitor requires clarification. Following completion of the 12-month, open-label, multicenter ZEUS study, in which 300 kidney transplant recipients were randomized to continue cyclosporine (CsA) or convert to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant, outcomes were assessed at month 36 (n = 284; 94.7%). CNI therapy was reintroduced in 28.4% of everolimus patients by month 36. The primary efficacy endpoint, estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell, ANCOVA) was significantly higher with everolimus versus the CsA group at month 24 (7.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , 95%CI 4.3, 11.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ; p < 0.001) and month 36 (7.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) , 95%CI 3.6, 11.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ; p < 0.001). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection from randomization to month 36 was 13.0% in the everolimus arm and 4.8% in the CsA arm (p = 0.015). Patient and graft survival, as well as incidences of malignancy, severe infections and hospitalization, were similar between groups. Kidney transplant patients who are converted from CsA to everolimus at month 4.5 and who remain on everolimus thereafter may achieve a significant improvement in renal function that is maintained to 3 years. There was a significantly higher rate of rejection in the everolimus arm but this did not exert a deleterious effect by 3 years posttransplant.

Are calcineurin inhibitors-free regimens ready for prime time?

The goal of research in transplant therapeutics is to achieve safe and effective immunosuppression strategies that allow durable engraftment free of toxicities. The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) regimens, because of their inherent toxicities (including nephrotoxicity), have been unable to meet these promises. Over the past decade acute cellular rejection decreased dramatically with a concomitant robust increase in 1-year graft survival; however, long-term graft outcome showed only modest improvement. This is due in part to the toxicities of the immunosuppressive drugs. The quest for a toxicity-free-CNI-free regimen has been both intense and frustrating. A turning point in CNIs-free therapy may have occurred with the recent approval of belatacept, which represents a new paradigm in immunosuppression: biological therapy for chronic immunosuppression devoid of the usual toxicities associated with the CNIs. Belatacept, a fusion receptor protein, blocks costimulation signals necessary for the activation of T cells. Although costimulation blockade has not been shown to induce tolerance, it can provide safe and effective immunosuppression without renal or cardiovascular toxicities. The approval of belatacept in both the United States and Europe for use in renal transplantation will finally push CNI-free regimens into prime time. Novel biologics such as ASKP1240 (a human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody) and one small molecule, tofacitinib, may advance further the use of CNI-free regimens in organ transplantation.

Our evolving understanding of late kidney allograft failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dramatic improvement in short-term results after kidney transplantation has fostered a change in focus for clinical research: further improvement in patient outcomes requires better understanding of late allograft failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

As recently as a decade ago, with clinicians and investigators besot by the mistaken assumption that 'rejection' was under control, most late allograft failure was attributed to calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Application of newer laboratory-based techniques (C4d staining, solid-phase antibody assays, and molecular profiling) has resulted in a major shift in understanding late graft failure. New data from both clinic and laboratory indicate immunologic injury, perhaps potentiated by drug minimization, as the predominant cause of late allograft failure.

SUMMARY

This review traces our evolving understanding of the problem and what looks to be a paradigm change that offers new promise of effective intervention to improve long-term outcomes.

Fifty years in the vineyard of transplantation: looking back

The past 5 decades have documented remarkable advances in basic knowledge and clinical expertise in transplantation. The first 12 years of this half century of my participation in the enterprise were consumed with the isolation, chemical characterization, and application of histocompatibility antigens purified from mouse, guinea pig, and human tissues, demonstrating that their specificity was based on unique amino acid sequences in protein structures. Initial unsuccessful attempts to use native molecules to induce tolerance in rat renal or heart transplantation models were followed by limited success when they were administered with a brief perioperative course of cyclosporine (CsA). Production of allochimeric constructs of class I major histocompatibility complex molecules bearing donor-type amino acid substitutions into the host-type C-terminal portion of the α1 helix yielded tolerogens whose activity was not dependent on conditioning with CsA or total lymphoid irradiation (TLI). The allochimeric molecules serve as altered peptide ligands that induce an aberrant T-cell signal 1 response producing transplantation tolerance. The potent activity of CsA in this experimental model was extended to clinical settings. Pharmacologic tools were employed to explore intra- and interindividual variations in drug exposure leading to the development of a better drug formulation. However, the intrinsic nephrotoxicity of CsA necessitated marked 80% reductions in de novo drug exposure as were achieved by exploiting the synergistic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions of CsA with sirolimus. The final decade in this 50-year experience includes editorship of this journal with marked changes in its direction. These experiences have afforded insights into future avenues for preclinical exploration and therapeutic drug development.