Impact of high-inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the activities of nafcillin, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with gentamicin, in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model

Are drug clinical trials broadly applicable? The case of staphylococcal bacteraemia

Clinical trials are traditionally designed by pharmaceutical companies or clinical research organizations to address the requirements and regulations of national regulatory agencies such as the US Food and Drug Administration. The criteria for enrolment are strict and well-defined, necessitating the screening of large numbers of individuals for each subject enrolled. Common exclusion criteria include extremes of age and weight, pregnancy, previous treatment with effective antibiotics for the same infection, organ dysfunction, malignant diseases with a short survival time, advanced HIV etc. In clinical trials, cost, length of hospital stay, complexity of drug administration and patient and family preferences are rarely considered, and seldom make their way into the report of the trial. The limited patient population and under-representation of sicker, older individuals leads to underestimation of drug toxicity and overestimation of efficacy. Postmarketing studies are commonly used to document adverse reactions, but they are not supported by industry and receive limited funding. We chose to evaluate the applicability to general staphylococcal bacteraemia patient populations of clinical trials comparing antimicrobial agents used to treat Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications

The emergence of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) over the past decade has provided a challenge to diagnostic microbiologists to detect these strains, clinicians treating patients with infections due to these strains, and researchers attempting to understand the resistance mechanisms. Recent data show that these strains have been detected globally and in many cases are associated with glycopeptide treatment failure; however, more rigorous clinical studies are required to clearly define the contribution of hVISA to glycopeptide treatment outcomes. It is now becoming clear that sequential point mutations in key global regulatory genes contribute to the hVISA and VISA phenotypes, which are associated predominately with cell wall thickening and restricted vancomycin access to its site of activity in the division septum; however, the phenotypic features of these strains can vary because the mutations leading to resistance can vary. Interestingly, changes in the staphylococcal surface and expression of agr are likely to impact host-pathogen interactions in hVISA and VISA infections. Given the subtleties of vancomycin susceptibility testing against S. aureus, it is imperative that diagnostic laboratories use well-standardized methods and have a framework for detecting reduced vancomycin susceptibility in S. aureus.

Limitations of antibiotic options for invasive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: is combination therapy the answer?

Invasive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), particularly those involving persistent bacteraemia, necrotizing pneumonia, osteomyelitis and other deep-seated sites of infections, are associated with high mortality and are often difficult to treat. The response to treatment of severe MRSA infection with currently available antibiotics active against MRSA is often unsatisfactory, leading some physicians to resort to combination antibiotic therapy. Now, with the emergence of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) clones that display enhanced virulence potentially related to up-regulated toxin production, the use of adjuvant protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics to reduce toxin production also has been advocated by some experts. In this review, we discuss the limitations of antibiotics currently available for the treatment of serious invasive MRSA infections and review the existing literature that examines the potential role of combination therapy in these infections.

Future treatment options for Gram-positive infections--looking ahead

Multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections remain a significant therapeutic problem, especially those due to Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial choice is only one aspect of the management of these infections. New immunotherapies, exploitation of novel antibiotic targets, topical therapies and new drug delivery systems may have a future role in the management of S. aureus infection. At present, injectable antimicrobials are the main area of drug development and clinical interest. Since 1999, five anti-Gram-positive agents (moxifloxacin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline) have become available in the EU. At present, three other anti-Gram-positive agents are being considered by the European Medicines Agency (ceftobiprole, gemifloxacin and iclaprim), and a further four have completed phase III clinical trials (ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin). The antibacterial spectra of these agents, their in vitro potencies, bactericidal activities and pharmacokinetics are well known. The safety profiles for those agents that have received regulatory approval and entered clinical practice are also firmly established. Most of the agents are pharmacodynamically promising and effective in clinical trials. As in the past, drug safety is likely to be a major determinant of which of the most recent drugs receive regulatory approval, and, in the long term, which agents will be successful in clinical practice.

Activity of linezolid in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using different dosages and Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis strains with and without a hypermutator phenotype

The influence of antibiotic dosages and bacterial mutator phenotypes on the emergence of linezolid-resistant mutants was evaluated in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. A twice-daily 0.5-h infusion of a 200-, 600-, or 800-mg dose for 48 h was simulated against four strains (MIC, 2 microg/ml): Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 and its mutator derivative MutS2, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, and a mutator clinical strain of E. faecalis, Ef1497. The peak concentrations (4.38 to 4.79, 13.4 to 14.6, and 19.2 to 19.5 microg/ml) and half-lives at beta-phase (5.01 to 6.72 h) fit human plasma linezolid pharmacokinetics. Due to its bacteriostatic property, the cumulative percentages of the dosing interval during which the drug concentration exceeded the MIC (T > MIC), 66.6 and 69.1% of the dosing interval, were not significant, except for Ef1497, with an 800-mg dose and a T > MIC of 80.9%. At the standard 600-mg dosage, resistant mutants (2- to 8-fold MIC increases) were selected only with Ef1497. A lower, 200-mg dosage did not select resistant mutants of E. faecalis ATCC 29212, but a higher, 800-mg dosage against Ef1497 did not prevent their emergence. For the most resistant mutant (MIC, 16 microg/ml), characterization of 23S rRNA genes revealed the substitution A2453G in two of the four operons, which was previously described only in in vitro mutants of archaebacteria. Nevertheless, this mutant did not yield further mutants under 600- or 200-mg treatment. In conclusion, linezolid was consistently efficient against S. aureus strains. The emergence of resistant E. faecalis mutants was probably favored by the rapid decline of linezolid concentrations against a strong mutator, a phenotype less exceptional in E. faecalis than in S. aureus.

Maximizing positive outcomes for patients with staphylococcal infections

Maximizing positive outcomes for serious Gram-positive infections, such as those caused by Staphylococcus species, requires an aggressive treatment approach. Although specific approaches will depend upon many factors, the underlying common strategy should recognize the positive contribution of minimizing complications and inpatient treatment duration and the efficient use of healthcare resources, while also focusing on rapid resolution of infection and safety and tolerability. To advance the standard of care for patients, we need to utilize therapies that enable such a range of factors to be improved. Treatment guidelines are useful to establish evidence-based standards of care, but they are updated infrequently and there is currently no pan-European consensus for the treatment of staphylococcal infections. With the benefit of the clinical experience that has been acquired for the most recently licensed antibiotics, together with an appreciation of the appropriate usage of older agents, there are good prospects for achieving positive outcomes earlier and in a greater range of patients with staphylococcal infections, and treatment guidelines should be updated regularly to reflect this.

Lack of bactericidal antagonism or synergism in vitro between oxacillin and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus

With the current high prevalence of infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains but in light of the general belief that beta-lactam antibiotics are more effective than vancomycin against infections caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates, clinicians may utilize antistaphylococcal penicillins in combination with vancomycin for the empirical treatment of S. aureus infections. Vancomycin is considered to kill MSSA more slowly than oxacillin. Thus, we sought to evaluate the interaction of the combination of oxacillin and vancomycin on bacterial killing in vitro. Ten clinical isolates of MSSA isolated in the year 2000 were investigated. The killing observed at 24 h by vancomycin at 20 microg/ml, oxacillin at 16 microg/ml, or the combination did not differ (approximately 2.5 to 3.5 log10 CFU/ml). In a separate experiment, we assessed bacterial killing in a dynamic model simulating the free plasma concentration profiles expected following the administration of a combination of vancomycin at 1 g every 12 h and oxacillin at 1 g every 6 h. The time-kill profiles of these regimens against S. aureus ATCC 29213 were comparable to those observed in the fixed-concentration experiments. Using these methods, we found no evidence that vancomycin antagonized the bactericidal effect of oxacillin or that there was any benefit from use of the combination.

Effects of daptomycin in combination with other antimicrobial agents: a review of in vitro and animal model studies

This review summarizes the in vitro and animal model data available on antibiotic combinations with daptomycin. The majority of studies focus on the clinically relevant combinations of daptomycin with rifampicin or with gentamicin. These studies demonstrate that daptomycin does not adversely affect the activity of other antimicrobial agents that may be administered concomitantly. Overall, additive or indifferent effects with daptomycin combinations were observed; however, synergy was observed for certain isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci when exposed to daptomycin and rifampicin. Unexpected synergy was demonstrated against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by daptomycin and beta-lactams. Most importantly, no in vitro antagonism of daptomycin with any other agent tested was confirmed in these studies. The most striking in vivo effects were noted in two different complicated infection models; i.e. osteomyelitis and implant infections, where rifampicin combinations with daptomycin increased efficacy and reduced the incidence of rifampicin resistance.

Susceptibility relationship between vancomycin and daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus: facts and assumptions

The decrease in vancomycin treatment efficacy that is accompanying increases in vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) within the susceptible range (so-called MIC creep) has led to the suggestion that vancomycin is losing its potency in treating serious Staphylococcus aureus infections. Understanding the clinical importance of the microbiological effects of glycopeptides on bacterial lipopeptides and lipoglycopeptides will be crucial in treating serious meticillin-resistant S aureus infections. We review the observed effects of reduced glycopeptide susceptibility on the activities of daptomycin in S aureus in vitro and in vivo. Factors associated with loss of susceptibility and ways to reduce the risk of resistance to daptomycin are reviewed, including the importance of prompt mechanical reduction of bacterial inoculum through surgery or through potent or combination antibiotic therapy, as well as optimisation of daptomycin pharmacodynamic exposure.

Evidence for daptomycin Etest lot-related MIC elevations for Staphylococcus aureus

MIC testing was performed simultaneously by Etest and broth microdilution (BMD) on 587 Staphylococcus aureus isolates submitted by local laboratories to a reference laboratory for confirmatory testing (May 2005 to July 2008). Testing bias was assessed for Etest to BMD MIC ratios. Categoric and essential agreement, very major (BMD nonsusceptible, Etest susceptible), and major (BMD susceptible, Etest nonsusceptible) errors were evaluated. Agar and broth calcium concentrations were consistent with current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and manufacturer recommendations. There was a consistent bias for higher Etest MIC values compared with BMD. Ratios ranged from 0.25 to 4 (average 1.3), with substantial variability noted among the 8 different Etest lots tested. Overall, 6% of all ratios were >2.0. Categoric agreement and essential agreement among the 8 Etest lots ranged from 73% to 96% and 74% to 100%, respectively; very major errors ranged from 3% to 9%, and major errors ranged from 6% to 35%. However, most of the discrepancies were limited to 3 Etest lots.

Occurrence of vancomycin-tolerant and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains (hVISA) among Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infections in nine USA hospitals

BACKGROUND

The bactericidal activities of vancomycin and daptomycin were evaluated in a large collection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia strains from nine major USA medical centres.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the occurrence of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) among MRSA strains tolerant to vancomycin and/or with increased vancomycin or daptomycin MIC values. The accuracy of the macro Etest method (MET) compared with population analysis profiling (PAP) for the detection of hVISA was also assessed.

METHODS

A total of 1800 MRSA strains were collected from bloodstream infections at the nine sites (40 strains per year, per medical centre during the 2002-06 study period). Vancomycin and daptomycin MIC testing was performed by reference broth microdilution (all strains) and MBC tests on 50% of strains (randomly selected). A subset of isolates (n = 268) having an increased vancomycin MBC (> or =16 mg/L), an increased vancomycin MIC (> or =1 mg/L) and/or an increased daptomycin MIC (>0.5 mg/L) were tested for susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin by MET.

RESULTS

Overall, 181 of 900 (20.1%) MRSA tested exhibited vancomycin tolerance, varying from 10% to 43% among the medical centres evaluated, and from 11.7% in 2004 to 27.8% in 2005. No resistance trend was observed in any medical centre or in the overall study data. Daptomycin showed bactericidal activity against all strains tested. The accuracy of MET for identifying hVISA strains varied significantly with the criteria applied for positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequently used criteria to define hVISA, i.e. MET reading values > or =8 mg/L for both vancomycin and teicoplanin or > or =12 mg/L for teicoplanin only, detected 20 of 36 PAP-positive strains (55.6% sensitivity), indicating that the prevalence of hVISA could be higher than currently appreciated. Daptomycin was bactericidal against hVISA strains.

Addition of gentamicin or rifampin does not enhance the effectiveness of daptomycin in treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

This study evaluated the activity of daptomycin combined with either gentamicin or rifampin against three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates in vitro and one isolate in vivo against a representative strain (MRSA-572). Time-kill experiments showed that daptomycin was bactericidal against these strains at concentrations over the MIC. Daptomycin at sub-MIC concentrations plus gentamicin at 1x and 2x the MIC yielded synergy, while the addition of rifampin at 2 to 4 microg/ml resulted in indifference (two strains) or antagonism (one strain). The in vivo activity of daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight once a day) was evaluated +/- gentamicin (1 mg/kg intravenously [i.v.] every 8 h [q8h]) or rifampin (300 mg i.v. q8h) in a rabbit model of infective endocarditis by simulating human pharmacokinetics. Daptomycin plus gentamicin (median, 0 [interquartile range, 0 to 2] log10 CFU/g vegetation) was as effective as daptomycin alone (0 [0 to 2] log10 CFU/g vegetation) in reducing the density of bacteria in valve vegetations (P = 0.83), and both were more effective than daptomycin plus rifampin (3 [2 to 3.5] log10 CFU/g vegetation; P < 0.05) for the strain studied. In addition, daptomycin sterilized a ratio of vegetations that was similar to that of daptomycin plus gentamicin (10/15 [67%] versus 9/15 [60%]; P = 0.7), and both regimens did so more than daptomycin plus rifampin (3/15 [20%]; P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). No statistical difference was noted between daptomycin plus gentamicin and daptomycin alone for MRSA treatment. In the combination arm, all isolates from vegetations remained susceptible to daptomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin. Sixty-one percent of the isolates (8/13) acquired resistance to rifampin during monotherapy. In the daptomycin arm, resistance was detected in only one case, in which the daptomycin MIC rose to 2 microg/ml among the recovered bacteria. In conclusion, the addition of gentamicin or rifampin does not enhance the effectiveness of daptomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to MRSA.

Evaluating aztreonam and ceftazidime pharmacodynamics with Escherichia coli in combination with daptomycin, linezolid, or vancomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model

In an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, linezolid attenuated the activity of aztreonam and ceftazidime against Escherichia coli. Conversely, synergy was detected at 24 and 48 h when daptomycin or vancomycin was added to aztreonam and ceftazidime. We conclude that significant yet underappreciated interactions may occur between gram-positive-spectrum and gram-negative-spectrum antibacterials.

Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin at simulated epithelial lining fluid concentrations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): implications for dosing in MRSA pneumonia

Little is known regarding killing activity of vancomycin against methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in pneumonia since the extent of vancomycin penetration into epithelial lining fluid (ELF) has not been definitively established. We evaluated the impact of the extent of ELF penetration on bacterial killing and resistance by simulating a range of vancomycin exposures (24-h free drug area under the concentration-time curve [fAUC24]/MIC) using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model and population-based mathematical modeling. A high-dose, 1.5-g-every-12-h vancomycin regimen according to American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines (trough concentration, 15 mg/liter) with simulated ELF/plasma penetration of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100% (fAUC24/MIC of 0, 70, 140, 210, 280, or 350) was evaluated against two agr-functional, group II MRSA clinical isolates obtained from patients with a bloodstream infection (MIC = 1.0 mg/liter) at a high inoculum of 10(8) CFU/ml. Despite high vancomycin exposures and 100% penetration, all regimens up to a fAUC24/MIC of 350 did not achieve bactericidal activity. At regimens of < or = 60% penetration (fAUC24/MIC < or = 210), stasis and regrowth occurred, amplifying the development of intermediately resistant subpopulations. Regimens simulating > or = 80% penetration (fAUC24/MIC > or = 280) suppressed development of resistance. Resistant mutants amplified by suboptimal vancomycin exposure displayed reduced rates of autolysis (Triton X-100) at 72 h. Bacterial growth and death were well characterized by a Hill-type model (r2 > or = 0.984) and a population pharmacodynamic model with a resistant and susceptible subpopulation (r2 > or = 0.965). Due to the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate resistance at a fAUC24/MIC of < or = 210, exceeding this exposure breakpoint in ELF may help to guide optimal dosage regimens in the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.

Activities of daptomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin and gentamicin against biofilm-forming methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an experimental model of endocarditis

The findings of clinical and in vitro research support the theory that infective endocarditis (IE)-causing bacteria form biofilms and that biofilms negatively affect treatment outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to quantify the biofilm formation of methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates obtained from patients with IE and to evaluate the in vitro activities of daptomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin (rifampicin) or gentamicin while monitoring the isolates for the development of resistance. A high-inoculum, stationary-phase infection model of IE was used to simulate the pharmacokinetics in humans of daptomycin at 6 mg/kg of body weight/day, vancomycin at 1.25 g every 12 h (q12h) alone and in combination with rifampin at 300 mg every 8 h, and gentamicin at 1.3 mg/kg q12h. Two randomly selected clinical MRSA isolates were obtained from patients with IE; both MRSA isolates quantitatively produced biofilms. The time to bactericidal activity in the presence of daptomycin was isolate dependent but was achieved by 24 h for both MRSA isolates. Vancomycin did not achieve bactericidal activity throughout the experiment. At 24, 48, and 72 h, daptomycin-containing regimens had significantly more activity (greater declines in the mean number of CFU/g) than any of the vancomycin-containing regimens (P = 0.03). Rifampin and gentamicin antagonized or delayed the bactericidal activity of daptomycin (against MRSA B346846 for rifampin and against both isolates for gentamicin) in the first 24 h. Increases in the daptomycin and vancomycin MICs were not observed. We conclude that in an IE model of biofilm-forming MRSA, daptomycin monotherapy has better in vitro activity than daptomycin in combination with rifampin or gentamicin or any vancomycin-containing regimen studied within the first 24 h. Further investigations are needed to understand the initial delay in bactericidal activity observed when gentamicin or rifampin is combined with daptomycin.

Management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections

This review addresses selected aspects of the management of severe healthcare-associated infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), including the limitations of current therapy, potential alternative agents, new therapeutic options, clinical approaches to MRSA bacteraemia/endocarditis and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and strategies to improve outcomes in patients with severe MRSA infections.

Loss of vancomycin bactericidal activity against accessory gene regulator (agr) dysfunctional Staphylococcus aureus under conditions of high bacterial density

The impact of accessory gene regulator (agr) dysfunction and high bacterial density on vancomycin killing and resistance was evaluated among 10 clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream isolates using time kill experiments. Under conditions of high inocula and agr dysfunction, vancomycin activity was markedly attenuated, amplifying resistant mutants by 72 h.

Treatment strategies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in pediatrics

Staphylococcus aureus is an important pathogen that frequently causes clinical disease in children. A wide array of illnesses can be caused by this common pathogen ranging from non-invasive skin infections to severe, life-threatening sepsis. Additionally, as antibacterials have been used to eradicate S. aureus, it has developed resistance to these important therapeutic agents. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has become an increasing problem in pediatric patients over the past decade. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment options available in treating MRSA infections in children. Specifically, we address the importance of abscess drainage in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, the most common clinical manifestation of MRSA infections, and highlight the various agents that are available for treating this common infection. In severe, life-threatening invasive MRSA infections the primary therapeutic option is vancomycin. In cases of MRSA toxic shock syndrome the addition of clindamycin is necessary. In other invasive MRSA infections, such as pneumonia and musculoskeletal infections, the empiric treatment of choice is clindamycin. Finally, newer agents and additional treatment options are discussed.

Inhibitory and bactericidal activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from 1985 to 2007

The inhibitory and bactericidal activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin against a collection of 479 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates were assessed. The isolates were collected from U.S. and European hospitals from 1985 to 2007 and were primarily from blood and abscess cultures. The MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of the three agents were determined, and the MBC/MIC ratios were calculated to determine the presence or absence of tolerance. Tolerance was defined as an MBC/MIC ratio of > or = 32 or an MBC/MIC ratio of > or = 16 when the MBC was greater than or equal to the breakpoint for resistance. Tolerance to vancomycin and teicoplanin was observed in 6.1% and 18.8% of the strains, respectively. Tolerance to daptomycin was not observed.

Functional relationship between bacterial cell density and the efficacy of antibiotics

OBJECTIVES

To determine the functional relationship between the density of bacteria and the pharmacodynamics of antibiotics, and the potential consequences of this inoculum effect on the microbiological course of antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections.

METHODS

In vitro time-kill, MIC estimation and antibiotic bioassay experiments were performed with S. aureus ATCC 25923 to ascertain the functional relationship between rates of kill and the MICs of six classes of antibiotics and the density of bacteria exposed. The potential consequences of the observed inoculum effects on the microbiological course of antibiotic treatment are explored with a mathematical model.

RESULTS

Modest or substantial inoculum effects on efficacy were observed for all six antibiotics studied, such as density-dependent declines in the rate and extent of antibiotic-mediated killing and increases in MIC. Although these measures of antibiotic efficacy declined with inoculum, this density effect did not increase monotonically. At higher densities, the rate of kill of ciprofloxacin and oxacillin declined with the antibiotic concentration. For daptomycin and vancomycin, much of this inoculum effect is due to density-dependent reductions in the effective concentration of the antibiotic. For the other four antibiotics, this density effect is primarily associated with a decrease in per-cell antibiotic concentration. With parameters in the range estimated, our mathematical model predicts that the course of antibiotic treatment can be affected by cell density; treatment protocols based on conventional (density-independent) MICs can fail to clear higher density infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The MICs used for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices should be functions of the anticipated densities of the infecting population.

Impact of inoculum size and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) on vancomycin activity and emergence of VISA in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model

The activity of vancomycin against heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) and non-hVISA isolates, using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, was reduced in the presence of a high inoculum amount (10(8) CFU/ml). A high bacterial load of >10(5) CFU/ml persisted for all strains with doses up to 5 g every 12 h against high inoculum amounts. No change in the vancomycin MIC was detected in any isolate at a moderate inoculum amount (10(6) CFU/ml), and bactericidal activity occurred only against the non-hVISA isolate (time to 99% kill, 7.5 h; P = 0.001).

Endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus: A reappraisal of the epidemiologic, clinical, and pathologic manifestations with analysis of factors determining outcome

Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of infectious endocarditis and its mortality has remained high despite better diagnostic and therapeutic procedures over time. We conducted a retrospective review of 133 cases of definite S. aureus endocarditis seen at a single tertiary care hospital over 22 years to assess changes in the epidemiology and incidence of the infection, manifestations, outcome, risk factors for mortality, and impact of cardiac surgery on prognosis.Patients were classified into 2 groups: 1) right-sided endocarditis (64 patients) and 2) left-sided endocarditis (69 patients). While the number of cases of left-sided endocarditis remained steady at 1-3 cases per 10,000 admissions, the incidence of right-sided endocarditis, after a peak in the early 1990s, declined to almost disappear in 2001. Among the cases of right-sided endocarditis, we found 2 subsets of patients with different clinical features and prognosis: the first subset comprised 53 intravenous drug abusers, and the second subset comprised 11 patients with catheter-associated S. aureus bacteremia and endocarditis. Fifty-one patients were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive drug abusers, most of whom (80.3%) had right-sided endocarditis. We did not find differences in mortality between HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals; mortality seemed to depend more on the site of the heart involved than on HIV status.Among the cases of left-sided endocarditis, the mitral valve was more commonly involved than the aortic valve (61% vs. 30%). Overall, 74% of patients with left-sided endocarditis developed 1 or more cardiac or extracardiac complication. In comparison, only 23.4% of patients with right-sided endocarditis developed complications.Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) was hospital-acquired more frequently than native valve endocarditis (NVE). Patients with PVE had a shorter duration of symptoms until diagnosis and presented with or developed cardiac murmurs less frequently than patients with NVE. Cardiac failure (49%), renal failure (43%) and central nervous system (CNS) events (35%) were frequently observed in patients with both PVE and NVE. Valve replacement was more frequently needed and more rapidly performed in patients with PVE than in their counterparts with NVE.The overall mortality of patients with right-sided endocarditis was 17%. While the mortality of right-sided endocarditis in injection drug users was 3.7%, the mortality of patients with right-sided endocarditis associated with infected intravenous catheters was 82% (odds ratio [OR], 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.001-0.07). For left-sided endocarditis mortality was 38% and was not significantly different in patients with NVE or PVE (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.23-1.87). CNS complications were associated with mortality in both NVE (OR, 6.55; 95% CI, 1.78-24.04) and PVE (OR, 32; 95% CI, 2.63-465.40). Development of 2 or 3 complications was associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR, 5.59; 95% CI, 1.08-28.80 and OR, 9.25; 95% CI, 1.36-62.72 for 2 vs. 1 complication and for 3 vs. 2 complications, respectively).Surgical treatment did not significantly influence mortality in cases of NVE, (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 0.76-13.38) but significantly improved the prognosis of patients with PVE (OR, 69; 95% CI, 2.89-1647.18).S. aureus endocarditis is an aggressive, often fatal, infection. The results of the current study suggest that valve replacement will improve the outcome of infection, particularly in patients with PVE.

Linezolid pharmacodynamics with Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic model

To describe the relationship between the ratio of the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(24)) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as well as the effect of linezolid on Staphylococcus aureus, the killing kinetics of three S. aureus strains was studied by in vitro simulation of 5-day antibiotic dosing over a wide range of AUC(24)/MIC ratios. Similarly susceptible meticillin-resistant S. aureus ATCC 43300 and S. aureus 479 and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus ATCC 700699 (Mu50) at a starting inoculum of 10(8) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL were exposed to multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of twice-daily linezolid for 5 days. The simulated AUC(24)/MIC ratios varied from 30 h to 1200 h (S. aureus ATCC 43300), from 30h to 600 h (S. aureus 479) and from 50h to 400 h (S. aureus ATCC 700699). The cumulative antimicrobial effect was expressed by its intensity (I(E)) measured from the start of treatment to the time after the last antibiotic dose when numbers of antibiotic-exposed bacteria reached >or=10(8)CFU/mL. With each organism, bacterial re-growth followed a pronounced reduction of the starting inoculum that occurred at each simulated AUC(24)/MIC ratio except for the lowest value (30 h). This reduction was AUC(24)/MIC-dependent: the minimum numbers of surviving organisms decreased with increasing AUC(24)/MIC ratios. A sigmoid relationship was established between I(E) and the simulated AUC(24)/MIC ratio. This relationship was bacterial strain-independent; a logistic function fits the combined data with r(2)=0.95. The established AUC(24)/MIC-I(E) relationship is useful to predict the antistaphylococcal effects of linezolid at clinically attainable AUC(24)/MIC values.

Pre-clinical experience with daptomycin

Daptomycin is a broad-spectrum, bactericidal agent active against Gram-positive bacteria, acting largely and unusually through membrane depolarization. Activity is markedly affected in vitro by the availability of calcium ions, and its high molecular weight with associated poor diffusion means that conventional disc diffusion testing is not reliable (and as a consequence not available). In order to allow susceptibility categorization, it is recommended that the MIC be determined in the presence of a defined calcium concentration. The activity of daptomycin is concentration-dependent with a prolonged post-antibiotic effect. It has linear pharmacokinetics, with a half-life of 8-9 h, the primary route of excretion is renal, it exhibits serum protein binding of approximately 92% and there is no interaction with the P450 cytochrome. Daptomycin is inactivated by surfactant in the lung and, in consequence, is not recommended for the treatment of respiratory infections. Daptomycin is currently licensed for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections and for bacteraemia and right-sided endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus. To date, daptomycin-resistant bacteria have rarely been isolated from patients, although increases in vancomycin MIC may be linked to reduced susceptibility to daptomycin. Close monitoring of resistance is essential to maintain the clinical utility of the drug. Using once-daily dosing, daptomycin has been generally well tolerated; however, weekly monitoring of creatinine phosphokinase is recommended, as myopathy in skeletal muscles has been seen, albeit rarely. The rapid bactericidal action of daptomycin makes it a useful addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of Gram-positive infections, providing a valuable alternative to vancomycin when it is inappropriate or resistance is a problem.

Daptomycin in endocarditis and bacteraemia: a British perspective

Assessment of the place of daptomycin in the treatment of endocarditis and bacteraemia requires assimilation of data from one open-label randomized comparative clinical trial sized for equivalence, from registry data and from case reports. Selected relevant animal models and in vitro data are also considered in an effort to produce an integrated assessment of the current place of daptomycin in treatment. The evidence for the use of daptomycin is best in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and endocarditis, but also includes some data on infections due to Enterococcus spp., especially if vancomycin-resistant. The emergence of resistance in a minority of patients on current dose regimens may mean that trials have to be repeated with higher doses, or the drug used in a combined therapy where rifampicin may be the best choice. In general, equivalence to comparator antibiotic regimens and a correlation for in vitro and in vivo findings have been demonstrated, but there are important gaps in the clinical data including a comparative equivalence trial in streptococcal and enterococcal endocarditis. Clinical benefit might be anticipated, but has not been proved, over aminoglycoside-containing regimens, and economic assessments are critical in the decision as to when and how daptomycin is deployed.

Evaluation of daptomycin pharmacodynamics and resistance at various dosage regimens against Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibilities to daptomycin in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations

The need to investigate novel dosing regimens and combinations is essential in combating poor treatment outcomes for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis. We evaluated the impact of simulated standard- and high-dose daptomycin in combination with gentamicin or rifampin against daptomycin-susceptible and nonsusceptible matched strains of S. aureus. These strains were collected from the daptomycin bacteremia and endocarditis clinical trial and consisted of three susceptible strains (MIC, 0.25 mg/liter) and four nonsusceptible isolates (MICs, 2 to 4 mg/liter). Daptomycin regimens of 6 and 10 mg/kg of body weight daily alone and in combination with gentamicin at 5 mg/kg daily or rifampin at 300 mg every 8 h were evaluated using an in vitro model with simulated endocardial vegetations over 96 h. Rapid bactericidal activity, identified by time to 99.9% kill, was displayed in all regimens with the daptomycin-susceptible strains. Concentration-dependent activity was noted by more-rapid killing with the 10-mg/kg/day dose. The addition of gentamicin improved activity in the majority of susceptible isolates. Daptomycin 6-mg/kg/day monotherapy displayed bactericidal activity for only one of the nonsusceptible isolates and for only two isolates with increased doses of 10 mg/kg/day. Combination regimens demonstrated improvement with some but not all nonsusceptible isolates. Three isolates developed a reduction in daptomycin susceptibility with 6-mg/kg/day monotherapy, but this was suppressed with both combination therapy and high-dose daptomycin. These results suggest that high-dose daptomycin therapy and combination therapy may be reasonable treatment options for susceptible isolates; however, more investigations are needed to confirm the variability of these regimens with nonsusceptible isolates.

Future strategies for treating Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections

Bloodstream infections are potentially life-threatening diseases. They can cause serious secondary infections, such as infective endocarditis and osteomyelitis, and may result in severe sepsis. One of the most critical determinants of survival is the induction of timely and effective antibiotic therapy. One of the leading causes of bloodstream infections is Staphylococcus aureus, with an increasing proportion of isolates being resistant to methicillin. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is associated with greater morbidity and mortality rates than methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). Standard-of-care antibiotic treatments for S. aureus bloodstream infections are limited by toxicity and/or differential efficacy against MRSA and MSSA, which makes the choice of empirical therapy difficult. New management strategies are required to address the challenges raised by S. aureus bloodstream infections and MRSA in particular. These may include the use of techniques that allow the early identification of complications arising from S. aureus bacteraemia, rapid pathogen identification to enable the administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy, and the identification of new drugs with novel modes of action that may circumvent antibiotic resistance and enable effective empirical treatment of both MSSA and MRSA infections.

Activities of clindamycin, daptomycin, doxycycline, linezolid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with inducible clindamycin resistance in murine thigh infection and in vitro pharmacodynamic models

Controversy exists about the most effective treatment options for community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) and about the ability of these strains to develop inducible resistance to clindamycin during therapy. Using both in vitro pharmacodynamic and murine thigh infection models, we evaluated and compared several antimicrobial compounds against CA-MRSA. Strains with inducible macrolide lincosamide-streptogramin type B (iMLS(B)) resistance and strains in which resistance was noninducible were evaluated. Two levels of inocula (10(5) and 10(7)) were evaluated for clindamycin activity in the in vivo model. In both models, the antimicrobial evaluation was performed in triplicate, and bacterial quantification occurred over 72 h, with drug doses that were designed to simulate the free drug area-under-the-concentration-time curve values (fAUCs) obtained from human samples. When the activity of clindamycin against the iMLS(B) strains was evaluated, constitutive resistance was noted at 24 h (MIC of >256), and failure was noted at an inoculum of > or =10(6) in the in vivo models. However, at a low inoculum (10(5)) in the murine thigh-infection model, clindamycin demonstrated modest activity, reducing the CFU/thigh count for clindamycin resistance-inducible strains at 72 h (0.45 to 1.3 logs). Overall, administration of daptomycin followed by vancomycin demonstrated the most significant kill against all strains in both models. Against the clindamycin noninducible strain, clindamycin and doxycycline demonstrated significant kill. Doxycycline, linezolid, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazide (not run in the murine model) demonstrated bacteriostatic activity against clindamycin resistance-inducible isolates. This study demonstrates that clindamycin's activity against the iMLS(B) strains tested is partially impacted by inoculum size. At present, there are several alternatives that appear promising for treating clindamycin resistance-inducible strains of CA-MRSA.

In vitro selection and characterization of ceftobiprole-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics because it expresses penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), a low-affinity penicillin-binding protein. An investigational broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftobiprole (BPR), binds PBP2a with high affinity and is active against MRSA. We hypothesized that BPR resistance could be mediated by mutations in mecA, the gene encoding PBP2a. We selected BPR-resistant mutants by passage in high-volume broth cultures containing subinhibitory concentrations of BPR. We used strain COLnex (which lacks chromosomal mecA) transformed with pAW8 (a plasmid vector only), pYK20 (a plasmid carrying wild-type mecA), or pYK21 (a plasmid carrying a mutant mecA gene corresponding to five PBP2a mutations). All strains became resistant to BPR by day 9 of passaging, but MICs continued to increase until day 21. MICs increased 256-fold (from 1 to 256 microg/ml) for pAW8, 32-fold (from 4 to 128 microg/ml) for pYK20, and 8-fold (from 16 to 128 mug/ml) for pYK21. Strains carrying wild-type or mutant mecA developed six (pYK20 transformants) or four (pYK21 transformants) new mutations in mecA. The transformation of COLnex with a mecA mutant plasmid conferred BPR resistance, and the loss of mecA converted resistant strains into susceptible ones. Modeling studies predicted that several of the mecA mutations altered BPR binding; other mutations may have mediated resistance by influencing interactions with other proteins. Multiple mecA mutations were associated with BPR resistance in MRSA. BPR resistance also developed in the strain lacking mecA, suggesting a role for chromosomal genes.

Activities of daptomycin and comparative antimicrobials, singly and in combination, against extracellular and intracellular Staphylococcus aureus and its stable small-colony variant in human monocyte-derived macrophages and in broth

We investigated the antistaphylococcal activities of daptomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin against two Staphylococcus aureus strains and their stable small-colony variants, singly and in combination, in human monocyte-derived macrophages and in broth. Intracellularly, the three-drug combination and two-drug combinations with rifampin were most effective. Extracellularly, daptomycin, daptomycin plus gentamicin, gentamicin plus rifampin, and the three-drug combination had similar activities.

Telavancin: a novel lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, dosage, and place in therapy of telavancin are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent under development for use in the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections. Telavancin, like vancomycin, inhibits cell-wall biosynthesis by binding to late-stage cell-wall precursors. However, unlike vancomycin, telavancin also depolarizes the bacterial cell membrane and disrupts its functional integrity. Telavancin has concentration-dependent bactericidal activity and is active against gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic organisms. It is highly protein bound (93%) and has a volume of distribution of 115 mL/kg and a half-life of approximately eight hours. Telavancin is eliminated renally, and a dosage reduction is required in renally impaired patients. Animal models suggest that telavancin may be effective in the treatment of soft-tissue infections, bacteremia, endocarditis, meningitis, and pneumonia caused by gram-positive pathogens. Telavancin was not inferior to standard treatment for complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in two Phase II clinical trials and two Phase III clinical trials. A new drug application has been submitted for this indication, and Phase III trials to evaluate use in hospital-acquired-pneumonia, including infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), are planned. Adverse effects include metallic taste, nausea, vomiting, headache, foamy urine, Q-Tc-interval prolongation, hypokalemia, and serum creatinine increases. In trials evaluating telavancin for skin and soft-tissue infections, the dosage was 10 mg/kg i.v. once daily.

CONCLUSION

Telavancin is a promising new agent for gram-positive infections and may offer an alternative to vancomycin for MRSA-associated infections.

Daptomycin and tigecycline: a review of clinical efficacy in the antimicrobial era

There is a clinical need for new treatment options as a result of continued increase in the expression of resistance among bacterial pathogens. A number of compounds currently in development show promise. However, in some cases, there is concern that resistance may develop quickly to new compounds that are based on existing antimicrobial agents. Therefore, daptomycin, a novel lipopeptide with a unique mode of action, is of particular interest. It has rapid bactericidal activity against growing and stationary-phase bacteria, once-daily dosing regimen, and has a low potential for the development of resistance. It has been approved for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria, and registration for treatment of infective endocarditis and bacteraemia is anticipated. Daptomycin is a welcome addition to the antimicrobial armamentarium for the treatment of bacterial infections. Tigecycline is a new glycyclcycline antimicrobial recently approved for use in the USA, Europe and elsewhere. While related to the tetracyclines, tigecycline overcomes many of the mechanisms responsible for resistance to this class. It is a novel broad spectrum glycylcycline with good activity against Gram-positive, many Gram-negative, anaerobic, and some atypical pathogens that has been developed to address this need. It is efficacious in complicated skin and soft tissue infections and in intra-abdominal infections. This review aims to summarise the key clinical data of daptomycin and tigecycline which hold promise for widespread clinical use in the next decade.

Evaluation of endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus developing nonsusceptibility to daptomycin

We examined sequential methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a patient with mitral valve endocarditis recovered during persistent bacteremia on standard therapy and relapse after treatment with daptomycin. An isolate obtained after 5 days of antimicrobial therapy, but before exposure to daptomycin, showed subtle physiological changes in response to daptomycin, with significant regrowth in the daptomycin killing assay compared to the treatment-naive strain. Once daptomycin was started, the population became more heterogeneous and tested as nonsusceptible. These organisms were examined in a simulated-vegetation in vitro pharmacodynamic model, which confirmed progressive decreases in killing with daptomycin concentrations that simulate those attained in humans with 6-mg/kg of body weight daily dosing. Early surgical intervention or combination therapy or both might have prevented the loss of daptomycin susceptibility.

Outcome of vancomycin treatment in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Limited data on the clinical outcome of vancomycin treatment compared with that of beta-lactam treatment in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MSSA-B) are available. We used different and complementary approaches: (i) a retrospective cohort study using a propensity score to adjust for confounding by treatment assignment and (ii) a matched case-control study. Of all patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) in two university-affiliated hospitals over a 7-year period, 294 patients with MSSA-B were enrolled in the cohort study. The cases for the case-control study were defined as patients who received vancomycin treatment for MSSA-B; the controls, who were patients that received beta-lactam treatment for MSSA-B, were selected at a 1:2 (case:control) ratio according to the objective matching scoring system and the propensity score system. In the cohort study, SAB-related mortality in patients with vancomycin treatment (37%, 10/27) was significantly higher than that in those with beta-lactam treatment (18%, 47/267) (P = 0.02). In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that vancomycin treatment was associated with SAB-related mortality when independent predictors for SAB-related mortality and propensity score were considered (adjusted odds ratio of 3.3, 95% confidence interval of 1.2 to 9.5). In the case-control study using the objective matching scoring system and the propensity score system, SAB-related mortality in case patients was 37% (10/27) and in control patients 11% (6/54) (P < 0.01). Our data suggest that vancomycin is inferior to beta-lactam in the treatment of MSSA-B.

Infection of intravascular prostheses: how to treat other than surgery

Long-term antimicrobial therapy may be effective in some patients with intravascular prosthesis infection. However, this approach does not represent an alternative to surgery when this is feasible, but is merely the best opportunity for patients too ill to tolerate a re-intervention. Prosthetic valve endocarditis may be treated with antibiotic therapy alone in selected patients who are haemodynamically stable with non-staphylococcal infections and no para-valvular complications. In contrast, infections of pacemaker leads or other implantable cardiac devices require complete hardware removal, as infection recurrence always occurs, even after a seemingly effective initial treatment. Attempts to treat conservatively infections of abdominal aortic grafts can be successful in a few cases, provided the patient is stable, the pathogen has been identified, and antibiotic susceptibility has been demonstrated. Treatment requires at least 4-6 weeks and may be followed by a sequential oral regimen once the acute phase of the infection has subsided. The correct duration of this treatment is often unknown and relapses are common after treatment withdrawal. The availability of novel antibacterial and antifungal agents - showing fast microbicidal activity that includes biofilm micro-organisms - such as daptomycin and caspofungin, or having a wide antimicrobial spectrum, such as tigecycline, may increase the probability of long-standing suppression or even eradication of the infection in these particular subsets of inoperable patients. However, so far, very little experience is available on the efficacy and tolerability of these drugs in intravascular prosthesis infections. Controlled studies are lacking and difficult to plan. Well-designed prospective studies may help to establish guidelines and reach a multidisciplinary consensus on the optimal therapeutic approach, and are therefore awaited.

Clinical experience with daptomycin for the treatment of patients with osteomyelitis

Data from a registry were analyzed to describe the clinical experience with daptomycin (Cubicin; Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lexington, MA) for the treatment of patients with osteomyelitis. The Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience (CORE) 2004 database was used to identify patients treated for osteomyelitis. Posttherapy follow-up outcome assessments were collected for a subset of these patients. A total of 67 patients with osteomyelitis were clinically evaluable for outcome at the end of daptomycin therapy and had outcome assessed at a posttherapy visit. The median follow-up interval after the last dose of daptomycin was 76 days (range, 1 to 547 days). The median initial dose was 5.6 mg/kg (range, 3.2 to 7.5 mg/kg), and the median duration of therapy was 35 days (range, 3 to 546 days). Daptomycin was given concurrently with other antibiotics in 48% of cases. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (45%). Clinical outcomes at follow-up were cure, 42 (63%); improved, 13 (19%); failure, 7 (10%); and nonevaluable, 5 (7%). A total of 82% of patients with an orthopedic device (n = 17) were successfully treated, as were 88% of patients with concurrent bacteremia (n = 16). Failures were more likely if surgical debridement was not performed (24% vs. 5%; P = 0.045). The clinical success rate for patients treated with an initial daptomycin dose >4 mg/kg was significantly higher than for patients treated with an initial dose < or =4 mg/kg (88% vs. 65%; P = 0.013, chi2 test). Daptomycin had a 94% success rate when used alone with no follow-up antibiotics. The results indicate that daptomycin is being used in clinical practice to treat patients with osteomyelitis caused by gram-positive pathogens including MRSA. Prospective, controlled clinical trials of daptomycin are warranted that include rigorous data collection and long-term follow-up analysis.

New antimicrobial agents as therapy for resistant gram-positive cocci

Vancomycin- and methicillin-resistant gram-positive cocci have emerged as an increasingly problematic cause of hospital-acquired infections. We conducted a literature review of newer antibiotics with activity against vancomycin-resistant and methicillin-resistant gram-positive cocci. Quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline have in vitro activity for methicillin-resistant staphylococci and are superior to vancomycin for vancomycin-resistant isolates. Dalbavancin, telavancin, and oritavancin are new glycopeptides that have superior pharmacodynamic properties compared to vancomycin. We review the antibacterial spectrum, clinical indications and contraindications, pharmacologic properties, and adverse events associated with each of these agents. Daptomycin has rapid bactericidal activity for Staphylococcus aureus and is approved for use in bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis. Linezolid is comparable to vancomycin in patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) pneumonia and has pharmacoeconomic advantages given its oral formulation. Quinupristin/dalfopristin is the drug of choice for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections but has no activity against Enterococcus faecalis. Tigecycline has activity against both enterococcus species and MRSA; it is also active against Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes which allows for use in intra-abdominal and diabetic foot infections. A review of numerous in vitro and animal model studies shows that interaction between these newer agents and other antistaphylococcal agents for S. aureus are usually indifferent (additive).

Limitations of Vancomycin in the Management of Resistant Staphylococcal Infections

Vancomycin is effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and has been widely used in the past few years. However, several recent reports have highlighted the limitations of vancomycin, and its role in the management of serious infections is now being reconsidered. Vancomycin treatment failure rates are associated with an increase in the minimum inhibitory concentration as well as a decrease in the rate of bacterial killing. The intrinsic limitations of vancomycin also include poor tissue penetration, particularly in the lung; relatively slow bacterial killing; and the potential for toxicity. In addition, intermediate-level vancomycin resistance has emerged among staphylococci, as have rare cases of fully resistant strains. Because of these problems, when using vancomycin, it is probably prudent to carefully establish the diagnosis, test for antimicrobial susceptibility, and monitor serum trough concentrations to ensure adequate dosing.