Vancomycin resistance in staphylococci

Clonal diversity among streptogramin A-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in French hospitals

We analyzed 62 clinical isolates of streptogramin A-resistant (SGA(r)) Staphylococcus aureus collected between 1981 and 2001 in 14 hospitals located in seven French cities. These isolates, including five with decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides, were distributed into 45 antibiotypes and 38 SmaI genotypes. Each of these genotypes included between 1 and 11 isolates, the SmaI patterns of which differed by no more than three bands. Although numerous clones were identified, we observed the spread of monoclonal isolates either within the same hospital or within hospitals in distinct cities and at large time intervals. Hybridization with probes directed against 10 SGA(r) genes (vatA, vatB, vatC, vatD, vatE, vgaA, vgaB, vgaAv, vgbA, and vgbB) revealed six patterns: vgaAv (21 isolates), vatA-vgbA (24 isolates), vgaAv-vatB-vgaB (14 isolates), vgaAv-vatA-vgbA (1 isolate), vgaAv-vatA-vgbA-vatB-vgaB (1 isolate), and vgaA (1 isolate). We detected at least one SGA(r) determinant in all of the tested isolates. vgaAv, which is part of the recently characterized transposon Tn5406, was found in 59.7% of the tested isolates. Of the 16 streptogramin B-susceptible isolates, 14 carried vgaAv alone and were susceptible to the mixtures of streptogramins, whereas the 2 isolates carrying vgaAv-vatB-vgaB were resistant to these mixtures. vatA-vgbA was found on plasmids of the same apparent size in 26 (42%) of the tested clinical isolates from 18 unrelated SmaI genotypes. The possible dissemination of some of the multiple clones characterized in the present study with an expected increased selective pressure of streptogramins following the recent licensing of Synercid (quinupristin-dalfopristin) must be carefully monitored.

Linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, gram-positive infections: experience from a compassionate-use program

Linezolid was provided for treatment of multidrug-resistant, gram-positive infections through a compassionate-use program. Patients (n=796) received 600 mg of linezolid intravenously or orally every 12 h (828 treatment courses). Bacteremia was present in 46% of infections, endocarditis was present in 10.6%, and line-related infections were present in 31.1%. Other infections included intraabdominal infections (15.1%), complicated skin and skin-structure infections (13.3%), and osteomyelitis (10.7%). Causative pathogens included vancomycin-resistant enterococci (66.3%) and methicillin-resistant staphylococci (22.1%). Clinical intent-to-treat (ITT) outcomes in the evaluable population were as follows: cure, 73.3%; failure, 6.8%; and indeterminate, 19.9%. Microbiological ITT outcomes in evaluable patients were as follows: cure, 82.4%; failure, 14.1%; and indeterminate, 3.5%. At the test of cure assessment, the clinical cure and microbiological success rates were 91.5% and 85.8%, respectively. The most common adverse events possibly related to linezolid use were gastrointestinal disturbances (9.8% of cases), thrombocytopenia (7.4% of cases), decreased hemoglobin/hematocrit levels (4.1% of cases), and cutaneous reactions (4.0% of cases). Linezolid provided high rates of clinical cure and microbiological success in this complicated patient population, with very good overall tolerance.