Outcomes of a multicentre randomised clinical trial of etanercept to treat ankylosing spondylitis

A systematic MEDLINE analysis of therapeutic approaches in ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder involving the sacroiliac joints (SIJs), spine and less frequently the peripheral joints. Traditionally, it is well recognised that AS is a challenging disease to manage due to the lack of effective therapeutic options. Current evidence would suggest this has changed and there are now a number of therapies available that provide persistent control of inflammatory symptoms with improvement in daily function. NSAIDs remain the first step in patient treatment. Sulphasalazine may be effective in peripheral arthritis and there are emerging data to support its use in early inflammatory back pain. Studies have shown that pamidronate and steroid injection into SIJ have a symptom-modifying effect in AS. Current data suggest that anti-TNF treatment promises early benefit which is likely to continue in the longer term. Treatment with biologics should be considered sooner rather than later in the management of AS.

Etanercept in the longterm treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 2-year efficacy and safety of etanercept in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

A 96-week open-label extension study, which followed a 12-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial, was designed to provide longterm efficacy and safety data, including radiographic outcomes, for patients treated with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly (NCT00421980). In all, 81 patients were enrolled (96% of the participants from the double-blind study). Key efficacy measures included improvement using the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20% (ASAS20) criteria, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Radiographic progression was evaluated using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) method. Paired t tests were used to test within-group changes from baseline.

RESULTS

The percentage of responders, by ASAS20 criteria, remained relatively constant in patients who received etanercept during the 12-week double-blind study (60% at Week 0 and 83% at Week 96 of the open-label extension); more patients from the placebo group became responders after being switched to etanercept (23% and 74%, respectively). A similar trend was also observed using the ASAS40 and ASAS5/6 criteria, the BASFI, and the BASDAI. Most patients had no change from baseline in mSASSS values. Etanercept was well tolerated; the most frequent adverse events were injection site reactions (n=30; 37.0%) and headache (n=18; 22.2%), and the most frequent infections were upper respiratory tract infections (n=43; 53.1%) and flu syndrome (n=22; 27.2%).

CONCLUSION

For 2 years, etanercept was clinically effective and well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings.

Effectiveness, safety, and predictors of good clinical response in 1250 patients treated with adalimumab for active ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in a large cohort of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and identified clinical predictors of good clinical response.

METHODS

Patients with active AS [Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)>or=4] received adalimumab 40 mg every other week in addition to their standard antirheumatic therapies in a multinational 12-week, open-label study. We used 3 definitions of good clinical response: 50% improvement in the BASDAI (BASDAI=50), 40% improvement in the ASsessments of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS40), or ASAS partial remission. Response predictors were determined by logistic regression with backward elimination (selection level 5%).

RESULTS

Of 1250 patients, 1159 (92.7%) completed 12 weeks of adalimumab treatment. At Week 12, 57.2% of patients achieved BASDAI 50, 53.7% achieved ASAS40, and 27.7% achieved ASAS partial remission. Important predictors of good clinical response (BASDAI 50, ASAS40, and partial remission) were younger age (p<0.001), and greater C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (p<or=0.001), HLA-B27 positivity (p<or=0.01), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist naivety (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab was effective in this large cohort of patients with AS, with more than half of patients achieving a BASDAI 50 or ASAS40 response and more than a quarter of patients reaching partial remission at Week 12.Younger age, greater CRP concentrations, HLA-B27 positivity, and TNF antagonist naivety were strongly associated with BASDAI 50, ASAS40, and partial remission responses. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00478660.

Challenges in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis with etanercept

Biologic agents have been designed with the help of immunological studies to target particular areas of the immune system which are thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of disease. Etanercept is a soluble anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) agent licensed for the treatment of active poly-articular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in children aged 4 to 17 years who have failed to respond to methotrexate alone, or who have been intolerant of methotrexate. The safety and efficacy of etanercept in this patient group has been established by one randomized controlled trial and several longitudinal studies. This, together with the fact that until recently etanercept was the only anti-TNF licensed in JIA, has made it the most common first choice biologic for many clinicians. However, there are still many unanswered questions about etanercept, including its efficacy and safety in different subtypes of JIA, in children under 4 years of age and in those with uveitis. There are still concerns about the long term safety of TNF antagonists in the pediatric age group and unanswered questions about increased risks of malignancy and infection. Although adult studies are useful to improve understanding of these risks, they are not a substitute for good quality pediatric research and follow-up studies. Adult trials often include greater numbers of patients. However, they evaluate a different population and drug behavior may vary in children due to differences in metabolism, growth and impact on a developing immune system. In addition, rheumatoid arthritis is a different disease than JIA. Clinicians need to carefully weigh up the risk benefit ratio of anti-TNF use in children with JIA and push for robust clinical trials to address the questions that remain unanswered. This article summarizes the evidence available for use of etanercept in children with JIA and highlights aspects of treatment in need of further research.

Therapy of spondyloarthritides

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the major subtype and a major outcome of an interrelated group of rheumatic diseases now named as spondyloarthritides (SpA). The most important clinical features of this group are inflammatory back pain (IBP), asymmetric peripheral oligoarthritis, predominantly of the lower limbs, enthesitis and specific organ involvement such as anterior uveitis, psoriasis and chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Aortic root involvement and conduction abnormalities are rare complications ofAS. For clinical purposes, five subgroups are differentiated: AS, psoriatic SpA (PsSpA), reactive SpA (ReSpA), SpA associated with inflammatory bowel disease (SpAIBD) and undifferentiated SpA (uSpA). The SpA are genetically linked, the strongest known contributing factor is the MHC class I molecule HLA B27, ARTS-7, and IL-23R, others still remain to be identified. Most frequently and characteristically, AS starts in the sacroiliac joints at a mean age of26 years affecting men only slightly more frequent than women. In about 80% of the patients the disease spreads to the spine where all three segments are affected, most frequently the thoracic spine. Osteodestructive structural changes such as erosions occur less frequently than osteoproliferative changes which are pathognomonic for AS being clinically impressive by their appearance as syndesmophytes and ankylosis. Established classification criteria for AS and SpA perform less well in early disease stages. This partly contributes to the delay of diagnosis which is in the range of 5-10 years-mainly due the high frequency of back pain in the population. Major factors to improve the rate of AS patients diagnosed early are HLA B27 and imaging of the sacroiliac joints. International recommendations for the management ofAS have been published. The conventional treatment is mainly based on NSAIDs, patients with peripheral arthritis may be treated with sulfasalazine and patients with persistently active disease benefit from therapy with anti-TNF agents. Physiotherapy is of major importance in the general approach to patients with AS.

[Meta-analysis of efficacy of anti-TNF alpha therapy in ankylosing spondylitis patients]

INTRODUCTION

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) plays an important role in the pathology of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Therefore, anti-TNF antibody based therapies could hopefuly be a treatment in AS patients without response to current drugs, mainly non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the evidence from clinical trials on the efficacy of anti-TNF alpha for the treatment of AS by performing a meta-analysis to derive estimates of responses occurring in randomized trials employing anti-TNF therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library and electronic abstract databases of the annual scientific meetings of both the European League Against Rheumatism and the American College of Rheumatology was conducted through August 2006. To be selected, the studies had to fulfil all of the followings conditions: a) randomized controlled trial comparing one therapy anti-TNF alpha (infliximab, etanercept or adalimumab) versus placebo. Used between 6 and 24 weeks in patients with AS; b) diagnosis based on the New York modified criteria for AS; c) the primary end point had to be the proportion of patients with a 20% improvement response according to the criteria of the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group (ASAS20 responders).

RESULTS

Seven trials met our inclusion criteria and were selected for meta-analysis and were considered of high methodological quality with a total of 1,094 patients, 660 patients in treatment group and 434 patients in control-placebo group. In anti-TNF alpha treatment group, the ASAS20 response rate improvement was 60.4% and 22.1% in placebo group at 6-24 weeks period. The relative risk was 2.78 (95% CI, 2.3-3.4), favourable to treatment group. The number needed to treat was 3 (95% CI, 2-4).

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence of an increased relative benefit of improved clinical outcomes in patients with AS, treated with anti-TNF antibody therapy with two assessment criteria ASAS20 at short term (6 to 24 weeks) treatment periods; with an evidence level I and recommendation level A.

Safety and clinical responses in ankylosing spondylitis after three months of etanercept therapy

We aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical responses in Korean ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients after three months of etanercept therapy. AS patients satisfying the Modified New York Criteria were enrolled. They were assessed for safety and clinical responses at enrollment and after three months of etanercept therapy. A total of 124 patients completed the study. After three months, the rate of ASsessment in AS International Working Group 20% improvement (ASAS 20) response was 79.8%. The rates of ASAS 40 and ASAS 5/6 responses were 58.5 and 62.8%, respectively. Significant improvement of Korean version of Bath AS Disease Activity Index (KBASDAI) (p<0.0001), Bath AS Functional Activity Index (BASFI) (p<0.0001), and Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) (p=0.0009) were achieved after three months. Quality of life was also significantly improved after three months, as demonstrated by scores for SF-36 (p<0.0001) and EQ-5D (p<0.0001). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were significantly decreased (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, respectively). None of the patients developed tuberculosis and there were no serious adverse event. AS patients with inadequate response to conventional therapy showed significant clinical improvement without serious adverse events after three months of etanercept therapy.

Adalimumab effectiveness for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis is maintained for up to 2 years: long-term results from the ATLAS trial

Objective:

To determine the long-term effect of adalimumab on patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who participated in the Adalimumab Trial Evaluating Long-Term Efficacy and Safety in AS (ATLAS), a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, 24-week trial.

Methods:

Patients received adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow) or placebo for 24 weeks in ATLAS. At week 24, patients were switched to open-label adalimumab 40 mg eow. Efficacy measures included 20% improvement in the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria (ASAS20), ASAS40 and ASAS partial remission responses and changes in individual components of the ASAS20 response evaluations, for example, Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) and Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Two-year interim data were analysed based on the total duration of adalimumab exposure, irrespective of the treatment randomisation group.

Results:

At 2 years, 255 (82.0%) of the original 311 ATLAS patients continued receiving adalimumab treatment. Improvements in ASAS responses observed in ATLAS were sustained during long-term treatment; 64.5% (200/310) were ASAS20 responders, 50.6% (157/310) were ASAS40 responders and 33.5% (104/310) had maintained ASAS-defined partial remission. Changes in individual ASAS response components were sustained or improved during long-term adalimumab treatment. From ATLAS baseline to 2 years of adalimumab exposure, respectively, BASDAI improved from 6.3 (SD 1.7) to 2.4 (SD 2.3) and BASFI improved from 5.2 (SD 2.4) to 2.9 (SD 2.5). Adalimumab was well tolerated. No cases of tuberculosis, congestive heart failure, lupus-like symptoms, or demyelinating disease were reported.

Conclusions:

Adalimumab reduced the signs and symptoms of AS and induced partial remission for up to 2 years. The long-term safety profile was similar to the short-term safety profile.

Trial registration information:

NCT00085644

Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with etanercept: an exploratory, placebo-controlled trial

RATIONALE

An efficacious medical therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains elusive.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the efficacy and safety of etanercept in the treatment of IPF.

METHODS

This was a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter exploratory trial in subjects with clinically progressive IPF. Primary endpoints included changes in the percentage of predicted FVC and lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide corrected for hemoglobin (Dl(CO(Hb))) and change in the alveolar to arterial oxygen pressure difference P(a-a)(O(2)) at rest from baseline over 48 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-eight subjects received subcutaneous etanercept (25 mg) or placebo twice weekly as their sole treatment for IPF. No differences in baseline demographics and disease status were detected between treatment groups; the mean time from first diagnosis was 13.6 months and mean FVC was 63.9% of predicted. At 48 weeks, no significant differences in efficacy endpoints were observed between the groups. A nonsignificant reduction in disease progression was seen in several physiologic, functional, and quality-of-life endpoints among subjects receiving etanercept. There was no difference in adverse events between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this exploratory study in patients with clinically progressive IPF, etanercept was well tolerated. Although there were no differences in the predefined endpoints, a decreased rate of disease progression was observed on several measures. Further evaluation of TNF antagonists in the treatment of IPF may be warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00063869).

Update on the use of etanercept across a spectrum of rheumatoid disorders

Etanercept is a soluble TNF receptor p75 fusion protein which is approved for subcutaneous use (50 mg weekly) in the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile RA, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. Etanercept binds to both TNFα and lymphotoxin and has quite a short mean half-life (70 hours). Numerous randomized clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy to improve signs and symptoms in early and established RA and other inflammatory arthritis. Furthermore, etanercept has shown its ability to prevent radiographic progression and to improve health-related quality of life in patients with RA and psoriatic arthritis. A combination of etanercept plus methotrexate was more efficacious than etanercept monotherapy in RA patients but there is currently no evidence that such rheumatic combination is better than monotherapy in other disorders. Etanercept was generally well tolerated both in controlled trials with withdrawal rates being similar to the comparator groups and in large observational studies. Infections and injection-site reactions were the most frequently reported events. Serious infections were slightly increased but the occurrence of tuberculosis seemed less frequent than with anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (infliximab and adalimumab). The benefit-risk ratio of etanercept appeared to be very positive, and this drug has now emerged as a major therapy in patients with active inflammatory arthritis. Furthermore, it is more frequently considered as an emerging and valuable option in patients with early disease.

Biological therapies for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Lessons from the adult and pediatric experiences

Biologics have advanced the therapy of adult and pediatric arthritis. They have been linked to rare serious adverse outcomes, but the actual risk of these events is controversial in adults, and largely unknown in pediatrics. Because of the paucity of safety and efficacy data in children, pediatric rheumatologists often rely on the adult literature. Herein, we reviewed the adult and pediatric literature on five classes of medicines: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, anakinra, rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab. For efficacy, we reviewed randomized controlled studies in adults, but did include lesser qualities of evidence for pediatrics. For safety, we utilized prospective and retrospective studies, rarely including reports from other inflammatory conditions. The review included studies on rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, as well as juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Overall, we found that the TNF inhibitors have generally been found safe and effective in adult and pediatric use, although risks of infections and other adverse events are discussed. Anakinra, rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab have also shown positive results in adult trials, but there is minimal pediatric data published with the exception of small studies involving the subgroup of children with systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, in whom anakinra and tocilizumab may be effective therapies.

Most tumour necrosis factor inhibitor trials in rheumatology are undeservedly called 'efficacy and safety' trials: a survey of power considerations

OBJECTIVES

Many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are labelled efficacy and safety while due consideration for power is provided only for efficacy outcomes. This in turn necessitates a discussion of the inadequacy of sample size (type II error) for identifying harm. This is particularly important in RCTs of TNF inhibitors as harm related to these agents is still a matter of debate.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for all RCTs published examining TNF inhibitors in RA, PsA and AS. Only original study reports were surveyed for whether: (i) they were labelled as efficacy, safety or both; (ii) the methods sections included safety as a primary or secondary end point; (iii) power calculations were adequately explained; (iv) statistical tests of significance were given for harm; and finally (v) any discussion of type II error for harm was present.

RESULTS

Of the 34 articles surveyed, 24 (71%) were labelled as efficacy and safety. Among these, 23 (96%) did not include safety as a formal primary or secondary end point. In only 2/24 (8%) power calculations were given for safety. Finally, in only 3/22 (14%) any discussion about the inadequate sample size (type II error) for detecting harm could be found.

CONCLUSIONS

Most reports of RCTs of TNF inhibitors in rheumatological diseases are inappropriately labelled as addressing efficacy and safety. Their lack of power in detecting harm is not adequately discussed, either.

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the most common form of spondyloarthropathy. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications and exercise are used to manage the chronic inflammatory spinal pain and stiffness. Up to 20% of patients have a peripheral inflammatory arthritis, which is treated with standard disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs especially sulfasalazine and methotrexate. Patients may also have extra-articular manifestations, such as anterior uveitis, psoriasiform skin lesions and inflammatory bowel disease. Anti-tumour necrosis (TNF) therapy has been used with great success in rheumatoid arthritis. There are now good data of the efficacy of anti-TNF therapies in the short and medium terms in AS. Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab have been shown in randomized placebo-controlled trials of short duration to significantly reduce disease activity, including pain and stiffness as well as improving function, spinal movement and quality of life. It is hoped that long-term therapy will prevent radiologic progression and ankylosis and studies of long-term efficacy are awaited. Anti-TNF therapies are generally well tolerated in AS. It is important to screen for latent tuberculosis before the commencement of anti-TNF therapy. The side-effect profile of anti-TNF therapies in AS does not appear different from that in rheumatoid arthritis. Currently, treatment with anti-TNF therapy in AS is indicated in established disease with radiographic damage. There is evidence that response to therapy is greater in patients with earlier disease and less damage. Future developments may see this therapy extended to patients with pre-radiographic AS.

Infliximab in severe active ankylosing spondylitis with spinal ankylosis

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is an anti-tumour necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, which significantly improves pain, stiffness and functional disability outcomes in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. There are limited data available on the efficacy of this treatment for the subgroup with established spinal ankylosis.

AIM

To compare the treatment response of infliximab in active severe ankylosing spondylitis for patients with and without radiographic evidence of spinal ankylosis in the clinical practice setting.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index of 8.7, all HLA-B27 positive, with 11 (41%) having spinal ankylosis, were studied for 54 weeks. The qualification for initial and ongoing infliximab treatment was defined by the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefit Schedule (PBS), and 5 mg/kg of infliximab was given at 0 week (baseline), repeated at 2 and 6 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter. At each time point, PBS-mandated and international consensus response measures were completed. Disease activity and outcome measures for spinal ankylosis subgroup and those who did not have spinal ankylosis were cross-sectionally compared at baseline and 1 year.

RESULTS

Patients with spinal ankylosis tended to be older (P = 0.01). Although the subgroup with spinal ankylosis had higher baseline activity scores, the only significant difference between the subgroups was the degree of morning stiffness (P = 0.04). By 54 weeks, all patients including the subgroup with spinal ankylosis fulfilled the PBS criteria for continuation of treatment. Majority of patients including the subgroup with spinal ankylosis achieved the various international consensus response measures. Patients with spinal ankylosis also experienced significant improvements in health-related quality of life, with majority returning to full-time employment by 1 year.

CONCLUSION

In real-life clinical practice, patients with established disease with spinal ankylosis and high levels of inflammation and disease activity can achieve a major clinical response with infliximab.

Advances in the diagnosis and immunotherapy for ocular inflammatory disease

Significant advances in the diagnosis and therapy for uveitis have been made to improve the quality of care for patients with ocular inflammatory diseases. While traditional ophthalmic examination techniques, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography continue to play a major role in the evaluation of patients with uveitis, the advent of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence into clinical practice provides additional information about disease processes. Polymerase chain reaction and cytokine diagnostics have also continued to play a greater role in the evaluation of patients with inflammatory diseases. The biologic agents, a group of medications that targets cytokines and other soluble mediators of inflammation, have demonstrated promise in targeted immunotherapy for specific uveitic entities. Their ophthalmic indications have continued to expand, improving the therapeutic armentarium of uveitis specialists.

Etanercept: a review of its use in the management of ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis

Etanercept (Enbrel), a recombinant, dimeric, soluble tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor protein, is approved in various countries for the treatment of adult patients with ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis. Monotherapy with subcutaneous etanercept 25mg twice weekly or 50mg once weekly was effective and generally well tolerated in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis participating in several large, well designed clinical studies. Treatment with etanercept was more effective than placebo in reducing disease activity and improving health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in both patient populations, and in delaying structural disease progression in patients with psoriatic arthritis. The beneficial response to etanercept achieved with shorter-term treatment was sustained in studies of up to 4 years' total duration. Randomised, well designed, head-to-head comparisons, including pharmacoeconomic analyses, with other anti-TNF biological modulators are required to accurately position etanercept and fully establish its cost effectiveness. In the meantime, etanercept is a valuable treatment option for patients with ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis who are suitable candidates for therapy.

Nonsurgical management of ankylosing spondylitis

Object

The aim of this study was to review the current evidence-based nonsurgical management strategies of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) for spine surgeons. Whereas surgical management is indicated in a highly selected group, nonsurgical management is itself a useful measure for nearly all patients with AS.

Methods

The authors conducted a literature review of PubMed using relevant search words. All the articles published in English in the last 15 years were reviewed and the level of evidence provided by them was noted.

Results

Nonpharmacological treatments in the form of physical therapy and patient education have Level Ib evidence in maintaining function in AS. There is Level Ib evidence supporting the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and coxibs for treatment in patients with symptoms. There is not enough evidence to support the use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatoid arthritis drugs. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α inhibitors (infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab) are associated with Level Ib evidence in improving spinal pain, function, inflammatory biomarkers, and spinal inflammation detected by magnetic resonance imaging in patients in whom symptom duration has exceeded 3 months.

Conclusions

Physical therapy and patient education are useful for all patients diagnosed with AS. If symptomatic, patients are started with either a course of nonselective NSAIDs or a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. The role of NSAIDs as a disease-modifying therapy in the treatment of AS is increasingly being understood. The central role of TNF in the pathogenesis of AS is now known, and the advent of biological treatment in the form of anti–TNFα factors has revolutionized the medical management of AS and is used in patients with axial disease whose symptoms persist despite an adequate dose of NSAIDs.

Tumor necrosis factor as a therapeutic target of rheumatologic disease

TNF-alpha is a crucial pro-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokine that is central to the pathogenesis of various inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. A number of controlled trials have shown effectiveness for TNF-alpha inhibitors in several diseases, in particular rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and Crohn's disease. These agents may also be useful in additional autoimmune conditions. The introduction of TNF-alpha inhibitors has revolutionized the therapeutic approach and treatment paradigms especially for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Despite extensive investigation, the full profile of their mechanisms of action remain incompletely understood. Optimal use of these agents requires consideration of their possible adverse effects. In addition to the presently available TNF-alpha blockers, other agents targeting this key mediator are under study. Recent advances and future directions in anti-TNF-alpha therapy are discussed in this paper.

TNFalpha blockade in human diseases: an overview of efficacy and safety

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) antagonists including antibodies and soluble receptors have shown remarkable efficacy in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). As experience with these agents has matured, there is an emerging need to integrate and critically assess the utility of these agents across disease states and clinical sub-specialties. Their remarkable efficacy in reducing chronic damage in Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis has led many investigators to propose a new, 'top down' paradigm for treating patients initially with aggressive regimens to quickly control disease. Intriguingly, in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, anti-TNFalpha agents appear to more profoundly benefit patients with more chronic stages of disease but have a relatively weaker or little effect in early disease. While the spectrum of therapeutic efficacy of TNFalpha antagonists widens to include diseases such as recalcitrant uveitis and vasculitis, these agents have failed or even exacerbated diseases such as heart failure and multiple sclerosis. Increasing use of these agents has also led to recognition of new toxicities as well as to understanding of their excellent long-term tolerability. Disconcertingly, new cases of active tuberculosis still occur in patients treated with all TNFalpha antagonists due to lack of compliance with recommendations to prevent reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection. These safety issues as well as guidelines to prevent treatment-associated complications are reviewed in detail in this article. New data on mechanisms of action and development of newer TNFalpha antagonists are discussed in a subsequent article in the Journal. It is hoped that these two review articles will stimulate a fresh assessment of the priorities for research and clinical innovation to improve and extend therapeutic use and safety of TNFalpha antagonism.

Occupational therapy in ankylosing spondylitis: Short-term prospective study in patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha drugs

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of occupational therapy (OT) on functional status in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha drugs in a short-term open controlled prospective study.

METHODS

Twenty-seven AS subjects treated with anti-TNF-alpha drugs, were allocated to OT (n=14) or control (n=13) group. At the study entry and at the 16th week we evaluated the following outcome parameters including BASFI, BASDAI, BASMI, Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), pain, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein CRP) and the adherence reported using self management methods, related to joint protection and energy conservation.

RESULTS

At baseline, OT and control group had similar demographic and clinical features. After 16 weeks, we found that the changes from baseline of BASFI (p<0.05), BASDAI (p<0.02), SF-36 CMS (p<0.02) and pain (p<0.02) score improved more significantly in OT group than in control group, where the scores remained invariable. After 16 weeks from baseline, the OT group reported a significantly more frequent use of self management methods, related to joint protection and energy conservation, than the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our controlled study indicates that a combination treatment with anti-TNFalpha agents and OT was beneficial for patients with AS, with synergistic effects on pain, function and disability. Thus OT intervention could be also considered when the disease is stable and well controlled with drugs because it may represent a further tool to improve the health status of patients.

Etanercept: long-term clinical experience in rheumatoid arthritis and other arthritis

Etanercept is a dimeric fusion protein based on the p75 TNF-alpha receptor. It binds to TNF-alpha and blocks its biologic activity. In randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, etanercept has therapeutic activity in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Etanercept improves joint inflammation, physical function and slows/halts structural damage, especially when combined with methotrexate. A sustained response is observed in a substantial percentage of patients. Although some safety issues should be considered before starting etanercept treatment, in general terms, etanercept is a well tolerated drug with an acceptable safety profile. The use of any TNF-alpha antagonist must be in agreement with the National Recommendations for Biologic Therapy, and in difficult clinical situations, a balance between risk/benefit needs to be obtained.

Differences in the incidence of flares or new onset of inflammatory bowel diseases in patients with ankylosing spondylitis exposed to therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents

OBJECTIVE

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are clinically and pathologically linked. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents are efficacious in treating AS, but not all are equally effective in treating IBD (Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]). The purpose our study was to analyze the incidence of flares and new onset of IBD in patients with AS treated with anti-TNF agents.

METHODS

Data from 9 trials, 7 placebo-controlled trials and 2 open studies, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data were available on 419 AS patients exposed to etanercept (625 patient-years), 366 exposed to infliximab (618 patient-years), 295 exposed to adalimumab (132 patient-years), and 434 placebo patients (150 patient-years). A history of IBD was reported in 76 of 1,130 patients (6.7%). There were 2 reports of IBD while receiving placebo (1.3 per 100 patient-years), 1 while receiving infliximab, and 3 while receiving adalimumab. Among the 14 IBD cases receiving etanercept (2.2 per 100 patient-years) there were 8 CD and 6 UC cases, significantly different from infliximab (P = 0.01) but not from placebo. Patients with a history of IBD had an IBD flare odds ratio of 18.0 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2-154) while taking etanercept and 4.2 (95% CI 0.4-44) while taking adalimumab, in comparison with infliximab. The incidence rates of new onset of IBD showed no significant difference between etanercept (0.8 per 100 patient-years) and placebo (0.5 per 100 patient-years).

CONCLUSION

New onset and flare of IBD are infrequent events in AS patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. Infliximab (but not etanercept) largely prevents IBD activity. More data are required for adalimumab. The incidence of new onset of IBD was statistically not different from placebo for all anti-TNF agents.

New therapeutic approaches for spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists are effective for signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis. Recent studies have evaluated the efficacy of these agents for structural disease modification. We critically review recent radiographic data suggesting that tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition may have structure-modifying effects in ankylosing spondylitis, and may thereby alter the disease course.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies employing MRI suggest that therapy with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists significantly reduces spinal inflammation in active ankylosing spondylitis when compared to placebo; there was no comparable improvement in the severity of chronic stigmata, such as syndesmyophytes and vertebral bridging. These studies were of relatively short duration and small size.

SUMMARY

Despite insufficient evidence to conclude definitively that tumor necrosis factor alpha-antagonist therapy provides durable and effective structure modification in ankylosing spondylitis, the data strongly suggest a benefit, at least in the short term. In the future, MRI data coupled with clinical outcomes in larger cohorts followed for longer durations may result in a paradigm shift for ankylosing spondylitis treatment similar to that undergone for rheumatoid arthritis, where patients with ankylosing spondylitis are offered therapy early in the disease course to arrest and prevent structural disease progression.

Ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis is a common inflammatory rheumatic disease that affects the axial skeleton, causing characteristic inflammatory back pain, which can lead to structural and functional impairments and a decrease in quality of life. New imaging techniques and therapies have substantially changed the management of this disease in the past decade. Whether inhibition of radiographic progression and structural damage can be reached with available drugs is as yet unclear. Furthermore, treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and physiotherapy remains an important approach to long-term management of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. The new treatment options with tumour necrosis factor blockers seems a breakthrough for patients refractory to conventional treatment.

Adalimumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic inflammatory disease, with a prevalence of approximately 0.5%, which starts in the third decade of life. Treatment was, until recently, limited. Conventional disease-modifying drugs are not effective for the spinal manifestations, and NSAIDs and physical therapy were the standard treatment, without any other options for patients who did not respond to this treatment. Therefore, the high efficacy of the new group of TNF-blockers for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis represents a breakthrough for NSAID-refractory patients. Following the introduction of the two TNF-blockers, infliximab and etanercept, the fully humanized, anti-TNF monoclonal antibody adalimumab is now the third product that has been approved for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Adalimumab is given subcutaneously every 2 weeks at a dose of 40 mg. In open and placebo-controlled trials, the drug was shown to be safe and effective in ankylosing spondylitis patients. Long-term treatment data of up to 2 years are now available, confirming efficacy and acceptable safety.

Biological therapy of arthritis and systemic autoimmune diseases

A biológiai terápia lényege, hogy a gyulladás egyetlen, jól meghatározott pontján (pl. egy adott citokin szintjén) hat. Ezáltal a sokszor igen bonyolult mechanizmusokból álló patogenetikai hálózatot egy adott ponton szakítja meg. Ma a rheumatoid arthritis a biológiai terápia szempontjából modellbetegség, mivel a legtöbb szerrel ebben a kórképben próbálkoztak. Ezt követően egyéb arthritisekben (pl. spondylitis ankylopoetica, psoriasisos arthropathia), majd egyes szisztémás autoimmun kórképekben (pl. szisztémás lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, myositisek, vasculitisek, Sjögren-szindróma stb.) kezdték el alkalmazni. A legtöbb kórkép esetében egy központi szereppel bíró citokin, a tumornekrózis faktor-α (TNF-α) gátlószerei állnak a terápia középpontjában. Azonban a biológiai terápia megtervezésekor az adott kórkép patogenezisét (pl. döntően Th1 vagy Th2 jellegét) figyelembe kell venni. Nem véletlen, hogy amíg egyes kórképekben (pl. rheumatoid arthritis, spondylitis ankylopoetica, psoriasis, polymyositis, polyarticularis juvenilis arthritis) döntően a TNF-blokkolók és a T-sejtek elleni gátlás vált be, addig másoknál (pl. lupus, Sjögren-szindróma, dermatomyositis) a B-sejt elleni terápia kecsegtet sikerrel. Ezen összefoglalóban a szerzők áttekintik az arthritisek és szisztémás autoimmun kórképek biológiai terápiájára vonatkozó legfontosabb adatokat. Kitérnek az alkalmazott szerek tulajdonságaira, a hatékonyság és biztonságosság kérdéseire egyaránt.

Anti-TNF therapy in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: the Finnish experience

Biological therapy for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has led to improved disease control beyond that of conventional treatments. International recommendations encourage clinicians prescribing biological treatments to register patients in national registers to collect information on outcome and toxicity. Patients with AS (n = 229) from the Register of Biological Treatment in Finland (ROB-FIN) with severe disease of long duration were followed-up for up to 24 months. Due to an active disease, one or more concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were used by 86% at commencement of biological therapy. This add-on strategy with infliximab led to a rapid pain relief and improvement of patient's and physician's global assessments, C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and swollen and tender joint counts within 6 weeks. Concomitant use of NSAID and oral corticosteroid was reduced. Corresponding results were documented at 3 months with etanercept, which was more recently approved for the treatment of spondyloarthropathies. Seventy-nine percent of the patients were ASAS 20 responders. A subgroup of AS patients with only axial involvement (n = 46) responded correspondingly. The first biological drug was discontinued in only 7% due to lack of efficacy and in 6% due to adverse events. Anti-TNF agents, often used in combination with DMARDs, appeared to have persistent effectiveness and limited toxicity in a real-life clinical setting in a cohort of Finnish AS patients with severe disease and long disease duration.

Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: focus on etanercept

Ankylosing spondylitis is a chronic inflammatory condition which preferentially affects the axial skeleton, often beginning in the sacroiliac joints. The etiology of the pathologic lesions of this condition including enthesitis, erosive articular changes, osteitis, and fibrous ankylosis, as well as changes which occur in the eye, gastrointestinal tract, cardiovascular system, and lungs is unknown; however, there is a strong association with HLA-B27, which indicates altered immunity. One of the major mediators of the immune response is TNF-alpha, which functions as a pleiotrophic soluble messenger primarily from macrophages. TNF-alpha is principally involved with activation of both normal and transformed cells, including endothelium, synoviocytes, osteoclasts, chondrocytes, and fibroblasts. The cornerstone of medical management of ankylosing spondylitis includes intensive physical therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories for symptomatic relief. However, it is becoming increasingly recognized that TNF-alpha blockade has an important role in the reduction of spine and joint inflammation. This review discusses the data that supports use of etanercept in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale is valid in patients with psoriatic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is an important symptom in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

AIM

To determine the reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT fatigue) Scale in PsA.

METHODS

Consecutive patients attending the PsA clinic were assessed with the FACIT fatigue Scale twice, 1 week apart. Patients were assessed clinically according to a standardised PsA clinic protocol. Internal consistency of the 13 items on the FACIT fatigue questionnaire was measured using Cronbach's alpha; test-retest reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and validity by the correlation of the FACIT fatigue results with other fatigue measures and disease characteristics.

RESULTS

135 patients (80 men and 55 women, mean (SD) age 52 (13) years, mean (SD) disease duration 17 (10) years) participated. The mean FACIT fatigue score was 35.8 (12.4). Cronbach's alpha was 0.96. Repeat questionnaires were returned by 54% of patients. No difference in disease characteristics was observed between those who did and did not return the questionnaires. The ICC for first and repeat FACIT fatigue scores was 0.95. The correlation between the FACIT fatigue and modified Fatigue Severity Score was -0.79 (95% CI -0.85 to -0.72). FACIT fatigue scores were lower in patients with overwhelming fatigue and fibromyalgia than in those without (p<0.001). The FACIT fatigue was correlated with the actively inflamed joint count (-0.43, 95% CI -0.56 to -0.28, p<0.001), but not with the clinically damaged joint count (-0.06, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.11, p = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

The FACIT fatigue results were reproducible, and correlated with other fatigue measures as well as with disease activity in patients with PsA. Therefore, the FACIT fatigue is a reliable and valid instrument to measure fatigue in PsA.

Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Contemporary Perspective on Diagnosis and Treatment

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, great progress has been made in the development of diagnostic tools, therapeutic approaches, and validated outcome measures in the understanding of the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The purpose of this review was to summarize these developments.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search for the period 1978 to 2005, using the keyword, "ankylosing spondylitis," resulting in a total of 4878 publications, including 778 reviews. Articles were then selected based on their discussion of recent diagnostic tools and new treatment approaches in the pathogenesis of AS, leading to a final total of 104 articles.

RESULTS

In recent years, there have been 2 major developments in the management of AS that make earlier diagnosis possible and offer the hope of alleviating pain and preventing structural changes that result in loss of function. These developments include the use of magnetic resonance imaging to visualize the inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joint and the axial spine, and the demonstration that tumor necrosis factor blocking agents are highly efficacious in reducing spinal inflammation and possibly in slowing radiographic progression.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been major advances in both the diagnostic tools and the therapeutic regimens available for patients with AS.

A review of work-participation, cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness studies in ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) can have important socioeconomic consequences for individual patients and for society, as symptoms usually appear in the third decade of life. When compared with those of the general population, employment rates for AS patients are significantly decreased in men, but not in women; however, both sexes experience increased AS-related (partial) work disability. In addition, changes in type of work, working hours, and the need for help might be required. AS-related sick leave in patients in paid work varies between 6.5 and 18 days per patient per year. Between 15% and 20% of AS patients require help from relatives or friends to complete unpaid tasks. The majority of the direct health-care costs related to AS are incurred by hospitalizations, physiotherapy, informal care, and drugs. High disease activity and poor physical function are the most important factors associated with the total costs of AS. Cost-effectiveness analyses for different AS therapies have shown variable results. The use of different methodologic approaches to assess the cost-effectiveness ratios makes the findings of such analyses difficult to compare with each other. This article examines the effect of AS on work participation, costs of illness and reviews cost-effectiveness analyses of AS treatments.

Update on anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in the spondyloarthropathies including psoriatic arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The introduction of the macromolecule tumor necrosis factor inhibitors etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab has proven very successful for patients with spondyloarthropathies. The greatest experience has accrued in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. This paper reviews data from clinical trials with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has not only resulted in substantial improvement in the signs and symptoms of arthritis but has also improved functional status and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. Improvements in associated inflammatory features, such as enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis and uveitis in ankylosing spondylitis, have also been observed. Moreover, treatment has been shown to inhibit the progression of radiographic joint damage in psoriatic arthritis and to attenuate spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis. The notable success of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has not only changed the treatment paradigms for these conditions but has also stimulated studies aimed at improving diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and other aspects of clinical care.

SUMMARY

The introduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis has had a tremendous impact on daily clinical care.

Ankylosing spondylitis: new treatment modalities

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic and progressive inflammatory arthropathy that affects young adults. It is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and can have a devastating effect on quality of life. Conventional therapeutic regimes have traditionally been insufficient to control symptoms and signs of disease, and have failed to halt disease progression. However, the outlook of AS has changed with the advent of biological agents that block pivotal inflammatory cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor-alpha. Ongoing research has proven these agents to be efficacious and safe in the short and medium term. Further, longer-term trials are awaited to address the issue of whether these therapies are true disease modifiers in AS.

Outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis: what makes the assessment of treatment effects in ankylosing spondylitis different?

There are four major challenges in the assessment of outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) that are particularly relevant to the evaluation of new therapies. Firstly, measures of symptoms and impairment in AS are not specific for inflammatory processes, they also capture mechanical symptoms and fixed limitations. The non-specific nature of these measures may cause them to be less responsive and therefore less useful in determining treatment efficacy. Secondly, acute phase reactants have limited value as measures of AS activity and other surrogate markers have not yet been established. Thirdly, the assessment of the disease modifying potential of new therapies is hampered by the slow rate of spinal fusion. Fourthly, work disability has not be studied as an endpoint in clinical trials in AS, despite the fact that work disability is an important outcome in patients with AS. Research into ways to overcome these challenges in outcome measurement will help identify useful therapies and define the range of outcomes that they influence.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adalimumab, a fully human recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody that specifically targets human tumor necrosis factor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized (2:1 ratio), double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate a subcutaneous injection of adalimumab, 40 mg every other week, compared with placebo for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a 20% response according to the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group criteria for improvement (ASAS20) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included the ASAS20 at week 24 and multiple measures of disease activity, spinal mobility, and function, as well as ASAS partial remission.

RESULTS

At week 12, 58.2% of adalimumab-treated patients (121 of 208) achieved an ASAS20 response, compared with 20.6% of placebo-treated patients (22 of 107) (P < 0.001). More patients in the adalimumab group (45.2% [94 of 208]) than in the placebo group (15.9% [17 of 107]) had at least a 50% improvement in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index at week 12 (P < 0.001). Significant improvements in the ASAS40 response and the response according to the ASAS5/6 criteria at weeks 12 and 24 were also demonstrated (P < 0.001). Partial remission was achieved by more adalimumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients (22.1% versus 5.6%; P < 0.001). Adalimumab-treated patients reported more adverse events (75.0% versus 59.8% of placebo-treated patients; P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infections. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab was well-tolerated during the 24-week study period and was associated with a significant and sustained reduction in the signs and symptoms of active AS.

Etanercept 50 mg once weekly is as effective as 25 mg twice weekly in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of etanercept 50 mg once weekly with 25 mg twice weekly and placebo in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

METHODS

A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the effects of etanercept 50 mg once weekly, etanercept 25 mg twice weekly and placebo in 356 patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (3:3:1 randomisation, respectively). The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a response at week 12 based on the Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis Working Group criteria (ASAS 20). The pharmacokinetics of etanercept 50 mg once weekly and 25 mg twice weekly were analysed.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and disease activity were similar among the three groups: etanercept 50 mg once weekly, etanercept 25 mg twice weekly and placebo. The percentage of patients discontinuing therapy was 9.0%, 9.3% and 13.7% for the three respective groups. ASAS 20 response at 12 weeks was achieved by 74.2% of patients with etanercept 50 mg once weekly and 71.3% of those with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly, both significantly higher than the percentage of patients taking placebo (37.3%, p<0.001). Percentages of patients with ASAS 5/6 response (70.3%, 72.0% and 27.5%, respectively; p<0.001) and those with ASAS 40 response (58.1%, 53.3% and 21.6%, respectively; p<0.001) followed a similar pattern. Significant improvement (p<0.05) was seen in measures of disease activity, back pain, morning stiffness and C reactive protein levels as early as 2 weeks. Serum etanercept exposure was similar between the etanercept groups. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, including infections, was similar among all three groups, and no unexpected safety issues were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ankylosing spondylitis can expect a comparable significant improvement in clinical outcomes with similar safety when treated with etanercept 50 mg once weekly or with 25 mg twice weekly.

Developments and current pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for ankylosing spondylitis

The introduction of anti-TNFalpha therapy into the field of rheumatology has led to dramatic improvements in patient care, perhaps the most remarkable being in the management of ankylosing spondylitis. As experience with these compounds grows, their place in therapeutic strategy is becoming clearer, and it has been possible to develop evidence- and expertise-based recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis to aid the clinician in patient care. This review outlines treatment advances in ankylosing spondylitis, including the use of anti-TNFalpha agents, and how these have been incorporated into clinical recommendations for daily use.

A survey of inclusion of the time element when reporting adverse effects in randomised controlled trials of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The adequacy of reporting the time element in adverse effects in articles on randomised clinical trials of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha antagonists was surveyed.

METHODS

Prominent rheumatology and general/internal medicine journals were searched for all randomised controlled trials published about cyclo-oxygenase-2 and TNFalpha inhibitor use in rheumatological diseases up to November 2005. Reporting of time to the occurrence of the adverse effects, the use of patient years as the time frame of the reported adverse effects and the use of annual standard incidence ratios based on the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results (SEER) programme when reporting neoplasms as potential adverse effects of TNFalpha antagonists were specifically tabulated.

RESULTS

Only 23 of 70 (33%) of all articles gave the specific time of onset of an adverse effect. Nine studies used patient years to report the adverse effects and six studies used annual standard incidence ratios, using SEER, as the comparator.

CONCLUSION

In reporting of adverse effects in randomised clinical trials, a particularly neglected issue is the reporting of the time dimension of adverse effects.

The treatment of the rheumatological manifestations of the inflammatory bowel diseases

The strong link between the bowel and the osteo-articular system is suggested by many clinical and experimental observations. However, the therapeutic approach is still empirical. For symptomatic therapy it is better to favour the use of steroids and avoid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs because they may induce intestinal ulcerations and can activate inflammatory bowel disease. Second line drugs (sulfasalazine, methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine and leflunomide) should be used for selected indications. In some cases (severe spondylitis, severe and persistent enthesopathy) anti-TNF-alpha agents (infliximab) should be considered as first line therapy. In all cases it is mandatory to select the best therapeutic option for each individual patient, considering that the optimal treatment of bowel inflammation may induce "per se" a remission of the musculo-skeletal manifestations.

Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme criteria for the use of tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in Australia: are they evidence based?

BACKGROUND

In 2004, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) listed infliximab as a subsidised treatment for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Eligibility to receive this treatment for AS involved fulfilling several criteria.

AIM

To examine the medical literature concerning response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors in AS and compare with the PBS criteria for these agents.

METHODS

Review of published studies and analysis of the PBS criteria for the prescription of TNF inhibitors for the treatment of AS to assess whether the published criteria are evidence based.

RESULTS

The published findings on the prediction of response to TNF inhibitors in the treatment of AS suggest that age, duration of disease, disease activity, functional status at the time of commencement of TNF inhibitors and, possibly, level of acute phase reactants predict the outcome of treatment with TNF inhibitors in AS. The PBS criteria do not reflect the published findings on predictors of response to TNF inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

The current PBS criteria that need to be fulfilled for patients to receive subsidised treatment with TNF inhibitors for AS are not evidence based and will lead to the selection of patients with established disease while excluding patients with early disease.