Dose-dense therapy with weekly 1-hour paclitaxel infusions in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Phase I evaluation of continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion followed by weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a phase I trial of escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) in combination with a fixed systemic administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were treated with escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel as a 60 min intravenous (i.v.) infusion, along with a fixed dose of continuous 5-FU infused over 5 days. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients received combination therapy at four dose levels of weekly Taxol, ranging from 60 to 90 mg/m2/week. Dose-limiting toxicities > grade 3 were observed at the 90 mg/m2/week dose level. Toxicities included anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and alopecia. Two episodes of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in two of the three patients receiving this dose. At each dose level, pharmacological studies documented the persistence of significant serum paclitaxel levels over 24 h after drug administration. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for this regimen was 90 mg/m2/week of paclitaxel for 3 weeks plus 600 mg/m2/day of continuous 5-FU for 5 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly paclitaxel and 5-FU demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and feasible pharmacokinetic results suggesting its practical applicability. Based on these findings, the recommended dose and schedule for phase II study of combination chemotherapy is paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week x 3 over 4 weeks, and continuous 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day x 5 days every 4 weeks.

Weekly Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated or Not Treated with Docetaxel: A Phase II Study

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel has been approved for 3-weekly administration in Japan. Recent reports suggest that weekly paclitaxel can achieve a higher tumor response and lower toxicity.

METHODS

This study was designed to investigate the usefulness and tolerability of weekly paclitaxel by 1-hour infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer who were previously treated with docetaxel or other anticancer agents.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 41.2% (14/34, 95% confidence interval: 24.6-59.3%). The median time to progression and the median survival time were 218.5 and 624 days, respectively. One patient developed dyspnea, probably induced by a hypersensitivity reaction. The most common hematological toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia, although no patients developed grade 4 leukopenia or neutropenia and G-CSF support was not required.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel could be safely administered and achieved a relatively high response rate. Weekly paclitaxel would be a good candidate second-line therapy for recurrent or advanced breast cancer.

Conceptual and Practical Implications of Breast Tissue Geometry: Toward a More Effective, Less Toxic Therapy

Mathematics provides greater understanding of the complex process of tumorigenesis. Based on the Gompertzian phenomenon and the Norton-Simon hypothesis, enhanced cell kill can be obtained through a greater chemotherapy dose rate. Results from the 1995 Bonadonna et al. study and the CALGB/Intergroup C9741 study demonstrated that patients in the dose-dense arms had significantly longer disease-free survival and overall survival. Because of the demonstrated applicability of Gompertzian kinetics, attention has been turned to the etiology of the Gompertzian curve. Breast tumor dimensions, as with all tissue dimensions in biology, can be calculated by fractals. A less cell-dense tissue usually has a lower fractal dimension than a tissue with more cells (i.e., a higher cell density is usually due to a higher fractal dimension). Density is the number of cells divided by the tissue volume. When allowed to grow, the density of a tissue with a lower fractal dimension drops quickly. However, a tumor, since it has a higher fractal mass dimension, maintains a high density as it grows bigger, resulting in a more rapid growth rate and a larger final size. Fractal dimensions of infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas of the breast are high (i.e., 2.98), which results in a very dense tissue compared with normal breast tissue (with a fractal dimension of about 2.25). As expected, the higher fractal dimension results in a high rate of growth. The reason for this high fractal dimension is that breast cancer can be considered as a conglomerate of many small Gompertzian tumors, each of which has a high cell density and hence ratio of mitosis to apoptosis. In mathematical terms, each component of the conglomerate can be considered a small metastasis in itself. Thus, the primary tumor is composed of multiple self-metastases that form around a seed from the tumor to itself. Conventional thinking is that cancers metastasize because they are large, but in fact it may be that they are large because they are self-metastatic. Many genes are associated with the biology of metastasis; these include: A) obligatory cancer genes (most of which regulate mitosis and mitotic rate); B) genes relating to self-metastasis and growth of tumors at local sites, conferring the ability to invade and grow with high cell density; and C) genes that relate to the ability of the cancer to metastasize to distant areas. Additionally, fibroblasts may send out abnormal growth signals causing abnormal breast tissue growth. Consequently, we are not only dealing with abnormal cancer cells, but also with the tissue that surrounds them, or the microenvironment, that is, the "Smith-Bissell" model. These new insights may lead us to change the thrust of our attack from genes involved in mitosis to those involved in metastasis, including metastasis to self, and to use and further improve dose-dense regimens.

Tapering and discontinuation of glucocorticoid prophylaxis during prolonged weekly to biweekly paclitaxel administration

BACKGROUND

Taxanes cause hypersensitivity reactions, averted by premedication with H1 blockers and high glucocorticoid (GC) doses. Prolonged weekly taxane administration may lead to GC toxicity.

PURPOSE

To determine whether patients not hypersensitive to initial paclitaxel (PTX) infusion after high-dose GC premedication will tolerate subsequent, prolonged PTX treatment without GC prophylaxis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 115/122 breast cancer patients not hypersensitive to initial PTX treatment, 20 mg dexamethasone (DXM) doses were tapered by 2.0 mg/week, reaching 0 in those receiving 9 or more courses. After 4 PTX courses, diphenhydramine was administered orally, rather than intravenously.

RESULTS

PTX was administered 143 times after 2.0-5.0 mg of DXM and 357 times without DXM. A total of 46 patients received 1-40 PTX courses without DXM. None of these 115 patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions.

CONCLUSION

Patients unreactive to their first PTX infusions, after high-dose and tapering GC premedication, may not require GC prophylaxis for subsequent PTX therapy.

The Combination of the Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor Celecoxib with Weekly Paclitaxel Is a Safe and Active Second-Line Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The selection of effective schedules of treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer still remains a challenge for the oncologist. The present multicentric phase II study was designed in order to investigate the activity and safety of the combination of weekly paclitaxel and celecoxib as second-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. As a secondary endpoint, the possible correlation of biomarkers with objective response was investigated in a subset of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with platinum-refractory non-small cell lung cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 entered the present phase II study. Paclitaxel was administered at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest, and celecoxib, 400 mg p.o. b.i.d. administered continuously. A cycle consisted of 8 weeks of treatment. Determination of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin 6 was performed at baseline and every two cycles.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled: median age, 60 years (range, 30-77 years); male/female ratio = 44/14; performance status, 0, 31 patients; 1, 25 patients; and 2, two patients. Predominant histotype was adenocarcinoma (34 cases), and most patients had at least two sites of disease. According to the intent-to-treat analysis, 14/58 objective responses (24.1%) and 24/58 (41.3%) stabilizations of disease were observed, with a median duration of 4 months (range, 2-22+ months) and 5 months (range, 1-13 months), respectively. Median time to progression and median overall survival were 5 and 11 months, respectively. One-year survival was 42.5%. The main toxicity was neuropathy (4% of grade 3). Preliminary results suggest that decrease in serum vascular endothelial growth factor level is significantly associated with clinical response.

DISCUSSION

Combination of celecoxib and weekly paclitaxel is safe and active new regimen in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer. Toxicity appears not to be worsened by the addition of celecoxib. According to preliminary results, serum vascular endothelial growth factor level seems to be predictive of response, suggesting that it should be further investigated as a surrogate marker of response.

A phase I study of doxifluridine combined with weekly paclitaxel for metastatic gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Based on the synergistic effect in preclinical studies, a phase I clinical trial for the combination of paclitaxel and doxifluridine (an intermetabolite of capecitabine) was performed to determine the recommended dose for the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

The dose of paclitaxel was increased from 60 mg/m2 at level 1 to 90 mg/m2 at level 5. It was administered as a 1-h infusion on days 1 and 8. The dose of doxifluridine was fixed at 600 mg/m2 per day up to level 3, and escalated to 800 mg/m2 per day at levels 4 and 5. It was administered orally for 2 weeks. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at levels 1 and 2 (paclitaxel 70 mg/m2). A DLT of grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 4 days was observed in one patient at level 3 (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2). In addition, the first five of six patients in this group experienced grade 3 neutropenia during the first treatment cycle. A further six patients were added in order to confirm the safety of this dosage level, and no more DLTs except for grade 3 nausea in one patient were observed in the second cohort. No DLT was seen in three patients at level 4 (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2). DLTs (grade 3 neuropathy in one patient and a treatment delay of the second cycle for more than 1 week due to grade 3 neutropenia in another) were observed in two out of six patients at level 5 (paclitaxel 90 mg/m2), and this dose level was determined as the maximum tolerated dose. The tumor response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval 20-67%) in 19 patients with measurable lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose was determined as 80 mg/m2 of paclitaxel (days 1 and 8) and 800 mg/m2) of doxifluridine (days 1-14) every 3 weeks. The results of this phase I study are encouraging and a phase II trial is thus warranted.

Paclitaxel, vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil in breast cancer patients pretreated with adjuvant anthracyclines

We investigated the activity and toxicity of a combination of vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel (PTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion administered as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with adjuvant anthracyclines. A total of 61 patients received a regimen consisting of VNB 25 mg m⁻² on days 1 and 15, PTX 60 mg m⁻² on days 1, 8 and 15 and continuous infusion of 5-FU at 200 mg m⁻² every day. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Disease response was evaluated by both RECIST and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Objective responses were recorded in 39 of 61 patients (64.0%) assessed by WHO and in 36 of 50 patients (72.0%) assessable by RECIST criteria. Complete remission occurred in 15 (24.6%) and 14 patients (28.0%), respectively. The median time to progression and overall survival of entire population was 10.6 and 27.3 months, respectively, and median duration of complete response was 14.8 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression (leucopenia grade 3/4 in 52.5% of patients). Grade 3/4 nonhaematologic toxicities included mucositis/diarrhoea in 13.1%, skin in 3.3% and cardiac in 1.6% of patients. Grade 2/3 neurotoxicity was observed in five patients (7.2%). The VNB, PTX and 5-FU continuous infusion combination regimen was active and manageable. Complete responses were frequent and durable.

A multicentre, randomised phase II study of weekly or 3-weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

A phase II randomised trial was conducted to evaluate the tolerability and activity of weekly or 3-weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-three patients with histologically proven metastatic breast cancer were randomised to receive either docetaxel 40 mg/m2 weekly for 6 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks without treatment (n = 41), or docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (n = 42).

RESULTS

The incidence of all grade 3-4 adverse events was higher in the 3-weekly group than in the weekly group (96 versus 44), and the number of patients with grade 3-4 adverse events was also greater in the 3-weekly group (31 versus 20). Analysis of individual adverse events tended to favour the weekly regimen. Intent-to-treat overall response rate was 34% and 33% in the weekly and 3-weekly groups, respectively. Median time to progression was 5.7 and 5.3 months after weekly and 3-weekly docetaxel, respectively, and median time to treatment failure was 4.1 and 4.9 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Weekly docetaxel is an active regimen in metastatic breast cancer with comparable efficacy to 3 weekly docetaxel. Although both schedules were well tolerated, weekly docetaxel appears to have a more favourable toxicity profile.

Weekly paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in elderly advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II study of the Gruppo Italiano di Oncologia Geriatrica (GIOGer)

BACKGROUND

First-line chemotherapy regimens suitable for elderly advanced breast cancer patients are still not defined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with stage III or IV breast cancer aged > or =70 years were enrolled in a phase II study aimed to evaluate both activity and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel. Among 46 planned patients, at least 18 responses and not more than seven unacceptable toxic events are required for a favourable conclusion. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) was administered weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days.

RESULTS

Unacceptable toxicity occurred in seven out of 46 patients evaluated for toxicity [15.2%; exact 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.6% to 28.2%] and was represented by one case of febrile neutropenia, one case of severe allergic reaction and five cases of cardiac toxicity. Among 41 patients evaluated for response, a complete response occurred in two (4.9%) patients and a partial response in 20 (48.8%), with an overall response rate of 53.7% (exact 95% CI 38.7% to 67.9%). The median progression-free survival was 9.7 months (95% CI 8.5-18.7) and median survival was 35.8 months (95% CI 19-not defined).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel is highly active in elderly advanced breast cancer patients. Data on cardiovascular complications, however, indicate the need for a careful monitoring of cardiac function before and during chemotherapy.

Efficacy of weekly paclitaxel in patients with docetaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Partial cross-resistance to paclitaxel and docetaxel has been demonstrated in pre-clinical studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) in 82 patients with docetaxel-resisitant metastatic breast cancer. Docetaxel resistance was classified into primary resistance, defined as progressive disease while receiving docetaxel, and secondary resistance, defined as progression after achievement of a documented clinical response to docetaxel. Secondary resistance was subclassified according to the interval between the final infusion of docetaxel and the start of weekly paclitaxel into: (1) short interval, < or =120 days, and (2) long interval, >120 days.

RESULTS

The response rate of the 82 patients was 19.5% (95% confidence interval, 10.8-27.9%). The response rate according to the docetaxel resistance category was: primary resistance (n = 24), 8.3%; secondary resistance (n = 58), 24.1% (short interval [n = 39], 17.9%, and long interval, [n = 19], 36.8%). The differences in response rates among the three categories were statistically significant (p = 0.0247, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). The interval between from the final docetaxel infusion and disease progression were predictors for response of weekly paclitaxel.

CONCLUSION

Weekly paclitaxel is modestly effective and safe in docetaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer patients. However, weekly paclitaxel should not be recommended for primary resistance patients with docetaxel.

Dose and schedule as determinants of outcomes in chemotherapy for breast cancer

Many cytotoxic agents for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer are available, but they have produced only modest results, even when the tumor burden is low. This relative lack of efficacy may be attributed, in part, to the nonspecificity of the current regimens. Additionally, there is evidence that the chemotherapy doses used in clinical practice are not optimal, which potentially compromises the outcomes when the thresholds of dose intensity are not reached. Variations in treatment underscore the need to return to the basics of chemotherapy administration: dose, schedule, concentration threshold, and therapeutic index. In patients with metastatic breast cancer a clear dose-response curve has been shown with some agents, including anthracyclines. The E-max model, which in its simplest form assumes a direct relation between the dose of a drug and its effect, may be used to improve dosing in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Consistent with this model, threshold effects have been observed in treatment with both anthracyclines and paclitaxel for breast cancer. There is also evidence that using dose-dense schedules may produce better outcomes with some regimens. Maintaining chemotherapy agents at full dose on schedule is crucial to treatment success, especially in adjuvant therapy. Consequently, treatment practices should use both dose intensity and dose compression to increase the likelihood of positive outcomes in patients with breast cancer.

The role of the liposomal anthracyclines and other systemic therapies in the management of advanced breast cancer

For patients whose breast cancers are not responsive to endocrine therapy, there are a large number of cytotoxic drugs that will induce a response. In spite of the introduction of new, very active drugs such as the taxanes, vinorelbine, capecitabine, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab, the anthracyclines are still as active as any--and more active than most--drugs used to treat breast cancer. Their inclusion in combinations to treat early and advanced disease prolongs survival. However, they cause nausea, vomiting, alopecia, myelosuppression, mucositis, and cardiomyopathies. There is no evidence that increasing the dose of conventional anthracyclines or any other of the cytotoxics beyond standard doses will improve outcomes. Schedule may be more important than dose in determining the benefit of cytotoxics used to treat breast cancer. Weekly schedules and continuous infusions of 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin may have some advantages over more intermittent schedules. Liposomal formations of doxorubicin reduce toxicity, including cardiotoxicity; theoretically they should also be more effective because of better targeting of tumor over normal tissues. Both pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx [PLD]) and liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet [NPLD]) appeared to be as effective as conventional doxorubicin and much less toxic in multiple phase II and phase III studies. PLD has been evaluated in combinations with cyclophosphamide, the taxanes, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab, and NPLD has been evaluated in combination with cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab. Both liposomal anthracyclines are less cardiotoxic than conventional doxorubicin. The optimal dose of PLD is lower than that of conventional doxorubicin or NPLD. Patients treated with PLD have almost no alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, but its use is associated with stomatitis and hand-foot syndrome, which can be avoided or minimized with the use of proper dose-schedules. In contrast, the optimal dose-schedule of NPLD is nearly identical to that of conventional doxorubicin. The toxicity profile of NPLD is similar to that of conventional doxorubicin, but toxicities are less severe and NPLD is better tolerated than conventional doxorubicin at higher doses.

Capecitabine with weekly paclitaxel for advanced breast cancer: a phase I dose-finding trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity and activity of combined weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with metastatic breast cancer, of whom 15 were evaluable for toxicity and response, were enrolled in 7 Swiss centers. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 was given intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15. Capecitabine was administered orally on days 1 through 14 using five different dose levels. Both drugs were given in a 21-day schedule.

RESULTS

Capecitabine could be administered at doses commonly used for the drug as a single agent, i.e. 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily in combination with weekly paclitaxel. Hematological and other toxicities did not appear to be dose-limiting; however, significant skin and nail toxicities were observed. A response or stable disease was observed in 87% of patients [13/15; exact 95% confidence interval (CI) 60-98%], with 2 complete responses, 4 partial responses (overall response rate 40%, exact 95% CI 16-68%) and 7 patients with stable disease for at least 9 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The phase I evaluation of capecitabine in combination with fixed-dose weekly paclitaxel did not allow the definition of an MTD of capecitabine based on the predefined criteria. Instead, the dose for the phase II evaluation was determined based on the occurrence of toxicity in later courses and on experience with other regimens containing capecitabine. Capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-14, every 3 weeks) with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 weekly) is a promising combination for advanced breast cancer now being investigated in a phase II trial.

Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine, As First-Line Chemotherapy, Combined with Trastuzumab in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study Conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)

PURPOSE

Advanced breast cancer (ABC) is an incurable disease. Standard first-line treatment for patients with HER-2/neu overexpressing tumors includes the combination of the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab with chemotherapy, mainly paclitaxel. This combination is the first to demonstrate a survival advantage in this group of patients. To improve on these results, we investigated a triplet, paclitaxel-gemcitabine-trastuzumab (TGH), in a phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with ABC were accrued to the study. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, and trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose and then 2 mg/kg/week. Patients were treated on study for a total of 12 weeks. Response evaluation was performed at the end of the 12 weeks. Continuation of treatment beyond the 12 weeks was left to the discretion of the investigator. Primary study endpoint was response. Toxicity assessment and survival were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Between November 2000 and May 2002, 40 patients were accrued and 32 patients completed all 12 weeks of therapy. One patient died of septic shock during therapy. Grade III and IV neutropenia was seen in 12.5% of cases each. Grade III anemia was seen in two patients, and grade III and IV thrombocytopenia in three and two patients, respectively. Both paclitaxel and gemcitabine were delivered at 86% of the planned dose intensity. Six patients achieved a complete response (CR) and 15 a partial response for an overall response rate of 52.5%. An additional 25% demonstrated stable disease and 20% progressive disease. Median duration of response was 14 months. All six patients who achieved CR are still in CR for 6 to 19 months. After a median follow up of 12.2 months, 19 patients have progressed and 7 have died. Median time to progression is 13.7 months, whereas median survival has not been reached.

CONCLUSION

TGH is a well-tolerated and effective regimen for the first-line treatment of ABC. Randomized comparison between paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and triplets are warranted.

Phase II Study of Weekly Paclitaxel for Docetaxel-Resistant Metastatic Breast Cancer in Japan

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of weekly paclitaxel (PTX) against metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that was resistant to docetaxel (DTX) given every 3 weeks. A multicenter phase II study was performed. Women with MBC resistant to DTX were eligible for enrollment. DTX resistance was defined as no tumor response to DTX and stable disease, partial response, or complete response to DTX preceding disease progression. PTX 80 mg/m(2) was administered over 1 hour once a week for 3 weeks per 4-week cycle. Among 47 enrolled patients, 46 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The overall objective response rate (complete responses [CRs] and partial responses [PRs]) was 17.4% and overall clinical benefit rate (CRs, PRs, and stable disease >or=24 weeks) was 26.1%. The median time to progression was 11 weeks. There were a few severe hematologic toxicities related to the therapy, with grade 4 neutropenia (4.3%) and thrombocytopenia (2.2%). Grade 3 anaphylaxis and grade 3 neuropathy were observed in one patient (2.2%) each. The median delivered dose intensity was 77.6 mg/m(2)/week, 97.1% of the planned dose intensity. Weekly PTX has activity in patients with MBC resistant to DTX every 3 weeks.

Weekly paclitaxel combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx™) given every 4 weeks: dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

We aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the toxicity of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD; Caelyx trade mark ) and weekly paclitaxel (wPTX), and to investigate pharmacokinetics of PLD in this combination.

METHODS

A phase I study was performed with an initial dose of 50 mg/m(2) wPTX and 30 mg/m(2) PLD. The paclitaxel dose was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m(2) and PLD in increments of 5 mg/m(2) until the MTD was reached. The pharmacokinetics of PLD were studied at the highest achieved dose levels.

RESULTS

Forty-four cancer patients were enrolled. The MTD was 30/90 and 35/80 mg/m(2) for PLD/wPTX. Dose-limiting toxicities included treatment delay for neutropenia grade 3, febrile neutropenia, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and deep venous thrombosis. Toxicity below the MTD was mild: skin toxicity grade 1-2 developed at high cumulative doses and vascular thrombotic events occurred in two patients with predisposing factors. No cardiotoxicity or clinically relevant peripheral neuropathy was seen. Nausea/vomiting and alopecia were negligible. Three complete responses and nine partial responses were documented among 34 evaluable cases. PLD plasma concentrations were evaluated in seven patients treated at subMTD. Paclitaxel produced a median 53.5% increase of PLD area under the concentration curve (range 4.4%-219%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PLD/wPTX constitutes an active chemotherapy regimen with mild toxicity that merits investigation in phase II at 30/80 or 35/70 mg/m(2). Patients should be monitored for a potentially increased risk of thromboembolic events.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Paclitaxel for Liver Metastasis from Gastric Cancer

Little is known about hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of paclitaxel for hepatic malignancies. The authors administered paclitaxel via the HAI port in two patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer. Both patients were uneventfully treated without any serious complications, and its anti-tumor effect on 5-fluouracil resistant liver metastases was confirmed. However, the kinetics of venous paclitaxel concentration following HAI was similar to that after intravenous injection. Our findings did not support the advantage of paclitaxel HAI therapy, although HAI of this agent was well tolerated.

Phase II Study of Feasibility of Dose-Dense FEC Followed by Alternating Weekly Taxanes in High-Risk, Four or More Node-Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To develop a potentially superior adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, we conducted a pilot study of dose-dense 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by weekly alternating taxanes. The primary objective was to determine the feasibility of the regimen; the secondary objective was to estimate the disease-free and overall survival.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with >/=4 node-positive breast cancer were studied. Treatment consisted of FEC at 500/100/500 mg/m(2), respectively, x6 at two-week intervals with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, followed by weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) alternating with docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)) x18.

RESULTS

Between November 2001 and January 2003, 44 patients were enrolled. Median age was 46 years (range, 26-63 years), median number of positive nodes was 9 (range, 4-32), and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (range, 0.6-11.0 cm). Because of unexpected toxicities, the study was stopped when 17 (39%) had fully completed all of the planned treatment. Two of 17 (12%) developed grade 4 pericardial/grade 3 bilateral pleural effusions at treatment completion; both required pericardial window. The remaining patients were treated with taxanes using one of several standard dose and schedule combinations. Furthermore, 4 of 44 (9%) developed pneumonitis attributed to the FEC regimen. Hospital admissions were required for 12 of 44 (27%); 3 of 44 (7%) required blood transfusions. There were no treatment related deaths. Median disease-free and overall survival will not be estimatable because of early closure of study.

CONCLUSION

FEC x6 at 2-week intervals followed by 18 weeks of alternating taxanes is not feasible at the doses tested. Other strategies are needed to improve adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.

Docetaxel and paclitaxel in the treatment of breast cancer: a review of clinical experience

In the 10 years since their initial licensing in Europe, the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have emerged as fundamental drugs in the treatment of breast cancer. Clinically meaningful benefits were first shown in the metastatic setting, and large-scale exploration of their roles in the adjuvant therapy of early-stage disease is ongoing. Benefits have been seen in the neoadjuvant setting as well, mainly with docetaxel. This paper reviews the current roles of the taxanes in the treatment of metastatic and early-stage breast cancer. Also addressed are outstanding issues involving optimal dosing and sequencing, as well as a discussion of the relative merits of each agent in this setting. Clinicians should choose a taxane-based regimen for their patients with breast cancer based on consideration of the pharmacokinetics, clinical activity, and dosing schedule that best meets the patients' needs. At the current time, the pharmacokinetic profile, consistent positive clinical results, and convenience of an intermittent, short-infusion schedule have made docetaxel the preferred taxane for many clinicians treating patients with breast cancer.

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

A growing number of patients, mainly cisplatin-pretreated, require second-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but the optimal treatment and appropriate criteria for patient selection have not been defined yet. A second-line phase II study was conducted in cisplatin-pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC to evaluate the activity and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel. Fifty-three consecutive NSCLC patients (9 stage IIIA-B, 44 stage IV) progressing after one front line cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Previous treatment with taxanes was not allowed. Patients with stage III were also pretreated with thoracic radiotherapy. Weekly paclitaxel was administered as 1-h infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) for three weeks with one week off, for a maximum of four courses. All patients were assessable for response, toxicity and survival. A complete response was observed in one case, partial response in 7, for an overall response rate (RR) of 15%, (95% Cl = 5-25%). Stable disease (SD) was registered in 11 patients, for an overall clinical benefit (CB = RR + SD) of 36% (95% Cl = 23-49%). Toxicity was mild, with G3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 6 and 2% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicities were negligible. No significant correlation between patient or treatment-related variable and RR was observed. CB was significantly higher in patients with non-squamous histology (P = 0.03) and no progression within 4 months of first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy (P = 0.007). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months in responders and 4 months in pts with SD. PFS was significantly related to good performance status (PS) (P = 0.002) and non-squamous histology (P = 0.004). In conclusion, weekly paclitaxel has acceptable palliative activity and excellent tolerance in cisplatin-pretreated patients. Patients with PS 0-1, non-squamous histology and with no progression within 4 months of first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy seem more likely to benefit from this treatment.

Safety and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel administered as a 1-hour infusion versus a 3-hour infusion for various malignancies

This study challenges the current practice of administering paclitaxel for a variety of malignancies over 3 hours and documents the safety and cost-effectiveness of 1-hour administration in the outpatient setting. The authors investigated opportunities to save nursing time and costs in a cancer clinic without compromising patient safety. These savings are referred to as "opportunity-cost savings" that enable the clinic to schedule more patients during the time normally required to administer a 3-hour paclitaxel dose. Over a 2-year period, the authors were able to document significant time savings with no increase in adverse drug reactions.

Phase II study of capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer

The addition of oral capecitabine to docetaxel improves response rate, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This phase II study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a 21-day cycle of oral capecitabine (1000 mg m⁻² twice daily, days 1–14) plus i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg m⁻², day 1) in anthracycline-pretreated advanced/MBC. In all, 73 patients were enrolled at 13 Swedish and Spanish centres. The objective response rate was 52% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40–63%) in the intent-to-treat population, including complete responses in 11%. Disease was stabilised in a further 29%. The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 8.1 months and the median overall survival was 16.5 months. The combination was generally well tolerated with a predictable safety profile. The most common treatment-related nonhaematological adverse events were hand–foot syndrome (42%), alopecia (30%) and diarrhoea (26%). The only treatment-related Grade 3/4 adverse events occurring in >5% of patients were alopecia (22%) and hand–foot syndrome (11%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and lymphocytopenia were reported in 12 and 14% of patients, respectively. Capecitabine plus paclitaxel is highly active with a favourable safety profile in anthracycline-pretreated MBC.

Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342

PURPOSE

Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9342 was initiated to determine the optimal dose of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks to women with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred seventy-four women with metastatic breast cancer who had received one or no prior chemotherapy regimens were randomly assigned to one of three paclitaxel dosing regimens-175 mg/m(2), 210 mg/m(2), or 250 mg/m(2)-each administered as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Women completed self-administered quality of life and symptom assessment questionnaires at baseline and after three cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

No evidence of a significant dose-response relationship was demonstrated over the dose range assessed. Response rates were 23%, 26%, and 21% for the three regimens, respectively. A marginally significant association (P =.04) was seen between dose and time to progression; however, in a multivariate analysis, the difference was even less apparent. No statistically significant difference was seen in survival. Neurotoxicity and hematologic toxicity were more severe on the higher dose arms. There was no significant difference in quality of life on the three arms.

CONCLUSION

Higher doses of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion to women with metastatic breast cancer did not improve response rate, survival, or quality of life. There was a slight improvement in time to progression with higher dose therapy, which was offset by greater toxicity. When a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel is administered every 3 weeks, 175 mg/m(2) should be considered the optimal dose.

Phase II study of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Kansai Clinical Oncology Group study

The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in previously untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients received paclitaxel at a dose of 70 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and carboplatin with the target dose of area under the curve (AUC) of 6 on day 1 every 28 days. Forty-six patients were enrolled. A median of four cycles (range, 1-13) were administered. Complete response was observed in one patient (2.2%) and partial response in 23 patients (50%), yielding an overall intent-to-treat response rate of 52.2% (95% confidence interval, 37.8-66.6%). The median survival time was 395 days and 1-year survival rate was 51.4%. Toxicities were mild. Twelve patients (26%) had grade 3 and three patients (7%) had grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in four patients (8%). Massive hematoemesis due to duodenal ulcer was observed in one patient, but no other patients experienced grade 3 or more non-hematological toxicities. There was no treatment-related death. Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel combination chemotherapy is an efficacious and feasible regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC, and this treatment will be a reasonable alternative to the conventional triweekly regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin.

Phase I/II study of cisplatin combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel administered weekly with a fixed dose of cisplatin, and to assess the toxicity and activity of this combination, we conducted a phase I/II trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were eligible. Paclitaxel, at a starting dose of 40 mg m⁻² week⁻¹ on days 1, 8, and 15, was combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin 80 mg m⁻² on day 1. Chemotherapy was given in a 4-week cycle. In this phase I/II study, 38 patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were neutropenia, fatigue, and omission of treatment due to leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, or febrile neutropenia. The MTD and RD were estimated to be 70 mg m⁻². Of the 37 assessable patients, 23 had a partial response and one had a complete response. Overall response rate was 62.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.5–77.7%). The progression-free survival, the median survival time, and the 1-year survival rate were 5.5 months, 13.7 months, and 56.9%, respectively. This regimen is tolerable and very active against advanced NSCLC, and its efficacy should be confirmed in a phase III study.

A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of a fixed dose of paclitaxel followed by increasing doses of carboplatin, given weekly to patients with advanced esophageal or gastric junction cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Paclitaxel was administered on day 1 as a 1-h infusion at a fixed dose of 100 mg/m(2) followed by a 1-h infusion of carboplatin targeting an area under the curve (AUC) of 2-5 mg x min/ml, with cycles repeated on days 8, 15, 29, 36, and 43.

RESULTS

Forty patients [36 males; median (range) age, 57 (40-74) years] were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at a carboplatin AUC of 5 mg x min/ml and consisted of treatment delay attributable to myelosuppression. No grade 3/4 treatment-related nonhematological toxicity was observed. The highest dose intensity (>95% of the planned dose over time) was achieved with a carboplatin AUC of 4 mg x min/ml. The mean (+/-SD) AUCs of unbound (Cu) and total paclitaxel were 0.662 +/- 0.186 and 7.37 +/- 1.33 micro M x h, respectively. Clearance of Cu was 188 +/- 44.6 liter/h/m(2), which is not significantly different from historical data (P = 0.52). Cremophor EL clearance was 123 +/- 23 ml/h/m(2), similar to previous findings. Of 37 patients evaluable for response, 1 had complete response, 19 had partial response, and 10 had stable disease, accounting for an overall response rate of 54%.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen is very tolerable and effective, and the recommended doses for additional studies are paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)), with carboplatin targeting an AUC of 4 mg x min/ml.

Recent translational research: antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer - where do we stand?

The central importance of angiogenesis and our understanding of how new blood vessels are formed have led to the development of novel antiangiogenic therapies. Although the number of agents in development has grown exponentially, only one phase III trial in breast cancer has been completed. In that study the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine did not extend the progression-free survival of patients with refractory disease as compared with capecitabine monotherapy. Early enthusiasm for antiangiogenic therapy must give way to clinical reality. Our challenge now is to exploit better the activity of antiangiogenic agents seen in the early clinical studies.

Neurotoxicity of taxanes: symptoms and quality of life assessment

Paclitaxel (TXL) and docetaxel (TXT), especially TXL, cause neurotoxicity manifested as polyneuropathy. In clinical practice, detailed knowledge of the symptoms and effect on quality of life (QOL) of neurotoxicity is crucially important both for diagnosis of neuropathy and for management of patients treated with taxanes. In this review, we summarize the symptoms of neurotoxicity caused by taxanes, and highlight the importance of QOL assessment in breast cancer patients treated with taxanes. The most common feature of taxane neurotoxicity is a predominant sensory distal neuropathy, and the incidence and severity of the neuropathic manifestations appear to be related to dose level and cumulative dose. A mixture of paresthesias and dysesthesias is often prominent, and the complaints include burning dysesthesia, numbness, tingling, and shooting pains, typically in a stocking-glove distribution. In contrast to sensory disturbances, motor neuropathy is not well recognized, and is believed to be much less common than sensory neuropathy. Weakness is usually mild, and distal motor neuropathy caused by taxanes rarely affects patients' activities of daily living. The effect of neurotoxicity on QOL is not fully understood, as no study has specifically assessed QOL in terms of neurotoxicity. There is therefore a clear need to collect more detailed data about QOL using well validated, reliable instruments. This will enable us to provide the information that patients require when treatment decisions are being made, and will help in the pursuit of the ameliorative interventions.

Multicenter Phase II study of estramustine phosphate plus weekly paclitaxel in patients with androgen-independent prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study determined the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel in combination with estramustine phosphate (EMP) in patients with androgen-independent prostate carcinoma (AIPC).

METHODS

Patients with progressive AIPC received 90 mg/m2 paclitaxel by 1-hour intravenous infusion weekly for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week treatment rest. Patients received 140 mg EMP orally 3 times daily on the day before, the day of, and the day after paclitaxel administration. Patients received 1 mg warfarin daily to prevent thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients with progressive AIPC received treatment at 29 centers. Forty-two percent of patients had a 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA; 95% confidence interval [CI], 30-54%). For 26 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, the objective response rate was 15% (95% CI, 1-30%). The median time to disease progression was 6.3 months, and the median time to PSA progression was 11.4 months. The median survival period was 15.6 months. Grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon and included thromboembolism (8%), anemia (3%), neutropenia (3%), and peripheral neuropathy (2%). There was one treatment-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen of EMP plus weekly paclitaxel was an active and well tolerated treatment for patients with AIPC.

The effect of single weekly paclitaxel in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent or persistent advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

We have reported that single weekly paclitaxel has moderate activity in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients and is associated with a favorable toxicity profile. The purpose of this study was to reconfirm the effect of weekly paclitaxel in more number of cases.

METHODS

Although 39 patients were enrolled, 37 patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer previously treated with between one and three chemotherapeutic regimens containing platinum were eligible. Patients had measurable or assessable disease defined by clinical exam, radiographic studies, or serum CA 125. One cycle of treatment consisted of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week in 1-h infusion, 3 weeks on, 1 week off, and repeated at least twice. Two patients were withdrawn because of refusal of further treatment for neuropathy after the first cycle. Clinical responses were defined by established criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were included in this intent-to-treat study. The overall clinical response rate was 45.9% (5 complete responses, 12 partial responses). The clinical response rate in patients with measurable tumor was 25.0% (2 complete responses, 1 partial response), while that in patients without measurable tumor and with assessable CA 125 levels was 56.0% (3 complete responses, 11 partial responses). Clinical response rate in patients with chemotherapy-free interval more than 6 months had about twice higher than that in patients with chemotherapy-free interval less than 6 months. The clinical response rate by number of prior regimens revealed that as number of prior regimens increases, the response rate decreases.

CONCLUSION

Weekly paclitaxel has significant antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian carcinoma and warrants as second or third line chemotherapy in such setting.

Biweekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer: phase II trial and predictive value of HER2 extracellular domain

BACKGROUND

We wanted to assess the toxicity and efficacy of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer and to confirm whether circulating HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) correlates with treatment response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients received paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine 2500 mg/m2, both on day 1 of 14-day cycles, with a maximum of eight cycles. Serum levels of HER2 ECD were assessed by ELISA.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 42 for efficacy. Overall toxicity was low. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 12% of patients and grade 4 in 17%, and other grade 3 toxicities in <5%. One patient had an allergic infusion reaction. Overall response rate was 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) 62% to 81%], with 11 patients achieving a complete response (26%). With a median follow-up of 26 months, the median time to progression was 16.6 months. Response rate correlated significantly with HER2 ECD, with 42% of HER2 ECD-positive patients responding versus 83% of HER2 ECD-negative patients (P = 0.02). Furthermore, response duration was shorter in patients with positive HER2 ECD levels (7.9 versus 14.4 months; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine given as an every 2-weeks schedule is a well tolerated and active regimen in advanced breast carcinoma. This is an attractive combination to use when anthracyclines are not indicated, such as in HER2 positive cases that receive trastuzumab. In addition, elevated levels of HER2 ECD adversely affect the efficacy of treatment.

Weekly Paclitaxel in Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of 52 Patients

Single-agent paclitaxel has been shown to be effective as both first- and second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and the efficacy and tolerability of weekly administration of paclitaxel has generated much interest. Fifty-two patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer who were admitted to Hacettepe University between January 2001 and June 2002 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Paclitaxel was administered weekly in a dose of 80 mg/m(2) over 1 hour. The median number of cycles delivered was 20 weeks (range, 8 to 24). The median delivered dose was 2400 mg (range, 960 to 3840 mg). At a median follow-up of 12.3 months (range, 6 to 17), all patients were assessable for response and toxicity. A complete response and partial response were observed in 7 (13.5%), and 19 (36.5%) patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 50%. Median duration of response was 10 months (range, 3 to 16). Therapy was generally well tolerated, and toxicities were manageable. Severe leukopenia was seen in two (4%) patients. Based on these results, we conclude that weekly paclitaxel is a well-tolerated and highly effective regimen in pre-treated metastatic breast cancer.

Metronomic therapy for breast cancer

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs treat cancer either by direct killing or by inhibition of growth of cycling tumor cells. In addition, evidence suggests that cytotoxic agents may inhibit tumor growth through an antiangiogenic mechanism. "Metronomic" or frequent continuous administration of the same chemotherapeutic agents at lower doses may optimize their antiangiogenic properties. The effectiveness of metronomic chemotherapy regimens can be improved significantly by concurrent administration of antiangiogenic, endothelial-specific drugs. Preclinical studies have shown that integrating chemotherapy with antiangiogenic drugs can improve efficacy and circumvent the toxicity and drug resistance associated with standard or high-dose chemotherapy. Preliminary clinical studies have shown similar results. Further confirmation of this concept is required with randomized, controlled clinical trials.

A case of chest wall recurrence of breast cancer treated with paclitaxel weekly, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, arterial embolization and chest wall resection

Chest wall resection and reconstruction has proved to be a safe surgical procedure for local recurrence of breast cancer. Recently, as second- or third-line chemotherapy for the patients with recurrent breast cancer or ovarian cancer, weekly paclitaxel has provided a significant response rate in those patients, and generated much clinical interest. We report here a case of chest wall recurrence of breast cancer successfully treated by a combination of weekly paclitaxel, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, arterial embolization, and chest wall resection. A 56-year-old woman presented with a large mass in the left anterior chest. A recurrent tumor developed and enlarged one-and-half years after undergoing modified radical mastectomy for advanced breast cancer (T4N2M0, stage III B) at another hospital. The mass had enlarged while the patient underwent chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and anastozole, followed by low-dose cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and goserelin. To reduce the mass and inflammatory changes of the skin, weekly paclitaxel and 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine was given. Furthermore, to obtain hemostasis and promote the mass reduction, arterial embolization of the supply arteries was performed. Chest wall resection, reconstruction of the bony chest wall with polypropylene mesh folded 8 times, and soft tissue reconstruction with a contralateral myocutaneous flap were carried out successfully. The patient was discharged from the hospital ten weeks after the operation without any major morbidity, and remained well for ten months. A multimodal approach with chemotherapy and arterial embolization was effective in this case in treating chest wall recurrence of breast cancer. Reconstruction of the chest wall bone with polypropylene mesh folded 8 times and soft tissue reconstruction with a contralateral myocutaneous flap was a useful procedure after chest wall resection, even after chemotherapy and arterial embolization.

Weekly paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate, and oral etoposide in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel, oral etoposide, and estramustine phosphate in the treatment of patients with advanced, hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma who had received no more than one previous chemotherapy regimen were eligible for this trial. Forty-two patients were treated between February 1998 and March 2000. Toxicity was excessive in the first 3 patients treated (Grade 3-4 leukopenia, 3 patients; death due to sepsis, 1 patient); the remaining 39 patients received lower doses of etoposide and estramustine phosphate (paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) as a 1-hour, intravenous infusion on Days 1, 8, 15; etoposide 50 mg orally twice daily on Days 1-10; and estramustine phosphate 280 mg orally 3 times daily on Days 1-10). Courses were repeated every 28 days. Patients were evaluated for objective and/or serologic response after two courses of treatment; responding patients continued treatment for six courses.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 40 evaluable patients (35%) had either an objective response or a serologic response to treatment. The median survival for the entire group was 9.5 months, with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates of 38%, 12%, and 10%, respectively. Neutropenia was the most common Grade 3-4 toxicity and occurred in 38% of patients (11% of courses). Thirteen patients (33%) had severe fatigue, and 2 patients had treatment-related deaths due to sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the three-drug combination had activity in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma, the results did not appear any better than the results achieved with less toxic taxane/estramustine phosphate combinations. Further development of this three-drug regimen is not recommended.

A Pilot Study of Dose Intense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Infusional Paclitaxel in High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer

We conducted a pilot study of dose dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) combination chemotherapy followed by infusional paclitaxel (T) in primary breast cancer to determine its safety and feasibility. Twenty-two subjects (10 with stage II and > or = 4 positive lymph nodes, and 12 with stage III disease) were treated with AC (A 60 mg/m2 and C 2000 mg/m2) with filgrastim every 14 days for three cycles followed by infusional paclitaxel (140 mg/m2 over 96 h) every 14 days for three cycles. Mean overall cycle length was 15.3 days and mean duration of therapy was 92 days. Dose reductions of C or T were required in 7/132 (5.3%) cycles for mucositis, diarrhea, or failure to recover platelets by day 15. Ninety-five percent of subjects had grade 4 neutropenia and 1 subject had a platelet nadir of < 20,000. Actual delivered dose intensity (DI) over six cycles was: A 27 mg/m2 per week; C 892 mg/m2 per week; T 64 mg/m2 per week (90.6, 89.2, and 91.4% of planned DI, respectively). Average total dose administered was: A 180 mg/m2; C 5880 mg/m2; T 403 mg/m2 (100, 98, and 96% of planned total doses, respectively). Clinical response rate in 10 subjects receiving neoadjuvant therapy was 100% (4 complete response, 6 partial response). Four subjects had a pathologic complete response (three subjects without evidence of malignancy and one subject with ductal carcinoma in situ.) Administration of dose dense AC followed by infusional paclitaxel in 14-day cycles is feasible and this regimen is active in breast cancer.

Weekly paclitaxel plus estramustine combination therapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel used in combination with estramustine has been shown to exert synergistic cytotoxicity in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). There have been few reports of this therapy in an Asian male population.

METHODS

Nine patients with progressive metastatic HRPC completed at least one cycle of combination therapy employing weekly paclitaxel plus estramustine. Paclitaxel was given weekly for 3 weeks as a 2-h intravenous infusion at a dose of 100 mg/infusion. The cycle was repeated every 4 weeks. A dose of 280 mg of oral estramustine was administrated twice daily for 21 days from the first day of each cycle. Both efficacy and toxicity were recorded.

RESULTS

Grade 1 sensory neuropathy was seen in three patients (33%) and grade 4 thrombopenia/anemia was seen in one patient (11%). Performance status improved in three of seven patients (43%), while six patients (67%) showed a 50% or greater decline in prostate-specific antigen levels. Two of these patients experienced significant improvement in bone pain. One patient died of cardiac infarction during this trial and another died of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy subsequent to gastrointestinal bleeding. An additional patient suffered non-fatal pulmonary infarction. The one-year median survival rate was 22.2% and the overall survival period was 36 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Although weekly paclitaxel plus estramustine may pose a significant risk, this combination may have a beneficial effect on the quality of life HRPC patients. A well-designed phase I-II trial in an Asian male population is highly recommended.

Weekly Paclitaxel Infusion as Salvage Therapy in Ovarian Cancer

The majority of women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer will have persistent or recurrent disease after initial treatment. We evaluated response and toxicity in women with advanced stage disease given salvage paclitaxel as a low-dose, weekly infusion. We performed a retrospective review of 22 women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian (19 women) or primary peritoneal carcinoma (3 women) who had received low-dose, weekly paclitaxel salvage therapy. All women had refractory, persistent, or recurrent disease following first-line treatment with paclitaxel and platin chemotherapy. Response and toxicity were assessed. Measurable disease present on physical or radiologic exam and serum carbohydrate antigen-125 levels were used to assess disease response. Overall response rate to low-dose, weekly paclitaxel salvage therapy was 50% (27% complete, 23% partial). Median progression-free interval (PFI) in responders was 27 weeks (range, 14-68 weeks). Stabilization of disease occurred in an additional 27% of patients with a median PFI of 22 weeks (range, 15-89 weeks). No difference in response was detected between the 7 women with platin-sensitive disease and the 15 women with platin-resistant disease (P = 0.19). The median dose of paclitaxel was 80 mg/m2 (range, 60-80 mg/m2). During a total of 325 weeks of paclitaxel treatment (median per patient, 12 weeks; range, 6-49 weeks), 13 treatment delays occurred (hematologic indication, 9; nonhematologic indication, 4). No cases of grade 4 hematologic toxicity, sepsis, or worsening neuropathy were documented. Weekly paclitaxel infusion given as salvage therapy results in significant clinical response, even in women previously treated with paclitaxel. The regimen is well tolerated with no cases of grade 4 neutropenia or worsening neuropathy in our population.

Weekly schedule of docetaxel in breast cancer: evaluation of response and toxicity

Several recent studies have investigated the administration of docetaxel on a weekly basis. Here, we review the weekly use of docetaxel in breast cancer. To identify articles published on this topic we performed a computer-assisted MEDLINE search; additional references were found in the bibliographies of these articles. Several phase Tstudies of weekly docetaxel have provided encouraging data indicating that there is generally less myelosuppression than with the three week schedule in patients with a variety of advanced malignancies. Dose-limiting toxicities are reached at 43 to 50 mg/m(2), and the recommended dose ranges from 36 to 42 mg/m(2). Furthermore, five studies of weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer achieved 32 to 41% response rates using 25 to 40 mg/m(2) of docetaxel. Myelosuppression was mild, but fatigue was common and was the most common reason for dose reduction. In general, the planned dose intensity was equivalent to those used in standard three week schedules, and fatigue, asthenia, nail changes, excessive lacrimation (tearing), and fluid retention became more common with prolonged administration of docetaxel. Thus, weekly scheduling of docetaxel maintains efficacy and alters the toxicity profile, and the use of weekly docetaxel will become a promising alternative to three week dosing in the treatment of advanced breast cancer once randomized controlled studies confirm these results. However, there is still much to learn about the role of weekly docetaxel in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy.

Continuation of trastuzumab beyond disease progression is feasible and safe in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 80 cases by the hellenic cooperative oncology group

Despite the widespread use of trastuzumab in the management of patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer, its optimal duration of administration is unknown. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 such patients who received trastuzumab monotherapy or combination chemotherapy beyond disease progression in order to register their clinical course. Median age of the patients was 54 years. Ninety-one percent had 3+ HER2 overexpression and 9% had 2+ HER2 overexpression. Fifty-six percent of patients had previously been treated with chemotherapy for advanced disease. The most commonly used combinations in first- and second-line treatments were trastuzumab with paclitaxel and trastuzumab with vinorelbine, respectively. In total, 32 responses were observed, most of them during the second or third line of treatment. Severe toxicities frequently seen (in = 5% of patients) were neutropenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (11.5%), infection (10%), peripheral neuropathy (9%), nausea/vomiting (6%), stomatitis (6%), diarrhea (6%), constipation (6%), edema (6%), and myalgias/arthralgias (5%). Median survival from diagnosis of advanced disease was 43.4 months (range, 6.4-91.7+), whereas median survival from disease progression after trastuzumab administration was 22.2 months (range, 0.01-32.9+). In conclusion, this retrospective analysis suggests that continuation of trastuzumab beyond disease progression in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer is feasible and safe. Randomized studies are warranted.

Treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

As a result of increasing anthracycline use earlier in the course of breast cancer, oncologists are frequently faced with the challenge of treating patients whose disease has progressed during or following anthracycline therapy or who are ineligible for further anthracycline therapy. Many of these women remain candidates for cytotoxic chemotherapy, and several treatment options exist. Until recently, the taxanes, docetaxel in particular, were widely regarded as the most effective therapy for these patients, based on a survival advantage observed with docetaxel. However, a recent phase III study demonstrated that the addition of capecitabine to docetaxel results in superior overall survival (with a 3-month improvement in median survival), superior time to disease progression, and a superior response rate, with a manageable safety profile. Capecitabine/docetaxel is the first cytotoxic combination to improve survival over standard monotherapy in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Moreover, the survival benefit can be attributed to the addition of capecitabine, as it was achieved despite the lower dose of docetaxel administered in the combination arm. Quality of life was maintained with capecitabine/docetaxel combination therapy, which further supports the use of this regimen in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Pharmacoeconomic modeling using the data from the phase III trial has shown that the capecitabine/docetaxel combination therapy is highly cost effective when compared with other cancer treatments that improve survival. This review describes several treatment options for patients with anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer, including the phase III data (efficacy, tolerability, quality of life, and pharmacoeconomics) for capecitabine plus docetaxel in this setting.

Weekly docetaxel as second-line therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to previous anthracycline treatment

This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel as treatment of advanced metastatic breast cancer patients resistant to prior anthracycline chemotherapy. After the first 18 patients, the initial dose (40 mg/m2, 30-min i.v. infusion for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2-week rest) was reduced to 36 mg/m2 in the remaining 17 patients due to the incidence of toxicity (28% grade 3-4 asthenia). Overall response rate was 34% (95% CI, 19-50): two complete (6%) and ten partial responses (28%) were found. The median duration of response was 6.8 months, the median time to disease progression was 8.4 months, and the median overall survival was 13.6 months (median follow-up of 11.4 months). Neutropenia was the only severe hematologic toxicity (17% of patients), whereas asthenia, nail, ocular and skin disorders were the most common nonhematologic toxicities. Only one death during further follow-up was related to toxicity (caused by pulmonary fibrosis). In conclusion, we found weekly docetaxel to be an active and safe chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast resistant to previous anthracyclines. This weekly regimen caused minimal myelosupression, while retaining significant activity against advanced breast cancer. Both factors provide attractive possibilities for the development of combination therapies incorporating weekly docetaxel. Nevertheless, the number of patients receiving either dose (40 and 36 mg/m2) which we studied is low and our results require confirmation on larger groups of patients.

Increased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although studies have focused on modulating the bioavailability of 5-FU through inhibition of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) to improve efficacy of the drug, activity of this enzyme in breast cancer has not been thoroughly examined. We measured DPD activity in primary and metastatic lesions and benign breast tumors to evaluate the clinical significance of this enzyme in the treatment of breast cancer.

METHODS

DPD activity was measured by catalytic assay and compared in 100 primary tumors (95 invasive carcinomas, 5 intraductal carcinomas), 26 uninvolved adjacent breast tissue specimens, 6 metastatic sites, and 7 intraductal papillomas.

RESULTS

The enzyme level in the carcinomas was 4-fold that of adjacent uninvolved breast tissues (101 vs 23 pmol/min/mg protein, P < 0.001). Enzyme activity in intraductal papilloma (120 pmol/min/mg protein) was comparable to that in invasive carcinoma. There were no significant differences in DPD activity related to clinicopathologic features, but a tendency toward increased DPD activity was observed in progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer (P = 0.09). There was marginal correlation in enzyme activity between primary and metastatic lesions (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

DPD activity is substantially upregulated in breast cancer tissue and is higher than that reported previously. The clinical implications of DPD inhibitors in patients being treated for breast cancer with oral fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy should be further investigated.