Venetoclax Combined With FLAG-IDA Induction and Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Translating recent advances in the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia to the clinic

Despite FDA approval of nine new drugs for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the United States over the last 4 years, AML remains a major area of unmet medical need among hematologic malignancies. In this review, we discuss the development of promising new molecular targeted approaches for AML, including menin inhibition, novel IDH1/2 inhibitors, and preclinical means to target TET2, ASXL1, and RNA splicing factor mutations. In addition, we review progress in immune targeting of AML through anti-CD47, anti-SIRPα, and anti-TIM-3 antibodies; bispecific and trispecific antibodies; and new cellular therapies in development for AML.

Venetoclax combination therapy in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor that was approved in combination therapy with hypomethylating agents or low dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The purpose of this review is to outline the most recent venetoclax-based combination therapies in newly diagnosed or relapsed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML patients.

RECENT FINDING

Venetoclax has been incorporated in various therapeutic regimens - either with chemotherapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapies. These combinations achieve high remission rates with deep molecular responses, as suggested by measurable residual disease measurements. There are concerns regarding the incomplete count recovery, prolonged cytopenia and infection rates, especially when combined with chemotherapy. There is also limited data concerning durability of these remissions, and the effectiveness in high-risk population (i.e. p53-mutated AML patients).

SUMMARY

Venetoclax-based combination therapies encompass novel therapeutic possibilities in MDS and AML with encouraging initial results. However, the exact role of each combination therapy and the long-term effects on patients' outcome are yet to be defined.

Central Nervous System Involvement in Adults with Acute Leukemia: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent treatment advances in both acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia have drastically improved outcomes for these diseases, but central nervous system (CNS) relapses still occur. Treatment of CNS disease can be challenging due to the impermeability of the blood-brain barrier to many systemic therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of CNS leukemia relies on assessment of clinical symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid sampling for conventional cytology and/or flow cytometry, and neuroimaging. While treatment of CNS leukemia with systemic or intrathecal chemotherapy and/or radiation can be curative in some patients, these modalities can also lead to serious toxicities. In the modern era, prophylaxis with intrathecal chemotherapy is the most important strategy to prevent CNS relapses in high risk patients. Accurate risk stratification tools and the use of risk-adapted prophylactic therapy are imperative to improving the outcomes of patients with acute leukemias and preventing the development of CNS leukemia.

Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Background

Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible.

Methods and patients

Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC).

Results

After a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1–22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2–20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8–24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5–22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10–22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 – 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9–4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8–24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89–22.13, p = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5–24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8–22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 – 1.21, p = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 – 436.2, p < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Detailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT.

Impact of frontline treatment approach on outcomes in patients with secondary AML with prior hypomethylating agent exposure

BACKGROUND

Treated secondary acute myeloid leukemia (ts-AML)-i.e., AML arising from a previously treated antecedent hematologic disorder-is associated with very poor outcomes. The optimal frontline treatment regimen for these patients is uncertain.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 562 patients who developed AML from preceding myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia for which they had received a hypomethylating agent (HMA). Patients with ts-AML were stratified by frontline AML treatment with intensive chemotherapy (IC, n = 271), low-intensity therapy (LIT) without venetoclax (n = 237), or HMA plus venetoclax (n = 54).

RESULTS

Compared with IC or LIT without venetoclax, HMA plus venetoclax resulted in higher CR/CRi rates (39% and 25%, respectively; P = 0.02) and superior OS (1-year OS 34% and 17%, respectively; P = 0.05). The benefit of HMA plus venetoclax was restricted to patients with non-adverse risk karyotype, where HMA plus venetoclax resulted in a median OS of 13.7 months and 1-year OS rate of 54%; in contrast, for patients with adverse risk karyotype, OS was similarly dismal regardless of treatment approach (median OS 3-5 months). A propensity score analysis accounting for relevant clinical variables confirmed the significant OS benefit of HMA plus venetoclax, as compared with other frontline treatment approaches. In a landmark analysis, patients with ts-AML who underwent subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) had superior 3-year OS compared to non-transplanted patients (33% vs. 8%, respectively; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of ts-AML are poor but may be improved with use of an HMA plus venetoclax-based regimen, followed by HSCT, particularly in those with a non-adverse risk karyotype.

The Elephant in The Room: AML Relapse Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is an unfavorable event associated with a poor prognosis, particularly for patients with early relapses. It usually arises from resistant leukemic blasts that escaped both preparative chemotherapy regimen and the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Independent from the choice of salvage treatment, only minority of patients can achieve durable remissions. In recent years, better understanding of the disease relapse biology post allo-HCT allowed the application of newer strategies that could induce higher rates of remission, and potential longer survival. Those strategies aim at optimizing drugs that have a direct anti-leukemia activity by targeting different oncogenic mutations, metabolism pathways or surface antigens, and concurrently enhancing the immune microenvironment to promote GVL effect. This review discusses the current treatment landscape of AML relapse post allo-HCT.

Benefit of high-dose idarubicin as induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: a prospective phase 2 study

Idarubicin 12 mg/m² has been recommended as a standard induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It is unknown whether a higher dose of idarubicin can improve the remission rate. This phase 2 prospective single-arm study enrolled 45 adults with newly diagnosed AML between September 2019 and May 2021 (NCT 04,069,208). Induction therapy included administration of idarubicin 14 mg/m² for 3 days and cytarabine 100 mg/m² every 12 h subcutaneously for 7 days. The primary endpoint was the composite complete response rate (complete response (CR) plus complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi)). The median age was 45 years (range 14-60 years). Forty (88.9%) patients had CR or CRi, including 39 patients with CR and 1 patient with CRi after one course of induction therapy. The median times to recovery of absolute neutrophil and platelet counts were 21 days. Only 1 patient died of intracranial hemorrhage during induction therapy. After a median follow-up of 14 months (range 3.5-24 months), the estimated 18-month overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were 66.9% and 57.5%, respectively. In conclusion, idarubicin 14 mg/m² plus cytarabine was a safe and efficient intensive regimen for younger and fit patients with newly diagnosed AML.

The cure of leukemia through the optimist's prism

Progress is occurring at a dizzying rate across all leukemias. Since the authors' review of the topic in Cancer in 2018, numerous discoveries have been made that have improved the therapy and outcomes of several leukemia subsets. Hairy cell leukemia is potentially curable with a single course of cladribine followed by rituximab (10-year survival, ≥90%). Acute promyelocytic leukemia is curable at a rate of 80% to 90% with a nonchemotherapy regimen of all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide. The cure rate for core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is ≥75% with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Survival for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is close to that for an age-matched normal population with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, a previously incurable disease, may now be potentially curable with a finite duration of therapy with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and venetoclax. The estimated 5-year survival rate for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) exceeds 70% with intensive chemotherapy and ponatinib, a third-generation BCR-ABL1 TKI, and more recent nonchemotherapy regimens using dasatinib or ponatinib with blinatumomab are producing outstanding results. Survival in both younger and older patients with ALL has improved with the addition of antibodies targeting CD20, CD19 (blinatumomab), and CD22 (inotuzumab) to chemotherapy. Several recent drug discoveries (venetoclax, FLT3 and IDH inhibitors, and oral hypomethylating agents) are also improving outcomes for younger and older patients with AML and for those with higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Prediction of early (4-week) mortality in acute myeloid leukemia with intensive chemotherapy

The progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Given the recent development of effective low intensity therapies, an optimal decision on the therapy intensity may improve survival through the avoidance of early mortality. We reviewed the outcome of 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML who received intensive chemotherapy between August 1980 and May 2020. Intensive chemotherapy was defined as a cumulative cytarabine dose ≥ 700 mg/m² during induction therapy. We divided the whole cohort into a training and validation group at a 3:1 ratio. The population was divided into a training (2790 patients) and a validation cohort (938 patients). The median age was 55 years (range, 15-99). Among them, 442 patients (12%) had core-binding factor AML. Binary logistic regression identified older age, worse performance status, hyperbilirubinemia, elevated creatinine, hyperuricemia, cytogenetic abnormalities other than CBF and -Y, and pneumonia as adverse prognostic factors for an early 4-week mortality. This risk classification for early mortality was verified in the validation cohort of patients. In the validation cohort of more recently treated patients from 2000 to 2017, the 4-week mortality rates with intensive chemotherapy were 2%, 14%, and 50% in the low-, high-, and very high-risk group, respectively. The mortality rates with low intensity therapies were 3%, 9%, and 20%, respectively. The risk classification guides treatment intensity by the assessment of age, frailty, organ dysfunction, cytogenetic abnormality, and infection to avoid early mortality.

How We Incorporate Venetoclax in Treatment Regimens for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

ABSTRACT

Venetoclax has transformed the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Hypomethylating agents with venetoclax (HMA-VEN) have significantly improved outcomes and have become the standard therapy for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML and are comparable to intensive chemotherapy in salvage setting. Venetoclax with intensive chemotherapy have shown high response rates in both frontline and salvage setting in younger patients, and triplet combinations with HMA-VEN and FLT3 inhibitors have shown encouraging results in FLT3mut AML. While patients with NPM1mut, IDH1/2mut experience favorable outcomes, those with TP53mut and secondary AML may experience minimal benefit from the addition of venetoclax. Despite improved outcomes, severe cytopenias and infectious complications are common with venetoclax-based regimens. Early response evaluation, dose reductions, venetoclax interruptions, use of growth factors, and prophylactic antimicrobials may minimize such myelosuppression and risk of infections. Outcomes after failure of frontline HMA-VEN are dismal, and novel approaches are needed to abrogate primary and acquired resistance.

The manipulation of apoptosis for cancer therapy using BH3-mimetic drugs

Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death that is regulated by the balance between prosurvival and proapoptotic BCL-2 protein family members. Evasion of apoptosis is a hallmark of cancer that arises when this balance is tipped in favour of survival. One form of anticancer therapeutic, termed 'BH3-mimetic drugs', has been developed to directly activate the apoptosis machinery in malignant cells. These drugs bind to and inhibit specific prosurvival BCL-2 family proteins, thereby mimicking their interaction with the BH3 domains of proapoptotic BCL-2 family proteins. The BCL-2-specific inhibitor venetoclax is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and many regulatory authorities worldwide for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and acute myeloid leukaemia. BH3-mimetic drugs targeting other BCL-2 prosurvival proteins have been tested in preclinical models of cancer, and drugs targeting MCL-1 or BCL-X_L have advanced into phase I clinical trials for certain cancers. As with all therapeutics, efficacy and tolerability need to be carefully balanced to achieve a therapeutic window whereby there is significant anticancer activity with an acceptable safety profile. In this Review, we outline the current state of BH3-mimetic drugs targeting various prosurvival BCL-2 family proteins and discuss emerging data regarding primary and acquired resistance to these agents and approaches that may overcome this. We highlight issues that need to be addressed to further advance the clinical application of BH3-mimetic drugs, both alone and in combination with additional anticancer agents (for example, standard chemotherapeutic drugs or inhibitors of oncogenic kinases), for improved responses in patients with cancer.

Adding venetoclax to fludarabine/busulfan RIC transplant for high-risk MDS and AML is feasible, safe, and active

Adding the selective BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax to reduced-intensity conditioning chemotherapy (fludarabine and busulfan [FluBu2]) may enhance antileukemic cytotoxicity and thereby reduce the risk of posttransplant relapse. This phase 1 study investigated the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of venetoclax, a BCL-2 selective inhibitor, when added to FluBu2 in adult patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) undergoing transplant. Patients received dose-escalated venetoclax (200-400 mg daily starting day -8 for 6-7 doses) in combination with fludarabine 30 mg/m2 per day for 4 doses and busulfan 0.8 mg/kg twice daily for 8 doses on day -5 to day -2 (FluBu2). Transplant related-toxicity was evaluated from the first venetoclax dose on day -8 to day 28. Twenty-two patients were treated. At study entry, 5 patients with MDS and MDS/MPN had 5% to 10% marrow blasts, and 18 (82%) of 22 had a persistent detectable mutation. Grade 3 adverse events included mucositis, diarrhea, and liver transaminitis (n = 3 each). Neutrophil/platelet recovery and acute/chronic graft-versus-host-disease rates were similar to those of standard FluBu2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The RP2D of venetoclax was 400 mg daily for 7 doses. With a median follow-up of 14.7 months (range, 8.6-24.8 months), median overall survival was not reached, and progression-free survival was 12.2 months (95% confidence interval, 6.0-not estimable). In patients with high-risk AML, MDS, and MDS/MPN, adding venetoclax to FluBu2 was feasible and safe. To further address relapse risk, assessment of maintenance therapy after venetoclax plus FluBu2 transplant is ongoing. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03613532.

Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Are Supporting Evidences Enough?

Simple Summary

Venetoclax (VEN) is a potent oral inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic molecule BCL2, approved for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and recently for naïve acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Therefore, VEN is not approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients; consequently, this use falls within the so-called off-label use. This review provides evidence of the role of VEN-based therapy in R/R AML patients, including data from clinical trials and from retrospective studies.

Abstract

Despite the progress in the development of new therapeutic strategies, relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still represents a high unmet medical need. Treatment options in this setting include enrollment into clinical trials, allogeneic stem cell transplantation and/or targeted therapy. Nevertheless, it is associated with poor outcomes. Thus, the development of new treatments, which could ameliorate the prognosis of these patients with a good safety profile are highly demanded. Recently, venetoclax (VEN) has been approved for naïve AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. In this regard, regimens including VEN could represent a valuable treatment option even in those with R/R disease and several studies have been conducted to demonstrate its role in this clinical setting. This review aims to summarize the current evidence on the use of VEN regimens in the treatment of R/R AML.

European LeukemiaNet 2017 risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia: validation in a risk-adapted protocol

The ELN 2017 classification has been validated in a risk-adapted intensive protocol, supporting its utility to predict outcome.

Within the ELN 2017 adverse group, there is a subset of patients (inv(3) and TP53 abnormalities) with a particularly poor prognosis.

The 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN 2017) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have become fundamental guidelines to assess the prognosis and postremission therapy of patients. However, they have been retrospectively validated in few studies with patients included in different treatment protocols. We analyzed 861 patients included in the Cooperativo Para el Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias-12 risk-adapted protocol, which indicates cytarabine-based consolidation for patients allocated to the ELN 2017 favorable-risk group, whereas it recommends allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) as a postremission strategy for the ELN 2017 intermediate- and adverse-risk groups. We retrospectively classified patients according to the ELN 2017, with 327 (48%), 109 (16%), and 245 (36%) patients allocated to the favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk group, respectively. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 77% and 70% for favorable-risk patients, 52% and 46% for intermediate-risk patients, and 33% and 23% for adverse-risk patients, respectively. Furthermore, we identified a subgroup of patients within the adverse group (inv(3)/t(3;3), complex karyotype, and/or TP53 mutation/17p abnormality) with a particularly poor outcome, with a 2-year OS of 15%. Our study validates the ELN 2017 risk stratification in a large cohort of patients treated with an ELN-2017 risk-adapted protocol based on alloSCT after remission for nonfavorable ELN subgroups and identifies a genetic subset with a very poor outcome that warrants investigation of novel strategies.

Harnessing the benefits of available targeted therapies in acute myeloid leukaemia

Research has resulted in regulatory approval of nine agents for acute myeloid leukaemia indications by the US Food and Drug Administration since 2017: the Bcl-2 inhibitor, venetoclax; two FLT3 inhibitors, midostaurin and gilteritinib; two IDH inhibitors, ivosidenib (IDH1 inhibitor) and enasidenib (IDH2 inhibitor); the anti-CD33 antibody-drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin; the oral, poorly absorbable hypomethylating agent, azacitidine; the liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin (5:1 ratio), CPX-351; and the hedgehog signalling pathway inhibitor, glasdegib. A 100% absorbable oral formulation of the hypomethylating agent decitabine was approved for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia, and might be used as an alternative to parenteral hypomethylating agents. Several of the approvals are as single-agent therapies or in specific combinations for narrow indications, thus offering poor treatment value. In this Review, we discuss ongoing research into combinations containing these commercially available targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia.

Keeping up with venetoclax for leukemic malignancies: key findings, optimal regimens and clinical considerations

INTRODUCTION

Venetoclax has transformed the treatment landscape in hematologic malignancies, especially in elderly population. With high rates of remission, deep and durable responses, and safe toxicity profile, venetoclax in combination therapy has been extremely effective, garnering accelerated approval and becoming standard of care in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies.

AREAS COVERED

The role of venetoclax in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway is covered. This includes preclinical and clinical experience of venetoclax monotherapy and combination therapy in relapsed/refractory and frontline CLL, AML, ALL and high-risk MDS, with an emphasis on key clinical trials and efficacy of combination regimens in distinct mutational landscapes. Strategies to mitigate myelosuppression, manage dose adjustments and infectious complications are addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

Targeting BCL-2 offers a safe and highly effective adjunct to available therapies in hematologic malignancies. Despite success and frequent utilization of venetoclax, several resistance mechanisms have been elucidated, prompting development of novel combinatorial strategies. Further, on-target myelosuppression of venetoclax is a key obstacle in clinical practice, requiring diligent monitoring and practice-based knowledge of dose modifications. Despite these limitations, venetoclax has gained tremendous popularity in hematologic-oncology, becoming an integral component of numerous combination regimes, with ongoing plethora of clinical trials encompassing standard chemotherapy, targeted agents and immune-based approaches.

Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Therapies, Challenges and Future Prospective

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT), an alternative donor source, offers a curative therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are transplant candidates. Advances in transplantation techniques, such as donor selection, conditioning regimen modification, and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, have successfully improved the outcomes of AML patients receiving haplo-SCT and extended the haploidentical transplant indictions for AML. Presently, treating de novo AML, secondary AML, therapy-related AML and refractory and relapsed AML with haplo-SCT can achieve comparable outcomes to those of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT), unrelated donor transplantation or umbilical cord blood transplantation. For some subgroups of AML subjects, such as patients with positive pretransplantation minimal/measurable residual disease, recent studies suggest that haplo-SCT might be superior to MSDT in decreasing relapse and improving survival. Unfortunately, for patients with AML after haplo-SCT, relapse and infections remain the causes of death that restrict further improvement in clinical outcomes. In this review, we discuss the recent advances and challenges in haplo-SCT for AML treatment, mainly focusing on unmanipulated haplo-SCT protocols. We provide an outlook on future prospects and suggest that relapse prophylaxis, intervention, and treatment, as well as infection prevention and therapy, are areas of active research in AML patients who receive haploidentical allografts.

Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Treatment Options and Future Perspectives

Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has improved in recent years and several new therapeutic options have been approved. Most of them include mutation-specific approaches (e.g., gilteritinib for AML patients with activating FLT3 mutations), or are restricted to such defined AML subgroups, such as AML-MRC (AML with myeloid-related changes) or therapy-related AML (CPX-351). With this review, we aim to present a comprehensive overview of current AML therapy according to the evolved spectrum of recently approved treatment strategies. We address several aspects of combined epigenetic therapy with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax and provide insight into mechanisms of resistance towards venetoclax-based regimens, and how primary or secondary resistance might be circumvented. Furthermore, a detailed overview on the current status of AML immunotherapy, describing promising concepts, is provided. This review focuses on clinically important aspects of current and future concepts of AML treatment, but will also present the molecular background of distinct targeted therapies, to understand the development and challenges of clinical trials ongoing in AML patients.

Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Molecular Basis, Evidences for Preclinical and Clinical Efficacy and Strategies to Target Resistance

Venetoclax is a BH3-mimetics agent specifically interacting with the antiapoptotic protein BCL-2, facilitating cytochrome c release from mitochondria, subsequent caspases activation, and cell death. Utilization of venetoclax has profoundly changed the landscape of treatment for the poor-prognosis category of AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. In the phase III VIALE-A study, Venetoclax, in combination with the hypomethylating agent azacitidine, showed a 65% overall response rate and 14.7-month overall survival, in comparison with 22% and 8 months in the control arm. These results led to the widespread use of venetoclax in this indication. Other combination regimens, consisting of low-intensity, intensive, or targeted therapies are currently under evaluation. Despite promising results, preventing relapses or resistance to venetoclax is still an unmet clinical need. Numerous studies have been conducted to identify and overcome venetoclax resistance in preclinical models or in clinical trials, including the inhibition of other antiapoptotic proteins, the induction of proapoptotic BH3-only proteins, and/or the targeting of the mitochondrial metabolism and machinery.

Evolving Therapeutic Approaches for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in 2021

Simple Summary

The better understanding of disease biology, the availability of new effective drugs and the increased awareness of patients’ heterogeneity in terms of fitness and personal expectations has made the current treatment paradigm of AML in the elderly very challenging. Here, we discuss the evolving criteria used to define eligibility for induction chemotherapy and transplantation, the introduction of new agents in the treatment of patients with very different clinical conditions, the implications of precision medicine and the importance of quality of life and supportive care, proposing a simplified algorithm that we follow in 2021.

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients is characterized by unfavorable prognosis due to adverse disease features and a high rate of treatment-related complications. Classical therapeutic options range from intensive chemotherapy in fit patients, potentially followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), to hypomethylating agents or palliative care alone for unfit/frail ones. In the era of precision medicine, the treatment paradigm of AML is rapidly changing. On the one hand, a plethora of new targeted drugs with good tolerability profiles are becoming available, offering the possibility to achieve a prolonged remission to many patients not otherwise eligible for more intensive therapies. On the other hand, better tools to assess patients’ fitness and improvements in the selection and management of those undergoing allo-HCT will hopefully reduce treatment-related mortality and complications. Importantly, a detailed genetic characterization of AML has become of paramount importance to choose the best therapeutic option in both intensively treated and unfit patients. Finally, improving supportive care and quality of life is of major importance in this age group, especially for the minority of patients that are still candidates for palliative care because of very poor clinical conditions or unwillingness to receive active treatments. In the present review, we discuss the evolving approaches in the treatment of older AML patients, which is becoming increasingly challenging following the advent of new effective drugs for a very heterogeneous and complex population.

Outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia treated with Mito-FLAG salvage chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Curative intended treatment is challenging in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (r/r AML) and associated with a dismal prognosis for long-term survival. Despite novel treatment options, the majority of patients are treated with chemotherapy-based regimens. Although widely used, little data exist on the combination of fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (FLAG) and mitoxantrone as salvage strategy for r/r AML.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-six patients receiving Mito-FLAG for r/r AML treated at a German tertiary care center between 2009 and 2019 were analyzed with regard to response rates, survival and safety profile.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 75.8% with 56.1% of patients achieving complete remission (CR) and 19.7% partial remission (PR). After a median follow-up of 54 months, median overall survival (OS) was 13 months. Patients transitioned to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) (75.8%) showed a significant improvement in OS with a median OS of 17 (95% CI 8.5-25.4) months vs 3 (95% CI 1.7-4.3) months (p < 0.001). 30- and 60-day mortality rates for all patients after the initial cycle of Mito-FLAG were 4.5% and 7.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Mito-FLAG salvage protocol represents an effective and feasible treatment regimen for r/r AML. Importantly, a high rate of transition to successful alloHSCT with the aim of long-term disease-free survival has been shown.

Updates on targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia

In the past few years research in the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has led to remarkable advances in our understanding of the disease. Cytogenetic and molecular aberrations are the most important factors in determining response to chemotherapy as well as long-term outcome, but beyond prognostication are potential therapeutic targets. Our increased understanding of the pathogenesis of AML facilitated by next-generation sequencing has spurred the development of new compounds in the treatment of AML, particularly the creation of small molecules that target the disease on a molecular level. Many of the hopeful predictions outlined in our AML review of 2018 are now therapeutic realities: gemtuzumab ozogamicin, venetoclax, FLT3 inhibitors (midostaurin, gilteritinib), IDH inhibitors (ivosidenib, enasidenib), CPX-351, glasdegib, oral decitabine, and oral azacitidine. Others may soon be (quizartinib, APR246 magrolimab, menin inhibitors). The wealth of positive data allows reconsideration of what might soon be new standards of care in younger and older patients with AML. In this review we give an overview of recently approved therapies in AML and address present and future research directions.

Ten-day decitabine with venetoclax versus intensive chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has poor outcomes. Although lower-intensity venetoclax-containing regimens are standard for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML, it is unknown how such regimens compare with intensive chemotherapy (IC) for R/R AML.

METHODS

Outcomes of R/R AML treated with 10-day decitabine and venetoclax (DEC10-VEN) were compared with IC-based regimens including idarubicin with cytarabine, with or without cladribine, clofarabine, or fludarabine, with or without additional agents. Propensity scores derived from patient baseline characteristics were used to match DEC10-VEN and IC patients to minimize bias.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients in the DEC10-VEN cohort were matched to 130 IC recipients. The median ages for the DEC10-VEN and IC groups were 64 and 58 years, respectively, and baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 cohorts. DEC10-VEN conferred significantly higher responses compared with IC including higher overall response rate (60% vs 36%; odds ratio [OR], 3.28; P < .001), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi, 19% vs 6%; OR, 3.56; P = .012), minimal residual disease negativity by flow cytometry (28% vs 13%; OR, 2.48; P = .017), and lower rates of refractory disease. DEC10-VEN led to significantly longer median event-free survival compared with IC (5.7 vs 1.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.70; P < .001), as well as median overall survival (OS; 6.8 vs 4.7 months; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.86; P = .008). DEC10-VEN was independently associated with improved OS compared with IC in multivariate analysis. Exploratory analysis for OS in 27 subgroups showed that DEC10-VEN was comparable with IC as salvage therapy for R/R AML.

CONCLUSION

DEC10-VEN represents an appropriate salvage therapy and may offer better responses and survival compared with IC in adults with R/R AML.

Venetoclax-based salvage therapy followed by Venetoclax and DLI maintenance vs. FLAG-Ida for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of 20 patients receiving Venetoclax + low-dose Cytarabine + Actinomycin D (ACTIVE) with 29 patients receiving FLAG-Ida as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory AML (R/R AML) after alloSCT. The groups were statistically balanced according to age, performance status, cytogenetics, and previous treatment. The overall response rate (CR + CRp + MLFS) of ACTIVE was 75% (15/20) in comparison to 66% (19/29) in the FLAG-Ida group (p = 0.542). The cumulative CR + CRp rate was significantly higher in the ACTIVE group compared to FLAG-Ida (70% (14/20) vs. 34% (10/29), respectively, p = 0.02). All three patients failing previous Venetoclax therapy and five out of seven patients with previous FLAG-Ida exposure achieved a CR/CRp after ACTIVE induction. ACTIVE patients survived longer compared to FLAG-Ida patients (13.1 vs. 5.1 months, respectively, p = 0.032). The treatment-related mortality was 0% in the ACTIVE group and 34% (10/29) in the FLAG-Ida patients (p = 0.003). The cumulative incidence of relapse did not differ between the two treatment groups. ACTIVE appears to have comparable antileukemic activity and lower toxicity compared to FLAG-Ida resulting in improved survival. Patients with Venetoclax or FLAG-Ida exposure responded to ACTIVE.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Historical Perspective and Progress in Research and Therapy Over 5 Decades

With the Food and Drug Administration approval of 9 agents for different acute myeloid leukemia (AML) indications, the prognosis and management of AML is evolving rapidly. Herein, we review the important milestones in the history of AML research and therapy, discuss insights regarding prognostic assessment and prediction of treatment outcome, detail practical supportive care measures, and summarize the current treatment landscape and areas of evolving research.