Living with treatment decisions: regrets and quality of life among men treated for metastatic prostate cancer

A matter of trust--patient's views on decision-making in colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine which aspects of the treatment decision process, therapy and outcomes are most important to patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 102 men and 73 women who had completed primary treatment for CRC in two teaching hospitals in Central Sydney, Australia.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Patient's rating of the importance of the decision-making aspects and outcomes of treatment for CRC.

RESULTS

Trust in their surgeon and confidence of specialty training are of paramount importance to CRC patients. Patients also have a strong desire to get on with treatment quickly and rate the risk of disease recurrence and quality of life as being very important in their treatment decisions. Gender, age and whether the patient had undergone adjuvant radiotherapy were all significant predictors of preferred mode of treatment decision-making. Fifty-eight per cent of women preferred a shared decision-making role compared with 36% of men, whilst older patients and those who had undergone adjuvant radiotherapy were significantly more likely to prefer that their surgeon decide upon treatment when compared with younger patients and respondents who have not had radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of whether a patient prefers an active or more passive role in decision-making, having a surgeon explain treatment options in a clear, unhurried and open manner is vital to how patients feel about their treatment. Whilst acknowledging that individual patients will have different needs for information and preferences for treatment, there are several factors amongst many in the process of decision-making which are considered very important by patients with CRC. A surgeon who adopts a consultation style that is open and informative, that offers patients the chance to participate in the process of decision-making and clearly explain treatment options and outcomes will engender trust with their patient.

Avoidance of anticipated regret: the ordering of prostate-specific antigen tests

OBJECTIVE

When making decisions, people are known to try to minimize the regret that would be provoked by unwanted consequences of these decisions. The authors explored the strength and determinants of such anticipated regret in a study of physicians' decisions to order prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests.

METHODS

32 US and 33 French primary care physicians indicated the likelihood they would order a PSA for 32 hypothetical men presenting for routine physical exams. They then indicated how much regret they would feel if they found advanced prostate cancer in 12 other patients for whom they had chosen not to order PSAs several years before. The latter patients differed according to age (55, 65, or 75 years), a prior request or not for PSA testing, and no or some irregularity of the prostate on the earlier rectal exam.

RESULTS

ANOVA found that regret was higher when the patient had requested a PSA, the prostate was irregular, and the patient was younger. Shape had less effect when the patient had requested a PSA. US physicians had more regret than the French, patient request had a greater impact on the Americans, and increasing patient age reduced regret more among the French. In a 1-way correlation, the regret score was associated with the likelihood of ordering PSAs for both the French (r = 0.64, P < 0.005) and the Americans (r = 0.42, P< 0.02). In a regression analysis too, the regret score was the most important predictor of the likelihood of ordering a PSA (beta = 0.37, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Regret over failing to diagnose aggressive prostate cancer is associated with a policy of ordering PSAs. This regret appears to be culturally sensitive.

Prostate cancer: men's health and their prostate

This study aimed to describe men's knowledge of prostate cancer and the factors associated with these knowledge levels at selected regions in Western Sydney. The study was a descriptive, quantitative design using a postal survey of men over 40 years of age. A questionnaire consisting of 19 items that addressed areas of knowledge related to prostate cancer was used. The men in this study needed more information about risk factors for prostate cancer, screening techniques and treatment regimens and their side effects. This study has shown that if men are to make informed decisions about prostate cancer screening, it is important to have some form of decision aid on prostate cancer screening available to them.

Brief assessment of priority symptoms in hormone refractory prostate cancer: the FACT Advanced Prostate Symptom Index (FAPSI)

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to construct and validate a brief, clinically-relevant symptom index for advanced prostate cancer.

METHODS

Questions were extracted from a commonly-used multi-dimensional cancer quality of life instrument with prostate-specific items, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P). Surveys of disease-related symptoms were presented to an international sample of 44 expert physicians. Each expert narrowed the list to no more than five of the most important symptoms or concerns to monitor when assessing the value of treatment for advanced prostate cancer. Symptoms/concerns endorsed at a frequency greater than chance probability (17%) were retained for the symptom index and called the FACT Advanced Prostate Symptom Index-8 (FAPSI-8): pain (three items), fatigue, weight loss, urinary difficulties (two items), and concern about the condition becoming worse. The FAPSI-8 was validated using data from a clinical trial of 288 men being treated for hormone refractory prostate cancer.

RESULTS

The FAPSI-8 showed good internal consistency (r = 0.67-0.80); association with existing FACT scales (e.g., FACT-P, Physical Well-being, Functional Well-being; r = 0.44-0.85, p <.0001), responsiveness to clinical change (Guyatt's Responsiveness statistic = 1.29), and ability to differentiate patients by performance status (p <.0001). A six-item alternate version of the FAPSI was also evaluated with comparable results.

CONCLUSIONS

This project produced a reliable and valid list of the eight most important clinician-rated targets of drug therapy for advanced prostate cancer. These questions perform comparably to the longer derivative questionnaire. Examination of patient agreement with this priority list and the extent to which changes in these 8 targets are related to meaningful clinical benefit to the patient are important next steps for future research.

Validation of a decision regret scale

BACKGROUND

As patients become more involved in health care decisions, there may be greater opportunity for decision regret. The authors could not find a validated, reliable tool for measuring regret after health care decisions.

METHODS

A 5-item scale was administered to 4 patient groups making different health care decisions. Convergent validity was determined by examining the scale's correlation with satisfaction measures, decisional conflict, and health outcome measures.

RESULTS

The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 to 0.92). It correlated strongly with decision satisfaction (r = -0.40 to -0.60), decisional conflict (r = 0.31 to 0.52), and overall rated quality of life (r = -0.25 to -0.27). Groups differing on feelings about a decision also differed on rated regret: F(2, 190) = 31.1, P < 0.001. Regret was greater among those who changed their decisions than those who did not, t(175) = 16.11, P < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale is a useful indicator of health care decision regret at a given point in time.

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) after initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard mode of therapy for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Controversy exists, however, as to the optimal timing of initiation of ADT, as well as whether this form of therapy imparts a survival benefit to patients with advanced disease. Side effects of ADT are not minimal and can seriously compromise a patient's quality of life. Additionally, ADT eventually results in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Despite new chemotherapeutic regimens and hormonal agents, overall survival in these patients remains universally low. Nonetheless, it is valuable to gauge a patient's prognosis to assist in decision making when considering treatment options. Contemporary series analyzing patients with HRPC have identified several factors prognostic of survival outcomes, such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALK), hemoglobin (Hgb), and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level. Nomograms have been developed that utilize these pretreatment clinical variables to predict clinical outcomes, including 1-year, 2-year, and median survival times in patients with HRPC. These instruments are capable of more accurately predicting survival outcomes than traditional tables of multivariate results or simple analysis of prognostic factors. We believe these nomograms will become indispensable tools for patient counseling and clinical trial design in patients with HRPC.

Regret in men treated for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We identify the predictors of medical regret in men treated for localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients previously treated for early stage prostate cancer were assessed for treatment regret using validated items. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified associations between regret and demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, medical knowledge, and general and disease specific health related quality of life as measured by the general health perceptions domain of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and a validated short form of the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index.

RESULTS

Of 96 respondents (mean age 64 years, mean followup 2.8 years) 16% expressed regret with treatment decisions. Regretful men were almost twice as likely as nonregretful men to have less than a college education (60% versus 33%, p = 0.05) and worse current health related quality of life (p <0.05). In addition, regretful men tended to be unable to recall the most recent prostate specific antigen accurately (p = 0.06). Men with and without regret did not differ in other demographic characteristics, treatment choice or clinical outcomes. Regretful men were more likely to say they would choose a different treatment if they could. In multivariate analyses worse quality of life predicted regret but decline in quality of life with time was not associated with regret.

CONCLUSIONS

Men expressing regret over treatment choice for localized prostate cancer have poorer health related quality of life. Further study is needed to identify factors that predict posttreatment regret. Such information will allow patients and physicians to individualize treatment decisions, optimize quality of life and avoid medical regret.

Pharmacokinetics of novel inhibitors of androgen synthesis after intravenous administration in mice

PURPOSE

The pharmacokinetics of several new androgen synthesis inhibitors were investigated after intravenous administration in mice. The inhibitors were: 3beta-hydroxy-17-(1 H-imidazol-1-yl)androsta-5,16-diene (VN/85-1), 3beta-hydroxy-17-(1 H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)androsta-5,16-diene (VN/87-1), 17-(1 H-imidazol-1-yl)androsta-4,16-diene-3-one (VN/108-1) and 17-(5'-isoxazolyl)androsta-4,16-dien-3-one (L-39).

METHODS

Male Balb/c mice were injected with VN/85-1, VN/87-1, VN/108-1 or L-39 at 10, 25 and 50 mg/kg doses. Blood was collected at various times after drug administration via the eye orbit. The concentrations of VN/85-1, VN/87-1, VN/108-1 or L-39 in plasma were analyzed by a reversed-phase HPLC method with UV detection.

RESULTS

The plasma levels of VN/85-1, VN/87-1, VN/108-1 and L-39 declined biexponentially with terminal elimination half-lives ranging from 0.88 to 1.77 h. The terminal half-lives for VN/87-1, VN/85-1 and VN/108-1 were similar. However, the terminal half-life for L-39 was significantly longer than those for VN/87-1, VN/85-1 and VN/108-1. The systemic clearance values for the steroids ranged from 0.85 to 10.91 l/h per kg with a rank order of their clearance of L-39>VN/87-1>VN/108-1>VN/85-1. The apparent volumes of distribution at steady state for the steroids ranged from 0.58 to 18.85 l/kg with a rank order of their apparent V(ss) of L-39>VN/87-1>VN/85-1>VN/108-1. The clearance and apparent V(ss) for all four compounds were dose-independent following intravenous administration of doses up to 50 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

VN/85-1, VN/87-1, VN/108-1 and L-39 are rapidly cleared from the systemic circulation and display linear pharmacokinetics in mice. The information presented may be used to improve the disposition profiles and activities of the steroidal inhibitors of androgen synthesis in animal models of prostate cancer.

Health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Quality of life is of great concern to patients considering treatment options for prostate cancer. In the absence of clinical trial data clearly demonstrating that a particular treatment is superior to another for localized prostate cancer, in terms of cause specific survival, patients may value quality of life as much as quantity of life. The goal of this review is to familiarize the reader with the methodology of quality of life research and to review the recent literature on quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A structured MEDLINE review of literature on health related quality of life in prostate cancer for the years 1995 to 2001 was performed, and was augmented with highly relevant articles from additional selected journals.

RESULTS

In the case of advanced or metastatic disease, where the goal of treatment is palliation and symptom-free survival, quality of life often becomes the primary desired outcome. In localized disease all treatments affect health related quality of life, although the impact of each therapy on sexual, urinary and bowel function is unique.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a highly personal and subjective entity, health related quality of life can be assessed using rigorous and scientifically stringent methods from the field of psychometric test theory. A substantial amount of literature exists regarding the use of established and validated instruments for assessing the impact of prostate cancer and its treatment on health related quality of life. This information is of critical importance when counseling men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer regarding treatment choices and is also helpful in setting appropriate expectations for men with metastatic disease.

Emotional and cognitive burden of prostate cancer

The wide-ranging effects of prostate cancer can be an emotional burden to the patient and his family. Recognizing important periods during the diagnosis and treatment that can be particularly stressful, the symptoms indicating patients are at high risk for emotional distress, and the signs and symptoms of emotional distress can encourage improved communication, education, treatment, and referral to minimize the effects of the emotional distress.

Patient satisfaction with treatment decisions for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study

BACKGROUND

Men with early-stage prostate carcinoma can choose aggressive treatment or conservative management. The authors used data from a population-based cohort of men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma to describe satisfaction with treatment decisions 24 months after diagnosis and to examine the association of demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics with treatment satisfaction.

METHODS

The authors evaluated 2365 men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma, diagnosed between October 1994 and October 1995, in one of six Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor registries and who were available for 24 month follow-up. Medical record review and patient-completed surveys provided demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical data and measured treatment satisfaction. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with satisfaction.

RESULTS

Overall, 59.2% of subjects were delighted or very pleased with their treatment selection. The perception of being cancer free (66.4%), maintaining urinary (64.2%) and bowel (60.5%) control and normal erectile function (65.9%), having good general health (71.3%), and preserving social relationships (68.1%) were significantly associated with being satisfied (P < 0.05). Men receiving no active treatment were less satisfied (50.5%, P < 0.001) than actively treated men, and Hispanic men were less satisfied than non-Hispanic white men after undergoing radical prostatectomy (50.1% vs. 58.0%, P = 0.05) or androgen deprivation (29.7% vs. 71.8%, P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of men were satisfied with their treatment selection for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Receiving an active treatment, believing oneself to be free of cancer, avoiding treatment complications, and having good overall health and social support were positively associated with satisfaction.

Is quality of life different for men with erectile dysfunction and prostate cancer compared to men with erectile dysfunction due to other causes? Results from the ExCEED data base

PURPOSE

To our knowledge the relationship between the underlying etiology of erectile dysfunction and its impact on health related quality of life has not been studied. Such a study is important for men with prostate cancer, as the potential negative quality of life impact of erectile dysfunction may affect clinical decision making in newly diagnosed disease. We compare health related quality of life in impotent men with prostate cancer to that of impotent men without prostate cancer using the Exploratory and Comprehensive Evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction (ExCEED, TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., Lake Forest, Illinois) data base, which is a multicenter, observational disease registry of men with erectile dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cohort included 168 men in ExCEED who had baseline health related quality of life measurement. Of these men 47 reported a history of prostate cancer while 121 did not. Appropriate univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing health related quality of life outcomes between impotent men with and without prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Men with erectile dysfunction and prostate cancer had worse sexual self-efficacy, erectile function, intercourse satisfaction and orgasmic function than those with erectile dysfunction without prostate cancer (all p <0.001). However, men with erectile dysfunction and prostate cancer experienced less psychological impact of erectile dysfunction on sexual experience (p = 0.05) and emotional life (p = 0.03) than those with erectile dysfunction without prostate cancer. The findings regarding the psychological impact of erectile dysfunction persisted in multivariate linear regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

Men with erectile dysfunction and prostate cancer appear to have better disease specific health related quality of life than those with erectile dysfunction and no history of prostate cancer. This finding has important ramifications for clinicians when counseling patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer and also when treating patients who present with erectile dysfunction of various etiologies.

A comprehensive and novel predictive modeling technique using detailed pathology factors in men with localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate modeling strategies using sextant core prostate biopsy specimen data that would best predict biochemical control in patients with localized prostate carcinoma treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB).

METHODS

One thousand four hundred seventy-seven patients underwent PPB between 1992 and 2000. The authors restricted analysis to those patients who had sextant biopsies (n = 1073). A central pathology review was undertaken on all specimens. Treatment consisted of PPB with either I-125 or Pd-103 prescribed to 144 Gy or 140 Gy, respectively. Two hundred twenty-eight patients (21%) received PPB in combination with external radiotherapy and 333 patients (31%) received neoadjuvant hormones. In addition to clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum, and pretreatment prostate specific antigen (pretx-PSA), the following detailed biopsy variables were considered: mean percentage of cancer in an involved core; maximum percentage of cancer; mean primary and secondary Gleason grades; maximum Gleason grade (primary or secondary); percentage of cancer in the apex, mid, and base; percent of cores positive; maximum primary and secondary Gleason grades in apex, mid, and base; maximum percent cancer in apex, mid, and base; maximum Gleason grade in apex, mid, and base; maximum primary Gleason grade; and maximum secondary Gleason grade. In all, 23 biopsy variables were considered. Four modeling strategies were compared. As a base model, the authors considered the pretx-PSA, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason sum as predictors. For the second model, the authors added percent of cores positive. The third modeling strategy was to use stepwise variable selection to select only those variables (from the total pool of 26) that were statistically significant. The fourth strategy was to apply principal components analysis, which has theoretical advantages over the other strategies. Principal components analysis creates component scores that account for maximum variance in the predictors.

RESULTS

The median followup of the study cohort was 36 months (range, 6-92), and the Kattan modification of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition was used to define PSA freedom from recurrence (PSA-FFR). The four models were compared in their ability to predict PSA-FFR as measured by the Somers D rank correlation coefficient. The Somers D rank correlation coefficients were then corrected for optimism with use of bootstrapping. The results for the four models were 0.32, 0.34, 0.37, and 0.39, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study shows that the use of principal components analysis with additional pathology data is a more discriminating model in predicting outcome in prostate carcinoma than other conventional methods and can also be used to model outcome predictions for patients treated with radical prostatectomy and external beam.