A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Paravertebral block is a proper alternative anesthesia for outpatient lithotripsy

Context:

This study evaluated the effectiveness of paravertebral block as an alternative anesthetic technique for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) procedure. A total of 50 patients with renal stones, aged 20-60 years, were randomly allocated into two groups; 25 patients in group P; received unilateral paravertebral block from T8 through L1 with injection of 5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 25 patients in group L; received local infiltration by bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg) into the 30 cm² area after localizing the stones site, 10 min before the session. A total of 10 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain every 10 min during the session. At the end of the procedure, total doses of rescue analgesia, the number of shockwaves, their power, and the total duration of shockwave treatment were recorded. After completion of the procedure, the patient was assessed for pain and nausea in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) using the VAS. Patient's satisfaction and time needed to discharge patients to home also were recorded. Time to do the anesthetic technique was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, it was 12.7 ± 2.3 min versus 6.9 ± 1.9 min, respectively; intraoperative rescue analgesia by fentanyl was lesser (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, 26.7 ± 6.32 mcg versus 78.6 ± 5.41 mcg, respectively, also time interval between ends of the procedure till discharge to home was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, it was 99 ± 17 min versus 133 ± 31 min, respectively. VAS was not significant difference between both groups either intraoperative or postoperative in first hour. Patient's satisfaction was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in group-P than group-L, it was 8.8 ± 1.1 versus 6.1 ± 0.6, respectively. Adverse events were lesser, but not significant in group-P than in group-L. Two patients (8%) in group-L and one patient (4%) in the group-P experienced episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Paravertebral block is an effective alternative anesthesia for outpatient lithotripsy; multiple level paravertebral blocks provide an optimal anesthetic condition, with acceptable adverse events for ESWL. And, providing proper analgesia during the procedure and in first hour after finishing of the procedure, early discharge to home and providing better patient's satisfactions.

Aims:

This study evaluated the effectiveness of paravertebral block as an alternative anesthetic technique for ESWL procedure.

Settings and Design:

Prospective open label study.

Subject and Methods:

A total of 50 patients with renal stones, aged 20-60 years, were randomly allocated into two groups; 25 patients in group P; received unilateral paravertebral block from T8 through L1 with injection of 5mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 25 patients in group L; received local infiltration by bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg) into the 30 cm² area after localizing the stones site, 10 min before the session. A total of 10 mm VAS was used to evaluate pain every 10 min during the session. At the end of the procedure, total doses of rescue analgesia, the number of shockwaves, their power, and the total duration of shockwave treatment were recorded. After completion of the procedure, the patient was assessed for pain and nausea in the PACU using the VAS. Patient's satisfaction and time needed to discharge patients to home also were recorded.

Statistical Analysis:

The findings of the two groups were statistically compared using SPSS version 12 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, number, and percentage. Nominal nonparametric data were analyzed using Chi-square test. Parametric data were compared using unpaired t-test. Ordinal nonparametric data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results:

Time to do the anesthetic technique was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, it was 12.7 ± 2.3 min versus 6.9 ± 1.9 min, respectively; intraoperative rescue analgesia by fentanyl was lesser (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, 26.7 ± 6.32 mcg versus 78.6 ± 5.41 mcg, respectively, also time interval between ends of the procedure till discharge to home was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group-P than group-L, it was 99 ± 17 min versus 133 ± 31 min, respectively. VAS was not significant difference between both groups either intraoperative or postoperative in first hour. Patient's satisfaction was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in group-P than group-L, it was 8.8 ± 1.1 versus 6.1 ± 0.6, respectively. Adverse events were lesser, but not significant in group-P than in group-L. Two patients (8%) in group-L and one patient (4%) in the group-P experienced episodes of PONV.

Conclusions:

Paravertebral block is an effective alternative anesthesia for outpatient lithotripsy; multiple level paravertebral blocks provide an optimal anesthetic condition, with acceptable adverse events for ESWL. And providing proper analgesia during the procedure and in first hour after finishing of the procedure, early discharge to home and providing better patient's satisfactions.

Accuracy of patient's turnover time prediction using RFID technology in an academic ambulatory surgery center

Patients flow in outpatient surgical unit is a major issue with regards to resource utilization, overall case load and patient satisfaction. An electronic Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) was used to document the overall time spent by the patients between their admission and discharge from the unit. The objective of this study was to evaluate how a RFID-based data collection system could provide an accurate prediction of the actual time for the patient to be discharged from the ambulatory surgical unit after surgery. This is an observational prospective evaluation carried out in an academic ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Data on length of stay at each step of the patient care, from admission to discharge, were recorded by a RFID device and analyzed according to the type of surgical procedure, the surgeon and the anesthetic technique. Based on these initial data (n = 1520), patients were scheduled in a sequential manner according to the expected duration of the previous case. The primary endpoint was the difference between actual and predicted time of discharge from the unit. A total of 414 consecutive patients were prospectively evaluated. One hundred seventy four patients (42%) were discharged at the predicted time ± 30 min. Only 24% were discharged behind predicted schedule. Using an automatic record of patient's length of stay would allow an accurate prediction of the discharge time according to the type of surgery, the surgeon and the anesthetic procedure.

Electroacupuncture for bladder function recovery in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

Purpose. To determine the efficacy of electroacupuncture on recovering postanesthetic bladder function. Materials and Methods. Sixty-one patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia were recruited and allocated into electroacupuncture or control group randomly. Patients in electroacupuncture group received electroacupuncture therapy whereas ones in control group were not given any intervention. Primary endpoint was incidence of bladder overdistension and postoperative urinary retention. Secondary endpoints included time to spontaneous micturition, voided volume, and adverse events. Results. All patients (31 in electroacupuncture group and 30 in control group) completed the evaluation. During postoperative follow-up, patients in electroacupuncture group presented a significant lower proportion of bladder overdistension than counterparts in control group (16.1% versus 53.3%, P < 0.01). However, no significant difference was found in incidence of postoperative urinary retention between the two groups (0% versus 6.7%, P > 0.05). Furthermore, a shorter time to spontaneous micturition was found in electroacupuncture group compared to control group (228 min versus 313 min, P < 0.001), whereas urine volume and adverse events had no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions. Electroacupuncture reduced the proportion of bladder overdistension and shortened the time to spontaneous micturition in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. Electroacupuncture may be a therapeutic strategy for postanesthetic bladder dysfunction.

Setting up an ambulatory regional anesthesia program for orthopedic surgery

This article presents an overview of how to set up an ambulatory regional anesthesia program for orthopedic surgery. This information is valuable to anesthesiologists who want to expand their regional anesthesia practice and provides a greater understanding of relevant issues and strategies to maximize success.

Postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty in elderly patients: treatment options

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure in the elderly and is associated with severe pain after surgery and a high incidence of chronic pain. Several factors are associated with severe acute pain after surgery, including psychological factors and severe preoperative pain. Good acute pain control can be provided with multimodal analgesia, including regional anesthesia techniques. Studies have demonstrated that poor acute pain control after TKA is strongly associated with development of chronic pain, and this emphasizes the importance of attention to good acute pain control after TKA. Pain after discharge from hospital after TKA is currently poorly managed, and this is an area where increased resources need to be focused to improve early pain control. This is particularly as patients are often discharged home within 4-5 days after surgery. Chronic pain after TKA in the elderly can be managed with both pharmacological and non-pharmacological techniques. After excluding treatable causes of pain, the simplest approach is with the use of acetaminophen combined with a short course of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Careful titration of opioid analgesics can also be helpful with other adjuvants such as the antidepressants or antiepileptic medications used especially for patients with neuropathic pain. Topical agents may provide benefit and are associated with fewer systemic side effects than oral administration. Complementary or psychological therapies may be beneficial for those patients who have failed other options or have depression associated with chronic pain.

Pain management in ambulatory surgery-a review

Day surgery, coming to and leaving the hospital on the same day as surgery as well as ambulatory surgery, leaving hospital within twenty-three hours is increasingly being adopted. There are several potential benefits associated with the avoidance of in-hospital care. Early discharge demands a rapid recovery and low incidence and intensity of surgery and anaesthesia related side-effects; such as pain, nausea and fatigue. Patients must be fit enough and symptom intensity so low that self-care is feasible in order to secure quality of care. Preventive multi-modal analgesia has become the gold standard. Administering paracetamol, NSIADs prior to start of surgery and decreasing the noxious influx by the use of local anaesthetics by peripheral block or infiltration in surgical field prior to incision and at wound closure in combination with intra-operative fast acting opioid analgesics, e.g., remifentanil, have become standard of care. Single preoperative 0.1 mg/kg dose dexamethasone has a combined action, anti-emetic and provides enhanced analgesia. Additional α-2-agonists and/or gabapentin or pregabalin may be used in addition to facilitate the pain management if patients are at risk for more pronounced pain. Paracetamol, NSAIDs and rescue oral opioid is the basic concept for self-care during the first 3–5 days after common day/ambulatory surgical procedures.

Peripheral nerve blocks for ambulatory surgery

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) provide significant improvement in postoperative analgesia and quality of recovery for ambulatory surgery. Use of continuous PNB techniques extend these benefits beyond the limited duration of single-injection PNBs. The use of ultrasound guidance has significantly improved the overall success, efficiency, and has contributed to the increased use of PNBs in the ambulatory setting. More recently, the use of ultrasound guidance has been demonstrated to decrease the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. This article provides a broad overview of the indications and clinically useful aspects of the most commonly used upper and lower extremity PNBs in the ambulatory setting. Emphasis is placed on approaches that can be used for single-injection PNBs and continuous PNB techniques.

Neuraxial anesthesia for outpatients

Neuraxial anesthesia for outpatient surgery can provide excellent anesthesia for certain patients. The short-acting local anesthetic 2-chloroprocaine has an appropriate length of action for short outpatient procedures with a very low risk of transient neurologic symptoms. Epidural anesthesia with short-acting agents can provide good outpatient anesthesia for procedures lasting 90 minutes or longer.

Improving the Peri-operative care of Patients by instituting a 'Block Room' for Regional Anaesthesia

Regional anaesthesia has multiple known benefits over general anaesthesia alone, but requires time and expertise for its application. This study aimed to decrease anaesthetic time and increase total surgical operative time by instituting a ‘block room’ where regional anaesthesia nerve blocks could be provided by expert anaesthetists in regular scheduled sessions.

A baseline audit showed that 2 hours per day was spent on performing nerve blocks. Development of the block room allowed nerve blocks to be performed in parallel to surgical operations, reducing the mean anaesthetic control time from 44 mins to 27 mins. This freed time for an extra operative case per day. In addition, pooling of expertise to one site has allowed excellent teaching opportunities for anaesthetic trainees, and a specific training programme for regional anaesthesia is being produced.

In conclusion, instituting a block room has improved the efficiency of our theatre complex, and improved the service deliverable to our patients.

Is regional anesthesia associated with reduced PACU length of stay?: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary medical center

BACKGROUND

Postanesthesia care is a costly component of overall surgical care. In the ambulatory setting, regional anesthesia has been shown for multiple surgical procedures to either decrease postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS) or completely bypass it altogether. This has not been demonstrated in a large hospital setting with a complex surgical case mix.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore determined whether regional anesthesia was associated with a reduced PACU LOS among patients undergoing inpatient and outpatient surgery in a large tertiary-care teaching hospital. Secondary study questions included risk factors for longer PACU LOS and any possible interaction between regional and general anesthesia as it might have affected PACU LOS.

METHODS

We performed a matched retrospective study on patients who had surgery at our institution and were admitted to the PACU immediately after leaving the operating room. We analyzed between January 1, 2005, and January 1, 2013, with one cohort receiving regional anesthesia, with or without general anesthesia, and the other receiving no regional anesthesia. We measured the association between regional anesthesia and time to successful PACU discharge using a Cox multivariate proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

After controlling for potentially confounding variables, including patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical classification, and duration of surgery (using multivariate analysis), there was no difference in the time to successful PACU discharge between patients who received regional anesthesia and those who did not. However, when compared to those who received general anesthesia, regional anesthesia was associated with decreased PACU LOS. Further, there was significant effect modification between regional and general anesthesia; patients who received both regional and general were more likely to be successfully discharged faster from the PACU than patients who received only general anesthesia (hazard ratio = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.46-1.55, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that independently, regional anesthesia is not associated with a reduced PACU LOS in an unselected population at a large tertiary-care hospital, but regional is favored when compared to general anesthesia. Whether the differences are clinically important, and in what procedures they are most pronounced, would be reasonable questions for future prospective comparative trials.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting

The present guidelines are the most recent data on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and an update on the 2 previous sets of guidelines published in 2003 and 2007. These guidelines were compiled by a multidisciplinary international panel of individuals with interest and expertise in PONV under the auspices of the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia. The panel members critically and systematically evaluated the current medical literature on PONV to provide an evidence-based reference tool for the management of adults and children who are undergoing surgery and are at increased risk for PONV. These guidelines identify patients at risk for PONV in adults and children; recommend approaches for reducing baseline risks for PONV; identify the most effective antiemetic single therapy and combination therapy regimens for PONV prophylaxis, including nonpharmacologic approaches; recommend strategies for treatment of PONV when it occurs; provide an algorithm for the management of individuals at increased risk for PONV as well as steps to ensure PONV prevention and treatment are implemented in the clinical setting.

Preoperative femoral nerve block in hip arthroscopic surgery: a retrospective review of 108 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

The utility of a femoral nerve block as an adjunct for pain management has been recognized for various surgical techniques but has yet to be examined in the preoperative setting as an adjunct to general anesthesia for improved postoperative pain control in hip arthroscopic surgery.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a preoperative femoral nerve block for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 108 consecutive hip arthroscopic surgery cases (in 103 patients) was carried out. All patients underwent arthroscopic surgery under a general anesthetic with or without a preoperative femoral nerve block. Groups were compared with respect to patient sex, age, and body mass index (BMI); physical status classification according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA); procedure performed; operative time; total intraoperative morphine-equivalent dose; pain scores (0-10 scale) recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes postoperatively in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU); total morphine-equivalent dose in the PACU; presence of nausea or vomiting in the PACU; time to discharge from the PACU; oxycodone consumption in the surgical day care unit (SDCU); and maximal patient-reported pain score in the SDCU.

RESULTS

Twelve cases were excluded from the analysis for a total of 96 cases (in 92 patients). Forty patients had general anesthesia alone (group A), and 56 patients had a preoperative femoral nerve block before the induction of general anesthesia (group B). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to sex, age, weight, height, BMI, ASA classification, or type of procedure performed. Patients who received a femoral nerve block also received a significantly lower total intraoperative morphine-equivalent dose than did those patients who did not receive a block. Postoperative patient-reported pain scores were lower at all time points for the femoral nerve block group; however, a statistical significance was seen only at the 60-minute postoperative time point. Patients who did not receive a block had significantly higher morphine-equivalent doses in the PACU. There was no difference in the rates of nausea and vomiting and time to discharge from the PACU between the 2 groups. Oxycodone consumption in the SDCU was similar between the groups, but the femoral nerve block group had significantly lower maximal patient-reported pain scores in the SDCU. Two patients in the general anesthesia group were admitted to the hospital postoperatively because of inadequate postoperative pain control. No complications were noted in any patient with regard to the femoral nerve block.

CONCLUSION

A preoperative femoral nerve block is a relatively safe procedure that may decrease the requirement for intraoperative morphine while providing effective postoperative pain control in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery.

Comparison between intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for ambulatory knee arthroscopy

AIM: To compare the effect of hyperbaric levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on the quality of the block, patient satisfaction, and discharge time in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery under unilateral spinal anesthesia.

METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two patients, American Society of Anaesthesiologists I or II, scheduled for elective ambulatory knee arthroscopy were randomly assigned to four double-blind groups. To achieve a unilateral spinal block, Group BF received 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 20 μg of fentanyl intrathecally, Group LF received 5 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine plus 20 μg of fentanyl intrathecally, Group B received 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally, and Group L received 5 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine intrathecally. The level and duration of the sensory block, the intensity and duration of the motor block, the time to first analgesic requirement, and the time elapsed until the patient’s discharge were recorded. Hemodynamic values and adverse effects were also recorded.

RESULTS: The duration of time needed to reach the T12 dermatome level was significantly longer in Group L [7 (3-20) min] than in Group B [6 (3-12) min] (P = 0.006). The maximum sensory level reached on the side undergoing the operation was significantly higher in Group BF than in Group B (P < 0.05). The intensity of the motor blockade was greater in Group BF than in Group LF and L. Complete recovery from motor blockade occurred earlier in Groups LF [75 (45-165) min] and L [63 (35-120) min] than in Group BF [115 (60-180) min] (P < 0.05). The length of time needed for the sensory block to regress to the level of S2 was shorter in Group L (154 ± 50) than in Group BF (192 ± 66) (P < 0.05). The quality of the block was significantly lower in Group L than in Groups BF, LF and B (P = 0.012, P = 0.003, and P < 0.001, respectively). The time elapsed until Visual Analog Scale ≥ 4 was significantly shorter in Group L (110 ± 48) than in Groups BF (200 ± 60), LF (156 ± 61) and B (162 ± 52) (P < 0.05). The time elapsed until the patient’s discharge was shorter in Groups B (244 ± 54) and L (229 ± 55) than in Group BF (288 ± 64) (P = 0.021 and P = 0.001, respectively). There were no differences among the groups regarding hemodynamic parameters and adverse events, except for pruritus. The occurrence of pruritus was significantly more frequent in Groups BF and LF than in other groups.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine plus 20 μg of fentanyl provided a better spinal anesthesia than 5 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine alone.

Perioperative evaluation of tumescent anaesthesia technique in bitches submitted to unilateral mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Tumescent anaesthesia (TA) is a widely used technique in oncologic surgeries necessitating large resection margins. This technique produces transoperative and postoperative analgesia, reduces surgical bleeding, and facilitates tissue divulsion. This prospective, randomised, blind study evaluated the use of TA in bitches submitted to mastectomy and compared the effect of TA with an intravenous fentanyl bolus. A 2.5-mcg/kg intravenous fentanyl bolus (n = 10) was compared with TA using 0.275% lidocaine (n = 10) in bitches submitted to unilateral mastectomy. Sedation was performed by intramuscular (IM) injection of 0.05 mg/kg of acepromazine combined with 2 mg/kg of meperidine. Anaesthesia was induced with 5 mg/kg of intravenous propofol and maintained with isoflurane/O2. Heart and respiratory rates; systolic, mean, and diastolic arterial blood pressures; central venous pressure; SpO2; ETCO2; inspired and expired isoflurane concentrations; and temperature were measured transoperatively. Visual analogue scales for sedation and pain and the Glasgow composite and Melbourne pain scales were used for postoperative assessment. The surgeon investigated the quality of the surgical approach, considering bleeding and resection ability, and the incidence of postoperative wound complications.

RESULTS

The heart rate was lower and the end-tidal isoflurane concentration was higher in dogs treated with fentanyl than in dogs treated with TA. A fentanyl bolus was administered to 8 of 10 dogs treated with fentanyl and to none treated with TA. Intraoperative bleeding and the mammary gland excision time were lower in dogs treated with TA. The maximal mean and individual plasma lidocaine concentrations were 1426 ± 502 ng/ml and 2443 ng/ml at 90 minutes after infiltration, respectively. The Glasgow Composite Pain Scale scores were higher in dogs treated with fentanyl than in dogs treated with TA until 2 hours after extubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with intravenous fentanyl, TA in bitches: may be easily performed in non-inflamed, ulcerated, adhered mammary tumours; has an isoflurane-sparing effect; improves transoperative and immediate postoperative analgesia; is apparently safe for use in clinical conditions as evidenced by the fact that it did not produce any adverse signs or lidocaine plasma concentrations compatible with toxicity; does not modify the recovery time; and facilitates the surgical procedure without interfering with wound healing.

Facilitatory effects of perineural dexmedetomidine on neuraxial and peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nerve blocks improve postoperative analgesia, but their benefits may be short-lived. This quantitative review examines whether perineural dexmedetomidine as a local anaesthetic (LA) adjuvant for neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks can prolong the duration of analgesia compared with LA alone. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of dexmedetomidine as an LA adjuvant to LA alone on neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks were reviewed. Sensory block duration, motor block duration, block onset times, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, and side-effects were analysed.

RESULTS

were combined using random-effects modelling. A total of 516 patients were analysed from nine RCTs. Five trials investigated dexmedetomidine as part of spinal anaesthesia and four as part of a brachial plexus (BP) block. Sensory block duration was prolonged by 150 min [95% confidence interval (CI): 96, 205, P<0.00001] with intrathecal dexmedetomidine. Perineural dexmedetomidine used in BP block may prolong the mean duration of sensory block by 284 min (95% CI: 1, 566, P=0.05), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Motor block duration and time to first analgesic request were prolonged for both intrathecal and BP block. Dexmedetomidine produced reversible bradycardia in 7% of BP block patients, but no effect on the incidence of hypotension. No patients experienced respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine is a potential LA adjuvant that can exhibit a facilitatory effect when administered intrathecally as part of spinal anaesthesia or peripherally as part of a BP block. However, there are presently insufficient safety data to support perineural dexmedetomidine use in the clinical setting.

Comparative study of intravenous opioid consumption in the postoperative period

BACKGROUND

Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) using opiods is an accepted method for delivering postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study was to compare fentanyl and tramadol with IV PCA after spinal anesthesia (SA) and general anesthesia (GA) following cesarean section (C/S).

METHODS

Ninety women were randomly assigned to three groups (n=30). Group 1 was treated with IV fentanyl PCA after SA. Groups 2 and 3 were treated with IV fentanyl PCA and IV tramadol PCA after GA. Outcome measures were recorded for the first 24 h post-anesthesia.

RESULTS

PCA use was significantly lower after SA (P<0.05). Eighteen patients in the SA Group and 27 patients and 24 patients from the GA groups required additional opioid. Opioid consumption and patient satisfaction were similar for groups after GA (P>0.05). 638.4 ± 179.1 μg fentanyl was consumed by patients of Group 2, 356.3 ± 87.0 μg fentanyl and 559.5 ± 207.0 mg tramadol was consumed by Group 1 and Group 3 respectively. There was no significant difference in the overall severity and incidence of nausea, drowsiness or pruritus.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that analgesic consumption and post-operative pain scores after SA in C/S decreased, without increase in adverse reactions.

Neuraxial anesthesia compared to general anesthesia for procedures on the lower half of the body: systematic review of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Systematic reviews organize literature data by combining results from published studies in order to resolve conflicts in the area of medical knowledge describing the interventions. The inadequate reporting of systematic reviews can damage the credibility and interfere in the results' quality. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of good quality systematic reviews comparing neuraxial anesthesia with general anesthesia for procedures on the lower half of the body.

METHODS

Systematic review of systematic reviews. Primary variable: The frequency of good quality systematic reviews. The information was analyzed from the following databases: LILACS (January 1982 to December 2010); PubMed (January 1950 to December 2010); The Cochrane Database of Systematic Review and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (volume 10, 2010); and SciELO (December 2010). The quality of systematic reviews was determined by the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. The sample size calculation showed that it was necessary to analyze eight systematic reviews, taking into account that the frequency of good quality systematic reviews was 5%, an absolute precision of 15%, and a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

Were identified 1,995 articles. The selection process eliminated 1,968 articles. Twenty-seven articles of systematic reviews were read in full, 9 were excluded due to incompatibility with the inclusion criteria, and 8 were duplicate publications. Ten systematic reviews were assessed for their quality. The frequency of good quality systematic reviews was 40% (4/10; 95% CI 9.6 to 70.4%).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of good quality systematic reviews was 40%.

Acute pain management in the postanesthesia care unit

Pain management in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) is continually evolving, with several new nonopioids expanding the list of available agents. Pain in the PACU is not an inevitable outcome of surgery. With careful planning, multimodal analgesic techniques instituted preoperatively will reduce pain in the PACU. Accurate assessment of the characteristics of pain will direct rational drug choices while minimizing side effects. Better management of pain in the PACU setting will likely improve patient satisfaction and facilitate shorter PACU stays.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus transvaginal mesh for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse

Both expert surgeons agree with the following: (1) Surgical mesh, whether placed laparoscopically or transvaginally, is indicated for pelvic floor reconstruction in cases involving recurrent advanced pelvic organ prolapse. (2) Procedural expertise and experience gained from performing a high volume of cases is fundamentally necessary. Knowledge of outcomes and complications from an individual surgeon's audit of cases is also needed when discussing the risks and benefits of procedures and alternatives. Yet controversy still exists on how best to teach new surgical techniques and optimal ways to efficiently track outcomes, including subjective and objective cure of prolapse as well as perioperative complications. A mesh registry will be useful in providing data needed for surgeons. Cost factors are also a consideration since laparoscopic and especially robotic surgical mesh procedures are generally more costly than transvaginal mesh kits when operative time, extra instrumentation and length of stay are included. Long-term outcomes, particularly for transvaginal mesh procedures, are lacking. In conclusion, all surgery poses risks; however, patients should be made aware of the pros and cons of various routes of surgery as well as the potential risks and benefits of using mesh. Surgeons should provide patients with honest information about their own experience implanting mesh and also their experience dealing with mesh-related complications.

Changes in anesthesia-related factors in ambulatory knee and shoulder surgery: United States 1996-2006

BACKGROUND

Analyses of existing nationally representative information on how changes in ambulatory orthopedic surgery have affected anesthesia practice over time are rare. We sought to characterize temporal changes in factors surrounding ambulatory orthopedic surgery and anesthesia.

METHODS

Data from the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery for the years of 1996 and 2006 were analyzed. Entries indicating the performance of knee ligamentoplasty, meniscectomy, or shoulder arthroscopy were identified and included in the sample. Temporal changes in a number of variables associated with orthopedic ambulatory surgery were assessed, including (1) the number of procedures being performed, (2) patient and health care system-related demographics, and (3) anesthesia-related variables.

RESULTS

Nationwide, the total number of ligamentoplasties, meniscectomies, and shoulder arthroscopies increased from 1996 to 2006 by 66% (n = 258,932 to n = 428,712), 51% (n = 456,698 to n = 690,164), and 349% (n = 93,105 to n = 418,188), respectively (P < 0.0001). Between 1996 and 2006, the use of peripheral nerve blocks increased from 0.6% to 9.8% for meniscectomies (P < 0.0001), from 1.5% to 13.7% for ligamentoplasties (P < 0.0001), and from 11.5% to 23.9% for shoulder arthroscopies (P < 0.0001), respectively. Neuraxial anesthesia utilization fell from 11.8% to 6.3% for meniscectomies (P < 0.0001) and 13.6% to 7.3% for ligamentoplasties (P < 0.0001) from 1996 to 2006, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial increases in the number of ambulatory knee and shoulder procedures occurred over time, relating to increased demand for anesthesia providers in this field. Trends toward increased use of peripheral nerve blocks may have to be considered by educators when preparing residents for practice.

Regional anesthesia for children undergoing orthopedic ambulatory surgeries in the United States, 1996-2006

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to evaluate national trends in regional anesthetic techniques among children undergoing ambulatory orthopedic procedures.

PURPOSE AND QUESTIONS

We aimed to determine whether an increase in regional anesthetics was primarily driven by an increase in the number of peripheral nerve blocks performed rather than an increase in neuraxial techniques. We further aimed to determine whether the proportion of peripheral nerve blocks performed in conjunction with general anesthesia has increased over time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study sample included any pediatric patient (i.e., <18 years old) who underwent an orthopedic ambulatory procedure in 1996 and 2006. We obtained data on ambulatory surgical procedures by accessing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery. Patient demographics (age, gender), procedure information, and anesthesia-related variables were analyzed for each year.

RESULTS

The proportion of peripheral nerve blocks performed for ambulatory surgery more than doubled from 1996 (4.4 %) to 2006 (8.1 %). A significantly larger proportion of orthopedic procedures were being performed with a combination of peripheral nerve blocks and general anesthesia (1.2 % in 1996 and 43 % 2006). The use of neuraxial anesthesia for lower extremity surgeries decreased over the 10-year period (1.1 and 0.4 % in 1996 and 2006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant increase in the use of peripheral nerve blocks for children undergoing ambulatory orthopedic procedures in the USA, while neuraxial techniques became less common over the 10-year period. The peripheral nerve blocks were frequently performed in conjunction with general anesthesia.

Local anesthetic Schwann cell toxicity is time and concentration dependent

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve blocks with local anesthetics (LAs) are commonly performed to provide surgical anesthesia or postoperative analgesia. Nerve injury resulting in persistent numbness or weakness is a potentially serious complication. Local anesthetics have previously been shown to damage neuronal and Schwann cells via several mechanisms. We sought to test the hypothesis that LAs are toxic to Schwann cells and that the degree of toxicity is directly related to the concentration of LA and duration of exposure. Intraneural injection of LAs has been shown to produce nerve injury. We sought to test the hypothesis that a prolonged extraneural infusion of LA can also produce injury.

METHODS

Schwann cells cultured from neonatal rat sciatic nerves were incubated with LAs at different concentrations (10, 100, 500, and 1000 μM), and each concentration was assessed for toxicity after 4, 24, 48 and 72 hours of exposure. Local anesthetics tested were lidocaine, mepivacaine, chloroprocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine. Cell death was assessed by lactate dehydrogenase release measured by optical density.In a separate experiment, a microcatheter was placed along the sciatic nerves of Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were randomly assigned to receive either 0.9% saline (n = 8) or bupivacaine (0.5%, n = 4; 0.75%, n = 4) via the perineural catheters for 72 hours. The rats were then killed, and their nerves sectioned and stained for analysis. Sections were stained for myelin and with an antimacrophage (CD68) antibody.

RESULTS

None of the LAs tested produced significant Schwann cell death at very low concentrations (10 μM, or 0.0003%) even after prolonged exposure. With prolonged exposure (48 or 72 hrs) to high concentrations (1000 μM, or 0.03%), all of the LAs tested produced significant Schwann cell death (increased lactate dehydrogenase release relative to control as measured by optical density, 0.384-0.974; all P values < 0.001). Only bupivacaine produced significant cell death (0.482, P < 0.001) after prolonged exposure to low concentrations (100 μM, or 0.003%). At intermediate concentrations (500 μM, or 0.015%), cell death was more widespread with bupivacaine (0.768, P < 0.001) and ropivacaine (0.675, P < 0.001) than the other agents (0.204-0.368; all P values < 0.001). Prolonged extraneural exposure of rat sciatic nerves to bupivacaine caused significant demyelination and infiltration of nerves with inflammatory cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Local anesthetics induce Schwann cell death in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine have greater toxicity at intermediate concentrations, and prolonged exposure to bupivacaine produces significant toxicity even at low concentrations. Brief exposure to high concentrations of bupivacaine damages Schwann cells. Prolonged extraneural infusion of bupivacaine results in nerve injury.

Anesthesia protocol for heel pressure ulcer debridement

Heel ulcers are clinically challenging. Limited subcutaneous tissue covering the calcaneus bone makes the heel vulnerable to pressure injury. Adequate debridement of fibrotic, infected, and necrotic tissue is essential for healing. The authors report a standardized anesthesia protocol using regional anesthesia with sedation rather than general anesthesia for heel debridement.

Perioperative care for the older outpatient undergoing ambulatory surgery

As the number of ambulatory surgery procedures continues to grow in an aging global society, the implementation of evidence-based perioperative care programs for the elderly will assume increased importance. Given the recent advances in anesthesia, surgery, and monitoring technology, the ambulatory setting offers potential advantages for elderly patients undergoing elective surgery. In this review article we summarize the physiologic and pharmacologic effects of aging and their influence on anesthetic drugs, the important considerations in the preoperative evaluation of elderly outpatients with coexisting diseases, the advantages and disadvantages of different anesthetic techniques on a procedural-specific basis, and offer recommendations regarding the management of common postoperative side effects (including delirium and cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, dizziness, pain, and gastrointestinal dysfunction) after ambulatory surgery. We conclude with a discussion of future challenges related to the growth of ambulatory surgery practice in this segment of our surgical population. When information specifically for the elderly population was not available in the peer-reviewed literature, we drew from relevant information in other ambulatory surgery populations.

AREA: an augmented reality system for epidural anaesthesia

PURPOSE

Spinal needle injection procedures are used for anesthesia and analgesia, such as lumbar epidurals. These procedures require careful placement of a needle, both to ensure effective therapy delivery and to avoid damaging sensitive tissue such as the spinal cord. An important step in such procedures is the accurate identification of the vertebral levels, which is currently performed using manual palpation with a reported 30% success rate for correct identification.

METHODS

An augmented reality system was developed to help identify the lumbar vertebral levels. The system consists of an ultrasound transducer tracked in real time by a trinocular camera system, an automatic ultrasound panorama generation module that provides an extended view of the lumbar vertebrae, an image processing technique that automatically identifies the vertebral levels in the panorama image, and a graphical interface that overlays the identified levels on a live camera view of the patient's back.

RESULTS

Validation was performed on ultrasound data obtained from 10 subjects with different spine arching. The average success rate for segmentation of the vertebrae was 85%. The automatic level identification had an average accuracy of 6.6 mm.

CONCLUSION

The prototype system demonstrates better accuracy for identifying the vertebrae than traditional manual methods.

[Future-oriented design of ambulatory surgery. Organizational aspects and medical options]

Ambulatory surgery continues to grow and is slowly becoming routine in the majority of cases. Although the development of ambulatory surgery in Germany appears to be somewhat delayed, this is actually a chance to learn from worldwide experiences and avoid the mistakes others made earlier. This article investigates current trends and developments in day case surgery and discusses the extended role and influence of the anesthetist in the perioperative setting.

Perioperative single dose ketorolac to prevent postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Preventive analgesia using non-opioid analgesic strategies is recognized as a pathway to improve postoperative pain control while minimizing opioid-related side effects. Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug frequently used to treat postoperative pain. However, the optimal dose and route of administration for systemic single dose ketorolac to prevent postoperative pain is not well defined. We performed a quantitative systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of a single dose of perioperative ketorolac on postoperative analgesia.

METHODS

We followed the PRISMA statement guidelines. A wide search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of a single dose of systemic ketorolac on postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Effects of ketorolac dose were evaluated by pooling studies into 30- and 60-mg dosage groups. Asymmetry of funnel plots was examined using Egger regression. The presence of heterogeneity was assessed by subgroup analysis according to the route of systemic administration (IV versus IM) and the time of drug administration (preincision versus postincision).

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized clinical trials with 782 subjects were included. The weighted mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of combined effects showed a difference for ketorolac over placebo for early pain at rest of -0.64 (-1.11 to -0.18) but not at late pain at rest, -0.29 (-0.88 to 0.29) summary point (0-10 scale). Opioid consumption was decreased by the 60-mg dose, with a mean (95% CI) IV morphine equivalent consumption of -1.64 mg (-2.90 to -0.37 mg). The opioid-sparing effects of ketorolac compared with placebo were greater when the drug was administered IM compared with when the drug was administered IV, with a mean difference (95% CI) IV morphine equivalent consumption of -2.13 mg (-4.1 to -0.21 mg). Postoperative nausea and vomiting were reduced by the 60-mg dose, with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 0.49 (0.29-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Single dose systemic ketorolac is an effective adjunct in multimodal regimens to reduce postoperative pain. Improved postoperative analgesia achieved with ketorolac was also accompanied by a reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting. The 60-mg dose offers significant benefits but there is a lack of current evidence that the 30-mg dose offers significant benefits on postoperative pain outcomes.

A dose-ranging study of the effect of transversus abdominis block on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after outpatient laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain can delay functional recovery after outpatient surgery. Multimodal analgesia can improve pain and possibly improve quality of recovery. In this study, we evaluated the dose-dependent effects of a preoperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on patient recovery using the Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) questionnaire after ambulatory gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Global QoR-40 scores range from 40 to 200, representing very poor to outstanding quality of recovery, respectively.

METHODS

Healthy women undergoing outpatient gynecological laparoscopy were randomly allocated to receive a preoperative TAP block using saline, ropivacaine 0.25%, or ropivacaine 0.5%. Needle placement for the TAP blocks was performed using ultrasound guidance and 15 mL of the study solution was injected bilaterally by a blinded investigator. QoR-40 score and analgesic use were assessed 24 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was global QoR-40 score at 24 hours after surgery. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Post hoc pairwise comparisons were made using the Dunn test with P values and 95% confidence intervals Bonferroni corrected for 6 comparisons.

RESULTS

Seventy-five subjects were enrolled and 70 subjects completed the study. The median (range) for the QoR-40 score after the TAP block was 157 (127-193), 173 (133-195), and 172 (130-196) for the saline group and 0.25% and 0.5% ropivacaine groups, respectively. The median difference (99.2% confidence interval) in QoR-40 score for 0.5% bupivacaine (16 [1-30], P=0.03) and 0.25% bupivacaine (17 [2-31], P=0.01) was more than saline but not significantly different between ropivacaine groups (-1 [-16 to 12], P=1.0). Increased global QoR-40 scores correlated with decreased area under the pain score time curve during postanesthesia recovery room stay (ρ=-0.56, 99.2% upper confidence limit [UCL]=-0.28), 24-hour opioid consumption (ρ=-0.61, 99.2% UCL=-0.34), pain score (0-10 scale) at 24 hours (ρ=-0.53, 99.2% UCL=-0.25), and time to discharge readiness (ρ=-0.65, 99.2% UCL=-0.42). The aforementioned variables were lower in the TAP block groups receiving ropivacaine compared with saline.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAP block is an effective adjunct in a multimodal analgesic strategy for ambulatory laparoscopic procedures. TAP blocks with ropivacaine 0.25% and 0.5% reduced pain, decreased opioid consumption, and provided earlier discharge readiness that was associated with better quality of recovery.

Neurokinin-1 and novel serotonin antagonists for postoperative and postdischarge nausea and vomiting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will address novel options for the prevention and treatment of postoperative and postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PONV and PDNV) after ambulatory anesthesia. In particular, this paper will review the characteristics of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1-RAs) and the new serotonin receptor antagonist (5HT3-RA) palonosetron. Finally, we will discuss strategies for prophylaxis and treatment of PONV and PDNV that address the unique concerns in ambulatory surgery patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

First, although PONV has previously been recognized to be a problem for inpatients, new research suggests that the incidence of PDNV after ambulatory surgery may be as high as 35%. Second, NK1-RAs, including aprepitant, the first approved member of this family, are significantly more efficacious than any other antiemetic for the prevention of vomiting. They are however not more effective than other interventions for the control of nausea. Third, the next generation of 5HT3-RAs, such as palonosetron, does not affect the QT interval and has a half-life of 40 h that should be advantageous for the prevention of PDNV.

SUMMARY

Because of the high incidence of PDNV, a predictive model for PDNV would be helpful to determine appropriate antiemetic interventions for each individual patient. Drugs that may be particularly favorable are the novel NK1-RA aprepitant and the next generation 5HT3-RA palonosetron.

Methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of postoperative epidural analgesia: validation of the Epidural Analgesia Trial Checklist as a specific instrument to evaluate methodology

BACKGROUND

The overall benefits of epidural analgesia are controversial, in part because of the varying quality of methodology in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We performed a systematic review of available RCTs to examine the methodological quality of epidural analgesia trials. Current instruments for evaluating the quality of methodology are generic; thus, we also developed a specific assessment tool named Epidural Analgesia Trial Checklist (EATC).

METHODS

The National Library of Medicine's PubMed database was searched (1966 to January 2006) for RCTs of epidural analgesia. All RCTs that had epidural infusion analgesia in at least 1 study arm and as primary intervention for randomization were included. Two independent reviewers were given blinded full-text paper versions of each article and reviewed all articles for inclusion in this study. Study characteristics were extracted from accepted RCTs, and reviewers completed the standardized 7-item Jadad score, 22-item Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist, and 8-item EATC for evaluation of methodological quality.

RESULTS

A total of 321 articles met all inclusion criteria. The overall median (first, third quartiles) Jadad, CONSORT, and EATC scores were 2 (1, 3), 10 (8, 11), and 4 (3, 6) (of maximum scores of 5, 22, and 8), respectively. For all assessments, we found significantly higher methodological study quality for articles with a larger study population size, those written by a first author affiliated with an anesthesiology department, and studies published after release of the CONSORT statement with a significant overall increase in methodological quality over time. There was no effect on methodological quality with regard to region of publication or number of centers. There was relatively high interrater agreement when using the EATC (κ = 0.92). The items most frequently lacking from the studies captured using the EATC were appropriate description/definition of adverse effects (11.8% of all studies properly reported this), proper presentation of visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (31.2%), and assessment of VAS pain both at rest and with activity (39.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Methodology scores for epidural analgesia RCTs have improved over time. The EATC seems to correlate well with other commonly used generic assessments for methodological RCT quality and be useful for assessing methodological quality of epidural RCTs. Future epidural analgesia RCTs should focus on improving appropriate description/definition of adverse effects, proper presentation of VAS pain scores, and assessment of VAS pain both at rest and with activity.

[Perioperative management of long-term medication]

Anesthesiologists and surgeons are increasingly faced with patients who are under long-term medication. Some of these drugs can interact with anaesthetics or anaesthesia and/or surgical interventions. As a result, patients may experience complications such as bleeding, ischemia, infection or severe circulatory reactions. On the other hand, perioperative discontinuation of medication is often more dangerous. The proportion of outpatient operations has increased dramatically in recent years and will probably continue to increase. Since the implementation of DRGs (pending in Switzerland, introduced in Germany for some time), the patient enters the hospital the day before operation. This means that the referring physician as well as anesthesiologists and surgeons at an early stage must deal with issues of perioperative pharmacotherapy. This review article is about the management of the major drug classes during the perioperative period. In addition to cardiac and centrally acting drugs and drugs that act on hemostasis and the endocrine system, special cases such as immunosuppressants and herbal remedies are mentioned.

Neurological adverse events following regional anesthesia administration

Regional anesthesia and analgesia have been associated with improved analgesia, decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting, and increased patient satisfaction for many types of surgical procedures. In obstetric anesthesia care, it has also been associated with improved maternal mortality and major morbidity. The majority of neurological adverse events following regional anesthesia administration result in temporary sensory symptoms; long-term or permanent disabling motor and sensory problems are very rare. Infection and hemorrhagic complications, particularly with neuraxial blocks, can cause neurological adverse events. More commonly, however, there are no associated secondary factors and some combination of needle trauma, intraneural injection, and/or local anesthetic toxicity may be associated, but their individual contributions to any event are difficult to define.

Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanyl

BACKGROUND

Prospective data on the use of prilocaine for ambulatory spinal anaesthesia remain limited. We compared the behaviour and characteristics of subarachnoid block using prilocaine and fentanyl with that of bupivacaine and fentanyl.

METHODS

In a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 50 patients undergoing elective ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery received subarachnoid anaesthesia, with either prilocaine 20 mg and fentanyl 20 µg (Group P) or plain bupivacaine 7.5 mg and fentanyl 20 µg (Group B). Primary endpoints included times for onset of maximum sensory block level and regression of sensory block to L4, and also motor block at 1 and 2 h, and levels of haemodynamic stability. Comparisons between the groups were made by χ² test for proportions and the Mann-Whitney test for ordinal data. Time-to-event data were analysed by the Mann-Whitney test for uncensored data or the logrank test for censored data.

RESULTS

At 2 h, motor block in Group P had fully resolved in 86% of patients, compared with 27% in Group B (P<0.001). Median time to regression of sensory block to L4 was significantly shorter in Group P (97 min) than in Group B (280 min) (P<0.001). A clinically significant decrease in arterial pressure was more common in Group B (73%) than in Group P (32%) (P=0.004). Two patients in Group P required conversion to general anaesthesia, but for reasons unrelated to prilocaine itself.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of prilocaine and fentanyl is a better alternative to that of low-dose bupivacaine and fentanyl, for spinal anaesthesia in ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery.