Is Hepatic Resection for Large or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma Justified? Results From a Multi-Institutional Database

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) convened an international working party on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in December 2008 to develop consensus recommendations.

METHODS

The working party consisted of expert hepatologist, hepatobiliary surgeon, radiologist, and oncologist from Asian-Pacific region, who were requested to make drafts prior to the consensus meeting held at Bali, Indonesia on 4 December 2008. The quality of existing evidence and strength of recommendations were ranked from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest) and from A (strongest) to D (weakest), respectively, according to the Oxford system of evidence-based approach for developing the consensus statements.

RESULTS

Participants of the consensus meeting assessed the quality of cited studies and assigned grades to the recommendation statements. Finalized recommendations were presented at the fourth APASL single topic conference on viral-related HCC at Bali, Indonesia and approved by the participants of the conference.

Surgical treatment for liver cancer

Primary liver cancer is amongst the commonest tumors worldwide, particularly in parts of the developing world, and is increasing in incidence. Over the past three decades, surgical hepatic resection has evolved from a high risk, resource intensive procedure with limited application, to a safe and commonly performed operation with a range of indications. This article reviews the approach to surgical resection for malignancies such as hepatocellular cancer, metastatic liver deposits and neuroendocrine tumors. Survival data after resection is also reviewed, as well as indications for curative resection.

[Practice guidelines for management of hepatocellular carcinoma 2009]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cancer in Korea, typically has a poor prognosis, and constitutes the majority of primary hepatic malignancies. It is the number one cause of death among people in their 50s in Korea. The five-year survival rate of liver cancer is poor; at 18.9%. Efforts to increase the survival rate through early diagnosis of HCC and optimal treatments are keenly needed. Western guideline for the management of HCC were developed, but these guidelines are somewhat unsuitable for Korean patients. Thus, the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (KLCSG) and the National Cancer Center (NCC), Korea jointly produced the Clinical Practice Guidelines for HCC for the first time in Korea in 2003. Owing to medical advances over the following six years, diagnosis and treatment of HCC has changed considerably. As more national and foreign data are accumulated, KLCSG and NCC, Korea recently revised the Clinical Practice Guidelines for HCC. Forty or more specialists in the field of hepatology, general surgery, radiology and radiation oncology participated, and meticulously reviewed national and foreign papers, and collected opinions through advisory committee conferences. These multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines summarized diagnosis, surgical resection, liver transplantation, local treatments, transarterial chemoembolization, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, preemptive antiviral treatments, and response evaluation of HCC. These Korean guidelines are expected to be useful for clinical management of and research on HCC.

Perioperative mortality for management of hepatic neoplasm: a simple risk score

OBJECTIVES

To develop a population-based risk score for stratifying patients by risk of in-hospital mortality following procedural intervention for hepatic neoplasm.

BACKGROUND

There has been growing support for the value of surgical management of hepatic neoplastic disease, both primary and metastatic. Advances in surgical and ablative technologies have contributed to a decrease in the mortality associated with these procedures. However, multiple patient-, disease- and treatment-related factors can contribute to perioperative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2005, a retrospective cohort of patient-discharges for hepatic procedures with a concurrent diagnosis of hepatic primary or metastatic neoplasm to the liver was assembled. Procedures were categorized as lobectomy, wedge resection, or enucleation/ablation. Logistic regression and bootstrap methods were used to create an integer score for estimating the risk of in-hospital mortality using patient demographics, comorbidities, procedure type, tumor type, and hospital characteristics. A randomly selected sample of 80% of the cohort was used to create the risk score. Testing was conducted in the remaining 20% validation-set.

RESULTS

In total, 12,969 patient-discharges were identified. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.45%. Predictive characteristics incorporated into the model included: age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, procedure type, hospital type, and type of neoplasm. Integer values were assigned to these, and used to calculate an additive score. Five clinically relevant groups were assembled to stratify risk, with a 36-fold gradient in mortality. Rates in the groups were as follows: 0.9%, 2.5%, 6.8%, 17.6%, and 35.9%. In the derivation set, as well as in the validation set, the simple score discriminated well, with c-statistics of 0.76 and 0.70, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An integer-based risk score can be used to predict in-hospital mortality after hepatic procedure for neoplasm, and may be useful for preoperative risk stratification and patient counseling.

Preoperative radiologic and postoperative pathologic risk factors for early intra-hepatic recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent curative resection

PURPOSE

The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence must be considered ahead of surgery. This study was undertaken to identify pre-operative risk factors for early intrahepatic recurrence of HCC after curative resection in a large-scale.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative three-phase multi-detector CT (MDCT) and laboratory data for 240 HCC patients who underwent curative resection; tumor size, number, gross shape, capsule integrity, distinctiveness of tumor margin, portal vein thrombosis (PVT), alpha-fetoprotein level (AFP), and protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II) levels were assessed. Surgical pathology was reviewed; tumor differentiation, capsule, necrosis, and micro-vessel invasion were recorded.

RESULTS

HCC recurred in 61 patients within six months (early recurrence group), but not in 179 patients (control group). In univariate analysis, large tumor size (p = 0.018), shape (p = 0.028), poor capsule integrity (p = 0.046), elevated AFP (p = 0.015), and PIVKA-II (p = 0.008) were significant preoperative risk factors. Among the pathologic features, PVT (p = 0.023), Glisson's capsule penetration (p = 0.033), microvascular invasion (p < 0.001), and poor differentiation (p = 0.001) showed statistical significance. In multivariate analysis, only the histopathologic parameters of microvascular invasion and poor differentiation achieved statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CT and laboratory parameters showed limited value, while the presence of microscopic vascular tumor invasion and poorly differentiated HCC correlated with higher risk of early recurrence after curative resection.

Surgical technique: new advancements for expanding indications and safety: the Western experience

The technical issues discussed herein represent part of the panorama of innovative approaches proposed for the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); in particular, the attention is focused on the recent advances in the field of planning the surgical strategy and performing liver dissection via ultrasound guidance. It is described how recent technical advances have allowed the range of scenarios for which surgery is indicated in liver cirrhosis patients with HCC to be widened. Indeed, the ability to spare the liver parenchyma with respect to liver inflow and outflow and its biliary drainage as well as to perform the anatomic removal of subsegmental portions of the liver has enabled surgeons to provide new therapeutic horizons, and will probably result in modifications to the therapeutic flow charts of HCC patients once the new horizons are fully accepted by nonsurgical specialists devoted to the treatment of these complex patients.

Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Local tumor control is still the most important consideration in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Surgical treatments, including liver resection and liver transplantation are, and will remain, the first-line therapeutic strategies for local control in patients with primary HCC. Although aggressive liver resection is often performed for advanced HCC in patients with a large tumor, multiple tumors, or tumors with vascular invasion, liver transplantation is the preferred option, after taking into consideration age and tumor-related factors, when there is poor liver functional reserve. Preventing deterioration in liver function is the second priority in the treatment of HCC. When performing liver resection, extensive removal of noncancerous liver parenchyma during lobectomy or hemihepatectomy, should be avoided as much as possible. Anatomic resection, which refers to systematic elimination of the main tumor with its minute metastases, preserves liver function and is highly recommended. A treatment algorithm based on published evidence is now available, which helps us decide on the most suitable therapeutic option for individual patients, depending on the tumor characteristics and liver functional reserve.

Human leukocyte antigen-G protein expression is an unfavorable prognostic predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma following curative resection

PURPOSE

Human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) is a tumor-associated immunosuppressive molecule involved in tumor escape mechanisms. The aim of this study is to elucidate its prognostic significance in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Immunohistochemical staining of HLA-G expression as well as tumor-infiltrating FoxP3+ regulatory (Tregs) and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells was carried out on tissue microarrays containing 173 HCC tissue specimens. Membrane-bound HLA-G1 protein expression in five human HCC cell lines was detected by Western blot.

RESULTS

HLA-G expression was associated with HCC prognosis, especially in early-stage diseases, with high expression independently associated with shortened overall survival (P = 0.041) and increased tumor recurrence (P = 0.023). HLA-G level was positively related to Tregs/CD8+ ratio and their combination served as a better prognosticator, patients having concurrent high levels of both variables at more than three times of risk of death and tumor relapse than those with concurrent low levels (both P < 0.001). In addition, HLA-G1 expression increased in a concordant manner with the increase of metastatic potential in human HCC cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

Overexpression of HLA-G protein in HCC was an independent indicator for poor outcome especially in early-stage disease. The combination of HLA-G expression and Tregs/CD8+ ratio added the prognostic power to both variables, offering a possible strategy of tumor-stroma interaction-oriented cancer immunotherapy.

Is liver resection justified in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma? Results of an observational study in 464 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The role of liver resection in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (multinodular or with macroscopic vascular involvement) is still controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of surgical resection compared to other therapeutic modalities in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Four hundred sixty four patients with HCC observed from 1991 to 2007 were included in the study. All the patients were evaluated for the treatment of HCC in relation to the severity of liver impairment and tumor stage. All the patients included in the study had no evidence of distant metastases.

RESULTS

Median follow up time for surviving patients was 25 months (range 1-155). Two-hundred and eighty-three patients were in Child-Pugh class A, 161 in class B, and 20 in class C. Two-hundred and seventy-one patients had single HCC, 121 patients had two or three HCCs, and 72 more than three HCCs. One-hundred and thirty-six patients (29.3%) were submitted to liver resection (LR), 232 (50.0%) to local ablative therapies (LAT) (ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, chemoembolization), eight (1.7%) to liver transplantation (LT), and 88 (19%) to supportive therapy (ST). Median survival time for all patients was 36 months (95% CI 24-36). Median survival time was 57 months for LR, 30 months for LAT, and 8 months for ST, with a 5-year survival of 47%, 20%, and 2.5%, respectively (p = 0.001). Actuarial 5-year survival for patients submitted to LT was 75%. Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with multiple HCCs compared to single HCC, with median survival times of 39, 16, and 11 months for patients with a single HCC, with two to three HCCs, and with more than three HCCs, respectively (p = 0.01). Survival for patients with single HCC was significantly longer in patients submitted to LR compared to LAT and ST with median survival times of 57, 37, and 14 months, respectively (p = 0.02). Also, in patients with multinodular HCCs (2-3 HCCs) LR showed the best results with a median survival time of 58 months compared to 22 and 8 months for LAT and ST (p = 0.01). In patients with more than three HCCs, LR did not show different results compared to LAT and ST. Seventy-three patients had evidence of macroscopic vascular involvement; median survival in this subgroup of patients was significantly shorter compared to patients without vascular involvement, 10 and 36 months, respectively. Survival for patients with macroscopic vascular involvement submitted to LR or LAT was significant longer compared to ST, with mean survivals of 27, 30, and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that the surgery can achieve good results in patients with single HCC and good liver function. Also, patients with multinodular HCCs (two to three nodules) could benefit from LR where survival is longer than after LAT or ST. In patients with more than three HCCs, LR have similar results of LAT. Macroscopic vascular invasion is a major prognostic factor, and the LR is justified in selected patients, where it can allow good long-term results compared to ST.

A randomized controlled trial of hepatectomy with adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus hepatectomy alone for Stage III A hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Hepatectomy is considered as the potentially curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and used in some selected Stage IIIA HCC, which include multiple tumors more than 5 cm or tumor involving a major branch of the portal or hepatic vein(s) (UICC TNM staging system, sixth edition). Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was used in retrospective studies to improve the survival outcome of resected HCC. However, its beneficial effect on the survival outcomes of the Stage IIIA patients has not been evaluated. The present study is to evaluate if hepatectomy combining with adjuvant TACE for Stage IIIA HCC result in better long-term survival outcome when compared with hepatectomy alone.

METHODS

From January 2001 to March 2004, we conducted a prospective randomized trial in patients with Stage IIIA HCC (NCT00652587), recruiting 115 Stage IIIA HCC patients to undergo hepatectomy with adjuvant TACE (HT arm) or to undergo hepatectomy alone (HA arm) in our cancer center. Survival outcomes of the two arms were analyzed.

RESULTS

The demographic data were well matched between the two arms. There were no significant differences in the morbidity and in-hospital mortality between the two arms of patients. The most significant toxicities associated with adjuvant TACE were nausea/vomiting (54.4%) and transient hepatic toxicity (elevation of aminotransferase, 52.6%). Although there was no significant difference in the rate of recurrence between the two arms (50/57 vs. 56/58, P = 0.094), HT arm seemed to have more proportion of single lesion of recurrent HCC (chi (2) = 3.719, P = 0.054) and more proportion of potential curative therapy for recurrence (chi (2) = 4.456, P = 0.035). Until the time of censor, 92 patients had died. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates and median overall survival for HT arm were 80.7, 33.3, 22.8% and 23.0 months, respectively. The corresponding overall survival rates and median overall survival for HA arm were 56.5, 19.4, 17.5% and 14.0 months, respectively. The difference was significant (stratified log-rank test, P = 0.048). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates and median disease-free survival for HT arm were 29.7, 9.3, 9.3% and 6.0 months, respectively; correspondingly, for HA arm were 14.0, 3.5, 1.7% and 4.0 months, respectively (stratified log-rank test, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

For Stage IIIA HCC, hepatectomy with adjuvant TACE efficaciously and safely improved survival outcomes when compared with hepatectomy alone.

Is hepatectomy beneficial in the treatment of multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Hepatectomy remains the standard treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its role in the treatment of multinodular HCC (MNHCC) is unknown.

METHODS

The study consisted of 599 patients undergoing curative hepatic resection for HCC between October 1990 and June 2006, in which 112 patients had MNHCC (tumor number > or = 2). The type of MNHCC was classified into: A, nodules involving one or two adjoining segments; B, large tumor with satellite nodules involving three or more segments; C, three or fewer nodules that are scattered in remote segments; and D, more than three separate tumors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the prognostic factors related to postoperative survival. During the same period of time, and from our database of 178 patients with pathologically proven MNHCC who were undergoing nonsurgical multidisciplinary therapy, 48 patients with serum albumin level > or = 3.5 g/dL, total bilirubin < 2 mg/dL, tumor number < or = 3, and tumor size < or = 5 cm were compared with 38 patients with the same condition treated with hepatectomy, in which 16 received one-block resection and 22 underwent multiple-site resection.

RESULTS

The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates for patients with single-tumor HCC and MNHCC were 88.0%, 69.2% and 58.4%, and 86.1%, 55.5% and 29.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). Alpha-fetoprotein > 400 ng/mL, total tumor size > 5 cm, largest tumor size > 5 cm, total tumor number > 3, microvascular invasion, non-A type MNHCC and multiple-site resection were poor prognostic factors for MNHCC in the hepatectomy group. Multivariate analysis revealed that only multiple-site hepatic resection was an independent adverse factor related to postoperative survival. In addition, patients who underwent one-block resection had significantly better survival compared with the nonsurgical group (p = 0.0016), but the multiple-site resection subgroup did not.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of MNHCC is poor in comparison with that of single-nodular HCC. Hepatectomy is the treatment of choice if the tumors can be removed by one-block resection and liver function reserve is acceptable.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Defining the place of surgery in an era of organ shortage

Liver resection (LR) and transplantation offer the only potential chance of cure for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Historically, all patients were treated by hepatic resection. With the advent of liver transplantation (LT) patients with HCC were preferentially placed on the waiting list for LT. However, early experience with LT was associated with a high rate of tumour recurrence and poor long-term survival. The increasing scarcity of donor livers resulted in restrictions being placed on tumour size, and an improvement in patient survival. To date there have been no randomised clinical trials comparing LR to LT. We review the evidence supporting LR and/or LT for HCC and discuss the role of neoadjuvant therapy. The decision of whether to resect or transplant remains debatable and is often determined by centre experience, availability of LT and donor organs.

Operative mortality after hepatic resection: are literature-based rates broadly applicable?

INTRODUCTION

Literature-based data on mortality after hepatectomy may be misleading, as poor outcomes are less likely to be published. The objective of the current study was to compare published vs public, nationally available mortality rates after hepatic resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic MEDLINE review was conducted to identify reports of hepatectomy outcome between January 1998-December 2004. Data were analyzed to calculate literature-based mortality rate and then compared with population-based mortality rate for hepatectomy using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset.

RESULTS

Twenty-three publications fulfilled screening criteria. The studies included 7,073 patients who had undergone hepatic resection (46.1% within USA vs 53.9% outside USA). Most patients were male (58.6%) with median age of 56 years. Indications for hepatic resection included hepatocellular carcinoma (47.7%), metastatic disease (34.3%), or other (18.1%). Cirrhosis was present in 23.2% of patients; 46.9% patients underwent either a hemi-hepatectomy or extended resection. The literature-based mortality rate was 3.6% (US centers only, 2.8%). Analysis of NIS revealed 11,429 hepatectomy cases. After controlling for gender, age, extent of hepatectomy, hepatocellular cancer diagnosis, and presence of cirrhosis, the adjusted NIS-based perioperative mortality rate for hepatectomy was 5.6% (95% CI, 5.0-6.2%). The relative mortality after hepatectomy was 1.6-fold higher based on population-based data compared with reports from the literature (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Actual population-based mortality rates for major liver resections may be higher than those reported in the literature. Informed consent should reflect actual local and national mortality rates rather than selective reports from the literature.

Persistent hepatitis B viral replication affects recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection

BACKGROUND

Elevated serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA increases the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Rather than instantaneous DNA level, the duration of persistent HBV replication is more important in carcinogenesis. Nevertheless, most investigators evaluated the DNA level at study entry. We assessed the effects of persistently detectable serum HBV DNA on HCC recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 230 consecutive patients undergoing curative resection between 2000 and 2006. Patients who had antiviral therapy (at diagnosis or during follow-up), fluctuating DNA (cut-off value: 100,000 copies/ml) or recurrence within 12 months of resection were excluded. Ultimately, 157 were enrolled: 89 (non-viraemia group) had consistently negative DNA (<100,000 copies/ml), while 68 (viraemia group) had consistently positive DNA (>100 000copies/ml). Serum DNA level, biochemical tests, alpha-foetoprotein (AFP) and liver dynamic computed tomography were obtained every 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, gender, liver function, histology, AFP, tumour stages or follow-up duration between the two groups. During follow-up (median: 35 months), patients in the non-viraemia group had a lower 5-year cumulative recurrence rate (54.7%) than those in the viraemia group (72.9%; P=0.043). In multivariate analysis, sustained viraemia (P=0.041) increased recurrence independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent viraemia increased recurrence independently after surgery. To prevent long-term recurrences, antiviral therapy should be initiated in those with detectable serum HBV DNA.

A novel prognostic nomogram is more accurate than conventional staging systems for predicting survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Prediction of survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains difficult. Numerous staging systems have been devised for purposes of risk classification; we sought to identify the optimal staging system to predict postoperative survival.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred eighty-four patients who underwent primary complete resection of HCC at our institution between 1989 and 2002 were classified according to 8 contemporary staging systems. The ability of these systems to predict relative survival for randomly selected pairs of patients was quantified using the Harrel's concordance index. A novel prognostic nomogram was constructed using prognostically relevant variables.

RESULTS

After a median followup of 46 months for surviving patients, the median overall survival was 38 months. The concordance indices for the existing staging systems ranged from 0.54 to 0.59. Only the 2002 American Joint Commission on Cancer system demonstrated a concordance index with a 95% confidence interval exceeding 0.5, indicating that the ability of conventional systems to predict relative survival of randomly selected pairs of patients was generally no better than chance. We developed a novel nomogram based on patient age, serum alpha-fetoprotein level, operative blood loss, resection margin status, tumor size, satellite lesions, and vascular invasion. The nomogram demonstrated a markedly superior concordance index of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.80). A separate nomogram for prediction of recurrence-free survival was also generated.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary staging systems for HCC do not accurately predict postoperative outcomes. Our prognostic nomogram provides a mechanism for accurate prediction of survival and risk stratification and will require validation at other hepatobiliary centers.

Factors predicting survival in advanced T-staged hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with reduction hepatectomy followed by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of reduction hepatectomy followed by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for advanced T-Staged hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 39 consecutive patients who underwent reduction hepatectomy followed by TACE for advanced T-Staged HCCs was undertaken.

RESULTS

Reduction hepatectomies, including 20 major ones, were performed. After a median interval of 30 days, the hepatectomies were followed by TACE using farmorubicin. Actual overall 3-year survival after surgery was 32%. Indocyanine green R(15) > or =15%, preoperative AFP > or =2000 ng/ml, and tumour reduction rate <98% were predictive of decreased overall survival. When the three prognostic factors were used in a scoring system, with one point assigned for each factor, the 3-year survival rates of patients with scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 71%, 40%, 0%, and 0% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction hepatectomy followed by TACE is effective in patients with advanced T-Staged HCCs who have none of the 3 poor prognostic factors. Reduction surgery followed by TACE is one of the options for controlling advanced T-Staged HCCs in patients who are not candidates for curative resection or TACE alone.

Outcomes of hepatic resection for a single large hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The proper role of surgical resection, given the various treatment modalities available, needs to be further clarified in patients with a single large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To evaluate the role of surgical resection in this group of patients, we studied the long-term outcomes of patients that received hepatic resection for a single large (> 5-10 cm in diameter) HCC.

METHODS

The clinicopathologic data and long-term outcomes of 61 patients with a single large HCC (> 5-10 cm in diameter; L group) were compared with those of 169 patients with a single small HCC (< or = 5 cm; S group). Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Operative mortality rates were low in both groups (0.6% in group S and 1.6% in group L), and the incidence of postoperative hepatic failure was rare even in group L (1.6%). The cumulative 5-year overall survival rate in group S was 59.0%, whereas in group L it was 52.9% (p = 0.385), and the corresponding cumulative 5-year disease-free survival rates were 44.1% and 31.7%, respectively (p = 0.063). Child class B was found to predict poor overall and disease-free survival by multivariate analysis versus Child class A in both groups. The presence of microvascular invasion was also identified as a significant prognostic factor, but it only affected disease-free survival in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Single large HCCs do not require a large extent of hepatic resection and the associated increased risk of postoperative liver failure. The long-term survival of patients with a single large HCC is as good as that of patients with a single small HCC. We conclude that hepatic resection is a safe and effective therapy for single large HCCs.

Long term outcome and prognostic factors for large hepatocellular carcinoma (10 cm or more) after surgical resection

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the role of surgery in treatment of large tumors (10 cm or more) is controversial. We have analyzed, in a single centre, the long-term outcome associated with surgical resection in patients with such large tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 166 patients who had undergone surgical resection between July 1995 and December 2006 because of large (10 cm or more) HCC. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 166 patients evaluated, 80% were associated with viral hepatitis and 48.2% had cirrhosis. The majority of patients underwent a major hepatectomy (48.2% had four or more segments resected and 9% had additional organ resection). The postoperative mortality was 3%. The median survival in our study was 20 months, with an actuarial 5-year and 10-year overall survival of 28.6% and 25.6%, respectively. Of these patients, 60% had additional treatment in the form of transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation or both. On multivariate analysis, vascular invasion (P < 0.001), cirrhosis (P = 0.028), and satellite lesions/multicentricity (P = 0.006) were significant prognostic factors influencing survival. The patients who had none of these three risk factors had 5-year and 10-year overall survivals of 57.7% each, compared with 22.5% and 19.3%, respectively, for those with at least one risk factor (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection for those with large HCC can be safely performed with a reasonable long-term survival. For tumors with poor prognostic factors, there is a pressing need for effective adjuvant therapy.

Liver resection for HCC with cirrhosis: surgical perspectives out of EASL/AASLD guidelines

EASL/AASLD guidelines clearly define indications for liver surgery for HCC: patients with single HCC and completely preserved liver function without portal hypertension. These guidelines exclude from operation many patients that could benefit from radical resection and that are daily scheduled for hepatectomy in surgical centers. Patients with large tumors or with portal vein thrombosis cannot be transplanted or treated by interstitial treatments. In selected cases liver resection may obtain good long-term outcomes, significantly better than non-curative therapies. In cases of multinodular HCC, liver transplantation is the treatment of choice within Milan criteria; patients beyond these limits can benefit from liver resection, especially if only two nodules are diagnosed: even if they have a worse prognosis, survival results after liver surgery are better than those reported after TACE or conservative treatments. EASL/AASLD guidelines excluded from operating patients with portal hypertension but data about this topic are not conclusive and further studies are necessary. Selected patients with mild portal hypertension could probably be scheduled for liver resection and, considering the shortage of donors, listing for transplantation could be avoided. In conclusion, guidelines for HCC treatment should consider good results of liver resection for advanced HCC, and indications for hepatectomy should be expanded in order not to exclude from radical therapy patients that could benefit from it.

Prognosis and results after resection of very large (>or=10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Few potentially curative treatment options exist besides resection for patients with very large (>or=10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We sought to examine the outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after resection of >or=10 cm HCC.

METHODS

Perioperative and long-term outcomes were examined for 189 consecutive patients from 1993 to 2004 who underwent potentially curative resection of HCC >or=10 cm (n = 24; 13%) vs. those with HCC <10 cm (n = 165; 87%). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 34 months. Tumors >or=10 cm were more likely to be symptomatic, of poorer grade, and have vascular invasion (p < 0.05). Twelve patients (50%) underwent an extended resection of more than four hepatic segments or resection of adjacent organs for oncologic clearance (diaphragm-2, inferior vena cava (IVC)-2, median sternotomy-1). Postoperative complications were more common after resection of >10 cm HCC (12/24, 50% vs. 35/165, 21%; p = 0.04). Median DFS was significantly shorter in patients with large HCC (>or=10 cm) group compared to patients with smaller HCC (8.4 vs. 38 months; p = 0.001), but overall survival was not different between the two groups (5-year survival 54% vs. 53%; p = 0.43). Seventeen patients (71%) with very large HCC developed recurrences (12 intrahepatic, five systemic); eight of these patients (47%) underwent additional therapy (resection-4, TACE-3, RFA-1). Pathological positive margins and vascular invasion were significant determinants of DFS in tumors >or=10 cm (p < 0.05), but only vascular invasion was an independent risk factor for recurrence after multivariate analysis (HR 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04-0.8). Median OS after recurrence was 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is the optimal therapy for very large (>or=10 cm) HCC. Although recurrences are common after resection of these tumors, overall survival was not significantly different from patients after resection of smaller HCC in this series.

Salvage hepatic resection after incomplete interstitial therapy for primary and secondary liver tumours

BACKGROUND

When the response to percutaneous ablation therapy (PAT) of liver tumours is incomplete, surgery may be undertaken as a salvage therapy. To validate the safety and effectiveness of salvage hepatectomy, patients who had undergone PAT or no treatment before hepatectomy were compared.

METHODS

Of 137 patients who had hepatectomy for primary and secondary tumours, 21 had undergone PAT and 116 had surgery as primary treatment. Tumour features and the incidence of liver cirrhosis were similar in the two groups.

RESULTS

Peroperative mortality and major morbidity rates were zero and 5 per cent (one of 21) respectively among patients who had PAT before surgery, and 0.9 per cent (one of 116) and zero in those who did not. Duration of operation (mean 495 versus 336 min; P<0.001), clamping time (mean 81 versus 53 min; P<0.001), blood loss (mean 519 versus 286 ml; P=0.004), need for blood transfusion (six of 21 patients versus nine of 116; P=0.001), and rates of thoracophrenolaparotomy (eight of 21 versus 14 of 116; P<0.001) and resection of other tissues (six of 21 versus nine of 116; P<0.001) were significantly higher in the PAT group.

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy after incomplete PAT is safe and effective, but more extensive procedures are necessary. The effect of salvage hepatectomy on long-term outcome is still unclear.

Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of anatomic resection on long-term outcomes in patients with pathologic T1-T2 (pT1-T2) hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 158 consecutive patients who underwent either anatomic (n = 95) or nonanatomic (n = 63) resection for pT1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma was conducted. Anatomic resection was defined as the complete removal of at least one Couinaud segment containing the tumor; nonanatomic resection was defined as removal of the tumor plus a rim of nonneoplastic liver parenchyma. The median follow-up time was 83 months.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent anatomic resection were characterized by lower prevalence of cirrhosis (P = .015), more favorable hepatic function (P = .001), larger tumor size (P = .029), and higher prevalence of vascular invasion (P = .008) compared with patients who underwent nonanatomic resection. Anatomic resection provided better survival (median survival time, 122 months) than nonanatomic resection (median survival time, 76 months; P = .0358). Patients who underwent anatomic resection had better disease-free survival (P = .0121). Anatomic resection independently improved both survival (hazard ratio, .46; P = .003) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, .55; P = .008). When stratified for pT classification, the effectiveness of anatomic resection remained only in patients with pT2 tumors in terms of survival (P = .0012) and disease-free survival (P = .0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma, probably because of the clearance of venous tumor thrombi within the resected domain.

Do young hepatocellular carcinoma patients have worse prognosis? The paradox of age as a prognostic factor in the survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Our previous study showed that male hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients below 40 years of age had the worst survival in the initial several years, but had the best prognosis thereafter. Thus, it seems that age has a paradoxical influence on the prognosis. To further clarify the issue of age on HCC prognosis, we initiated this study.

METHODS

A total of 11,312 HCC cases from seven medical centers from 1986 to 2002 were included. We analyzed the 1-year survival and survival after 1 year.

RESULTS

Male gender, age younger than 40 years old and hepatitis B virus (HBV) were associated with worse 1-year survival. In contrast, male gender, age younger than 40 years old and HBV were associated with better survival after 1 year. Higher percentage of the young HCC patients had a tumor size larger than 3 cm. 83.7% of HCC patients below 40 years of age were male and 89.8% of them were HBV carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

If we encountered a young HCC patient, the patient will probably be a male HBV carrier. He would probably have larger tumor and is more likely to expire within 1 year than the older HCC patients. However, if the young HCC patient can survive for more than 1 year, he would probably have better survival in the following years than the older patients.

Postresectional adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

The postresectional tumor recurrence rate is high in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tumor portal venous invasion is the most important factor related to recurrence. Adjuvant intraportal infusion chemotherapy (IPIC) was used in HCC patients to improve the outcomes.

METHODS

Between June 1998 and May 1999, 28 HCC patients (IPIC group) underwent postresectional IPIC daily for 2 days with 5-fluorouracil (650 mg/m(2)), leucovorin (45 mg/m(2)), doxorubicin (10 mg/m(2)), and cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles. Patient outcomes were compared with those of 66 matched HCC patients (control group) who underwent hepatectomy without adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

The IPIC group received an average of 5.2 cycles of chemotherapy, starting 5 to 24 days after surgery. The most frequent IPIC-related adverse events were upper abdominal pain, vomiting, and myelosuppression. Five-year disease-free and overall survival rates for the IPIC group were 44.6% and 60.7%, respectively. Subgroup analysis of patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I and II disease identified significantly lower recurrence rates for the IPIC group (33.3%) than the control group (65.0%; P = .025). For patients with stage I and II disease, 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates for the IPIC group (70.6% and 83.3%, respectively) were significantly higher than those of the control group (33.4% and 46.9%, respectively; P < .05). Patients with stage III disease do not benefit from IPIC.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative IPIC benefits HCC patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I and II disease. The survival advantages demonstrated justify a selection of patients for future trials.

Liver resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Liver resection and liver transplantation remain the only options for cure. Since the indications for orthotopic liver transplantation are limited, partial liver resection is the more common treatment. Recently, indications for liver resection have been expanded and there have been advances in the associated surgical techniques. This review describes the state-of-the-art of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Topics covered include: new indications, such as treatment of large tumors, bilobar tumors and those associated with vascular invasion; preoperative assessment of liver function; and surgical strategies. An overview of the most common staging systems, which are useful in predicting prognosis after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, is given.