Selective and mutational patterns associated with gene expression in humans: influences on synonymous composition and intron presence

Evidence for purifying selection against synonymous mutations in mammalian exonic splicing enhancers

Silent sites in mammals have classically been assumed to be free from selective pressures. Consequently, the synonymous substitution rate (Ks) is often used as a proxy for the mutation rate. Although accumulating evidence demonstrates that the assumption is not valid, the mechanism by which selection acts remain unclear. Recent work has revealed that the presence of exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs) in coding sequence might influence synonymous evolution. ESEs are predominantly located near intron-exon junctions, which may explain the reduced single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density in these regions. Here we show that synonymous sites in putative ESEs evolve more slowly than the remaining exonic sequence. Differential mutabilities of ESEs do not appear to explain this difference. We observe that substitution frequency at fourfold synonymous sites decreases as one approaches the ends of exons, consistent with the existing SNP data. This gradient is at least in part explained by ESEs being more abundant near junctions. Between-gene variation in Ks is hence partly explained by the proportion of the gene that acts as an ESE. Given the relative abundance of ESEs and the reduced rates of synonymous divergence within them, we estimate that constraints on synonymous evolution within ESEs causes the true mutation rate to be underestimated by not more than approximately 8%. We also find that Ks outside of ESEs is much lower in alternatively spliced exons than in constitutive exons, implying that other causes of selection on synonymous mutations exist. Additionally, selection on ESEs appears to affect nonsynonymous sites and may explain why amino acid usage near intron-exon junctions is nonrandom.

Evidence for selection on synonymous mutations affecting stability of mRNA secondary structure in mammals

BACKGROUND

In mammals, contrary to what is usually assumed, recent evidence suggests that synonymous mutations may not be selectively neutral. This position has proven contentious, not least because of the absence of a viable mechanism. Here we test whether synonymous mutations might be under selection owing to their effects on the thermodynamic stability of mRNA, mediated by changes in secondary structure.

RESULTS

We provide numerous lines of evidence that are all consistent with the above hypothesis. Most notably, by simulating evolution and reallocating the substitutions observed in the mouse lineage, we show that the location of synonymous mutations is non-random with respect to stability. Importantly, the preference for cytosine at 4-fold degenerate sites, diagnostic of selection, can be explained by its effect on mRNA stability. Likewise, by interchanging synonymous codons, we find naturally occurring mRNAs to be more stable than simulant transcripts. Housekeeping genes, whose proteins are under strong purifying selection, are also under the greatest pressure to maintain stability.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results provide evidence that, in mammals, synonymous sites do not evolve neutrally, at least in part owing to selection on mRNA stability. This has implications for the application of synonymous divergence in estimating the mutation rate.

Gametophytic selection in Arabidopsis thaliana supports the selective model of intron length reduction

Why do highly expressed genes have small introns? This is an important issue, not least because it provides a testing ground to compare selectionist and neutralist models of genome evolution. Some argue that small introns are selectively favoured to reduce the costs of transcription. Alternatively, large introns might permit complex regulation, not needed for highly expressed genes. This “genome design” hypothesis evokes a regionalized model of control of expression and hence can explain why intron size covaries with intergene distance, a feature also consistent with the hypothesis that highly expressed genes cluster in genomic regions with high deletion rates. As some genes are expressed in the haploid stage and hence subject to especially strong purifying selection, the evolution of genes in Arabidopsis provides a novel testing ground to discriminate between these possibilities. Importantly, controlling for expression level, genes that are expressed in pollen have shorter introns than genes that are expressed in the sporophyte. That genes flanking pollen-expressed genes have average-sized introns and intergene distances argues against regional mutational biases and genomic design. These observations thus support the view that selection for efficiency contributes to the reduction in intron length and provide the first report of a molecular signature of strong gametophytic selection.

Genes are odd things. Small proteins are often encoded by big genes. In the process, much of the excess material has to be cut out and thrown away. The size of the parts that are discarded (introns) differs greatly between genes. Why should this be so? The authors test three different ideas, making use of the unusual fact that in plants genes are expressed in pollen. As pollen has only one copy of every gene, natural selection is expected to work somewhat better. The authors find that the non-coding parts of genes that are especially active in pollen are particularly small. They also find that being active in pollen tends to make introns small. This provides strong support for the idea that small introns are the result of selection to reduce costs of making too much material that is only going to be thrown away.

Global mRNA stability is not associated with levels of gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster but shows a negative correlation with codon bias

A multitude of factors contribute to the regulation of gene expression in living cells. The relationship between codon usage bias and gene expression has been extensively studied, and it has been shown that codon bias may have adaptive significance in many unicellular and multicellular organisms. Given the central role of mRNA in post-transcriptional regulation, we hypothesize that mRNA stability is another important factor associated either with positive or negative regulation of gene expression. We have conducted genome-wide studies of the association between gene expression (measured as transcript abundance in public EST databases), mRNA stability, codon bias, GC content, and gene length in Drosophila melanogaster. To remove potential bias of gene length inherently present in EST libraries, gene expression is measured as normalized transcript abundance. It is demonstrated that codon bias and GC content in second codon position are positively associated with transcript abundance. Gene length is negatively associated with transcript abundance. The stability of thermodynamically predicted mRNA secondary structures is not associated with transcript abundance, but there is a negative correlation between mRNA stability and codon bias. This finding does not support the hypothesis that codon bias has evolved as an indirect consequence of selection favoring thermodynamically stable mRNA molecules.

Patterns of synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster genes with sex-biased expression

The nonrandom use of synonymous codons (codon bias) is a well-established phenomenon in Drosophila. Recent reports suggest that levels of codon bias differ among genes that are differentially expressed between the sexes, with male-expressed genes showing less codon bias than female-expressed genes. To examine the relationship between sex-biased gene expression and level of codon bias on a genomic scale, we surveyed synonymous codon usage in 7276 D. melanogaster genes that were classified as male-, female-, or non-sex-biased in their expression in microarray experiments. We found that male-biased genes have significantly less codon bias than both female- and non-sex-biased genes. This pattern holds for both germline and somatically expressed genes. Furthermore, we find a significantly negative correlation between level of codon bias and degree of sex-biased expression for male-biased genes. In contrast, female-biased genes do not differ from non-sex-biased genes in their level of codon bias and show a significantly positive correlation between codon bias and degree of sex-biased expression. These observations cannot be explained by differences in chromosomal distribution, mutational processes, recombinational environment, gene length, or absolute expression level among genes of the different expression classes. We propose that the observed codon bias differences result from differences in selection at synonymous and/or linked nonsynonymous sites between genes with male- and female-biased expression.

Intron size and exon evolution in Drosophila

We have found a negative correlation between evolutionary rate at the protein level (as measured by d(N)) and intron size in Drosophila. Although such a relation is expected if introns reduce Hill-Robertson interference within genes, it seems more likely to be explained by the higher abundance of cis-regulatory elements in introns (especially first introns) in genes under strong selective constraints.

Insertion/deletion and nucleotide polymorphism data reveal constraints in Drosophila melanogaster introns and intergenic regions

Our study of nucleotide sequence and insertion/deletion polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster noncoding DNA provides evidence for selective pressures in both intergenic regions and introns (of the large size class). Intronic and intergenic sequences show a similar polymorphic deletion bias. Insertions have smaller sizes and higher frequencies than deletions, supporting the hypothesis that insertions are selected to compensate for the loss of DNA caused by deletion bias. Analysis of a simple model of selective constraints suggests that the blocks of functional elements located in intergenic sequences are on average larger than those in introns, while the length distribution of relatively unconstrained sequences interspaced between these blocks is similar in intronic and intergenic regions.

Codon bias as a factor in regulating expression via translation rate in the human genome

We study the interrelations between tRNA gene copy numbers, gene expression levels and measures of codon bias in the human genome. First, we show that isoaccepting tRNA gene copy numbers correlate positively with expression-weighted frequencies of amino acids and codons. Using expression data of more than 14,000 human genes, we show a weak positive correlation between gene expression level and frequency of optimal codons (codons with highest tRNA gene copy number). Interestingly, contrary to non-mammalian eukaryotes, codon bias tends to be high in both highly expressed genes and lowly expressed genes. We suggest that selection may act on codon bias, not only to increase elongation rate by favoring optimal codons in highly expressed genes, but also to reduce elongation rate by favoring non-optimal codons in lowly expressed genes. We also show that the frequency of optimal codons is in positive correlation with estimates of protein biosynthetic cost, and suggest another possible action of selection on codon bias: preference of optimal codons as production cost rises, to reduce the rate of amino acid misincorporation. In the analyses of this work, we introduce a new measure of frequency of optimal codons (FOP'), which is unaffected by amino acid composition and is corrected for background nucleotide content; we also introduce a new method for computing expected codon frequencies, based on the dinucleotide composition of the introns and the non-coding regions surrounding a gene.