Treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide compared with placebo and methotrexate. Leflunomide Rheumatoid Arthritis Investigators Group

Purine biosynthetic pathway genes and methotrexate response in rheumatoid arthritis patients among north Indians

OBJECTIVE

Inter-individual variations to methotrexate (MTX) response among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have been attributed to clinical heterogeneity and genetic variations influencing MTX pharmacology. In this study, we analyzed the association of polymorphisms in ATIC, AMPD1, ADA, and ADORA2A from the purine biosynthetic pathway with MTX response in RA patients from north India. We also assessed the cumulative contribution of these polymorphisms together with those from the receptor-metabolizer-transporter and folate pathway genes that we have previously investigated.

METHODS

RA patients recruited using the American College of Rheumatology criteria were grouped into good (n = 213) and poor (n = 68) responders to MTX, based on Disease Activity Score 28-3. Individual single nucleotide polymorphism association was tested using (chi)2 test, and cumulative contribution of all the single-nucleotide polymorphisms and cumulative contribution of all the SNPs and clinico-demographic factors were assessed using linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS

G allele of ADA rs244076 [P = 0.02, odds ratio (95% confidence interval): OR (95% CI) = 1.66 (1.01-2.75)]; and T allele of ADORA2A rs5751876 [P = 0.04, OR (95% CI) = 1.55 (1.01-2.37)] were associated with poor response, but did not stand Bonferroni correction. On regression analyses, FPGS rs1544105, TYMS rs2853539, DHFR rs7387, and ADA rs244076 were identified as putative predictors for MTX response. Carriers of the FPGS rs1544105 AA and AG genotypes [OR (95% CI) = 3.47 (1.19-10.12)] and TYMS rs2853539 AA genotype [OR (95% CI) = 2.76 (1.50-5.07)] were predictors of poor response in our patient population.

CONCLUSION

Genes from all the three pathways seem to contribute to MTX response in the Indian population. However, these observations need to be replicated in an independent sample set.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: state of the art 2009

Few, if any, areas of medical therapeutics have witnessed such dramatic changes as those that have occurred in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the past two decades. Improvements in clinical trials methodologies, the introduction of no fewer than nine biologic agents with distinct mechanisms of action, and the development of better strategies for the use of such agents have all contributed to the new age in RA therapeutics. Here, we review these developments and attempt to describe the current landscape of RA therapy in terms of available treatments, agreed-upon principles of RA management, as well as some important controversies in this field. Despite the great pace at which developments are moving, a treatment-free remission for patients with RA remains an elusive goal and unmet medical needs remain. The quest for better therapies for this potentially devastating disease is still as important as ever; research in this exciting area is ongoing, and it is reasonable to hope that, during the next decade, developments will lead to improved, rationally designed, targeted therapies for RA.

A combination of methotrexate and zoledronic acid prevents bone erosions and systemic bone mass loss in collagen induced arthritis

Introduction

Osteoclasts play a key role in the pathogenesis of bone erosion and systemic bone mass loss during rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of methotrexate (MTX) and zoledronic acid (ZA), used alone or in combination, on osteoclast-mediated bone erosions and systemic bone mass loss in a rat model of collagen induced arthritis (CIA). We hypothesized that MTX and ZA could have an additive effect to prevent both bone erosion and systemic bone loss.

Methods

Arthritis was induced in 64 female Sprague-Dawley rats. After the clinical onset of CIA, rats were assigned to treatment with MTX (1 mg/kg/week), ZA (100 μg/kg twice weekly), both treatments at the same regimens, or vehicle. Arthritis score and paw thickness were recorded twice weekly. The rats were sacrificed on D28 and hind paws were removed for radiographic, histological and immunohistochemical analysis. The effects of treatments on osteoclastogenesis were determined by Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. Micro-CT of the tibia was carried out for histomorphometric analysis. Bone mass density was evaluated by densitometry.

Results

MTX significantly decreased the severity of CIA, whereas ZA slightly exacerbated it. When these two drugs were used in combination, MTX prevented the pro-inflammatory effect of ZA. The combination of ZA with MTX was more effective than MTX alone for reducing structural joint damage with a dramatic decrease of osteoclasts' number in the eroded joints. However, MTX alone also significantly reduced the number of osteoclasts and the number of CD68+ mononuclear cells. ZA alone, or ZA with MTX, significantly increased the systemic bone mass density measured by densitometry and bone volume on histomorphometric analysis.

Conclusions

A combination of MTX and ZA prevented both bone erosion and systemic bone loss in a rat model of arthritis. Both treatments independently decreased the number of osteoclasts in the eroded joint. However, while MTX probably acts mainly through a decrease of inflammation, ZA has a direct effect on osteoclasts, allowing a dramatic down-regulation of these cells in inflamed joints. These two different mechanisms of action provide support for the use of a combination of these two drugs to improve the prevention of structural joint damage in RA.

Comparative effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in combination with either methotrexate or leflunomide

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a combination of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors with either methotrexate or leflunomide in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Data from 1769 outpatients enrolled in the German biologics register RABBIT who were treated with one of the TNFalpha inhibitors adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab in combination with either methotrexate (n = 1375) or leflunomide (n = 394) were included in the analysis. Clinical status including disease activity as well as treatment data were documented by the treating rheumatologist at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients treated with a combination of biologics with leflunomide had significantly higher baseline disease activity than those treated with methotrexate. The highest disease activity was found for patients treated with the combination infliximab/leflunomide. After 36 months, the discontinuation rates were 46.3%, 51.3% and 61.5% for combinations of etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab with methotrexate and 53.4%, 63.1% and 67.1% for combinations with leflunomide, respectively. European League Against Rheumatism response rates after 24 months ranged from 74% to 81% for combinations with methotrexate and 72% to 81% for combinations with leflunomide.

CONCLUSION

The current clinical practice is to use methotrexate as a first choice for the combination with TNFalpha antagonists. In a number of patients methotrexate has to be replaced by another disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Our data support the view that leflunomide is a useful alternative if methotrexate is contraindicated.

Genetic polymorphisms in folate pathway enzymes as a possible marker for predicting the outcome of methotrexate therapy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Low-dose methotrexate (MTX) therapy is widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Though the difference in response to MTX between patients with RA is large, the factors that contribute to this variability remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify those factors with a particular emphasis on the pharmacogenetics of MTX.

METHOD

We evaluated the association of possible factors, including genetic polymorphisms of folate metabolic pathway enzymes, with the cumulative value of C-reactive protein, an index of MTX anti-inflammatory efficacy, in 87 Japanese patients with RA.

RESULTS

Polymorphisms of the reduced folate carrier gene (RFC) G80A and of the gamma-glutamylhydrolase gene (GGH) C-401T were more closely associated (beta = 2.1194, P = 0.0017) than other polymorphisms, with the anti-inflammatory response to MTX.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RA having RFC 80A and GGH-401T alleles were less responsive to MTX than those with RFC 80A and without GGH-401T alleles. Thus, this data may be useful for guiding treatment of RA patients with MTX.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha -308 gene locus promoter polymorphism: an analysis of association with health and disease

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is a potent immunomediator and proinflammatory cytokine that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a large number of human diseases. The location of its gene within major histocompatibility complex and biological activities has raised the possibility that polymorphisms within this locus may contribute to the pathogenesis of wide range of autoimmune and infectious diseases. For example, a bi-allelic single nucleotide substitution of G (TNFA1 allele) with A (TNFA2 allele) polymorphism at -308 nucleotides upstream from the transcription initiation site in the TNF-alpha promoter is associated with elevated TNF-alpha levels and disease susceptibilities. However, it is still unclear whether TNF-alpha -308 polymorphism plays a part in the disease process, in particular whether it could affect transcription factor binding and in turn influence TNF-alpha transcription and synthesis. Several studies have suggested that TNFA2 allele is significantly linked with the high TNF-alpha-producing autoimmune MHC haplotype HLA-A1, B8, DR3, with elevated serum TNF-alpha levels and a more severe outcome in diseases. This review discusses the genetics of the TNF-alpha -308 polymorphism in selected major diseases and evaluates its common role in health and disease.

Etanercept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients with chronic kidney failure on predialysis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with chronic kidney failure are intolerant to most disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and NSAIDs due to their potential toxicities. Although the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have emerged as a highly effective treatment for RA, their safety and efficacy in RA patients with chronic kidney failure have not been well reported. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of etanercept treatment in RA patients with chronic kidney failure. We describe three RA patients with chronic kidney failure who had been treated with DMARDs, steroids and NSAIDs, but were discontinued from these classical agents due to several side effects and nephrotoxicity. The patients were treated with 25 mg of etanercept once or twice a week. We evaluated disease activity and used decreasing renal function and increasing number of infections to monitor safety. All three patients improved after starting etanercept treatment and their steroid requirements were decreased. Linear relationships between Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation (MDRD) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and time were observed. Thus, in all patients, the changes in GFR did not represent superimposed acute drug toxicity, but rather chronic progressive renal failure. These cases show that etanercept may be a safe and effective treatment option for RA patients with chronic kidney failure.

Factors associated with fatal outcome of leflunomide-induced lung injury in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the factors associated with poor prognosis of LEF-induced lung injury in patients with RA.

METHODS

The background and clinical and laboratory features of LEF-induced lung injury were examined and compared between patients who died of and who recovered from it.

RESULTS

Among 22 patients who developed LEF-induced lung injury, 9 died of and 13 recovered from it. The patients who died tended to have pre-existing interstitial pneumonia (8/9 vs 6/13, P = 0.07). The loading and maintenance doses, serum concentration of the LEF metabolite A771726 and administration period did not differ between the groups. Patients who died had more frequently hypoxaemia of <60 Torr and mechanical ventilation, and had a high serum CRP level (19.3 +/- 9.4 vs 10.1 +/- 8.1 mg/dl, P = 0.03) and a low albumin level (2.7 +/- 0.6 vs 3.3 +/- 0.5 g/dl, P = 0.03) at the lung injury onset. The peripheral blood lymphocyte count decreased in both groups at the lung injury onset, and it remained low until fatal outcome, in contrast to a re-increase upon recovery (406 +/- 394 vs 1203 +/- 399/microl, P = 0.006). The main histopathological finding in two autopsied patients was diffuse alveolar damage, in contrast to the alveolitis observed in a biopsied patient who recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-existing interstitial pneumonia, extremely high serum CRP and low albumin levels, severe hypoxaemia and mechanical ventilation indicated poor prognosis. Peripheral blood lymphocytopenia developed in association with lung injury, and a sustained low lymphocyte count indicated a fatal outcome.

Long-term efficacy of leflunomide on disease activity and inhibition of joint damage: retrospective comparison with methotrexate for Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients

We retrospectively compared treatment impact with leflunomide (LEF) or methotrexate (MTX) on retarding joint damage and clinical symptom including a 28-joint-count Disease Activity Score/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) between two similar groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over an approximately 3-year treatment. One group included 29 patients treated with LEF alone (average dose 16.1 mg/day); the other group included 26 patients treated with MTX (average dose 7.4 mg/week) alone or combined with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. At baseline, mean disease duration was 7.1 and 6.9 years, and mean DAS28-ESR was 5.79 and 5.69, respectively. The average DAS28-ESR improvement of 1.750 (from 5.79 to 4.04) in the LEF-treated group was significantly greater than the effect of 1.007 (from 5.69 to 4.68) seen in the MTX group (P = 0.0455), with the same results being observed on European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Annual changes observed in Larsen score in total joints were 0.030 in the LEF group and 0.085 in the MTX group: LEF retards joint damage significantly better than MTX (P = 0.003). This inhibitory effect was better in small joints (P = 0.004) than in middle and large joints (P = 0.075). A negative correlation was noticed between improved DAS28-ESR and the progression of joint damage in the LEF group (r = -0.7068, P < 0.0001), whereas there was no correlation in the MTX group (r = -0.0311, P = 0.882). In daily clinical practice, LEF showed significant clinical and radiological improvement compared with the standard MTX regimen in Japan.

IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF gene polymorphisms do not affect the treatment outcome of rheumatoid arthritis patients with leflunomide

Leflunomide is an isoxazole derivative that is structurally and functionally unrelated to other known immunomodulatory drugs. Previous studies have revealed that therapy with leflunomide causes decreased production of mediators such as IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha, which are involved in inflammatory process. The aim of the present study was to examine whether the polymorphisms in genes IL1B, IL6, and TNF may affect treatment outcomes in RA patients treated with leflunomide. The study was carried out on 129 patients (106 women, 23 men, mean age 52.9 +/- 11.03) diagnosed with RA and treated with leflunomide 20 mg daily. Clinical improvement was evaluated according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% and 50% response criteria. There were no statistically significant associations between the studied genotypes and improvement of disease activity parameters. The results of the present study suggest that IL1beta, IL6, and TNF gene polymorphisms are not significant factors influencing the therapy outcome of RA patients with leflunomide.

The effect of exon (19C>A) dihydroorotate dehydrogenase gene polymorphism on rheumatoid arthritis treatment with leflunomide

OBJECTIVE

Leflunomide is an isoxazole derivative structurally and functionally unrelated to other known immunomodulatory drugs. The main molecular target of leflunomide is dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), a key enzyme of de novo pyrimidine synthesis. The human DHODH gene sequence is highly conserved and contains only one common missense polymorphism in the coding regions. This SNP (refSNP ID: rs3213422) is localized in the first exon of the DHODH gene (19C>A) and leads to Gln7Lys amino acid substitution in the cationic N-terminal region of the DHODH polypeptide, and it has not yet been investigated in relation to enzyme activity or DHODH inhibitor efficacy. The aim of the study was to examine the effect of this polymorphism on leflunomide treatment outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

The study was carried out on 147 patients (123 women, 24 men, mean age: 52.8 +/- 11.03 years) diagnosed with RA and treated with leflunomide 20 mg daily. Clinical improvement was evaluated according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% and 50% response criteria.

RESULTS

The frequency of remission was increased in C allele carriers compared with patients with the A allele.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that DHODH polymorphism may be associated with leflunomide treatment outcome in RA patients.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of abatacept in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has undergone an impressive transformation over the past few decades. Further understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease process has resulted in the development of biologic agents that target proinflammatory cytokines and both B and T lymphocytes. By blocking an important costimulatory pathway, abatacept leads to a dramatic reduction in T cell stimulation and proliferation. Multiple clinical trials have revealed consistent benefit with regards to clinical and radiographic efficacy, quality of life, and disability in patients suffering from RA who have had inadequate responses to methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. The possibility of remission when used early in the disease course has also been demonstrated. Importantly, abatacept has been very well tolerated with a low rate of serious infections and no apparent increase in malignancies to date. Continued surveillance of the benefits and risks will help to better define its place amongst the other biologic agents in the treatment of RA.

Treatment options in patients with rheumatoid arthritis failing initial TNF inhibitor therapy: a critical review

Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as methotrexate are the mainstay of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. More recently, biologic agents such as etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, which act by inhibiting tumour necrosis factor (TNF), have become available. TNF inhibitors have proved to be very effective in patients not responding to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. However, about 20% to 40% of patients treated with a TNF inhibitor fail to achieve a 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria, and more lose response over time (secondary failure or acquired therapeutic resistance) or experience adverse events following treatment with a TNF inhibitor. In this group of patients, therapeutic options were limited until recently and an established treatment approach was to switch from one TNF inhibitor to another. In recent years, therapeutic options in these patients have increased with the introduction of biologic agents with novel mechanisms of action, such as rituximab and abatacept. This review outlines the current evidence in support of the available treatment strategies in patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to an initial TNF inhibitor.

Understanding Personalized Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Clinician's Guide to the Future

Personalized medicine refers to the utilization of technologies at the molecular level to understand disease processes and improve health outcomes. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) some factors associated with disease outcome have been identified. These factors have not yet been integrated into a clinically useful tool to predict disease outcome in individual patients. Developments in pharmacogenomics are moving the field forward quite rapidly. Genetic variants, which may have a role in drug metabolism mediating either drug response or toxicity, have been identified for both traditional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents. Choosing a medication based on a patient's characteristics (sociodemographic, clinical, genetic) will result in better utilization of resources and better clinical outcomes. The ethical, political, and legal implications of personalized medicine need to be considered as well.

Metaanalysis of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms affecting methotrexate toxicity

OBJECTIVE

Methotrexate (MTX) is an effective therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but it is also associated with toxicity. Pharmacogenetics is the systematic evaluation of the role of genetic differences in the efficacy and toxicity of therapeutic interventions. Because the results of small pharmacogenetic studies are often misleading, we undertook a metaanalysis of published studies to determine the role of polymorphisms in the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of MTX.

METHODS

A search of PubMed produced 55 publications, which were then reviewed for relevance to MTX toxicity and efficacy in patients with RA. To ensure that no study was missed, each polymorphism found was then entered as an independent search string and all results were reviewed again.

RESULTS

Only 2 polymorphisms [C677T and A1298C in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR); total 8 studies] relevant to MTX metabolism and efficacy had sufficient data to allow a metaanalysis of their association with toxicity; there was no polymorphism with sufficient data to perform a metaanalysis of efficacy. In a fixed-effects model, the C677T polymorphism was associated with increased toxicity (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.32-2.21, p < 0.001). The A1298C polymorphism was not associated with increased toxicity (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.79-1.6, p = 0.626).

CONCLUSION

As pharmacogenetics evolves, more data are needed to assess the role of various polymorphisms for drug efficacy and toxicity. These results illustrate the paucity of reliable pharmacogenetic data on a commonly used antirheumatic drug and the potential role of pharmacogenetics in tailoring drug therapy for an individual patient.

Randomized controlled trial design in rheumatoid arthritis: the past decade

Much progress has occurred over the past decade in rheumatoid arthritis trial design. Recognized challenges have led to the establishment of a clear regulatory pathway to demonstrate efficacy of a new therapeutic. The use of pure placebo beyond 12 to 16 weeks has been demonstrated to be unethical and thus background therapy and/or early rescue has become regular practice. Goals of remission and 'treating to targets' may prove more relevant to identify real-world use of new and existing therapeutics. Identification of rare adverse events associated with new therapies has resulted in intensive safety evaluation during randomized controlled trials and emphasis on postmarketing surveillance and use of registries.

Can clinical factors at presentation be used to predict outcome of treatment with methotrexate in patients with early inflammatory polyarthritis?

PURPOSE

Methotrexate (MTX) is the first choice conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for rheumatoid arthritis. It is not universally effective, however; although to date it is not possible to predict with any accuracy which patients will respond to treatment. The aim of this analysis was to examine whether clinical and genetic variables could be used to predict response to MTX.

METHODS

Patients recruited to the Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR), a primary care based inception cohort of patients with inflammatory polyarthritis, were eligible for this analysis if they were commenced on MTX as their first DMARD within 3 months of their baseline visit and had at least 2 years of follow-up data. Outcome on MTX was defined as: (1) stopped for adverse events; (2) stopped for inefficacy or second DMARD added; (3) stopped for other reasons; or (4) remained on MTX monotherapy. Multiple logistic regression was used to establish which variables (including demographics, disease activity and Health Assessment Questionnaire score) predicted stopping monotherapy for inefficacy or adverse event (with those remaining on treatment taken as the referent category). The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curves (AUC ROC), were used to determine how accurate the model was at predicting outcome.

RESULTS

309 patients were included in this analysis. At 1 year (2 years), 34 (46) patients had stopped for adverse events and 25 (49) had either stopped monotherapy for inefficacy or had a second DMARD added. 231 (188) patients remained on MTX monotherapy. The strongest predictor of inefficacy at both time points was shared epitope positivity: odds ratios (OR) 5.8 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.3 to 25.6) at 1 year, OR 3.0 (95% CI 1.3 to 7.3) at 2 years. High Health Assessment Questionnaire score (OR 1.84 95% CI 1.12 to 3.01) and female gender (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.92 to 5.28) were associated with adverse events on MTX at 1 year. However, even the most optimal combinations of the factors analysed were only weakly predictive of treatment outcome: AUC ROC for adverse events 0.68 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.78) and for inefficacy AUC ROC 0.71 (95% CI 0.6 to 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Within this cohort, routine clinical and laboratory factors were poor at predicting outcome of treatment with MTX. Given the major therapeutic advantage to be derived from accurate prediction of treatment outcome, further studies will need to investigate novel biological and other markers.

Decreased external home help use with improved clinical status in rheumatoid arthritis: an exploratory analysis of the Abatacept in Inadequate responders to Methotrexate (AIM) trial

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between external home help (EHH) use (ie, help provided by someone other than family or friends) and clinical response and patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to determine whether abatacept treatment in addition to methotrexate reduces the need for EHH.

METHODS

EHH use was recorded monthly in the Abatacept in Inadequate responders to Methotrexate (AIM) trial, a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of abatacept in patients with active RA also receiving methotrexate. Clinical response was defined using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria, and Disease Activity Scale (DAS)-28 score. Patient-reported outcomes included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 100-mm visual analog scales (VASs) for pain and fatigue, and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for health-related quality of life. Analysis of covariance and regression analysis were performed to investigate the relationship between change in EHH use and both clinical response and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 590 patients enrolled in the study, 232 (39.3%) were receiving EHH at baseline (mean age, 50.2 years; 88% female; 85% white; mean duration of RA, 8.8 years; mean [SD] EHH use, 15.6 [11.3] days). The level of EHH use was consistently higher with poorer scores on the HAQ, pain and fatigue VASs, DAS28, and SF-36. At 12 months, the mean reduction from baseline in EHH use was significantly greater in patients with ACR-50 or ACR-70 clinical response, EULAR good or moderate response, DAS28 remission, and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes. On multiple regression analysis, change in SF-36 Physical Functioning subscale score was the most important contributor to change in EHH after adjustment for other variables. The mean reduction from baseline in EHH use was significantly greater with abatacept compared with placebo over the study period (all, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this exploratory analysis of data from patients with active RA from the AIM trial, EHH use was decreased significantly with improvements in clinical response, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes. Treatment with abatacept in addition to methotrexate was associated with significantly decreased EHH use, suggesting that abatacept may have been associated with improved function and increased physical independence in these patients with RA.

Induction treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis with leflunomide combined with prednisone: a prospective multi-centre observational study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis, a prospective multi-centre observational study was conducted. Patients with biopsy proven proliferative lupus nephritis were assigned to receive either leflunomide or cyclophosphamide with concomitant prednisone. Leflunomide was given orally with a loading dose of 1 mg/kg/day for 3 days followed by 30 mg/day. Intravenous cyclophosphamide was administered monthly at a dose of 0.5 g/m2 of body-surface area. A total of 110 patients were enrolled, 70 in the leflunomide group and 40 in the cyclophosphamide group. The complete remission rate in the leflunomide group was 21% and partial remission rate 52%, as compared with 18% and 55%, respectively, in the cyclophosphamide group. Renal parameters and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index improved significantly and similarly in both groups. Serum creatinine decreased or stabilized in both treatment groups. No significant difference was noted with respect to clinical outcome between groups. Repeat biopsy also showed a significant reduction of active lesions in kidney pathology after 6 months of leflunomide treatment. Major adverse events, similar in both treatment groups, included infection, alopecia and hypertension. Leflunomide, compared with cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisone was effective in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis and was generally well-tolerated.

Limits of add-on trials: antirheumatic drugs

PURPOSE

This paper assesses the design of clinical studies used in the process of regulatory approval, focusing on how add-on studies affect regulatory decisions.

METHODS

The sample case taken is that of the new agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) authorised by the European Medicine Agency (EMEA). The European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs) accompanying the marketing authorisations were the source of information on the studies presented in the registration dossiers.

RESULTS

The recently approved anti-RA agents are all indicated in combination with methotrexate (MTX) for treating adults with active RA who have responded inadequately to disease-modifier drugs (DMARDs). The add-on design was frequently used in registration studies. For infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab and rituximab, add-on trials contributed, together with parallel-group trials, to gaining the approval as combination therapy. Anakinra and abatacept were authorised on the basis of add-on trial results only.

CONCLUSIONS

Add-on trials do not allow assessment of the intrinsic efficacy and safety of new agents and their value as alternatives to available treatments. The indications granted for the new anti-RA agents do not specify whether newer drugs can replace standard treatments in nonresponders, can do better in the overall patient population or can be used as first-line treatment.

Polymorphisms within the adenosine receptor 2a gene are associated with adverse events in RA patients treated with MTX

OBJECTIVE

To examine the role of adenosine receptor 2a gene (ADORA2a) polymorphisms on outcome of MTX treatment in RA.

METHODS

Subjects included 309 RA patients with a defined response to MTX. Patients were included if they were (i) good responders (n = 147) (ESR <20 for >6/12 on stable dose of MTX) (ii) inefficacy failures (n = 101) (physician statement and failure to reduce ESR/CRP by 20%) or (iii) adverse event (AE) failures (n = 61) (verified by medical record review). AEs were sub-divided into gastrointestinal (GI) (n = 24), abnormal LFTs (n = 20) or other (n = 17). 8 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within ADORA2a were genotyped using the Sequenom MALDI-TOF platform.

RESULTS

Five SNPs within ADORA2a were associated with stopping MTX for AEs (OR 2.1-3.07, P < 0.05 for all). Analysis by AE type showed that the association was specific for GI toxicity. No association was observed between ADORA2a and inefficacy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Genetic variation within ADORA2a is significantly associated with AEs on MTX, specifically GI AEs. Knowledge of the ADORA2a genotype may help to improve identification of patients at high risk of GI toxicity with MTX.

An update on methotrexate pharmacogenetics in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disorder that mainly affects the joints. When left untreated, the disease can result in irreversible joint damage with high morbidity and mortality. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are the cornerstones of treatment in RA. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs not only ameliorate the clinical signs and symptoms of disease, but also prevent the radiographic progression of joint damage. Methotrexate is one such disease-modifying antirheumatic drug that has been used in the treatment of RA for over two decades with excellent long-term efficacy and safety. However, there is significant variability in patients' response to methotrexate, both in terms of efficacy and toxicity. At the present time, there are no reliable means of predicting, a priori, an individual patient's response to methotrexate. In this review, recent published literature on the pharmacogenetics of methotrexate in RA is highlighted. Pharmacogenetics may be a powerful tool for optimizing methotrexate therapy in patients with RA.

Proposals for leflunomide use to avoid lung injury in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Among the 5,043 consecutive patients registered in the postmarketing surveillance for leflunomide, 61 were reported to have lung injury and 24 died from it. The adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis of the risk factors showed that preexisting interstitial lung disease posed the greatest risk, as well as loading dose, smoking history, and low body weight of 40 kg or less with odds ratios of 8.17, 3.97, 3.12, and 2.91, respectively. In 12 patients, lung injury developed even 2 months after leflunomide withdrawal. When patients with (n=9) and without (n=13) fatal outcome were compared, eight out of the former, and six out of the latter had preexisting interstitial lung disease; the former showed severe hypoxemia, high serum C-reactive protein level, hypoalbuminemia, and continuous lymphocytopenia, and required mechanical ventilation. On the basis of these results and literature review, the committee proposes that leflunomide should only be recommended as a second-line drug, should not be administered to patients with preexisting interstitial lung disease, should also not be administered to patients with smoking history or those with low body weight, and should be administered without loading dose. Careful monitoring is necessary, and when lung injury develops, leflunomide elimination using colestyramine is mandatory.

Therapeutic T-cell manipulation in rheumatoid arthritis: past, present and future

Accumulating evidence suggests that RA is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Early attempts at disease modulation using strategies such as CD4 mAbs were severely hampered by a lack of biomarkers of autoreactivity. Recently, however, co-stimulation blockade has emerged as an effective treatment for RA. Alongside a greatly improved mechanistic understanding of immune regulation, this has rekindled hopes for authentic and robust immune programming. The final pieces of the jigsaw are not yet in place for RA but, in other disciplines, emerging treatment paradigms such as non-mitogenic anti-CD3 mAbs, autoantigenic peptides and even cellular therapies are providing hope for a future in which immunopathology can be specifically and vigorously curtailed.

Hypertension in rheumatoid arthritis

RA associates with an increased burden of cardiovascular disease, which is at least partially attributed to classical risk factors such as hypertension (HT) and dyslipidaemia. HT is highly prevalent, and seems to be under-diagnosed and under-treated among patients with RA. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms that may lead to increased blood pressure in such patients, paying particular attention to commonly used drugs for the treatment of RA. We also suggest screening strategies and management algorithms for HT, specific to the RA population, although it is clear that these need to be formally assessed in prospective randomized controlled trials designed specifically for the purpose, which, unfortunately, are currently lacking.

Leflunomide-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus with erythema multiforme-like lesions

Leflunomide is an immunosuppressive agent that acts by inhibiting pyrimidine synthesis in lymphocytes and other rapidly proliferating cells, as well as by suppressing tumor necrosis factor-α–induced cellular responses. A number of leflunomide-related adverse events have been reported. Among cutaneous side effects, a few cases of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus have been described. We report a previously undocumented reaction to leflunomide, manifesting as subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and erythema multiforme-like lesions, in a young woman treated with this drug for ankylosing spondylitis. Withdrawal of leflunomide combined with a short cycle of systemic corticosteroid led to the resolution of the patient’s rash, indicating this drug as being responsible for the development of the disease. We conclude that leflunomide might have triggered the occurrence of both subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and erythema multiforme in a patient with pre-existing autoimmune diathesis. The suppressive effect of this drug on tumor necrosis factor-α–related mechanisms might have played a role in the induction of such a unique reaction to leflunomide.

Safety of biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases: focus on rituximab

OBJECTIVES

To review the safety of biologic agents used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune diseases, with a focus on rituximab.

METHODS

Information was gathered from a search of the PubMed database and from major congress abstract listings through June 2007.

RESULTS

Rituximab is approved for treating RA in patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors and is under study in other indications for RA and other autoimmune disorders. The current safety profile of rituximab in RA is known from Phase II and III studies conducted preapproval, treating approximately 750 patients, as well as from long-term extension studies with repeated therapy. Clinical trials have established that the most common adverse events are infusion-associated reactions, seen in 29 to 40% of patients, most of which are mild to moderate and occur following the first rituximab infusion, with incidence and severity decreasing with subsequent infusions. Rates of infections and serious infections to date are within the range expected for RA patients treated with other biologic agents, but the longer term effects of B-cell depletion and the effects of repeated treatment on the risk of infections are uncertain. Information is limited for rituximab safety in other autoimmune disorders but current data do not suggest that there is a significant difference in adverse events from that previously reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab is an important addition to the rheumatologist's armamentarium for the treatment of difficult RA and ongoing trials will determine its utility in other indications for RA and other autoimmune conditions. The true safety profile of rituximab will emerge as larger numbers of patients are treated in routine clinical practice.

Treatment-related improvement in physical function varies with duration of rheumatoid arthritis: a pooled analysis of clinical trial results

BACKGROUND

Physical function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has reversible and irreversible components, and is typically assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ). Since irreversible components are expected to increase with longer duration of RA and reduce the ability for improvement in physical function, we analysed responsiveness of HAQ scores in patient populations with differing RA durations in randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Data from all RCTs published between 1980 and 2005 that reported changes from baseline in HAQ at 6 and/or 12 months were analysed. Treatments were grouped as "biologics", or "traditional" disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and "placebo". We computed effect sizes of HAQ in each trial, and contrasted the association between these effects and duration of RA among treatment groups using regression models.

RESULTS

We identified 42 RCTs with complete data for the statistical models. The models indicate that discrimination of functional improvement between active drug groups and placebo is reduced in patients with a longer duration of RA (p = 0.02 for the change in discrimination over time). The placebo-adjusted HAQ responses decreased on average by 0.37 per year of RA duration.

CONCLUSION

Responsiveness in HAQ scores is inversely associated with mean disease duration in RA. This impacts assessment of physical function, a key outcome measure in RCTs and practice, and impacts the ability to discriminate active treatment from placebo.