Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver

An algorithm for the accurate identification of benign liver lesions

BACKGROUND

Benign liver lesions may be difficult to characterize preoperatively. In most instances, determination of the etiology of a hepatic mass makes its management decisions clear-cut. We present our experience using an algorithm for the management of liver masses of suspected benign or uncertain pathology and highlight this approach along with our surgical experience in benign liver lesions.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients underwent hepatectomy with a preoperative diagnosis of benign disease or unknown etiology from December 1992 to February 2002. Patients were preoperatively assessed with computed tomography, along with other imaging studies, as indicated. Final pathology was reviewed to confirm the preoperative diagnosis.

RESULTS

Ninety-two percent (65 of 71) were correctly characterized preoperatively. Diagnosis was inaccurate in 6 patients. Of these patients, final pathology revealed focal nodular hyperplasia in 4 patients. The remaining 2 patients, who had adenoma, were found to harbor malignancy within the surgical specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

An algorithm to manage liver lesions resulted in a high diagnostic accuracy of a preoperative evaluation. Hepatic resection for benign disease can be performed with low morbidity and mortality and is highly successful in achieving relief for symptomatic patients.

Clinical significance of early hepatocellular carcinoma

Early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is defined as a well-differentiated cancer containing Glisson's triad, but it remains unknown whether this lesion is curable by surgery. We studied 70 patients who had a single HCC smaller than 2 cm in diameter (Stage T1) and who underwent curative hepatectomy and long-term follow-up. Based on our typing system, the tumors were assigned as early HCC (n=15), overt HCC (n=52), and non-HCC tumor (n=3). The rate of microscopic regional spread was lower in early HCCs than in overt HCCs (7% vs. 42%; P=.01). After a median follow-up of 6.3 years, both overall survival and recurrence-free survival in the early HCC group were significantly better than those in the overt HCC group (P=.01; P=.001, respectively): the 5-year rates of overall survival were 93% and 54% and those of recurrence-free survival were 47% and 16%, respectively. The early HCC group was at a lower risk of recurrence (relative risk, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.65; P=.002) and death (0.26; 0.09-0.73; P=.01) than was the overt HCC group. Early HCC is a distinct clinical entity with a high rate of surgical cure.

Bloodless liver resection using the monopolar floating ball plus ligasure diathermy: preliminary results of 16 liver resections

Blood loss during liver transection and ischemia-reperfusion injury associated with hepatic inflow occlusion are significant drawbacks during liver surgery. Sixteen patients underwent liver resection using the Monopolar Floating Ball (FB) plus LigaSure (LS) diathermy without occlusion of the hepatoduodenal ligament (group FB-LS). The liver parenchyma was precoagulated using the FB, and the uncovered tiny vessels were sealed using LS. Surgical outcomes were retrospectively compared with 16 well matched patients who underwent liver resection using the conventional clamp crushing method with Pringle's maneuver (group CC). The amount of blood loss during liver transection was significantly less in group FB-LS than in group CC [200 ml (0-990 ml) vs. 480 ml (120-1800 ml); p = 0.006]. The median time it took to complete the liver transection was significantly longer in group FB-LS than in group CC [144 minutes (43-335 minutes) vs. 58 minutes (18-94 minutes); p < 0.0001]. Hepatic inflow occlusion was temporally used in five patients in group FB-LS to achieve hemostasis in hepatic venous tributaries for 6, 10, 19, 26, and 61 minutes, respectively. Using these two electronic devices allows liver resection to be safely performed, with the advantage of minimal blood loss and a reduced inflow occlusion period compared to the conventional method. The major disadvantage may be a slower transection speed. A prospective randomized trial is needed to clarify the clinical benefits of liver resections performed using this novel technique.

Increased Biliary Fistulas after Liver Resection with the Harmonic Scalpel

The Harmonic Scalpel (HS) is frequently used for hepatic resection. Yet, no current study addresses its utility compared to conventional methods. We reviewed our experience with this device to determine if it decreased perioperative complications when compared to the traditional clamp crushing technique. One hundred forty-nine anatomic hepatic resections were performed at our institution from September 1992 to February 2002. Patients were divided into two groups based on the technique of resection: HS [53% (n = 79)] versus clamp crushing [47% (n = 70)]. Use of the HS was associated with a shorter mean operative time (357 ± 15.0 vs. 404 ± 19.1 min; p = 0.05) and a trend toward decreased blood loss (1211 ± 125.5 vs. 1411 ± 180.7 mL; P = NS) and transfusion requirements (2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 1.7 ± 0.3 units; P = 0.10). However, use of the HS was associated with a significant increase in biliary fistulas [24% (n = 19) vs. 7% (n = 5); P = 0.01]. Use of the Harmonic Scalpel was associated with decreased operative time and a trend toward decreased blood loss and transfusion requirements. Its use was also associated with a significant increase in the incidence of postoperative bile leaks, and, therefore, surgeons must be vigilant during liver parenchymal transection when using this device.

Extrahepatic disease does not contraindicate hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Extrahepatic disease has always been considered an absolute contraindication to hepatectomy for liver metastases. The present study reports the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of patients undergoing resection of extrahepatic disease simultaneously with hepatectomy for liver metastases.

METHODS

From January 1987 to January 2001, 111 (30 per cent) of 376 patients who had hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases underwent simultaneous resection of extrahepatic disease with curative intent.

RESULTS

Surgery was considered R0 in 77 patients (69 per cent) and palliative (R1 or R2) in 34 patients (31 per cent). The mortality rate was 4 per cent and the morbidity rate 28 per cent. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 38 and 20 per cent respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate of patients with R0 resection only (n = 75) was 29 per cent. The difference in survival between patients with and without extrahepatic disease discovered incidentally at operation was significant, as was the number of liver metastases.

CONCLUSION

Extrahepatic disease in patients with colorectal cancer who also have liver metastases should no longer be considered an absolute contraindication to hepatectomy. However, the presence of more than five liver metastases and the incidental intraoperative discovery of extrahepatic disease remain contraindications to hepatic resection.

Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature

OBJECTIVE

To identify 10 critical elements of accurate and comprehensive reports of surgical complications.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Despite a venerable tradition of weekly morbidity and mortality conferences, inconsistent complication reporting is common in the surgical literature.

METHODS

An analysis of articles reporting short-term outcomes after pancreatectomy, esophagectomy, and hepatectomy was performed. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from 1975 to 2001 and retrospective series of more than 100 patients published from 1990 to 2001 were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 119 articles reporting outcomes in 22,530 patients were analyzed. This included 42 RCTs and 77 retrospective series. Of the 10 criteria developed, no articles met all criteria; 2% met 9 criteria, 38% 7 or 8, 34% 5 or 6, 40% 3 or 4, and 12% 1 or 2. Outpatient information (22% of articles), definitions of complications provided (34% of articles), severity grade used (20% of articles), and risk factors included in analysis (29% of articles) were the most commonly unmet quality reporting criteria. Type of study (RCT vs. retrospective), site of institution (U.S. vs. non-U.S.) and journal (U.S. vs. non-U.S.) did not influence the quality of complication reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term surgical outcomes are routinely included in the data reported in the surgical literature. This is often used to show improvements over time or to assess the impact of therapeutic changes on patient outcome. The inconsistency of reporting and the lack of accepted principles of accrual, display, and analysis of complication data argue strongly for the creation and generalized use of standards for reporting this information.