Effect of Anlotinib as a Third-Line or Further Treatment on Overall Survival of Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The ALTER 0303 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Changing Landscape of Systemic Therapy in Biliary Tract Cancer

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are often diagnosed at advanced stages and have a grave outcome due to limited systemic options. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (GC) has been the first-line standard for more than a decade. Second-line chemotherapy (CT) options are limited. Targeted therapy or TT (fibroblast growth factor 2 inhibitors or FGFR2, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or IDH-1, and neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase or NTRK gene fusions inhibitors) have had reasonable success, but <5% of total BTC patients are eligible for them. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as pembrolizumab is restricted to microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) patients in the first line. The success of the TOPAZ-1 trial (GC plus durvalumab) is promising, with numerous trials underway that might soon bring targeted therapy (pemigatinib and infrigatinib) and ICI combinations (with CT or TT in microsatellite stable cancers) in the first line. Newer targets and newer agents for established targets are being investigated, and this may change the BTC management landscape in the coming years from traditional CT to individualized therapy (TT) or ICI-centered combinations. The latter group may occupy major space in BTC management due to the paucity of targetable mutations and a greater toxicity profile.

Etiology and Management of Dyslipidemia in Patients With Cancer

Patients with cancer are now living longer than ever before due to the growth and expansion of highly effective antineoplastic therapies. Many of these patients face additional health challenges, of which cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading contributor to morbidity and mortality. CVD and cancer share common biological mechanisms and risk factors, including lipid abnormalities. A better understanding of the relationship between lipid metabolism and cancer can reveal strategies for cancer prevention and CVD risk reduction. Several anticancer treatments adversely affect lipid levels, increasing triglycerides and/or LDL-cholesterol. The traditional CVD risk assessment tools do not include cancer-specific parameters and may underestimate the true long-term CVD risk in this patient population. Statins are the mainstay of therapy in both primary and secondary CVD prevention. The role of non-statin therapies, including ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid and icosapent ethyl in the management of lipid disorders in patients with cancer remains largely unknown. A contemporary cancer patient needs a personalized comprehensive cardiovascular assessment, management of lipid abnormalities, and prevention of late CVD to achieve optimal overall outcomes.

[Anti-angiogenesis in Lung Cancer: Current Situation, Progress and Confusion]

Lung cancer is a highly vascular tumors, over the past ten years, anti-angiogenes is has been proved to be an effective and highly promising combinational treatment. The data of the combination of anti-angiogenesis with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy has been constantly updating. Advanced lung cancer patients, no matter different groups or different stages of the disease, are benefited from anti-angiogenes. In this paper, based on the clinical status and unsolved problems, combined with the latest clinical and translational research data, we reviewed the current anti-angiogenesis treatment of lung cancer.
.

FDFT1/FGFR2 rearrangement: A newly identified anlotinib-sensitive FGFR2 variant in cholangiocarcinoma

According to previous reports,10-16% of patients with clinically advanced cholangiocarcinoma develop FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements. Treatment with FGFR2-specific inhibitors (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs) has proven effective for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. In this study, we report a case of advanced cholangiocarcinoma, in which the patient was unable to tolerate the adverse effects of standard first-line chemotherapy. Genetic testing suggested the presence of a novel variant resulting from FDFT1/FGFR2 rearrangement. Owing to poor accessibility and high price, only a limited number of patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma have access to TKIs and precision targeted therapy in China. Anlotinib is a novel small-molecule multi-target TKI developed independently in China. It has a broad target spectrum, including FGFR, and can effectively inhibit tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation, thereby achieving an anti-tumor effect. Here, the patient was prescribed anlotinib. After treatment, the tumor size continued to shrink, and no significant adverse effects were reported. The finding suggested that anlotinib may be effective in patients with FDFT1/FGFR2 rearrangement and could serve as a novel treatment option for affected patients in future.

Association Between Obesity and Poor Prognosis in Patients Receiving Anlotinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Anlotinib is a novel anti-angiogenesis drug. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), high body mass index (BMI) was not associated with worse survival in patients treated with bevacizumab compared with those with normal or low BMI. However, it remains unknown whether such an association still exists in NSCLC patients receiving anlotinib therapy. Hence, we conducted this study to investigate whether BMI is associated with clinical outcomes in patients treated with anlotinib for advanced NSCLC. Methods: Data of 554 patients from the ALTER-0302 and the ALTER-0303 trials were analyzed in this study. The patients were classified into non-obesity (BMI <28 kg/m²) and obesity (BMI ≥28 kg/m²) subgroups. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). OS was defined as the interval between the first drug administration and death. PFS was defined as the time span from the date of initiating the treatment to the first documented progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. ORR included complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Results: There were 354 patients (63.9%) who received anlotinib in this study. Restricted cubic spline model showed a U-shaped relation between BMI and the risk of death in the anlotinib group. In a multivariable Cox regression model, a trend of worse overall survival was observed in obese patients who received anlotinib compared with placebo (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.77-7.06; p = 0.136). The interaction between BMI stratification and treatment was significant for OS (P for interaction = 0.038). Conclusion: Our results revealed a U-shaped relationship between BMI and risk of death in patients receiving anlotinib for advanced NSCLC. More importantly, obesity (BMI ≥28 kg/m²) might be a potential predictor of use of anlotinib in advanced NSCLC.

Sintilimab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy has dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and has been included in first-line treatments. Sintilimab is a domestic anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody in China that has received approvals from the National Medical Products Administration to treat classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and squamous and non-squamous NSCLC. In a prospective clinical study we led, neoadjuvant sintilimab has led to major and complete pathologic responses, which are recommended as surrogate endpoints for neoadjuvant immunotherapy; however, its effect remains inconclusive in pulmonary ground glass nodules. Meanwhile, combination plans seem more likely to be satisfying therapeutic options. Specifically, sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy plans conferred better anti-tumor efficacy and clinical benefits compared to chemotherapy alone, which led to their approval in China and the acceptance of a biological license application in the US. Besides, the combination with other plans, such as docetaxel, cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy, radiation therapy, and anlotinib have also shown promising anti-tumor efficacy, with acceptable toxicities, and are therefore worth further exploration. In addition, several clinical trials on NSCLC at our center are ongoing. In general, sintilimab and its combinatorial plans were effective and well tolerated, but the treatment requires appropriate timing; pathologic responses can be surrogate endpoints for neoadjuvant immunotherapy, while more effective biomarkers are warranted. This study provides an overview of sintilimab-based clinical trials on NSCLC, and may support further investigation of sintilimab in future clinical trials.

Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma, What Else Can We Do?

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been considered the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, intermediate‐stage HCC is highly heterogeneous with a broad population with varying tumour burdens, liver function. This suggests that TACE monotherapy treatment might not be suitable for all patients with intermediate‐stage HCC. The administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has become an important treatment option for improving the prognosis of patients with advanced HCC. Over the years, several trials have been conducted to explore the effects of TACE combined with TKIs for intermediate-stage HCC. However, the clinical efficacy is still controversial, and its potential clinical utility needs to be confirmed. This review will focus on the recent progress of TACE combined TKIs for intermediate-stage HCC.

The Effect of Anlotinib Combined with anti-PD-1 in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer

Background

Protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) signaling pathway has been confirmed to be involved in the proliferation, differentiation and migration of tumor cells. Anlotinib, as a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which can inhibit the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), has been confirmed to have significant therapeutic effects on non-small cell lung cancer, medullary thyroid carcinoma, and soft tissue sarcoma, but the therapeutic effect on gastric cancer (GC) is still unclear.

Methods

Anlotinib was screened out of 880 drugs through Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8) technology. TCGA was used to detect the expression of VEGFR in GC, and Kaplan-Meier Plotter was used to analyze the correlation between the expression of VEGFR and the survival rate of GC patients. The impacts exerted by anlotinib to GC cell proliferating, migrating and invading processes were assessed through wound healing assay, transwell assay, and proliferation assay in vitro. In vivo experiments of GC were performed in C57/B6 mouse model to evaluate the function of anlotinib and PD-1 antibody.

Results

It was found from more than compunds that anlotinib has a significant inhibitory effect on GC cells. In vitro experiments show that anlotinib can significantly inhibit the proliferation, invasion and proliferation of GC cells. The expression level of VEGFR is related to the prognosis and survival of GC. GC patients with low expression of VEGFR have better survival. Anlotinib can inhibit the expression of PD-L1, and achieve better therapeutic effects after combined with PD-1 antibody.

Conclusion

The present study reveals that anlotinib down regulates PD-L1. The combination of anlotinib and PD-1 monoclonal antibody is beneficial to GC therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Gefitinib Plus Anlotinib for Patients with EGFR Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Objective

This study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus anlotinib for patients with EGFR positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a first-line setting.

Methods

A total of 36 patients with previously-untreated EGFR positive advanced NSCLC were included in this study retrospectively. All patients were administered with gefitinib plus anlotinib combination therapy. The efficacy of the patients was evaluated with the change of target lesion using imaging evidence according to RECIST 1.1 criteria and all the patients were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected and documented during the combination administration. Univariate analysis according to the baseline characteristic subgroup was implemented using Log rank test and multivariate analysis was adjusted by Cox regression analysis.

Results

All the 36 patients included in our study were available for efficacy and safety analysis. Best overall response of the patients during gefitinib plus anlotinib administration suggested that partial response was observed in 30 patients, stable disease was noted in five patients, and progressive disease was found in one patient, which yielded an objective response rate (ORR) of 83.3% (95% CI=67.2–93.6%) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 97.2% (95% CI=85.5–99.9%). Prognostic data indicated that the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 36 patients with NSCLC was 15.2 months (95% CI=8.15–22.26). Furthermore, the median overall survival (OS) of the 36 patients was 35.9 months (95% CI=22.77–49.03). Additionally, the most common adverse reactions of the patients with NSCLC were diarrhea (63.9%), fatigue (58.3%), hypertension (50.0%), rash (44.4%), and nausea and vomiting (41.7%). Furthermore, ECOG performance status was associated with PFS of gefitinib plus anlotinib combination therapy in baseline characteristic subgroup analysis.

Conclusion

Gefitinib plus anlotinib regimen demonstrated encouraging efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for patients with previously untreated EGFR positive NSCLC preliminarily. The conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

A Case of Iodine 125 Seeds (I-125) Responding to Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Lung squamous cell cancer (SCC) and accounts for approximately 20%-30% of all lung cancers. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the main treatments for lung SCC patients. A case with lung SCC patient who was treated using iodine 125 seeds (I-125) because the location of the tumor was adjacent to the great vessels. I-125 is an ideal brachytherapy for lung SCC patients with large masses who lost the chance of operation. I-125 is an adjuvant therapy, combined with chemotherapy and molecular targeting therapy might serve to improve the prognosis of lung SCC patients.

A concise review on tyrosine kinase targeted cancer therapy

Abstract:

The tyrosine kinase (TK) family is considered one of the important family members of the kinase family due to its important role in various cellular processes like cell growth, cell differentiation, apoptosis, etc. Mutation, overexpression, and dysfunction of tyrosine kinase receptors lead to the development of malignancy; thus, they are considered as one of the important targets for the development of anti-cancer molecules. The tyrosine kinase family is majorly divided into two classes; receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinase. Both of the classes have an important role in the development of tumour cells. Currently, there are more than 40 FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which are used in the treatment of various types of cancers. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors mainly block the phosphorylation of tyrosine residue of the corresponding kinase substrate and so activation of downstream signalling pathways can be inhibited. The promising results of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in solid tumours provide a revolution in oncology research. In this article, we had summarized the role of some important members of the tyrosine kinase family in the development and progression of tumour cells and the significance of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of various types of cancer.

Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Towards a Precision Medicine

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a neuroendocrine malignant tumor originating from parafollicular C-cells producing calcitonin. Most of cases (75%) are sporadic while the remaining (25%) are hereditary. In these latter cases medullary thyroid carcinoma can be associated (multiple endocrine neoplasia type IIA and IIB) or not (familial medullary thyroid carcinoma), with other endocrine diseases such as pheochromocytoma and/or hyperparathyroidism. RET gene point mutation is the main molecular alteration involved in MTC tumorigenesis, both in sporadic and in hereditary cases. Total thyroidectomy with prophylactic/therapeutic central compartment lymph nodes dissection is the initial treatment of choice. Further treatments are needed according to tumor burden and rate of progression. Surgical treatments and local therapies are advocated in the case of single or few local or distant metastasis and slow rate of progression. Conversely, systemic treatments should be initiated in cases with large metastatic and rapidly progressive disease. In this review, we discuss the details of systemic treatments in advanced and metastatic sporadic MTC, focusing on multikinase inhibitors, both those already used in clinical practice and under investigation, and on emerging treatments such as highly selective RET inhibitors and radionuclide therapy.

Multimodality Treatment of Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma: A Review of Current State of Art

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is an unconventional non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is currently managed under guidelines used for conventional NSCLC and has poor survival. Surgery is the optimal choice for resectable PSC, and the prevalence of mutations in this type of tumor laid the foundation for novel systemic therapies such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy. PSC is resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and the effects of the 2 therapies are controversial. Targeted therapies have been reported to confer survival benefits, and savolitinib, an oral selective MET tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, has been approved in metastatic patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutations. Expression and positive rate of programmed death ligand 1 in PSC are high; our previous research has also revealed a high mutational burden and a T-cell-inflamed microenvironment of PSC. Correspondingly, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown preliminary antitumor effects (overall response rates of 40.5% (15/37) and 31.6% (6/19) in two retrospective studies, respectively) in PSC patients. In summary, patients should receive operations at an early stage and multimodality treatments are needed to maximize the benefits of patients with advanced disease.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Their Variations as a Basis for a Prediction Model in Advanced NSCLC Patients Receiving Anlotinib

Background

A phase III randomized multicenter trial (ALTER0303) reported anlotinib to be significantly beneficial to patient survival. An array of inflammatory biomarkers, such as neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), are associated with the response to treatment in numerous types of cancer. However, we found few studies investigating the predictive value of NLR or PLR in advanced NSCLC treatment with anlotinib. Thus, our objective was to examine the relationship between NLR and PLR and treatment effect, as well as to individuate patient stratification and selection.

Methods

NLR and PLR as well as their variations were calculated in 152 advanced NSCLC patients receiving anlotinib as a third or further-line treatment at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital between July 2018 and December 2020. The best cut-off values of NLR and PLR for predicting the treatment response were selected. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method, while univariable and multivariable Cox regression were used to identify and determine dependent and independent predictors of survival.

Results

, Low disease control rate (DCR) was related with a high pre-NLR (P = 0.007), high pre-PLR (P = 0.004), and elevated post-NLR (P = 0.010). Multivariate analysis determined high pre-PLR (>205.63) and elevated post-NLR to be independently associated with poor PFS or OS. Patients whose risk score was 2 resulting from the prediction model based on pre-PLR and post-NLR had a 4.52 times higher risk of death compared to patients whose risk score was 0 (HR: 4.516, 95% CI: 2.502-8.152, P ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

Pre-PLR and post-NLR were independent prognostic indicators in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving anlotinib as a third or further-line treatment. Patients whose risk value score was 0 had a higher therapy effectiveness and better survival.

The Relationship Between Short-Term Surrogate Endpoint Indicators and mPFS and mOS in Clinical Trials of Malignant Tumors: A Case Study of Approved Molecular Targeted Drugs for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in China

Objective: Due to the initiation of the priority review program in China, many antitumor drugs have been approved for marketing based on phase II clinical trials and short-term surrogate endpoint indicators. This study used approved targeted drugs for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China as an example to evaluate the association between short-term surrogate endpoints [objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR)] and median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). Methods: Five databases, i.e., MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched, for phase II or phase III clinical trials of all molecular targeted drugs that have been marketed in China for the treatment of NSCLC. After screening the literature and extracting information, both univariate and multivariate linear regression were performed on the short-term surrogate indicators and mPFS and mOS to explore the relationship. Results: A total of 63 studies were included (25 studies with only ORR, DCR, and mPFS and 39 studies with ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS). In terms of the targeted drugs for the treatment of NSCLC, in addition to the good but not excellent linear relationship between DCR and mOS (0.4 < R2 adj = 0.5653 < 0.6), all other short-term surrogate endpoint indicators had excellent linear relationships with mPFS and mOS (R2 adj≥0.6), while mPFS and mOS had the most excellent linear relationships (R2 adj = 0.8036). Conclusion: For targeted drugs for the treatment of NSCLC, short-term surrogate endpoint indicators such as ORR and DCR may be reliable surrogate indicators for mPFS and mOS. However, whether short-term surrogate endpoint indicators can be used to predict final endpoints remains to be verified.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Combined With Anlotinib for Multiple Brain Metastases From Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Without Targetable Driver Mutation: A Single-Arm, Phase II Study

Background:

Existing evidence demonstrates that radiotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs have synergistic antitumour effects and may be a promising treatment option for patients with solid tumour. Thus, we performed a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) combined with anlotinib for multiple brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable driver mutations.

Methods:

Patients with multiple BMs (⩾3) from NSCLC without targetable driver mutations who failed to respond to at least first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Eligible patients received WBRT (30 Gy/10 f, 5 f/week) and anlotinib (12 mg/day, day 1-14 of 21 days per cycle, 2 cycles) until disease progression or treatment intolerance. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and secondary endpoints included intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results:

Between April 2019 and March 2021, 21 patients were enrolled in the trial, of which 12 were aged ⩾60 years (57.1%), 13 were men (61.9%), 7 had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0 to 1 (81.0%), 18 had adenocarcinoma (85.7%), and 11 had ⩾6 BMs (52.4%). Of the 21 evaluable patients, the iORR was 66.7% (1 complete response + 13 partial response [PR]), and 28.6% (7PR) had extracerebral lesions. The DCRs for intracerebral and extracerebral lesions were 90.5% and 81.0%, respectively. The iPFS and OS were 10.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0-24.8 months) and 13.4 months (95% CI: 0-27.9 months), respectively. The most frequently observed toxicities were loss of appetite (61.9%), hypertension (52.4%), fatigue (47.6%), diarrhoea (28.6%), vomiting (19.0%), dizziness (42.9%), and headache (33.3%). None of the patients developed grade 4 or higher grade adverse reactions.

Conclusions:

Anlotinib combined with WBRT is effective and well tolerated in patients with multiple BMs (⩾3) from NSCLC without targetable driver mutations. Therefore, further validation studies are required.

Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR 1900027769

Prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index and its variations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib monotherapy

Background

Anlotinib is a third‐line or further therapy for advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the lack of simple biomarkers to predict the curative effect of anlotinib creates significant unmet needs in exploring the markers. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and its variations and efficacy of anlotinib.

Methods

Data for patients with advanced NSCLC who received anlotinib were collected at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital. The data included the values of pretreatment PNI (pre‐PNI), posttreatment PNI (post‐PNI), and ΔPNI (post‐PNI minus the pre‐PNI). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to generate survival curves, whereas univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to analyze survival predictors.

Results

A high disease control rate was associated with a high pre‐PNI (p = 0.007), high post‐PNI (p = 0.000), and high ΔPNI (p = 0.006). Univariable analysis revealed that pre‐PNI ≤41.80, post‐PNI ≤42.48, and ΔPNI ≤0.20 were significant risk factors for poor survival. According to the multivariate analysis, progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with post‐PNI ≤42.48 was significantly shorter than in patients with higher values (median PFS: 1.5 months vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.010).

Conclusions

Pre‐PNI, ΔPNI, and post‐PNI were found to be predictive factors for response in advanced NSCLC patients treated with anlotinib as a third‐line or further treatment. Only post‐PNI was a reliable predictor of PFS. Therefore, PNI and its variations, particularly post‐PNI, are affordable and accessible predictors of NSCLC patients treated with anlotinib in clinical work.

Therapeutic Modalities in Small Cell Lung Cancer: a paradigm shift after decades of quiescence

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is known to be the most aggressive of all thoracic malignancies, notoriously known for its very poor prognosis. Platinum based chemotherapy has been the standard of care for decades. Despite years of research, no treatment novelties with significant impact on survival have been achieved until recently. The last few years have witnessed light at the end of the tunnel with immunotherapy proving to improve survival. Nevertheless, responses were not homogeneous in all subgroups, and finding who would best benefit from treatment remains unanswered. Multiple limitations exist, and the quest for optimal biomarkers seemed unfruitful until the discovery of different SCLC phenotypes.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors briefly discuss SCLC phenotypes and biomarker assays. Then, the authors continue with the main trials of SCLC treatment using chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted treatment in the front-line or subsequent line settings.

EXPERT OPINION

Research has been extensively implemented to better understand the biology of SCLC, and test for the optimal use of immunotherapy in patients with SCLC, as well as to enhance responses via possible combinations. Targeted mechanisms of action have also been attempted; yet no solid proof of efficacy has been established.

Anlotinib Induces a T Cell-Inflamed Tumor Microenvironment by Facilitating Vessel Normalization and Enhances the Efficacy of PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade in Neuroblastoma

PURPOSE

Anlotinib has achieved good results in clinical trials of a variety of cancers. However, the effects of anlotinib on the tumor microenvironment (TME) and systemic immunity have not been reported. There is an urgent need to identify the underlying mechanism to reveal new opportunities for its application in neuroblastoma (NB) and other cancers. Understanding the mechanism will hopefully achieve the goal of using the same method to treat different cancers.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This study used bioinformatics, NB syngeneic mouse models, flow cytometry, RNA-seq, and immunofluorescence staining to explore the mechanisms of anlotinib on the TME, and further explored anlotinib-containing combination treatment strategies.

RESULTS

We proved that anlotinib facilitates tumor vessel normalization at least partially through CD4+ T cells, reprograms the immunosuppressive TME into an immunostimulatory TME, significantly inhibits tumor growth, and effectively prevents systemic immunosuppression. Moreover, the combination of anlotinib with a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor counteracts the immunosuppression caused by the upregulation of PD-L1 after monotherapy, extends the period of vascular normalization, and finally induces NB regression.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this study is the first to dynamically evaluate the effect of a multitarget antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor on the TME. These findings have very important clinical value in guiding the testing of related drugs in NB and other cancers. Based on these findings, we are conducting a phase II clinical study (NCT04842526) on the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, irinotecan, and temozolomide in the treatment of refractory or relapsed NB, and hopefully we will observe patient benefit.

Combination of Anti-PD-1 Antibody, Anlotinib and Pegaspargase “Sandwich” With Radiotherapy in Localized Natural Killer/T Cell Lymphoma

Asparaginase/pegaspargase containing regimens combined with radiotherapy are highly effective and considered the cornerstone of localized Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL) treatment. However, these chemotherapy regimens inevitably cause relatively high incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Herein we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combined regimen of anti-PD-1 antibody, anlotinib and pegaspargase “sandwich” with radiotherapy in localized NKTL. Anti-PD-1 antibody and pegaspargase at 2500 U/m² were administered on day 1, while anlotinib (12 mg once a day) was orally administered on days 1-14. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. All the eight patients included received 3 cycles of the regimen followed by radiotherapy and an additional 3 cycles. The overall response rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 87.5%. With a median follow-up time of 35.5 months (range, 34.03-40.90 months), median PFS and OS times were not reached. The 3-year PFS and OS rates were 100% and 100%, respectively. All patients were alive at the last follow-up. No treatment-related death and no grade 4 TRAE was reported. No grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was detected, and half of the patients didn’t report any hematological toxicity. This study indicates that anti-PD-1 antibody combined with anlotinib and pegaspargase is a promising chemoradiotherapy regimen for localized NTKL, with mild toxicity and good tolerance.

Anlotinib Reverses Multidrug Resistance (MDR) in Osteosarcoma by Inhibiting P-Glycoprotein (PGP1) Function In Vitro and In Vivo

Overexpression of the multidrug resistance (MDR)-related protein P-glycoprotein (PGP1), which actively extrudes chemotherapeutic agents from cells and significantly decreases the efficacy of chemotherapy, is viewed as a major obstacle in osteosarcoma chemotherapy. Anlotinib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has good anti-tumor effects in a variety of solid tumors. However, there are few studies on the mechanism of anlotinib reversing chemotherapy resistance in osteosarcoma. In this study, cellular assays were performed in vitro and in vivo to evaluate the MDR reversal effects of anlotinib on multidrug-resistant osteosarcoma cell lines. Drug efflux and intracellular drug accumulation were measured by flow cytometry. The vanadate-sensitive ATPase activity of PGP1 was measured in the presence of a range of anlotinib concentrations. The protein expression level of ABCB1 was detected by Western blotting and immunofluorescence analysis. Our results showed that anlotinib significantly increased the sensitivity of KHOSR2 and U2OSR2 cells (which overexpress PGP1) to chemotherapeutic agents in vitro and in a KHOSR2 xenograft nude mouse model in vivo. Mechanistically, anlotinib increases the intracellular accumulation of PGP1 substrates by inhibiting the efflux function of PGP1 in multidrug-resistant cell lines. Furthermore, anlotinib stimulated the ATPase activity of PGP1 but affected neither the protein expression level nor the localization of PGP1. In animal studies, anlotinib in combination with doxorubicin (DOX) significantly decreased the tumor growth rate and the tumor size in the KHOSR2 xenograft nude mouse model. Overall, our findings suggest that anlotinib may be useful for circumventing MDR to other conventional antineoplastic drugs.

A Linear Discriminant Analysis Model Based on the Changes of 7 Proteins in Plasma Predicts Response to Anlotinib Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background

Anlotinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor mainly targeting angiogenesis signaling. The predictive marker of anlotinib’s efficacy remains elusive. This study was designed to explore the predictive marker of anlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 52 advanced NSCLC patients who underwent at least one line of targeted therapy or chemotherapy between August 2018 and March 2020. Patients were divided into durable responders (DR) and non-durable responders (NDR) based on the median progression-free survival (PFS, 176 days). The Olink Immuno-Oncology panel (92 proteins) was used to explore the predictive protein biomarkers in plasma samples before treatment (baseline) and on the first treatment evaluation (paired).

Results

At baseline, the response to anlotinib was not significantly associated with age, gender, smoke history, histology, oligo-metastases, EGFR mutations, and other clinical characteristics. The results of PFS-related protein biomarkers at baseline were all not satisfying. Then we assessed the changes of 92 proteins levels in plasma on the first treatment evaluation. We obtained a Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model based on 7 proteins, with an accuracy of 100% in the original data and an accuracy of 89.2% in cross validation. The 7 proteins were CD70, MIC-A/B, LAG3, CAIX, PDCD1, MMP12, and PD-L2. Multivariate Cox analysis further showed that the changes of CD70 (HR 25.48; 95% CI, 4.90–132.41, P=0.000) and MIC-A/B (HR 15.04; 95% CI, 3.81–59.36, P=0.000) in plasma were the most significant prognostic factors for PFS.

Conclusion

We reported herein a LDA model based on the changes of 7 proteins levels in plasma before and after treatment, which could predict anlotinib responders among advanced NSCLC patients with an accuracy of 100%. Further studies are warranted to verify the prediction performance of the LDA model.

[A Case Report of AFP-producing Primary Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Significant Therapeutic Effect]

BACKGROUND

Primary lung squamous carcinoma that produces alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is rare and only four related cases have been reported so far. The specific reasons for elevated serum level of AFP and effective treatment regimens for AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma are not clear. This paper reports the diagnosis and treatment of AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma so as to provide some references for similar cases in clinical practice.

METHODS

The diagnosis and treatment of an AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma patient admitted to the Shandong Cancer Hospital on October 23, 2020 was retrospectively analyzed, and literatures were reviewed.

RESULTS

A 52-year-old male patient was diagnosed as T4N3M0 stage, IIIc right upper lobe lung squamous cell carcinoma with mediastinal lymph node metastasis and multiple metastases in the lung. The main tumor marker was abnormally increased serum AFP. After the rapid progression of two lines chemotherapy, the patient was given anlotinib combined with carrizumab as third-line treatment. The efficacy evaluation reached to partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) after 2 and 4 cycles of treatment, respectively. The treatment regimen was replaced with albumin paclitaxel plus carrizumab due to gastrointestinal bleeding after the fifth cycle. The patient's condition was under continuous control.

CONCLUSIONS

The AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma patient had a good response to anlotinib and immunotherapy in the case report, which may provide some guidances for the clinical practice and the research on AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects

Non-small cell lung cancer is one of the most common types of malignances worldwide and the main cause of cancer-related deaths. Current treatment for NSCLC is based on surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy, with poor therapeutic effectiveness. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have applied in NSCLC treatment. A large number of experimental studies have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors are safer and more effective than traditional therapeutic modalities and have allowed for the development of better guidance in the clinical treatment of advanced NSCLC patients. In this review, we describe clinical trials using ICI immunotherapies for NSCLC treatment, the available data on clinical efficacy, and the emerging evidence regarding biomarkers.

First-Line Anlotinib Combined with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for an Octogenarian with Pulmonary Carcinosarcoma

Pulmonary carcinosarcoma (PC) is a rare and highly malignant type of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is insensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy and has a poor prognosis. Here, we report a case of an 88-year-old patient with inoperable PC and a history of cerebral infarction who was treated with first-line anlotinib combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The therapeutic response has sustained for 10 months. Our work suggests that SBRT combined with anlotinib may be a safe and effective treatment strategy for octogenarians with PC.

Clinical outcomes and safety of osimertinib plus anlotinib for patients with previously treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC: A retrospective study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Although osimertinib achieved convincing efficacy for patients with EGFR T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as second-line treatment in the AURA3 clinical trials, patients developed drug resistance ultimately. Therefore, the present study was to investigate the clinical outcome and safety of osimertinib plus anlotinib for patients with previously treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

Designed as a retrospective study, this study consecutively included a total of 33 patients with advanced NSCLC who possessed a EGFR T790M-positive mutation and progressed after the first-line therapy. Eligible patients were treated with osimertinib plus anlotinib. Baseline characteristics of the patients were collected during hospitalization. Efficacy of the combination regimen was assessed with the change of target lesion using imaging evidence according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, and all the patients were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected and documented during the treatment. Univariate analysis according to baseline characteristic subgroups was performed using log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was carried out by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The best overall response of the patients during osimertinib and anlotinib combination indicated that complete response was found in one patient, partial response was observed in 26 patients, stable disease was noted in 5 patients and progressive disease was reported in one patient. Therefore, objective response rate (ORR) of the combination regimen was 81.8% (95%CI: 64.5%-93.0%), and disease control rate (DCR) was 97.0% (95%CI: 84.2%-99.9%). Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 33 patients with NSCLC was 15.5 months (95%CI: 6.19-24.81). In addition, the median overall survival (OS) of the 33 patients with NSCLC was 23.8 months (95% CI: 17.67-29.93). Safety profile suggested that the most common adverse reactions of the patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib plus osimertinib were hypertension (63.6%), fatigue (57.6%), diarrhoea (48.5%%), dermal toxicity (39.4%) and proteinuria (33.3%). Interestingly, multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS demonstrated that ECOG performance status was an independent factor to predict the PFS of the combination regimen.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Osimertinib plus anlotinib regimen preliminarily exhibited encouraging clinical outcomes and acceptable safety profile for patients with previously treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC numerically. This conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials.

Anlotinib Alone or in Combination With Temozolomide in the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: Anlotinib is a multi-target anti-angiogenic agent. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib alone or in combination with temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma.

Materials and Methods: The clinical data of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma treated with anlotinib alone or in combination with temozolomide in our cancer center were collected and analyzed. Treatment response was evaluated according to the response assessment for neuro-oncology criteria. Progression-free survival, progression-free survival at 6 months, overall survival, and overall survival at 12 months were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank test.

Results: Between August 2019 and December 2020, 31 patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (21 of grade 4 and 10 of grade 3) were enrolled in this study. Seventeen patients received anlotinib alone and 14 received anlotinib plus temozolomide. All patients were heavily treated, the median lines of previous treatments were 2, and the median Karnofsky score was 60. At the data cutoff date, the median progression-free survival was 4.5 months and the progression-free survival at 6 months was 43.5%. The median overall survival was 7.7 months, and the overall survival at 12 months was 26.7%. The progression-free survival at 6 months and the overall survival at 12 months for 21 patients with grade 4 glioma was 40.2 and 27.9%, respectively. The tumor objective response rate was 41.9% in all patients and 33.3% in patients with grade 4 glioma. No grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were recorded during the treatment.

Conclusion: Anlotinib alone or in combination with temozolomide showed encouraging efficacy and favorable tolerability in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma who had been heavily treated.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Effect of Anlotinib in Patients With Lung Cancer With or Without Previous Antiangiogenic Therapy

Objective

The purpose of this study was to initially investigate the effect of previous antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab and endostatin) on the efficacy of anlotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic lung cancer (LC).

Methods

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with LC treated with anlotinib and divided them into group A (treated with anlotinib after the failure of previous antiangiogenic drugs and group B (no prior use of antiangiogenic drugs). We used propensity score matching (PSM) for confounding factors between the groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also recorded.

Results

A total of 160 patients were included in the analysis. The median OS in groups A and group B was 11.8 months and 16.1 months (P=0.120), whereas the median PFS was 3.1 months and 4.7 months (P=0.009), respectively. Moreover, the objective response rate (ORR) of the two groups was 9.6% and 10.4% (P=0.874), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.1% and 80.5% (P=0.165).

After PSM (n=46), baseline characteristics were comparable between groups A and B. Furthermore, the median OS of the two groups was 14.6 months and 16.2 months (P=0.320), whereas the median PFS was 3.5 months and 4.5 months (P=0.040), respectively. Moreover, the ORR of the two groups were 13.0% and 10.9% (P=0.748), and the DCR were 78.3% and 82.6% (P=0.599), respectively.

Conclusions

Previous antiangiogenic treatments may affect the PFS of patients who receive anlotinib later, but it might not affect the patient’s ORR and OS.

Anlotinib combined with temozolomide suppresses glioblastoma growth via mediation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway

Purpose

Anlotinib protects against carcinogenesis through the induction of autophagy and apoptosis. The current study evaluated the role and molecular mechanisms of anlotinib in glioblastoma, and the effects of anlotinib in combination with temozolomide (TMZ).

Methods

Cell Counting Kit-8 and colony-forming assays were used to evaluate cell viability. Cell migration and invasion were assessed by wound-healing, Transwell migration, and Matrigel invasion assays. Cellular apoptosis and cell cycle analysis were determined by flow cytometry. Angiogenesis was assessed using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Protein expression was determined by western blotting or immunofluorescence staining. The in vivo anti-glioblastoma effect was assessed with live imaging of tumor xenografts in nude mice.

Results

Anlotinib restricted the proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioblastoma cells in a dose-dependent manner. Tumor supernatant from glioblastoma cells treated with anlotinib inhibited angiogenesis in HUVECs. Anlotinib induced autophagy in glioblastoma cells by increasing Beclin-1 and microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3B (LC3B) levels. Mechanistically, anlotinib inhibited the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)/VEGFA signaling pathway. STAT3 inhibition by S3I-201 decreased VEGFA and suppressed cellular proliferation and movement. TMZ enhanced the anti-glioblastoma ability of anlotinib. Finally, anlotinib inhibited tumor growth and JAK2/STAT3/VEGFA signaling in xenografts.

Conclusion

Anlotinib exerts anti-glioblastoma activity possibly through the JAK2/STAT3/VEGFA signaling pathway. TMZ potentiated the anti-glioblastoma effect of anlotinib via the same signaling pathway, indicating the potential application of anlotinib as a treatment option for glioblastoma.

Anlotinib inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion, and induces apoptosis of breast cancer cells by downregulating TFAP2C

The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) network contributes to breast cancer pathogenesis and progression. Anlotinib is a highly potent multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been previously shown to exert antitumor effects in various types of cancer. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of Anlotinib against breast cancer cells in vitro and uncover the possible underlying mechanisms. The human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 was treated with different concentrations of Anlotinib, before cell proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis were assessed using colony formation, wound healing, Transwell and TUNEL staining assays. In addition, the expression of transcription factor AP-2γ (TFAP2C) following Anlotinib stimulation was measured using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and western blot analysis. TFAP2C was overexpressed in MCF-7 using transfection with a pcDNA3.1 vector, before the aforementioned experiments were repeated. The results revealed that Anlotinib impaired cell viability and colony formation, reduced proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Ki-67, MMP2, MMP9 and Bcl-2 expression levels, and inhibited cell migration and invasion. By contrast, the expression levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, the frequency of apoptotic cells, the expression of Bax and the cleaved caspase-3/caspase-3 ratio increased in a concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, the expression of TFAP2C decreased after Anlotinib treatment. However, TFAP2C overexpression partially blocked the effects of Anlotinib on the proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis of MCF-7 cells. To conclude, Anlotinib suppressed proliferation, migration and invasion, whilst inducing apoptosis of MCF-7 cells, which may be partially dependent on the inhibition of TFAP2C expression.

Partial Response After Toripalimab Plus Anlotinib for Advanced Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: A Case Report

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer, accounting for <1%. The clinical outcome is unknown due to the lack of treatment options. Here, we present the case of a 58-year-old woman with advanced MBC, in which standard adjuvant chemotherapy was unsuccessful. In the second-line therapy, she received anti-angiogenic(anlotinib) therapy plus chemotherapy. Finally, she was subsequently treated with immunotherapy (toripalimab) combined anlotinib and achieved partial response (PR); thus, immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenic therapy might be a novel option for advanced MBC patients.

A single-arm, prospective study of apatinib mesylate plus pemetrexed in patients of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer after failure of previous chemotherapy

Background

The outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after first- or second-line therapy are still discouraging due to a lack of effective treatment strategies. As a novel oral anti-angiogenesis drug, apatinib, approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China only for advanced gastric cancer, has been increasingly used in off-label treatment across various cancer types in recent years, especially advanced NSCLC. It has shown strong anti-tumor efficacy and acceptable safety.

Methods

This prospective study (NCT02974933) was conducted in patients with advanced NSCLC, who had suffered disease progression from the first- or second-line treatment, in Hubei Cancer Hospital. Eligible patients were enrolled and administrated with apatinib mesylate (500 mg qd) in combination with pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

From September 2016 to September 2019, a total of 21 advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled in Hubei Cancer Hospital. As of January 2021, treatment was discontinued in all patients, with 1 still in follow-up. There were 7/21 (33.3%) patients who achieved objective response. The median PFS and median overall survival (OS) were 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.15-7.85 months) and 13.0 months (95% CI: 7.39-18.6 months), respectively. Toxicities were tolerable or could be clinically managed. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (14.3%, 3/21), hand-foot syndrome (4.7%, 1/21), and proteinuria (4.7%, 1/21). Hematological toxicities were moderate, with rare occurrences of grade 3/4 toxicities. During the period of treatment, there was no occurrence of treatment-related death.

Conclusions

Apatinib plus pemetrexed demonstrated promising efficacy and a high level of safety profile in previously heavily-treated NSCLC patients. More definitive studies on the combination of apatinib and pemetrexed are warranted.

Implication of Polymorphism on the Prognosis of Anlotinib Monotherapy for Patients With Treatment-Refractory Advanced NSCLC: An Exploratory Study

Background: This study aimed to investigate the implication of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) polymorphism on the prognosis of anlotinib monotherapy among patients with treatment-refractory advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Designed as a retrospective study, this study included a total of 129 patients with treatment-refractory advanced NSCLC who were administered with anlotinib monotherapy. The efficacy of the patients was assessed regularly. The prognosis was performed and adverse reactions during anlotinib administration were collected. Available and appropriate biological specimens of the 129 patients were collected to perform VEGFR2 polymorphism analysis and VEGFR2 gene mRNA expression analysis accordingly. Association analysis between genotype status of VEGFR2 polymorphism and other variables was implemented in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Efficacy data indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the 129 patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib monotherapy was 9.3% (95% CI: 4.9%-15.7%) and 78.3% (95%CI: 70.2%-85.1%), respectively. Additionally, prognostic data suggested that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the 129 patients with NSCLC were 4.1 months (95%CI: 2.84-5.36) and 10.1 months (95%CI: 8.58-11.62), respectively. Furthermore, polymorphism analysis indicated that polymorphism of 4397T>C in VEGFR2 was of clinical significance in the exploratory analysis, which exhibited that the median PFS of patients with TC/CC and TT genotype of 4397T>C polymorphism were 2.8 and 5.0 months, respectively (P = .009). Additionally, patients with TT genotype conferred a superior OS compared with those with TC/CC genotype (median OS: 11.5 vs 7.3 months, P = .016). Interestingly, mRNA expression of the VEGFR2 gene suggested that mRNA expression of VEGFR2 in PBMC specimens of patients with TC/CC genotype was significantly higher than that of patients with TT genotype (P < .001). Conclusion: Anlotinib monotherapy exhibited potential efficacy for patients with treatment-refractory advanced NSCLC. VEGFR2 polymorphism 4397T>C might be used as a promising biomarker to predict the survival of patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib administration.

Clinical analysis of anlotinib as first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma without driver gene mutations

This retrospective study was conducted to explore the effects of anlotinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 60 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, admitted to the Fuzhou Pulmonary Hospital between August 2018 and December 2019. We calculated and recorded the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse reactions, quality of life assessment, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for each group. We applied χ2, Mann-Whitney U test, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank statistical methods as appropriate to analyze the data. We found no statistically significant differences in either ORR (17.5 vs. 15%) or DCR (67.5 vs. 65.5%) between the anlotinib and pemetrexed groups (P > 0.05). The adverse reactions graded ≥3 in the anlotinib group were fatigue and diarrhea and they accounted for 5% of all the adverse reactions in the group. The patients in the anlotinib group presented better physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social functions than those in the pemetrexed group (P < 0.05). The symptoms of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite and constipation in the anlotinib group were significantly less frequent than those in the pemetrexed group (P < 0.05). We found similar median PFSs (3.0 vs. 2.8 months) and median OSs (7.0 vs. 7.0 months) in both treatment groups (P > 0.05). The choice of anlotinib as first-line chemotherapy for treating elderly patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma was effective, safe; the treatment was better than other drugs at improving the patients' quality of life.

Anlotinib for patients with small cell lung cancer and baseline liver metastases: A post hoc analysis of the ALTER 1202 trial

Liver metastasis is common in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). There is no evidence-proven treatment beyond the second line in patients with SCLC and liver metastasis. This study aimed to investigate survival in patients with SCLC and liver metastasis treated with anlotinib compared with placebo. This study was a post hoc analysis of the phase II ALTER 1202 trial, including patients who had liver metastasis at baseline. The participants were randomized 2:1 to receive either 12 mg/day anlotinib (anlotinib group) or placebo (placebo group). Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. In the original trial, there were 39 participants with liver metastasis at baseline, including 27 and 12 in the anlotinib and placebo groups, respectively. The objective response rate was 3.7% and 0% in the anlotinib and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.9999). An elevated disease control rate was found in the anlotinib group (44.4%) compared with the placebo group (8.3%, p = 0.0173). The median PFS was 1.51 vs. 0.71 months in favor of anlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.365, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.78; p = 0.0064), with no marked difference in median OS (3.29 vs. 1.91 months; HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.22-1.16; p = 0.0996). The most common AEs in the anlotinib group were hypertension (40.7%), fatigue (29.6%), loss of appetite (22.2%), and weight loss (22.2%). There were no grade 5 AE. In conclusion, anlotinib increased PFS compared with placebo in patients with SCLC and liver metastasis.

Anlotinib Suppresses Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Growth and Metastasis by Targeting the RAS Protein to Inhibit the PI3K/Akt Signalling Pathway

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a malignant tumour originating from the mucosal lining of the oral cavity. Its characteristics include hidden onset, high recurrence, and distant metastasis after operation. At present, clinical treatment usually includes surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or the joint use of these modalities. Unfortunately, multidrug resistant is one of the important obstacles that causes cancer chemotherapy failure. Anlotinib, which has recently been proven to have good antitumour effects, is a novel multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, there are few studies of the anlotinib-associated mechanism in OSCC and its underlying molecular mechanism. In our study, in vitro models of human oral squamous cell carcinoma HSC-3 cells were used to determine the efficacy of anlotinib. On the one hand, we showed that anlotinib treatment significantly reduced the viability and proliferation of HSC-3 cells and decreased cell migration by inhibiting the activation of the Akt phosphorylation pathway. On the other side, anlotinib inhibited PI3K/Akt/Bad phosphorylation and promoted apoptosis of HSC-3 cells by activating RAS protein expression. In brief, these results indicated that anlotinib had prominent antitumour activity in OSCC, mainly by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt phosphorylation pathway. This work provides evidences and a basic principle for using anlotinib to treat patients with OSCC for clinical research.

The treatment of advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a pathological subtype of non-small cell lung cancer. Although the incidence of PSC in lung cancer is very low, it is an aggressive cancer, leading to a poor prognosis. Currently, there is no standard treatment for advanced PSC. Targeted therapy can be used for patients with MET exon 14 mutations and patients with other driver gene mutations may also benefit from treatment. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors also provides potential options for advanced PSC treatment, but more clinical data is needed. Additionally, more research may be warranted to explore the effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. In this review, the authors summarize the research regarding the treatment of advanced PSC.

A Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluates Clinical Value of Anlotinib in Persistent, Metastatic, or Recurrent Cervical Cancer After Failure of First-Line Therapy

Background

Anlotinib is an oral anti-angiogenesis inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs), platelet-derived growth factor receptors, fibroblast growth factor receptors, etc., and its clinical value in cervical cancer is rarely reported. We designed a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with persistent, metastatic, or recurrent cervical cancer who have failed first-line therapy, and compare the efficacy of anlotinib with that of apatinib which targets only VEGFR2 and has shown efficacy in recent studies.

Methods

Fifty-two patients with persistent, metastatic, or recurrent cervical cancer who failed first-line therapy and administrated anlotinib or apatinib as monotherapy or combination with chemo-, radio- or immunotherapy were included in this study. Among the 52 patients, 20 patients who received anlotinib from January 2019 to August 2020 were defined as anlotinib group, whereas 32 patients who received apatinib from our previous study were selected as apatinib group. The safety, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were reviewed and recorded.

Results

The ORR and DCR in patients receiving anlotinib were 25% and 80%, respectively. The median PFS and OS in anlotinib group were significantly longer than those in apatinib group, respectively (PFS: 5 months vs 3 months, p=0.015; OS: 10 months vs 5 months, p=0.008). Moreover, the patients treated with anlotinib had better survival with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of cancer-related death than those treated with apatinib (HR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.13–0.77, p=0.012). The most common adverse effects in the patients treated with anlotinib were hypertension (20%), fatigue (20%), and nausea (15%). No drug-related death occurred.

Conclusion

Anlotinib showed beneficial efficacy and safety and can be a treatment option for patients with persistent, metastatic, or recurrent cervical cancer who have failed the first-line therapy.

Targeted therapy with anlotinib for a H3K27M mutation diffuse midline glioma patient with PDGFR-α mutation: a case report

H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma (H3K27M-mt DMG) was a novel entity, which was defined by K27M mutations in H3F3A or HIST1H3B/C in the 2016 WHO updated fourth edition of the central nervous system (CNS) tumor classification. There is an urgent need for effective therapeutic strategies. Anlotinib is a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which has not been reported for H3K27M-mt DMG treatment. Here, we firstly reported an adult multifocal H3K27M-mt DMG patient benefiting from anlotinib. This report provides a promising treatment option for H3K27M-mt DMG patients.

Levels of pretreatment blood lipids are prognostic factors in advanced NSCLC patients treated with anlotinib

Background

Anlotinib, a small molecule for multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibition, is the third or further line of defense for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Findings from an ALTER0303 phase III trial revealed that this drug confers significant survival benefits in patients. Although numerous inflammatory biomarkers have been shown to play vital roles in treatment, the clinical significance of blood lipid levels before treatment has not been evaluated. Here, this research aims to explore the relationship between blood lipids and efficacy of anlotinib, with a view of generating insights to guide future development of convenient and individualized treatment therapies.

Methods

This study analyzed basal blood lipids levels, including triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein (LDL), and high density lipoprotein (HDL), among other variables before treatment, in 137 patients with advanced NSCLC who received anlotinib as third or further-line treatment at the Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, between July 2018 and December 2020. We determined the best cut off value for predicting treatment responses, generated survival curves using the Kaplan–Meier method, then applied univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to assess predictors of survival.

Results

The entire study population recorded median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 4 (95% CI 3.142–4.858) and 8.3 (95% CI 6.843–9.757) months, respectively. Researchers observed statistically significant differences across subgroups, between blood lipid indexes with different efficacies, except in the HDL subgroup. The low disease control rate (DCR) was associated with significantly elevated TG, TC and LDL levels (P = 0.000). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that elevated TC and LDL levels were independently associated with poor PFS or OS (P ≤ 0.003). Then, we established a prediction model, and set high TC or high LDL as the risk factor, respectively. There were significant differences in PFS (p = 0.000) and OS (p = 0.012) between 0 and ≥ 1 scores.

Conclusions

Prior to anlotinib therapy, TC and LDL levels, are independent prognostic indicators for patients with advanced NSCLC treated with this drug as a third or further-line treatment option. In addition, a risk score of 0 was attributed to a combination of low TC and low LDL, and these patients were exhibited excellent efficacies and survival rates.

Afatinib combined with anlotinib in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma patient with novel HER2 mutation: a case report and review of the literature

Background

HER2 is a member of the ERBB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, and HER2 mutations occur in 1–4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as an oncogenic driver mutation. We found a rare mutation of HER2 p.Asp769Tyr in NSCLC.

Case presentation

We presented a case of a 68-year-old nonsmoking male patient with brain metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma harboring a rare mutation of HER2 p.Asp769Tyr. After multiple lines of treatment, he obtained a durable response (10 months) to afatinib and anlotinib.

Conclusion

We reported for the first time that afatinib and anlotinib have successfully treated lung adenocarcinoma with HER2 p.Asp769Tyr mutation. This finding can provide an insight into the optimal treatment of lung adenocarcinoma patients with novel mutations. Additionally, we summarized the efficacy of targeted therapy for HER2 mutant lung cancer in this article.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02444-7.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Anlotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization plus anlotinib oral administration in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Consecutive data from 51 patients with advanced NSCLC were retrospectively collected from February 2018 to August 2019. All patients underwent drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) followed by anlotinib treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, and factors associated with OS and PFS were assessed by a Cox proportional hazards test. Treatment response at 30 days was assessed by enhanced computed tomography (CT), and then the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also evaluated.

Results: The median OS was 18.4 months (95% CI, 16.6–20.2 months), and the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.2–10.6 months). The ORR and DCR for the whole cohort were 21.6 and 100%, respectively, at 30 days after the first cycle of treatment. Most of the treatment-related adverse reactions were mild and moderate and included anorexia, hypertension, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome. Only eight (15.7%) patients developed grade 3 TRAEs. No deaths or other serious adverse reactions occurred. Both TNM stage and brain metastasis were independent risk factors for OS and PFS.

Conclusion: DEB-BACE concomitant with anlotinib has promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Prognostic factors of patients with advanced lung cancer treated with anlotinib: a retrospective cohort study

Objective

Our study aimed to evaluate the main factors affecting the efficacy of anlotinib to determine the therapeutically dominant populations.

Methods

The medical records of patients with lung cancer who were treated with anlotinib from July 2018 to February 2020 at Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University were retrospectively reviewed. The optimal cutoff prognostic nutritional index (PNI) value for predicting efficacy was determined according to receiver operating characteristic curves. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank test. The prognostic values of each variable were evaluated with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.

Results

The overall disease control rate of 44 patients with lung cancer was 93.2% (41/44). The median PFS was 5.0 months (95% [confidence interval] CI: 2.2–7.8), and the median OS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 3.6–9.3). The multivariate analysis results indicated that hand–foot syndrome and high PNI values were independent protective factors of PFS and OS.

Conclusions

Anlotinib was effective in treating locally advanced or advanced lung cancer. High pretreatment PNI scores and the presence of hand–foot syndrome after treatment were independent prognostic markers for favorable OS and PFS.

The number of brain metastases predicts the survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation status

Background

Lung cancer is the common cause of cancer‐related deaths throughout the world, and brain is a frequent metastatic site of lung cancer.

Aim

This research sought to evaluate the impact of the number of brain metastases in prognosticating non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients accounting to the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

Methods and Results

NSCLC patients with brain metastases diagnosed/treated in West China Hospital, Sichuan University between 2009 and 2017 were identified retrospectively. Kaplan–Meier approach was adopted to estimate OS. And we performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses of characteristics related to overall survival (OS) in both EGFR‐mutated and wild‐type cohorts. In total, this study included 611 eligible NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Extracranial metastases and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of OS in both cohorts. As the disease progressed, EGFR‐mutated patients had brain metastasis significantly earlier (P < .0001), but they also had notably better survival outcomes than wild‐type patients (P < .0001). And the number of brain metastases impacted the survival incidence in the progression significantly in both EGFR‐mutated and wild‐type groups (P = .0087/.037, respectively).

Conclusion

The number of brain metastases was a prognostic factor for lung cancer patients either with EGFR mutations or with wild‐type EGFR, with larger number indicating more unfavorble clinical outcomes. Patients with EGFR mutations had a better survival.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Monotherapy as Third-Line Therapy for Elderly Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Purpose

The present study was to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy as third-line therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 83 elderly patients (>65 years) with NSCLC who were progressed at least two lines of previous systemic therapy were recruited retrospectively. Patients were treated with anlotinib monotherapy (12 mg or 10 mg). Efficacy of anlotinib was assessed and all the patients were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected during anlotinib administration. Univariate analysis was performed using Log rank test and multivariate analysis was adjusted by Cox regression analysis. Additionally, prognostic analysis according to common adverse reactions was implemented to identify the potential clinical significance.

Results

The best overall response of the 83 elderly patients during anlotinib monotherapy indicated that partial response (PR) was observed in six patients, stable disease (SD) was noted in 59 patients, and progressive disease (PD) was reported in 18 patients. Consequently, the objective response rate (ORR) was 7.2% (95% CI=2.7–15.1%) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 78.3% (95% CI=67.9–86.6%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 83 elderly patients with NSCLC was 4.2 months (95% CI=3.51–4.89). Furthermore, the median overall survival (OS) of the 83 patients was 9.6 months (95% CI=6.65–12.55). The safety profile suggested that the relatively common adverse reactions of the elderly patients with ES-SCLC receiving anlotinib therapy were hypertension (49.4%), fatigue (45.8%), and hand–foot syndrome (39.8%). Interestingly, association analysis exhibited that the median PFS of patients with hypertension and non-hypertension was 4.5 and 3.0 months, respectively (χ²=6.306, P=0.012).

Conclusion

Anlotinib monotherapy demonstrated a satisfactory efficacy and tolerable safety profile in third-line settings for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients who experienced a hypertension adverse reaction induced by anlotinib therapy might confer superior PFS. The conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

Microbiome Crosstalk in Immunotherapy and Antiangiogenesis Therapy

The human body and its microbiome constitute a highly delicate system. The gut microbiome participates in the absorption of the host's nutrients and metabolism, maintains the microcirculation, and modulates the immune response. Increasing evidence shows that gut microbiome dysbiosis in the body not only affects the occurrence and development of tumors but also tumor prognosis and treatment. Microbiome have been implicated in tumor control in patients undergoing anti- angiogenesis therapy and immunotherapy. In cases with unsatisfactory responses to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy, appropriate adjustment of microbes abundance is considered to enhance the treatment response. Here, we review the current research progress in cancer immunotherapy and anti- angiogenesis therapy, as well as the unlimited potential of their combination, especially focusing on how the interaction between intestinal microbiota and the immune system affects cancer pathogenesis and treatment. In addition, we discuss the effects of microbiota on anti-cancer immune response and anti- angiogenesis therapy, and the potential value of these interactions in promoting further research in this field.

Real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib as third- or further-line treatment in refractory small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

As a novel antiangiogenic multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor recently approved in China, anlotinib has exhibited promising anticancer efficacy and acceptable safety profile in the salvage treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in clinical trials. Here we retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as third- or further-line treatment in patients with refractory SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 40 patients with refractory SCLC treated with anlotinib monotherapy were included in this study. The clinicopathological data, treatment information, survival data and safety data were retrospectively collected. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed by log-rank testing.

RESULTS

Altogether, 40 patients of extensive-stage SCLC or progressive limited-stage SCLC received anlotinib monotherapy as third- or further-line treatment from July 2018 to June 2020. Four patients achieved partial response (PR), 14 patients achieved stable disease (SD), no complete response (CR) was recorded, and 22 patients experienced progressive disease (PD). The disease control rate (DCR) was 45.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.241-3.759), and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.8 months (95% CI 3.190-12.410). The common adverse effects (AEs) included hypertension, fatigue, anorexia, cough, rash and nausea. Grade 3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 3 (7.5%) patients. One patient interrupted anlotinib treatment due to repeated grade 1 epistaxis. Univariate analysis revealed that patients without liver metastases, previously treated with radiotherapy or with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0 or 1 had longer OS with anlotinib treatment. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that patients without liver metastases and patients with ECOG score ≤ 1 had longer PFS, while patients without liver metastases had longer OS.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib is beneficial to refractory SCLC as third- or further-line treatment, especially in patients without liver metastasis and with better physical status. Related adverse effects are tolerable and manageable.

Effect of prior thoracic radiotherapy on prognosis in relapsed small cell lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib: a subgroup analysis of the ALTER 1202 trial

Background

In ALTER 1202, anlotinib prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of this study was to explore the effect of front-line thoracic radiotherapy (RT) on the benefits of anlotinib as a third-line-or-beyond treatment.

Methods

This was a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (ALTER 1202). The participants were divided into RT (previous thoracic RT) and non-RT subgroups. The outcomes included PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results

In the ALTER 1202 trial, 68 participants (anlotinib, n=46; placebo, n=22) received RT and 51 participants (anlotinib, n=35; placebo, n=16) did not. PFS was longer for anlotinib versus placebo in both the RT (5.49 vs. 0.69 months; P<0.001) and non-RT (2.83 vs. 0.76 months; P<0.001) subgroups. In the RT subgroup, the OS was longer for anlotinib vs. placebo (9.49 vs. 4.90 months; P=0.039). No differences were found in the ORR, but the DCR was higher in the anlotinib arm of the RT subgroup compared with the placebo arm (73.9% vs. 9.1%, P<0.001) and the non-RT subgroup (68.6% vs. 18.8%; P=0.002).

Conclusions

In relapsed SCLC patients with previous thoracic RT, anlotinib might have DCR, PFS, and OS benefits compared with placebo. In those without previous thoracic RT patients, anlotinib might have DCR and PFS benefits compared with placebo. The safety was similar between anlotinib and placebo groups.