Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin vs Sorafenib Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective Response Predicts Survival in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma treated with Systemic Therapies

PURPOSE

Due to the increased number of sequential treatments used for advanced HCC, there is a need for surrogate endpoints of overall survival (OS). We analyze if objective response (OR) is an independent predictor and surrogate endpoint of OS.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in advanced HCC published between 2010 and 2020 was conducted to explore OS surrogacy of OR by RECIST and mRECIST. In parallel, RCTs exploring the impact of OR on OS in a time-dependent multivariate analysis were integrated in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Out of 65 RCTs identified in advanced HCC, we analyzed 34 studies including 14,056 patients that reported OS and OR by either RECIST (n=23), mRECIST (n=5) or both (n=6). When exploring surrogacy, the trial-level correlation between OR odds ratio and OS hazard ratio was R=0.677 by mRECIST and R=0.532 by RECIST. Meta-analysis of five RCT assessing predictors of survival in multivariate analysis found that patients with OR by mRECIST presented a pooled HR for OS of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.27-0.70, p<0.001) compared with non-responders. Responses to atezolizumab-bevacizumab had a greater impact on OS than tyrosine-kinase inhibitor responses.

CONCLUSIONS

OR-mRECIST is an independent predictor of OS in patients with advanced HCC. Although correlation of OR-mRECIST and OS is better than with OR-RECIST, the level of surrogacy is modest. Thus, it can be used as endpoint in proof-of-concept phase II trials, but the data does not support its use as a primary endpoint of phase III investigations assessing systemic therapies.

Multi-task deep learning network to predict future macrovascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Models predicting future macrovascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma are constructed to assist timely interventions.

METHODS

A total of 366 HCC cases were retrospectively collected from five Chinese hospitals between April 2007 and November 2016: the training dataset comprised 281 patients from four hospitals; the external validation dataset comprised 85 patients from another hospital. Multi-task deep learning network-based models were constructed to predict future macrovascular invasion. The discrimination, calibration, and decision curves were compared to identify the best model. We compared the time to macrovascular invasion and overall survival using the best model and related image heterogeneity scores (H-score). Then, we determined the need for a segmentation subnet or the replacement deep learning algorithm by logistic regression in screening clinical/radiological factors. Finally, an applet was constructed for future application.

FINDINGS

The best model combined clinical/radiological factors and radiomic features. It achieved best discrimination (areas under the curve: 0·877 in the training dataset and 0·836 in the validation dataset), calibration, and decision curve. Its performance was not affected by the treatments and disease stages. The subgroups had statistical significance for time to macrovascular invasion (training: hazard ratio [HR] = 0·073, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·032-0·167, p < 0·001 and validation: HR = 0·090, 95%CI: 0·022-0·366, p < 0·001) and overall survival (training: HR = 0·344, 95%CI: 0·246-0·547, p < 0·001 and validation: HR = 0·489, 95%CI: 0·279 - 0·859, p = 0·003). Similar results were achieved when the patients were subdivided by the H-score. The subnet for segmentation and end-to-end deep learning algorithms improved the performance of the model.

INTERPRETATION

Our multi-task deep learning network-based model successfully predicted future macrovascular invasion. In high-risk populations, besides the current first-line treatments, more therapies may be explored for macrovascular invasion.

Revisiting Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a well-established and common treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in East Asia. However, HAIC is not recognized internationally. Although several trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of HAIC, evidence corroborating its overall survival (OS) benefits compared with standard treatments is insufficient. Nevertheless, HAIC may provide prominent benefits in selected patients such as patients with portal vein thrombosis or high intrahepatic tumor burden. Moreover, HAIC has been combined with several therapeutic agents and modalities, including interferon-alpha, multikinase inhibitors, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy, to augment its treatment efficacy. Most of these combinations appeared to increase overall response rates compared with HAIC alone, but results regarding OS are inconclusive. Two prospective randomized controlled trials comparing HAIC plus sorafenib with sorafenib alone have reported conflicting results, necessitating further research. As immunotherapy-based combinations became the mainstream treatments for advanced HCC, HAIC plus immunotherapy-based treatments also showed encouraging preliminary results. The trials of HAIC were heterogeneous in terms of patient selection, chemotherapy regimens and doses, HAIC combination agent selections, and HAIC technical protocols. These heterogeneities may contribute to differences in treatment efficacy, thus increasing the difficulty of interpreting trial results. We propose that future trials of HAIC standardize these key factors to reveal the clinical value of HAIC-based treatments for HCC.

Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with FOLFOX-Based Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Large or Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX)-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (D-TACE-HAIC) for unresectable large (5.1-10 cm) or huge (>10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with unresectable large or huge HCC who underwent D-TACE-HAIC (D-TACE-HAIC group) or DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group) from January 2017 to December 2020. At imaging, tumor infiltrating appearance was classified into smooth tumor margin, non-smooth tumor margin, and macrovascular invasion. Adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients (mean age, 53 years ± 12; 117 men) were included: 69 underwent D-TACE-HAIC and 64 underwent DEB-TACE. The patients who underwent D-TACE-HAIC had higher ORR (71.0% vs 53.1%; P = 0.033), longer PFS (median, 9.3 vs 6.3 months; P = 0.005), and better OS (median, 19.0 vs 14.0 months; P = 0.008) than those who underwent DEB-TACE. In subgroup analysis, patients with non-smooth tumor margin (median, 20.8 vs 13.0 months; P = 0.031) or macrovascular invasion (median, 15.0 vs 11.0 months; P = 0.015) had significantly longer OS in D-TACE-HAIC group than in DEB-TACE group; but in patients with smooth tumor margin, OS between the two groups was similar (median, 37.0 vs 35.0 months; P = 0.458). DEB-TACE, non-smooth tumor margin, and macrovascular invasion were independent prognostic factors for poor OS in uni- and multivariable analyses. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events was not statistically different between the two groups (37.7% vs 28.1%; P = 0.242).

CONCLUSION

D-TACE-HAIC was tolerable and led to better OS than DEB-TACE in patients with large or huge HCC, especially in those with non-smooth tumor margin or macrovascular invasion.

Downstaging Conversion Therapy in Patients With Initially Unresectable Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Overview

The high mortality rate associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is partly due to the high proportion of patients who present with advanced stage disease at diagnosis, for whom there are limited treatment options. For selected patients with initially unresectable HCC, locoregional and/or systemic treatments can result in tumor downstaging and consequently provide opportunities for surgical intervention and the potential for long-term survival. Therefore, the key aim of 'conversion therapy' is to reduce tumor burden so that patients become amenable to surgical resection. Various therapies have been investigated as candidates for downstaging patients with potentially resectable HCC including transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres, radiotherapy, systemic therapies and combination or multimodality treatment approaches. However, downstaging conversion therapy remains controversial and there are several challenges such as defining the criteria used to identify the population of patients who are 'potentially resectable', the criteria used to define successful downstaging, and the optimum treatment approach to maximize the success of downstaging therapy. In this review article, we summarize clinical experience and evidence of downstaging conversion treatment in patients identified as having 'potentially resectable' HCC.

Construction of a single nucleotide variant score-related gene-based prognostic model in hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of multi-independent databases and validation in vitro

BACKGROUND

The accumulation of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and the emergence of neoantigens can affect tumour proliferation and the immune microenvironment. However, the SNV-related immune microenvironment characteristics and key genes involved in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still unclear. We aimed to evaluate differences in the SNV-related immune microenvironment, construct a prognostic model and validate the key genes in vitro.

METHODS

The categories of samples were defined by the expression of SNV score-related genes to evaluate the differences in mutational features, immune environment and prognosis. The survival model was constructed with survival-associated genes and verified in two independent test datasets. RCAN2, the key gene screened out for biofunction, was validated in vitro.

RESULTS

IC2, among the three integrated clusters (IC1, IC2, IC3) classified by the 82 SNV score-related genes, was distinct from the rest in SNV score and immune cell infiltration, showing a better prognosis. Seven prognostic markers, HTRA3, GGT5, RCAN2, LGALS3, CXCL1, CLEC3B, and CTHRC1, were screened to construct a prognostic model. The survival model distinguished high-risk patients with poor prognoses in three independent datasets (log-rank P < 0.0001, 0.011, and 0.0068, respectively) with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. RCAN2 was inversely correlated with NK cell infiltration, and knockdown of RCAN2 promoted proliferation in HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the characteristics of the HCC SNV-associated subgroup and screened seven latent markers for their accuracy of prognosis. Additionally, RCAN2 was preliminarily proven to influence proliferation in HCC and it had a close relationship with NK cell infiltration in vitro. With the capability to predict HCC outcomes, the model constructed with seven key differentially expressed genes offers new insights into individual therapy.

Transarterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFOX for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center propensity score matched analysis of real-world practice

Background

To compare the treatment effectiveness and safety among transarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) with FOLFOX regimen, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and sorafenib in patients with BCLC stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

The data of consecutive patients with BCLC stage C HCC treated with TAI, TACE, or sorafenib from January 2015 to December 2018 at three centers were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was pairwise performed to reduce selection bias. Treatment effectiveness and safety were evaluated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox regression models, and χ² test.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) in the matched TAI cohort was significantly longer than the sorafenib cohort (19.6 vs. 7.5 months, P=0.009), and the TACE cohort (estimated 27.8 vs. 6.6 months, P<0.001). The difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) between the matched TAI and sorafenib cohorts was not significant (5.8 vs. 2.3 months, P=0.219). The median PFS in the matched TAI cohort was significantly longer than the TACE cohort (6.5 vs. 2.8 months, P<0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) in the matched TAI cohort was significantly higher than the sorafenib cohort (36.4% vs. 0.0%, P<0.001) and the TACE cohort (48.7% vs. 4.7%, P<0.001). The incidences of adverse events (AEs) were similar among these three cohorts.

Conclusions

TAI with FOLFOX regimen was an effective and safe therapy that improved survival of patients with BCLC stage C HCC.

Surgical Conversion for Initially Unresectable Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Triple Combination of Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Anti-PD-1 Antibodies, and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Recent research has shown that selected patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are able to achieve conversion to resectable disease through systemic or local therapy. Combination regimens comprised of drugs with different mechanisms of action have shown better outcomes than single-drug or single-approach-based treatments; however, to date, combination regimens investigated as part of conversion therapy strategies have been two drug combinations with reported issues of relatively low surgical conversion and objective response rates. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with angiogenesis inhibitors, programmed death-1 inhibitors and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for surgical conversion of advanced HCC.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, single-arm study of patients with unresectable HCC who received at least one cycle of triple combination therapy with an oral anti-angiogenic drug, programmed death-1 inhibitors and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy between August 2019 and August 2020. Endpoints included the overall response rate (ORR), surgical conversion rate, time to response and safety. Treatment response was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

In total, 34 patients were included in this study, of whom 25 completed treatment evaluation. The best ORR was 96.0% (24/25); 48.0% (n = 12) had a complete response, 48.0% (n = 12) had a partial response, and 4.0% (n = 1) had stable disease. The median time to response was 50.5 (95% CI, 31.02-64.00) days and the surgical conversion rate was 60% (15/25). Of the 25 patients, 56.0% (n = 14) received surgical resection and 28.0% (n = 7) had a pathologic complete response. Toxic side effects were manageable.

CONCLUSION

A triple combination therapy regimen of angiogenesis inhibitors, programmed death-1 inhibitors and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy showed significant therapeutic effect with an extremely high surgical conversion rate in patients with initially unresectable HCC.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Modified FOLFOX as an Alternative Treatment Option in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Failed or Unsuitability for Transarterial Chemoembolization

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with modified FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) as an alternative treatment option in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with failed or unsuitability for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2018 to January 2020, 87 advanced HCC patients who progressed on TACE or were not eligible for TACE received HAIC treatment with modified FOLFOX. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, and adverse events graded according to CTCAE 5.0. Based on prognostic factors determined by multivariate analysis, a nomogram was developed to predict patient survival.

RESULTS

The median OS and PFS were 9.0 months (95%CI 7.6-10.4) and 3.7 months (95%CI 3.1-4.3), respectively. The objective response rate was 13.8%, with a disease control rate of 48.3%. Grade 3 adverse events were observed, such as infection (9.2%), thrombocytopenia (5.7%), hyperbilirubinemia (3.4%), abdominal pain (2.3%) and alanine aminotransferase increase (2.3%). Albumin, AST, and extrahepatic metastasis were incorporated to construct a new nomogram that could stratify patients into three prognostic subgroups, including low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with significant differences in 9-month OS rates (71%, 42% and 6%, respectively; p< 0.001). The nomogram was better than the Okuda, AJCC, and CLIP staging systems for OS prediction.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the feasibility of HAIC with modified FOLFOX as an alternative treatment strategy for advanced HCC when TACE is ineffective or unsuitable.

Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer

Objective

To analyze the radiation dose received by patients during hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedures and the related influencing factors.

Methods

Data of 162 cases in the HAIC group and 230 cases in the TACE group were collected. The included covariates were Age (<45/45–59/≥60 years), BMI levels (underweight/normal weight/obesity), focus Dye of tumor (present/absent), lesion size (<5cm/≥5cm), superselection (present/absent), hepatic vascular variation (present/absent). The endpoints were postoperative dose-area product (DAP), exposure time and Air kerma (AK).

Results

Of all included patients, the HAIC group patients were younger than those in the TACE group (P ​= ​0.028). The proportion of patients with large lesions in the HAIC group was higher than the TACE group (45.7% vs. 33.9%, P ​= ​0.019). The proportion of patients who had superselection was lower in the HAIC group as compared to the TACE group (61.7% vs. 82.2%, P ​< ​0.001). Generally, the HAIC group has lower DAP, exposure time and AK by 36.3% (P ​< ​0.001), 38.2% (P ​< ​0.001), and 41.3% (P ​< ​0.001) than the TACE group, respectively. Linear regression analysis showed the procedure method (HAIC/TACE, P ​< ​0.001), type of DSA machine (Pheno/FD20, P ​< ​0.001), BMI levels (P ​< ​0.001), age (P ​= ​0.021), lesion size (<5cm/≥5 ​cm, P ​= ​0.031) significantly correlated with low DAP. In the HAIC group, the type of DSA machine and BMI correlated with the radiation dose, while in the TACE group, the type of DSA machine, BMI, and lesion size correlated with the radiation dose.

Conclusion

Compared with TACE, HAIC enables doctors and patients to receive lower radiation doses. Obese patients in both HAIC and TACE groups increase the radiation exposure in interventional doctors and patients, but large lesions only affect the radiation dose in the TACE procedure.

Changing the Treatment Paradigm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Combination Therapy

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy was approved worldwide for use in 2020. A 30% objective response rate with 8% complete response (CR) was achieved in a phase 3 IMbrave150 trial. Here, the change in the treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy is reviewed. The phase 3 IMbrave150 clinical trial was successful because of the direct antitumor effect of bevacizumab, which shifted the suppressive immune microenvironment to a responsive immune microenvironment, in addition to its synergistic effects when combined with atezolizumab. The analysis of CR cases was effective in patients with poor conditions, particularly tumor invasion in the main portal trunk (Vp4), making the combination therapy a breakthrough for HCC treatment. The response rate of the combination therapy was 44% against intermediate-stage HCC. Such a strong tumor-reduction effect paves the way for curative conversion (ABC conversion) therapy and, therefore, treatment strategies for intermediate-stage HCC may undergo a significant shift in the future. As these treatment strategies are effective in maintaining liver function, even in elderly patients, the transition frequency to second-line treatments could also be improved. These strategies may be effective against nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma and WNT/β-catenin mutations to a certain degree.

Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer worldwide, and the fastest increasing cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Its propensity for vascular invasion leads to the presence of portal vein tumor thrombus in up to half of patients. PVTT results in a classification of advanced disease, given the risk recurrence secondary to intravascular spread, and formal guidelines recommend systemic therapy in these patients. However, recent advances in locoregional therapies including TACE, TARE, and ablation have demonstrated the potential to drastically improve overall survival in patients with HCC complicated by PVTT.

Feasibility and safety of a novel indwelling catheter system via the femoral artery for intermittent transarterial therapy for treating malignant liver tumors

PURPOSE

An indwelling arterial access system via the brachial artery, System-i, has been previously reported. We have modified the technique for the femoral artery approach. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the modified System-i for patients with malignant liver tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The modified System-i is an indwelling catheter that provides vascular access for inserting a microcatheter without repeated punctures to the femoral artery. Between 2018 and 2020, the system was implanted for 50 patients with malignant liver tumors. We used the system for patients with difficulty in inserting the conventional indwelling catheter system. To place the system, a side-holed catheter was implanted in the femoral artery, and the tip of the catheter was placed in the superficial femoral artery through the contralateral iliac artery. Using this system, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was performed. A shaped high-flow microcatheter and a non-tapered microcatheter were used with the system. The technical aspects and outcomes of the system were also assessed.

RESULTS

Implantation of the system was successful in all patients. The median implantation time was 40 min. The main reason for implantation was obstruction or stenosis of the hepatic artery. Among the 50 patients, 11 (22%) showed complications, of which four had major complications/class C based on the SIR criteria.

CONCLUSION

The modified System-i is a safe system that can be a feasible repeated interventional radiological treatment via the femoral approach. We need to evaluate the efficacy of this system in the treatment of advanced cancers in the future. The modified System-i is a novel indwelling catheter system that allows vascular access to perform intermittent transarterial therapy, such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy via the femoral approach. In this study, we report the technical details and safety of the system.

Lenvatinib Combined with Anti-PD-1 Antibodies Plus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background

Lenvatinib (LEN) combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies (PD-1) exerted promising effects on unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We assessed the safety and clinical efficacy of triple therapy [LEN+PD-1+transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE)] in uHCC.

Methods

uHCC patients with an ECOG PS score of 0–1 and Child–Pugh class A who underwent triple therapy were included. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) based on mRECIST. Secondary endpoints were conversion rate to liver resection and treatment-related adverse events.

Results

Between November 2018 and December 2020, 62 uHCC patients who underwent triple therapy at four major cancer centers in China were analyzed, including 35 in BCLC-C, 21 in BCLC-B, and 6 in BCLC-A. With a median follow-up of 12.2 months (range, 7.6–33.3 months), the investigator and blinded independent central review-assessed ORR were 80.6% and 77.4%, respectively. A total of 33 patients (53.2%) reached the standard of conversion to resectable HCC and 29 patients underwent resection. The median interval between start of triple therapy and resection was 123 days (range, 55–372 days). Pathological complete response and major pathological response were observed in 16 and 24 patients, respectively. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were not reached. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 74.2% of the patients (grade ≥3, 14.5%; grade ≥4, 4.8%).

Conclusion

Combination of LEN, PD-1 and TACE showed a high rate of tumor response and convert resection in uHCC patients, with manageable toxicity.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Cisplatin versus Sorafenib for Intrahepatic Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Simple Summary

Thus far, clinical studies have shown that immunotherapy (atezolizumab-bevacizumab) has shown better and favorable overall survival than sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the treatment outcomes of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with cisplatin compared with sorafenib for intrahepatic advanced HCC remain unclear. We therefore aimed to determine the prognostic factors for HAIC with cisplatin. Our results showed that HAIC with cisplatin could significantly prolong the overall survival for intrahepatic advanced HCC and had a longer prognostic effect than sorafenib. Therefore, our results suggest that HAIC should be used in intrahepatic advanced HCC.

Abstract

Given that the outcome of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with cisplatin for intrahepatic advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear, we aimed to compare prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) following HAIC with cisplatin versus sorafenib for intrahepatic advanced HCC using propensity score-matched analysis. We enrolled 331 patients with intrahepatic advanced HCC who received HAIC with cisplatin (n = 88) or sorafenib (n = 243) between June 2006 and March 2020. No significant difference was observed in OS between HAIC with cisplatin and sorafenib cohorts (median survival time [MST]: 14.0 vs. 12.3 months; p = 0.0721). To reduce confounding effects, 166 patients were selected using propensity score-matched analysis (n = 83 for each treatment). HAIC with cisplatin significantly prolonged OS compared with sorafenib (MST: 15.6 vs. 11.0 months; p = 0.0157). Following stratification according to the Child-Pugh classification, for patients with class A (MST: 24.0 vs. 15.0 months; p = 0.0145), HAIC with cisplatin rather than sorafenib significantly prolonged OS. Our findings suggest that HAIC with cisplatin demonstrates longer prognostic effects than sorafenib in intrahepatic advanced HCC.

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib with or without hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in selected populations of patients with treatment-naive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma exhibiting PD-L1 staining: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

Not all patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular-targeted agents. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) versus pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in selected populations of patients with treatment-naive uHCC exhibiting programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) staining.

Methods

Consecutive patients with treatment-naive uHCC exhibiting PD-L1 staining who were treated with pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib plus HAIC (PLH) or pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (PL) were retrospectively identified from our medical centres from 2018 to 2021. HAIC involved oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX). Follow-up occurred every 3 weeks for 1 year and then every 6 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were the frequency of key adverse events (AEs).

Results

In total, 248 treatment-naive patients were retrospectively reviewed, 78 of whom were ineligible on the basis of the current criteria. Thus, 170 patients (PLH: n = 84, median age 52 years [range, 42–67]; PL: n = 86, 53 years [range, 43–69]) were eligible for the analysis. The median follow-up was 18.6 months (range, 1–26). At the final follow-up, the median OS was 17.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.2–18.3) in the PLH group versus 12.6 months (95% CI, 11.1–13.7) in the PL group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36–0.75; p = 0.001). A significant difference was also detected in the median PFS (10.9 months [95% CI, 8.7–11.4] for PLH vs. 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.2–7.4) for PL; HR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.43–0.85; p = 0.001). Significant differences in the rate of the key AEs were noted between groups (79.8% for PLH vs. 62.8% for PL, p = 0.015), but these AEs were controllable.

Conclusions

Among selected populations of patients with treatment-naive uHCC exhibiting PD-L1 staining, the PLH regimen may substantially improve the survival benefits compared with the PL regimen with a controllable safety profile.

The past, present and future of conversion therapy for liver cancer

Primary liver cancer is one of the world's most common malignant tumors, as well as the malignant tumor with the third highest mortality rate in China. Most Chinese patients with liver cancer already have intermediate or advanced stage disease at initial diagnosis and have lost the opportunity for surgery. Following recent advances in treatments for advanced liver cancer, the associated treatment efficacy and response rates have continuously improved. As a result, the application of preoperative treatments can lead to tumor downstaging in a high proportion of patients and consequently provide initially ineligible patients with opportunities for surgical intervention, representing a breakthrough treatment strategy for liver cancer. Since conversion study is still in its infancy, there remain controversies in terms of patient selection, choice of treatment method, and postoperative management. In this review, we collect and summarize current evidence and clinical experience of conversion therapy, highlight remaining problems and challenges and provide a foundation for further research and development of HCC treatment in clinical practice.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

In a previous phase II trial, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) yielded higher treatment responses than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare the overall survival of patients treated with FOLFOX-HAIC versus TACE as first-line treatment in this population.

METHODS

In this randomized, multicenter, open-label trial, adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (largest diameter ≥ 7 cm) without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread were randomly assigned 1:1 to FOLFOX-HAIC (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m² on day 1, and fluorouracil infusion 2,400 mg/m² for 24 hours, once every 3 weeks) or TACE (epirubicin 50 mg, lobaplatin 50 mg, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles). The primary end point was overall survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of study treatment.

RESULTS

Between October 1, 2016, and November 23, 2018, 315 patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX-HAIC (n = 159) or TACE (n = 156). The median overall survival in the FOLFOX-HAIC group was 23.1 months (95% CI, 18.5 to 27.7) versus 16.1 months (95% CI, 14.3 to 17.9) in the TACE group (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.75; P < .001). The FOLFOX-HAIC group showed a higher response rate than the TACE group (73 [46%] v 28 [18%]; P < .001) and a longer median progression-free survival (9.6 [95% CI, 7.4 to 11.9] v 5.4 months [95% CI, 3.8 to 7.0], P < .001). The incidence of serious adverse events was higher in the TACE group than in the FOLFOX-HAIC group (30% v 19%, P = .03). Two deaths in the FOLFOX-HAIC group and two in the TACE group were deemed to be treatment-related.

CONCLUSION

FOLFOX-HAIC significantly improved overall survival over TACE in patients with unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Comparison Between Portal Vein Perfusion Chemotherapy and Neoadjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Resectable Intermediate to Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with intermediate to advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] stage B/C) have few choices of curable treatments and thus suffer from dismal outcomes. Although surgical resection could prolong survival in certain selected patients with BCLC stage B/C HCC, the frequent postoperative recurrence and poor survival of these patients need to be improved by combining other therapies perioperatively.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to investigate the survival associations of adjuvant portal vein perfusion chemotherapy (PVC) and neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with resectable BCLC stage B/C HCC.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in consecutive patients who underwent R0 resection for intermediate to advanced stage HCC, combined with either PVC or HAIC perioperatively between January 2017 and December 2018. Patients treated with PVC or HAIC were analyzed according to intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) principles, respectively. The chemotherapy regimen of adjuvant PVC and neoadjuvant HAIC included 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin. Survival analysis and Cox regression for overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were used to compare the outcomes.

RESULTS

Among all 64 patients enrolled in this study, 28 received perioperative PVC and 36 received HAIC for ITT analysis. Age (median 44.00 vs. 46.50 years; p = 0.364), sex (male: 25/28 vs. 35/36; p = 0.435), and tumor size (median 9.55 vs. 8.10 cm; p = 0.178) were comparable between the two groups. In the ITT analysis, the median OS was significantly longer in patients in the HAIC group compared with the PVC group (median OS not reached vs. 19.47 months; p = 0.004); in the PP analysis, patients who received neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy presented with much better EFS than patients in the PVC group (modified EFS 16.90 vs. 3.17 months; p = 0.022); and in the multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant HAIC presented as a significant predictor for enhanced EFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.296; p = 0.007) and OS (HR 0.095; p = 0.007) for BCLC stage B/C HCC patients who received hepatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with adjuvant PVC, neoadjuvant HAIC treatment was associated with better survival and fewer recurrences in HCC patients who received R0 resection at the intermediate to advanced stage. These results need to be further validated prospectively.

Real-world study of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Aim: We investigated the efficacy and safety of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Method: This retrospective study included HCC patients treated with HAIC, TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies between May 2019 and November 2020 in our hospital. Primary end points were progression-free survival and safety. Results: Twenty-seven advanced HCC patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 12.9 months (range: 4.0-24.0 months) and the median progression-free survival was 10.6 months. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 63.0 and 92.6%, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: In patients with advanced HCC, treatment with HAIC, anti-PD-1 antibodies and oral TKIs was effective and safe.

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is the standard treatment for patients with advanced HCC with improvement in survival and radiologic progression of the disease. Recently, few studies have advocated the Sorafenib + HAIC combination therapy results in better overall survival and progression-free survival than Sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced HCC. Herein, we aim to identify the best possible treatment option among the above two lines of therapy for patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

The fixed effects and a random-effects model were used to perform a meta-analysis for overall response rate overall survival, and adverse events. Subgroup analysis of the data of univariate analysis in each included trial was performed to identify the specific patient population who could be benefitted from the combination therapy.

RESULTS

Four RCTs containing 609 patients were included in the final analysis. The overall response rate (OR: 3.81; 95% CI 1.01 to 14.42; P = 0.05) and overall survival (HR: 0.70; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.24; P > 0.05) were comparable. Subgroup analysis of OS showed that patients with Child-Pugh score B (HR: 0.30; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.72; P < 0.05) and AFP <400 ng/ml (HR: 0.72; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.99; P < 0.05) were associated with significantly improved survival in the Sorafenib + HAIC group. Bone marrow suppression (OR: 3.76; 95% CI 2.58 to 5.48; P < 0.001) was significantly higher in the Sorafenib + HAIC group, but hepatic function impairment, constitutional symptoms, gastrointestinal events, and dermatological events were comparable (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Child-Pugh score B and AFP <400 ng/ml may be benefited most from Sorafenib + HAIC combination therapy.

Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma - The Changing Tides

Portal vein involvement is considered one of the most fearful complications of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is associated with aggressive tumor biology (high grade), high tumor burden (number and size of lesions), high levels of serum markers (AFP), poor liver function (deranged LFT), and poor performance status of patients. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system places HCC patients with PVTT in advanced stage (BCLC Stage-C). This group contains a fairly heterogeneous patient population, previously considered candidates for palliative systemic therapy with sorafenib. However, this provided modest overall survival (OS) benefit. The results of a recent Phase III (IMbrave150) trial favor the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab over sorafenib as a standard of care in advanced unresectable HCC. While only lenvatinib proved to be non-inferior against sorafenib in a phase III (REFLECT trial), regorafenib (RESORCE trial), ramucirumab (REACH-2), and cabozantinib (CELESTIAL) have been approved second-line therapy in phase III clinical trials. Recently, the data on the prospect of other modalities in the management of HCC with PVTT is mounting with favorable results. Targeting multiple pathways in the HCC cascade using a combination of drugs and other modalities such as RT, TACE, TARE, and HAIC appear effective for systemic and loco-regional control. The quest for the ideal combination therapy and the sequence set is still widely unanswered and prospective trials are lacking. With the armament of available therapeutic options and the advances and refinements in the delivery system, down-staging patients to make them eligible for curative resection has been reported. In a rapidly evolving treatment landscape, performing surgery when appropriate, in the form of LR and even LT to achieve cure does not seem farfetched. Likewise, adjuvant therapy and prompt management of the recurrences holds the key to prolong OS and DFS. This review discusses the management options of HCC patients with PVTT.

The Role of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this study was to investigate comprehensively the clinical effect of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) on patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched for eligible articles published from inception to July 2020: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The main final indicators were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies entailing 4,506 cases were included for a meta-analysis. The results showed that HAIC could improve advanced HCC patients' OS (HR, 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37-0.61) and PFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI: 0.36-0.68). Remarkably, compared with Japan (HR, 0.58) and Korea (HR, 0.54), for the unresectable HCC patients, the HAIC group achieved higher efficacy on OS than the control group in China (HR, 0.24). The resectable HCC patients, who received HAIC adjuvant chemotherapy, exhibited favorable prognosis for OS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI: 0.27-0.88) and DFS (HR, 0.49; 95% CI: 0.31-0.68).

CONCLUSION

HAIC improved long-term survival for both resectable and unresectable HCC patients in comparison with other therapies. However, the clinical effect of HAIC needs to be ascertained by large-scale well-designed studies.

Comparative Analysis of Lenvatinib and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Center, Propensity Score Study

The comparative efficacy and safety between lenvatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still unclear. This multicenter historical cohort study enrolled 244 patients who were treated with HAIC (n = 173) or lenvatinib (n = 71) between 2012 and 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and 52 patients were selected per group. Clinical outcomes and safety were compared. Objective response rate (ORR) was not different between the two groups (26.0% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.736). Before PSM, the HAIC group had a higher proportion of Child-Pugh B and portal vein tumor, whereas the lenvatinib group had more patients with extrahepatic metastases, which was adjusted after PSM. There were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after PSM (HAIC vs. lenvatinib, median PFS, 3.6 vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.706; median OS 10.8 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.106). Multivariate Cox-regression showed that alpha-fetoprotein ≤1000 ng/mL was only an associated factor for OS after PSM in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.421, p = 0.011). Subgroup analysis for patients with a high tumor burden beyond the REFLECT eligibility criteria revealed that the HAIC group (n = 29) had a significantly longer OS than did the lenvatinib group (n = 30) (10.0 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.004). More patients in the HAIC group achieved better liver function than those in the lenvatinib group at the time of best responses. There was no difference in the incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events between the two groups. Therefore, lenvatinib is comparable to HAIC in terms of ORR and OS in unresectable HCC meeting REFLECT eligibility criteria.

Clinical Importance of Regimens in Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Macrovascular Invasion

Simple Summary

Although various molecular targeted agents have been approved, the therapeutic outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macrovascular invasion (MVI) are still unsatisfactory. Locoregional treatment using hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is a promising treatment for MVI-HCC. In the study, we aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of low-dose cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (LFP), a conventional HAIC regimen, and New FP (a fine-powder cisplatin suspended with lipiodol plus 5-fluorouracil) for MVI-HCC with preserved liver function. New FP was significantly superior to LFP in all therapeutic outcomes. New FP is a recommended HAIC regimen for the treatment of patients with MVI-HCC.

Abstract

Macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) is a poor prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a promising treatment in MVI-HCC. However, it is not clear which regimens are suitable for HAIC. In this study, we aimed to compare the therapeutic effects between New FP (a fine-powder cisplatin suspended with lipiodol plus 5-fluorouracil) and low dose FP (LFP/cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) in the treatment of MVI-HCC patients with Child–Pugh class A. New FP is a regimen that consists of a fine-powder cisplatin suspended with lipiodol and 5-fluorouracil. Fifty-one patients were treated with LFP, and 99 patients were New FP. We compared the therapeutic effects of LFP and New FP and assessed factors that associated with the therapeutic effects. The median survival and progression-free survival times of LFP and New FP were 16.1/24.7 and 5.4/8.8 months, respectively (p < 0.05, p < 0.05). The complete response (29%) and objective response rate (76%) of New FP were significantly higher than those of LFP (p < 0.001, p < 0.01). Factors associated with better therapeutic response were better ALBI-grade and New FP treatment choice. New FP is a more powerful regimen than LFP in HAIC for MVI-HCC. New FP represents a recommended HAIC regimen for the treatment of patients with MVI-HCC.

Evidence-Based Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002-2020)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with a rapidly changing landscape of treatments. In the past 20 years, numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have aimed at improving outcomes across disease stages. We aimed to analyze the current evidence and identify potential factors influencing response to therapies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of phase III RCTs (2002-2020) across disease stages. A meta-analysis was designed to examine the relationship between etiology and outcome after systemic therapies with either tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI)/antiangiogenic or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.

RESULTS

Out of 10,100 studies identified, 76 were phase III RCTs. Among them, a rigorous screening algorithm identified 49 with high quality including a total of 22,113 patients undergoing adjuvant (n = 7) and primary treatment for early (n = 2), intermediate (n = 7), and advanced (first-line, n = 21; second-line, n = 12) stages of disease. Nine of these trials were positive, 6 treatments have been adopted in guidelines (sorafenib [2 RCTs], lenvatinib, atezolizumab+bevacizumab, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab), but 2 were not (adjuvant CIK cells and sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion with FOLFOX). Meta-analysis of 8 trials including 3739 patients revealed ICI therapy to be significantly more effective in patients with viral hepatitis compared with nonviral-related HCC, whereas no differences related to etiology were observed in patients treated with TKI/anti-vascular endothelial growth factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Among 49 high-quality RCTs conducted in HCC during 2002-2020, 9 resulted in positive results. A meta-analysis of systemic therapies suggests that immunotherapies may be more effective in viral etiologies.

Overall Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib: A Polish Experience

Background

The mortality caused by hepatocellular carcinoma is expected to rise in the upcoming decade. Sorafenib has become the preferred systemic treatment option in patients with unresectable HCC. This study aimed to present the median overall survival (OS) in a group of patients with advanced HCC, treated with sorafenib in Poland between 2011 and 2019.

Material/Methods

The analyzed group of patients was qualified for treatment with sorafenib, financed by the National Health Fund, based on the guidelines of the Polish Drug Program.

Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the OS curves, and the log-rank test was used for testing. Multivariate assessment of factors (sex and age) related to the time to death of the patient was done using Cox regression.

Results

Of the 2072 treated patients, 75% were men (1556) and 25% were women (516). The minimum age of patients in the trial group was 18 years and the maximum age was 90 years.

Among the 1556 analyzed cases in males, 27.44% (427) did not end with death (by the date of completing the analysis). The percentage of one-year survival for this population was 58.16%, and the 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 34.45%, 21.81%, and 9.72%, respectively.

The percentage of censored cases in the 516 females was 25.78% (133). The 1-2-, 3-, and 5-year survival for this population was 59.30%, 36.27%, 22.47%, and 11.34%, respectively. Statistical tests did not reveal a significant difference in the curve profiles by sex. There were no associations between OS and age.

Conclusions

Systemic treatment with sorafenib in accordance with the presented criteria allows for very good results, comparable to the results of selected groups of patients presented by other authors.

The Impact of Sorafenib in Combination with Intermittent Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Vascular Invasion

The aim of the current study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib and intermittent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with severe portal vein invasion. The antitumor effect was a complete response in 1 of 38 patients, a partial response in 12 patients, stable disease in 16 patients, and progressive disease in 9 patients, for a 34.2% response rate and a 76.3% disease control rate. This regimen had favorable efficacy and acceptable safety and may be feasible for unresectable HCC with severe portal vein invasion.

Argentinian clinical practice guideline for surveillance, diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The A.A.E.E.H has developed this guideline for the best care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Argentina. It was done from May 2018 to March 2020. Specific clinical research questions were systematically searched. The quality of evidence and level of recommendations were organized according to GRADE. HCC surveillance is strongly recommended with abdominal ultrasound (US) every six months in the population at risk for HCC (cirrhosis, hepatitis B or hepatitis C); it is suggested to add alpha-feto protein (AFP) levels in case of inexeperienced sonographers. Imaging diagnosis in patients at risk for HCC has high specificity and tumor biopsy is not mandatory. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm is strongly recommended for HCC staging and treatment-decision processes. Liver resection is strongly recommended for patients without portal hypertension and preserved liver function. Composite models are suggested for liver transplant selection criteria. Therapies for HCC with robust clinical evidence include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and first to second line systemic treatment options (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab has failed to show statistical benefit but the novel combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently shown survival benefit over sorafenib in frontline.

GINS1 Induced Sorafenib Resistance by Promoting Cancer Stem Properties in Human Hepatocellular Cancer Cells

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by a high rate of incidence and recurrence, and resistance to chemotherapy may aggravate the poor prognosis of HCC patients. Sorafenib resistance is a conundrum to the treatment of advanced/recurrent HCC. Therefore, studies on the molecular pathogenesis of HCC and the resistance to sorafenib are of great interest. Here, we report that GINS1 was highly expressed in HCC tumors, associated with tumor grades, and predicted poor patient survival using Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases exploration. Cell cycle, cell proliferation assay and in vivo xenograft mouse model indicated that knocking down GINS1 induced in G1/S phase cell cycle arrest and decreased tumor cells proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Spheroid formation assay results showed that GINS1 promoted the stem cell activity of HCC tumor cells. Furthermore, GEO database (GSE17112) analysis showed that HRAS oncogenic gene set was enriched in GINS1 high-expressed cancer cells, and quantitative real-time PCR, and Western blot results proved that GINS1 enhanced HCC progression through regulating HRAS signaling pathway. Moreover, knocking down endogenous GINS1 with shGINS1 increased the sensitivity of HCC cells to sorafenib, and restoring HRAS or stem associated pathway partly recovered the sorafenib resistance. Overall, the collective findings highlight GINS1 functions in hepatocarcinogenesis and sorafenib resistance, and indicate its potential use of GINS1 in drug-resistant HCC.

Stent placement combined with intraluminal radiofrequency ablation and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancers with biliary obstruction: a multicentre, retrospective, controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of stent placement combined with intraluminal radiofrequency ablation (intra-RFA) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (Ad-BTCs) and biliary obstruction (BO).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data for patients with Ad-BTCs and BO who underwent stent placement with or without intra-RFA and HAIC in three centres between November 2013 and November 2018. The stent patency time (SPT), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 135 enrolled patients, 64 underwent stent placement combined with intra-RFA and HAIC, while 71 underwent only stent placement. The median SPT was significantly longer in the combination group (8.2 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1-9.3) than in the control group (4.3 months, 95% CI: 3.6-5.0; p < 0.001). A similar result was observed for OS (combination: 13.2 months, 95% CI: 11.1-16.5; control: 8.5 months, 95% CI: 7.6-9.6; p < 0.001). The incidence of AEs related to biliary tract operation was not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). The most common AE and serious AE related to HAIC were alanine aminotransferase elevation (24/64; 37.5%) and thrombocytopenia (8/64; 12.5%), respectively. All AEs were tolerable, and there was no death from AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent placement combined with intra-RFA and HAIC may be a safe, potential treatment strategy for patients with Ad-BTCs and BO.

KEY POINTS

• Advanced biliary cancers (Ad-BTCs) with biliary obstruction (BO) can rapidly result in liver failure and cachexia with an extremely poor prognosis. • Stent placement combined with intraluminal radiofrequency ablation and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy may be safe and effective for patients with Ad-BTCs and BO. • The long-term efficacy and safety of the combined treatment is promising.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Followed by Lipiodol Infusion for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Single-Center Experience

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) followed by lipiodol infusion in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who received HAIC with regimens of cisplatin, mitomycin-C, and 5-fluorouracil followed by lipiodol infusion were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was tumor response rate. The modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was used for assessment of treatment response. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Prognostic factors for survival also were evaluated. Results: The median OS and PFS were 11.9 and 9.5 months, respectively. Seventeen patients (53.1%) achieved objective response, and 23 patients (71.9%) achieved disease control. The length of survival in the responder and disease control groups was longer than in the non-responder and progressive disease groups after two cycles of HAIC (responder vs. non-responder: 16.5 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.001; disease control vs. progressive disease: 12.3 vs. 5.6 months, p < 0.001) and after completing HAIC (responder vs. non-responder: 15.7 vs. 6.9 months, p = 0.001; disease control vs. progressive disease: 13.6 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.001). Better survival was associated with Child-Pugh A liver function (p = 0.013), with early response to two HAIC cycles (p = 0.009), and with response (p = 0.02) and disease control (p = 0.001) after completing HAIC treatment. Conclusion: HAIC followed by lipiodol infusion is a safe and feasible treatment for advanced HCC with PVTT. Patients with early response could continue HAIC treatment with expected prolonged survival.

Combination Therapy of Chemoembolization and Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis Compared with Chemoembolization Alone: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background

Survival of patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is extremely poor; transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a treatment for patients with HCC and PVTT. Some studies showed that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might improve the survival of HCC with PVTT. There were few researches of combining TACE with HAIC for patients with HCC and PVTT.

Aim

This study was aimed at comparing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) following treatment with conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (cTACE-HAIC) or conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

Methods

From January 2011 to December 2016, 155 patients with HCC and PVTT who received cTACE-HAIC (cTACE-HAIC group) (n = 86) or cTACE alone (cTACE group) (n = 69) were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score matching (PSM) reduced the confounding bias and yielded 60 matched patient pairs. The tumors' responses were evaluated using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). OS and PFS of groups were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 93 months (range: 1-93 months). The cTACE-HAIC group's OS (9.0 months) and PFS (6.0 months) were significantly longer than the cTACE group's OS (5.0 months) and PFS (2.0 months) (p = 0.018 and p = 0.045, respectively) in the matched cohort. Multivariate analyses showed that cTACE-HAIC was independently associated with OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.602, p = 0.010) and PFS (HR 0.66, p = 0.038). The matched groups did not differ regarding grade 3 or 4 adverse events.

Conclusion

cTACE-HAIC was superior to cTACE alone regarding OS and PFS in patients with HCC and PVTT. Treatment-associated toxicities were generally well tolerated.

Current Molecular Biology and Therapeutic Strategy Status and Prospects for circRNAs in HBV-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are newly classified noncoding RNA (ncRNA) members with a covalently closed continuous loop structure that are involved in immune responses against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections and play important biological roles in the occurrence and pathogenesis of HCC progression. The roles of circRNAs in HBV-associated HCC (HBV-HCC) have gained increasing attention. Substantial evidence has revealed that both tissue and circulating circRNAs may serve as potential biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes. So far, at least four circRNA/miRNA regulatory axes such as circRNA_101764/miR-181, circRNA_100338/miR-141-3p, circ-ARL3/miR-1305, circ-ATP5H/miR-138-5p, and several circulating circRNAs were reported to be associated with HBV-HCC development. Notably, TGF/SMAD, JAK/STAT, Notch and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways may play pivotal roles in this HBV-driven HCC via several circRNAs. Moreover, in non-HBV HCC patients or HCC patients partially infected by HBV, numerous circRNAs have been identified to be important regulators impacting the malignant biological behavior of HCC. Furthermore, the role of circRNAs in HCC drug resistance has become a focus of research with the aim of reversing chemoresistance and immune resistance. Herein, we review the molecular biology of circRNAs in HBV-HCC and their potential in therapeutic strategies.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatobiliary Cancers: State of the Art

Simple Summary

Liver functional failure is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Systemic chemotherapy usually offers a modest benefit in terms of disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival at the cost of a significant percentage of adverse events. Liver malignancies are mostly perfused by the hepatic artery while the normal liver parenchyma by the portal vein network. On these bases, the therapeutic strategy consisting of hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy takes place. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on this approach from different points of view, such as techniques, drugs pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes for advanced hepatobiliary cancers. Most of the collected studies have several limitations: non-randomized retrospective design, a relatively small number of patients, the hepatic arterial administration of different chemotherapeutic agents, as well as its combination with a great heterogeneity of systemic agents. However, despite these limitations, the presented data show favorable results in terms of safety and efficacy for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy, with respect or in alternative to the gold standard treatment, even when they are combined with systemic treatments. Therefore, this therapeutic strategy may be an alternative or an integrative treatment option for advanced hepatobiliary cancers. Further and larger prospective, randomized, multi-center studies, with well-defined inclusion criteria and treatment strategies, are required to confirm the presented data.

Abstract

Liver functional failure is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Primary liver tumors grow up mainly in the liver, and thus happens for liver metastases deriving from other organs having a lower burden of disease at the primary site. Systemic chemotherapy usually offers a modest benefit in terms of disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival at the cost of a significant percentage of adverse events. Liver malignancies are mostly perfused by the hepatic artery while the normal liver parenchyma by the portal vein network. On these bases, the therapeutic strategy consisting of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy takes place. In literature, HAI chemotherapy was applied for the treatment of advanced hepatobiliary cancers with encouraging results. Different chemotherapeutic agents were used such as Oxaliplatin, Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, Floxuridine, 5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, individually or in combination. However, the efficacy of this treatment strategy remains controversial. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the current knowledge on this approach from different points of view, such as techniques, drugs pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes for advanced hepatobiliary cancers.

Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan: JSH Consensus Statements and Recommendations 2021 Update

The Clinical Practice Manual for Hepatocellular Carcinoma was published based on evidence confirmed by the Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma along with consensus opinion among a Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) expert panel on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines are based on original articles with extremely high levels of evidence, expert opinions on HCC management in clinical practice or consensus on newly developed treatments are not included. However, the practice manual incorporates the literature based on clinical data, expert opinion, and real-world clinical practice currently conducted in Japan to facilitate its use by clinicians. Alongside each revision of the JSH Guidelines, we issued an update to the manual, with the first edition of the manual published in 2007, the second edition in 2010, the third edition in 2015, and the fourth edition in 2020, which includes the 2017 edition of the JSH Guideline. This article is an excerpt from the fourth edition of the HCC Clinical Practice Manual focusing on pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of HCC. It is designed as a practical manual different from the latest version of the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines. This practice manual was written by an expert panel from the JSH, with emphasis on the consensus statements and recommendations for the management of HCC proposed by the JSH expert panel. In this article, we included newly developed clinical practices that are relatively common among Japanese experts in this field, although all of their statements are not associated with a high level of evidence, but these practices are likely to be incorporated into guidelines in the future. To write this article, coauthors from different institutions drafted the content and then critically reviewed each other's work. The revised content was then critically reviewed by the Board of Directors and the Planning and Public Relations Committee of JSH before publication to confirm the consensus statements and recommendations. The consensus statements and recommendations presented in this report represent measures actually being conducted at the highest-level HCC treatment centers in Japan. We hope this article provides insight into the actual situation of HCC practice in Japan, thereby affecting the global practice pattern in the management of HCC.

Conversion to Resectability Using Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective

To evaluate whether this conversion rate to resectability could be increased when patients are treated with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (TACE-HAIC) using oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin.

Background

Conventional TACE (c-TACE) is a common regimen for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which converts to curative-intent resection in about 10% of those patients. It is urgent need to investigated better regimen for those patients.

Methods

The data of 83 initially unresectable HCC patients were examined, including 41 patients in the TACE-HAIC group and 42 patients in the c-TACE group. Their response rate, conversion rate to resection, survival outcome, and adverse events were compared.

Results

The conversion rate was significantly better in the TACE-HAIC group than in the c-TACE group (48.8% vs 9.5%; P < 0.001). The TACE-HAIC had marginal superiority in overall response rate as compared to c-TACE (14.6% vs 2.4%; P = 0.107 [RECIST]; 65.9% vs 16.7%; P < 0.001 [mRECIST], respectively). The median progression-free survival was not available and 9.2 months for the TACE-HAIC and cTACE groups, respectively (hazard rate [HR]: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.70; P = 0.003). The median overall survival was not available and 13.5 months for the TACE-HAIC and c-TACE groups, respectively (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.34-1.17; P = 0.132). The 2 groups had similar rates of grade 3/4 adverse events (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

TACE-HAIC demonstrated a higher conversion rate and progression-free survival benefit than c-TACE and could be considered as a more effective regimen for patients with initially unresectable HCC. Future prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm it.

Conversion therapy for primary liver cancer: Indications and selective strategies

Primary liver cancer has an insidious onset and no specific symptoms at early stage. Most patients are in the middle or advanced stage when diagnosed, and only 20%-40% of patients meet the criteria for radical resection. At present, surgical resection is still the main radical treatment for primary liver cancer, but factors such as liver function decompensation, too large tumor volume, too small future liver remnant, intrahepatic multiple metastasis, tumor thrombus invading the large vessels or bile duct, and distant metastasis limit the application of surgical resection or liver transplantation. In recent years, with the advances of basic research of primary liver cancer, the development of surgical techniques and equipment, as well as the development of new molecular targeted drugs and immunotherapy drugs, a part of unresectable patients with primary liver cancer can receive conversion therapy to improve liver function, minimize tumor volume, minimize or inactivate tumor thrombus, and increase the residual liver volume. Following conversion therapy, patients with primary liver cancer can undergo surgical resection or liver transplantation, which greatly improve the therapeutic efficacy and patient survival.

The multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is one of the most common complications of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which refers to the advanced stage of HCC and indicates an extremely poor prognosis. Monotherapy cannot effectively prolong the survival benefit of patients with HCC-PVTT characterized by a high recurrence rate. With great progress in the area of immune and molecular targeted therapy, there comes a promising era of multidisciplinary management of HCC. Survival benefits can be achieved based on accurate diagnosis, staging, and multidisciplinary management. Additionally, in terms of the presence of controversy about the standard treatment algorithm and the absence of universal treatment guidelines, a multidisciplinary management program may afford the best hope for HCC-PVTT patients via appropriate implement of various treatment protocols.

Selection of first-line systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The majority of clinical trials of first-line systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) used placebo or sorafenib as comparators, and there are limited data providing a cross comparison of treatments in this setting, especially for newly-approved immune checkpoint inhibitor and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor combination treatments.

AIM

To systematically review and compare response rates, survival outcomes, and safety of first-line systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Science Direct, the Cochrane Database, Excerpta Medica Database, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 annual congress. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy enrolling adults with advanced/unresectable HCC. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials. A network meta-analysis was used to synthesize data and perform direct and indirect comparisons between treatments. P value, a frequentist analog to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, was used to rank treatments.

RESULTS

In total, 1398 articles were screened and 27 included. Treatments compared were atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, brivanib, donafenib, dovitinib, FOLFOX4, lenvatinib, linifanib, nintedanib, nivolumab, sorafenib, sunitinib, vandetanib, 11 sorafenib combination therapies, and three other combination therapies. For overall response rate, lenvatinib ranked 1/19, followed by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and nivolumab. For progression-free survival (PFS), atezolizumab + bevacizumab was ranked 1/15, followed by lenvatinib. With the exception of atezolizumab + bevacizumab [hazard ratios (HR)PFS = 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-1.25], the estimated HRs for PFS for all included treatments vs lenvatinib were > 1; however, the associated 95%CI passed through unity for bevacizumab plus erlotinib, linifanib, and FOLFOX4. For overall survival, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was ranked 1/25, followed by vandetanib 100 mg/d and donafinib, with lenvatinib ranked 6/25. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab was associated with a lower risk of death vs lenvatinib (HRos = 0.63; 95%CI: 0.44-0.89), while the HR for overall survival for most other treatments vs lenvatinib had associated 95%CIs that passed through unity. Vandetanib 300 mg/d and 100 mg/d were ranked 1/13 and 2/13, respectively, for the lowest incidence of treatment terminations due to adverse events, followed by sorafenib (5/13), lenvatinib (10/13), and atezolizumab + bevacizumab (13/13).

CONCLUSION

There is not one single first-line treatment for advanced HCC associated with superior outcomes across all outcome measurements. Therefore, first-line systemic treatment should be selected based on individualized treatment goals.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin With or Without Sorafenib as Initial Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

Our previous study showed that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) plus sorafenib provided a significant survival benefit over sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, it is unclear whether the survival benefit should be attributed to the synergism between HAIC and sorafenib or just HAIC alone. We aim to compare HAIC using FOLFOX plus sorafenib with HAIC alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study including 225 eligible patients treated with HAIC using FOLFOX (HAIC alone group, n=126, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m² and 2400 mg/m² for 46 hours, every 3 weeks) alone or HAIC plus sorafenib (soraHAIC group, n=99, sorafenib 400 mg twice daily). Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and propensity-score matching was used to reduce bias.

Results

The soraHAIC group showed a longer overall survival (12.9 [95% CI, 10.4-15.4] vs. 10.5 [95% CI, 9.5-11.5] months, HR=0.71 [95% CI, 0.53-0.96]; P=0.025), a better progression free survival (7.0 [95% CI, 5.3-8.8] vs. 5.3 [95% CI, 3.5-7.1] months, HR=0.76 [95% CI, 0.58-0.99]; P=0.046), and a higher disease control rate (RECIST 1.1: 74.8% vs. 61.1%, P=0.030) than the HAIC alone group. In multivariate analysis, soraHAIC was an independent favor factor for survival. In terms of the grade 3/4 adverse event, hand–foot skin reaction was more frequent in the soraHAIC group than the HAIC alone group. In the propensity-score matched cohorts (93 pairs), the overall survival, the progression free survival and disease control rates in the soraHAIC group were also better than those in the HAIC group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

HAIC plus sorafenib may improve overall survival and progression free survival compared with HAIC alone as initial treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Recurrence Pattern in Patients with Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested that neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has value as a predictor of long-term outcomes in various cancer types. Its prognostic potential in patients with CRLM has not been thoroughly investigated. This original, retrospective study assessed the relationship between the preoperative NLR, survival outcomes, and recurrence patterns in patients after colorectal liver metastasis resection (CRLM).

METHODS

The prospectively maintained database of a tertiary medical center was queried for all patients who underwent CRLM resection between 2005 and 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: NLR <3 (normal) or >3 (high). Recurrence risk was analysed using Fine and Gray correction for competing risk method and cause specific analyses.

RESULTS

The cohort included 231 patients of whom 53 (23%) had a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. At presentation, 35% had synchronous disease and 48% had a solitary metastasis; median tumor size was 2 cm. Patients with a high NLR had a significantly higher rate of simultaneous colorectal resection (P = 0.01). A high NLR was independently associated with worse OS (P = 0.02), worse DFS (P = 0.03), and higher risk of recurrence (P = 0.048), specifically recurrence with an extrahepatic pattern (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

A high preoperative NLR was independently associated with poorer survival outcomes and extrahepatic recurrence pattern. The NLR appears to have prognostic importance in CRLM and may serve as a surrogate marker of aggressive systemic disease after resection. These findings warrant external validation, preferably in a prospective design.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Radiologic and Clinical Factors Predictive of Survival

OBJECTIVE. The goal of this study was to evaluate radiologic and clinical factors associated with overall survival of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. This single-center retrospective study included 180 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent HAIC with a 5-fluorouracil (250-500 mg/m² for 5 hours) plus cisplatin (10-20 mg/m² for 1-2 hours) regimen via an implantable port system. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests. Factors associated with overall survival were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS. The median overall survival time was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.1-9.1), and the objective response rate was 15%. In multivariate analysis, infiltrative tumor growth (hazard ratio [HR], 1.002; p = .03) and rimlike arterial enhancement (HR, 3.040; p < .001) were pretreatment radiologic factors associated with reduced overall survival. No early response to treatment (HR, 2.064-6.491) and higher Child-Pugh class (HR, 2.010-2.815) were strong prognostic factors of poor outcome. Treatment with three or more HAIC cycles (HR, 0.371; p = .001) and high-dose HAIC (HR, 0.447; p < .001) were favorable for increased overall survival. CONCLUSION. Infiltrative tumor growth and rimlike arterial enhancement in pre-treatment imaging studies were associated with poor prognosis, and better early radiologic response and preserved liver function reserve were strong indicators of prolonged survival. Recognizing these radiologic and clinical predictors may help optimize care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Comparison of HBV reactivation between patients with high HBV-DNA and low HBV-DNA loads undergoing PD-1 inhibitor and concurrent antiviral prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor is recommended to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the safety of PD-1 inhibitor in patients with high HBV-DNA load is unknown because of the potential risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. This study was to compare the HBV reactivation between patients with low HBV-DNA loads and high HBV-DNA loads undergoing antiviral prophylaxis and PD-1 inhibitor.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including consecutive hepatitis B surface antigen-positive HCC patients who received PD-1 inhibitor and concurrent antiviral prophylaxis for prevention of clinical hepatitis. Patients were divided into low HBV-DNA group (low group, ≤ 500 IU/ml) and high HBV-DNA group (high group, > 500 IU/ml) according to the baseline HBV-DNA level. The incidences of HBV reactivation, HBV-associated hepatitis, and PD-1 inhibitor disruption were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred two eligible patients were included: 94 in the low group and 108 in the high group. Seven patients (5 in the low group and 2 in the high group) developed HBV reactivation, and all recovered from HBV reactivation and HBV-associated hepatitis. The incidence of HBV reactivation in the two groups was low (5.3% vs 1.9%, P = 0.34). There was also no difference in the incidence of HBV-associated hepatitis (P = 0.56), or PD-1 inhibitor disruption (P = 0.82). The multivariable analysis showed PD-1 inhibitor with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was the only significant risk factor for HBV reactivation (P = 0.04) and hepatitis (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

With concurrent antiviral prophylaxis, HBV-DNA load higher than 500 IU/ml should not be a contraindication for PD-1 inhibitor.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Radiation Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombosis of the Main Trunk or Bilobar of the Portal Vein

BACKGROUND

Overall survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Vp4 (tumor thrombosis of the main trunk or bilobar of the portal vein) is extremely poor.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to clarify the prognosis of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with radiation therapy (RT) for advanced HCC with Vp4 and to analyze the factors that contribute to the prognosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 51 HCC patients who were treated with HAIC and RT for portal vein tumor thrombosis and met the following criteria were enrolled: (i) with Vp4; (ii) Child-Pugh score of 5-7; (iii) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; (iv) no history of systemic therapy; and (v) from September 2004 to April 2019.

RESULTS

Median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 12.1 and 4.2 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed >50% of relative tumor volume in the liver (HR, 3.027; p = 0.008) and extrahepatic spread with (HR, 3.773; p = 0.040) as significant and independent factors of OS. The total overall response rate (ORR) was 19.6%; ORR in main tumor was 13.7%; and ORR in Vp4 was 51.0%. None of the patients who received HAIC combined with RT for advanced HCC with Vp4 developed hepatic failure. This combination therapy of HAIC with RT was safe and well tolerated in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapies of HAIC and RT might be good therapy for advanced HCC with Vp4.

Combination therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: do we see the light at the end of the tunnel?

Importance

Combination therapies of anti-PD-1 and anti-angiogenesis regimens are emerging rapidly and exhibit more promising anti-tumor efficacy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and consistently it is the hotspot in clinical studies.

Objective

To elaborate several issues which are warranted further consideration as more regimens are being investigated in combination therapies.

Evidence Review

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar by 2021 February for publications on combination therapies for HCC.

Findings

Several clinical issues are worth reconsidering, such as the evaluation on appropriate primary endpoints in phase III clinical trials as for different practical problems, the translation of surrogate endpoint objective response rate (ORR) benefits into overall survival (OS) benefits, and whether conversion surgery contributes to initial expectations of long-term survival or not. New concepts in novel immunotherapy and targeted therapy in combination with loco-regional therapies may improve overall survival for HCC.

Conclusions and Relevance for Reviews

Comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of immunotherapy and targeted therapy contributes to better prognosis of advanced HCC and more explorative combination therapies are needed.