A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief

A new transmucosal drug delivery system for patients with breakthrough cancer pain: the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet

Breakthrough pain, a transitory severe pain with the background of otherwise controlled persistent pain has a prevalence between 52% and 67% in outpatients with cancer. Medications for such sudden-onset pain require non-invasive delivery of a potent and short-acting opioid for rapid pain relief. Although oral transmucosal delivery of fentanyl citrate (OTFC) has been shown to provide better pain relief than a typical oral opioid administration such as morphine sulfate immediate release (MSIR) in the management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer-related pain, newer delivery systems offer a potential for further enhancement of pain relief. The fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet (FBT) formulation employs a novel drug delivery system that relies on an effervescence reaction to improve buccal fentanyl absorption. Using the effervescence reaction results in the production and dissipation of carbon dioxide with a dynamic shift in pH as the tablet dissolves. The induced low pH favors dissolution of fentanyl citrate in saliva (higher water solubility). The subsequent increase in pH thereafter favors the buccal absorption of non-ionized fentanyl across the buccal mucosa. Such a pH “pumping” mechanism increases the permeation of fentanyl into and through the buccal to the vascular system from where the agent is transported to the specific opioid receptor sites in the CNS. Compared with OTFC, data in healthy volunteers show that the effervescence reaction employed in FBT increases the total amount and the speed of absorption of fentanyl being absorbed. Compared with OTFC there is an increase in peak fentanyl blood concentrations, and an enhancement of the amount of buccal delivery of fentanyl. Such favorable data are underlined by the results of clinical studies where the FBT technology was studied in patients with breakthrough pain in chronic malignant pathologies.

Oxycodone controlled-release as first-choice therapy for moderate-to-severe cancer pain in Italian patients: results of an open-label, multicentre, observational study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cancer pain affects patients at all stages of the disease and there are clear guidelines for its management. Morphine is considered the first-choice strong opioid in the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain; however, numerous studies have shown that oxycodone controlled-release (CR) has a similar efficacy and safety profile. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oxycodone CR as a first-line strong opioid for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain in Italian cancer patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, observational trial carried out at 15 locations across Italy. Patients with a referral for cancer-related pain of > or =5 on a 10-point numerical rating scale were enrolled. Patients were treated with oral oxycodone CR and monitored for 21 days. Dosage was individualized for each patient and up-titrated until effective pain control was achieved. Pain, adverse events and quality-of-life scores were assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

390 patients (174 females and 216 males) with a mean age of 66 +/- 11 years were evaluated. The average daily dose ranged from 22.84 on day 1 to 40 mg/day on day 21. Pain intensity (assessed on a 10-point numerical rating scale) decreased significantly within 1 day of treatment commencement (p = 0.00001) and continued to decrease throughout the study period (from a mean 7.22 at baseline to a mean 2.11 points on day 21). Adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and consisted of common opioid-related events. Ten patients (2.6%) discontinued the study because of adverse events and four (1%) because of uncontrolled pain. All aspects of activities of daily life assessed were improved by study end.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxycodone CR is efficacious and well tolerated as a first-line strong opioid for the treatment of moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain in Italian patients.

Treatment efficacy of neural blockade in specialized palliative care services in Japan: a multicenter audit survey

More than 85% of cancer-related pain is pharmacologically controllable, but some patients require interventional treatments. Although audit assessment of these interventions is of importance to clarify the types of patients likely to receive benefits, there have been no multicenter studies in Japan. The primary aims of this study were (1) to clarify the frequency of neural blockade in certified palliative care units and palliative care teams, (2) determine the efficacy of interventions, and (3) explore the predictors of successful or unsuccessful intervention. All patients who received neural blockade were consecutively recruited from seven certified palliative care units and five hospital palliative care teams in Japan. Primary responsible physicians reported pain intensity on the Support Team Assessment Schedule, performance status, communication levels on the Communication Capacity Scale, presence or absence of delirium, opioid consumption, and adverse effects before and one week after the procedure on the basis of retrospective chart review. A total of 162 interventions in 136 patients were obtained, comprising 3.8% of all patients receiving specialized palliative care services during the study period. Common procedures were epidural nerve block with local anesthetic and/or opioids (n = 84), neurolytic sympathetic plexus block (n = 24), and intrathecal nerve block with phenol (n = 21). There were significant differences in the frequency of neural blockade between palliative care units and palliative care teams (3.1% vs. 4.6%, respectively, P = 0.018), and between institutions whose leading physicians are anesthesiologists or have other specialties (4.8% vs. 1.5%, respectively, P < 0.001). Pain intensity measured on the Support Team Assessment Schedule (2.9 +/- 0.8 to 1.7 +/- 0.9, P < 0.001), performance status (2.7 +/- 1.0 to 2.4 +/- 1.0, P < 0.001), and opioid consumption (248 +/- 348 to 186 +/- 288 mg morphine equivalent/day, P < 0.001) were significantly improved after interventions. There was a tendency toward improvement in the communication level measured on the Communication Capacity Scale. There was no significant improvement in the prevalence of delirium, but six patients (32%) recovered from delirium after interventions. Adverse effects occurred in 9.2%, but all were predictable or transient. No fatal complications were reported. Pain intensity was significantly more improved in patients who survived 28 days or longer than others (P = 0.002). There were no significant correlations of changes in pain intensity with the performance status or previous opioid consumption. In conclusion, neural blockade was performed in 3.8% of cancer patients who received specialized palliative care services in Japan. Neural blockade could contribute to the improvement of pain intensity, performance service status, and opioid consumption without unpredictable serious side effects.

Cancer pain and analgesia

Pain ranges in prevalence from 14-100% among cancer patients and occurs in 50-70% of those in active treatment. Cancer pain may result from direct invasion of tumor into nerves, bones, soft tissue, ligaments, and fascia, and may induce visceral pain through distension and obstruction. Cancer pain is multifaceted. Clinicians may describe cancer pain as acute, chronic, nociceptive (somatic), visceral, or neuropathic. Despite implementation of the WHO guidelines, reports of undertreatment of cancer pain persist in various clinical settings and in spite of decades of work to reduce unnecessary discomfort. Substantial obstacles to adequate pain relief with opioids include specific concerns of patients themselves, their family members, physicians, nurses, and the healthcare system. The WHO analgesic ladder serves as the mainstay of treatment for the relief of cancer pain in concert with tumoricidal, surgical, interventional, radiotherapeutic, psychological, and rehabilitative modalities. This multidimensional approach offers the greatest potential for maximizing analgesia and minimizing adverse effects. Primary therapies are directed at the source of the cancer pain and may enhance a patient's function, longevity, and comfort. Adjuvant therapies include nonopioids that confer analgesic effects in certain medical conditions but primarily treat conditions that do not involve pain. Nonopioid medications (over-the-counter agents) are useful in the management of mild to moderate pain, and their continuation through step 3 of the WHO ladder is an option after weighing a drug's risks and benefits in individual patients. Symptomatic treatment of severe cancer pain should begin with an opioid, regardless of the mechanism of the pain. They are very effective analgesics, titrate easily, and offer a favorable risk/benefit ratio. Cancer pain remains inadequately controlled despite the diagnostic and therapeutic means of ensuring that patients feel comfortable during their illness. Therefore, all practitioners need to make control of cancer pain a professional duty, even if they can only use the most basic and least expensive analgesic medications, such as morphine, codeine, and acetaminophen, to reduce human suffering.

Efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 289 patients with severe cancer pain

Strong opioids are recommended for treating severe cancer pain in the advanced stages of the disease. Few data are available concerning the efficacy of buprenorphine in cancer pain. We compared transdermal buprenorphine 70 microg/h (BUP TDS) to placebo in an enriched design study. Opioid-tolerant patients with cancer pain requiring strong opioids in the dose range of 90-150 mg/d oral morphine equivalents entered a two-week run-in phase, during which they were converted to BUP TDS. Patients who could be stabilized on BUP TDS were randomized to BUP TDS or placebo patch for a two-week maintenance phase. Rescue medication (buprenorphine sublingual tablets 0.2mg) was allowed as required. Response was defined as a mean pain intensity of <5 (0-10 scale) and a mean daily buprenorphine sublingual tablet intake of < or =2 tablets during the maintenance phase. Of 289 patients who entered the run-in phase, 100 discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy or adverse events; 189 patients continued treatment in the maintenance phase (94 BUP TDS, 95 placebo), of whom 31 discontinued treatment (7 BUP TDS, 24 placebo). A significant difference in the number of treatment responders was observed: 70 BUP TDS (74.5%, 65.7-83.3) vs. 47 placebo (50%, 39.9-60.1) (P=0.0003). This result was supported by a lower daily pain intensity, lower intake of buprenorphine sublingual tablets and fewer dropouts in the BUP TDS group. The incidence of adverse events was slightly higher for BUP TDS. In conclusion, BUP TDS 70 microg/h is an efficacious and safe treatment for patients with severe cancer pain.

Management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer

Breakthrough pain (BTP) in patients with cancer lacks a consensus definition and is subsequently inadequately diagnosed and assessed, therefore making it more challenging to manage. Cancer pain is generally moderate to severe in intensity and persistent in nature. Despite the problematic definition of BTP, it is generally described as having similar intensity, but may also be transitory and variable in predictability. Most breakthrough analgesia fails to be effective in the time required for BTP. No useful analgesia is therefore provided but drug adverse effects escalate. Cancer pain management relies on the WHO analgesic ladder. The frequency of BTP and its inadequate management means that it has significant adverse effects on patients, their families and those involved in their care. This article outlines a systematic, clinical and evidence-based approach to managing BTP in patients with cancer that emphasizes a holistic approach and an understanding of multidimensional 'total pain'. Guidelines for managing BTP are presented and areas of developing research are identified.

To replace or not to replace? - Partial coning and a sixth nerve palsy secondary due to displacement of a tunnelled intrathecal catheter for pain control

We report the displacement of a tunnelled intrathecal catheter causing significant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, resulting in partial coning and a sixth nerve palsy. The patient had advanced malignant mesothelioma and all other methods of pain control had been unsuccessful. As far as we are aware, there are no published reports of early replacement of an intrathecal catheter in patients with neurological sequelae. Surgical re-siting of the intrathecal catheter produced good pain relief for many months. Doctors involved in the use of indwelling intrathecal catheters for pain control must be aware of the risk of significant neurological sequelae but should not dismiss re-establishment of intrathecal therapy in the presence of significant neurological complications.

Current concepts in pain management: pharmacologic options for the pediatric, geriatric, hepatic and renal failure patient

This article provides a review for current practice. Strict guidelines are not available on some topics, and they may never be drafted because pain is such a unique individual experience. It is recommended to coordinate care with other medical specialties when patients present with organ dysfunctions or are at the extremes of age. More data are required in the field of pain management, particularly with regard to renal and hepatic dysfunction. In turn, these data serve as a foundation for physicians making practice decisions based on current evidence. Until this is achieved, clinicians must rely on anecdotal evidence and the experiences of others to treat a complex issue: pain.

Oral morphine overdose in a cancer patient antagonized by prolonged naloxone infusion

An 80-year-old male was diagnosed with carcinoma in the lung with multiple bony metastases and had been prescribed pain medications as per World Health Organization analgesic ladder guidelines. However, he was not getting adequate pain relief and there were difficulties in titration of the morphine doses on an outpatient basis. Therefore, he was hospitalized for dose titration of oral morphine and was coprescribed amitriptyline and ranitidine. During the titration of the analgesic dose, he developed severe symptoms of morphine overdose. He was immediately treated with intravenous naloxone. After prolonged infusion of naloxone, he achieved his baseline vital parameters without any permanent sequel to the overdose event. This case report describes the possible causes of oral morphine overdose in the elderly and its successful treatment. To prevent such complications, one has to be very cautious of other factors such as drug interactions, particularly in the elderly.

Initial evaluation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided direct Ganglia neurolysis and block

BACKGROUND

Celiac plexus neurolysis and block are considered safe but provide limited pain relief. Standard techniques target the region of the celiac plexus but do not attempt injections directly into celiac ganglia. The recent recognition that celiac ganglia can be visualized by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) now allows direct injection into celiac ganglia for neurolysis (CGN) and block (CGB).

AIMS

To determine the safety and initial efficacy (at 2-4 wk) of direct ganglia injection in patients with moderate to severe pain secondary to unresectable pancreatic carcinoma or chronic pancreatitis.

METHODS

An EUS database was reviewed to identify patients undergoing CGN and CGB. Data were retrieved from the medical records and phone follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients underwent 36 direct celiac ganglia injections for unresectable pancreatic cancer (CGN N = 17, CGB N = 1) or chronic pancreatitis (CGN N = 5, CGB N = 13) with bupivacaine (0.25%) and alcohol (99%) for CGN, or Depo-Medrol (80 mg/2 cc) for CGB. Cancer patients reported pain relief in 16/17 (94%) when alcohol was injected and 0/1 (00%) when steroid was injected. For chronic pancreatitis, 4/5 (80%) who received alcohol reported pain relief versus 5/13 (38%) receiving steroids. Thirteen (34%) patients experienced initial pain exacerbation, which correlated with improved therapeutic response (P < 0.05). Transient hypotension and diarrhea developed in 12 and 6 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial experience suggests that EUS-guided direct celiac ganglion block or neurolysis is safe. Alcohol injection into ganglia appears to be effective in both cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Prospective trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of this new approach.

High prevalence of pain in patients with cancer in a large population-based study in The Netherlands

At present, no definite conclusions can be drawn about the real extent of the pain suffered by cancer patients. A population-based study was conducted to obtain reliable information about the prevalence and severity of pain in cancer patients (all phases) and about predictors of pain. A representative sample of cancer patients was recruited in the area from a cancer registry. Pain was assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Adequacy of pain treatment was assessed with the Pain Management Index (PMI). We found that 55% of the 1429 respondents had experienced pain past week; in 44% (n=351), the pain was moderate to severe (BPI score>or= 4). Total prevalence of pain/moderate to severe pain was present in 49%/41% in patients with curative treatment >or=6 months ago, 57%/43% in patients with current curative treatment or treatment <6 months ago, 56%/43% in patients with current palliative anti-cancer treatment and in 75%/70% in patients for whom treatment was no longer feasible. Positive predictors of the prevalence of pain were lower education level, more advanced disease and haematological (excluding (non)-Hodgkin lymphoma), gastro-intestinal, lung, or breast malignancies. According to the PMI, analgesic treatment was inadequate in 42% of the patients. Negative predictors of adequate treatment were current curative anti-cancer treatment and low education level.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of cancer patients does suffer from moderate to severe pain and does not receive adequate pain treatment.

Quality of analgesic treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer: do we do a better job now? The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) experience

GOALS OF WORK

The aim of this study was to evaluate pain intensity and the application of the WHO guidelines for cancer pain treatment in patients with prostate cancer treated at Swiss cancer centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed a series of five multicenter phase II clinical trials which examined the palliative effect of different chemotherapies in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. Of 170 patients, 1,018 visits were evaluable for our purpose, including ratings of pain intensity by patients and prescribed analgesics.

MAIN RESULTS

No or mild pain was indicated by patients in 36 to 55% of the visits, more than mild pain in 30 to 46%. In 21% of the visits, the WHO pain treatment criteria (treatment according to one of the three steps; oral, rectal or transdermal application of the main dose; administration on a regular schedule) were fulfilled, and the Cleeland index was positive according to all recommendations. In 6% of the visits, neither the WHO criteria were fulfilled nor was the Cleeland index positive. This indicates insufficient pain treatment not following the WHO guidelines and that the prescribed analgesics were not sufficiently potent for the rated pain intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this selective Swiss sample, the standard of analgesic treatment is high. However, there is still scope for improvement. This cannot solely be solved by improving the knowledge of the physicians. Programs to change the patients' attitude towards cancer pain, training to improve the physicians' communication skills, and institutional changes may be promising strategies.

The relationship of subjective sleep quality, pain, and quality of life in advanced cancer patients

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Cancer patients have been reported to complain about poor quality of sleep. This study evaluated the quality of sleep in this group, utilizing demographic data and clinical features of the cancers as assessment criteria. A secondary aim was to evaluate the correlation between the self-rated questionnaire for the quality of sleep with other instruments used in measuring pain and quality of life.

DESIGN

A total of 102 patients with stage IV cancer completed the study and were subsequently followed for up to 10 months. Self-rated questionnaires were administered for the evaluation of quality of sleep (PSQI), quality of life Medical Outcomes Study 12-item short-form (SF-12) questionnaire, the Mental Component Summary (MSC) and the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and pain (VAS Pain). The mediation analysis model was also used to evaluate how quality of life can influence the quality of sleep through its relation to pain, the performance status of patients and analgesics (Opioids).

PATIENTS

The mean age of the study participants was 62.8 (range: 26.0-87.0) years old. The majority (70.6%) of the patients presented with ECOG score between 2 and 3 and with metastasis (58.8%).

RESULTS

Mean Global Sleep Quality score was 12.0+/-4.6. The use of the PSQI questionnaire in cancer patients demonstrated that these subjects were prone to sleep poor quality. However, the various demographic variables and clinical features of the cancers did not affect quality of sleep. Global Sleep Quality scores from the PSQI correlated with the scores obtained from the SF-12 questionnaire and with the VAS Pain results, indicating a relationship between quality of sleep, quality of life and pain. However, only the SF-12 questionnaire had predictive value on quality of sleep. Mediation analysis showed that quality of life influences quality of sleep both directly and indirectly by its effect on pain. In addition, some of the effect of quality of life on sleep quality was mediated by the use of opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of sleep in patients suffering from stage IV cancer was significantly decreased. Demographic data and clinical variables of cancers did not affect the PSQI Global Sleep Quality score. The use of the mediation model also provides evidence that quality of sleep, quality of life, pain, and opioids are strictly correlated each other.

Management strategies for pain in breast carcinoma patients: current opinions and future perspectives

Breast cancer is the most frequently encountered carcinoma in women worldwide. Pain is the most distressing symptom in patients with breast carcinoma and can occur at all stages of the disease due to the cancer per se as well as due to various diagnostic and treatment modalities. A proper pain assessment helps in identification of pain syndromes and guides in formulating analgesic strategies. Primary therapies of breast carcinoma like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for bony metastases can cause substantial pain relief. However, multimodal analgesic approaches incorporating pharmacological, interventional as well as non-conventional techniques should be employed prior to, in conjunction with, and after primary therapies of breast cancer. The prevalence of chronic neuropathic pain following breast cancer surgery may exceed 50% by current estimates, and with the increase in life expectancy of these patients, providing adequate pain relief is of paramount importance to improve their quality of life. In this review, we discuss prevailing methods of evaluation and management of pain in patients of breast carcinoma and the new techniques that may become the mainstay of pain management protocols in future.

Opioid rotation from high-dose morphine to transdermal buprenorphine (Transtec) in chronic pain patients

Opioid rotation is increasingly becoming an option to improve pain management especially in long-term treatment. Because of insufficient analgesia and intolerable side effects, a total of 42 patients (23 male, 19 female; mean age 64.1 years) suffering from severe musculoskeletal (64%), cancer (21%) or neuropathic (19%) pain were converted from high-dose morphine (120 to >240 mg/day) to transdermal buprenorphine. The dose of buprenorphine necessary for conversion (at least 52.5 microg/h) was titrated individually by the treating physician. No conversion recommendations were given and the treating physician used his or her own judgment for dose adjustment. Pain relief, overall satisfaction and quality of sleep (very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or very poor), and the incidence and severity of adverse drug reactions over a period of at least 10 weeks and up to 1 year was assessed. Following rotation, patients experiencing good/very good pain relief increased from 5% to 76% (P < 0.001). Only 5% reported insufficient relief. Relief was achieved with buprenorphine alone in 77.4%, while 17% needed an additional opioid for breakthrough pain. Sleep quality (good/very good) increased from 14% to 74% (P < 0.005). Adverse effects were reported in 11.9%, mostly because of local irritation, did not result in termination of therapy. Neither tolerance nor refractory effect following rotation from morphine to buprenorphine was noted. Conversion tables with a fixed conversion ratio are of limited value in patients treated with high-dose morphine.

Incidence and Management of Phantom Limb Pain According to World Health Organization Analgesic Ladder in Amputees of Malignant Origin

Antidepressants and anticonvulsants are currently considered to be the drug treatment of choice for neuropathic pain. Opioids are effective in relieving neuropathic pain, including phantom pain in the early postoperative course. The present study of 42 cancer patients with limb amputation was conducted to determine the incidence of phantom limb pain and phantom sensation and to test the utility of the World Health Organization 3-step analgesic ladder in phantom limb pain management. Patients were monitored monthly for the first 2 months postoperatively and every 2 months thereafter for 2 years. The World Health Organization analgesic ladder was followed for pain management. The patients complaining of phantom sensation, phantom pain, and stump pain decreased from 69%, 60%, and 31%, respectively, at 1 month to 32%, 32%, and 5%, at the end of 2 years with the addition of opioids. The World Health Organization analgesic ladder played significant role in phantom limb pain management.

Orofacial pain in cancer: part II--clinical perspectives and management

Cancer-associated pain is extremely common and is associated with significant physical and psychological suffering. Unfortunately, pain associated with cancer or its treatment is frequently under-treated, probably due to several factors, including phobia of opioids, under-reporting by patients, and under-diagnosis by healthcare workers. The most common etiology of cancer pain is local tumor invasion (primary or metastatic), involving inflammatory and neuropathic mechanisms; these have been reviewed in Part I. As malignant disease advances, pain usually becomes more frequent and more intense. Additional expressions of orofacial cancer pain include distant tumor effects, involving paraneoplastic mechanisms. Pain secondary to cancer therapy varies with the treatment modalities used: Chemo-radiotherapy protocols are typically associated with painful mucositis and neurotoxicity. Surgical therapies often result in nerve and tissue damage, leading, in the long term, to myofascial and neuropathic pain syndromes. In the present article, we review the clinical presentation of cancer-associated orofacial pain at various stages: initial diagnosis, during therapy (chemo-, radiotherapy, surgery), and in the post-therapy period. As a presenting symptom of orofacial cancer, pain is often of low intensity and diagnostically unreliable. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of pain in cancer require knowledge of the presenting characteristics, factors, and mechanisms involved.

Weak opioids--an educational substitute for morphine?

The World Health Organization guidelines suggest the use of weak opioids on the second step of the analgesic ladder for cancer pain relief. Weak opioids are important substitutes for low doses of morphine, although their analgesic efficacy is lower than that of non-opioid or strong opioid analgesics. The use of weak opioids has great educational impact and has helped spread the use of the guidelines. Furthermore, weak opioids are more freely available and are expected to have a better side-effect profile. Controlled long-term studies are required for confirmation.

Anaesthesia and palliative care

Palliative medicine provides end-of-life care to terminally ill patients with a focus on pain and symptom management, psychosocial and spiritual support and bereavement follow-up. This article reviews some of the more recent literature on the subject of palliative care focusing on educational barriers to quality palliative care, advances in quality assessment, and advances in pain and symptom management.

Impact of an Educational Program on Pain Management in Patients With Cancer Living at Home

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of an educational homecare program on pain relief in patients with advanced cancer.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental (pretest post-test, nonequivalent group).

SETTING

Four community-based primary care centers providing social and healthcare services in the Quebec City region of Canada.

SAMPLE

80 homecare patients with advanced cancer who were free of cognitive impairment, who presented with pain or were taking analgesics to relieve pain, and who had a life expectancy of six weeks or longer.

METHODS

The educational intervention included information regarding pain assessment and monitoring using a daily pain diary and the provision of specific recommendations in case of loss of pain control. Pain intensity data were collected prior to the intervention, and reassessments were made two and four weeks later. Data on beliefs were collected at baseline and two weeks. All data were collected by personal interviews.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Patients beliefs about the use of opioids; average and maximum pain intensities.

FINDINGS

Patients beliefs regarding the use of opioids were modified successfully following the educational intervention. Average pain was unaffected in the control group and was reduced significantly in patients who received the educational program. The reduction remained after controlling for patients initial beliefs. Maximum pain decreased significantly over time in both the experimental and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An educational intervention can be effective in improving the monitoring and relief of pain in patients with cancer living at home.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Homecare nurses can be trained to effectively administer the educational program during their regular homecare visits.

Multidisciplinary management of cancer pain: a longitudinal retrospective study on a cohort of end-stage cancer patients

The epidemiology of cancer pain and the outcomes associated with pain treatments were investigated through a retrospective survey of 772 patients with advanced cancer. The cumulative prevalence of pain was 87%, including all types of cancer. Mean duration of pain was 6.9+/-8.1 months. The prevalence of pain was 28%, 46%, 67%, 75%, and 79% at 6 months, 3 months, 1 month, 1 week, and 1 day before the time of death, respectively. The so-called "strong" opioids had been used in 85% of the 669 patients with pain. Seventy-nine percent of patients with pain received nonsurgical antineoplastic treatment for pain control. No more than 11% of patients ultimately experienced substantial pain in the last 6 months of life (defined as pain score 5-10 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale). We conclude that the application of a multidisciplinary approach to pain management offers effective pain control for most patients with advanced cancer.

Efficacy of the World Health Organization Analgesic Ladder to Treat Pain in End-Stage Renal Disease

Pain is the one of the most common symptoms experienced by patients with ESRD; it impairs their quality of life and is undertreated. Most pain clinicians believe that the pain management approach of the World Health Organization (WHO) three-step analgesic ladder is applicable to the treatment of patients with ESRD, but this approach has not been validated for them. A cohort of 45 hemodialysis patients were assessed for type and severity of pain using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire and then treated during a 4-wk period according to the WHO analgesic ladder. Mean age was 65 +/- 12.5 yr, and 22 (49%) patients had diabetic nephropathy as the cause of ESRD. Initial pain was rated severe by 34 (76%) patients. There was no difference in initial pain rating by gender, age, race, or type of pain. Forty percent of patients reported nociceptive pain, 31% neuropathic, and 29% both. Adequate analgesia was achieved in 43 (96%) of 45 patients. The mean pain score decreased from 7.8 +/- 1.2 to 1.6 +/- 1.3 (P < 0.001). Patients who were 65 yr and older had higher posttreatment scores than those who were younger than 65 (2.1 +/- 1.4 versus 0.94 +/- 0.93; P = 0.002) and more medication adverse effects. It is concluded that the use of the WHO three-step analgesic ladder leads to effective pain relief in hemodialysis patients. Older patients will need more careful pain management to achieve the same results as younger patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in a larger, more diverse dialysis population.

Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy of Opioid Switching in Cancer Patients

Pain is one of the most common and often most feared symptoms in patients with cancer. Ongoing or progressive pain is physically debilitating and has a marked impact on quality of life. Since a third of the population will die from cancer, and of these, 80% will experience severe pain in their final year of life, effective treatment of cancer-related pain remains both a high priority and an ongoing challenge in clinical practice. Individuals with moderate to severe cancer-related pain require treatment with strong analgesics, namely opioids. There is evidence to support the therapeutic maneuver of opioid switching in clinical practice, but further evidence is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms for interindividual differences in response to different opioids. Large, robust clinical trials will be needed if clinical differences among side-effect profiles of different opioids are to be clearly demonstrated. This review discusses candidate genes, which contribute to opioid response; many other genes have also been implicated in "pain" from animal or human studies. In order to continue to evaluate the genetic contributions to both pain susceptibility and analgesic response, further candidate genes need to be considered. Good pain control remains a high priority for clinicians and patients, and there is much work to be done to further individualize analgesic therapy for patients with cancer.

The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain control, twenty years of use. How much pain relief does one get from using it?

INTRODUCTION

Pain is a major problem in the treatment of patients with cancer. This article reviews studies concerning evaluation of patients with cancer pain treated according to The World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic search of PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, BDENF, and OVID and a hand search of reference lists and textbooks from 1982 to 2004 were performed.

RESULT

Analgesia was considered adequate in 45 to 100% of patients analyzed in the studies.

CONCLUSION

However, the evidence that they provide is insufficient to grant the effectiveness of the WHO guidelines because a controlled clinical trial of this intervention has never been published.

Symptom profiles and palliative care in advanced pancreatic cancer: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To describe prospectively the prevalence and severity of disease-related symptoms, quality of life (QOL) and need for palliative care in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients treated for advanced pancreatic cancer filled in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) for symptom registration and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 quality of life questionnaires at first contact (baseline) and the ESAS in the following consultations. Need for palliative interventions were registered.

RESULTS

Of the 22 women and 29 men (mean age, 62 years), 20 had locally unresectable cancer, 19 had metastatic disease, and 12 had recurrent disease after curative resection. Forty-six patients died during follow-up (median survival, 99 days). At baseline, patients reported significantly impaired QOL on nine of 15 scales/items (p<0.01) relative to the general population. Fatigue, loss of appetite, and impaired sense of well-being were the most troublesome symptoms on the ESAS, measured to 4.4(+/-2.8)/5.3(+/-2.3), 4.4(+/-3.2)/5.9(+/-2.7), and 4.0(+/-2.9)/4.6(+/-2.7) (mean+/-SD) at baseline and 8 weeks before death, respectively. Forty-four of the 51 (86%) initial consultations and 107 (58%) of the 185 follow-ups (124 clinical and 61 phone-calls) resulted in palliative care interventions, most frequently changes in opioid or laxative medication and dietary advice.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer develop several distressing symptoms. ESAS was useful for assessment of symptom prevalence and intensity and is a clinically adequate method for symptom control. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for the best palliation of symptoms at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pain control for intra-abdominal cancer

This article summarizes percutaneous and surgical methods for performing celiac plexus neurolysis and focuses on the technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Published literature concerning endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis is reviewed, indications are proposed, and opinions are offered concerning potential future applications and investigational needs as they apply to this technique.

Low morphine doses in opioid-naive cancer patients with pain

Cancer pain can be managed in most patients through the use of the analgesic ladder proposed by the World Health Organization. Recent studies have proposed to skip the second "rung" of the ladder by using a so-called "strong" opioid for moderate pain. However, usual doses of strong opioids commonly prescribed for the third rung of the analgesic ladder may pose several problems in terms of tolerability in opioid-naive patients. The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of very low doses of morphine in advanced cancer patients no longer responsive to nonopioid analgesics. A sample of 110 consecutive opioid-naive patients with moderate-to-severe pain were given oral morphine at a starting dose of 15 mg/day (10 mg in those older than 70 years). Doses were then titrated according to the clinical situation. Pain intensity, morphine doses, symptom intensity, quality of life, and the requirement for dose escalation were monitored for a period of 4 weeks. The treatment was effective and well tolerated by most patients, who were able to maintain relatively low doses for the subsequent weeks (mean dose 45 mg at Week 4). Only 12 patients dropped out due to poor response or other reasons. The use of very low doses of morphine proved to be a reliable method in titrating opioid-naive advanced cancer patients who were also able to maintain their dose, in a 4-week period, below the dose level commonly used when prescribing strong opioids.

Clinical aspects and treatment of pain in children and adolescents with cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical aspects and the treatment of mild to severe pain in Brazilian children and adolescents with cancer. We evaluated the importance of classifying patients according to the phase of cancer treatment (diagnosis, treatment, recurrence, and end-of-life palliative care) and the opioid-related side effects.

METHODS

An institutional prospective study of 184 episodes of pain in children and adolescents with cancer was conducted. Pain was classified according to its cause, physiopathology and intensity. Treatment was based on the WHO guidelines for cancer pain relief.

RESULTS

Pain scales were completed by 77% of the patients. Numerical scales were used by 49% of them. Morphine was given in 111 episodes for 2,758 patient days. Morphine doses had to be escalated when it was given to patients during end-of-life palliative care. Opioids were well tolerated with no severe side effects. Psychological dependence on morphine was found in 2% (2/111) of the cases. Pain control was satisfactory in 97% of the episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The WHO guidelines for cancer pain relief were effective in controlling pain in children and adolescents with cancer. Despite their low socioeconomic level, patients were able to quantify their pain using rating scales.

Pancreatic cancer pain and its correlation with changes in tumor vasculature, macrophage infiltration, neuronal innervation, body weight and disease progression

To begin to understand the relationship between disease progression and pain in pancreatic cancer, transgenic mice that develop pancreatic cancer due to the expression of the simian virus 40 large T antigen under control of the rat elastase-1 promoter were examined. In these mice precancerous cellular changes were evident at 6 weeks and these included an increase in: microvascular density, macrophages that express nerve growth factor and the density of sensory and sympathetic fibers that innervate the pancreas, with all of these changes increasing with tumor growth. In somatic tissue such as skin, the above changes would be accompanied by significant pain; however, in mice with pancreatic cancer, changes in pain-related behaviors, such as morphine-reversible severe hunching and vocalization only became evident at 16 weeks of age, by which time the pancreatic cancer was highly advanced. These data suggest that in mice as well as humans, there is a stereotypic set of pathological changes that occur as pancreatic cancer develops, and while weight loss generally tracks disease progression, there is a significant lag between disease progression and behaviors indicative of pancreatic cancer pain. Defining the mechanisms that mask this pain in early and mid-stage disease and drive the pain in late-stage disease may aid in earlier diagnosis, survival, and increased quality of life of patients with pancreatic cancer.

The role of opioids in cancer pain

Columba Quigley, as a specialist in palliative medicine, works in a hospital based support team. She also works with a community based palliative care team and in a hospice, where patients are admitted for terminal care, respite, and control of symptoms. Pain occurs often in patients with cancer, particularly those with advanced disease. In addition, pain is one of the most feared symptoms in people with a diagnosis of cancer. Using analgesics (particularly opioids) appropriately effectively controls cancer pain in most patients

A validation study of a pain classification system for advanced cancer patients using content experts: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain

The purpose of this study was to gather construct validity evidence for a pain classification system for advanced cancer patients using content experts. Two expert panels, representing regional (Panel A, n = 18) and national/international (Panel B, n = 52) palliative medicine and pain specialists, were purposefully selected to participate in a modified Delphi survey technique, to evaluate an existing pain classification system, the Revised Edmonton Staging System (rESS). Each panel participated in two survey rounds, with response rates of 67% (Panel A, Round 1), 39% (Panel A, Round 2), 56% (Panel B, Round 1) and 64% (Panel B, Round 2). The rESS consists of five features: mechanism of pain, incidental pain, psychological distress, addictive behavior and cognitive function. Most participants either agreed or strongly agreed with including the five existing rESS features in a pain classification system, ranging from 67% (Panel A, cognitive function) to 100% (Panel B, mechanism of pain). Most participants suggested keeping the current definitions for these features, with some revisions. Based on participant feedback, definitions for incidental pain, psychological distress, addictive behavior and cognitive function were revised, including the development of guidelines for use. To reflect its intended use as a classification system, the name of the instrument was changed to the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP).

Einsatz der WHO-Leitlinien für die Tumorschmerztherapie vor Zuweisung in eine Schmerzklinik

In 1986 the World Health Organization (WHO) released guidelines for cancer pain relief. Since then, several controlled studies on effectiveness and practicability of these guidelines have been published. Various authors described inadequate use of these guidelines. We analysed, whether the pain medication of 160 cancer patients referred to the anesthesiological pain clinic at the university hospital of Vienna corresponded to the WHO guidelines or not. Adequacy of pain treatment was assessed using the pain management index (PMI). Multiple criteria were chosen to assess the conformity of the treatment with the guidelines. Furthermore we studied the effect of a strict use of the WHO guidelines in these patients. The average pain intensity of the referred patients was 75 mm (VAS). Negative PMI scores, indicating inadequate pain therapy, were found in 39 % of cases. A violation of the rules was found in 38% of the therapy schedules. Pain medication was then modified by switching to fixed time intervals, escalation of the steps of the WHO ladder, increasing the dosage or treating neuropathic pain with adjuvant drugs. Two weeks later the average pain score of the patients was reduced to 27 mm (VAS). At that time 72% of the patients quoted an adequate reduction of pain. Inadequate knowledge or disregard of the WHO guidelines for cancer pain relief are common and result in unnecessary and prolonged suffering in these patients.

Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Morphine Titration in Patients with Persisting Exacerbation of Cancer Pain

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer pain with initially adequate analgesia under oral sustained-release opioid medication may suffer from persisting pain exacerbations. Sometimes even fast help is needed and then optimally performed by intravenous application (IVA) of immediate-release (IR) opioids. This IVA, however, may only be performed by physicians in Germany.

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to find out if subcutaneous application of IR-opioids might be an adequate alternative to IVA in persisting pain exacerbations of patients with cancer pain because this could be performed by the nursing staff in Germany as well.

DESIGN

An open randomized controlled trial was used to compare intravenous versus subcutaneous morphine titration in persisting pain exacerbations in patients with cancer pain.

SETTING/SUBJECTS

Thirty-nine patients with cancer (21 intravenously, 18 subcutaneously) of the pain management department of the university hospital of Cologne, Germany were included into the study.

MEASUREMENTS

Calculated from preexisting analgesic medication boli of morphine were given every 5 minutes (intravenously) or 30 minutes (subcutaneously) up to adequate analgesia or intolerable side effects. Pain intensity, nausea, sedation, and some vital parameters were documented before the start, after each application and at the end of titration.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were pretreated with oral opioids, 4 patients with nonopioid analgesics. Six patients stopped titration because of intolerable side effects (sedation, vomiting). Thirty patients (77%) reported at least sufficient pain reduction, 3 patients were free of pain (intravenously). Mean pain intensity decreased on a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100) from 83 to 32 (intravenously) and from 68 to 42 (subcutaneously). Morphine doses ranged from 4 mg to 32 mg (intravenously; mean, 18.5 +/- 9.2 mg) and from 10 mg to 200 mg (subcutaneously mean, 57.9 +/- 59.6 mg). Mean time up to adequate analgesia was 53 (intravenously) 77 min (subcutaneously), respectively. There was no change in vital parameters but an increase of sedation in both groups. The adaptation of the continuous analgesic medication resulted in a stable and lasting pain relief after 4 days in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous and subcutaneous-morphine titration are adequate to antagonize persisting pain exacerbations in cancer pain patients quickly and to adapt the continuous opioid analgesic medication.

Clinical applications of endoscopic ultrasound to oncology

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a useful imaging modality in patients with certain gastrointestinal malignancies as well as lung cancer. In many cases, EUS has been shown to have superior staging accuracy compared with other imaging techniques such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. This article will review the role of EUS in diagnosing and staging esophageal, rectal, pancreatic and lung cancers as well as subepithelial lesions. Newer therapeutic applications of EUS, namely endoscopic mucosal resection for removal of localized lesions as well as celiac plexus neurolysis for pain control, will also be discussed.

Strong opioids in pediatric palliative medicine

The management of pain in the palliative care of children is somewhat different from that in adults. It also differs in approach from the management of other types of acute and chronic pain in childhood. Whereas once opioids were thought to be highly dangerous drugs, unsuitable for use in children, they have now taken their place as the mainstay for provision of good analgesia to manage moderate-to-severe pain in both malignant and non-malignant life-limiting conditions. There are relatively little clinical or laboratory data regarding opioids specifically in children. However, much of what has been published regarding the management of pain in palliative medicine in adults can be extrapolated. On saying that, early research in children does suggest some significant differences in opioid pharmacokinetics, particularly with respect to morphine clearance, which seems to be faster in adults. Thus, the use of opioids in pediatric palliative care presents some unique challenges. Confident and rational use of opioids by pediatricians, illustrated by the WHO guidelines, is essential for the adequate management of pain complicating the palliative phase in children with life-limiting conditions.