Expanded indication criteria of living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma at one large-volume center

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Japanese experience

Treatment strategies against hepatocellular carcinoma have progressed remarkably over the past decade. In Asia, evidence-based guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma have evolved, including the option of liver transplantation. Due to severe organ shortage, however, living donor liver transplantation has become mainstream in Japan. Unlike deceased donor transplantation, living donor transplantation is not limited by the restrictions imposed by the nationwide allocation system. The decision for transplantation often depends on institutional or case-by-case considerations, balancing the will of the donor, the operative risk, and the overall survival benefit for the recipient. Cumulative data from the national multicenter registry analysis as well as individual center experience suggest that expansion of the Milan criteria is warranted.

Treatment algorithm for intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma: Korea

The practice guideline for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea was revised in 2009. It was based on clinical evidence. The treatment algorithm was divided into curative and noncurative treatments. According to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging, the curative treatment group included early stage HCC (BCLC-A), and the noncurative treatment group consisted of intermediate and advanced stages of HCC (BCLC-B, C). The intermediate stage of HCC stands for noncurative disease, and therefore surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation are not considered as primary treatment modalities. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) forms the backbone of the treatment for intermediate stage HCC with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. Patients in whom complete necrosis is not achieved or early recurrence after TACE develops should receive individualized treatments such as systemic treatment or combined radiation therapy (RT). Liver transplantation (LT) can be carried out for intermediate stage HCCs. However, the long-term survival rate after LT for intermediate stage HCCs is inferior to that of early stage HCCs because intermediate stage HCCs exceed the Milan criteria. In patients with Child-Pugh C liver function, LT would be better than TACE in terms of survival gain if the tumor burden is acceptable by expert opinion standards. The treatment algorithm becomes very complicated when it comes to advanced stage HCC. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antiproliferative properties, has been shown to prolong the median overall survival and the median time to radiological progression compared to placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and has become the current standard of care for patients with advanced-stage tumors not suitable for surgical or locoregional therapies. RT is in the process of becoming a modality with a high efficacy and minimum side effects for HCC treatment, with recent improvements in equipment as well as radiation methods. However, to discover whether RT is really beneficial in the treatment of large-sized intermediate and advanced stage HCC, prospective RCTs should be carried out.

Combination of biological and morphological parameters for the selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma waiting for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

In the last several years, there has been no agreement on how to possibly expand the Milan criteria (MC) in the selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for listing for liver transplant (LT). The aim of the study is to evaluate morphological and biological tumor parameters to identify new expanded criteria for the selection of patients with HCC as candidates for LT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 158 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent LT.

RESULTS

Twelve (7.6%) recurrences were observed. At multivariate analysis, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >400 ng/mL (odds ratio [OR] 8.4, p<0.01) and total tumor diameter (TTD) >8 cm (OR 7.4, p=0.01) were the strongest predictors for recurrence. AFP-TTD criteria resulted in a low five-yr recurrence rate (4.9%) and an increased number of LT compared with the MC (22.2% increase). The five-yr disease-free survival rate was 74.4% in AFP-TTD criteria in patients, with a higher effectiveness in stratifying the cohort with respect to the MC.

CONCLUSIONS

Both AFP and TTD are good independent predictors of HCC recurrence. Their combination appears to obtain a better selection of candidates for LT without worsening patient survival and recurrence rates. This approach allows for an increase in the number of potentially transplantable patients.

Current status of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing worldwide. A multi-disciplinary approach is required for its management. Screening high-risk patients allows for earlier diagnosis and the use of potentially curative therapies. Current recommendations for HCC screening for patients with cirrhosis are an abdominal ultrasound and serum alpha fetoprotein level every 6 to 12 months. Treatment choice depends on tumor stage, liver function and the patient's overall functional status. Curative therapies include surgical resection, liver transplantation (LT), transarterial chemoembolization, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Surgical resection, either primary resection or LT, is the treatment most likely to result in cure of HCC. Which option to pursue is based on multiple factors. LT has the potential benefit of treating both HCC and the underlying cirrhosis; however, long wait times incur the risk of tumor progression. Firm recommendations regarding the role of living donor LT for HCC are not yet possible because of conflicting data. HCC recurrence after LT is 8-11% and several adjuvant therapies have been investigated to reduce this. Bridging therapy and tumor downsizing are techniques that also may be considered to deal with long waiting periods and qualification for LT, respectively. If neither LT nor primary resection is possible, loco-regional therapies such as RFA and TACE should be considered. Systemic chemotherapies have proved disappointing for the treatment of HCC; however, newer targeted therapies such as sorafenib and cetuximab have provided new hope for the future.

Super-selection of a subgroup of hepatocellular carcinoma patients at minimal risk of recurrence for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

A majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing liver transplantation (LT) meet the Milan criteria, but these are still regarded as the narrowest criteria for transplantation. Prognostic analysis of incidentally detected HCC after LT suggests that a subgroup of HCC patients is at very low risk of recurrence. To determine the criteria defining this super-selection group, we retrospectively analyzed survival data of 593 adult living-donor LT recipients with HCC in the explanted liver

DISCUSSION

Tumor features of incidental HCC in 38 patients not showing recurrence were analyzed. Of these patients, 34 (89.5%) each had ≤2 tumors and tumors ≤2.0 cm in size. Applying these criteria to 555 patients with pretransplant known HCC (pkHCC) allowed us to identify 79 patients with untreated pkHCCs ≤2.0 cm in size. To date, only two of these patients have shown recurrence, making the conditions for super-selection the presence of tumors ≤2.0 cm in size, ≤2 tumors, alpha-fetoprotein ≤200 ng/mL, and no pretransplant treatment. In 87 patients satisfying these criteria, the 10-year recurrence and survival rates were 1.3% and 92.1%, respectively. After excluding patients meeting these criteria, the 5-year recurrence rates in patients satisfying the Milan, University of California at San Francisco, and Asan criteria were increased by 2.9-4.0%. In conclusion, this super-selection or super-Milan category may be used for validation assessment of various indication criteria and for the development of cost-effective post-transplantation HCC surveillance protocols. Further studies should be followed for deceased-donor LT and patients who have undergone pretransplant treatment.

Intention-to-treat analysis of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: living versus deceased donor transplantation

For patients who have cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) reduces waiting time and dropout rates. We performed a comparative intention-to-treat analysis of recurrence rates and survival outcomes after LDLT and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in HCC patients. Our study included 183 consecutive patients with HCC who were listed for liver transplantation over a 9-year period at our institution. Tumor recurrence was the primary endpoint. At listing, patient and tumor characteristics were comparable in the two groups (LDLT, n = 36; DDLT, n = 147). Twenty-seven (18.4%) patients dropped out, all from the DDLT waiting list, mainly due to tumor progression (19/27 [70%] patients). The mean waiting time was shorter in the LDLT group (2.6 months versus 7.9 months; P = 0.001). The recurrence rates in the two groups were similar (12.9% and 12.7%, P = 0.78), and there was a trend toward a longer time to recurrence after LDLT (38 ± 27 months versus 16 ± 13 months, P = 0.06). Tumors exceeding the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, tumor grade, and microvascular invasion were independent predictive factors for recurrence. On an intention-to-treat basis, the overall survival (OS) in the two groups was comparable. Patients beyond the Milan and UCSF criteria showed a trend toward worse outcomes with LDLT compared with DDLT (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

The recurrence and survival outcomes after LDLT and DDLT were comparable on an intent-to-treat analysis. Shorter waiting time preventing dropouts is an additional advantage with LDLT. LDLT for HCC patients beyond validated criteria should be proposed with caution.

Total tumor volume predicts recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation in patients beyond Milan or UCSF criteria

BACKGROUND

The aim of tumor-based selection criteria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is to prevent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients likely to experience recurrence and to maximize OLT opportunities for those with a high likelihood of cure.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to assess total tumor volume (TTV) as a selection criterion for OLT in patients with HCC beyond Milan or University of California San Francisco criteria.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent OLT for HCC between 2002 and 2008. TTV was calculated as the sum of the volumes of all tumors on pretransplant imaging before any therapy [(4/3)πr(3), where r is the maximum radius of each HCC]. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with recurrence of HCC.

RESULTS

107 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range, 11.8-32.5), during which 13 patients (12.1%) experienced recurrence of HCC. Twenty-nine patients (27.1%) had HCC beyond the Milan criteria. A TTV cutoff value of 33.5 cm(3) was chosen on the basis of the risk of recurrence by using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Patients beyond the Milan criteria with TTV <33.5 experienced less recurrence (13.3% vs 42.8%; P < .001) and higher survival (13.3% vs 57.1%; P = .006) than those who were beyond the Milan criteria with TTV ≥33.5. Similarly, TTV predicted HCC recurrence and survival in those beyond the UCSF criteria.

CONCLUSION

TTV is useful in identifying patients at risk of tumor recurrence and poor survival among those with tumor burden beyond traditional criteria, and it may improve the selection of OLT candidates.

Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma

Surgery is the most important therapeutic approach for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We have reviewed patients' survival after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in 17 series since 2000, each including more than 100 patients. Median survival rates were 80% (range 63-97%) at 1 year, 70% (34-78%) at 3 years and 50% (17-69%) at 5 years. Such wide ranges of survival rates are attributed mainly to differences in the hepatocellular carcinoma stage among studies, but the survival rate is obviously much better for early hepatocellular carcinomas. Today, liver resection is an established treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma owing to minimal surgical mortality and improved survival. Liver transplantation is one of the best treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who meet the selection criteria. Further studies are needed to establish suitable criteria for transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. For patients who are not candidates for liver resection or transplantation, percutaneous ablation is the best treatment option. However, no randomized controlled clinical trial has compared the results of ablation with those of surgical therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, and none of the ablation techniques have been shown to offer a definitive survival advantage. A treatment algorithm based on published evidence is now available, which helps us to select the most suitable therapeutic option for individual patients, depending on tumor characteristics and liver functional reserve. This review paper summarizes the current status of the surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation

A perception that living donor liver transplantation can be accomplished with an acceptable donor complication rate and recipient survival rate has led to the acceptance of living donor liver transplantation as a viable alternative to decreased deceased donor transplantation. Careful candidate evaluation and selection has been crucial to the success of this procedure. Advancements in the understanding of the lobar nature of the liver and of liver regeneration have advanced the surgical technique. Initial attempts at adult-to-adult donation utilized the left hepatic lobe, but now have evolved into use of the right hepatic lobe. Size matching is very important to successful graft function in the recipient. There is great concern regarding morbidity and mortality in donors. Biliary complications and infections continue to be among the most highly reported complications, although rates vary among centers and countries. Reports of single center complications have ranged from 9% to 67%. A survey of centers in the United States in 2003 reported complications of 10%. A series from our institution reported complications arising in 13 (33%) of 39 patients. A review focused on documenting donor deaths found 33 living liver donor deaths worldwide. The much publicized immediate postoperative mishap of 2002 that resulted in a donor’s death resulted in a drop in the utilization of living donor liver transplantation in the United States, from which this procedure has never fully recovered. The future development and expansion of living donor liver transplantation depends on open communication regarding donor complications and deaths. Close immediate postoperative monitoring and meticulous management will remain an essential aspect in limiting donor complications and deaths.

Does living donation have advantages over deceased donation in liver transplantation?

Liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease. Living donor LT (LDLT) has developed as an alternative to deceased donor LT (DDLT) in order to overcome the critical shortage of deceased organ donations, particularly in Asia. LDLT offers several advantages over DDLT. The major advantage of LDLT is the reduction in waiting time mortality. Especially among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), LDLT can shorten the waiting time and lower the dropout rate. The Hong Kong group reported that median waiting time was significantly shorter for LDLT than for DDLT. Intention-to-treat survival rates of HCC patients with voluntary live donors were significantly higher than those of patients without voluntary live donors. In contrast, a multicenter adult-to-adult LDLT retrospective cohort study reported that LDLT recipients displayed a significantly higher rate of HCC recurrence than DDLT recipients, although LDLT recipients had shorter waiting times than DDLT recipients. The advantage of LDLT involves the more liberal criteria for HCC compared with those for DDLT. Various preoperative interventions including nutritional treatment can also be planned for both the donor and recipient in LDLT. Conversely, LDLT has marked unfavorable characteristics in terms of donor risks. Donor morbidity is not infrequent and the donor mortality rate is estimated at around 0.1-0.3%. In conclusion, living donation is not necessarily advantageous over deceased donation in LT. Taking the advantages and disadvantages of each option into consideration, LDLT and DDLT should both be used to facilitate effective LT for patients requiring transplant.

Living donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The widening gap between the growing number of liver transplant candidates and the supply of deceased donor organs became a strong motivation for the development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). LDLT has gone through its developmental phase and become an established life-saving procedure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the challenging nature of the technique of LDLT, there have been continuous innovations. A better understanding of complex surgical anatomy and physiologic differences of partial hepatic allografts has helped to avoid graft congestion, small-for-size syndrome, or graft hypoperfusion from portal flow steal. LDLT for patients with high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score can achieve comparable results with deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Size limitation of partial grafts can be overcome with dual grafts. The extended application of LDLT for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria seems feasible but at the cost of slightly compromised survival. More information has become available for prospective donors about the consequences of living liver donation in terms of psychosocial impact.

SUMMARY

Although LDLT is still evolving, it has become the most effective alternative to DDLT. Proven or potential benefit of LDLT include the superior quality of the allograft despite the smaller size, selection of proper timing for transplantation and a reduced waiting time, which prevents waiting list mortality.

[Liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common malignancy, with a new incidence of more than 11,000 cases per year and the second most common cause of malignancy-related death in Korean males. In Korea, more than 80% of all HCCs have developed from hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhotic livers. Liver transplantation (LT) is the only treatment that offers a chance of cure for HCC and the underlying liver cirrhosis simultaneously, but the availability of liver grafts and the aggressiveness of tumor recurrence are critical limiting factors of LT for HCC patients. The serious shortage of deceased-donors on strong demand for LT leads to the development of living-donor LT (LDLT) as a practical alternative replacing deceased-donor LT. Considering that HCC recurrence is the most common cause of posttransplant patient death, recipient candidates should be prudently selected through objectively established criteria. Uniquely, some Asian major LDLT centers challenged the Milan criteria, accepting a much higher number of HCC nodules instead of tumor size expansion. The eligibility criteria of LDLT for HCC are likely to be expanded more than before, but it still requires further qualified risk-benefit analyses. The development of new effective treatment modalities for HCC recurrence will reasonably expand the selection criteria further wide without the expense of recurrence rate. This article is mainly focused on the role of LT for HCC and discussed on the validity of currently available indication criteria.

Current controversies surrounding liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has progressed rapidly over the last decade from a futile therapy to the first choice therapy for suitable patients. Excellent outcomes of LT for HCC can be largely attributed to the use of the Milan Criteria, which have restricted LT to patients with early stage tumors. These criteria may be conservative, and it is likely that a subset of patients with tumors beyond these criteria can have acceptable outcomes. However, there is currently insufficient data to accept more liberal criteria as a standard of care, and a higher quality evidence base must be achieved to prevent poor utilization of valuable donor liver resources. In the future, it is probable that more sophisticated selection criteria will emerge incorporating aspects of tumor biology beyond tumor size and number. Dropout from the waiting list due to tumor progression remains a clinical challenge particularly in regions with prolonged waiting times. Priority allocation using HCC MELD points is a practical and transparent solution that has successfully reduced waitlist dropout for HCC patients. Further refinements of the HCC MELD point system are required to ensure equity of access to LT for non-HCC patients and prioritization of HCC patients with the highest risk of dropout. Improving the evidence base for pre-LT locoregional therapy to prevent waitlist dropout is an urgent and difficult challenge for the LT community. In the interim transplant clinicians must restrict the use of these therapies to those patients who are most likely to benefit from them.

Treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma: Towards personalized therapy

In recent years, the wide implementation of surveillance programs has led to diagnose HCC at earlier stages, when curative options can be applied. In order to obtain the best results, treatment indication should take into account the estimation of baseline life expectancy. Patients at an early stage are those with single HCC or up to three nodules <3 cm with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A-B) and no cancer related symptoms. These patients should be evaluated for any of the therapies that can offer complete responses with potential long-term cure, as reflected by a 5 years survival superior to 50-70%. These include surgical resection, liver transplantation and ablation. We briefly reviewed therapeutic management for early HCC, taking into account that any recommendation should be delivered in the clinical setting and based on an individualised evaluation of each patient.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: Report of Consensus Meeting in the 45th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society of Hepatology (2009)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is responsible for approximately 600 000-700 000 deaths worldwide. It is highly prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa, and is increasing in Western countries. The evidence-based guideline for HCC in Japan was published in 2005 and revised in 2009. Apart from this guideline, a consensus-based practice manual proposed by the HCC expert panel of the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH), which reflects widely accepted daily practice in Japan, was published in 2007. At the occasion of the 45th Annual meeting of the JSH in Kobe 4-5 June 2009, a consensus meeting of HCC was held. Consensus statements were createdbased on 67% agreement of 200 expert members.This article describes the up-to-date consensus statements which largely reflect the real world HCC practice in Japan. We believe readers of this article will gain the newest knowledge and deep insight on the management of HCC proposed by consensus of the HCC expert members of JSH.

Sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Sorafenib is the only drug that has shown a survival benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in randomized Phase 3 trials. The efficacy and safety of sorafenib in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation, however, has not been determined.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 13 patients who were treated with sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

RESULTS

The median time to recurrence from liver transplantation was 12.3 months (95% confidence interval: 8.5-16.1 months). Six of 10 evaluable patients showed stable disease, which was the best response and the median duration of stabilization was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval: 1.6-6.2 months). At a median follow-up duration of 3.7 months (range: 0.3-10.9 months) in surviving patients, the median time to progression and the median overall survival from commencement of sorafenib were 2.9 months (95% confidence interval: 0.0-6.8 months) and 5.4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.7-7.0 months), respectively. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in one patient, which was the only high-grade hematologic toxicity observed. Grade 3 hand-foot skin reactions were observed in three patients. Adverse events could be managed with dose adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that sorafenib may be a feasible treatment option regarding its efficacy and safety for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

The challenges of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide and liver transplantation (LT) has potentials to improve survival for patients with HCC. However, expansion of indications beyond Milan Criteria (MC) and use of bridging/downstaging procedures to convert intermediate-advanced stages of HCC within MC limits are counterbalanced by graft shortage and increasing use of marginal donors, partially limited by the use of donor-division protocols applied to the cadaveric and living-donor settings. Several challenges in technique, indications, pre-LT treatments and prioritization policies of patients on the waiting list have to be precised through prospective investigations that have to include individualization of prognosis, biological variables and pathology surrogates as stratification criteria. Also, liver resection has to be rejuvenated in the general algorithm of HCC treatment in the light of salvage transplantation strategies, while benefit of LT for HCC should be determined through newly designed composite scores that are able to capture both efficiency and equity endpoints. Innovative treatments such as radioembolization for HCC associated with portal vein thrombosis and molecular targeted compounds are likely to influence future strategies. Accepting this challenge has been part of the history of LT and will endure so also for the future.

Exchange living donor liver transplantation to overcome ABO incompatibility in adult patients

ABO incompatibility is the most common cause of donor rejection during the initial screening of adult patients with end-stage liver disease for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A paired donor exchange program was initiated to cope with this problem without ABO-incompatible LDLT. We present our results from the first 6 years of this exchange adult LDLT program. Between July 2003 and June 2009, 1351 adult LDLT procedures, including 16 donor exchanges and 7 ABO-incompatible LDLT procedures, were performed at our institution. Initial donor-recipient ABO incompatibilities included 6 A to B incompatibilities, 6 B to A incompatibilities, 1 A to O incompatibility, 1 A+O (dual graft) to B incompatibility, 1 O to AB incompatibility, and 1 O to A incompatibility. Fourteen matches (87.5%) were ABO-incompatible, but 2 (12.5%) were initially ABO-compatible. All ABO-incompatible donors were directly related to their recipients, but 2 compatible donors were each undirected and unrelated directed. After donor reassignment through paired exchange (n = 7) or domino pairing (n = 1), the donor-recipient ABO status changed to A to A in 6, B to B in 6, O to O in 1, A to AB in 1, A+O to A in 1, and O to B in 1, and this made all matches ABO-identical (n = 13) or ABO-compatible (n = 3). Two pairs of LDLT operations were performed simultaneously on an elective basis in 12 and on an emergency basis in 4. All donors recovered uneventfully. Fifteen of the 16 recipients survived, but 1 died after 54 days. In conclusion, an exchange donor program for adult LDLT appears to be a feasible modality for overcoming donor-recipient ABO incompatibility.

[Practice guidelines for management of hepatocellular carcinoma 2009]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cancer in Korea, typically has a poor prognosis, and constitutes the majority of primary hepatic malignancies. It is the number one cause of death among people in their 50s in Korea. The five-year survival rate of liver cancer is poor; at 18.9%. Efforts to increase the survival rate through early diagnosis of HCC and optimal treatments are keenly needed. Western guideline for the management of HCC were developed, but these guidelines are somewhat unsuitable for Korean patients. Thus, the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (KLCSG) and the National Cancer Center (NCC), Korea jointly produced the Clinical Practice Guidelines for HCC for the first time in Korea in 2003. Owing to medical advances over the following six years, diagnosis and treatment of HCC has changed considerably. As more national and foreign data are accumulated, KLCSG and NCC, Korea recently revised the Clinical Practice Guidelines for HCC. Forty or more specialists in the field of hepatology, general surgery, radiology and radiation oncology participated, and meticulously reviewed national and foreign papers, and collected opinions through advisory committee conferences. These multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines summarized diagnosis, surgical resection, liver transplantation, local treatments, transarterial chemoembolization, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, preemptive antiviral treatments, and response evaluation of HCC. These Korean guidelines are expected to be useful for clinical management of and research on HCC.

Living-donor liver transplantation in adults

INTRODUCTION

The technique of paediatric living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become standardized. In adults, however, there is scope for innovation. Unlike cadaveric whole-size liver transplantation and paediatric LDLT, size matching between the liver graft and the recipient by body weight has been a major challenge in adult LDLT because it is important to provide an adequate graft mass to the recipient while leaving a sufficient mass of remnant liver in the donor to ensure donor safety.

GROWING POINTS

In adult LDLT, liver grafts have been selected to meet graft-recipient size-matching requirements. In 1996, the Hong Kong group pioneered the use of the right-lobe grafts vein to overcome the volume insufficiency often encountered with the left-lobe liver grafts. Subsequently, the Asan group introduced modified right-lobe grafting with interposition vein grafts to drain the venous outflow of the anterior sector, thus increasing the functioning hepatocyte mass, and this group initiated dual left-lobe liver grafts to overcome both donor risk and volume insufficiency.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROVERSY

Although the surgical procedures for both donors and recipients are more complex for adult LDLT than for whole-organ deceased donor transplantation, the outcomes in large-volume centers are now similar. Accordingly, the indications for adult LDLT are continually being expanded.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

In performing these procedures, it is crucial to minimize the risks of morbidity and mortality to the healthy live donor. This review focuses on the current technical development and discusses the ethical issues of adult LDLT.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: review of current treatment with a focus on targeted molecular therapies

The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a challenge, with 1- and 3-year survival rates of 20% and 5%, respectively, and a median survival of 8 months. However, a better understanding of the pathogenesis of HCC, and advances in targeted molecular therapies provide physicians treating this disease with new hope. The treatment of HCC is multidisciplinary, requiring surgeons, hepatologists, interventional radiologists and oncologists. Thus, there is enormous potential to combine various treatment modalities to improve survival for patients. This review will describe what is currently known about the molecular pathogenesis of HCC, explore current and future treatments based on these pathways, and describe how these new therapies fit into existing approaches to HCC treatment.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Increased recurrence but improved survival

In regions with a limited deceased donor pool, living donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) has become an important treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis. Studies have shown higher recurrence rates of HCC after LDALT in comparison with deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of our study was to examine the outcome results and recurrence rates for patients with HCC who underwent LDALT at our center. During an 8-year period, 139 patients underwent LDALT, of whom 28 (20.1%) had HCC in their explanted livers. The median follow-up was 40.8 months. The mean explant tumor size was 3.3 +/- 1.2, and the mean number of tumors was 1.5 +/- 0.8. Twenty-one patients (75%) had tumors within the Milan criteria, 5 patients had tumors outside the Milan criteria but within the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, and 2 patients were beyond the UCSF criteria. The overall 1- and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 96% and 81%, respectively. Survival following LDALT was significantly better than survival following DDLT for HCC during the same time period (P = 0.02). Eight patients (28.6%) developed tumor recurrence. Poor differentiation of tumor cells was the most significant determinant of recurrence. Despite high recurrence rates of HCC following LDALT, overall 5-year survival appears to be excellent.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the commonest primary malignancy of the liver. It usually occurs in the setting of chronic liver disease and has a poor prognosis if untreated. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a suitable therapeutic option for early, unresectable HCC particularly in the setting of chronic liver disease. Following on from disappointing initial results, the seminal study by Mazzaferro et al in 1996 established OLT as a viable treatment for HCC. In this study, the “Milan criteria” were applied achieving a 4-year survival rate similar to OLT for benign disease. Since then various groups have attempted to expand these criteria whilst maintaining long term survival rates. The technique of living donor liver transplantation has evolved over the past decade, particularly in Asia, and published outcome data is comparable to that of OLT. This article will review the evidence, indications, and the future direction of liver transplantation for liver cancer.

Liver transplantation for HCC: its role: Eastern and Western perspectives

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only treatment that offers a chance of cure for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the underlying liver cirrhosis simultaneously, but the availability of liver grafts and the aggressiveness of tumor recurrence are critical limiting factors of LT for patients with HCC. In most Asian countries, the serious shortage of deceased donors and the strong demand for LT has lead to the development of living-donor LT (LDLT) as a practical alternative replacing deceased-donor LT (DDLT). Grafts in Western countries are issued from DDLT and graft allocations are under the responsibilities of state agencies which apply strict rules based on the MELD (model for end-stage liver disease) score. Considering that HCC recurrence is the most common cause of post-transplant patient death, recipient candidates should be prudently selected through objectively established criteria. Points in addition to the MELD score can be allotted to patients with HCC providing that the HCC remains within the Milan criteria. The increasing number of LT candidates with HCC results in increasing waiting periods, which necessitate the consideration of pretransplant treatment of HCC, including partial liver resection. Both specific Western units and some Asian major LDLT centers have challenged the Milan criteria. The eligibility criteria of both DDLT and LDLT for HCC are likely to be expanded more than before, but this still requires further qualified risk-benefit analyses. The development of new effective treatment modalities before LT and for HCC recurrence might expand the selection criteria further without incurring an increased recurrence rate.

Significance of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in selection criteria for living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) levels reportedly correlate with histological features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We examined serum DCP as a predictor of HCC recurrence in 144 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis revealed superiority of DCP and AFP over preoperative tumor size or number for predicting recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size >5 cm, > or =11 nodules, and DCP >400 mAU/mL as significant independent risk factors for recurrence. Incidence of microvascular invasion (62% vs. 27%, p = 0.0003) and poor differentiation (38% vs. 16%, p = 0.0087) were significantly higher for patients with DCP >400 mAU/mL than for patients with DCP < or =400 mAU/mL. In ROC analysis for patients with < or =10 nodules all < or =5 cm to predict recurrence, area under the curve was much higher for DCP than for AFP (0.84 vs. 0.69). Kyoto criteria were thus defined as < or =10 nodules all < or =5 cm, and DCP < or =400 mAU/mL. The 5-year recurrence rate for 28 patients beyond-Milan but within-Kyoto criteria was as excellent as that for 78 patients within-Milan criteria (3% vs. 7%). The preoperative DCP level offers additional information regarding histological features, and thus can greatly improve patient selection criteria when used with tumor bulk information.

Liver transplantation

Liver transplantation has become a lifesaving procedure for patients who have chronic end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure. The satisfactory outcome of liver transplantation has led to insufficient supplies of deceased donor organs, particularly in East Asia. Hence, East Asian surgeons are concentrating on developing and performing living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This review article describes an update on the present status of liver transplantation, mainly in adults, and highlights some recent developments on indications for transplantation, patient selection, donor and recipient operation between LDLT and deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT), immunosuppression, and long-term management of liver transplant recipients. Currently, the same indication criteria that exist for DDLT are applied to LDLT, with technical refinements for LDLT. In highly experienced centers, LDLT for high-scoring (>30 points) Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) patients and acute-on-chronic liver-failure patients yields comparably good outcomes to DDLT, because timely liver transplantation with good-quality grafting is possible. With increasing numbers of liver transplantations and long-term survivors, specialized attention should be paid to complications that develop in the long term, such as chronic renal failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, bone or neurological complications, and development of de novo tumors, which are highly related to the immunosuppressive treatment.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Hong Kong experience

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the best treatment option for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the background of cirrhosis since this treatment modality can cure both diseases at once. Over the years, the applicability of OLT for HCC has evolved. In Asia, including Hong Kong, a shortage of deceased donor liver grafts is a universal problem having to be faced in all transplant centers. Living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) has therefore been developed to counteract organ shortage and the high prevalence of HCC. The application of LDLT for HCC is a complex process involving donor voluntarism, selection criteria for the recipient and justification with respect to long-term survival in comparison to the result of deceased donor liver transplant. This article reviews the authors' experience with OLT for HCC patients in Hong Kong, with emphasis on the applicability and outcome of LDLT for HCC. Donor voluntarism has a significant impact on the application of LDLT. "Fast-track" LDLT in the setting of recurrence following curative treatment carries a high risk of recurrence even though the tumor stage fulfills the standard criteria. Although the survival outcome may be worse following LDLT than DDLT for HCC, LDLT is still the main treatment option for patients with transplantable HCC in Hong Kong, and a reasonable survival outcome can be achieved in selected patients with extended indications. It is particularly true that LDLT provides the only hope for patients with advanced HCC under the constricting problem of organ shortage.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Korean experience

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of male cancer death in Korea, where the major etiology, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, is endemic. With a high incidence of unresectable HCCs and a low cadaveric organ donation rate, the number of adult living-donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) has increased rapidly, by tenfold, over the past 10 years, as an alternative to deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Asia, including Korea. Currently, HCC accounts for more than 40% of the indications for adult LDLT as the associated decompensation cirrhosis or unresectable HCC with 2.8% perioperative mortality at our institute. In determining eligibility for LDLT, the Milan criteria, which have a major aim of reducing the wastage of cadaveric liver grafts, still remain the gold standard. Our published results with 168 adult LDLTs show no difference from the results with DDLT for HCC that meets the Milan criteria. However, since a substantial proportion of adult LDLT patients not fulfilling the Milan criteria have been found to survive for longer than expected, and because a live donor organ is a private gift, most LDLT programs in Korea accept HCC patients beyond the Milan criteria, and the reported 3-year survival rates for such patients are approximately 63%. Our new proposal for expanded criteria (Asan criteria; tumor diameter <or=5 cm, number of lesions <or=6, no gross vascular invasion) in LDLT has focused on extending the number limits but keeping the maximum tumor size at 5 cm, because even modest expansion of tumor size limits beyond the Milan criteria adversely affected survival. The overall 5-year patient survival rates were 76.3 and only 18.9% within and beyond the Asan criteria, respectively; these criteria broaden the indications for patient selection and can more accurately identify patients who will benefit from LDLT than the conventional Milan criteria and the University of California at San Francisco criteria. In Asia, where the option for DDLT is minimal or negligible, LDLT with the modest expanded selection criteria will continue to provide a chance of long-term survival for some patients with advanced HCC.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Kyoto experience

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The results of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at Kyoto University were analyzed.

METHODS

Between February 1999 and December 2006, 136 patients with HCC underwent LDLT. Of these, 74 patients met the Milan criteria, while 62 patients did not. Treatment for HCC had been previously performed prior to LDLT for 101 patients (74%).

RESULTS

According to the results of multivariate analysis of risk factors for recurrence among preoperative tumor variables, we have defined new Kyoto criteria as <or=10 tumors all <or=5 cm in diameter and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) <or=400 mAU/ml. The 5-year recurrence rate was significantly lower for the 85 patients who met the Kyoto criteria than for the 45 patients who exceeded them (3 vs. 54%, p < 0.0001). Similarly, patients who met the Kyoto criteria showed a significantly better 5-year survival rate (87%) than those who did not (36%, p < 0.0001). Survival rates did not differ between pretreated and primary groups, and recurrence rates were similarly low when limited to patients who met the Kyoto criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed Kyoto criteria are expected to serve efficiently as expanded selection criteria for LDLT in patients with HCC. History of previous treatments did not affect outcomes after LDLT.

Targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. The major etiologies and risk factors for development of HCC are well defined and some steps of hepatocellular carcinogenesis have been elucidated. Despite these scientific advances and the implementation of measures for early detection of HCC in patients who are at risk of this disease, survival of patients has not improved greatly over the past three decades. This situation is partly due to the limited therapeutic options available. While surgery and percutaneous or transarterial interventions are effective for patients with limited or compensated underlying liver disease, more than 80% of patients present with multifocal HCC and/or advanced liver disease, or have comorbidities at the time of diagnosis. Treatment options for these patients have previously been limited to best supportive care. The effectiveness of targeted therapy with monoclonal antibodies or small-molecule kinase inhibitors has now been demonstrated for the treatment of different tumors. In 2007, the multitargeted kinase inhibitor, sorafenib, was found to prolong survival significantly for patients with advanced HCC. This Review discusses the mechanisms of targeted therapies and clinical studies that have investigated these therapies in patients with HCC. Perspectives for future developments are also provided.

Liberal selection criteria for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

To help increase the number of transplants available for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers, this single-centre retrospective study compared the safety and feasibility of new, more liberal, selection criteria—no more than five tumours, with the largest tumour no greater than 5 cm (5/5 criteria)—with classical criteria.

Methods

Data from operations performed in 1990–2005 were extracted from preoperative radiological findings and postoperative specimen analyses, and four groups were constructed: Paul Brousse, Milan, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and 5/5 criteria. A fifth group comprised patients whose tumour load exceeded the 5/5 criteria. Survival and recurrence rates were compared.

Results

For the 110 patients in the study, survival rates (overall and disease-free) were 72·8 and 66·8 per cent at 5 and 10 years respectively, with a 5·5 per cent recurrence rate. The 5-year survival rate was 65, 77, 68 and 77 per cent for Paul Brousse, Milan, UCSF and 5/5 preoperative radiological criteria, with recurrence rates of 4, 4, 3 and 3 per cent, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the only factor that influenced survival was tumour load in excess of the 5/5 criteria.

Conclusion

Use of the more liberal 5/5 criteria for selecting patients for liver transplantation results in similar disease-free and overall survival rates to classical criteria.

The estimated number of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma selected for liver transplantation using expanded selection criteria

Recently, several groups have introduced expanded criteria for selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prior to transplant, but the exact number of potential newly recruited patients remains unclear. This registry-based study assessed 270 patients diagnosed with HCC. The potential number of transplant candidates was based on age (< or =65 years), absence of metastases and macro-vascular invasion, and on 12 previously published, expanded selection criteria. A wide range of increase in the number of transplant candidates was observed (12-63% when compared with the number of such candidates who would have been selected solely based on the Milan criteria). The most conservative criteria were Seoul (Kwon, 2007; increase of 12%), Valencia (Silva, 2008; 16%), total tumor volume/alpha-fetoprotein (Toso, 2009; 20%) and UCSF (Yao, 2007; 20%). This data will assist Centers and policy agencies in predicting the need for resources linked to an expansion of criteria.

Reassessing selection criteria prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma utilizing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database

The current model of liver graft allocation in place in the United States favors transplantation of patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) within the Milan criteria (a single tumor up to 5 cm in diameter or up to three lesions, none larger than 3 cm). Although several reports have suggested that these criteria could be extended, there is currently no agreement on new selection tools. In this study, we performed an overview of 6478 adult recipients of an isolated first liver transplant registered in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database. From March 2002 to January 2008, increasing numbers of patients outside Milan criteria (P <or= 0.001) have been registered for a transplant, but they still represent less than 5% of the transplants performed for HCC. Of all the tested variables (tumor number, largest tumor size, and Milan and University of California San Francisco criteria), only total tumor volume (TTV; P <or= 0.05) and alpha fetoprotein (AFP; P <or= 0.001) could predict patient survival. While these two parameters demonstrated independent behaviors (no patient demonstrated an increase in both values), a composite score was defined, with patients with a TTV > 115 cm(3) or an AFP > 400 ng/mL being outside criteria. The combined TTV/AFP score efficiently predicted posttransplant survival (hazard ratio = 2, 95% confidence interval = 1.7-2.4, P <or= 0.001); patients not meeting these criteria had a survival below 50% at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

According to the present SRTR data, Milan criteria are too restrictive, and patients with larger TTV can enjoy satisfactory posttransplant survivals. A composite patient selection score combining TTV and AFP was the most effective of all tested staging criteria for the prediction of posttransplant patient survival for candidates with HCC.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing at an alarming rate in the United States, such that HCC has become an important indication for liver transplantation. The role of liver transplantation in patients with HCC has evolved over the past 2 decades, and transplantation has become one of the few curative treatment modalities for patients with HCC, especially in selected patients with favorable tumors. The advent of living donor liver transplantation for adult recipients provides another therapeutic venue, in particular for patients with HCC who are disadvantaged by current allocation algorithms for grafts from deceased donors. Living donor transplantation may limit the waiting time and, as a result, may decrease the progression of disease so that intuitively the recurrence rate should be lower than for recipients who wait for an organ from a deceased donor. There are limited data on the efficacy of living donor liver transplantation in the setting of HCC. Based on a limited cohort of patients undergoing transplantation for HCC at Northwestern University Medical Center, a higher recurrence rate, stage for stage, was found in recipients whose transplants were accelerated ("fast-tracked") by performing a living donor transplant, especially in the era in which patients with HCC were disadvantaged by the allocation algorithm. Clearly, the role of living donor liver transplantation in management of patients with HCC requires prospective direct analysis of both recurrence and dropout rates in comparable patient cohorts with HCC undergoing either deceased or living donor liver transplantation.