Hemispheric asymmetry of transcallosal inhibition in man

The callosal dilemma: explaining diaschisis in the context of hemispheric rivalry via a neural network model

It is often suggested that a major factor in diaschisis is the loss of transcallosal excitation to the intact hemisphere from the lesioned one. However, there is long-standing disagreement in the broader experimental literature about whether transcallosal interhemispheric influences in the human brain are primarily excitatory or inhibitory. Some experimental data are apparently better explained by assuming inhibitory callosal influences. Past neural network models attempting to explore this issue have encountered the same dilemma: in intact models, inhibitory callosal influences best explain strong cerebral lateralization like that occurring with language, but in lesioned models, excitatory callosal influences best explain experimentally observed hemispheric activation patterns following brain damage. We have now developed a single neural network model that can account for both types of data, i.e., both diaschisis and strong hemisphere specialization in the normal brain, by combining excitatory callosal influences with subcortical cross-midline inhibitory interactions. The results suggest that subcortical competitive processes may be a more important factor in cerebral specialization than is generally recognized.

Cortical map asymmetries in the context of transcallosal excitatory influences

There is long-standing disagreement among experimentalists about whether transcallosal interhemispheric influences are primarily excitatory or inhibitory. Past computational models exploring this issue have encountered a similar dilemma: inhibitory callosal influences best explain hemispheric functional asymmetries, but excitatory callosal influences best explain transcallosal diaschisis. We recently hypothesized that this dilemma might be resolved by assuming excitatory callosal influences and a subcortical mechanism for cross-midline inhibition. Here we explore the feasibility of this hypothesis by examining a model of map formation in corresponding left and right cortical regions. The results show for the first time that both map asymmetries and diaschisis-like changes can be produced in a single model, suggesting that subcortical inhibitory processes may contribute more to asymmetric cortical functionality than is generally recognized.

Hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral motor cortex activation during unimanual motor tasks: further evidence for motor dominance

OBJECTIVES

To test to which extent the increase in ipsilateral motor cortex excitability during unimanual motor tasks shows hemispheric asymmetry.

METHODS

Six right-handed healthy subjects performed one of several motor tasks of different complexity (including rest) with one hand (task hand) while the other hand (non-task hand) was relaxed. Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied to the motor cortex ipsilateral to the task hand and the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) in the non-task hand was measured. In one session, the task hand was the right hand, in the other session it was the left hand. The effects of motor task and side of the task hand were analyzed. Spinal motoneuron excitability was assessed using F-wave measurements.

RESULTS

Motor tasks, in particular complex finger sequences, resulted in an increase in MEP amplitude in the non-task hand. This increase was significantly less when the right hand rather than the left hand was the task hand. This difference was seen only in muscles homologous to primary task muscles. The asymmetry could not be explained by changes in F-wave amplitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral motor cortex activation either supports the idea that, in right handers, the left motor cortex is more active in ipsilateral hand movements, or alternatively, that the left motor cortex exerts more effective inhibitory control over the right motor cortex than vice versa. We suggest that hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral motor cortex activation is one property of motor dominance of the left motor cortex.

Inhibition of ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic generation of low force

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of different types of unilateral pinch grips on excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex.

METHODS

In 9 healthy volunteers, transcranial magnetic stimuli (TMS) were applied over one motor cortex while the subjects performed either phasic or tonic ipsilateral pinch grips with different force levels (range 1-40% maximum voluntary contraction, MVC). Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded from the relaxed contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) and were compared to MEPs obtained during muscle relaxation of both hands. In additional experiments, transcranial electrical stimuli (TES) were administered and F waves were recorded after electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve.

RESULTS

Phasic pinch grips with low force (1 and 2% MVC) induced a significant decrease of TMS-induced MEP amplitudes. The effect lasted for about 100 ms after reaching the force level and was similar for both right and left-handed pinch grips. TES-induced MEPs and F waves remained unchanged. In contrast, tonic contractions (20 and 40% MVC) enhanced MEPs in the homologous FDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Phasic pinch grips with low force inhibit the motor cortex responsible for the contralateral homologous hand muscle. This effect, which is probably mediated transcallosally, might act at the level of the motor cortex.

Corpus callosum and cerebral laterality in a modular brain model

This paper elaborates the function of corpus callosum in the brain model that contains encoding and modulating axons: the former encode data as presynaptic axonal 'on-off' patterns, and the latter help the former convert data into long-term memory through the development of long-term potentiation and depression. It is hypothesized that callosal axons transfer data codes as interhemispheric memory. Bisection of corpus callosum cuts off interhemispheric data transfer and results in strange-hand syndrome, decreased attention and difficulties in acquiring new interdependent bimanual skills. While uniting two hemispheres for a unitary consciousness, corpus callosum contributes to two similar sets of integrated abstract memory, one in each hemisphere. Therefore, it takes bilateral cerebral lesions to manifest a failure of converting short-term memory into long-term memory. The asymmetric callosal data transfer may correlate with cerebral laterality where a cerebral function, such as language, is conducted mainly in one hemisphere for the benefit of less interhemispheric data-traffic. Complete lateralization of a cerebral function is the rare occasion when the specialized neuron groups (modules) for that function all reside in one hemisphere. It is possible that many cerebral functions including language are incompletely lateralized, and corpus callosum links the non-lateralized modules with the lateralized ones. The more the cerebral lateralization, the fewer the non-lateralized modules to be linked, and the smaller the corpus callosum.

Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms

The aim of this study was to evaluate corticospinal excitability of both hemispheres during the reaction time (RT) using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Nine right-handed subjects performed right and left thumb extensions in simple (SRT), choice (CRT) and go/no-go auditory RT paradigms. TMS, inducing motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) simultaneously in the extensor pollicis brevis muscles bilaterally, was applied at different latencies from the tone. For all paradigms, MEP amplitudes on the side of movement increased progressively in the 80-120 ms before EMG onset, while the resting side showed inhibition. The inhibition was significantly more pronounced for right than for left thumb movements. For the left SRT, significant facilitation occurred on the right after EMG onset. Initial bilateral facilitation occurred in SRT trials with slow RT. After no-go tones, bilateral inhibition occurred at a time corresponding to the mean RT to go tones. The timing of the corticospinal rise in excitability on the side of movement was independent of task difficulty and RT. This suggests that corticospinal activation is, to some extent, in series and not in parallel with stimulus processing and response selection. Corticospinal inhibition on the side not to be moved implies that suppression of movement is an active process. This inhibition is more efficient for right- than for left-side movements in right-handed subjects, possibly because of left hemispheric dominance for movement.

Hemispheric asymmetries of cortico-cortical connections in human hand motor areas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate possible functional asymmetries of the motor cortex on the hand-dominant versus the non-dominant hemisphere.

METHODS

We assessed the handedness of 15 consenting volunteers using the Edinburgh Inventory. They were divided in two groups: 9 right-handers and 6 left-handers. We used single- and paired-transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure the relaxed and active motor threshold and the ipsilateral cortico-cortical inhibition and facilitation curve for both hand motor areas. We looked for hemispheric asymmetries of variables related to the side of stimulation (dominant versus non-dominant) and to handedness.

RESULTS

We found no significant intra- or intergroup hemispheric asymmetry for the relaxed and active thresholds. Among the right-handers, the cortico-cortical inhibition and facilitation curve showed an increased amount of facilitation in the dominant as compared with the non-dominant hand area. No such changes were seen among the left-handers. Both the dominant and the non-dominant hand areas of the right-handers showed more inhibition and less facilitation on the cortico-cortical inhibition and facilitation curve than the corresponding areas of left-handers.

CONCLUSION

In the right-handers, paired TMS studies showed a functional asymmetry of the motor cortex between the dominant and the non-dominant hand. The left-handers did not show this lateralization. Under TMS investigation their motor cortex function appeared different from that of right-handers.

Left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces contralesional extinction in patients with unilateral right brain damage

It has been demonstrated previously that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the sensorimotor cortex can induce transient suppression of the perception of cutaneous near-threshold stimuli from fingers of the contralateral hand in normal individuals. One explanation accounting for deficits in the exploration of contralateral space following a unilateral hemispheric lesion refers to a loss of the normal interhemispheric balance, with a resultant hyperactivation of the unaffected hemisphere due to the release of reciprocal inhibition by the affected one. In order to verify this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of a TMS-induced transient dysfunction of the normal hemisphere upon contralateral tactile extinctions in two groups: (i) 14 right brain-damaged patients and (ii) 14 left brain-damaged control patients. Single-pulse TMS was delivered to frontal and parietal scalp sites of the unaffected hemisphere after an interval of 40 ms from an electrical unimanual or bimanual digit stimulation. In right brain-damaged patients, left frontal TMS significantly reduced the rate of contralateral extinctions compared with controls. After left parietal TMS, the number of extinctions was comparable to the baseline. This pattern of increased sensitivity to cutaneous stimulation ipsilateral to TMS was not observed in left brain-damaged control patients. In this group, right hemisphere TMS did not significantly alter the recognition of bimanual stimuli delivered to the space contralateral to the lesion. The suggestion is made that extinctions produced by right brain damage may be dependent on a breakdown in the balance of hemispheric rivalry in directing spatial attention to contralateral hemispace, so that the unaffected hemisphere generates an unopposed orienting response to the side of the lesion. The mechanisms whereby the left frontal TMS transiently ameliorates these deficits may involve stimulus-induced removal of a left frontal-right parietal transcallosal inhibitory flow, although interactions at subcortical levels cannot be excluded.

Crossed reduction of human motor cortex excitability by 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation

Electrophysiological studies have shown that 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor area (M1) can produce a local decrease in excitability. Functional imaging data suggest that this change may be bilateral. In normal subjects, we measured motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude at a series of stimulation intensities in the contralateral M1 before and after 15 min of active or sham rTMS at just above the MEP threshold. The slope of the curve relating MEP amplitude and stimulation intensity was decreased in the unstimulated hemisphere by active but not sham rTMS. This demonstrates that rTMS can condition cortical excitability at a distance of one or more synapses and suggest that decreased excitability to TMS is a correlate of decreased blood flow and metabolism.

Postmovement beta synchronization in patients with Parkinson's disease

Event-related synchronization (ERS) after self-paced, voluntary brisk movement of the right and left thumb was studied in 17 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and 17 age-matched control subjects. All patients were receiving L-DOPA and/or DOPA-agonists. The movement-offset-triggered EEG data were analyzed in the 12- to 16-Hz, 16- to 20-Hz, and 20- to 24-Hz bands for eight time intervals after termination of movement. Significant differences in postmovement beta synchronization were observed in all three frequency bands. As compared with the control group, patients with PD showed a remarkably smaller beta ERS. This was the overall main effect for groups, as well as for interactions concerning side of movement and electrode positions. If beta ERS is a measure of recovery of the primary motor area after movement, our results indicate that this ability is impaired in PD patients.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation: its current role in epilepsy research

This paper reviews the current role of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in epilepsy research. After a brief introduction to the technical principles, the physiology and the safety aspects of TMS, emphasis is put on how human cortex excitability can be assessed by TMS and how this may improve our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in epilepsy and the mode of action of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Also, potential therapeutical applications of TMS are reviewed. For all aspects of this paper, a clear distinction was made between single-/paired-pulse TMS and repetitive TMS, since these two techniques have fundamentally different scopes and applications.

Modulation of plasticity in human motor cortex after forearm ischemic nerve block

Deafferentation leads to cortical reorganization that may be functionally beneficial or maladaptive. Therefore, we were interested in learning whether it is possible to purposely modulate deafferentation-induced reorganization. Transient forearm deafferentation was induced by ischemic nerve block (INB) in healthy volunteers. The following five interventions were tested: INB alone; INB plus low-frequency (0.1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex ipsilateral to INB (INB+rTMSi); rTMSi alone; INB plus rTMS of the motor cortex contralateral to INB (INB+rTMSc); and rTMSc alone. Plastic changes in the motor cortex contralateral to deafferentation were probed with TMS, measuring motor threshold (MT), motor evoked-potential (MEP) size, and intracortical inhibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF) to the biceps brachii muscle proximal to the level of deafferentation. INB alone induced a moderate increase in MEP size, which was significantly enhanced by INB+rTMSc but blocked by INB+rTMSi. INB alone had no effect on ICI or ICF, whereas INB+rTMSc reduced ICI and increased ICF, and conversely, INB+rTMSi deepened ICI and suppressed ICF. rTMSi and rTMSc alone were ineffective in changing any of these parameters. These findings indicate that the deafferented motor cortex becomes modifiable by inputs that are normally subthreshold for inducing changes in excitability. The deafferentation-induced plastic changes can be up-regulated by direct stimulation of the "plastic" cortex and likely via inhibitory projections down-regulated by stimulation of the opposite cortex. This modulation of cortical plasticity by noninvasive means might be used to facilitate plasticity when it is primarily beneficial or to suppress it when it is predominately maladaptive.

Modulation of plasticity in human motor cortex after forearm ischemic nerve block

Deafferentation leads to cortical reorganization that may be functionally beneficial or maladaptive. Therefore, we were interested in learning whether it is possible to purposely modulate deafferentation-induced reorganization. Transient forearm deafferentation was induced by ischemic nerve block (INB) in healthy volunteers. The following five interventions were tested: INB alone; INB plus low-frequency (0.1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex ipsilateral to INB (INB+rTMSi); rTMSi alone; INB plus rTMS of the motor cortex contralateral to INB (INB+rTMSc); and rTMSc alone. Plastic changes in the motor cortex contralateral to deafferentation were probed with TMS, measuring motor threshold (MT), motor evoked-potential (MEP) size, and intracortical inhibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF) to the biceps brachii muscle proximal to the level of deafferentation. INB alone induced a moderate increase in MEP size, which was significantly enhanced by INB+rTMSc but blocked by INB+rTMSi. INB alone had no effect on ICI or ICF, whereas INB+rTMSc reduced ICI and increased ICF, and conversely, INB+rTMSi deepened ICI and suppressed ICF. rTMSi and rTMSc alone were ineffective in changing any of these parameters. These findings indicate that the deafferented motor cortex becomes modifiable by inputs that are normally subthreshold for inducing changes in excitability. The deafferentation-induced plastic changes can be up-regulated by direct stimulation of the "plastic" cortex and likely via inhibitory projections down-regulated by stimulation of the opposite cortex. This modulation of cortical plasticity by noninvasive means might be used to facilitate plasticity when it is primarily beneficial or to suppress it when it is predominately maladaptive.

Motor imagery activates primary sensorimotor area in humans

The spatiotemporal patterns of Rolandic mu and beta rhythms were studied during motor imagery with a dense array of EEG electrodes. The subjects were instructed to imagine movements of either the right or the left hand, corresponding to visual stimuli on a computer screen. It was found that unilateral motor imagery results in a short-lasting and localized EEG change over the primary sensorimotor area. The Rolandic rhythms displayed an event-related desynchronization (ERD) only over the contralateral hemisphere. In two of the three investigated subjects, an enhanced Rolandic rhythm was found over the ipsilateral side. The pattern of EEG desynchronization related to imagination of a movement was similar to the pattern during planning of a voluntary movement.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals a hemispheric asymmetry correlate of intermanual differences in motor performance

Hemispheric asymmetries in the threshold for eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are associated with hand preference. We posited that hemispheric asymmetries in TMS thresholds may be strongly correlated with some hand-differences in motor performance. MEPs result from the activation of neuronal networks targeting large cortical motoneurons. Thus, MEP thresholds might reflect physiological features of the corticospinal motor system. Considering the role of corticospinal pathways in the control of independent finger movement, we hypothesized that MEP thresholds would better predict speed and dexterity than strength. In 30 right-handers and 30 left-handers, we correlated right and left hand-differences in the threshold for eliciting MEPs with hand-differences in the performance of three manual tasks: finger-tapping speed, pegboard dexterity, and grip strength. Correlations of hand-differences in TMS thresholds with hand-differences in performance indicated that a lower TMS threshold for one hand is strongly associated with greater ability with that hand. The correlations of hand-differences in TMS thresholds with hand-differences in finger-tapping and pegboard dexterity were significantly larger than the correlation of hand-differences in TMS thresholds with hand-differences in grip strength. Our results indicate that hemispheric asymmetries in MEP thresholds may have functional significance related to basic parameters of movement. These results are consistent with the critical role of the corticospinal motor system in the control of independent finger movement. Furthermore, they imply that asymmetry in the corticospinal motor system may be an important substrate for asymmetries in hand preference and performance.

Effects of handedness on movement-related changes of central beta rhythms

The effects of handedness on the movement-related changes in beta rhythms (14-30 Hz) in the left and right perirolandic area were analyzed in 12 right-handed and 11 left-handed subjects. The motor task consisted of unilateral brisk or slow self-paced extension of the right or left index finger. The handedness effects were as follows. First, in both handedness groups, the premovement desynchronization of beta rhythms at both hemispheres was greatest before slow movement of the "nondominant" finger, especially at electrodes presumably overlying the MI areas. Second, the lefthanded group showed less desynchronization in both hemispheres during execution of a slow movement than the righthanded group. Third, the postmovement beta synchronization showed a contralateral preponderance which was greater after movements of the nondominant than the "dominant" finger in the righthanded group and was equal for both fingers in the lefthanded group. The results suggest that handedness effects on movement-related changes in central beta rhythms are coupled to movements of the nondominant finger and that their manifestation differs in the pre- and postmovement periods.

The effects of external load on movement-related changes of the sensorimotor EEG rhythms

The effects of external load opposing brisk voluntary extension of the right index finger on the EEG rhythms in the left and right sensorimotor hand area were studied in 13 right-handed subjects. Four levels of external loads corresponding to the weights of 0 g (no load), 30 g, 80 g and 130 g were used. The effects of external load on EEG rhythms were the following: (i) prior to movement, the desynchronisation of beta-rhythms (18-25 Hz) over the contralateral sensorimotor area was greater under the two largest loads as compared to the 0 g load. However, beta-desynchronisation at ipsilateral electrodes was larger under the 80 g load than under the 130 g load, presumably due to a transcallosally mediated inhibition exerted by the highly excited contralateral motor area; (ii) the mu-rhythm desynchronisation continued over both hemispheres for about 0.3-0.4 s after movement and the largest load was accompanied by the longest mu-rhythm desynchronisation; (iii) the post-movement beta-synchronisation was also longer under the heaviest load (130 g) as compared to the no-load condition (0 g), especially in subjects who prolonged their total movement time under the heaviest load. The results show that (i) the movement-related desynchronisation and synchronisation of sensorimotor EEG rhythms is influenced by external load opposing finger movement, and (ii) the effects of external load differ for the mu- and beta-rhythms.

Event-related desynchronisation of central beta-rhythms during brisk and slow self-paced finger movements of dominant and nondominant hand

Changes in central beta-rhythms (14-29 Hz) during movement were investigated in 12 right-handed subjects by quantifying event-related desynchronisation (ERD). EEG was recorded from 24 closely spaced electrodes overlaying the left and right sensorimotor hand area. The subjects performed approximately 80 brisk (movement time < 0.21 s) and 80 slow (movement time 1.3-2.1 s) self-paced extensions of their left or right index finger. Beta-band power attenuation in the preparatory period (2.0-0.5 s before movement onset) was larger in the contralateral hemisphere in both types of movement and similar for both fingers. In the 0.4-s period before the onset of extensor muscle contraction, right-finger movements only showed a significant contralateral preponderance of beta-ERD. During movement an anterior ERD predominance in the right sensorimotor hand area and a widespread ERD in the left sensorimotor area was found for both fingers. The recovery and rebound of beta-rhythms showed contralateral preponderance which was expressed more in the right hemisphere, especially after left-finger movements. The results suggest that the dynamics of premovement desynchronisation and postmovement synchronisation of central beta-rhythms is related to hand dominance.

The effects of handedness and type of movement on the contralateral preponderance of mu-rhythm desynchronisation

Event-related desynchronisation (ERD) of mu-rhythm was studied in 12 right-handed and 11 left-handed subjects during brisk and slow self-paced index finger movements of dominant and nondominant hand. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from the sensorimotor hand area of both hemispheres. The contralateral preponderance of mu-rhythm ERD in the pre-movement period showed the following changes: (i) the contrasts between left- and right-finger movements were larger and earlier in the dominant than nondominant hemisphere in both handedness groups; (ii) right-handed subjects showed larger lateralisation of mu-rhythm ERD prior to right-finger as compared to left-finger movements, whereas about equal contralateral preponderance for both sides was found in the left-handed; (iii) the lateralisation of mu-rhythm ERD was lower prior to brisk as compared to slow movements, especially in the left-handed subjects. The results demonstrate that hand dominance, handedness and type of movement influence the proportion of pre-movement mu-rhythm desynchronisation in the left and right peri-rolandic area.