Crystal structure and mutational analysis of human uracil-DNA glycosylase: structural basis for specificity and catalysis

Purification and characterization of a novel UV lesion-specific DNA glycosylase/AP lyase from Bacillus sphaericus

The purification and characterization of a pyrimidine dimer-specific glycosylase/AP lyase from Bacillus sphaericus (Bsp-pdg) are reported. Bsp-pdg is highly specific for DNA containing the cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, displaying no detectable activity on oligonucleotides with trans-syn I, trans-syn II, (6-4), or Dewar photoproducts. Like other glycosylase/AP lyases that sequentially cleave the N--glycosyl bond of the 5' pyrimidine of a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, and the phosphodiester backbone, this enzyme appears to utilize a primary amine as the attacking nucleophile. The formation of a covalent enzyme-DNA imino intermediate is evidenced by the ability to trap this protein-DNA complex by reduction with sodium borohydride. Also consistent with its AP lyase activity, Bsp-pdg was shown to incise an AP site-containing oligonucleotide, yielding beta- and delta-elimination products. N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis of this 26 kDa protein revealed little amino acid homology to any previously reported protein. This is the first report of a glycosylase/AP lyase enzyme from Bacillus sphaericus that is specific for cis-syn pyrimidine dimers.

DNA repair: models for damage and mismatch recognition

Maintaining the integrity of the genome is critical for the survival of any organism. To achieve this, many families of enzymatic repair systems which recognize and repair DNA damage have evolved. Perhaps most intriguing about the workings of these repair systems is the actual damage recognition process. What are the chemical characteristics which are common to sites of nucleic acid damage that DNA repair proteins may exploit in targeting sites? Importantly, thermodynamic and kinetic principles, as much as structural factors, make damage sites distinct from the native DNA bases, and indeed, in many cases, these are the features which are believed to be exploited by repair enzymes. Current proposals for damage recognition may not fulfill all of the demands required of enzymatic repair systems given the sheer size of many genomes, and the efficiency with which the genome is screened for damage. Here we discuss current models for how DNA damage recognition may occur and the chemical characteristics, shared by damaged DNA sites, of which repair proteins may take advantage. These include recognition based upon the thermodynamic and kinetic instabilities associated with aberrant sites. Additionally, we describe how small changes in base pair structure can alter also the unique electronic properties of the DNA base pair pi-stack. Further, we describe photophysical, electrochemical, and biochemical experiments in which mismatches and other local perturbations in structure are detected using DNA-mediated charge transport. Finally, we speculate as to how this DNA electron transfer chemistry might be exploited by repair enzymes in order to scan the genome for sites of damage.

The alpha/beta fold uracil DNA glycosylases: a common origin with diverse fates

BACKGROUND

Uracil DNA glycosylases (UDGs) are major repair enzymes that protect DNA from mutational damage caused by uracil incorporated as a result of a polymerase error or deamination of cytosine. Four distinct families of UDGs have been identified, which show very limited sequence similarity to each other, although two of them have been shown to possess the same structural fold. The structural and evolutionary relationships between the rest of the UDGs remain uncertain.

RESULTS

Using sequence profile searches, multiple alignment analysis and protein structure comparisons, we show here that all known UDGs possess the same fold and must have evolved from a common ancestor. Although all UDGs catalyze essentially the same reaction, significant changes in the configuration of the catalytic residues were detected within their common fold, which probably results in differences in the biochemistry of these enzymes. The extreme sequence divergence of the UDGs, which is unusual for enzymes with the same principal activity, is probably due to the major role of the uracil-flipping caused by the conformational strain enacted by the enzyme on uracil-containing DNA, as compared with the catalytic action of individual polar residues. We predict two previously undetected families of UDGs and delineate a hypothetical scenario for their evolution.

CONCLUSIONS

UDGs form a single protein superfamily with a distinct structural fold and a common evolutionary origin. Differences in the catalytic mechanism of the different families combined with the construction of the catalytic pocket have, however, resulted in extreme sequence divergence of these enzymes.

Differential effects of single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBs) on uracil DNA glycosylases (UDGs) from Escherichia coli and mycobacteria

Deamination of cytosines results in accumulation of uracil residues in DNA, which unless repaired lead to GC-->AT transition mutations. Uracil DNA glyco-sylase excises uracil residues from DNA and initiates the base excision repair pathway to safeguard the genomic integrity. In this study, we have investigated the effect of single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBs) from Escherichia coli (Eco SSB) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtu SSB) on uracil excision from synthetic substrates by uracil DNA glycosylases (UDGs) from E. coli, Mycobacterium smegmatis and M.tuberculosis (referred to as Eco -, Msm - and Mtu UDGs respectively). Presence of SSBs with all the three UDGs resulted in decreased efficiency of uracil excision from a single-stranded 'unstructured' oligonucleo-tide, SS-U9. On the other hand, addition of Eco SSB to Eco UDG, or Mtu SSB to Mtu UDG reactions resulted in increased efficiency of uracil excision from a hairpin oligonucleotide containing dU at the second position in a tetraloop (Loop-U2). Interestingly, the efficiency of uracil excision by Msm UDG from the same substrate was decreased in the presence of either Eco- or Mtu SSBs. Furthermore, Mtu SSB also decreased uracil excision from Loop-U2 by Eco UDG. Our studies using surface plasmon resonance technique demonstrated interactions between the homologous combinations of SSBs and UDGs. Heterologous combinations either did not show detectable interaction (Eco SSB with Mtu UDG) or showed a relatively weaker interaction (Mtu SSB with Eco UDG). Taken together, our studies suggest differential interactions between the two groups (SSBs and UDGs) of the highly conserved proteins. Such studies may provide important clues to design selective inhibitors against this important class of DNA repair enzymes.

A read-ahead function in archaeal DNA polymerases detects promutagenic template-strand uracil

Deamination of cytosine to uracil is the most common promutagenic change in DNA, and it is greatly increased at the elevated growth temperatures of hyperthermophilic archaea. If not repaired to cytosine prior to replication, uracil in a template strand directs incorporation of adenine, generating a G.C --> A.U transition mutation in half the progeny. Surprisingly, genomic analysis of archaea has so far failed to reveal any homologues of either of the known families of uracil-DNA glycosylases responsible for initiating the base-excision repair of uracil in DNA, which is otherwise universal. Here we show that DNA polymerases from several hyperthermophilic archaea (including Vent and Pfu) specifically recognize the presence of uracil in a template strand and stall DNA synthesis before mutagenic misincorporation of adenine. A specific template-checking function in a DNA polymerase has not been observed previously, and it may represent the first step in a pathway for the repair of cytosine deamination in archaea.

DNA repair mechanisms for the recognition and removal of damaged DNA bases

Recent structural and biochemical studies have begun to illuminate how cells solve the problems of recognizing and removing damaged DNA bases. Bases damaged by environmental, chemical, or enzymatic mechanisms must be efficiently found within a large excess of undamaged DNA. Structural studies suggest that a rapid damage-scanning mechanism probes for both conformational deviations and local deformability of the DNA base stack. At susceptible lesions, enzyme-induced conformational changes lead to direct interactions with specific damaged bases. The diverse array of damaged DNA bases are processed through a two-stage pathway in which damage-specific enzymes recognize and remove the base lesion, creating a common abasic site intermediate that is processed by damage-general repair enzymes to restore the correct DNA sequence.

Protein mimicry of DNA from crystal structures of the uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor protein and its complex with Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), which is a critical enzyme in DNA base-excision repair that recognizes and removes uracil from DNA, is specifically and irreversably inhibited by the thermostable uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor protein (Ugi). A paradox for the highly specific Ugi inhibition of UDG is how Ugi can successfully mimic DNA backbone interactions for UDG without resulting in significant cross-reactivity with numerous other enzymes that possess DNA backbone binding affinity. High-resolution X-ray crystal structures of Ugi both free and in complex with wild-type and the functionally defective His187Asp mutant Escherichia coli UDGs reveal the detailed molecular basis for duplex DNA backbone mimicry by Ugi. The overall shape and charge distribution of Ugi most closely resembles a midpoint in a trajectory between B-form DNA and the kinked DNA observed in UDG:DNA product complexes. Thus, Ugi targets the mechanism of uracil flipping by UDG and appears to be a transition-state mimic for UDG-flipping of uracil nucleotides from DNA. Essentially all the exquisite shape, electrostatic and hydrophobic complementarity for the high-affinity UDG-Ugi interaction is pre-existing, except for a key flip of the Ugi Gln19 carbonyl group and Glu20 side-chain, which is triggered by the formation of the complex. Conformational changes between unbound Ugi and Ugi complexed with UDG involve the beta-zipper structural motif, which we have named for the reversible pairing observed between intramolecular beta-strands. A similar beta-zipper is observed in the conversion between the open and closed forms of UDG. The combination of extremely high levels of pre-existing structural complementarity to DNA binding features specific to UDG with key local conformational changes in Ugi resolves the UDG-Ugi paradox and suggests a potentially general structural solution to the formation of very high affinity DNA enzyme-inhibitor complexes that avoid cross- reactivity.

Envisioning the molecular choreography of DNA base excision repair

Recent breakthroughs integrate individual DNA repair enzyme structures, biochemistry and biology to outline the structural cell biology of the DNA base excision repair pathways that are essential to genome integrity. Thus, we are starting to envision how the actions, movements, steps, partners and timing of DNA repair enzymes, which together define their molecular choreography, are elegantly controlled by both the nature of the DNA damage and the structural chemistry of the participating enzymes and the DNA double helix.

Mutation of the uracil DNA glycosylase gene detected in glioblastoma

Despite extensive characterization of genetic changes in gliomas, the underlying etiology of these tumors remains largely unknown. Spontaneous DNA damage due to hydrolysis, methylation, and oxidation is a frequent event in the brain. Failure of DNA repair following this damage may contribute to tumorigenesis of gliomas. Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), an enzyme which excises uracil from DNA, is an important component of the base excision repair pathway. The sequence of a human homologue of uracil DNA glycosylase gene (UNG) has been recently identified. We performed PCR-based SSCP mutational analysis of UNG in 11 sporadic gliomas (six glioblastomas, two anaplastic astrocytomas, and three oligodendrogliomas) and eight glioblastoma cell lines. One out of six sporadic glioblastomas had a point mutation in exon 3, which resulted in a missense mutation in codon 143. None of the eight glioblastoma cell lines or the five non-glioblastoma sporadic gliomas showed a mutation. Genetic alterations of UNG may play a role in the development of a subset of primary glioblastomas.

Nuclear and mitochondrial splice forms of human uracil-DNA glycosylase contain a complex nuclear localisation signal and a strong classical mitochondrial localisation signal, respectively

Nuclear (UNG2) and mitochondrial (UNG1) forms of human uracil-DNA glycosylase are both encoded by the UNG gene but have different N-terminal sequences. We have expressed fusion constructs of truncated or site-mutated UNG cDNAs and green fluorescent protein cDNA and studied subcellular sorting. The unique 44 N-terminal amino acids in UNG2 are required, but not sufficient, for complete sorting to nuclei. In this part the motif R17K18R19is essential for sorting. The complete nuclear localization signal (NLS) in addition requires residues common to UNG2 and UNG1 within the 151 N-terminal residues. Replacement of certain basic residues within this region changed the pattern of subnuclear distribution of UNG2. The 35 unique N-terminal residues in UNG1 constitute a strong and complete mitochondrial localization signal (MLS) which when placed at the N-terminus of UNG2 overrides the NLS. Residues 11-28 in UNG1 have the potential of forming an amphiphilic helix typical of MLSs and residues 1-28 are essential and sufficient for mitochondrial import. These results demonstrate that UNG1 contains a classical and very strong MLS, whereas UNG2 contains an unusually long and complex NLS, as well as subnuclear targeting signals in the region common to UNG2 and UNG1.

Base flipping

Base flipping is the phenomenon whereby a base in normal B-DNA is swung completely out of the helix into an extrahelical position. It was discovered in 1994 when the first co-crystal structure was reported for a cytosine-5 DNA methyltransferase binding to DNA. Since then it has been shown to occur in many systems where enzymes need access to a DNA base to perform chemistry on it. Many DNA glycosylases that remove abnormal bases from DNA use this mechanism. This review describes systems known to use base flipping as well as many systems where it is likely to occur but has not yet been rigorously demonstrated. The mechanism and evolution of base flipping are also discussed.

Base excision repair initiation revealed by crystal structures and binding kinetics of human uracil-DNA glycosylase with DNA

Three high-resolution crystal structures of DNA complexes with wild-type and mutant human uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), coupled kinetic characterizations and comparisons with the refined unbound UDG structure help resolve fundamental issues in the initiation of DNA base excision repair (BER): damage detection, nucleotide flipping versus extrahelical nucleotide capture, avoidance of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site toxicity and coupling of damage-specific and damage-general BER steps. Structural and kinetic results suggest that UDG binds, kinks and compresses the DNA backbone with a 'Ser-Pro pinch' and scans the minor groove for damage. Concerted shifts in UDG simultaneously form the catalytically competent active site and induce further compression and kinking of the double-stranded DNA backbone only at uracil and AP sites, where these nucleotides can flip at the phosphate-sugar junction into a complementary specificity pocket. Unexpectedly, UDG binds to AP sites more tightly and more rapidly than to uracil-containing DNA, and thus may protect cells sterically from AP site toxicity. Furthermore, AP-endonuclease, which catalyzes the first damage-general step of BER, enhances UDG activity, most likely by inducing UDG release via shared minor groove contacts and flipped AP site binding. Thus, AP site binding may couple damage-specific and damage-general steps of BER without requiring direct protein-protein interactions.

The nuclear isoform of the highly conserved human uracil-DNA glycosylase is an Mr 36,000 phosphoprotein

We have previously demonstrated that human cells contain multiple forms of uracil-DNA glycosylase (Caradonna, S. J., Ladner, R., Hansbury, M., Kosciuk, M., Lynch, F., and Muller, S. J. (1996) Exp. Cell Res. 222, 345-359). One of these is an Mr 29,000 processed form of the highly conserved uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG1) located in the mitochondria. The others are located in the nucleus and migrate as a group of at least three distinct bands within the 35,000-37,000 molecular weight range. In this report, we perform a detailed characterization of the Mr 35,000-37,000 purified proteins. To accomplish this, uracil-DNA glycosylases were affinity purified from HeLa cell nuclear extracts. The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and their identities were verified by renaturation and activity assays. The three protein bands were individually digested with cyanogen bromide, and the resulting peptide fragments were analyzed by direct amino acid sequencing. Peptide sequence, derived from each band, was identical and corresponded to a recently identified isoform of UDG1. This isoform (UDG1A) has a unique 44-amino acid N-terminal region and a C-terminal region that is identical to UDG1. To begin to study the signals required for nuclear targeting, the N-terminal regions of UDG1 and UDG1A were isolated and cloned into pEGFP-N2 to generate fusions with a red-shifted variant of green fluorescent protein (GFP). When these constructs were transfected into NIH3T3 cells, UDG1/pEGFP was targeted to the mitochondria, and UDG1A/pEGFP was targeted to the nucleus. Further studies, using deletion mutants, demonstrate that the nuclear localization signal resides within the first 20 amino acids of UDG1A. To investigate the possibility that the heterogeneity observed on SDS-PAGE results from post-translational modification(s), the UDG/pEGFP fusion constructs were transfected into NIH3T3 cells, and the cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate. Results from these experiments show that UDG1A is a phosphoprotein. Subsequent phosphoamino acid analysis revealed that UDG1A is phosphorylated on both serine and threonine residues. As a final characterization, RNase protection assays were performed to examine expression of each of these isoforms. These studies demonstrate that UDG1A is expressed in a wide variety of cell types and that message levels are elevated in transformed cells.

Kinetics of the action of thymine DNA glycosylase

The time course of removal of thymine by thymine DNA glycosylase has been measured in vitro. Each molecule of thymine DNA glycosylase removes only one molecule of thymine from DNA containing a G.T mismatch because it binds tightly to the apurinic DNA site left after removal of thymine. The 5'-flanking base pair to G.T mismatches influences the rate of removal of thymine: kcat values with C.G, T.A, G.C, and A.T as the 5'-base pair were 0.91, 0.023, 0. 0046, and 0.0013 min-1, respectively. Thymine DNA glycosylase can also remove thymine from mismatches with S6-methylthioguanine, but, unlike G.T mismatches, a 5'-C.G does not have a striking effect on the rate: kcat values for removal of thymine from SMeG.T with C.G, T. A, G.C, and A.T as the 5'-base pair were 0.026, 0.018, 0.0017, and 0. 0010 min-1, respectively. Thymine removal is fastest when it is from a G.T mismatch with a 5'-flanking C.G pair, suggesting that the rapid reaction of this substrate involves contacts between the enzyme and oxygen 6 or the N-1 hydrogen of the mismatched guanine as well as the 5'-flanking C.G pair. Disrupting either of these sets of contacts (i.e. replacing the 5'-flanking C.G base pair with a T.A or replacing the G.T mismatch with SMeG.T) has essentially the same effect on rate as disrupting both sets (i.e. replacing CpG.T with TpSMeG.T), and so these contacts are probably cooperative. The glycosylase removes uracil from G.U, C.U, and T.U base pairs faster than it removes thymine from G.T. It can even remove uracil from A.U base pairs, although at a very much lower rate. Thus, thymine DNA glycosylase may play a backup role to the more efficient general uracil DNA glycosylase.

Structures of apurinic and apyrimidinic sites in duplex DNAs

Natural and exogenous processes can give rise to abasic sites with either a purine or pyrimidine as the base on the opposing strand. The solution state structures of the apyrimidinic DNA duplex, with D6 indicating an abasic site, [sequence: see text] referred to as AD, and the apurinic DNA duplex with a dC17, referred to as CD, have been determined. A particularly striking difference is that the abasic site in CD is predominantly a beta hemiacetal, whereas in AD the alpha and beta forms are equally present. Hydrogen bonding with water by the abasic site and the base on the opposite strand appears to play a large role in determining the structure near the damaged site. Comparison of these structures with that of a duplex DNA containing a thymine glycol at the same position as the abasic site and with that of a duplex DNA containing an abasic site in the middle of a curved DNA sequence offers some insight into the common and distinct structural features of damaged DNA sites.

Diversity of HIV-1 Vpr interactions involves usage of the WXXF motif of host cell proteins

Targeting protein or RNA moieties to specific cellular compartments may enhance their desired functions and specificities. Human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) encodes proteins in addition to Gag, Pol, and Env that are packaged into virus particles. One such retroviral-incorporated protein is Vpr, which is present in all primate lentiviruses. Vpr has been implicated in different roles within the HIV-1 life cycle. In testing a new hypothesis in which viral proteins are utilized as docking sites to incorporate protein moieties into virions, we used the peptide phage display approach to search for Vpr-specific binding peptides. In the present studies, we demonstrate that most of the peptides that bind to Vpr have a common motif, WXXF. More importantly, we demonstrate that the WXXF motif of uracil DNA glycosylase is implicated in the interaction of uracil DNA glycosylase with Vpr intracellularly. Finally, a dimer of the WXXF motif was fused to the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene, and it was demonstrated that the WXXF dimer-CAT fusion protein construct produces CAT activity within virions in the presence of Vpr as a docking protein. This study provides a novel potential strategy in the targeting of anti-viral agents to interfere with HIV-1 replication.

Regulation of expression of nuclear and mitochondrial forms of human uracil-DNA glycosylase

Promoters PA and PBin the UNG gene and alternative splicing are utilized to generate nuclear (UNG2) and mitochondrial (UNG1) forms of human uracil-DNA glycosylase. We have found the highest levels of UNG1 mRNA in skeletal muscle, heart and testis and the highest UNG2 mRNA levels in testis, placenta, colon, small intestine and thymus, all of which contain proliferating cells. In synchronized HaCaT cells mRNAs for both forms increased in late G1/early S phase, accompanied by a 4- to 5-fold increase in enzyme activity. A combination of mutational analysis and transient transfection demonstrated that an E2F-1/DP-1-Rb complex is a strong negative regulator of both promoters, whereas 'free' E2F-1/DP-1 is a weak positive regulator, although a consensus element for E2F binding is only present in PB. These results indicate a central role for an E2F-DP-1-Rb complex in cell cycle regulation of UNG proteins. Sp1 and c-Myc binding elements close to transcription start areas were positive regulators of both promoters, however, whereas overexpression in HeLa cells of Sp1 stimulated both promoters, c-Myc and c-Myc/Max overexpression had a suppressive effect. CCAAT elements were negative regulators of PB, but positive regulators of PA. These results demonstrate differential expression of mRNAs for UNG1 and UNG2 in human tissues.

Activity of Escherichia coli DNA-glycosylases on DNA damaged by methylating and ethylating agents and influence of 3-substituted adenine derivatives

Methylating and ethylating agents are used in the chemical industry and produced during tobacco smoking. They generate DNA base damage whose role in cancer induction has been documented. Alkylated bases are repaired by the base excision repair pathway. We have established the repair efficiency of methylated and ethylated bases by various Escherichia coli repair proteins, namely 3-methyladenine-DNA-glycosylase I (TagA protein), which excises 3-methyladenine and 3-methylguanine, 3-methyladenine-DNA-glycosylase II (AlkA protein), which has a broad substrate specificity including 3- and 7-alkylated purines and the formamidopyrimidine(Fapy)-DNA-glycosylase (Fpg protein) repairing imidazole ring-opened 7-methylguanine. The comparison of the Km values of these various enzymes showed that methylated bases were excised more efficiently than ethylated bases. Several 3-alkyladenine derivatives have been synthesized and examined for their ability to inhibit the activity of the various repair proteins. We have shown that 3-ethyl-, 3-propyl-, 3-butyl- and 3-benzyladenine were much more efficient inhibitors of TagA protein than 3-methyladenine. The inhibitory effect was increased with the increase of the size of alkyl-group and IC50 for 3-benzyladenine was 0.4 +/- 0.1 microM as compared to 1.5 +/- 0.3 mM for 3-methyladenine. These compounds inhibited neither the AlkA protein nor human 3-methyladenine-DNA-glycosylase (ANPG protein). Moreover, 3-hydroxyethyladenine did not affect the activity of any of these enzymes. Taken together, these results suggest that hydrophobic interactions are involved in the mechanism of inhibition and/or recognition and excision of alkylated purines by TagA protein.

Probing of conformational changes in human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyl transferase protein in its alkylated and DNA-bound states by limited proteolysis

Human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyl transferase (hAGT) is a DNA repair protein that protects cells from alkylation damage by transferring an alkyl group from the O6-position of guanine to a cysteine residue in the active site (-PCHR-) of the protein. The structure of the hAGT protein (23 kDa) has been probed by limited proteolysis with trypsin and Glu-C endoproteases and analysis of the polypeptide fragments by SDS/PAGE. The native hAGT protein had limited accessibility to digestion with trypsin and Glu-C in spite of a number of potential cleavage sites. Initial cleavage by trypsin occurred at residue Lys-193 to give a 21 kDa polypeptide fragment, and this polypeptide underwent further cleavage at residues Arg-128 and Lys-165. These trypsin-cleavage sites became more accessible to digestion in the presence of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), indicating that hAGT undergoes a change in its conformation on binding to DNA. However, the trypsin cutting site at the Arg-128 position was less available for digestion in the presence of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), suggesting that the hAGT protein has a different conformation when bound to ssDNA compared with dsDNA. When protease digestion was carried out on wild-type protein, preincubated with the low-molecular-mass pseudosubstrate O6-benzylguanine, increased susceptibility to proteases was observed. A mutant C145A hAGT protein, which cannot repair O6-alkylguanine because the Cys-145 acceptor site in the active site of the protein is changed to Ala, showed identical trypsin cleavage to the wild type, but its digestion was not affected by O6-benzylguanine. These results suggest that alkylation of hAGT leads to an altered conformation. The acquisition of increased susceptibility to proteases upon DNA binding and alkylation demonstrates that hAGT undergoes considerable conformational changes in its structure upon binding to DNA and after repair of alkylation damage.

Crystal structure of a G:T/U mismatch-specific DNA glycosylase: mismatch recognition by complementary-strand interactions

G:U mismatches resulting from deamination of cytosine are the most common promutagenic lesions occurring in DNA. Uracil is removed in a base-excision repair pathway by uracil DNA-glycosylase (UDG), which excises uracil from both single- and double-stranded DNA. Recently, a biochemically distinct family of DNA repair enzymes has been identified, which excises both uracil and thymine, but only from mispairs with guanine. Crystal structures of the mismatch-specific uracil DNA-glycosylase (MUG) from E. coli, and of a DNA complex, reveal a remarkable structural and functional homology to UDGs despite low sequence identity. Details of the MUG structure explain its thymine DNA-glycosylase activity and the specificity for G:U/T mispairs, which derives from direct recognition of guanine on the complementary strand.

Direct measurement of the substrate preference of uracil-DNA glycosylase

Site-directed mutants of the herpes simplex virus type 1 uracil-DNA glycosylase lacking catalytic activity have been used to probe the substrate recognition of this highly conserved and ubiquitous class of DNA-repair enzyme utilizing surface plasmon resonance. The residues aspartic acid-88 and histidine-210, implicated in the catalytic mechanism of the enzyme (Savva, R., McAuley-Hecht, K., Brown, T., and Pearl, L. (1995) Nature 373, 487-493; Slupphaug, G., Mol, C. D., Kavli, B., Arvai, A. S., Krokan, H. E. and Tainer, J. A. (1996) Nature 384, 87-92) were separately mutated to asparagine to allow investigations of substrate recognition in the absence of catalysis. The mutants were shown to be correctly folded and to lack catalytic activity. Binding to single- and double-stranded oligonucleotides, with or without uracil, was monitored by real-time biomolecular interaction analysis using surface plasmon resonance. Both mutants exhibited comparable rates of binding and dissociation on the same uracil-containing substrates. Interaction with single-stranded uracil-DNA was found to be stronger than with double-stranded uracil-DNA, and the binding to Gua:Ura mismatches was significantly stronger than that to Ade:Ura base pairs suggesting that the stability of the base pair determines the efficiency of interaction. Also, there was negligible interaction between the mutants and single- or double-stranded DNA lacking uracil, or with DNA containing abasic sites. These results suggest that it is uracil in the DNA, rather than DNA itself, that is recognized by the uracil-DNA glycosylases.

Base excision repair enzyme family portrait: integrating the structure and chemistry of an entire DNA repair pathway

DNA base excision repair (BER) is essential to preserving the integrity of the genome. Recent crystallographic studies of representatives from each enzyme class required for BER reveal clues to the structural basis of an entire DNA repair pathway.

Further characterization of Escherichia coli endonuclease V. Mechanism of recognition for deoxyinosine, deoxyuridine, and base mismatches in DNA

Endonuclease V from Escherichia coli has a wide substrate spectrum. In addition to deoxyinosine-containing DNA, the enzyme cleaves DNA containing urea residues, AP sites, base mismatches, insertion/deletion mismatches, flaps, and pseudo-Y structures. The gene coding for the enzyme was identified to be orf 225 or nfi (endonuclease five). Using enzyme purified from an overproducing strain, the deoxyinosine- and mismatch-specific activities of endonuclease V was found to have different divalent metal requirements. The affinity of the enzyme is greater than 20-fold higher for DNA containing deoxyinosine than deoxynebularine or base mismatches. Under optimal cleavage conditions, endonuclease V forms two stable complexes with DNA containing deoxyinosine, but not with DNA containing base mismatches or deoxynebularine, suggesting that the 6-keto group of hypoxanthine in DNA is critical for stable interactions with the protein. The enzyme recognizes deoxyuridine in DNA but exhibits a much lower affinity to DNA containing deoxyuridine compared with DNA containing deoxyinosine. Interestingly, deoxyuridine-specific endonuclease activity of endonuclease V has a divalent metal requirement similar to the mismatch activity. A model for the mechanism of substrate recognition is proposed to explain these different activities.

Nick sensing by vaccinia virus DNA ligase requires a 5' phosphate at the nick and occupancy of the adenylate binding site on the enzyme

Vaccinia virus DNA ligase has an intrinsic nick-sensing function. The enzyme discriminates at the substrate binding step between a DNA containing a 5' phosphate and a DNA containing a 5' hydroxyl at the nick. Further insights into nick recognition and catalysis emerge from studies of the active-site mutant K231A, which is unable to form the covalent ligase-adenylate intermediate and hence cannot activate a nicked DNA substrate via formation of the DNA-adenylate intermediate. Nonetheless, K231A does catalyze phosphodiester bond formation at a preadenylated nick. Hence, the active-site lysine of DNA ligase is not required for the strand closure step of the ligation reaction. The K231A mutant binds tightly to nicked DNA-adenylate but has low affinity for a standard DNA nick. The wild-type vaccinia virus ligase, which is predominantly ligase-adenylate, binds tightly to a DNA nick. This result suggests that occupancy of the AMP binding pocket of DNA ligase is essential for stable binding to DNA. Sequestration of an extrahelical nucleotide by DNA-bound ligase is reminiscent of the base-flipping mechanism of target-site recognition and catalysis used by other DNA modification and repair enzymes.

The DNA damage-recognition problem in human and other eukaryotic cells: the XPA damage binding protein

The capacity of human and other eukaryotic cells to recognize a disparate variety of damaged sites in DNA, and selectively excise and repair them, resides in a deceptively small simple protein, a 38-42 kDa zinc-finger binding protein, XPA (xeroderma pigmentosum group A), that has no inherent catalytic properties. One key to its damage-recognition ability resides in a DNA-binding domain which combines a zinc finger and a single-strand binding region which may infiltrate small single-stranded regions caused by helix-destabilizing lesions. Another is the augmentation of its binding capacity by interactions with other single-stranded binding proteins and helicases which co-operate in the binding and are unloaded at the binding site to facilitate further unwinding of the DNA and subsequent catalysis. The properties of these reactions suggest there must be considerable conformational changes in XPA and associated proteins to provide a flexible fit to a wide variety of damaged structures in the DNA.

The role of base flipping in damage recognition and catalysis by T4 endonuclease V

The process of moving a DNA base extrahelical (base flipping) has been shown in the co-crystal structure of a UV-induced pyrimidine dimer-specific glycosylase, T4 endonuclease V, with its substrate DNA. Compared with other enzymes known to use base flipping, endonuclease V is unique in that it moves the base opposite the target site extrahelical, rather than moving the target base itself. Utilizing substrate analogs and catalytically inactive mutants of T4 endonuclease V, this study investigates the discrete steps involved in damage recognition by this DNA repair enzyme. Specifically, fluorescence spectroscopy analysis shows that fluorescence changes attributable to base flipping are specific for only the base directly opposite either abasic site analogs or the 5'-thymine of a pyrimidine dimer, and no changes are detected if the 2-aminopurine is moved opposite the 3'-thymine of the pyrimidine dimer. Interestingly, base flipping is not detectable with every specific binding event suggesting that damage recognition can be achieved without base flipping. Thus, base flipping does not add to the stability of the specific enzyme-DNA complex but rather induces a conformational change to facilitate catalysis at the appropriate target site. When used in conjunction with structural information, these types of analyses can yield detailed mechanistic models and critical amino acid residues for extrahelical base movement as a mode of damage recognition.

Repair of oxidized DNA bases in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

An essential requirement for all organisms is to maintain its genomic integrity. Failure to do so, in multicellular organisms such as man, can lead to degenerative pathologies such as cancer and aging. Indeed, a very low spontaneous mutation rate is observed in eukaryotes, suggesting either an inherent stability of the genome or efficient DNA repair mechanisms. In fact, DNA is subjected to unceasing attacks by a variety of endogenous and environmental reactive chemical species yielding a multiplicity of DNA damage, the deleterious action of which is counteracted by efficient repair enzymes. Reactive oxygen species formed in cell as by-products of normal metabolism are probably the major source of endogenous DNA damage. Amongst oxidative damage, base modifications constitute an important class of lesions whose lethal or mutagenic action has been established. Oxidatively damaged DNA bases are mostly repaired by the base excision repair pathway (BER) in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. However, the nucleotide excision repair pathway (NER) may also play a role in the repair of some oxidized bases in DNA. Here, we describe repair pathways implicated in the removal of oxidized bases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast is a simple organism that can be used as a paradigm for DNA repair in all eukaryotic cells. S cerevisiae possesses three DNA glycosylases that catalyze the excision of oxidized bases from damaged DNA: the Ogg1, Ntg1 and Ntg2 proteins. The aim of this review is to summarize recent findings dealing with the formation, the biological consequences and the repair of oxidized DNA bases in S cerevisiae.

The critical active-site amine of the human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase, hOgg1: direct identification, ablation and chemical reconstitution

BACKGROUND

Base-excision DNA repair (BER) is the principal pathway responsible for the removal of aberrant, genotoxic bases from the genome and restoration of the original sequence. Key components of the BER pathway are DNA glycosylases, enzymes that recognize aberrant bases in the genome and catalyze their expulsion. One major class of such enzymes, glycosylase/lyases, also catalyze scission of the DNA backbone following base expulsion. Recent studies indicate that the glycosylase and lyase functions of these enzymes are mechanistically unified through a common amine-bearing residue on the enzyme, which acts as both the electrophile that displaces the aberrant base and an electron sink that facilitates DNA strand scission through imine (Schiff base)/conjugate elimination chemistry. The identity of this critical amine-bearing residue has not been rigorously established for any member of a superfamily of BER glycosylase/lyases.

RESULTS

Here, we report the identification of the active-site amine of the human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (hOgg1), a human BER superfamily protein that repairs the mutagenic 8-oxoguanine lesion in DNA. We employed Edman sequencing of an active-site peptide irreversibly linked to substrate DNA to identify directly the active-site amine of hOgg1 as the epsilon-NH2 group of Lys249. In addition, we observed that the repair-inactive but recognition-competent Cys249 mutant (Lys249-->Cys) of hOgg1 can be functionally rescued by alkylation with 2-bromoethylamine, which functionally replaces the lysine residue by generating a gamma-thia-lysine.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first direct identification of the active-site amine for any DNA glycosylase/lyase belonging to the BER superfamily, members of which are characterized by the presence of a helix-hairpin-helix-Gly/Pro-Asp active-site motif. The critical lysine residue identified here is conserved in all members of the BER superfamily that exhibit robust glycosylase/lyase activity. The ability to trigger the catalytic activity of the Lys249-->Cys mutant of hOgg1 by treatment with the chemical inducer 2-bromoethylamine may permit snapshots to be taken of the enzyme acting on its substrate and could represent a novel strategy for conditional activation of catalysis by hOgg1 in cells.

Site-directed mutagenesis and characterization of uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor protein. Role of specific carboxylic amino acids in complex formation with Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase

Bacteriophage PBS2 uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor (Ugi) protein inactivates uracil-DNA glycosylase (Ung) by acting as a DNA mimic to bind Ung in an irreversible complex. Seven mutant Ugi proteins (E20I, E27A, E28L, E30L, E31L, D61G, and E78V) were created to assess the role of various negatively charged residues in the binding mechanism. Each mutant Ugi protein was purified and characterized with respect to inhibitor activity and Ung binding properties relative to the wild type Ugi. Analysis of the Ugi protein solution structures by nuclear magnetic resonance indicated that the mutant Ugi proteins were folded into the same general conformation as wild type Ugi. All seven of the Ugi proteins were capable of forming a Ung.Ugi complex but varied considerably in their individual ability to inhibit Ung activity. Like the wild type Ugi, five of the mutants formed an irreversible complex with Ung; however, the binding of Ugi E20I and E28L to Ung was shown to be reversible. The tertiary structure of [13C,15N]Ugi in complex with Ung was determined by solution state multi-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance and compared with the unbound Ugi structure. Structural and functional analysis of these proteins have elucidated the two-step mechanism involved in Ung.Ugi association and irreversible complex formation.

DNA glycosylases in the base excision repair of DNA

A wide range of cytotoxic and mutagenic DNA bases are removed by different DNA glycosylases, which initiate the base excision repair pathway. DNA glycosylases cleave the N-glycosylic bond between the target base and deoxyribose, thus releasing a free base and leaving an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. In addition, several DNA glycosylases are bifunctional, since they also display a lyase activity that cleaves the phosphodiester backbone 3' to the AP site generated by the glycosylase activity. Structural data and sequence comparisons have identified common features among many of the DNA glycosylases. Their active sites have a structure that can only bind extrahelical target bases, as observed in the crystal structure of human uracil-DNA glycosylase in a complex with double-stranded DNA. Nucleotide flipping is apparently actively facilitated by the enzyme. With bacteriophage T4 endonuclease V, a pyrimidine-dimer glycosylase, the enzyme gains access to the target base by flipping out an adenine opposite to the dimer. A conserved helix-hairpin-helix motif and an invariant Asp residue are found in the active sites of more than 20 monofunctional and bifunctional DNA glycosylases. In bifunctional DNA glycosylases, the conserved Asp is thought to deprotonate a conserved Lys, forming an amine nucleophile. The nucleophile forms a covalent intermediate (Schiff base) with the deoxyribose anomeric carbon and expels the base. Deoxyribose subsequently undergoes several transformations, resulting in strand cleavage and regeneration of the free enzyme. The catalytic mechanism of monofunctional glycosylases does not involve covalent intermediates. Instead the conserved Asp residue may activate a water molecule which acts as the attacking nucleophile.

Contrasting effects of single stranded DNA binding protein on the activity of uracil DNA glycosylase from Escherichia coli towards different DNA substrates

Excision of uracil from tetraloop hairpins and single stranded ('unstructured') oligodeoxyribonucleotides by Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase has been investigated. We show that, compared with a single stranded reference substrate, uracil from the first, second, third and the fourth positions of the loops is excised with highly variable efficiencies of 3.21, 0.37, 5.9 and 66.8%, respectively. More importantly, inclusion of E.coli single stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) in the reactions resulted in approximately 7-140-fold increase in the efficiency of uracil excision from the first, second or the third position in the loop but showed no significant effect on its excision from the fourth position. In contrast, the presence of SSB decreased uracil excision from the single stranded ('unstructured') substrates approximately 2-3-fold. The kinetic studies show that the increased efficiency of uracil release from the first, second and the third positions of the tetraloops is due to a combination of both the improved substrate binding and a large increase in the catalytic rates. On the other hand, the decreased efficiency of uracil release from the single stranded substrates ('unstructured') is mostly due to the lowering of the catalytic rates. Chemical probing with KMnO4showed that the presence of SSB resulted in the reduction of cleavage of the nucleotides in the vicinity of dUMP residue in single stranded substrates but their increased susceptibility in the hairpin substrates. We discuss these results to propose that excision of uracil from DNA-SSB complexes by uracil DNA glycosylase involves base flipping. The use of SSB in the various applications of uracil DNA glycosylase is also discussed.

The mouse uracil-DNA glycosylase gene: isolation of cDNA and genomic clones and mapping ung to mouse chromosome 5

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) is the enzyme responsible for the first step in the base-excision repair pathway that specifically removes uracil from DNA. Here we report the isolation of the cDNA and genomic clones for the mouse uracil-DNA glycosylase gene (ung) homologous to the major placental uracil-DNA glycosylase gene (UNG) of humans. The complete characterization of the genomic organization of the mouse uracil-DNA glycosylase gene shows that the entire mRNA coding region for the 1.83-kb cDNA of the mouse ung gene is contained in an 8.2-kb SstI genomic fragment which includes six exons and five introns. The cDNA encodes a predicted uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) protein of 295 amino acids (33 kDa) that is highly similar to a group of UDGs that have been isolated from a wide variety of organisms. The mouse ung gene has been mapped to mouse chromosome 5 using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Mutagenic and epigenetic effects of DNA methylation

Tumorigenesis begins with the disregulated growth of an abnormal cell that has acquired the ability to divide more rapidly than its normal counterparts (Nowell, P.C. (1976) Science, 194, 23-28 [1]). Alterations in global levels and regional changes in the patterns of DNA methylation are among the earliest and most frequent events known to occur in human cancers (Feinberg and Vogelstein (1983) Nature, 301, 89-92 ([2]); Gama-Sosa, M.A. et al. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res., 11, 6883-6894 ([3]); Jones, P.A. (1986) Cancer Res., 46, 461-466 [4]). These changes in methylation may impair the proper expression and/or function of cell-cycle regulatory genes and thus confer a selective growth advantage to affected cells. Developments in the field of cancer research over the past few years have led to an increased understanding of the role DNA methylation may play in tumorigenesis. Many of these studies have investigated two major mechanisms by which DNA methylation may lead to aberrant cell cycle control: (1) through the generation of transition mutations via deamination-driven events resulting in the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, or (2) by altering levels of gene expression through epigenetic effects at CpG islands. The mechanisms by which the normal function of growth regulatory genes may become affected by the mutagenic and epigenetic properties of DNA methylation will be discussed in the framework of recent discoveries in the field.

Repair of O6-benzylguanine by the Escherichia coli Ada and Ogt and the human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferases

O6-Methylguanine is removed from DNA via the transfer of the methyl group to a cysteine acceptor site present in the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. The human alkyltransferase is inactivated by the free base O6-benzylguanine, raising the possibility that substantially larger alkyl groups could also be accepted as substrates. However, the Escherichia coli alkyltransferase, Ada-C, is not inactivated by O6-benzylguanine. The Ada-C protein was rendered capable of reaction by the incorporation of two site-directed mutations converting Ala316 to a proline (A316P) and Trp336 to alanine (W336A) or glycine (W336G). These changes increase the space at the active site of the protein where Cys321 is buried and thus permit access of the O6-benzylguanine inhibitor. Reaction of the mutant A316P/W336A-Ada-C with O6-benzylguanine was greatly stimulated by the presence of DNA, providing strong support for the concept that binding of DNA to the Ada-C protein activates the protein. The Ada-C protein was able to repair O6-benzylguanine in a 16-mer oligodeoxyribonucleotide. However, the rate of repair was very slow, whereas the E. coli Ogt, the human alkyltransferase, and the mutant A316P/W336A-Ada-C alkyltransferases reacted very rapidly with this 16-mer substrate and preferentially repaired it when incubated with a mixture of the methylated and benzylated 16-mers. These results show that benzyl groups are better substrates than methyl groups for alkyltransferases provided that steric factors do not prevent binding of the substrate in the correct orientation for alkyl group transfer.

A sequence in the N-terminal region of human uracil-DNA glycosylase with homology to XPA interacts with the C-terminal part of the 34-kDa subunit of replication protein A

Uracil-DNA glycosylase releases free uracil from DNA and initiates base excision repair for removal of this potentially mutagenic DNA lesion. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, human uracil-DNA glycosylase encoded by the UNG gene (UNG) was found to interact with the C-terminal part of the 34-kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA2). No interaction with RPA4 (a homolog of RPA2), RPA1, or RPA3 was observed. A sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with trimeric RPA and the two-hybrid system both demonstrated that the interaction depends on a region in UNG localized between amino acids 28 and 79 in the open reading frame. In this part of UNG a 23-amino acid sequence has a significant homology to the RPA2-binding region of XPA, a protein involved in damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair. Trimeric RPA did not enhance the activity of UNG in vitro on single- or double-stranded DNA. A part of the N-terminal region of UNG corresponding in size to the complete presequence was efficiently removed by proteinase K, leaving the proteinase K-resistant compact catalytic domain intact and fully active. These results indicate that the N-terminal part constitutes a separate structural domain required for RPA binding and suggest a possible function for RPA in base excision repair.

Nuclear and mitochondrial uracil-DNA glycosylases are generated by alternative splicing and transcription from different positions in the UNG gene

A distinct nuclear form of human uracil-DNA glycosylase [UNG2, open reading frame (ORF) 313 amino acid residues] from the UNG gene has been identified. UNG2 differs from the previously known form (UNG1, ORF 304 amino acid residues) in the 44 amino acids of the N-terminal sequence, which is not necessary for catalytic activity. The rest of the sequence and the catalytic domain, altogether 269 amino acids, are identical. The alternative N-terminal sequence in UNG2 arises by splicing of a previously unrecognized exon (exon 1A) into a consensus splice site after codon 35 in exon 1B (previously designated exon 1). The UNG1 sequence starts at codon 1 in exon 1B and thus has 35 amino acids not present in UNG2. Coupled transcription/translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysates demonstrated that both proteins are catalytically active. Similar forms of UNG1 and UNG2 are expressed in mouse which has an identical organization of the homologous gene. Constructs that express fusion products of UNG1 or UNG2 and green fluorescent protein (EGFP) were used to study the significance of the N-terminal sequences in UNG1 and UNG2 for subcellular targeting. After transient transfection of HeLa cells, the pUNG1-EGFP-N1 product colocalizes with mitochondria, whereas the pUNG2-EGFP-N1 product is targeted exclusively to nuclei.

DNA-repair enzymes

Recent crystallographic studies of DNA-repair enzymes have provided the structural basis for the recognition of damaged DNA. The results imply that flipping out of the base is a common and crucial event in DNA repair. Two classes of repair enzymes that recognize distinct types of damage may exist. DNA-repair enzymes that share similar folds and DNA binding motifs have been proposed to belong to a superfamily.

DNA distortion and base flipping by the EcoRV DNA methyltransferase. A study using interference at dA and T bases and modified deoxynucleosides

The EcoRV DNA methyltransferase introduces a CH3 group at the 6-amino position of the first dA in the duplex sequence d(GATATC). It has previously been reported that the methylase contacts the four phosphates (pNpNpGpA) at, and preceding, the 5'-end of the recognition sequence as well as the single dG in this sequence (Szczelkun, M. D., Jones, H., and Connolly, B. A. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10734-10743). To study the possible role of the dA and T bases within the ATAT sequence, interference studies have been carried out using diethylpyrocarbonate and osmium tetroxide. The methylase bound very strongly to hemimethylated oligonucleotides modified at the second AT, of the ATAT sequence, in the unmethylated strand of the duplex. This probably arises because these modifications facilitate DNA distortion that follows the binding of the nucleic acid to the protein. Oligonucleotides containing modified bases at both the target dA base and its complementary T were used to determine whether this dA methylase flips out its target base in a similar manner to that observed for dC DNA methylases. In binary EcoRV methylase-DNA complexes, analogues that weakened the base pair caused an increase in affinity between the protein and the nucleic acid. In contrast, in ternary EcoRV methylase-DNA-sinefungin (an analogue of the natural co-factor, S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet)) complexes, only small differences in affinity were observed between the normal dA-T base pair and the analogues. These results are almost identical to those seen with DNA dC methylases (Klimasauskas, S., and Roberts R. J. (1995) Nucleic Acid Res. 23, 1388-1395; Yang, S. A., Jiang-Cheng, S., Zingg, J. M., Mi, S., and Jones, P. A. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1380-1387) and support a base-flipping mechanism for DNA dA methylases.

Precluding uracil from DNA

Two enzymes, dUTP pyrophosphatase and uracil-DNA glycosylase, prevent the misincorporation of uracil into the genome in distinct manners. The atomic structures of these proteins complexed with substrate analogs reveal the structural basis for uracil recognition and suggest a novel mechanism of DNA repair.

The role of DNA methylation in cancer genetic and epigenetics

The past few years have seen a wider acceptance of a role for DNA methylation in cancer. This can be attributed to three developments. First, the documentation of the over-representation of mutations at CpG dinucleotides has convincingly implicated DNA methylation in the generation of oncogenic point mutations. The second important advance has been the demonstration of epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes by DNA methylation. The third development has been the utilization of experimental methods to manipulate DNA methylation levels. These studies demonstrate that DNA methylation changes in cancer cells are not mere by-products of malignant transformation, but can play an instrumental role in the cancer process. It seems clear that DNA methylation plays a variety of roles in different cancer types and probably at different stages of oncogenesis. DNA methylation is intricately involved in a wide diversity of cellular processes. Likewise, it appears to exert its influence on the cancer process through a diverse array of mechanisms. It is our task not only to identify these mechanisms, but to determine their relative importance for each stage and type of cancer. Our hope then will be to translate that knowledge into clinical applications.

Chemistry and biology of DNA methyltransferases

Recognition of a specific DNA sequence by a protein is probably the best example of macromolecular interactions leading to various events. It is a prerequisite to understanding the basis of protein-DNA interactions to obtain a better insight into fundamental processes such as transcription, replication, repair, and recombination. DNA methyltransferases with varying sequence specificities provide an excellent model system for understanding the molecular mechanism of specific DNA recognition. Sequence comparison of cloned genes, along with mutational analyses and recent crystallographic studies, have clearly defined the functions of various conserved motifs. These enzymes access their target base in an elegant manner by flipping it out of the DNA double helix. The drastic protein-induced DNA distortion, first reported for HhaI DNA methyltransferase, appears to be a common mechanism employed by various proteins that need to act on bases. A remarkable feature of the catalytic mechanism of DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases is the ability of these enzymes to induce deamination of the target cytosine in the absence of S-adenosyl-L-methionine or its analogs. The enzyme-catalyzed deamination reaction is postulated to be the major cause of mutational hotspots at CpG islands responsible for various human genetic disorders. Methylation of adenine residues in Escherichia coli is known to regulate various processes such as transcription, replication, repair, recombination, transposition, and phage packaging.

The Croonian Lecture, 1996: endogenous damage to DNA

Although DNA is the carrier of stable genetic information, this giant molecule exhibits slow turnover in cells as a consequence of endogenous damage. DNA lesions result from hydrolysis, and from exposure to active oxygen and reactive metabolites. These major forms of damage to the heterocyclic bases and to the DNA backbone structure are now well characterized. Most DNA repair enzymes have apparently evolved to prevent genomic instability caused by endogenous lesions, the only exception being those that counteract ultraviolet light damage inflicted by the sun. Despite the efficiency of DNA repair pathways, some forms of endogenous DNA damage still cause mutagenic alterations and may result in human disease.

Identification of specific carboxyl groups on uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor protein that are required for activity

The bacteriophage PBS2 uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor (Ugi) protein inactivates uracil-DNA glycosylase (Ung) by forming an exceptionally stable protein-protein complex in which Ugi mimics electronegative and structural features of duplex DNA (Beger, R. D., Balasubramanian, S., Bennett, S. E., Mosbaugh, D. W., and Bolton, P. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16840-16847; Mol, C. D., Arvai, A. S., Sanderson, R. J., Slupphaug, G., Kavli, B., Krokan, H. E., Mosbaugh, D. W., and Tainer, J. A. (1995) Cell 82, 701-708). The role of specific carboxylic amino acid residues in forming the Ung.Ugi complex was investigated using selective chemical modification techniques. Ugi treated with carbodiimide and glycine ethyl ester produced five discrete protein species (forms I-V) that were purified and characterized. Analysis by mass spectrometry revealed that Ugi form I escaped protein modification, and forms II-V showed increasing incremental amounts of acyl-glycine ethyl ester adduction. Ugi forms II-V retained their ability to form a Ung.Ugi complex but exhibited a reduced ability to inactivate Escherichia coli Ung, directly reflecting the extent of modification. Competition experiments using modified forms II-V with unmodified Ugi as a competitor protein revealed that unmodified Ugi preferentially formed complex. Furthermore, unmodified Ugi and poly(U) were capable of displacing forms II-V from a preformed Ung.Ugi complex but were unable to displace Ugi form I. The primary sites of acyl-glycine ethyl ester adduction were located in the alpha2-helix of Ugi at Glu-28 and Glu-31. We infer that these two negatively charged amino acids play an important role in mediating a conformational change in Ugi that precipitates the essentially irreversible Ung/Ugi interaction.

A nucleotide-flipping mechanism from the structure of human uracil-DNA glycosylase bound to DNA

Any uracil bases in DNA, a result of either misincorporation or deamination of cytosine, are removed by uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), one of the most efficient and specific of the base-excision DNA-repair enzymes. Crystal structures of human and viral UDGs complexed with free uracil have indicated that the enzyme binds an extrahelical uracil. Such binding of undamaged extrahelical bases has been seen in the structures of two bacterial methyltransferases and bacteriophage T4 endonuclease V. Here we characterize the DNA binding and kinetics of several engineered human UDG mutants and present the crystal structure of one of these, which to our knowledge represents the first structure of any eukaryotic DNA repair enzyme in complex with its damaged, target DNA. Electrostatic orientation along the UDG active site, insertion of an amino acid (residue 272) into the DNA through the minor groove, and compression of the DNA backbone flanking the uracil all result in the flipping-out of the damaged base from the DNA major groove, allowing specific recognition of its phosphate, deoxyribose and uracil moieties. Our structure thus provides a view of a productive complex specific for cleavage of uracil from DNA and also reveals the basis for the enzyme-assisted nucleotide flipping by this critical DNA-repair enzyme.