201
|
Abstract
Vertebrate development requires the formation of multiple cell types from a single genetic blueprint, an extraordinary feat that is guided by the dynamic and finely tuned reprogramming of gene expression. The sophisticated orchestration of gene expression programs is driven primarily by changes in the patterns of covalent chromatin modifications. These epigenetic changes are directed by cis elements, positioned across the genome, which provide docking sites for transcription factors and associated chromatin modifiers. Epigenetic changes impact all aspects of gene regulation, governing association with the machinery that drives transcription, replication, repair and recombination, a regulatory relationship that is dramatically illustrated in developing lymphocytes. The program of somatic rearrangements that assemble antigen receptor genes in precursor B and T cells has proven to be a fertile system for elucidating relationships between the genetic and epigenetic components of gene regulation. This chapter describes our current understanding of the cross-talk between key genetic elements and epigenetic programs during recombination of the Tcrb locus in developing T cells, how each contributes to the regulation of chromatin accessibility at individual DNA targets for recombination, and potential mechanisms that coordinate their actions.
Collapse
|
202
|
Matheson LS, Corcoran AE. Local and global epigenetic regulation of V(D)J recombination. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2011; 356:65-89. [PMID: 21695632 DOI: 10.1007/82_2011_137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Despite using the same Rag recombinase machinery expressed in both lymphocyte lineages, V(D)J recombination of immunoglobulins only occurs in B cells and T cell receptor recombination is confined to T cells. This vital segregation of recombination targets is governed by the coordinated efforts of several epigenetic mechanisms that control both the general chromatin accessibility of these loci to the Rag recombinase, and the movement and synapsis of distal gene segments in these enormous multigene AgR loci, in a lineage and developmental stage-specific manner. These mechanisms operate both locally at individual gene segments and AgR domains, and globally over large distances in the nucleus. Here we will discuss the roles of several epigenetic components that regulate V(D)J recombination of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in B cells, both in the context of the locus itself, and of its 3D nuclear organization, focusing in particular on non-coding RNA transcription. We will also speculate about how several newly described epigenetic mechanisms might impact on AgR regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise S Matheson
- Laboratory of Chromatin and Gene Expression, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
203
|
Subrahmanyam R, Sen R. Epigenetic features that regulate IgH locus recombination and expression. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2011; 356:39-63. [PMID: 21779986 DOI: 10.1007/82_2011_153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Precisely regulated rearrangements that yield imprecise recombination junctions are hallmarks of antigen receptor gene assembly. At the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene locus this is initiated by rearrangement of a D (H) gene segment to a J (H) gene segment to generate DJ(H) junctions, followed by rearrangement of a V (H) gene segment to the DJ(H) junction to generate fully recombined VDJ alleles. In this review we discuss the regulatory features of each step of IgH gene assembly and the role of epigenetic mechanisms in achieving regulatory precision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Subrahmanyam
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
204
|
Giallourakis CC, Franklin A, Guo C, Cheng HL, Yoon HS, Gallagher M, Perlot T, Andzelm M, Murphy AJ, Macdonald LE, Yancopoulos GD, Alt FW. Elements between the IgH variable (V) and diversity (D) clusters influence antisense transcription and lineage-specific V(D)J recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:22207-12. [PMID: 21123744 PMCID: PMC3009784 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1015954107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Ig and T-cell receptor (TCR) variable-region gene exons are assembled from component variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) gene segments during early B and T cell development. The RAG1/2 endonuclease initiates V(D)J recombination by introducing DNA double-strand breaks at borders of the germ-line segments. In mice, the Ig heavy-chain (IgH) locus contains, from 5' to 3', several hundred V(H) gene segments, 13 D segments, and 4 J(H) segments within a several megabase region. In developing B cells, IgH variable-region exon assembly is ordered with D to J(H) rearrangement occurring on both alleles before appendage of a V(H) segment. Also, IgH V(H) to DJ(H) rearrangement does not occur in T cells, even though DJ(H) rearrangements occur at low levels. In these contexts, V(D)J recombination is controlled by modulating substrate gene segment accessibility to RAG1/2 activity. To elucidate control elements, we deleted the 100-kb intergenic region that separates the V(H) and D clusters (generating ΔV(H)-D alleles). In both B and T cells, ΔV(H)-D alleles initiated high-level antisense and, at lower levels, sense transcription from within the downstream D cluster, with antisense transcripts extending into proximal V(H) segments. In developing T lymphocytes, activated germ-line antisense transcription was accompanied by markedly increased IgH D-to-J(H) rearrangement and substantial V(H) to DJ(H) rearrangement of proximal IgH V(H) segments. Thus, the V(H)-D intergenic region, and likely elements within it, can influence silencing of sense and antisense germ-line transcription from the IgH D cluster and thereby influence targeting of V(D)J recombination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosmas C. Giallourakis
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Immune Disease Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; and
| | - Andrew Franklin
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Immune Disease Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Chunguang Guo
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Immune Disease Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Hwei-Ling Cheng
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Immune Disease Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Hye Suk Yoon
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Immune Disease Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Michael Gallagher
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Immune Disease Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Thomas Perlot
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Immune Disease Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Milena Andzelm
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Immune Disease Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | | | | | | | - Frederick W. Alt
- The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Immune Disease Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Lucas JS, Bossen C, Murre C. Transcription and recombination factories: common features? Curr Opin Cell Biol 2010; 23:318-24. [PMID: 21169003 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2010] [Revised: 11/24/2010] [Accepted: 11/29/2010] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
There is now substantial evidence that the eukaryotic nucleus consists of highly organized structures. Among such structures are transcription factories that consist of an ensemble of genes recruited by the RNA polymerase machinery. Here we suggest that antigen receptor variable regions are similarly organized. Specifically, we propose that the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus variable gene segments are anchored to the base of rosettes, wrapping around a cavity that contains the recombination machinery. We suggest that the folding of the chromatin fiber into rosettes underpins a crucial mechanism by which antigen receptor diversity is generated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph S Lucas
- Division of Biological Sciences, 0377 Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
206
|
Subrahmanyam R, Sen R. RAGs' eye view of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene locus. Semin Immunol 2010; 22:337-45. [PMID: 20864355 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2010.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2010] [Accepted: 08/12/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene locus is activated at a precise stage of B lymphocyte development to undergo gene rearrangements that assemble the functional gene. In this review we summarize our current understanding of the chromatin state of the IgH as it appears just prior to the initiation of V(D)J recombination, and the implications of this structure for regulation of recombination. We also examine the role of the intron enhancer, Eμ, in establishing the pre-rearrangement chromatin structure. The emerging picture shows that the IgH locus consists of independently regulated domains, each of which requires multiple levels of epigenetic changes to reach the fully activated state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Subrahmanyam
- Gene Regulation Section, Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 251 Bayview Blvd., Room 06C214, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
207
|
Autoinhibition of DNA cleavage mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 is overcome by an epigenetic signal in V(D)J recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:22487-92. [PMID: 21149691 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014958107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Gene assembly of the variable domain of antigen receptors is initiated by DNA cleavage by the RAG1-RAG2 protein complex at sites flanking V, D, and J gene segments. Double-strand breaks are produced via a single-strand nick that is converted to a hairpin end on coding DNA and a blunt end on the neighboring recombination signal sequence. We demonstrate that the C-terminal regions of purified murine RAG1 (aa 1009-1040) and RAG2 (aa 388-520, including a plant homeodomain [PHD domain]) collaborate to inhibit the hairpinning stage of DNA cleavage. The C-terminal region of RAG2 stabilizes the RAG1/2 heterotetramer but destabilizes the RAG-DNA precleavage complex. This destabilization is reversed by binding of the PHD domain to a histone H3 peptide trimethylated on lysine 4 (H3K4me3). The addition of H3K4me3 likewise alleviates the RAG1/RAG2 C-terminus-mediated inhibition of hairpinning and the PHD-mediated inhibition of transposition activity. Thus a negative regulatory function of the noncore regions of RAG1/2 limits the RAG endonuclease activity in the absence of an activating methylated histone tail bound to the complex.
Collapse
|
208
|
Genome organization influences partner selection for chromosomal rearrangements. Trends Genet 2010; 27:63-71. [PMID: 21144612 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2010] [Revised: 11/02/2010] [Accepted: 11/03/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Chromosomal rearrangements occur as a consequence of the erroneous repair of DNA double-stranded breaks, and often underlie disease. The recurrent detection of specific tumorigenic rearrangements suggests that there is a mechanism behind chromosomal partner selection involving the shape of the genome. With the advent of novel high-throughput approaches, detailed genome integrity and folding maps are becoming available. Integrating these data with knowledge of experimentally induced DNA recombination strongly suggests that partner choice in chromosomal rearrangement primarily follows the three-dimensional conformation of the genome. Local rearrangements are favored over distal and interchromosomal rearrangements. This is seen for neutral rearrangements, but not necessarily for rearrangements that drive oncogenesis. The recurrent detection of tumorigenic rearrangements probably reflects their exceptional capacity to confer growth advantage to the rare cells that contain them. The abundant presence of neutral rearrangements suggests that somatic genome variation is also common in healthy tissue.
Collapse
|
209
|
Abstract
Immune receptor gene expression is regulated by a series of developmental events that modify their accessibility in a locus, cell type, stage and allele-specific manner. This is carried out by a programmed combination of many different molecular mechanisms, including region-wide replication timing, changes in nuclear localization, chromatin contraction, histone modification, nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. These modalities ultimately work by controlling steric interactions between receptor loci and the recombination machinery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yehudit Bergman
- Department of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, The Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
| | | |
Collapse
|
210
|
Osipovich O, Oltz EM. Regulation of antigen receptor gene assembly by genetic-epigenetic crosstalk. Semin Immunol 2010; 22:313-22. [PMID: 20829065 PMCID: PMC2981692 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2010.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2010] [Accepted: 07/08/2010] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Many aspects of gene function are coordinated by changes in the epigenome, which include dynamic revisions of chromatin modifications, genome packaging, subnuclear localization, and chromosome conformation. All of these mechanisms are used by developing lymphocytes to regulate the assembly of functional antigen receptor genes by V(D)J recombination. This somatic rearrangement of the genome must be tightly regulated to ensure proper B and T cell development and to avoid chromosomal translocations that cause lymphoid tumors. V(D)J recombination is controlled by a complex interplay between cis-acting regulatory elements that use transcription factors as liaisons to communicate with epigenetic pathways. Genetic-epigenetic crosstalk is a key strategy employed by precursor lymphocytes to modulate chromatin configurations at Ig and Tcr loci and thereby permit or deny access to a single V(D)J recombinase complex. This article describes our current knowledge of how genetic elements orchestrate crosstalk with epigenetic mechanisms to regulate recombinase accessibility via localized, regional, or long-range changes in chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Osipovich
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Eugene M. Oltz
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
211
|
Degner-Leisso SC, Feeney AJ. Epigenetic and 3-dimensional regulation of V(D)J rearrangement of immunoglobulin genes. Semin Immunol 2010; 22:346-52. [PMID: 20833065 PMCID: PMC2981695 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2010.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2010] [Accepted: 08/12/2010] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
V(D)J recombination is a crucial component of the adaptive immune response, allowing for the production of a diverse antigen receptor repertoire (Ig and TCR). This review will focus on how epigenetic regulation and 3-dimensional (3D) interactions may control V(D)J recombination at Ig loci. The interplay between transcription factors and post-translational modifications at the Igh, Igκ, and Igλ loci will be highlighted. Furthermore, we propose that the spatial organization and epigenetic boundaries of each Ig loci before and during V(D)J recombination may be influenced in part by the CTCF/cohesin complex. Taken together, the many epigenetic and 3D layers of control ensure that Ig loci are only rearranged at appropriate stages of B cell development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie C. Degner-Leisso
- The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Immunology and Microbial Science, IMM-22, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037
| | - Ann J. Feeney
- The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Immunology and Microbial Science, IMM-22, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037
| |
Collapse
|
212
|
Ji Y, Little AJ, Banerjee JK, Hao B, Oltz EM, Krangel MS, Schatz DG. Promoters, enhancers, and transcription target RAG1 binding during V(D)J recombination. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 207:2809-16. [PMID: 21115692 PMCID: PMC3005232 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20101136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
RAG1 binding to TCR gene elements is dictated by transcriptional control elements and by transcription itself; these findings provide direct confirmation of the long-held accessibility model. V(D)J recombination assembles antigen receptor genes in a well-defined order during lymphocyte development. This sequential process has long been understood in the context of the accessibility model, which states that V(D)J recombination is regulated by controlling the ability of the recombination machinery to gain access to its chromosomal substrates. Indeed, many features of “open” chromatin correlate with V(D)J recombination, and promoters and enhancers have been strongly implicated in creating a recombinase-accessible configuration in neighboring chromatin. An important prediction of the accessibility model is that cis-elements and transcription control binding of the recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 proteins to their DNA targets. However, this prediction has not been tested directly. In this study, we use mutant Tcra and Tcrb alleles to demonstrate that enhancers control RAG1 binding globally at Jα or Dβ/Jβ gene segments, that promoters and transcription direct RAG1 binding locally, and that RAG1 binding can be targeted in the absence of RAG2. These findings reveal important features of the genetic mechanisms that regulate RAG binding and provide a direct confirmation of the accessibility model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhong Ji
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
213
|
Deep-sequencing identification of the genomic targets of the cytidine deaminase AID and its cofactor RPA in B lymphocytes. Nat Immunol 2010; 12:62-9. [PMID: 21113164 DOI: 10.1038/ni.1964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 224] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2010] [Accepted: 11/02/2010] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The cytidine deaminase AID hypermutates immunoglobulin genes but can also target oncogenes, leading to tumorigenesis. The extent of AID's promiscuity and its predilection for immunoglobulin genes are unknown. We report here that AID interacted broadly with promoter-proximal sequences associated with stalled polymerases and chromatin-activating marks. In contrast, genomic occupancy of replication protein A (RPA), an AID cofactor, was restricted to immunoglobulin genes. The recruitment of RPA to the immunoglobulin loci was facilitated by phosphorylation of AID at Ser38 and Thr140. We propose that stalled polymerases recruit AID, thereby resulting in low frequencies of hypermutation across the B cell genome. Efficient hypermutation and switch recombination required AID phosphorylation and correlated with recruitment of RPA. Our findings provide a rationale for the oncogenic role of AID in B cell malignancy.
Collapse
|
214
|
The role of mechanistic factors in promoting chromosomal translocations found in lymphoid and other cancers. Adv Immunol 2010; 106:93-133. [PMID: 20728025 DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2776(10)06004-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities, especially chromosomal translocations, are strongly associated with certain subtypes of leukemia, lymphoma and solid tumors. The appearance of particular translocations or associated genomic alterations can be important indicators of disease prognosis, and in some cases, certain translocations may indicate appropriate therapy protocols. To date, most of our knowledge about chromosomal translocations has derived from characterization of the highly selected recurrent translocations found in certain cancers. Until recently, mechanisms that promote or suppress chromosomal translocations, in particular, those responsible for their initiation, have not been addressed. For translocations to occur, two distinct chromosomal loci must be broken, brought together (synapsed) and joined. Here, we discuss recent findings on processes and pathways that influence the initiation of chromosomal translocations, including the generation fo DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) by general factors or in the context of the Lymphocyte-specific V(D)J and IgH class-switch recombination processes. We also discuss the role of spatial proximity of DSBs in the interphase nucleus with respect to how DSBs on different chromosomes are justaposed for joining. In addition, we discuss the DNA DSB response and its role in recognizing and tethering chromosomal DSBs to prevent translocations, as well as potential roles of the classical and alternative DSB end-joining pathways in suppressing or promoting translocations. Finally, we discuss the potential roles of long range regulatory elements, such as the 3'IgH enhancer complex, in promoting the expression of certain translocations that are frequent in lymphomas and, thereby, contributing to their frequent appearance in tumors.
Collapse
|
215
|
Numata M, Saito S, Nagata K. RAG-dependent recombination at cryptic RSSs within TEL–AML1 t(12;21)(p13;q22) chromosomal translocation region. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010; 402:718-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2010] [Accepted: 10/20/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
216
|
Desiderio S. Temporal and spatial regulatory functions of the V(D)J recombinase. Semin Immunol 2010; 22:362-9. [PMID: 21036059 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2010.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2010] [Accepted: 09/09/2010] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
In developing lymphocytes, V(D)J recombination is subject to tight spatial and temporal regulation. An emerging body of evidence indicates that some of these constraints, particularly with respect to locus specificity and cell cycle phase, are enforced by regulatory cues that converge directly on the RAG proteins themselves. Active chromatin is bound by RAG-2 through a specific histone modification that may serve the recombinase as an allosteric activator as well as a docking site. RAG-1 possesses intrinsic histone ubiquitin ligase activity, suggesting that the recombinase not only responds to chromatin modification but is itself able to modify chromatin. The cyclin A/Cdk2 component of the cell cycle clock triggers periodic destruction of RAG-2, thereby restricting V(D)J recombination to the G0/G1 cell cycle phases. These examples illustrate that the RAG proteins, in addition to their direct actions on DNA, are able to detect and respond to intracellular signals, thereby coordinating recombinase activity with intracellular processes such as cell division and transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Desiderio
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics and Institute for Cell Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
217
|
Aster JC, Blacklow SC, Pear WS. Notch signalling in T-cell lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma and other haematological malignancies. J Pathol 2010; 223:262-73. [PMID: 20967796 DOI: 10.1002/path.2789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2010] [Revised: 09/10/2010] [Accepted: 09/16/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Notch receptors participate in a highly conserved signalling pathway that regulates normal development and tissue homeostasis in a context- and dose-dependent manner. Deregulated Notch signalling has been implicated in many diseases, but the clearest example of a pathogenic role is found in T-cell lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma (T-LL), in which the majority of human and murine tumours have acquired mutations that lead to aberrant increases in Notch1 signalling. Remarkably, it appears that the selective pressure for Notch mutations is virtually unique among cancers to T-LL, presumably reflecting a special context-dependent role for Notch in normal T-cell progenitors. Nevertheless, there are some recent reports suggesting that Notch signalling has subtle, yet important roles in other forms of haematological malignancy as well. Here, we review the role of Notch signalling in various blood cancers, focusing on T-LL with an eye towards targeted therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon C Aster
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
218
|
Brady BL, Steinel NC, Bassing CH. Antigen receptor allelic exclusion: an update and reappraisal. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2010; 185:3801-8. [PMID: 20858891 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Most lymphocytes express cell surface Ag receptor chains from single alleles of distinct Ig or TCR loci. Since the identification of Ag receptor allelic exclusion, the importance of this process and the precise molecular mechanisms by which it is achieved have remained enigmatic. This brief review summarizes current knowledge of the extent to which Ig and TCR loci are subject to allelic exclusion. Recent progress in studying and defining mechanistic steps and molecules that may control the monoallelic initiation and subsequent inhibition of V-to-(D)-J recombination is outlined using the mouse TCRβ locus as a model with frequent comparisons to the mouse IgH and Igκ loci. Potential consequences of defects in mechanisms that control Ag receptor allelic exclusion and a reappraisal of the physiologic relevance of this immunologic process also are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna L Brady
- Immunology Graduate Group, Division of Cancer Pathobiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
219
|
Sikes ML, McMillan RE, Bradshaw JM. The center of accessibility: Dβ control of V(D)J recombination. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2010; 58:427-33. [PMID: 20890731 DOI: 10.1007/s00005-010-0101-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2010] [Accepted: 07/23/2010] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Developmental patterning of antigen receptor gene assembly in lymphocyte precursors correlates with decondensation of the chromatin surrounding individual gene segments. Ongoing V(D)J recombination is associated with hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 and the expression of sterile germline transcripts across the region of recombinational accessibility. Likewise, histone acetyltransferase and SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes each appear to be required for recombination, and the PHD-finger of RAG-2 preferentially associates with recombination signal sequence (RSS) chromatin that contains H3 trimethylated on lysine 4. However, the regulatory mechanisms that direct chromatin alteration and rearrangement have proven elusive, due in large part to the interdependency of individual stages in gene activation, our limited understanding of functional significance of changes to the histone code, and the difficulty of modeling recombinational accessibility in existing experimental systems. Examining Tcrb assembly in developing thymocytes, we review the central roles of RSS elements and germline promoters as foci for epigenetic reorganization of recombinationally accessible gene segments in light of recent findings and persistent questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Sikes
- Department of Microbiology, North Carolina State University, 100 Derieux Place, Campus Box 7615, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
220
|
Abstract
Adaptive immunity is mediated through numerous genetic and cellular processes that generate favourable somatic variants of antigen-binding receptors under evolutionary selection pressure by pathogens and other factors. Advances in our understanding of immunity in mammals and other model organisms are revealing the underlying basis and complexity of this remarkable system. Although the evolution of adaptive immunity has been thought to occur by the acquisition of novel molecular capabilities, an increasing amount of information from new model systems suggest that co-option and redirection of pre-existing systems are the main source of innovation. We combine evidence from a wide range of organisms to obtain an integrated view of the origins and patterns of divergence in adaptive immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary W Litman
- Department of Molecular Genetics, All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
221
|
Corcoran AE. The epigenetic role of non-coding RNA transcription and nuclear organization in immunoglobulin repertoire generation. Semin Immunol 2010; 22:353-61. [PMID: 20863715 DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2010.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2010] [Accepted: 08/12/2010] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Within the lymphocyte lineages, restriction of immunoglobulin V(D)J recombination to B cells and T cell receptor (TCR) recombination to T cells is governed by a myriad of epigenetic mechanisms that control the chromatin accessibility of these loci to the Rag recombinase machinery in a lineage and developmental stage-specific manner. These mechanisms operate both locally at individual gene segments, and globally over large chromatin domains in these enormous multigene loci. In this review we will explore the established and emerging roles of three aspects of epigenetic regulation that contribute to large-scale control of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in B cells: non-coding RNA transcription, regulatory elements, and nuclear organization. Recent conceptual and technological advances have produced a paradigm shift in our thinking about how these components regulate gene expression in general and V(D)J recombination in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E Corcoran
- Laboratory of Chromatin and Gene Expression, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Deletion-based mechanisms of Notch1 activation in T-ALL: key roles for RAG recombinase and a conserved internal translational start site in Notch1. Blood 2010; 116:5455-64. [PMID: 20852131 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-286328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Point mutations that trigger ligand-independent proteolysis of the Notch1 ectodomain occur frequently in human T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) but are rare in murine T-ALL, suggesting that other mechanisms account for Notch1 activation in murine tumors. Here we show that most murine T-ALLs harbor Notch1 deletions that fall into 2 types, both leading to ligand-independent Notch1 activation. Type 1 deletions remove exon 1 and the proximal promoter, appear to be RAG-mediated, and are associated with mRNA transcripts that initiate from 3' regions of Notch1. In line with the RAG dependency of these rearrangements, RAG2 binds to the 5' end of Notch1 in normal thymocytes near the deletion breakpoints. Type 2 deletions remove sequences between exon 1 and exons 26 to 28 of Notch1, appear to be RAG-independent, and are associated with transcripts in which exon 1 is spliced out of frame to 3' Notch1 exons. Translation of both types of transcripts initiates at a conserved methionine residue, M1727, which lies within the Notch1 transmembrane domain. Polypeptides initiating at M1727 insert into membranes and are subject to constitutive cleavage by γ-secretase. Thus, like human T-ALL, murine T-ALL is often associated with acquired mutations that cause ligand-independent Notch1 activation.
Collapse
|
223
|
Abstract
V(D)J recombination assembles antigen receptor genes from germline V, D and J segments during lymphocyte development. In αβT-cells, this leads to the subsequent expression of T-cell receptor (TCR) β and α chains. Generally, V(D)J recombination is closely controlled at various levels, including cell-type and cell-stage specificities, order of locus/gene segment recombination, and allele usage to mediate allelic exclusion. Many of these controls rely on the modulation of gene accessibility to the recombination machinery, involving not only biochemical changes in chromatin arrangement and structural modifications of chromosomal organization and positioning, but also the refined composition of the recombinase targets, the so-called recombination signal sequences. Here, we summarize current knowledge regarding the regulation of V(D)J recombination at the Tcrb gene locus, certainly one for which these various levels of control and regulatory components have been most extensively investigated.
Collapse
|
224
|
|