Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review

Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures

Three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus are usually treated surgically. Open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) is the method of choice in younger patients. Anatomic reduction of the tuberosities is crucial to ensure that, in the event of poorly tolerated avascular necrosis of the humeral head, hemiarthroplasty can be performed under optimal conditions. Suboptimal outcomes may occur after ORIF, as less-than-perfect reduction and fixation is poorly tolerated at the shoulder. Preoperative computed tomography must be performed routinely to analyse fragment displacement and comminution, classify the fracture, assess humeral head vitality, and evaluate the mechanical properties of the underlying bone. Fracture reduction relies on principles that are shared by the various available techniques. Reduction of each fragment should be assessed separately. Reduction of the humeral head to the shaft should be performed before reduction of the tuberosities. The fixation technique should ensure stability of the anatomic reduction, with secure fixation of the tuberosities and a minimal risk of material migration into the joint. Here, we provide a detailed discussion of the various techniques, with their advantages and drawbacks, to help surgeons select the method that is most appropriate to each individual patient.

Proximal humeral fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison of two constructs

BACKGROUND

Different options exist for stabilizing proximal humeral fractures. This study compared the mechanical stability of 2 common proximal humeral fixation plates in bending and torsion.

METHODS

Tests were conducted on 40 synthetic and 10 matched pairs of cadaveric humeri (evenly fixed with DePuy S3 proximal humeral plating system [DePuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, IN, USA] and Synthes proximal humerus locking compression plate [Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA]). Half of the humeri were tested by cantilevered bending in flexion, extension, varus, and valgus for 100 cycles of ±5 mm of displacement at 1 mm/s before loading to failure in varus. The other half were tested in torsion for 100 cycles of ±8° of rotational displacement at 1°/s before loading to failure in external rotation.

RESULTS

Peak cyclic loads for synthetic constructs were higher for DePuy plates than Synthes plates in varus and valgus (P < .0001), but a difference was not detected in extension (P > .40) or flexion (P = .0675). Peak cyclic loads for cadaveric constructs showed a significant difference in extension and flexion (Synthes > DePuy, P < .0001) and in varus (DePuy > Synthes, P < .05) but not in valgus (P > .10). Bending stiffness during varus failure testing was higher for DePuy plates than Synthes plates (P < .0001) for synthetic constructs. Regarding torsion of synthetic and cadaveric constructs, DePuy plates experienced higher peak cyclic torques over all cycles in both directions (P < .0001). For synthetic constructs, DePuy plates showed higher torsional stiffness in external failure than Synthes plates (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The DePuy plate was stiffer than the Synthes plate with varus and valgus bending, as well as in torsion. The Synthes plate tended to be stiffer in flexion and extension.

Biomechanics of four techniques for fixation of the four-part humeral head fracture

OBJECTIVE:

To carry out a biomechanical study of four techniques for fixation of four-part humeral head fractures.

METHODS:

The fracture was reproduced in 40 plastic humeri, divided into groups of ten according to the fixation technique, each one employing different fixation resources, in different configurations. The humeral models were mounted on an aluminum scapula, with leather straps simulating the rotator cuff tendons, and submitted to bending and torsion tests in a universal testing machine, using relative stiffness as an evaluation parameter. Assemblies with intact humeri were analyzed for comparison.

RESULTS:

The biomechanical behavior of the fixation techniques varied within a wide range, where the assemblies including the DCP plate and the 4.5mm diameter screws were significantly more rigid than the assemblies with the Kirschner wires and the 3.5mm diameter screws.

CONCLUSION:

The four fixation techniques were able to bear loads compatible with the physiological demand, but those with higher relative stiffness should be preferred for clinical application.

Laboratory investigation

.

Evaluation and management of proximal humerus fractures

Proximal humerus fractures are common injuries, especially among older osteoporotic women. Restoration of function requires a thorough understanding of the neurovascular, musculotendinous, and bony anatomy. This paper addresses the relevant anatomy and highlights various management options, including indication for arthroplasty. In the vast majority of cases, proximal humerus fractures may be treated nonoperatively. In the case of displaced fractures, when surgical intervention may be pursued, numerous constructs have been investigated. Of these, the proximal humerus locking plate is the most widely used. Arthroplasty is generally reserved for comminuted 4-part fractures, head-split fractures, or fractures with significant underlying arthritic changes. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is reserved for patients with a deficient rotator cuff, or highly comminuted tuberosities.

Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the proximal humerus are common injuries. The management, including surgical intervention, of these fractures varies widely. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001 and last updated in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence supporting the various treatment and rehabilitation interventions for proximal humeral fractures.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases, and bibliographies of trial reports. The full search ended in January 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials pertinent to the management of proximal humeral fractures in adults were selected.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two people performed independent study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. Only limited meta-analysis was performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three small randomised trials with a total of 1238 participants were included. Bias in these trials could not be ruled out. Additionally there is a need for caution in interpreting the results of these small trials, which generally do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that any non-statistically significant finding is 'evidence of no effect'.Eight trials evaluated conservative treatment. One trial found an arm sling was generally more comfortable than a less commonly used body bandage. There was some evidence that 'immediate' physiotherapy compared with that delayed until after three weeks of immobilisation resulted in less pain and potentially better recovery in people with undisplaced or other stable fractures. Similarly, there was evidence that mobilisation at one week instead of three weeks alleviated short term pain without compromising long term outcome. Two trials provided some evidence that unsupervised patients could generally achieve a satisfactory outcome when given sufficient instruction for an adequate self-directed exercise programme.Six heterogeneous trials, involving a total of 270 participants with displaced and/or complex fractures, compared surgical versus conservative treatment. Pooled results of patient-reported functional scores at one year from three trials (153 participants) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (standardised mean difference -0.10, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.22; negative results favour surgery). Quality of life based on the EuroQol results scores from three trials (153 participants) showed non-statistically significant differences between the two groups at three time points up to 12 months. However, the pooled EuroQol results at two years (101 participants) from two trials run concurrently from the same centre were significantly in favour of the surgical group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (8/98 versus 5/98; RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.55 to 4.36; 4 trials). Significantly more surgical group patients had additional or secondary surgery (18/112 versus 5/111; RR 3.36, 95% CI 1.33 to 8.49; 5 trials). This is equivalent to an extra operation in one of every nine surgically treated patients.Different methods of surgical management were tested in seven small trials. One trial comparing two types of locking plate versus a locking nail for treating two-part surgical neck fractures found some evidence of better function after plate fixation but also of a higher rate of surgically-related complications. One trial comparing a locking plate versus minimally invasive fixation with distally inserted intramedullary nails found some evidence of a short-term benefit for the nailing group. Compared with hemiarthroplasty, tension-band fixation of severe injuries using wires was associated with a higher re-operation rate in one trial. Two trials found no important differences between 'polyaxial' and 'monaxial' screws combined with locking plate fixation. One trial produced some preliminary evidence that tended to support the use of medial support locking screws in locking plate fixation. One trial found better functional results for one of two types of hemiarthroplasty.Very limited evidence suggested similar outcomes from early versus later mobilisation after either surgical fixation (one trial) or hemiarthroplasty (one trial).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to inform the management of these fractures. Early physiotherapy, without immobilisation, may be sufficient for some types of undisplaced fractures. It remains unclear whether surgery, even for specific fracture types, will produce consistently better long term outcomes but it is likely to be associated with a higher risk of surgery-related complications and requirement for further surgery.There is insufficient evidence to establish what is the best method of surgical treatment, either in terms of the use of different categories of surgical intervention (such as plate versus nail fixation, or hemiarthroplasty versus tension-wire fixation) or different methods of performing an intervention in the same category (such as different methods of plate fixation). There is insufficient evidence to say when to start mobilisation after either surgical fixation or hemiarthroplasty.

Management of displaced surgical neck fractures of the humerus: health related quality of life, functional and radiographic results

INTRODUCTION

There is no controversy about the need for surgical treatment of the displaced surgical neck fractures of the humerus, but there are few studies comparing the results of the three preferred types of surgical treatment. To expand the knowledge needed in decision making, a patient series is reviewed using health related quality of life (HRQoL), functional and radiographic data from patients treated with percutaneous pinning, locking plates or intramedullary nails.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent internal fixation of fractures of the surgical neck of the humerus between 2004 and 2009 (mean follow-up 40.67 ± 17.93 months). Fifty patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (mean age 70.04 ± 13.15 years). Nine had been treated by percutaneous pinning, fifteen with locking plates and twenty-six with intramedullary nails. We compared the results between the three groups of the HRQoL with the EuroQol5D questionnaire; the functional capacity of the operated and non-operated shoulder with the Constant score; and the radiographic result with plain X-rays.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients had achieved fracture healing. The plating and nailing groups had a better fracture reduction compared with the pinning group (p <0.05). The EuroQol-5D did not discriminate between groups (mean 0.65 ± 0.26; p >0.05). The mean Constant score of the K-wire group (47.67 ± 22.42) was lower than those of the plating (82.45 ± 17.69) and nailing groups (72.72 ± 15.96) (p = 0.001), with no differences between plates and nails. There was positive correlation between the EuroQol-5D result and the Constant score (r = 0.490; p <0.005). The fractured shoulder was worse in each item of the Constant score than the non-operated one in patients treated with pins and nails. Patients treated with plates achieved similar results between operated and non-operated shoulder in three items: arm positioning, internal and external rotation. Seventeen patients (six re-operated) had some kind of complication during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with pinning achieved a worse radiographic and Constant score than patients treated with plates or nails. Although we did not find differences between the plating and nailing groups, patients treated with plates got a Constant score more similar to the non-operated shoulder.

Evaluation of the osteoporotic proximal humeral fracture and strategies for structural augmentation during surgical treatment

Fractures of the proximal humerus are relatively common injuries in the elderly population. Given the association between proximal humeral fractures and osteoporosis, elderly patients who sustain these injuries should always undergo a fragility fracture workup. Furthermore, a preoperative assessment of local bone quality can be critical in facilitating decision making regarding surgical and nonsurgical treatment. Modalities for quantifying osteoporosis in the proximal humerus include plain radiography and spiral computed tomography imaging. Optimal management of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures has evolved and may now includes use of locking plates and augmentation with intramedullary fibular grafts, calcium phosphate or sulfate cement, and iliac crest bone graft. This article reviews the demographics of patients who sustain proximal humerus fractures, the appropriate postinjury fragility fracture workup, modalities for quantifying osteoporosis in the proximal humerus, techniques for augmenting fixation of proximal humerus fractures, and the authors' preferred approach to the treatment of these injuries.

Minimally invasive poly-axial screw plating for three-part fractures of the proximal humerus

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the poly-axial locked plating system inserted through a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of three-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Twenty-three patients with a three-part fracture of the proximal humerus treated with a poly-axial locking plate through a percutaneous approach were available for clinical and radiological analysis at a minimum of 2 years follow up (average 36 months; range, 24-54 months). To assess objective and subjective outcomes the Constant Score (CS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were obtained. All complications were recorded. There were 17 women and 6 men, with a mean age of 62 years (range, 18-86). All fractures healed. At final follow up, the mean forward flexion, external rotation and internal rotation were 126°, 44° and L1, respectively; the mean CS was 64 and the mean DASH score was 23. Twelve patients (52%) had a postoperative complication, which included screw cut-out, stiffness and infection. The poly-axial locked plating system through a minimally-invasive approach may be an appropriate treatment for three-part fractures of the proximal humerus and may reduce the biological aggression of conventional plate fixation.

Calcar comminution as prognostic factor of clinical outcome after locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures

OBJECTIVE

In the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, the decision between open fixation and arthroplasty is often difficult. Applicable radiographic prognostic factors would be useful. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of calcar comminution on the clinical and radiologic outcome after locking plate fixation of these fractures.

METHODS

In patients with proximal humeral fractures that were treated by locking plate fixation, fracture morphology and the presence of comminution of the calcar were documented on preoperative radiographs. Follow-up for at least 2 years with radiologic assessment and functional outcome measurements including Constant score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score (DASH), visual analogue scale (VAS) and short form (SF)-36 was performed.

RESULTS

Follow-up examination (50.8±20.6 months) was possible in 74 patients (46 female, 28 male, age 63.0±15.9 years). Mean absolute Constant score (CS abs), CS adapted to age and gender (CS adap), DASH, SSV and VAS were 72.4±14.5, 85.2±17.3%, 15.7±17.3, 80.3±19.6% and 2.1±2.2. Nonunion was present in 1.3%, cut-out in 5.4% and implant failure in 1.3%. Avascular necrosis (AVN) was seen in 12.2%, in three cases >24 months after the initial trauma. In the presence of calcar comminution, the clinical outcome (CS abs, CS adap, SSV and several parameters of SF-36) was significantly impaired, the odds ratio for these patients to have an absolute CS<65 was 4.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-13.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of proximal humeral fractures with locking plate fixation achieves good clinical mid-term results. Calcar comminution is a relevant and easy-to-detect prognostic factor for the functional and subjective outcome in these fractures.

Modification of the Resch procedure

Controversy surrounds the management of displaced three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. The percutaneous Resch technique of stabilisation involves minimal soft-tissue dissection and a reduced risk of stiffness and avascular necrosis. However, it requires a second operation to remove Kirschner wires and the humeral block. We describe a modification of this technique that dispenses with the need for this second operation and relies on a sequential pattern of screw placement. We report the outcome of 32 three- or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated in this way at a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (2 to 8)). There were 14 men and 18 women with a mean age of 56 years (28 to 83). At final follow-up the mean Oxford shoulder scores were 38 (31 to 44) and 39 (31 to 42), and the mean Constant scores were 79 (65 to 92) and 72 (70 to 80) for three- and four-part fractures, respectively. We further analysed the results in patients aged < 60 years with high-energy fractures and those aged ≥ 60 years with osteoporotic fractures. There were no cases of nonunion or avascular necrosis.

The results were good and comparable to those previously reported for the Resch technique and other means of fixation for proximal humeral fractures. We would recommend this modification of the technique for the treatment of displaced three-part and four-part fractures in patients both younger and older than 60 years of age.

Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study

Background

Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen et al. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture rate of 13.7% per year over the past 33 years. Should this trend continue, the fracture rate would triple over the next three decades. The increasing incidence of low-energy fractures raises questions about the optimal treatment in terms of functional outcome, pain, and rehabilitation time, as well as the economical impact. Despite the high incidence and costs of proximal humerus fractures, there is currently no valid scientific evidence for the best treatment method. Several publications, including a Cochrane review outline the need for high-quality, well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Methods/Design

The study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The hypothesis of the trial is that surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures achieves better functional outcome, pain relief, and patient satisfaction compared to conservative treatment. The trial is designed to compare conservative and surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in patients 60 years and older. The trial includes two strata. Stratum I compares surgical treatment with locking plates to conservative treatment for two-part fractures. Stratum II compares multi-fragmented fractures, including three- and four-part fractures. The aim of Stratum II is to compare conservative treatment, surgical treatment with the Philos locking plate, and hemiarthroplasty with an Epoca prosthesis. The primary outcome measure will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the secondary outcome measures will be the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) value, OSS, Constant-Murley Score, VAS, and 15D.

Recruiting time will be 3 years. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period.

Discussion

This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. It gives details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and also ways of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01246167

EVALUATION OF THE COMPLICATIONS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL EXTREMITY OF THE HUMERUS USING A LOCKING PLATE

Objective: To evaluate the complications from surgical treatment using a locking plate among patients with fractures of the proximal extremity of the humerus. Methods: Between July 2004 and December 2009, 56 patients with fractures of the proximal extremity of the humerus were treated using the PHILOS^® plate. There were 19 male patients and 37 female patients, with a mean age of 62 years (range: 30 to 92 years). All the cases had a mean postoperative followup period of 12 months. Thirteen fractures were classified as presenting in two parts, 28 as three, eight as four and seven as epiphyseal fractures. Results: Among the patients operated, 26 were considered to have achieved excellent results, twelve good, ten fair and eight poor, according to the UCLA score. Thirty complications occurred in 20 patients (35.7%), among which the most frequent complication was inadequate reduction of the fracture, which occurred in eight cases. Subacromial impact, caused by the plate, occurred in seven cases, while inadequate fixation occurred in six cases. Other complications such as pseudarthrosis, adhesive capsulitis, avascular necrosis, loss of varus reduction and infection were also seen. Conclusion: The functional results from treating fractures of the proximal extremity of the humerus using a locking plate depended on correct anatomical reduction of the fracture and stable fixation of the implant. Complications still occur frequently, particularly because of intraoperative technical difficulty, fracture severity and possible inexperience of the surgeon.

Benefits and harms of locking plate osteosynthesis in intraarticular (OTA Type C) fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Locking plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures are widely recommended and used, even in complex intraarticular fracture patterns such as AO/OTA Type C fractures. We systematically reviewed clinical studies assessing the benefits and harms of osteosynthesis with angle stable plates in AO/OTA Type C fractures of the proximal humerus.

METHODS

We conducted an iterative search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cinahl, and PEDro in all languages from 1999 to November 2010. Eligible studies should study the outcome for Type C fractures after primary osteosynthesis with locking plate within two weeks of injury, and a follow-up period of six months or more. Patients should be evaluated with the Constant-Murley Score (CS). Two observers extracted data independently.

RESULTS

Twelve studies and 282 Type C fractures were included. Results were categorised according to study type and synthesised qualitatively. No randomised clinical trials were identified. Two comparative, observational studies reported a mean CS of 71 (relative to contralateral shoulder) and 75 (non-adjusted Constant Score) for Type C fractures. For all studies mean non-adjusted CS ranged from 53 to 75. Mean age- and sex-adjusted CS ranged from 60 to 88. Mean CS relative to the contralateral shoulder ranged from 71 to 85. The most common complications were avascular necrosis (range, 4-33%), screw perforations (range, 5-20%), loss of fixation (range, 3-16%), impingement (range, 7-11%) and infections range 4-19%. Reoperation rate ranged from 6 to 44%.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient study designs and unclear reporting preclude safe treatment recommendations. Complication and reoperation rates were unexpected high. Based on the studies included we cannot routinely recommend the use of locking plates in AO/OTA Type C fractures.

Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures

Locking plates are increasingly used to surgically treat proximal humerus fractures. Knowledge of the bone quality of the proximal humerus is important. Studies have shown the medial and dorsal aspects of the proximal humeral head to have the highest bone strength, and this should be exploited by fixation techniques, particularly in elderly patients with osteoporosis. The goals of surgery for proximal humeral fractures should involve minimal soft tissue dissection and achieve anatomic reduction of the head complex with sufficient stability to allow for early shoulder mobilization. This article reviews various treatment options, in particular locking plate fixation. Locking plate fixation is associated with a high complication rate, such as avascular necrosis (7.9%), screw cutout (11.6%), and revision surgery (13.7%). These complications are frequently due to the varus deformation of the humeral head. Strategic screw placement in the humeral head would minimize the possibility of loss of fracture reduction and potential hardware complications. Locking plate fixation is a good surgical option for the management of proximal humerus fractures. Complications can be avoided by using better bone stock and by careful screw placement in the humeral head.

Clinical outcome and complications using a polyaxial locking plate in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures. A reliable system?

INTRODUCTION

The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures (ORIF) is a perpetual challenge to the surgeon. For this reason, the principle of polyaxiality was developed to provide an improved primary stability of the fracture through better anchorage of the screws, especially in osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to present clinical results with the polyaxial locking plate in the operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in order to determine whether the technique of polyaxiality leads to better functional outcome and lower complication rates in comparison to monoaxial plates in the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically with the polyaxial locking Suture Plate™ (Arthrex(®)) between 03/2007 and 06/2009. Fifty-two of the patients (mean age, 69.9 ± 12.1) were included in a radiographical and clinical examination using the Constant score (CS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH).

RESULTS

The follow-up examinations were on average 13.9 ± 4.5 months (10-27 months) after surgical treatment. The mean CS of the patients was 66.0 ± 13.7 points, the age- and gender-related CS was 90.9% ± 20.0% and the mean DASH score was 23.8 ± 19.8 points for the injured side. The patients with a nearly anatomical reduction of their fracture (n = 13) reached a significantly higher CS (75.1 ± 8.5; p = 0.004) and DASH-score (13.6 ± 11.6; p = 0.043) and none of these patients had a complication. The complications were identified in 12 (23.1%) cases, 5 of which involved loss of reduction. All of these 5 cases were lacking of initial medial column support and 4 of which were type C2.3 AO-Classification.

CONCLUSION

The data show that the combination of angular stability with the possibility of variable polyaxial screw direction is a good concept for reduction and fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures, but anatomical reduction and medial support remain important preconditions for a good outcome. However, a significantly lower rate of complications or better clinical outcome than that reported in the literature could not be found.

Predictive factors for functional outcome and failure in angular stable osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus

INTRODUCTION

Angular stable osteosynthesis has become the gold standard in the operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this article is to determine the indications for osteosynthesis versus primary arthroplasty based on clinical and radiological parameters.

METHODS

A total of 368 surgically treated proximal humeral fractures were reviewed. Preoperative X-rays were used to evaluate the displacement and vascularity of the humeral head (according to the Hertel criteria) and the AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) fracture type. Postoperative X-rays were analysed to assess the quality of the reduction, the reconstruction of the medial hinge and the displacement of the tuberosities. Follow-up X-rays were used to evaluate healing progress, the occurrence of avascular necrosis, loss of reduction and implant related failures. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES score) was used to evaluate the functional outcome. Correlations between a set of variables, type of treatment and eventual outcome were verified in both univariate and multivariate settings, with the significance rate set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

In total, 307 shoulders were evaluated. Mean follow-up was 4.3 years and showed a 15.3% failure rate, a 23.8% re-operation rate and a mean ASES score of 75.3. Better results were noted in patients who were younger at the time of surgery. More displaced fractures, AO type C fractures, varus fracture configuration and reduced head vascularity all led to a worse outcome. Anatomical reduction correlated with better results. Articular fractures had better results when treated with a plate.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures remains difficult, with a failure rate of 15.3% and a re-operation rate of 23.8% at 4.3 years. A significantly displaced varus articular fracture in the older patient results in the worst outcome.

Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus

Proximal humeral fractures were managed with primary hemiarthroplasty in 57 patients, 53 women (93%) and 4 men (7%) aged 51–87 years (mean 72.2). The mean follow-up period was 52 months (range 12–98), and the mean Constant score was 59.2 (range 38–76). Patients were very satisfied (n = 19); satisfied (n = 32) or dissatisfied with the outcome (n = 5). One patient required early revision surgery. Surgical treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus with hemiarthroplasty is a safe and effective approach, the outcome of which appears to be related to the quality of the anatomical reconstruction of the tuberosities.

Endosteal strut augment reduces complications associated with proximal humeral locking plates

BACKGROUND

Locking-plate technology has renewed interest in plate fixation for treating proximal humerus fractures. Complications associated with these devices, including loss of reduction, screw cutout, and intra-articular penetration, are frequent. Establishing a second column of support may reduce complications and improve clinical outcome scores.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether addition of an endosteal cortical allograft strut, used as an augment to locking-plate fixation for displaced proximal humerus fractures, would reduce complications and improve clinical outcome scores.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 38 patients treated by this method. All patients were evaluated with serial radiographs, as well as the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Constant-Murley scores. There were seven two-part, 19 three-part, and 12 four-part fractures. The minimum followup was 49 weeks (average, 75 weeks; range, 49-155 weeks).

RESULTS

No patient had intra-articular screw penetration or cutout. No patient had complete osteonecrosis, but one had partial osteonecrosis. The reduction was lost in one patient. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 15 (range, 0-66.4). The mean Constant-Murley score was 87 (range, 51-95).

CONCLUSIONS

Low rates of complication and high clinical outcome scores can be achieved when treating complex proximal humerus fractures with locking-plate fixation and an endosteal strut augment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Path analysis of factors for functional outcome at one year in 463 proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Path analysis methods were used to test the prognostic value of 10 patient-related and treatment-related factors on the 1-year functional outcome of 463 proximal humeral fractures measured using the Constant score. Complex inter-relationships between these factors were also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from a prospective cohort study that included 3 operative groups repaired using nail or plate fixation and 1 nonoperative group. From the available information, various factors potentially having a direct influence on the functional Constant score were identified. The process of creating a hypothetical causal path diagram was undertaken to order the factors in a sequence of associations or cause-and-effect relationships.

RESULTS

Our final multivariable regression model for the 1-year Constant score included the 6 factors of age, sex, treatment, occurrence of intraoperative and local post-treatment complications, and anatomic restoration. Being a woman aged older than 40 years, treated with a locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP), having experienced intraoperative and local post-treatment complications, and varus deformity of more than 30° were negative predictors of the Constant score (ie, poor shoulder function 1 year after treatment initiation). Three factors, the dominant side fractured and the Neer and AO fracture type, showed only significant association on intermediate factors. The presence of concomitant disease did not show any significant direct or indirect effect. A final pathway outlines these associations and inter-relationships.

CONCLUSION

Prevention of local complications, in particular those leading to severe varus deviation, appears essential to improve shoulder function after a proximal humeral fracture.

Comparison of two different locking plates for two-, three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures--results of an international multicentre study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome, quality of restoration, and complication rate after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced or unstable 2-, 3- and 4-part humeral fractures using two different locking plates.

METHODS

The data used in this analysis was prospectively collected in two large multicentre studies in 15 European Level 1 trauma centres. A total of 318 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated with ORIF using either the locking proximal humerus plate (LPHP) or proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS). Outcome measurements included Constant and Neer scores, evaluation of local pain at the fracture site and complications, and radiographic assessment at one year.

RESULTS

At one year, the mean Constant scores (relative to the contralateral shoulder) improved significantly for both groups and were above 80% for 2-, 3-, and 4-part fractures. A significantly shorter surgical time, less pain at the fracture site, and better functional outcome was achieved by PHILOS-treated patients with 2-part fractures throughout the one-year follow-up month and with 3-part fractures at three months (p < 0.05). There was no difference between the treatment outcomes for 4-part fractures, and no difference in the complication rates (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PHILOS and LPHP can be considered as useful implants for ORIF of displaced and unstable proximal humeral fractures. There was a slight advantage of the PHILOS system with regard to operative time and functional outcome, especially for the treatment of 2- and 3-part fractures.

A comparison of parallel and diverging screw angles in the stability of locked plate constructs

We investigated the static and cyclical strength of parallel and angulated locking plate screws using rigid polyurethane foam (0.32 g/cm(3)) and bovine cancellous bone blocks. Custom-made stainless steel plates with two conically threaded screw holes with different angulations (parallel, 10° and 20° divergent) and 5 mm self-tapping locking screws underwent pull-out and cyclical pull and bending tests. The bovine cancellous blocks were only subjected to static pull-out testing. We also performed finite element analysis for the static pull-out test of the parallel and 20° configurations. In both the foam model and the bovine cancellous bone we found the significantly highest pull-out force for the parallel constructs. In the finite element analysis there was a 47% more damage in the 20° divergent constructs than in the parallel configuration. Under cyclical loading, the mean number of cycles to failure was significantly higher for the parallel group, followed by the 10° and 20° divergent configurations. In our laboratory setting we clearly showed the biomechanical disadvantage of a diverging locking screw angle under static and cyclical loading.

Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

Several studies reported high failures rates after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Loss of reduction and screw cut-out are the most common reasons for revision surgery. Several risk factors for failure have been described in the literature. The aim of the present study was to assess risk factors for failure after surgical fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures in a multivariate setup.

METHODS

Two different surgical techniques (PHILOS locking plate and Humerusblock) were used. In the PHILOS group, every kind of postoperative relative movement between the implant and the humeral head or shaft was defined as failure. In the Humerusblock group, postoperative movement between the humeral head and the shaft in terms of angulation or translational displacement was defined as failure. The following parameters were assessed: age, gender, cancellous bone mineral density (BMD) of the humeral head, fracture type, medial metaphyseal comminution, medial metaphyseal head extension, initial angulation of the humeral head in the frontal plane, initial anteversion of the humeral head, medial hinge displacement, maximum displacement of the tuberosities with respect to the head, surgical technique, anatomic reconstruction and restoration of the medial cortical support.

RESULTS

The following parameters were found to have a significant influence on the failure rate: age, local BMD, anatomic reduction, and restoration of the medial cortical support. The failure rate significantly increased with the number of risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative assessment of the local BMD and the patients' biological age as well as intraoperative anatomic reduction and restoration of the medial cortical support are the essentials for successful surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Multifragmentary fracture patterns in old patients with low local BMD are prone for fixation failure. If the surgeon is not able to achieve anatomic reduction and restoration of the medial cortical support intraoperatively in this situation, adjustments such as augmentation or primary arthroplasty should be considered.

Screw depth sounding in proximal humerus fractures to avoid iatrogenic intra-articular penetration

Unstable and displaced proximal humerus fractures remain a treatment challenge. The use of locked plates has improved construct stability, but complication rates remain high. Biomechanical studies have emphasized the importance of anchoring screws in the subchondral bone of the humeral head to improve implant stability. However, the spherical shape of the proximal humerus and the limited tactile sensation of its soft cancellous bone make determining accurate screw length difficult, and reported rates of intraoperative screw penetration are high. Iatrogenic screw penetration, even if recognized and corrected before leaving the operating room, may lead to late failure. We present a simple technique of quickly and safely determining screw length using a blunt-tipped Kirschner wire and instruments found in basic orthopaedic sets.

Locking plate versus nonsurgical treatment for proximal humeral fractures: better midterm outcome with nonsurgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Since its introduction, there has been controversy about the use of locking plates in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Have they really improved the functional outcome after a proximal humeral fracture or should nonsurgical treatment have a more prominent role? In order to evaluate our hypothesis that nonsurgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures should be the first choice of treatment, a matched controlled cohort study was conducted to compare the midterm (>1 year) functional and radiologic outcome of a group of patients treated with a locking plate and a matched group of patients treated nonsurgically. Complications in each group of patients were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Through direct matching, 17 patients (1 bilateral fracture) treated with a locking plate were matched to 18 patients treated nonsurgically. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively to obtain relevant patient related data and fracture type according to Neer classification (i.e. 2-, 3- and 4-part fractures). At the time of clinical follow-up, EQ-5D, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog pain (VAS) pain and VAS satisfaction scores were completed. Active range of motion was tested. New radiographs were made to evaluate fracture healing, complications and, in the locking plate group, the position of the plate and screws.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in the characteristics of the patient groups. A significant difference in range of motion was found in favor of the nonsurgically treated patients. Results of ASES and patient satisfaction scores were also tending toward nonsurgical treatment. Furthermore, the complication rate was higher with locking plate treatment. Patients treated with a locking plate needed significantly more additional treatment on their injured shoulder (P = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

This study's main limitation was the fact that the choice of initial fracture management was based on clinical judgement, as well as patient's fitness for surgery and therefore not randomized. By matching for fracture type this bias was largely overcome. Surgical treatment had a higher complication rate, requiring more additional treatment, which was often related to the initial surgery. Improving surgical technique could possibly lead to better outcomes for the surgically treated patients. In addition to the more favorable outcomes, nonsurgical treatment is also a more cost effective treatment.

CONCLUSION

Nonsurgical treatment should have a more prominent role in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures are common in the setting of osteopenia and osteoporosis and can often be treated nonoperatively. There are few studies that evaluate the long-term outcomes of nonoperative treatment of these fractures. We performed a systematic review of the literature to examine the results of nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

METHODS

The PubMed search engine and EMBASE database were used. Inclusion criteria were: 1) proximal humerus fractures resulting from trauma; 2) age older than 18 years; 3) more than 15 patients in the study; 4) greater than 1 year follow-up; 5) at least one relevant functional outcome score; and 6) a quality outcome score of at least a 5 of 10 according to previously published scoring system.

RESULTS

We identified 12 studies that included 650 patients with a mean age of 65.0 years (range, 51-75 years) and a mean follow-up of 45.7 months (range, 12-120 months). There were 317 one-part fractures, 165 two-part fractures, 137 three-part fractures, and 31 four-part fractures. The rate of radiographic union was 98% and the complication rate 13%. The average range of motion reported in five studies was 139° forward flexion, 48° external rotation, and 52° internal rotation. The average Constant score reported in six studies was 74 (range, 55-81). Varus malunion was the most common complication reported, whereas avascular necrosis was uncommon (13 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that our systematic review of the literature on the nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures demonstrates high rates of radiographic healing, good functional outcomes, and a modest complication rate.

The calcar screw in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures--a case study

BACKGROUND

With new minimally-invasive approaches for angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures, the need for the placement of oblique inferomedial screws ('calcar screw') has increasingly been discussed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of calcar screws on secondary loss of reduction and on the occurrence of complications.

METHODS

Patients with a proximal humeral fracture who underwent angular stable plate fixation between 01/2007 and 07/2009 were included. On AP views of the shoulder, the difference in height between humeral head and the proximal end of the plate were determined postoperatively and at follow-up. Additionally, the occurrence of complications was documented. Patients with calcar screws were assigned to group C+, patients without to group C-.

RESULTS

Follow-up was possible in 60 patients (C+ 6.7 ± 5.6 M/C- 5.0 ± 2.8 M). Humeral head necrosis occurred in 6 (C+, 15.4%) and 3 (C-, 14.3%) cases. Cut-out of the proximal screws was observed in 3 (C+, 7.7%) and 1 (C-, 4.8%) cases. In each group, 1 patient showed delayed union. Implant failure or lesions of the axillary nerve were not observed. In 44 patients, true AP and Neer views were available to measure the head-plate distance. There was a significant loss of reduction in group C- (2.56 ± 2.65 mm) compared to C+ (0.77 ± 1.44 mm; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of calcar screws in the angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures is associated with less secondary loss of reduction by providing inferomedial support. An increased risk for complications could not be shown.

Locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is considerable uncertainty about the optimal treatment of displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Within the last decade, locking plate technology has been considered a breakthrough in the treatment of these complex injuries.

METHODS

We systematically identified and reviewed clinical studies on the benefits and harms after osteosynthesis with locking plates in displaced 4-part fractures.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies with 374 four-part fractures. There were 10 case series, 3 retrospective observational comparative studies, 1 prospective observational comparative study, and no randomized trials. Small studies with a high risk of bias precluded reliable estimates of functional outcome. High rates of complications (16-64%) and reoperations (11-27%) were reported.

INTERPRETATION

The empirical foundation for the value of locking plates in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus is weak. We emphasize the need for well-conducted randomized trials and observational studies.

Evidence for success with locking plates for fragility fractures

Fixation of fragility fractures with plates and screws often results in loss of fixation and need for revision surgery. Locking plates and screw were introduced to improve fixation of fragility fractures and have been in use for a decade. This review was conducted to compile evidence that locking plates and screws improve fixation of fragility fractures. A search of PubMed was performed to identify biomechanical studies as well as clinical series of fragility fractures treated with locking plates. Biomechanics papers had to use models of osteoporotic bone and had to directly compare locking plates with traditional plates. Clinical studies included case series in which locking plates were applied to elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus and periprosthetic distal femur fractures. Most studies are retrospective case series. Locking plates lead to greater stability and higher loads to failure than traditional plates. When applied to proximal humerus fractures, uncomplicated healing occurs in 85% of patients. Constant and Dash scores approach normal values. For distal femoral periprosthetic fractures, union rates of 75% are reported with a malunion rate of 10%. Early evidence suggests that locking plates improve results of treatment of proximal humerus fractures and distal femoral periprosthetic fractures in the elderly. Loss of fixation is associated with failure to achieve stability at the fracture site. Principles of fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone defined prior to the introduction of locking plates should still be applied.

Medial support by fibula bone graft in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures: an in vitro study with synthetic bone

BACKGROUND

Failure to achieve stable fixation with medial support in proximal humeral fractures can result in varus malalignment and cut-through of the proximal screws. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of an intramedullary fibula bone graft on the biomechanical properties of proximal humeral fractures stabilized by angular stable plate fixation in a bone model under cyclic loading.

METHODS

Two fixation techniques were tested in 20 composite analog humeri models. In group F- (n = 10), fractures were fixed by an anatomically formed locking plate system. In group F+ (n = 10), the same fixation system was used with an additional fibular graft model with a length of 6 cm inserted in an intramedullary manner. Active abduction was simulated for 400 cycles by use of a recently established testing setup. Fragment gap distance was measured, and thereby, intercyclic motion, fragment migration, and residual plastic deformation were determined.

RESULTS

The addition of a fibular graft to the fixation plate led to 5 times lower intercyclic motion, 2 times lower fragment migration, and 2 times less residual plastic deformation. Neither screw pullout, cut-through, nor implant failure was observed.

CONCLUSION

Medial support with an intramedullary fibular graft in an angular stable fixation of the proximal humerus in vitro increases overall stiffness of the bone-implant construct and reduces migration of the humeral head fragment. This technique might provide a useful tool in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures, especially when there is medial comminution.

Results of proximal humeral locked plating with supplemental suture fixation of rotator cuff

HYPOTHESIS

This study retrospectively reports the results of 81 patients with proximal humeral fractures that were treated operatively. We hypothesized that treatment of these injuries through a standardized technique of precountored locked plating and supplemental tension band suture fixation would result in improved clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were evaluated with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Clinical assessment was performed postoperatively with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and active range of motion measurements. Radiographic parameters assessed included Neer fracture pattern, fracture union, hardware failure, the presence of avascular necrosis, and medial calcar length and stability. Fractures were classified as 4-part in 14 (17%), 3-part in 41 (51%), and 2-part in 26 (32%).

RESULTS

The average ASES score was 80 (range, 27-100). The final range of motion averaged 131° of anterior elevation and 41° of external rotation. Fracture union was achieved in all patients, and there were no tuberosity failures. Complications included intraarticular screw penetration in 3 (3.7%) and avascular necrosis in 5 (6.2%).

DISCUSSION

Locked plating and supplemental tension band fixation can lead to fracture union and favorable outcomes. Restoration of the medial calcar and supplemental suture fixation may decrease the incidence of hardware-related complications.

Improving fixation of the osteoporotic fracture: the role of locked plating

The use of locking technology has expanded significantly over the last decade. This technology has led to improvements in implant design for fixation in osteoporotic bone and allowed more secure and stable constructs. Locking plates and screws have been helpful in surgical repair of metaphyseal fractures and those with significant comminution and in the elderly. Biomechanically, creating a fixed-angle design leads to stronger constructs and potentially decreases failure rates. The use of this technology must be tempered by awareness of the complications associated with both the technique and implants.

Management of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients with uni- or polyaxial locking osteosynthesis system

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of uni- and polyaxial locking osteosynthesis systems in the management of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients, totally 76 cases were reviewed including 18 cases of two-part (Neer classification), 36 cases of three-part, and 22 cases of four-part fractures.

METHODS

All the patients received open reduction and internal fixation with proximal humerus internal locking osteosynthesis system (PHILOS) or Numelock systems designed for proximal humerus.

RESULTS

Results showed no significant difference between groups considering the Constant-Murley scores assessed at 6 and 12 months, postoperatively. Satisfactory outcomes were achieved in 73.7 and 75.0% of the patients from the PHILOS and Numelock groups, respectively. Complications included four cases of varus malunion, one case of screw cut-out, and another case of avascular necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Both of the PHILOS and Numelock systems showed equally good results considering fixation stability and functional outcomes of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures

PURPOSE

Technique for the fixation of two, three, and four part proximal humerus fractures has rapidly shifted towards the use of specially contoured proximal humerus locking plates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short to medium term functional results and common complications associated with the fixation of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates.

METHODS

The PubMed and EMBASE databases were used to perform a systematic review of the English literature to assess the functional results and complications associated with proximal humerus locking plates. Our inclusion criteria were proximal humerus fracture due to trauma (excluding pathologic fractures), patients greater than 18 years of age, more than 15 patients in the study or subgroup of interest, at least 18 months follow-up, at least one relevant functional outcome score, and quality outcome score of at least 5/10. Studies that did not meet these criteria were excluded. All institutional, author, and journal information was concealed to minimize reviewer bias.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 514 patients met the inclusion criteria. At most recent follow-up patients achieved a mean Constant score of 74 and a mean DASH score of 27. The overall rate of complications was 49% including varus malunion, 33% excluding varus malunion, and reoperation rate was 14%. The most common complications included varus malunion 16%, AVN 10%, screw perforation of the humeral head into the joint 8%, subacromial impingement 6%, and infection 4%.

DISCUSSION

Fixation of proximal humerus fractures with proximal humerus locking plates is associated with a high rate of complications and reoperation. Further study is needed to determine what technical errors and patient characteristics are risk factors for failure of this now common fixation technique.

Complex proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study of 22 cases treated using the "Bilboquet" device

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent improvements in surgical devices, complex proximal humerus fractures internal fixation still encounters frequent mechanical failures.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to confirm that the Bilboquet device (a design mimicking the cup-and-ball game) helps solving mechanical difficulties associated with these fractures internal fixation and to present a simplified version of the original surgical procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

This non-randomised prospective study included 22 fractures in 22 patients, mean age: 70 years. According to the Neer classification there were three-part fractures in seven cases and four-part fractures in 15 cases. Fractures were all reduced and treated by internal fixation in a simplified surgical procedure using the Bilboquet device.

RESULTS

Mean postoperative follow-up was 34 months. The mean Constant score was 66 and the weighted Constant score was 86. Mean active forward elevation was 108° and mean active external rotation was 28°. No per- or postoperative complications occurred. Initial reduction of the tuberosity was incomplete in four cases. Union was obtained in all fractures. There was no secondary tilting of the head, and no migration or pseudarthrosis of the tuberosities. Five patients developed postoperative avascular necrosis of the humeral head.

DISCUSSION

The Bilboquet staple component provides a supporting platform for the entire humeral head area. This peripheral stabilization associated with tension band wiring explains the lack of secondary displacement in these cases. Although the Bilboquet device provides a solution to the mechanical problems of complex fractures of the proximal humerus, it does not solve the problem of secondary avascular necrosis of the humeral head, which occurred in 23% of the patients in this series and in 33% of patients in the four-part fractures subgroup.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (non-randomised prospective study).

Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures are common injuries. The management, including surgical intervention, of these fractures varies widely.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence supporting the various treatment and rehabilitation interventions for proximal humeral fractures.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases, and bibliographies of trial reports. The full search ended in March 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials pertinent to the management of proximal humeral fractures in adults were selected.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two people performed independent study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. Trial heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen small randomised trials with 801 participants were included. Bias in these trials could not be ruled out.Eight trials evaluated conservative treatment. One trial found an arm sling was generally more comfortable than a less commonly used body bandage. There was some evidence that 'immediate' physiotherapy compared with that delayed until after three weeks of immobilisation resulted in less pain and potentially better recovery in people with undisplaced or other stable fractures. Similarly, there was evidence that mobilisation at one week instead of three weeks alleviated short term pain without compromising long term outcome. Two trials provided some evidence that unsupervised patients could generally achieve a satisfactory outcome when given sufficient instruction for an adequate physiotherapy programme.Surgery improved fracture alignment in two trials but was associated with more complications in one trial, and did not result in improved shoulder function. Preliminary data from another trial showed no significant difference in complications, quality of life or costs between plate fixation and conservative treatment. In one trial, hemiarthroplasty resulted in better short-term function with less pain and disability when compared with conservative treatment for severe injuries.Compared with hemiarthroplasty, tension-band fixation of severe injuries using wires was associated with a high re-operation rate in one trial. One trial found better functional results for one type of hemiarthroplasty.Very limited evidence suggested similar outcomes from early versus later mobilisation after either surgical fixation (one trial) or hemiarthroplasty (one trial).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to inform the management of these fractures. Early physiotherapy, without immobilisation, may be sufficient for some types of undisplaced fractures. It is unclear whether surgery, even for specific fracture types, will produce consistently better long term outcomes.