Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer

Dosimetric and anatomic indicators of late rectal toxicity after high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

We seek to identify dosimetric and anatomic indicators of late rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Data from 49 patients sampled from 698 patients treated for clinically localized prostate cancer at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with IMRT to a dose of 81 Gy were analyzed. The end point of the study was late Grade 2 or worse rectal toxicity within 30 months of treatment. Dosimetric analysis was performed on the rectum surface in three dimensions and on two-dimensional dose maps obtained by flattening the rectum surface using a conformal mapping procedure. Several parameters including the percentage and absolute surface area of the rectum irradiated, mean dose as a function of location on the rectum, planning target volume (PTV) size and rectum size were analyzed for correlation to toxicity. Significance was set at p < 0.05 for a two-sided t-test. Correlation between absolute areas irradiated and toxicity was observed on both the rectum surface and flattened rectum. Patients with toxicity also received a significantly higher mean dose to the superior 25% of the rectum surface and 15% of the flattened rectum. PTV volume, PTV height, rectum surface area and average cross-sectional area were significantly larger in patients with toxicity. The conformal mapping procedure has potential utility for evaluating dose to the rectum and risk of toxicity. Late rectal toxicity was related to the irradiation of the upper part of the rectum and also to the absolute area irradiated, PTV size, and rectum size on the planning computed tomography (CT) scan.

Bowel, urinary, and sexual problems among long-term prostate cancer survivors: a population-based study

PURPOSE

To obtain insight into the long-term (5- to 10-year) effects of prostate cancer and treatment on bowel, urinary, and sexual function, we performed a population-based study. Prostate-specific function was compared with an age-matched normative population without prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Through the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry, we selected all men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1994 and 1998 in the southern Netherlands. In total, 964 patients, alive in November 2004, received questionnaire; 780 (81%) responded.

RESULTS

Urinary problems were most common after a prostatectomy; bowel problems were most common after radiotherapy. Compared with an age-matched normative population both urinary and bowel functioning and bother were significantly worse among survivors. Urinary incontinence was reported by 23-48% of survivors compared with 4% of the normative population. Bowel leakage occurred in 5-14% of patients compared with 2% of norms. Erection problems occurred in 40-74% of patients compared with 18% of norms.

CONCLUSIONS

These results form an important contribution to the limited information available on prostate-specific problems in the growing group of long-term prostate cancer survivors. Bowel, urinary, and sexual problems occur more often among long-term survivors compared with a reference group and cannot be explained merely by age. Because these problems persist for many years, urologists should provide patients with adequate information before treatment. After treatment, there should be an appropriate focus on these problems.

Prostate bed localization with image-guided approach using on-board imaging: reporting acute toxicity and implications for radiation therapy planning following prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To report our experience using Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) in patients undergoing post-prostatectomy irradiation.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients were treated with radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). Prostate bed localization was done using image guidance to align surgical clips relative to the reference isocenter on the planning digitally reconstructed radiographs. Assuming surgical clips to be surrogate for prostate bed, daily shifts in their position were calculated after aligning with the bony anatomy. Shifts were recorded in three dimensions. The acute toxicity was measured during and after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

The average (standard deviation) prostate bed motion in anterior-posterior, superior-inferior and left-right directions were: 2.7mm (2.1), 2.4mm (2.1) and 1.0mm (1.7), respectively. The majority of patients experienced only grade 1 symptoms, two patients had grade 2 symptoms and none had grade 3 or higher acute toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily IGRT is recommended for accurate target localization during radiation delivery to improve efficacy of treatment and enhance therapeutic ratio. Larger studies with longer follow-up are necessary to make definitive recommendations regarding magnitude of margin reduction around clinical target volume.

Evidence behind use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review of comparative clinical studies

Since its introduction more than a decade ago, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has spread to most radiotherapy departments worldwide for a wide range of indications. The technique has been rapidly implemented, despite an incomplete understanding of its advantages and weaknesses, the challenges of IMRT planning, delivery, and quality assurance, and the substantially increased cost compared with non-IMRT. Many publications discuss the theoretical advantages of IMRT dose distributions. However, the key question is whether the use of IMRT can be exploited to obtain a clinically relevant advantage over non-modulated external-beam radiation techniques. To investigate which level of evidence supports the routine use of IMRT for various disease sites, we did a review of clinical studies that reported on overall survival, disease-specific survival, quality of life, treatment-induced toxicity, or surrogate endpoints. This review shows evidence of reduced toxicity for various tumour sites by use of IMRT. The findings regarding local control and overall survival are generally inconclusive.

Preliminary results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to report on the clinical outcomes of patients treated at our institution for prostate cancer (PCa) who had been previously diagnosed as Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective study of 14 PCa/HIV patients who were being treated for PCa with external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or a combination of the two. Each patient's prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, CD4 count, and viral load were obtained before the initial radiation treatment and at the time of their most recent follow-up. In addition, 13 of 14 patients completed a quality of life survey with a social worker on staff and were examined by their radiation oncologist to assess the complications after treatment.

RESULTS

Comparing pretreatment data with the data at last follow-up, only 1 patient's PSA level remained above 1.1 ng/mL. The average CD4 count remained stable, increasing from 523 to 577 cells/mm(3), with the lowest final count at 200 cells/mm(3). Viral load increased in only 2 of 14 patients. There were no unusual rectal, urinary, or sexual complications, and no infections related to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on changes in viral load and CD4 count, radiotherapy does not appear to have a long-term negative effect on the immune system. Treatment complications are consistent with HIV-negative patients, giving no evidence that the subset of PCa/HIV patients should be treated differently from PCa patients without HIV when considering radiation therapy. More investigation will be necessary before reliable mortality and morbidity data can be assessed.

Comparison of two treatment approaches for prostate cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with 125I seed-implant brachytherapy or 125I seed-implant brachytherapy alone

The purpose of the present study was to assess the results of two different treatment approaches for clinically localized prostate cancer: intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) followed by I125 seed‐implant brachytherapy and I125 seed‐implant brachytherapy alone. We studied our 30 most recent consecutive patients. The sample population consisted of 15 cases treated with IMRT (50.4 Gy) followed by I125 seed‐implant boost (95 Gy), and 15 cases treated with I125 seed implant only (144 Gy). We analyzed established dosimetric indices and various clinical parameters. In addition, we also evaluated and compared the acute urinary morbidities of the two treatment approaches, as assessed by the international prostate symptom score (IPSS). In our series, acute urinary morbidity was slightly increased with IMRT followed by I125 seed‐implant brachytherapy as compared with I125 seed‐implant brachytherapy alone. In addition, we observed no statistically significant correlation between the IPSS and the maximum or mean urethral dose. The combination of IMRT and seed‐implant brachytherapy presents an alternative opportunity to treat clinically localized prostate cancer. The full potential of the procedure needs to be further investigated.

PACS number: 87.53.Tf

Dose–Volume Comparison of Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

The contrast in dose distribution between proton radiotherapy (RT) and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) is unclear, particularly in regard to critical structures such as the rectum and bladder.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between August and November 2006, the first 10 consecutive patients treated in our Phase II low-risk prostate proton protocol (University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute protocol 0001) were reviewed. The double-scatter proton beam plans used in treatment were analyzed for various dosimetric endpoints. For all plans, each beam dose distribution, angle, smearing, and aperture margin were optimized. IMRT plans were created for all patients and simultaneously analyzed. The IMRT plans were optimized through multiple volume objectives, beam weighting, and individual leaf movement. The patients were treated to 78 Gray-equivalents (GE) in 2-GE fractions with a biologically equivalent dose of 1.1.

RESULTS

All rectal and rectal wall volumes treated to 10-80 GE (percentage of volume receiving 10-80 GE [V(10)-V(80)]) were significantly lower with proton therapy (p < 0.05). The rectal V(50) was reduced from 31.3% +/- 4.1% with IMRT to 14.6% +/- 3.0% with proton therapy for a relative improvement of 53.4% and an absolute benefit of 16.7% (p < 0.001). The mean rectal dose decreased 59% with proton therapy (p < 0.001). For the bladder and bladder wall, proton therapy produced significantly smaller volumes treated to doses of 10-35 GE (p < 0.05) with a nonsignificant advantage demonstrated for the volume receiving < or =60 GE. The bladder V(30) was reduced with proton therapy for a relative improvement of 35.3% and an absolute benefit of 15.1% (p = 0.02). The mean bladder dose decreased 35% with proton therapy (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Compared with IMRT, proton therapy reduced the dose to the dose-limiting normal structures while maintaining excellent planning target volume coverage.

Development of a set of nomograms to predict acute lower gastrointestinal toxicity for prostate cancer 3D-CRT

PURPOSE

To predict acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Subjective Objective Signs Management and Analysis/Late Effect of Normal Tissue (SOMA/LENT) toxicities of the lower gastrointestinal (LGI) syndrome in patients with prostate cancer undergoing three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using a tool (nomogram) that takes into account clinical and dosimetric variables that proved to be significant in the Italian Association for Radiation Oncology (AIRO) Group on Prostate Cancer (AIROPROS) 0102 trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Acute rectal toxicity was scored in 1,132 patients by using both the RTOG/EORTC scoring system and a 10-item self-assessed questionnaire. Correlation between clinical variables/dose-volume histogram constraints and rectal toxicity was investigated by means of multivariate logistic analyses. Multivariate logistic analyses results were used to create nomograms predicting the symptoms of acute LGI syndrome.

RESULTS

Mean rectal dose was a strong predictor of Grade 2-3 RTOG/EORTC acute LGI toxicity (p = 0.0004; odds ratio (OR) = 1.035), together with hemorrhoids (p = 0.02; OR = 1.51), use of anticoagulants/antiaggregants (p = 0.02; OR = 0.63), and androgen deprivation (AD) (p = 0.04; OR = 0.65). Diabetes (p = 0.34; OR = 1.28) and pelvic node irradiation (p = 0.11; OR = 1.56) were significant variables to adjust toxicity prediction. Bleeding was related to hemorrhoids (p = 0.02; OR = 173), AD (p = 0.17; OR = 0.67), and mean rectal dose (p = 0.009; OR = 1.024). Stool frequency was related to seminal vesicle irradiation (p = 0.07; OR = 6.46), AD administered for more than 3 months (p = 0.002; OR = 0.32), and the percent volume of rectum receiving more than 60 Gy (V60Gy) V60 (p = 0.02; OR = 1.02). Severe fecal incontinence depended on seminal vesicle irradiation (p = 0.14; OR = 4.5) and V70 (p = 0.033; OR = 1.029).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this work presents the first set of nomograms available in the literature specific to symptoms of LGI syndrome and provides clinicians with a tailored probability of the specific outcome. Validation of the tool is in progress.

[Organ-confined prostate cancer: treatment with high doses of radioterapy (intensity modulated radiotherapy)]

PURPOSE

To report toxicity and local control in patients with localized prostate cancer, treated with high dose radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 100 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated between june 2003 and may 2006 were reviewed. They received 80 Gy to the target volume with a biphasic technique (3DCRT + IMRT). The median pretreatment PSA was 9. The median follow-up time was 12 months.

RESULTS

Eighteen (18%) developed acute Grade 2 rectal toxicity, and no patient experienced acute grade 3 or higher rectal symptoms. Forty-four (44%) developed acute Grade 2 urinary symptoms while 34% of the patients experienced no GU symptoms (Grade 0) during treatment. Three patients (3%) developed late rectal toxicity grade 2 and eight patients (8%) experienced late urinary toxicity grade 2; any patients experienced more severe symptoms. We recorded biochemical relapse in two patients, both had poor prognostic factors at initial diagnosis of prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The data demonstrate the feasibility and safety of high dose radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer and provide a proof that this method allow safe dose escalation with low severe toxicities to the normal tissues.

Outcomes after extrapleural pneumonectomy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a locally aggressive tumor that is usually fatal. Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) followed by hemithoracic irradiation has shown promise, but local failure remains a significant problem. To improve local control, we have used intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as it allows better dose distribution to regions at risk of recurrence as well as reduced radiation to surrounding organs.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients underwent EPP. At a median interval of 2.5 months from surgery, 63 patients received IMRT (median dose 45 Gy) with curative intent. Chemotherapy was not routinely administered.

RESULTS

Tumors were right sided in 66 patients (66%) and nonepithelioid in 33 (33%). American Joint Committee on Cancer pathology stage was I in 6 patients (6%), II in 7 (7%), III in 72 (72%), and IV (T4) in 15 (15%). Fifty-four patients (54%) had ipsilateral nodal metastases. Perioperative mortality was 8%. Median overall survival (n = 100) was 10.2 months. For patients who received IMRT (n = 63), median overall and 3-year survival was 14.2 months and 20%. Of these, node-negative patients with epithelioid histology (n = 18) had median and 3-year survival of 28 months and 41%. Distant recurrences occurred in 33 of 61 evaluable patients (54%). Eight patients (13%) had local or regional recurrence, 5 of whom also recurred distally. Only 3 patients (5%) had recurrence within the irradiated field.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy after EPP results in excellent local control for malignant pleural mesothelioma; however, distant metastases remain a significant problem and limit survival. This provides a strong rationale for combining aggressive local regimens with systemic therapy.

Practical issues in the implementation of image-guided radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer within a UK department

AIMS

To study the feasibility of using implanted gold seeds in combination with a commercial software system for daily localisation of the prostate gland during conformal radiotherapy, and to assess the effect this may have on departmental workload.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six patients had three gold radio-opaque seeds implanted into the prostate gland before starting a course of radiotherapy. The seeds were identified on daily portal images and an automated online system provided immediate vector analysis of discrepancies between the planned and actual daily position of the intraprostatic seeds. In total, 138 interfractional displacements were analysed. The workload impact for the department was assessed using the basic treatment equivalence model, by comparing measurements of daily treatment session durations with a control group of patients receiving standard conformal radiotherapy, matched for treatment complexity.

RESULTS

No acute complications of seed insertion were observed. A number of developmental issues required solutions to be identified before clinical implementation was possible. The standard deviations of the set-up and organ motion systematic errors in the left-right, superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions were 2.4, 3.0 and 2.5 mm, respectively. The standard deviations of the set-up and organ motion random errors calculated were 2.5, 2.9 and 3.7 mm. The mean treatment session duration with this daily prostate localisation system was increased by 3 min compared with matched controls using standard imaging practice. If all radical prostate patients in our department were to receive image-guided radiotherapy in this way, this would increase machine workload time by 2.2 h/day.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of this image-guided system is feasible. No additional linear accelerator modification is required and standard imaging devices can be used. It would be a useful addition to any department's image-guided radiotherapy developmental strategy.

Optimal starting gantry angles using equiangular-spaced beams with intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer on RTOG 0126: A clinical study of 5 and 7 fields

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of starting gantry angle and number of equiangular-spaced beams for prostate cancer radiotherapy on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0126 protocol using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten localized prostate cancer patients were prescribed to 79.2Gy in 44 fractions. Static IMRT plans using five and seven equiangular-spaced beams were generated. The starting gantry angles were incremented by 5 degrees resulting in 15 (5 beams) and 11 (7 beams) plans per patient. Constant target coverage was ensured for all plans in order to isolate the variation in the rectal and bladder metrics as a function of starting gantry angle.

RESULTS

The variation with starting gantry angle in rectal metrics using 5 beams was statistically significant (p<0.001) with dosimetric importance. The 5-beam rectal V 75Gy and V 70Gy demonstrated a class solution with a characteristic 'W' pattern and two optimal starting gantry angles near 20 degrees and 50 degrees . Statistically insignificant differences were observed for the bladder metrics using 5 beams. There was little dosimetric variation in the rectal and bladder metrics with 7 beams. Nearly equivalent rectal V 75Gy was achieved between 5 optimal equiangular-spaced beams starting at 20 degrees (class solution) and 7 equiangular-spaced beams starting at 0 degrees for most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an optimal starting gantry angle for 5 equiangular-spaced beams, as indicated by a class solution in this study, will facilitate rectal sparing and can produce plans that are equivalent to those employing 7 equiangular-spaced beams.

Intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

This study investigates the enhanced conformality of neutron dose distributions obtainable through the application of intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy (IMNRT) to the treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An in-house algorithm was used to optimize individual segments for IMNRT generated using an organ-at-risk (OAR) avoidance approach. A number of beam orientation schemes were investigated in an attempt to approach an optimum solution. The IMNRT plans were created retrospectively for 5 patients previously treated for prostate adenocarcinoma using fast neutron therapy (FNT), and a comparison of these plans is presented. Dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and plans were evaluated based on percentage volumes of rectum and bladder receiving 95%, 80%, and 50% (V(95), V(80), V(50)) of the prescription dose, and on V(60) for both the femoral heads and GM(muscle) group.

RESULTS

Plans were normalized such that the IMNRT DVHs for prostate and seminal vesicles were nearly identical to those for conventional FNT plans. Use of IMNRT provided reductions in rectum V(95) and V(80) of 10% (2-27%) and 13% (5-28%), respectively, and reductions in bladder V(95) and V(80) of 12% (3-26%) and 4% (7-10%), respectively. The average decrease in V(60) for the femoral heads was 4.5% (1-18%), with no significant change in V(60) for the GM(muscle) group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first analysis of the application of intensity modulation to neutron radiotherapy. The IMNRT technique provides a substantial reduction in normal tissue dose in the treatment of prostate cancer. This reduction should result in a significant clinical advantage for this and other treatment sites.

Pretreatment nomogram predicting ten-year biochemical outcome of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To update our previously published nomogram predicting for biochemical outcome with 10-year data from a larger cohort of patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (RT) or intensity-modulated RT for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

From 1988 to 2004, 2253 patients were treated with three-dimensional conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT for clinical Stage T1-T3 prostate cancer. Prescription doses ranged from 64.8 to 86.4 Gy. The median follow-up time was 7 years. The nomogram was developed using a proportional hazards regression model predicting for the probability of biochemical relapse after RT according to the nadir plus 2 ng/mL definition of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse.

RESULTS

The 10-year PSA relapse-free survival rate was 62%. The nomogram incorporated the following variables to predict likelihood of PSA failure after RT: pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, radiation dose, use of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation, and clinical stage. The concordance index of this long-term nomogram was 0.72.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of biochemical control after three-dimensional conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT for prostate cancer was reasonably accurate and discriminating. The nomogram also provided evidence that long-term biochemical control can be achieved after conformal RT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Analysis of toxicity in patients with high risk prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated pelvic radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated dose escalation to prostate area

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report the treatment-related morbidity in patients with prostate cancer treated with an optimized pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated dose escalation to prostate/prostate bed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2003 and May 2006, 55 patients with localized prostate cancer and >15% risk of lymph node involvement were treated with pelvic IMRT and simultaneous dose escalation to prostate area. Twenty-four patients received a radical radiation therapy program, and the remaining thirty-one patients received a postoperative irradiation as adjuvant treatment or after biochemical or macroscopic local/regional relapse. After a customized immobilization all patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT. On the CT slices CTV1 and CTV2 were delineated. CTV(1) included the prostate and seminal vesicles or prostate bed. CTV(2) consisted of CTV(1) plus pelvic nodes. CTV(1) and CTV(2) were then expanded by 0.5 and 1cm, respectively, to generate the planning target volumes. IMRT treatment plans were generated using commercial inverse planning software. Total doses of 66-80 Gy and 50-59 Gy in 33-40 fractions were prescribed to the prostate area and pelvis, respectively. The worst acute and late rectal, intestinal and GU toxicities during and after treatment were scored according to the EORTC/RTOG scales.

RESULTS

The IMRT dose distribution provided excellent PTV coverage and satisfying sparing of all the organs at risk, with no patient experiencing >grade 2 acute or late toxicities. Patients without acute grade 2 intestinal, rectal, and GU toxicity were 91%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range of 9 to 28 months), late grade 2 toxicity was detected only for rectum, with an actuarial 2-year rate of freedom from G2 rectal bleeding of 92%. (CI 95% 0.83-0.99.)

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic IMRT and simultaneous dose escalation to prostate area is a well-tolerated technique in patients with prostate cancer requiring treatment of pelvic lymph nodes, and seems to be associated with a lower frequency and severity of side effects when compared with conventional techniques reported in other series.

Tomotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma: A report on acute toxicity

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To analyze the impact of Tomotherapy (TOMO) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity in prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 55 consecutively treated TOMO patients were reviewed. Additionally a well-matched group of 43 patients treated with LINAC-based step and shoot IMRT (LINAC) was identified. Acute toxicity was scored according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute toxicity criterion.

RESULTS

The grade 2-3 acute GU toxicity rates for the TOMO vs. LINAC groups were 51% vs. 28% (p=0.001). Acute grade 2 GI toxicity was 25% vs. 40% (p=0.024), with no grade 3 GI toxicity in either group. In univariate analysis, androgen deprivation, prostate volume, pre-treatment urinary toxicity, and prostate dose homogeneity correlated with acute GI and GU toxicity. With multivariate analysis use of Tomotherapy, median bladder dose and bladder dose homogeneity remained significantly correlated with GU toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute GI toxicity for prostate cancer is improved with Tomotherapy at a cost of increased acute GU toxicity possibly due to differences in bladder and prostate dose distribution.

Chronic genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity of prostate cancer patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy with intensity-modulated versus 4-field technique

PURPOSE

To compare chronic GU and GI toxicity of pelvic radiotherapy delivered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus conventional 4-field technique.

METHODS

The records of consecutive prostate cancer patients receiving RT at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 120 days were reviewed; 48 of these patients received a prostate boost preceded by pelvic radiotherapy (PRT), 14 with IMRT (IM-PRT), and 34 with 4-field (4F-PRT). Dosimetric endpoints for the bladder, rectum, composite, and target for the PRT plans were compared using the 2-tailed t test. Late RTOG GU and GI toxicity were compared using the chi test. Ordered logit regression analyses were performed using all major patient, disease, and treatment factors as covariates.

RESULTS

IM-PRT demonstrated superior bladder and rectum dosimetric endpoints over 4F-PRT for the PRT portion of the treatment and for the composite treatment at the expense of higher target inhomogeneity in the PRT portion of the treatment plan. Late GU toxicity was significantly lower in the IM-PRT group (P < 0.001), whereas late GI toxicity was similar in both groups (P = 0.44). When considering a similar follow-up interval in both groups, however, the difference in GU toxicity only reached a trend (P = 0.10). The regression analyses showed that no factor, including IMRT, reached significance in predicting GU or GI toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Use of pelvic IMRT for prostate cancer patients was not associated with reduction of late GI toxicity but was associated with a small reduction of late GU toxicity. This reduction of late GU toxicity warrants further exploration in consortium studies.

Particle therapy in prostate cancer: a review

While dose escalation is proving important to achieve satisfactory long-term outcomes in prostate cancer, the optimal radiation modality to deliver the treatment is still a topic of debate. Charged particle beams can offer improved dose distributions to the target volume as compared to conventional 3D-conformal radiotherapy, with better sparing of surrounding healthy tissues. Exquisite dose distributions, with the fulfillment of dose-volume constraints to normal tissues, however, can also be achieved with photon-based intensity-modulated techniques. This review summarizes the literature on the use of particle therapy in prostate cancer and attempts to put in perspective its relative merits compared to current photon-based radiotherapy.

Influence of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity in the treatment of localized prostate cancer

The objective of this investigation is to compare acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity results of radiotherapy to localized fields delivered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus conventional radiotherapy (ConvRT). The records of 481 consecutive prostate cancer patients receiving RT to localized fields at a single institution were reviewed; 108 received IMRT and 373 received ConvRT. Acute GU and GI toxicity, as defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grading system, were compared using the chi-square test. Ordered logit regression analyses were performed using all major disease and treatment factors as covariates. Acute GU grade 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 toxicity rates were 23%, 40%, 34%, 3%, and 0%, respectively, in the IMRT cohort and 31%, 37%, 30%, 1%, and 1%, respectively, in the ConvRT cohort -- these rates were not significantly different (p=0.118). Acute GI grade 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 toxicity rates were 42%, 37%, 22%, 0%, and 0%, respectively, in the IMRT cohort and 33%, 32%, 35%, 0%, and 0%, respectively, in the ConvRT cohort--this lower toxicity in the IMRT group was significant (p=0.013). The regression analyses showed that only IMRT use (p=0.046) predicted reduction in acute GI toxicity but no factors correlated with acute GU toxicity rate. In conclusion, in our retrospective single-institution analysis, IMRT was not associated with reduction of acute GU toxicity but was associated with a reduction of acute GI toxicity over ConvRT in the treatment of prostate cancer to localized fields.

Dose-dependent pulmonary toxicity after postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of fatal pulmonary events after extrapleural pneumonectomy and hemithoracic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 63 consecutive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy and IMRT at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The endpoints studied were pulmonary-related death (PRD) and non-cancer-related death within 6 months of IMRT.

RESULTS

Of the 63 patients, 23 (37%) had died within 6 months of IMRT (10 of recurrent cancer, 6 of pulmonary causes [pneumonia in 4 and pneumonitis in 2], and 7 of other noncancer causes [pulmonary embolus in 2, sepsis after bronchopleural fistula in 1, and cause unknown but without pulmonary symptoms or recurrent disease in 4]). On univariate analysis, the factors that predicted for PRD were a lower preoperative ejection fraction (p = 0.021), absolute volume of lung spared at 10 Gy (p = 0.025), percentage of lung volume receiving >or=20 Gy (V(20); p = 0.002), and mean lung dose (p = 0.013). On multivariate analysis, only V20 was predictive of PRD (p = 0.017; odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.08) or non-cancer-related death (p = 0.033; odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.45).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have shown that fatal pulmonary toxicities were associated with radiation to the contralateral lung. V20 was the only independent determinant for risk of PRD or non-cancer-related death. The mean V20 of the non-PRD patients was considerably lower than that accepted during standard thoracic radiotherapy, implying that the V20 should be kept as low as possible after extrapleural pneumonectomy.

Intensity modulation with respiratory gating for radiotherapy of the pleural space

We wanted to describe a technique for the implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a real-time position monitor (RPM) respiratory gating system for the treatment of pleural space with intact lung. The technique is illustrated by a case of pediatric osteosarcoma, metastatic to the pleura of the right lung. The patient was simulated in the supine position where a breathing tracer and computed tomography (CT) scans synchronized at end expiration were acquired using the RPM system. The gated CT images were used to define target volumes and critical structures. Right pleural gated IMRT delivered at end expiration was prescribed to a dose of 44 Gy, with 55 Gy delivered to areas of higher risk via simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. IMRT was necessary to avoid exceeding the tolerance of intact lung. Although very good coverage of the target volume was achieved with a shell-shaped dose distribution, dose over the targets was relatively inhomogeneous. Portions of target volumes necessarily intruded into the right lung, the liver, and right kidney, limiting the degree of normal tissue sparing that could be achieved. The radiation doses to critical structures were acceptable and well tolerated. With intact lung, delivering a relatively high dose to the pleura with acceptable doses to surrounding normal tissues using respiratory gated pleural IMRT is feasible. Treatment delivery during a limited part of the respiratory cycle allows for reduced CT target volume motion errors, with reduction in the portion of the planning margin that accounts for respiratory motion, and subsequent increase in the therapeutic ratio.

When should the seminal vesicles be included in the target volume in prostate radiotherapy?

External beam radiotherapy to the prostate and seminal vesicles as a radical treatment for prostate cancer can result in a significant dose being delivered to the rectum. This can be reduced if the target volume includes the prostate only. Using a Medline search, published studies are reviewed to show that the risk of seminal vesicle involvement can be accurately predicted using readily available pre-treatment parameters. We recommend when to exclude the seminal vesicles from a target volume, and the proportion of seminal vesicles that should be included in a target volume in higher risk patients.

Current status of radiotherapy with proton and light ion beams

Several model studies have shown potential clinical advantages with charged particles (protons and light ions) compared with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in many disease sites. The newly developed intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) often yields superior dose distributions to photon IMRT, with the added advantage of a significant reduction in the volume of healthy normal tissues exposed to low-to-medium doses. Initially, the major emphasis in clinical research for proton and light ion therapy was dose escalation for inherently radioresistant tumors, or for lesions adjacent to critical normal structures that constrained the dose that could be safely delivered with conventional x-ray therapy. Since the advent of IMRT the interest in particle therapy has gradually shifted toward protocols aimed at morbidity reduction. Lately the emphasis has mostly been placed on the potential for reduced risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis with protons. Compared with 3D-CRT, a 2-fold increase has been theoretically estimated with the use of IMRT due to the larger integral volumes. In the pediatric setting, due to a higher inherent susceptibility of tissues, the risk could be significant, and the benefits of protons have been strongly emphasized in the literature. There is a significant expansion of particle therapy facilities around the world. Increasing public awareness of the potential benefits of particle therapy and wider accessibility for patients require that treating physicians stay abreast of the clinical indications of this radiotherapy modality. The article reviews the available literature for various disease sites in which particle therapy has traditionally been considered to offer clinical advantages and to highlight current lines of clinical research. The issue of radiation-induced second malignancies is examined in the light of the controversial epidemiological evidence available. The cost-effectiveness of particle therapy is also discussed.

The role of external beam in brachytherapy

In this paper we put forward the claim that the combination of low dose-rate brachytherapy (BRT) and fractionated external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) may, when planned to take advantage of the relative advantages of each of these two modalities, result in enhanced tumor dose with no penalties to organs at risk. The concept of iso-effective dose (IED) serves the role of common currency for fusing BRT and EBRT and, for evaluation purposes, converting back the resulting IED distribution into a biologically equivalent plan delivered by any single modality. If we accept this view, there are further questions that must be answered regarding practical matters. We show how to deal with these questions by describing an actual patient plan.

Effects of multileaf collimator parameters on treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy

In inverse planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the setting of multileaf collimator (MLC) parameters affects the optimization algorithms and dose distribution. We investigated the effects of varying the MLC leaf width, leaf insertion percentage, and leaf increment in treatment planning of IMRT in 3 cancer cases: nasopharynx, esophagus, and prostate. Inverse planning of the 3 cancer cases was performed using the XiO treatment planning system. MLCs with 0.5 and 1.0 cm were used to evaluate the leaf width effect, whereas leaf insertions of 20%, 50%, and 80% were used to demonstrate the effect of leaf insertion percentage, and leaf increments of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 cm were used to study the leaf increment effect. The treatment plans were evaluated by dose profiles, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). The 0.5-cm MLC leaves showed better TCPs and NTCPs than the 1.0-cm leaves in the 3 cancer cases, although the differences were less than 2.5%. For the leaf insertion percentage, the dose profile differences among the 3 levels of increments were minimal, and their differences in TCP and NTCP were extremely small (< 1.5%). The effect of leaf increment was more prominent, dose profile, TCPs, and NTCPs were best for the smallest leaf increment and they deteriorated as the leaf increment increased. Narrower leaves gave slightly better sparing of organs at risk (OAR)s; changing the leaf insertion percentage brought about negligible changes, whereas increasing the leaf increment significantly degraded the treatment plans.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of pelvic lymph nodes in prostate cancer

Evaluation of: Wang-Chesebro A, Xia P, Coleman J, Akazawa C, Roach M 3rd: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with 3D conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 66, 654–662 (2006). A large randomized Phase III trial (RTOG 94–13) demonstrated improved progression-free survival for the irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics compared with treatment of the prostate only in patients with a high risk of lymph node involvement. Recent studies have indicated that the conventional target volume might miss substantial parts of the lymphatic drainage of the prostate. This retrospective planning study compared conventional, 3D-conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the treatment of pelvic lymph nodes. Field-shaping based on bony landmarks was shown to result in inadequate target coverage compared with 3D-conformal and IMRT planning. Regarding sparing of rectum, bladder, small bowl and penile bulb, the IMRT plans were highly superior. In summary, IMRT may result in increased rates of regional control with simultaneously decreased rates of toxicity. Integration of functional imaging into treatment planning and image guidance during treatment is expected to further improve the therapeutic ratio.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: rigid compliance to dose-volume constraints as a warranty of acceptable toxicity?

BACKGROUND

To report the toxicity after intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer, as a sole treatment or after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Between August 2001 and December 2003, 132 patients with prostate cancer were treated with IMRT and 125 were evaluable to acute and late toxicity analysis, after a minimum follow-up time of one year. Clinical and treatment data, including normal tissue dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints, were reviewed. Gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) signs and symptoms were evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scales. Median prescribed dose was 76 Gy. Median follow-up time was of 26.1 months.

RESULTS

From the 125 patients, 73 (58.4%) presented acute Grade 1 or Grade 2 GI and 97 (77.2%) presented acute Grade 1 or Grade 2 GU toxicity. Grade 3 GI acute toxicity occurred in only 2 patients (1.6%) and Grade 3 GU acute toxicity in only 3 patients (2.4%). Regarding Grade 1 and 2 late toxicity, 26 patients (20.8%) and 21 patients (16.8%) presented GI and GU toxicity, respectively. Grade 2 GI late toxicity occurred in 6 patients (4.8%) and Grade 2 GU late toxicity in 4 patients (3.2%). None patient presented any Grade 3 or higher late toxicity. Non-conformity to DVH constraints occurred in only 11.2% of treatment plans. On univariate analysis, no significant risk factor was identified for Grade 2 GI late toxicity, but mean dose delivered to the PTV was associated to higher Grade 2 GU late toxicity (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

IMRT is a well tolerable technique for routine treatment of localized prostate cancer, with short and medium-term acceptable toxicity profiles. According to the data presented here, rigid compliance to DHV constraints might prevent higher incidences of normal tissue complication.

A model-aided segmentation in urethra identification based on an atlas human autopsy image for intensity modulated radiation therapy

In order to protect urethra in radiation therapy of prostate cancer, the urethra must be identified and localized as an organ at risk (OAR) for the inverse treatment planning in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Because the prostatic urethra and its surrounding prostate tissue have similar physical characteristics, such as linear attenuation coefficient and density, it is difficult to distinct the OAR from the target in CT images. To localize the urethra without using contrast agent or additional imaging modalities other than planning CT images, a different approach was developed using a standard atlas of human anatomy image. This paper reports an investigation, in which an adult urethra was modeled based on a human anatomic image. An elastic model was build to account for a uniform tissue deformation of the prostate. This model was then applied to patients to localize their urethras and preliminary results are presented.

Is seminal vesicle implantation with permanent sources possible? A dose–volume histogram analysis in patients undergoing combined 103Pd implantation and external beam radiation for T3c prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Combined brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) is evolving as a successful treatment option for high-risk prostate cancer. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis of the SV was performed in patients with biopsy-positive SV who received implantation of the SV and prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen consecutive patients with high-risk features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > or =10 ng/mL, Gleason score > or = 7, or clinical stage > or = T2b) and a positive SV biopsy were treated with a 103Pd implant of the prostate and SV followed by 45Gy of EBRT. DVHs were generated for the prostate and total SV volume (SVT). In addition, the SV was divided into 3-mm-thick volumes identified as SV1, SV2, SV3, SV4, SV5, and SV6 starting from the junction of the prostate and SV and extending distally. Delivered dose was defined as the D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the organ on DVH).

RESULTS

The median number of seeds implanted into the prostate and the SVT was 59 (41-94) and 9 (4-21), respectively. The median D90 values for the prostate, SVT, SV1, SV2, SV3, SV4, SV5, and SV6 were 103.2 (87.4-137.1), 46.2 (4.0-69.4), 76.0 (31.2-147), 63.4 (25.1-145.9), 49.7 (15.3-118), 27.4 (9.3-135.1), 14.2 (2.3-100.3), and 3.9 (0-61.5) Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of the SV using a real-time intraoperative approach is technically feasible and results in higher doses to the SV than has been reported with implantation of the prostate alone. Although dose distribution in the SV can be variable and unpredictable, these doses, in combination with 45 Gy of EBRT, may be adequate to control disease spread in these organs.

Early clinical outcomes of 3D-conformal radiotherapy using accelerated hyperfractionation without intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of cervical cancer patients unable to undergo conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) treated with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) alone using accelerated hyperfractionation (AHF).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed the records of 7 patients who had received definitive radiotherapy with 3DCRT alone using AHF for cervical cancer between 2002 and 2005. FIGO stage was IB (1), IIB (2), IIIA (1), IIIB (2), and IVA (1). The reason we did not perform ICBT was due to patient refusal. In 1 patient with stage IB, a total dose of 65.4 Gy was delivered by local irradiation (LI) only. In 1 patient with stage IIIA, a total dose of 60 Gy was delivered by LI only. In 5 patients with Stage IIB-IV, a median total dose of 70.8 Gy was delivered by combination of whole pelvic irradiation (median dose of 45 Gy) with LI. Median overall treatment time was 42 days.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for survival patients was 17 months. Out of 7 patients, 6 patients had CR and 1 patient had PR. The response rate was 100%. The 2-year local control rate was 85.7%. Of these patients, 5 are alive without disease and 1 is alive with lung metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our outcomes suggest that 3DCRT using AHF may be a promising as a definitive treatment for cervical cancer when ICBT is not able to be performed.

Radiation therapy for older cancer patients

Cancer is the leading cause of death among the elderly. With the dramatic increase in life expectancy, treatment approach of older cancer patients poses major challenges. There is no consensus on treatment guidelines for elderly cancer patients with significant variability among physicians due to concerns for toxicity. The issue is further complicated by a lack of quality data on age-related issues of cancer management. This review highlights important factors relevant to treatment decision making in older cancer patients with special emphasis on radiation therapy for lung, prostate and breast cancer. The potential benefits of recent innovations and emerging radiotherapeutic technologies and their application to elderly cancer patients is also presented.

Treatments of exceptionally large prostate cancer patients with low-energy intensity-modulated photons

An inverse planning technique using 6‐MV intensity‐modulated photon beams was developed for treating large‐size patients with prostate cancer. Comparisons of treatment plans using 6‐MV and 18‐MV intensity‐modulated beams were carried out for a cohort of 10 patient cases. For these cases, we analyzed the dependence of plan quality on the beam energies. We found that 6‐MV beams resulted in plans equivalent to those for 18‐MV beams both for targets and for critical structures such as the rectum and bladder. The differences between the plans in the integral dose and the mean dose to the normal tissue surrounding the target were found to be small, in contrast to those for 3D conformal plans. Our findings showed that the low entrance dose of the high‐energy photon beams is mostly compensated by the high exit dose for even exceptionally large patients. In conclusion, 6‐MV intensity‐modulated beams are a feasible choice for treating large‐size patients with prostate cancer, provided that proper inverse planning techniques are adopted.

PACS number: 87.50.Gi, 87.53.Tf

Whole-pelvis, “mini-pelvis,” or prostate-only external beam radiotherapy after neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy in patients treated in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413 trial

PURPOSE

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9413 trial demonstrated a better progression-free survival (PFS) with whole-pelvis (WP) radiotherapy (RT) compared with prostate-only (PO) RT. This secondary analysis was undertaken to determine whether "mini-pelvis" (MP; defined as > or = 10 x 11 cm but < 11 x 11 cm) RT resulted in progression-free survival (PFS) comparable to that of WP RT. To avoid a timing bias, this analysis was limited to patients receiving neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy (N&CHT) in Arms 1 and 2 of the study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients had a risk of lymph node (LN) involvement > 15%. Neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy (N&CHT) was administered 2 months before and during RT for 4 months. From April 1, 1995, to June 1, 1999, a group of 325 patients were randomized to WP RT + N&CHT and another group of 324 patients were randomized to receive PO RT + N&CHT. Patients randomized to PO RT were dichotomized by median field size (10 x 11 cm), with the larger field considered an "MP" field and the smaller a PO field.

RESULTS

The median PFS was 5.2, 3.7, and 2.9 years for WP, MP, and PO fields, respectively (p = 0.02). The 7-year PFS was 40%, 35%, and 27% for patients treated to WP, MP, and PO fields, respectively. There was no association between field size and late Grade 3+ genitourinary toxicity but late Grade 3+ gastrointestinal RT complications correlated with increasing field size.

CONCLUSIONS

This subset analysis demonstrates that RT field size has a major impact on PFS, and the findings support comprehensive nodal treatment in patients with a risk of LN involvement of > 15%.

Use of benchmark dose–volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate our own benchmark dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of bladder and rectum for both conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and to evaluate quantitatively the benefits of using IMRT vs. 3D-CRT in treating localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During the implementation of IMRT for prostate cancer, our policy was to plan each patient with both 3D-CRT and IMRT. This study included 31 patients with T1b to T2c localized prostate cancer, for whom we completed double-planning using both 3D-CRT and IMRT techniques. The target volumes included prostate, either with or without proximal seminal vesicles. Bladder and rectum DVH data were summarized to obtain an average DVH for each technique and then compared using two-tailed paired t test analysis.

RESULTS

For 3D-CRT our bladder doses were as follows: mean 28.8 Gy, v60 16.4%, v70 10.9%; rectal doses were: mean 39.3 Gy, v60 21.8%, v70 13.6%. IMRT plans resulted in similar mean dose values: bladder 26.4 Gy, rectum 34.9 Gy, but lower values of v70 for the bladder (7.8%) and rectum (9.3%). These benchmark DVHs have resulted in a critical evaluation of our 3D-CRT techniques over time.

CONCLUSION

Our institution has developed benchmark DVHs for bladder and rectum based on our clinical experience with 3D-CRT and IMRT. We use these standards as well as differences in individual cases to make decisions on whether patients may benefit from IMRT treatment rather than 3D-CRT.

Long-term outcome of high dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We report on the long-term results and late toxicity outcomes of high dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2000 a total of 561 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy. All patients were treated to a dose of 81 Gy prescribed to the planning target volume. Prostate specific antigen relapse was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus and Houston definitions (absolute nadir plus 2 ng/ml dated at the call). Median followup was 7 years (range 5 to 9).

RESULTS

The 8-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival rates for patients in favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk groups according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition were 85%, 76% and 72%, respectively (p <0.025). The 8-year actuarial prostate specific antigen relapse-free survival rates for patients in favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk groups according to the Houston definition were 89%, 78% and 67%, respectively (p = 0.0004). The 8-year actuarial likelihood of grade 2 rectal bleeding was 1.6%. Three patients (0.1%) experienced grade 3 rectal toxicity requiring either 1 or more transfusions or a laser cauterization procedure. No grade 4 rectal complications have been observed. The 8-year likelihood of late grade 2 and 3 (urethral strictures) urinary toxicities were 9% and 3%, respectively. Among patients who were potent before intensity modulated radiation therapy, erectile dysfunction developed in 49%. The cause specific survival outcomes for favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk cases were 100%, 96% and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These long-term results confirm our previous observations regarding the safety of high dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Despite the application of high radiation doses, the incidence of rectal bleeding at 8 years was less than 2%. Despite the increased conformality of the dose distribution associated with intensity modulated radiation therapy, excellent long-term tumor control outcomes were achieved.

The Clinical Application of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is a delivery system that, when coupled with a treatment-planning optimization system, presents the opportunity to conform the dose to the target better than 3-dimensional conformal therapy, particularly in the case of concave targets. Appropriate clinical applications of this technology to challenging patient treatment scenarios requires careful consideration of issues related to target volume-dose heterogeneity and the influence of patient setup uncertainties. These issues are reviewed and illustrated. To date, clinical reports of these treatments for prostate and head and neck cancers have the most mature data. Those results are summarized here. Future applications of this technology can be expected to take careful, considered advantage of this technology to further rearrange dose distributions across target volumes to produce an integrated overall gain in treatment objectives. However, these innovative applications need to be approached with caution, preferably in prospective clinical trials that would help determine if the hypothetical clinical benefits are in fact realizable.

Comparison of late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity of prostate cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated versus conventional radiotherapy using localized fields

To compare late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) to localized fields for prostate cancer delivered using intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) versus conventional RT (ConvRT). The records of 461 patients were reviewed; 355 patients received IMRT and 106 received ConvRT. Late GU and GI toxicity were compared. Late GU toxicity rates were not significantly different (P=0.166); however, late GI toxicity rates were lower with IMRT (P=0.001). Regression analyses demonstrated that only IMRT use (P=0.006) predicted reduction in late GI toxicity but no factors correlated with late GU toxicity. IMRT did not influence late GU toxicity but was associated with a reduction of late GI toxicity over ConvRT.