Interferon-alpha 2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C after liver transplantation: a randomized study

Treatment of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

This article summarizes the current therapies, with particular emphasis on antiviral therapy. Because these alternatives have substantial limitations, pretransplant or early post-transplant recognition of patients with high risk of severe post-transplantation outcome is desirable to target these patients for intervention. Alternatively, the implementation of measures aimed at reducing or avoiding factors known to be associated with an aggressive recurrence is an additional strategy that needs to be explored.

Early hepatic stellate cell activation predicts severe hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Only a subset of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients develop progressive hepatic fibrosis after liver transplantation (LT). Hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation is a pivotal step in hepatic fibrosis and precedes clinically apparent fibrosis. We determined whether early HSC activation, measured in 4-month protocol post-LT biopsies, is predictive of subsequent development of more histologically severe recurrence of HCV. Early (4 month) post-LT HSC activation, as measured by alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) staining, was determined in liver biopsies from recipients with severe (fibrosis score > or = 2, n = 13) and with mild (fibrosis score of 0, n = 13) recurrence of HCV at one-year post-LT. Immunohistochemical staining for alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) was used to generate HSC activation scores (regional and total). Total HSC activation scores at 4 months were similar in patients with severe and mild HCV recurrence (3.9 +/- 2.0 vs. 2.7 +/- 2.2, P = 0.2). Regional HSC activation, assessed as parenchymal (zones 1, 2, and 3) or mesenchymal (portal tracts and fibrous septa), was different between the study groups, with higher mesenchymal scores predictive of progression. No patients in the mild recurrence group had detectable mesenchymal alpha-SMA staining vs. 46% (6/13) of patients with severe recurrence (P < 0.01). Mesenchymal activation of HSC had a specificity and positive predictive value of 100% for development of progressive fibrosis in liver allografts of patients with hepatitis C. In conclusion, early activation of mesenchymal HSCs is a marker for progressive fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C post-LT and may help select patients who would benefit from HCV or HSC-targeted therapy.

Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Reinfection after Liver Transplantation

Most liver transplant recipients become reinfected with hepatitis C virus after OLT followed by allograft dysfunction, transplant cirrhosis and graft failure in a significant proportion of patients. Both in the pre-emptive prophylactic setting and in the treatment setting sustained virological response rates are poor compared to the precirrhotic hepatitis state. Patients with significant hepatitis should be always treated before developing cirrhosis or even with early cirrhosis. After transplantation pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin is the most successful treatment opportunity to date, however the best time point and treatment duration as well as doses for pegylated interferons and rebavirin have to be defined.

Hepatitis C and liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a life-saving therapy to correct liver failure, portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma arising from hepatitis C infection. But despite the successful use of living donors and improvements in immunosuppression and antiviral therapy, organ demand continues to outstrip supply and recurrent hepatitis C with accelerated progression to cirrhosis of the graft is a frequent cause of graft loss and the need for retransplantation. Appropriate selection of candidates and timing of transplantation, coupled with better pre- and post-transplant antiviral therapy, are needed to improve outcomes.

Amantadine in treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection?

SUMMARY

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) continues to be an important and growing challenge. As the response rate to FDA-approved treatment improved over the past decade, we are facing increasing number of difficult-to-treat patients such as those who have failed prior anti-viral therapy. The role of amantadine in the treatment of CHC remains unclear. Studies thus far have produced conflicting results, and type II error could not be excluded. This review summarized results published in the literature from 1997 to 2003, and reviewed the existing questions and controversies regarding the use of amantadine. Current literature suggests that amantadine is ineffective as monotherapy. Amantadine increased the sustained virologic response of certain treatment naïve patients when used in combination with interferon, and may be effective as an adjunct to interferon-based combination therapy in some patients who have failed or relapsed on prior therapy. Factors such as small sample size, patient characteristics, and differences in treatment protocols including amantadine preparation and duration of therapy might explain the conflicting observations of various studies. Further investigations are needed to define optimal dosing and formulation of amantadine, and its appropriate role in management of CHC infection.

Ribavirin Levels in Post Liver Transplant Patients Treated for Recurrent Hepatitis C Viral Infection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation (LTx) in the United States. Ribavirin with pegylated interferon is the only treatment option for HCV recurrence in post-LTx patients. In clinical practice, for more than 50% of patients, ribavirin dose needs to be modified.

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine the role of ribavirin level and its relevance in the management of post-LTx patients in terms of renal dysfunction, efficacy, toxicity, and potential drug interactions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four blood samples were available from 22 post-LTx patients. Ribavirin concentrations in plasma (all samples) and whole blood concentrations (16 samples) were examined. The dose of ribavirin ranged from 400 mg/d to 1000 mg/d, but concentrations were normalized to 800 mg/d.

RESULTS

There was a wide variation in plasma concentration of ribavirin, ranging from 1.8 to 122.1 mg/mL. The concentrations were similar in whole blood and plasma. Dose-normalized concentration with creatinine clearance below 70 mL/min were significantly higher when compared with creatinine clearance above 70 mL/min (P = .015). Eleven patients required erythropoietin; their mean ribavirin dosage was higher but mean ribavirin concentration was lower compared to the 11 patients who did not require erythropoietin factor. There was no difference in mean ribavirin concentration in patients who cleared the virus (n = 7) compared and who did not clear the virus (n = 9). Three patients were on nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) had significantly higher concentration (mean 87.1 microg/mL) compared to those who did not receive NRTI (mean 34.4 microg/mL, P = .00)

CONCLUSION

Ribavirin concentration in plasma and whole blood were similar, with a wide variation. Patients with impaired renal function and those who were on NRTI had significantly higher concentrations of ribavirin. The ribavirin concentrations did not predict either the clearance of HCV RNA or the need for erythropoitin factor.

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine on early recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on incidence, delay, severity and clinical course of early recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT). A total of 21 hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients after LT were prospectively enrolled in this study. All of them received a quadruple induction cyclosporine A (CsA)-based immunosuppression, augmented by MMF (n=12) or by azathioprine (n=9, AZA). MMF tended to delay recurrent disease (50+/-35 versus 35+/-35 weeks, P=0.5) with significantly lower levels of aminotransferases (P<0.05). Furthermore, patients under MMF revealed less severe allograft fibrosis at disease recurrence (stage of fibrosis: 1.5+/-0.5 versus 2.2+/-1.2; P=0.07). But stage of fibrosis significantly increased in the MMF-group (P<0.05) during 6 months of antiviral treatment. Three patients in the MMF-group and none of the controls suffered from severe fibrosing cholestatic recurrent hepatitis C. Initial post-LT administration of MMF tended to delay recurrent hepatitis C and to limit initial HCV-related biochemical and morphological graft dysfunction. But during clinical follow-up, its immunosuppressive capabilities exceeded possible antiviral properties, finally leading to significant progression of graft fibrosis. Thus, concomitant dose reduction of other basic immunosuppressants might be useful in this clinical setting.

A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of human hepatitis C immune globulin (Civacir) in liver transplant recipients

Chronic hepatitis C is the most common indication for liver transplantation, but viral recurrence is universal and progressive graft injury occurs in most recipients. Our aim was to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antiviral effects of high doses of a human hepatitis C antibody enriched immune globulin product (HCIG) in patients undergoing liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial conducted at 4 transplant centers in the United States. A total of 18 patients with chronic hepatitis C, who underwent liver transplantation, were randomized to receive low-dose HCIG (75 mg/kg) or high-dose HCIG (200 mg/kg), or no treatment. A total of 17 infusions of HCIG were administered in each treated patient over 14 weeks using a time-dependent dosing strategy based on the PK of anti-hepatitis B immune globulin in liver transplant recipients. Hepatitis C virus levels, liver enzymes, and liver biopsies were obtained serially throughout the study period. PK profiles of HCV antibodies were determined on days 4, 10, and 98. HCIG infusions were safe and tolerated. The infusion rate could not be maximized because of symptoms for 18% to 30% of the doses. The half-life of HCIG was extremely short immediately after transplantation but was gradually prolonged. In the high-dose group, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels normalized in most subjects and no patient developed hepatic fibrosis. However, serum HCV RNA levels were not suppressed at either dose. In conclusion, HCIG, an anti-HCV enriched immune globulin product, appears to be safe in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation. Further studies are required to determine whether the drug has beneficial effects in this group of patients.

Successful treatment of hepatitis C reinfection with interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a virtually universal occurrence, and a significant proportion of patients develop chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of interferon (IFN)-alpha2b plus ribavirin (RIBA) in the treatment of recurrent HCV after OLT over the long term.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with recurrent HCV infection (positive serum HCV RNA, elevated serum aminotransferases, histological activity) were started on IFN-alpha2b (3-6 million units administered subcutaneously three times a week) plus RIBA (800-1200 mg/day) 18+/-5 months after OLT. HCV RNA was determined 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months after initiation of treatment. Liver biopsy was performed before and after therapy. The patients were followed up for a mean of 33+/-5 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (87%) were treated for at least 6 months and nine patients (60%) for 12 months. After 3 months, 11 patients (73%) were free from HCV RNA (<50 copies/ml); the virological end-of-treatment response was 67%. Five patients (33%) remained HCV RNA-negative 6 months posttreatment (sustained response (SR)). During the follow-up period, four patients (27%) died of liver failure, recurrent HCV after virological response, or HCC. The histological activity index improved significantly for both inflammatory activity and fibrosis, from 8.8 to 4.7 and from 7.3 to 4.8, respectively. In none of the patients were signs of rejection observed.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with IFN and RIBA in transplanted patients with chronic hepatitis C is an effective treatment that results in a high virological SR rate. It is well tolerated and leads to an improvement in histological outcome.

Treatment of hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus is a leading cause of chronic liver disease, with over 170 million people infected worldwide. It is also the leading indication for liver transplantation. Complications from chronic hepatitis C infection include cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma. As a result, treatment strategies to prevent such complications have been widely researched, although many questions remain unanswered. To date, the standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection is the combination of peginterferon and ribavirin. Treatment strategies differ based on factors such as genotype and liver biopsy results. Other strategies must be considered for special groups, such as patients with acute hepatitis C infection, hepatitis C/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection, and prior nonresponse to interferon or relapse after its use. The goal of therapy is to achieve a sustained virologic response (ie, no detectable hepatitis C ribonucleic acid 6 months after completion of therapy). The substantial adverse effects associated with both interferon alfa and ribavirin often make it difficult for patients to continue with their therapies.

Benefit of sustained virological response to combination therapy on graft survival of liver transplanted patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis C

Recurrent hepatitis C infection is an important cause of progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis and graft loss after liver transplantation. Treatment for post-transplant recurrence results in sustained virological response (SVR) in up to 30% of cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of SVR on patients and graft survival. Thirty-four patients with an SVR to IFN-ribavirin were included. Forty-six nonresponders to the combination formed the control group. Follow-up data were recorded every 6 months and included HCV RNA, and the occurrence of clinical problems (cirrhosis, decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, death). A graft biopsy was performed every year. The mean follow-up duration was 52 months in responders and 57 months in nonresponders. Two patients died in each group of patients. Two patients with SVR developed late virological relapse. Fibrosis decreased in 38% of patients with SVR, remained stable in 44% and worsened in 18%. In contrast, fibrosis increased in the majority of nonresponder patients (74%, p<0.001). At the end of follow-up, no patient without cirrhosis at inclusion developed cirrhosis of the graft versus 9 among nonresponder patients (p=0.009). No difference in patient survival was observed in the two groups. In conclusion, this study shows that HCV eradication has a positive impact on graft survival.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States and Europe, and more than 20,000 patients worldwide have undergone transplantation for complications of chronic hepatitis C. In North America, HCV accounts for 15% to 50% of the liver transplants performed in United States transplant programs. To maximize the long-term survival of liver transplant recipients who have HCV infection, eradication of infection is the ultimate goal. Pretransplant antiviral therapy with the goal of achieving viral eradication before transplantation is a consideration in some patients, especially those who have mildly decompensated liver disease. This article focuses on the management of liver transplant recipients who have HCV infection at the time of transplantation. Prophylactic and preemptive therapies, as well as treatment of established recurrent disease, are the strategies reviewed.

Combined treatment with pegylated interferon (alpha-2b) and ribavirin in the acute phase of hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The efficacy and safety of treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2b (Peg-Intron, 1.5 microg/kg) and ribavirin (400-800 mg) in the acute phase of recurrent HCV after LT is presented.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (17 men) transplanted for HCV-associated cirrhosis (genotype 1b) were treated for at least 6 months and compared with 24 consecutive transplant patients (16 men) without antiviral therapy (controls).

RESULTS

At completion of treatment, 14/24 treated patients (58%) achieved HCV-RNA negativity, compared to none of controls (P<0.0001). Sustained virological response (SVR) occurred in 8/23 treated patients (34.7%) who reached week 24 after treatment and none of controls (P<0.005). At 12 weeks after treatment, 15/24 patients (62.5%) had an early virological response (EVR) (seven tested HCV-RNA negative). SVR was associated with absence of corticosteroid bolus administration (P=0.01), presence of EVR (P=0.002) and absence of cytomegalovirus infection (P=0.001). Haematological adverse effects included anaemia, 17/24 cases (71%) and leukopenia, 23/24 cases (96%). One patient presented mild acute rejection that resolved by adjusting immunosuppressive dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the acute phase of HCV reinfection yielded an EVR of 62.5% and a SVR of 34.7%. The combination was safe, with a low rate of therapy withdrawal.

Liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver transplantation continues to change as we further define appropriate criteria for allocation and utilization of this scarce resource. The following review highlights new trends and ideas in this evolving field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the model for end-stage renal disease (MELD) scoring system appears to fairly accurately predict mortality while waiting for transplant, the system may be less accurate in predicting outcomes following transplantation. MELD scores offer an additional advantage to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), bringing them to transplant sooner with overall better survivals. However, despite its advantages, the MELD scoring system does not resolve the disparity in the allocation of organs between various organ procurement organizations. Several variables appear to affect patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation. Selection of appropriate donors appears to be important when transplanting patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection as increasing donor age is associated with poorer outcomes. However, the controversy over whether a living donor liver transplant (LDLT) results in poorer outcomes in HCV infected patients remains. Post-transplant medical treatment of HCV may result in both a sustained virologic response and improved histology. With improved overall survival in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant (OLT), increasing attention has been focused on the medical complications following transplant. Identifying specific contributing factors in the development of renal dysfunction and devising strategies to prevent its occurrence are critical to further improvements in outcome following OLT.

SUMMARY

As the gap between patients and available organs remains, continued investigation into appropriate allocation and maximization of outcomes following liver transplant will continue.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in the setting of liver transplantation

1. Posttransplantation recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection is a universal phenomenon with a highly variable natural history. 2. Approximately 10% to 25% of hepatitis C virus- infected recipients of liver allografts will develop cirrhosis within 5 years' after transplantation. 3. The 1-year actuarial risk of hepatic decompensation after recurrence of cirrhosis approximates 42%. 4. Some of the factors associated with aggressive recurrence include donor and recipient age, recent year of transplantation, recipient gender and race, the use of antithymocyte globulin, and high dose of corticosteroids. 5. Highly aggressive recurrent hepatitis C virus infection leading to cirrhosis fares poorly after retransplantation in the presence of hyperbilirubinemia and renal failure, with a 1-year survival of approximately 40%. 6. Elevated serum aminotransferases are a poor indicator or recurrent disease. 7. Current sustained virological response after combination pegylated alpha interferon and ribavirin treatment is approximately 25%. 8. There is no consensus on initiation time point, duration of treatment, or dosage. Given immunosuppression, at least 48 weeks of therapy is a reasonable approach. 9. Treatment for 48 weeks is cost effective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for men aged 55 years is $29,100 per life-year saved.

Treatment of hepatitis C

The combination of pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin has improved treatment success rates in patients with hepatitis C with sustained response rates of just over 50% overall and more than 70% for those with genotypes 2 and 3. This article reviews the use of combination therapy, contraindications, factors influencing response and describes approaches to specific patient groups.

Pegylated versus standard interferon-alpha in antiviral regimens for post-transplant recurrent hepatitis C: Comparison of tolerability and efficacy

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, regimens including pegylated interferon-alpha are superior to those including standard interferon; the present retrospective study was performed to verify whether the same is applicable to biopsy-proven recurrent hepatitis C (genotype 1b) after liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (16 male) were studied. Twelve had received interferon-alpha(2b) (IFN), 9 MU weekly and 12 received pegylated interferon-alpha(2b) (PEG-IFN), 0.5 microg/kg weekly. All had received oral ribavirin 600-800 mg/day. Treatment duration was intended for 12 months. A repeat liver biopsy, with evaluation of the Ishak grading and staging scores, was obtained at 1 year.

RESULTS

Only 12/24 patients (50%) completed a full year of therapy; 17 (71%) experienced side-effects requiring a 50% dosage reduction or discontinuation of the IFN, PEG-IFN and/or ribavirin. This was observed in 6/12 patients (50%) treated with IFN in comparison to 11/12 patients (92%) treated with PEG-IFN (P < 0.05). The difference was mainly accounted for by anemia and leukopenia that were reported in 4/12 IFN patients (33%) versus 9/12 PEG-IFN patients (75%; P < 0.05), respectively. End-of-treatment viral response (ETVR) and histological response were always associated and occurred in 4/24 patients (17%), two in each treatment arm. Patients with ETVR were younger, had always completed 1 year of therapy, had had recurrent hepatitis later after transplantation and presented a higher baseline grading score.

CONCLUSIONS

In the OLT setting, the potential benefits of antiviral treatments including PEG-IFN may be limited by the poor tolerability of the adopted drugs.

Hepatocyte expression of minichromosome maintenance protein-2 predicts fibrosis progression after transplantation for chronic hepatitis C virus: a pilot study

Although graft infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) occurs in virtually all patients transplanted for HCV-related liver disease, the outcome ranges from minimal disease to the rapid development of cirrhosis. Induction of hepatocyte cell cycle entry followed by inhibition of cell cycle progression has been proposed as a potential mechanism whereby HCV may cause hepatocyte dysfunction and may promote fibrogenesis. The aim of this study was to assess whether early hepatocyte cell cycle entry might predict subsequent fibrosis progression in patients with graft HCV infection after liver transplantation. Liver biopsies from 21 liver transplant recipients diagnostic of graft HCV infection but before development of significant fibrosis were studied. Patients were classed as nonprogressors, intermediate progressors, or rapid progressors according to the rate of fibrosis progression calculated from the most recent biopsy. Minichromosome maintenance protein 2 (Mcm-2), a highly sensitive and specific marker of cell cycle entry, and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 were detected by immunohistochemistry. Hepatocyte Mcm-2 expression increased significantly according to rate of fibrosis. For nonprogressors, the median percentage of positive hepatocytes was 5.3% (range, 0.92%-11.2%) compared with 20.7% (4.6%-43.7%) in intermediate progressors and 23.7% (11.6%-55.2%) in rapid progressors (P = 0.002). By contrast, there was no evidence of a difference in hepatocyte p21 expression. Median values and ranges were 3.4% (range, 1.1%-30%), 13.3% (range, 1.4%-42.3%), and 11.8% (range, 7.6%-52.3%) for nonprogressors, intermediate progressors, and rapid progressors, respectively (P = 0.11). In conclusion, hepatocyte cell cycle entry may be important in the pathogenesis of posttransplant HCV hepatitis. Early assessment of hepatocyte Mcm-2 expression could help identify patients at high risk for progressive fibrosis before it occurs.

Second hepatitis C replication compartment indicated by viral dynamics during liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The existence of an extrahepatic hepatitis C virus replication compartment is an important question for optimizing therapy and preventing the infection of liver grafts. An extraheptic replication compartment could be indicated if viral decline during the anhepatic phase is not a single exponential. However, the duration of the anhepatic phase is too short (0.5-2h) to allow such analysis. Here we mathematically analyze viral decline during liver transplantation beyond the period of the anhepatic phase and examine the possibility of viral compartmentalization.

METHODS

Viral load of 30 patients undergoing liver transplantation was frequently measured. Simulation and non-linear fitting of differential equation models were used to test different compartmentalization hypotheses.

RESULTS

In 16 of the patients (56%), a bi-phasic viral decline was observed which is explained by the existence of a second replication compartment. This extrahepatic compartment is responsible for about 3.1% of virus in circulation and the mean half-life of its infected cells is 2.6 days. The remaining patients, with a single exponential decline, have either a second compartment with relatively low contribution or no second compartment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide a first quantitative picture of the extrahepatic hepatitis C viral contribution and may suggest new approaches for viral clearance.

Hepatitis C virus viral recurrence and liver mitochondrial damage after liver transplantation in HIV-HCV co-infected patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

As life expectancy in HIV-HCV co-infected patients improves, end stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation (LT) may become an emerging problem. We report the Paul Brousse Hospital experience of transplantation for end stage cirrhosis in HIV-HCV co-infected patients.

METHODS

Seven consecutive HIV-HCV co-infected patients were transplanted between December 1999 and December 2002 for end stage liver disease due to HCV. All patients were treated by highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV plasma viral load was <400 copies/ml and median CD4 lymphocyte count was 306 cells/mm3 (range, 103-510) before LT. At the time of evaluation (March 2003), the median follow-up was 21 months (range, 4-40).

RESULTS

Two patients died, 4 and 22 months, respectively after LT. At the last biopsy, METAVIR score was staged F4 in two patients, F3 in two, and F1 in one. Microvesicular steatosis was noted in nearly all patients. The ratio of mitochondrial to nuclear DNA was low in three of four patients examined as compared with the amount of liver mtDNA found in eight HIV-negative, HCV-infected controls (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant defect in the activity of the respiratory chain complex IV was noted in all five patients studied. Mitochondrial hepatotoxicity and severe HCV recurrence occur in HIV-HCV co-infected patients after LT.

Liver transplantation and hepatitis C virus: systematic review of antiviral therapy

Antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is increasingly used. This systematic review presents both viral and histological response in three areas: pretransplant (5 studies/180 patients), preemptive therapy soon after transplant (10 studies/417 patients), and therapy for established disease (75 studies/2027 patients). There were only 16 randomized studies (543 patients). Significant dose reductions and drug stoppage rates occurred. The data on histological improvement and risk of rejection are conflicting. Even the best antiviral therapy (pegylated interferon/ribavirin) is neither easily used nor reasonably effective. The best strategy will be pretransplant treatment, most likely with newer agents.

Triple Antiviral Therapy with Amantadine for IFN-Ribavirin Nonresponders with Recurrent Posttransplantation Hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

HCV reinfection after liver transplantation is universal and has an accelerated course with a high risk of progression to cirrhosis. It is now established that combination therapy with interferon (IFN) alpha and ribavirin may achieve a sustained virological response in 20% of transplanted patients. However, the optimal therapy for nonresponders remains an unresolved issue. We conducted a pilot study to determine the efficacy and safety of triple antiviral therapy in IFN-ribavirin nonresponders with recurrent chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Twenty-four nonresponders to the IFN-ribavirin combination were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were treated with IFN-alpha (3 million units three times a week subcutaneously with ribavirin [800-1,000 mg daily]) and amantadine 200 mg daily for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the loss of HCV RNA 6 months after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Median age was 50 years; 72% were men and 82% had genotype 1. The median interval between the end of combination therapy and enrollment was 11 months. Twenty-four patients started therapy, but five (21%) withdrew due to side effects, including two with anemia. On an intent-to-treat basis, 18 patients (75%) had a biochemical response and 9 (37%) had a virologic response at the end of triple antiviral therapy. Eight of these nine patients (33%) had a sustained virological response. The mean METAVIR score improved from A 2.2 F2.1 before treatment to A 1.2 F1.9 in sustained virological responders. In virological nonresponders, inflammatory activity did not change, but fibrosis worsened. Several patients required treatment with erythropoietin for anemia. Triple therapy was well tolerated and neither increased the frequency nor severity of side effects.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that triple antiviral therapy for 48 weeks induced a sustained virological response in 33% of IFN-ribavirin nonresponders with recurrent hepatitis C.

Liver transplantation for viral hepatitis

Viral hepatitis is associated with two forms of liver failure that may require liver transplantation: fulminant hepatic failure associated with all forms of acute viral hepatitis and chronic liver failure as a result of chronic hepatitis B and C infection (or both). This review briefly discusses liver transplantation for fulminant hepatitis but focuses on transplantation for hepatitis B- and hepatitis C-associated cirrhosis.

Interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: cohort study of 38 patients

AIM

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) is universal following liver transplantation. Patients are often treated with interferon and ribavirin in an attempt to eradicate the virus. We describe our experience with 38 patients with recurrent HCV from a single liver transplant program.

METHODS

Between October 2000 and November 2001, 38 patients with recurrent HCV were treated with interferon alpha 2b 3 million units three times a week and ribavirin 1000-1200 mg per day. HCV RNA and liver biopsies were performed before treatment at the end of treatment (EOT), and 6 months after EOT in patients who were HCV RNA negative at EOT.

RESULTS

There were 29 males and nine females. Median age was 49 years. In total, 34 patients were genotype 1 and two each were genotype 3 and 4. Six patients received HCV positive donors and 24 patients (63%) completed treatment. The most common indication for discontinuation of treatment was severe fatigue in 14 patients (37%). On intention to treat analysis, a sustained biochemical and virological response occurred in 10 patients (26%). Unchanged or improved fibrosis scores were present in 37% of patients, of whom 71% were non-responders to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin were poorly tolerated in this series of recurrent HCV patients, with sustained HCV eradication occurring in only 26% of patients. However, the majority of non-responders demonstrated unchanged or improved fibrosis scores, suggesting that a subset of patients may benefit from maintenance antiviral therapy to prevent the development of cirrhosis.

Peginterferon alfa-2a for hepatitis C after liver transplantation: two randomized, controlled trials

There is currently no effective treatment for recurrent hepatitis C after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We therefore performed two randomized, controlled trials--a prophylaxis trial and a treatment trial--to evaluate the safety and efficacy of peginterferon alfa-2a in patients who had undergone OLT. The prophylaxis trial enrolled 54 patients within 3 weeks after OLT, and the treatment trial enrolled 67 patients 6 to 60 months after OLT. In each trial, patients were randomized to treatment with once weekly injections of 180 microg peginterferon alfa-2a or no antiviral treatment for 48 weeks and were followed up for 24 weeks thereafter. Peginterferon alfa-2a treated patients had significantly lower hepatitis C virus RNA levels and more favorable changes in hepatic histological features compared with untreated controls. However, only 2 treated patients in the prophylaxis trial (8%) and 3 in the treatment trial (12%) achieved a sustained virological response. In the prophylaxis trial, 8 patients (31%) in the peginterferon alfa-2a group and 9 (32%) in the untreated group were withdrawn prematurely; whereas in the treatment trial, 10 patients (30%) in the peginterferon alfa-2a group and 6 (19%) in the untreated group were withdrawn prematurely. The incidence of acute rejection was similar in the treated and untreated groups in both the prophylaxis (12% vs. 21%; P = .5) and treatment (12% vs. 0%; P = .1) trials. In conclusion, peginterferon alfa-2a treatment for 48 weeks is safe and tolerable and offers some efficacy in the post-OLT setting. Randomized controlled studies are needed to establish the efficacy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin in patients who have undergone OLT.

Role of growth factors in the treatment of patients with HIV/HCV coinfection and patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C (HCV) contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality of patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and those with recurrent hepatitis C after successful liver transplantation. Treatment of hepatitis C in these patient populations, while crucial, can be quite challenging. Baseline cytopenias, in particular, may limit dosing of interferon and/or ribavirin or preclude therapy entirely when standard guidelines are followed. Concomitant medications, opportunistic infections, and other bone marrow insults account for the anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia frequently encountered in these patients. Sustained virologic response rates in published series for HIV/HCV and post-transplantation HCV have not reached those seen in treatment of HCV alone, despite the highly selected patient populations chosen for these studies. Hematopoietic growth factors such as erythropoietin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors may be used to improve the anemia and neutropenia seen during treatment of HCV. Reported experience with these growth factors is limited in HIV/HCV coinfected patients, but studies are underway to determine if growth factors improve adherence to therapy and perhaps virologic response rates. Post-transplantation studies of HCV therapy have reported more liberal use of growth factors; however, discontinuation rates have been high and virologic response rates have been disappointing. Further study of growth factors as a means to increase sustained virologic response rates and maintain adequate dosing and duration of interferon and ribavirin therapy in these patient populations is needed.

Applicability, tolerability and efficacy of preemptive antiviral therapy in hepatitis C-infected patients undergoing liver transplantation

Preliminary studies suggest preemptive anti-HCV therapy in liver transplant recipients may enhance the rates of viral clearance, but the applicability and tolerability of preemptive therapy has not been evaluated in a contemporary cohort. In this randomized study, the safety and tolerability of preemptive standard (IFN) or pegylated (peg-IFN) interferon alfa-2b (3 MU thrice weekly or 1.5 microg/kg weekly), or IFN/peg-IFN plus ribavirin (600 mg increased to 1.0-1.2 g daily) was initiated 2-6 weeks post-transplantation and continued for a total of 48 weeks. Only 51 (41%) of 124 transplant recipients were eligible for preemptive treatment; eligible patients had lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and Childs-Pugh scores pre-transplantation and were more frequently live donor transplant recipients than ineligible patients. Dose reductions and discontinuations were required in 85% and 37% of patients, respectively, and 27% experienced serious adverse events. Growth factor (GF) use (erythropoietin and GCSF) in the latter half of the study did not significantly affect the frequency of dose reductions. Only 15% of patients were able to achieve full-dose treatment during treatment. End-of-treatment and sustained virological responses were 13.6% and 9.1%, respectively, with most responders in the combination therapy group. We conclude that preemptive antiviral therapy is applicable to only a portion of transplant recipients, with 'sicker' patients less likely to be managed by this approach. Living donor liver transplant recipients were more frequently eligible for treatment than deceased donor recipients. Virological response rates are low, likely related to the poor tolerability of therapy and the lack of achievement of target drug doses. Future studies should focus on alternative dosing schedules with more aggressive use of adjuvant therapies, including GFs.

Preemptive therapy for hepatitis C virus after living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is important for patients with end-stage viral hepatitis because of the cadaveric organ shortage. Preliminary results, however, indicate that LDLT might be disadvantageous for patients positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV).

METHODS

The subjects were 23 patients who underwent LDLT for HCV cirrhosis. All the patients preemptively received antiviral therapy consisting of interferon-alfa2b and ribavirin, which was started approximately 1 month after the operation. The therapy continued for 12 months after the first negative HCV RNA test. The patients were then observed without the therapy for 6 months (group 1). The therapy was continued for at least 12 months even when the HCV RNA test remained positive (group 2). The subjects were removed from the protocol if they could not continue the therapy for 12 months because of adverse effects or could not start the therapy because of early death.

RESULTS

Eight patients were removed from the protocol. Nine patients were assigned to group 1 and the other six to group 2. The sustained virologic response ratio was 39% (9 of 23). There was a significant difference between the groups in the histologic activity score 1 year after the therapy. The cumulated 3-year survival of the HCV-positive patients was 85%, which was comparable with that of patients negative for HCV (n=93 [90%]).

CONCLUSIONS

The present preemptive antiviral protocol after LDLT is safe and might warrant a controlled study for confirming its benefit on graft survival.

Treatment of hepatitis B and C after liver transplantation. Part 2, hepatitis C

End-stage liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus is a major indication for liver transplantation. However, recurrence of hepatitis in the graft is a major issue. HCV re-infection after transplantation is almost constant, and recent data confirm that it significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Factors that may influence disease severity and consequent progression of HCV graft injury remain unclear. Chronic HCV infection develops in 60%-80% of patients, and 6%-28% ultimately progress to cirrhosis within 5 years. Pre-transplantation antiviral treatment is not easily related to poor tolerance. Attempts to administer prophylactic post-transplantation antiviral treatment are under evaluation but are limited by antiviral drug side effects. Treatment of established graft lesions with interferon or ribavirin as single agents has been disappointing. Combination therapy gave promising results, with sustained virological response in 25% of patients, but indications, modality and duration of treatment should be assessed.

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) secondary to hepatitis viruses has evolved rapidly during the last two decades. ESLD secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) accounts for approximately 50% of LT in the United States and Europe. Despite the decrease in the number of new HCV infections, the prevalence of advanced HCV-related liver disease is steadily increasing. In light of the near universal recurrence of posttransplantation HCV infection and our limited ability to treat recurrent disease, transplantation is in danger of being overrun by viral hepatitis, unless effective strategies can be used to treat disease, expand the donor pool of available organs, and prevent disease recurrence. In the early 1980s, results of LT for chronic hepatitis B virus infection were hampered by recurrent infection and subsequent allograft failure. However, with the introduction of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and treatment with potent nucleoside analogs, there has been a resurgence of LT for hepatitis B virus-related ESLD. Despite the wide acceptance of LT as a therapy for ESLD, there is little consensus on the appropriate immunosuppressive regimens, and prophylactic and therapeutic treatments vary widely from one center to another. This review summarizes available data and highlights appropriate strategies to improve outcomes.

Recurrent hepatitis C genotype 1b following liver transplantation: treatment with combination interferon-ribavirin therapy

BACKGROUND

Recurrent hepatitis C is very common leading to graft cirrhosis in a significant proportion of patients. Preliminary reports of combination therapy with interferon-ribavirin have been promising but generally applied to selected patients with chronic mild disease. Little is known, however, about the efficacy and risk of adverse effects when it is used in general clinical practice.

AIMS

To analyse the efficacy (biochemical, virological and histological response) and tolerance of combination therapy in patients with recurrent hepatitis C genotype 1b.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (mean age 54 years; range 37-67 years; 75% male) with recurrent hepatitis C virus (histology at baseline: acute hepatitis (n = 3); chronic hepatitis (n = 21) with F3 or 4 in 77%) were treated with 12 months interferon (1.5-3 MU thrice weekly) + ribavirin (600-1200 mg daily) followed by 6 months ribavirin (58%), at a median of 427 days (56-2812) after transplantation.

RESULTS

Seven patients (29%) discontinued therapy due to side effects, mainly anaemia, at a median of 3 months since initiation. Dose modifications were required in 88% of those completing the whole course of therapy. Overall, the sustained virological and biochemical response was 12.5%. This rate was slightly higher (18%) if only the 17 patients who finished the whole course of therapy were analysed. Histological improvement was achieved in 31.5% of treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy has a very limited efficacy in the liver transplant setting, although some benefit may be achieved, even in those with advanced graft fibrosis. Tolerance, however, remains a matter of concern.

Outcomes of liver transplantation in HIV-infected individuals: the impact of HCV and HBV infection

Liver transplantation (LT) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals is considered to be an experimental therapy with limited reported worldwide experience, and little long-term survival data. Published data suggest that the short-term outcome is encouraging in selected patients. Here, we report our experience in 14 HIV-infected liver allograft recipients, and compare outcomes between those coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the non-HCV group. A total of 14 HIV-infected patients (12 male, 2 female, age range 26-59 years) underwent LT between January 1995 and April 2003. Indications for LT were HCV (n = 7), hepatitis B virus (HBV; n = 4), alcohol-induced liver disease (n = 2), and seronegative hepatitis (n = 1); 3 patients presented with acute liver failure. At LT, CD4 cell counts (T-helper cells that are targets for HIV) ranged from 124 to 500 cells/microL (mean 264), and HIV viral loads from <50 to 197,000 copies/mL. Nine of 12 patients were exposed to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) before LT. In the non-HCV group (n = 7), all patients are alive, all surviving more than 365 days (range 668-2,661 days). No patient has experienced HBV recurrence, and graft function is normal in all 7 patients. However, 5 of 7 HCV-infected patients died after LT at 95-784 days (median 161 days). A total of 4 patients died of complications due to recurrent HCV infection and sepsis, despite antiviral therapy in 3 of them. A total of 3 patients experienced complications relating to HAART therapy. In conclusion, outcome of LT in HIV-infected patients with HBV or other causes of chronic liver disease indicates that LT is an acceptable therapeutic option in selected patients. However, longer follow-up in larger series is required before a conclusive directive can be provided for HCV / HIV coinfected patients requiring LT.

Renal transplant recipient with chronic hepatitis C who obtained sustained viral response after interferon-beta therapy

A 44-year-old Japanese woman with a history of living-related renal transplantation was treated with interferon-beta (IFN-beta) for chronic infection with sero-group 2 hepatitis C virus (HCV). Serum HCV-RNA titer was 160 kilo-international units/ml. Treatment with intravenous IFN-beta daily was given for 6 weeks. Serum HCV-RNA was undetectable at 3 weeks after initiating therapy. Renal graft rejection did not occur. Six months after completing therapy, she obtained sustained viral response. This case demonstrates that IFN-beta therapy safely induced clearance of HCV in a renal transplant recipient with stable renal function, low viral load and/or HCV sero-group 2.

Natural history of hepatitis C following liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Currently, chronic hepatitis C virus-infection-related cirrhosis is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the USA and most parts of the world. While the incidence of new hepatitis C virus cases has decreased, the prevalence of infection will not peak until the year 2040. In addition, as the duration of infection increases, the proportion of new patients with cirrhosis will double by 2020 in an untreated patient population. If this model is correct, the projected increase in the need for liver transplantation secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus infection will place an impossible burden on an already limited supply of organs. In this article we present a comprehensive review of post-transplant hepatitis C virus infection and address the major challenges that face the transplant community.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hepatitis C virus infection recurs virtually in every post-transplant patient. Typically, serum levels of hepatitis C virus RNA increase rapidly from week 2 post-liver transplant, achieving 1-year post-liver transplant levels that are 10-20-fold greater than the mean pre-liver transplant levels. Progression of chronic hepatitis C virus is more aggressive after liver transplantation with a cumulative probability of developing graft cirrhosis estimated to reach 30% at 5 years. Approximately 10% of the patients with recurrent disease will die or require re-transplantation within 5 years post-transplantation. Interventions to prevent, improve, or halt the recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection have been evaluated by multiple small studies worldwide with similar overall rates of virological clearance of approximately 9-30%. Current consensus recommends combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for those patients with histological recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection and fibrosis of >/= 2/4. Therapy is adjusted to tolerance and rescued with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin for bone marrow suppression.

SUMMARY

The major challenges that face the transplant community in the coming years include new strategies to meet the growing demand for limited organ donor supplies and improvement of treatment for those patients in whom recurrence of viral disease has occurred. Only with improved antiviral treatments and strategies will we make a significant impact on this problem.

Hepatitis C virus antiviral therapy in patients with cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is generally a slowly progressive disease. A minority of infected patients, however, eventually will develop cirrhosis and its life-threatening complications.Recent development of combination interferon (IFN) and ribavirin(RBV) antiviral therapy has changed the approach to patients infected with the virus. Once cirrhosis develops, treatment is a difficult task and should be done with close monitoring because of numerous adverse effects. In patients with compensated cirrhosis,combination therapy is the most efficient approach and offers the highest sustained virological response. Although data are limited,no significant differences have been reported between the use of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and standard IFN in combination with RBV. Moreover, PEG-IFN has a higher risk of hematological complications, and this should be considered when using in advanced disease. Antiviral therapy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis should be used only in a clinical trial setting because of reported severe adverse effects. After liver transplantation, combination therapy may be an alternative for a limited number of patients. Although definitive recommendations cannot be made because of limited studies, there is a group of very well compensated patients with HCV and cirrhosis who benefited from treatment by clinicians well versed in the use of combination therapy.

Pilot study of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C is often treated with an interferon and ribavirin combination therapy, but the results have been disappointing. Given the promising results reported with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C, we were interested in evaluating the effectiveness of this treatment in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C (HCV).

METHODS

Between November 2001 and September 2002, patients with recurrent HCV were screened to determine if they were eligible for treatment. Liver function tests, HCV-RNA, and liver biopsies were performed on all patients prior to treatment. HCV-RNA was repeated at 3 months, the end of treatment (EOT), and 6 months after EOT for patients who were HCV-RNA negative at EOT. Patients were prospectively followed after starting weekly pegylated interferon alfa-2b 1.5 mcg/kg per week and ribavirin 800 mg per day (Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) with folic acid 1 mg per day.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients eligible for treatment displayed a median age of 50.4 years. Eighteen patients completed treatment, 4 remain on treatment, and 17 were intolerant. Sustained HCV-RNA eradication occurred in 66.7% of patients who completed treatment. Side effects led to treatment withdrawal in 17 patients (43.6%) In an intention-to treat analysis, sustained HCV-RNA eradication occurred in 30.8% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Side effects are an important limiting factor in the treatment of recurrent HCV with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. However, these results are encouraging as sustained HCV eradication occurred in at least 66.7% of patients who completed treatment. Prospective randomized trials are required to assess the effectiveness of this treatment and its impact on quality of life and histology.

Effects of interferon treatment on liver histology and allograft rejection in patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation remains a significant cause of graft loss and retransplantation. Although treatment of recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-based regimens has become widely accepted as safe and can lead to sustained virologic clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA, long-term histologic improvement and the risk of precipitating graft rejection remain controversial. The present study is a retrospective evaluation of the clinical and histological consequences of treating recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-based therapy in a selected group of liver transplant recipients. Twenty-three liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C and histologic evidence of progressive fibrosis completed at least 6 months of interferon, 83% of whom received pegylated-interferon alpha-2b; only 4 tolerated ribavirin. Overall, 11 patients (48%) had undetectable HCV RNA at the end of 6 months of treatment. Of these patients, 3 remained HCV RNA-negative on maintenance interferon monotherapy for 33 months, and the other 8 (35%) completed treatment and remained HCV RNA-undetectable 24 weeks after discontinuation of interferon. Overall necroinflammatory activity in liver biopsies obtained 2 years after HCV RNA became undetectable decreased significantly (7.73 +/- 2.37 vs. 5.64 +/- 2.94 units before and after treatment, respectively; P =.016). However, 5 of these 11 patients had no histologic improvement in follow-up liver histology. Liver biopsies in the 12 nonresponders demonstrated disease progression. Of the 23 patients treated with interferon, 8 (35%) had evidence of acute or chronic rejection on posttreatment liver biopsy, most of whom had no previous history of rejection (P <.01 for comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment prevalence of histologic rejection), and 2 experienced graft loss from chronic rejection, requiring retransplantation. In conclusion, interferon treatment of recurrent hepatitis C does not consistently improve histologic disease after virologic response, and it may increase the risk of allograft rejection.

Pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the treatment of post-liver transplant recurrent hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Histological recurrence of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) occurs in the majority of persons transplanted for cirrhosis as a result of HCV. Herein we analyze our experience with the use of both conventional and pegylated (PEG) interferon (IFN) in combination with ribavirin (RBV) in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV.

METHODS

Patients transplanted between 1992 and 2001 with post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) histological recurrence of HCV, and who were treated with at least 6 months of IFN or PEG-IFN in combination with RBV were included in this analysis. A retrospective chart review was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were included. Fifteen were treated with IFN/RBV and 16 with PEG-IFN/RBV. Of these 16, 11 had been begun on IFN/RBV and were changed to PEG-IFN/RBV because of persistent viremia. Three patients (20%) in the IFN/RBV group and six patients (37.5%) in the PEG-IFN/RBV group experienced a virologic response (VR) on therapy. Of the six patients experiencing VR in the PEG-IFN/RBV group, three (50%) were IFN/RBV non-responders. There were two sustained VRs (SVR). The 65.6% of all patients experienced a biochemical response (BR) on therapy. Seven deaths were observed. Dose modifications of IFN or PEG-IFN (87.1%) and RBV (80.6%) and the requirement for hematopoietic growth factors were frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of recurrent HCV infection with combination of IFN or PEG-IFN and RBV produced an on-therapy VR in 29% and BR in 65% of patients. Hematologic toxicity and dose modifications were frequent. Our experience with antiviral therapy for HCV post-OLT remains disappointing but PEG-IFN + RBV appears to produce VR in a sizable portion of IFN + RBV non-responders.

Liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The field of liver transplantation continues to evolve. This review discusses the major themes of controversy and investigation over the past 12 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

Organ allocation remains a major area of investigation and controversy in liver transplantation. The MELD system, which has been implemented since 2002, appears to adequately predict both death on the waiting list and short-term survival after OLT. However, regional variations in allocation remain despite this system. In an attempt to further increase available organs, living donor adult transplantation has gained interest. However, with continued high rates of reported complications and additional reports of donor deaths, interest has been tempered and more diligent evaluation of the ethics and techniques for this procedure have been sought. As more patients continue to survive for longer periods after OLT, medical complications from medications are now seen and require skillful management in these individuals. Recurrent viral disease after transplant remains a significant challenge as will the increasing need for retransplantation in these patients.

SUMMARY

The review of the literature in liver transplantation continues to raise more issues than answer questions. It is likely that going into the future the key themes reviewed here will remain as further studies of larger patient populations will be required to more specifically identify "best practice" for care of these individuals.

Prediction of sustained virological response in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus following combination pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin therapy using tissue hepatitis C virus reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing

The optimal duration of therapy for pegylated interferon combined with ribavirin in recurrent Hepatitis C virus (HCV) following liver transplantation is not known. We wanted to determine if testing for HCV in liver tissue by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was superior in predicting sustained virological response (SVR) in comparison to standard HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) detection in the serum. All recipients received combination pegylated alpha-2b interferon (1.5 mcg/kg) and ribavirin (200-600 mg/d) therapy for at least 48 weeks of therapy and were found to have nondetectable HCV RNA by PCR serum testing at the end of therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as nondetectable serum HCV RNA at 6 months post treatment withdrawal. Ten liver transplant recipients were included in the study; mean time from transplantation was 29.2 months. All had nondetectable serum HCV RNA by RT-PCR. In hepatic tissue 7/10 patients HCV RNA was found to be positive by RT-PCR while 3/10 had nondetectable HCV RNA in their liver by RT-PCR. SVR was attained in all 3/10 that were hepatic tissue HCV PCR negative after 12 months of combination therapy. In conclusion, direct detection of HCV RNA by RT-PCR of liver tissue appears to more effectively predict SVR following pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy than the conventional use of serum.