A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia. Candidemia Study Group and the National Institute

Current aspects of invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis in adult intensive care patients

Sepsis is a leading cause of death in the intensive care unit (ICU), with Candida spp. in the forefront among the important pathogens. As recent studies have shown, survival outcome is strongly influenced by adequate antifungal therapy at an early stage that is often delayed by the time lag associated with microbiological diagnosis. Risk factor-based prediction models have a high negative predictive value, but positive prediction of candidaemia in the individual patient remains elusive. New antigen- or DNA-based methods for early diagnosis still await clinical validation. Their routine use is hampered by methodological issues. Species distribution of invasive Candida isolates in the ICU appears to be influenced primarily by age, previous hospitalisation and colonising species. In the context of the importance of adequate first-line treatment, recent guidelines favour the use of echinocandins in critically ill patients with symptoms evoking high suspicion of invasive candidiasis. This is supported by robust clinical trial data, a few interactions and low toxicity. Fluconazole is characterised by reduced activity against some important Candida species, elevated rates of persistent infection seen in comparative trials. Amphotericin B deoxycholate should be considered obsolete in ICU patients because of its high toxicity. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a rare devastating infection in the general ICU population, but some centres have reported elevated incidences and underdiagnosis as determined in autopsy-controlled studies. Treatment with mould-active agents such as voriconazole must be initiated early in patients with suspected IA.

Clinical safety and tolerability issues in use of triazole derivatives in management of fungal infections

There has been an increase in the number of patients susceptible to invasive fungal infections (IFIs) leading to a greater need for effective, well tolerated, and easily administered antifungal agents. The advent of triazoles has revolutionized the care of patients requiring treatment or prophylaxis for IFIs. However, triazoles have been associated with a number of adverse events and significant drug–drug interactions. While commonly used, physicians and patients should be aware of the distinct properties of these agents in order to ensure that patients are optimally treated with the least amount of toxicity possible. Clinicians should have a full understanding of the basic pharmacokinetics, absorption, and bioavailability of triazoles. Moreover, knowledge of the drug–drug interactions and potential toxicities of each agent is critical prior to administering a triazole. Careful history taking, thorough review of the patient’s medication list, and detailed discussion with the patients and their families about the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these agents should be performed. Clinicians treating patients with triazoles should closely follow them, monitor pertinent laboratory tests, and consider measuring drug levels as needed. This article will review the basic pharmacokinetic properties and most frequently encountered adverse events and pitfalls associated with triazoles in clinical practice.

Candidemia and invasive candidiasis: a review of the literature for the burns surgeon

Advances in critical care, operative techniques, early fluid resuscitation, antimicrobials to control bacterial infections, nutritional support to manage the hypermetabolic response and early wound excision and coverage has improved survival rates in major burns patients. These advances in management have been associated with increased recognition of invasive infections caused by Candida species in critically ill burns patients. Candida albicans is the most common species to cause invasive Candida infections, however, non-albicans Candida species appear to becoming more frequent. These later species may be less fluconazole susceptible than Candida albicans. High crude and attributable mortality rates from invasive Candida sepsis are multi-factorial. Diagnosis of invasive candidiasis and candidemia remains difficult. Prophylactic and pre-emptive therapies appear promising strategies, but there is no specific approach which is well-studied and clearly efficacious in high-risk burns patients. Treatment options for invasive candidiasis include several amphotericin B formulations and newer less toxic antifungal agents, such as azoles and echinocandins. We review the currently available data on diagnostic and management strategies for invasive candidiasis and candidemia; whenever possible providing reference to the high-risk burn patients. We also present an algorithm for the management of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in burn patients.

Antifungal therapy in infants and children with proven, probable or suspected invasive fungal infections

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in children. Optimal treatment strategies are yet to be defined.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to systematically identify and summarise the effects of different antifungal therapies in children with proven, probable or suspected invasive fungal infections.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2008), EMBASE (1980 to September 2008) and CINAHL (1988 to September 2008) without language restrictions. We also handsearched reference lists and abstracts of conference proceedings and scientific meetings, and contacted authors of included studies and pharmaceutical manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing a systemic antifungal agent with a comparator (including placebo) in children (one month to 16 years) with proven, probable or suspected invasive fungal infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment, and extracted data using an intention-to-treat approach. We synthesised data using the random-effects model and expressed results as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven trials of antifungal agents in children with prolonged fever and neutropenia (suspected fungal infection) and candidaemia or invasive candidiasis (proven fungal infection). Four trials compared a lipid preparation of amphotericin B with conventional amphotericin B (395 participants), one trial compared an echinocandin with a lipid preparation of amphotericin B (82 participants) in suspected infection; one trial compared an echinocandin with a lipid preparation of amphotericin B in children with candidaemia or invasive candidiasis (109 participants) and one trial compared different azole antifungals in children with candidaemia (43 participants). No difference in all-cause mortality and other primary endpoints (mortality related to fungal infection or complete resolution of fungal infections) were observed. No difference in breakthrough fungal infection was observed in children with prolonged fever and neutropenia.When lipid preparations and conventional amphotericin B were compared in children with prolonged fever and neutropenia, nephrotoxicity was less frequently observed with a lipid preparation (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.90, P = 0.02) however substantial heterogeneity was observed (I(2) = 59%, P = 0.06). Children receiving liposomal amphotericin B were less likely to develop infusion-related reactions compared with conventional amphotericin B (chills: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.64, P = 0.0005). Children receiving a colloidal dispersion were more likely to develop such reactions than with liposomal amphotericin B (chills: RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.85, P = 0.02). The rate of other clinically significant adverse reactions attributed to the antifungal agent (total reactions; total reactions leading to treatment discontinuation, dose reduction or change in therapy; hypokalaemia and hepatotoxicity) were not significantly different. When echinocandins and lipid preparations were compared, the rate of clinically significant adverse reactions (total reactions; total reactions leading to treatment discontinuation, dose reduction or change in therapy) were not significantly different.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited paediatric data are available comparing antifungal agents in children with proven, probable or suspected invasive fungal infection. No differences in mortality or treatment efficacy were observed when antifungal agents were compared. Children are less likely to develop nephrotoxicity with a lipid preparation of amphotericin B compared with conventional amphotericin B. Further comparative paediatric antifungal drug trials and epidemiological and pharmacological studies are required highlighting the differences between neonates, children and adults with invasive fungal infections.

Clinical aspects of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients

Invasive candidiasis has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit patients. This short review focuses on many aspects of Candida infection in critically ill patients including epidemiology, impact on mortality, problems related to diagnosis, strategies to identify patients at risk of developing fungal infections, role of prophylaxis and pre-emptive strategies, empiric treatment and the role of different classes of antifungal drugs. New antifungal agents, specifically new azoles and echinocandins are discussed.

Current therapeutic approaches to fungal infections in immunocompromised hematological patients

Invasive fungal infections are significant causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia and those who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are at especially high risk. Various fungal agents are responsible for this complication, but Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. are the most frequently isolated micro-organisms; less commonly, infections could be caused by Zygomycetes or other rare molds or yeasts. Several new systemically-administered antifungal agents have been approved for clinical use since 2001; these agents include liposomal amphotericin B, voriconazole, caspofungin, and posaconazole, and they represent a major advance in antifungal therapy and have improved the prognosis of patients with hematological malignancies. This review focuses on therapeutic aspects of the management of fungal infections in hematological patients.

Issues in the design and interpretation of antifungal drug trials in the critically ill

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Invasive fungal infections, such as invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis, are increasingly important in the critical care setting. This review will focus on clinical trials of antifungals in this setting and the methodological issues surrounding them.

RECENT FINDINGS

Critically ill patients have traditionally only comprised a fraction of the patients enrolled in clinical trials exploring antifungal use, but recently a few clinical trials with specific therapeutic approaches have focused on this subpopulation. Increased mortality and problems with diagnosis have fostered the development of new management strategies, such as prophylaxis, pre-emptive treatment, and empirical antifungal therapy.

SUMMARY

Although there are limited data supporting preventive and early therapeutic strategies, their use is recommended in highly selected patients and settings. Although critically ill patients are under-represented in clinical trials of antifungals conducted for the purpose of licensing, most experts agree that it is reasonable to extrapolate from these data until specific trials are conducted.

Treatment of invasive candidiasis with echinocandins

Blood stream infections by Candida spp. represent the majority of invasive fungal infections in intensive care patients. The high crude mortality of invasive candidiasis remained essentially unchanged during the last two decades despite new treatment options that became available. The echinocandins, the latest class of antifungals introduced since 2001, exhibit potent activity against clinically relevant fungi including most Candida spp. In several randomised multicentre phase III trials, anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin showed convincing efficacy when compared with standard treatment regimens. In all trials, echinocandins were at least non-inferior to standard treatments. Anidulafungin was shown to be superior to fluconazole. Echinocandins have a favourable tolerability profile and exhibit a minimal potential for drug interactions since their pharmacokinetics is independent of renal and--largely--hepatic function. As a result of these properties, echinocandins are appropriate drugs of choice for invasive candidiasis in intensive care where many patients experience organ failure and receive multiple drugs with complex interactions.

Invasive candidiasis and candidemia: from current opinions to future perspectives

Candida spp. are the fourth most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections in the United States, as well as the single most important cause of opportunistic fungal infections worldwide. A delayed diagnosis of invasive candidiasis and/or inadequate treatment choice is associated with high mortality rates and prolonged hospital stays. Even though the antifungal armamentarium has been broadened significantly over the last years, the best options for diagnosing and treating invasive candidiasis still remain a matter of discussion. In this article we present and analyze current evidence on the epidemiology, diagnostic methods and treatment options of invasive candidiasis, with a focus on results from randomized clinical trials. Finally, the reader is provided with a brief overview on promising clinical trial designs and antifungals that might shape the treatment of invasive candidiasis in the years to come.

Antifungal treatment strategies in high risk patients

We discuss different strategies for the treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFI) in high risk patients with a focus on patients experiencing profound and prolonged neutropenia, comprising those with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) during remission induction chemotherapy and on patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Among these patients, invasive aspergillosis (IA) is the most frequently observed form of IFI, as opposed to high risk intensive care unit (ICU) patients in whom an increased incidence of invasive candidiasis (IC) can be observed. In both groups, initiation of early treatment has a profound impact on mortality rates, but adequate diagnostic tools are lacking. These circumstances have led to the parallel use of different treatment strategies, e.g. prophylaxis, empiric, pre-emptive and targeted treatment of IFI. The optimum treatment strategies for these severe infections are a matter of extensive research and discussion. A review of major clinical trials on the issue reveals that comparisons between different treatment strategies cannot be made. Considering the complexity of the issue, we advocate an eclectic treatment approach that reduces morbidity and mortality from IFI without compromising tolerability. In allogeneic HSCT recipients, patients receiving induction chemotherapy for AML or MDS and those under immunosuppressive medication for graft vs. host disease after allogeneic HSCT, we recommend prophylaxis with posaconazole. For empiric treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients, we opt for caspofungin as first and liposomal amphotericin B deoxycholate (L-AmB) as second line choice. If the diagnosis of IA can be established, voriconazole should be favoured over the alternative, liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB). While high risk ICU patients benefit from fluconazole prophylaxis for IC, the choice of an optimal agent for targeted therapy depends largely on the neutrophil count. In non-neutropenic patients, we recommend an echinocandin as the first line treatment option. Patients with susceptible Candida spp. may be switched to fluconazole. Caspofungin or micafungin might be preferred to anidulafungin in the neutropenic patient. L-AmB is a valuable second line treatment option for both groups of patients.

[Current treatment of candidemia. Role of anidulafungin]

Despite recent advances in antifungal therapy, the incidence of invasive Candida infections and resulting mortality have remained unchanged in the last few years. In surveillance studies published to date, the estimated incidence of candidemia differs depending on the geographic area and is significantly higher in North America than in Europe. The main predisposing conditions for candidemia are neutropenia, cellular immunity deficit, and alteration of normal microbial flora. Some independent risk factors have been identified, such as previous colonization, antibiotic therapy, central venous catheters, neutropenia, and renal dysfunction. In the last two decades, the proportion of infections due to non-albicans Candida has markedly increased. Although fluconazole use has been considered one of the main causes for the epidemiologic change in invasive candidiasis, especially in the increase of species less sensitive to this agent, this association remains unproven. These recent epidemiological changes are highly important when selecting treatment for candidemia. The echinocandins, which include anidulafungin, represent a step forward in the treatment of these infections. The clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of anidulafungin have been demonstrated in controlled clinical trials in candidemia and invasive candidiasis. Current recommendations include this antifungal agent in the initial empirical therapy of certain patients, especially in those with a critical clinical situation, previous azole exposure, or the possibility of developing adverse events or drug interactions.

Clinical effects of micafungin, a novel echinocandin antifungal agent, on systemic fungal infections in surgery, emergency, and intensive-care medicine: evaluation using the AKOTT algorithm

The clinical efficacy of micafungin (MCFG) in surgery, emergency, and intensive-care medicine has been studied in only a limited number of cases. We conducted a multicenter postmarketing study to evaluate MCFG efficacy and safety in Japan. MCFG was given to patients with a temperature exceeding 37.5 degrees C, either with a proven fungal infection based on mycological or histopathological examination, or those who were regarded as having probable or possible fungal infections (patients who had at least one high-risk factor for the development of a systemic fungal infection and for whom fungi had been detected at multiple sites by surveillance culture or a positive beta-D-glucan test). Efficacy was evaluated using the AKOTT algorithm created by our group (AKOTT is an acronym created from the first letter of the surname of each of the five members of the evaluation committee). Of the 180 patients enrolled, 68 were excluded by exclusion criteria or for other reasons, and 112 (58 with proven candidiasis, 1 with proven aspergillosis, and 53 with suspected fungal infection) were evaluated for efficacy. MCFG was administered at a mean daily dose of 104 mg for a mean duration of 14.2 days. It was effective in 72 p 72 patients, ineffective in 28, and the effect was undeterminable in 12, for an overall clinical efficacy 72.0%. MCFG was effective in 78.6% of those with proven candidiasis and in 65.1% with suspected fungal infection, but it was ineffective in the 1 patient with aspergillosis. MCFG eradicated 77.6% (52/67) of fungi isolated. There were 69 drug-related adverse reactions, mainly abnormal hepatic function tests, in 37 of 178 patients evaluated for safety. One adverse reaction, skin eruption, had a probable causal relationship with drug treatment. In conclusion, MCFG had high clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of deep-seated fungal infections in surgery, emergency, and intensive-care medicine, indicating good potential as a firstline drug for both targeted and empirical therapies.

Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

These updated guidelines replace the previous management guidelines published in 2001. The guidelines are intended for use by health care providers who care for patients who either have these infections or may be at risk for them.

Candida in the ICU

Invasive Candida infections are becoming increasingly recognized in critically ill patients. These infections result in serious morbidity, can be life threatening, and are expensive to manage. Early suspicion of Candida infection and the use of timely and proper antifungal treatment can improve outcome. Although treatment of documented, deep-seated Candida infections in nonneutropenic patients has been studied extensively, guidelines for the management of suspected but undocumented cases of invasive Candida infections in critically ill patients have not been clearly established. Future work should focus on better delineation of the sector of critically ill patients who have suspected invasive Candida infection and who could benefit from the use of empiric antifungal therapy, and on the investigation of novel approaches for the potential salvage of devices infected with Candida species.

Approaches to the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections in Hematologic Malignancy and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Patients with hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at increased risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI) as a result of immunosuppression or organ damage stemming from their underlying disease, its treatment, or both. Such IFIs can cause significant morbidity and mortality, and the diagnosis and treatment of infected patients frequently are clinically challenging. This article discusses the epidemiology and risk factors for IFI in patients with hematologic malignancy and HCT recipients. The pros and cons of available antifungal agents are discussed, and evolving treatment strategies and recent prophylaxis guidelines from various professional organizations are reviewed. Finally, recommendations are offered for antifungal prophylaxis according to risk group.

Overview of the changing epidemiology of candidemia

Candida spp. are currently the fourth most common cause of bloodstream infections in US hospitals, and the third most common cause of bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Over the last 2 decades there has been a shift towards a greater involvement of non-Candida albicans spp. as the cause of candidemia. Several of these non-albicans spp. (e.g., C. glabrata and C. krusei ) exhibit resistance to traditional triazole antifungals like fluconazole, and cross-resistance with newer triazoles, focusing attention on the first-line use of antifungals such as the echinocandins, which possess improved activity against fluconazole-resistant strains. Recent treatment guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommend an echinocandin as primary therapy for nonneutropenic or neutropenic patients with moderately severe to severe candidiasis and for patients at risk for infection with a triazole-resistant strain. However, further improvement in candidemia-associated mortality will only be attainable with the development and validation of new diagnostic tools that will allow earlier detection, discrimination, and treatment of invasive candidiasis. Clinicians should remain vigilant to wider emergence of Candida spp. with echinocandin resistance.

Antifungal treatment for invasive Candida infections: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of mortality among patients at risk. Treatment guidelines vary on optimal treatment strategies. We aimed to determine the effects of different antifungal therapies on global response rates, mortality and safety.

METHODS

We searched independently and in duplicate 10 electronic databases from inception to May 2009. We selected any randomized trial assessing established antifungal therapies for confirmed cases of invasive candidiasis among predominantly adult populations. We performed a meta-analysis and then conducted a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison to differentiate treatment effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses included dosage forms of amphotericin B and fluconazole compared to other azoles.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 11 studies enrolling a total of 965 patients. For our primary analysis of global response rates, we pooled 7 trials comparing azoles to amphotericin B, Relative Risk [RR] 0.87 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.78-0.96, P = 0.007, I2 = 43%, P = 0.09. We also pooled 2 trials of echinocandins versus amphotericin B and found a pooled RR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.99-1.23, P = 0.08). One study compared anidulafungin to fluconazole and yielded a RR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.06-1.51) in favor of anidulafungin. We pooled 7 trials assessing azoles versus amphotericin B for all-cause mortality, resulting in a pooled RR of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74-1.05, P = 0.17, I2 = 0%, P = 0.96). Echinocandins versus amphotericin B (2 trials) for all-cause mortality resulted in a pooled RR of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84-1.20, P = 0.93). Anidulafungin versus fluconazole resulted in a RR of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.48-1.10, P = 0.34). Our mixed treatment comparison analysis found similar within-class effects across all interventions. Adverse event profiles differed, with amphotericin B exhibiting larger adverse event effects.

CONCLUSION

Treatment options appear to offer preferential effects on response rates and mortality. When mycologic data are available, therapy should be tailored.

Recent experience with fungaemia: change in species distribution and azole resistance

Owing to a rise in frequency and change in pattern of cases with fungaemia at our tertiary care centre, we conducted a prospective study for 4 months to understand the epidemiology and outcome of this infection. Detailed case histories including management protocol and outcomes were noted. Records of 140 cases with fungaemia (27.1% adult and 72.9% paediatric patients) were analysed. Although C. tropicalis was the most common yeast isolated, significantly higher isolation of C. guilliermondii (30.4%) and C. pelliculosa (17.6%) was noted in paediatric patients; and C. albicans (26.3%) and C. glabrata (10.5%) in adult patients. Rare species isolated included C. ustus (0.7%) and Trichosporon asahii (2.1%). Mortality was high (56.9% and 47.4%, respectively), in both groups of patients. Resistance to azoles (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole) emerged in C. albicans (12.5-18.8%) and C. tropicalis (10.2-13.6%). Antifungal susceptibility testing report modified the therapy from fluconazole to amphotericin B in 8 patients; 5 survived. In conclusion, the study highlighted the rise of non-albicans Candida species in our hospital with differential distribution in paediatric and adult wards and emergence of azole resistance.

[Clinical use of micafungin for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in critical ill patients]

BACKGROUND

Over the last 30 years a significant increase of Candida spp. invasive disease has been observed in non-neutropenic critical ill patients. Both fluconazole and amphotericin B have been considered first line treatment for invasive (proven and probable) Candida spp. disease, although the mortality rate is still high.

OBJECTIVES

To review the current data on the use of micafungin for the treatment of Candida invasive disease in critical ill patients.

METHODS

The pharmacologic, mycological and clinical properties of micafungin are reviewed based on current published data. The use and efficacy of micafungin for the treatment of Candida invasive disease in critical ill patients is discussed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

To reduce the rate of mortality more effective antifungals and pre-emptive treatment strategies are currently warranted. Candins achieve better results for the treatment of invasive Candida disease in non-neutropenic critical ill patients. Micafungin has a good safety profile (similar to fluconazole). Micafungin is a first line drug for the treatment of invasive Candida disease and may be used as a pre- emptive approach followed by a de-escalating strategy with azoles.

The changing epidemiology of fungal infections: are the lipid-forms of amphotericin B an advance?

The incidence of invasive fungal infections is increasing and new fungal species are emerging as important pathogens. In cancer patients, the main risk factor for the development of systemic fungal disease is severe, prolonged neutropenia. Other factors, such as mucosal damage, presence of a central venous line, immunosuppressive therapy and treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics are contributory. Candida spp. are the fungi most commonly isolated in neutropenic patients. There has been a dramatic increase in non-C. albicans species, such as C. glabrata and C. krusei, largely as a result of extensive prophylactic and therapeutic use of fluconazole, to which these species are largely resistant. In neutropenic patients with candidaemia, amphotericin B is the drug of choice although the conventional formulation may be poorly tolerated. Lipid-based forms of amphotericin B, such as Abelcet, are better tolerated and can be given at a much higher dose and should therefore be considered in patients who fail on or are intolerant to the conventional agent. Aspergillosis is the second most frequent fungal infection in neutropenic patients. Primary invasive aspergillosis usually presents on chest X-ray with lung lesions and the brain is a frequent site of secondary infection. Fluconazole is inactive against Aspergillus spp. and amphotericin B is the standard treatment. Again, lipid-based forms are better tolerated than the conventional formulation in this setting, and have been shown to achieve response rates of 60% or more in a number of trials. Other potentially life-threatening fungal infections in which lipid-based amphotericin B may play an important therapeutic role in the future include cryptococcosis (increasingly problematic in AIDS patients), trichosporonosis, fusariosis and mucormycosis. Further randomized studies should be performed in a range of fungal infections to compare Abelcet with conventional amphotericin B and other lipid-based antifungal agents.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Guidelines for the management of patients with invasive candidiasis and mucosal candidiasis were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace the previous guidelines published in the 15 January 2004 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases and are intended for use by health care providers who care for patients who either have or are at risk of these infections. Since 2004, several new antifungal agents have become available, and several new studies have been published relating to the treatment of candidemia, other forms of invasive candidiasis, and mucosal disease, including oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis. There are also recent prospective data on the prevention of invasive candidiasis in high-risk neonates and adults and on the empiric treatment of suspected invasive candidiasis in adults. This new information is incorporated into this revised document.

Treatment of critically ill patients with candidemia

Early initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is crucial for the prognosis of any infection, especially in the critically ill patient. This is particularly true in the case of candidemia. However, the earlier an empirical antimicrobial regimen is started, the greater the probability of diagnostic error and the possibility of side-effects. Recent experience of the clinical efficacy and good tolerance of echinocandins in the treatment of candidemia obliges us to review the indications for empirical antifungal treatment and the choice of antifungal agent in the critically ill patient.

Anidulafungin in the treatment of patients with invasive candidiasis

Echinocandins have emerged as important agents for the treatment of invasive candidiasis. Forthcoming guidelines are expected to recommend an echinocandin agent as initial primary therapy in patients who are severely ill and/or have risk factors for azole resistance. Amphotericin B deoxycholate and fluconazole should be considered for initial therapy in specific populations. The echinocandin, anidulafungin, has been shown to have higher response rates compared with fluconazole in patients with invasive candidiasis. Additionally, patients treated with anidulafungin compared with patients receiving fluconazole have exhibited a trend toward improved survival. The three echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin) offer proven efficacy along with excellent side-effect profiles. While these three drugs have important differences, the empirical selection of an echinocandin should be based on the specific patient population, including clinical status, the suspected pathogen, and the susceptibility pattern at the institution. Once the Candida species is identified and its susceptibility is determined, clinicians should consider step-down therapy to either fluconazole or voriconazole, with possible conversion from intravenous to oral therapy.

Isavuconazole: a new and promising antifungal triazole for the treatment of invasive fungal infections

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Isavuconazole (BAL4815) is a promising novel broad-spectrum triazole in late-stage clinical development that has proven to be active in vitro against Aspergillus, Candida and Cryptococcus neoformans, the most common agents of IFIs. Furthermore, isavuconazole has a pharmacokinetic profile that allows oral and intravenous administration with no severe toxicity. In vivo data from animal models are also encouraging. However, very little information on clinical efficacy is available. Four clinical trials are currently in progress to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of isavuconazole for the treatment and prevention of IFIs. In the absence of clinical and cost data, the real possibilities of this agent as a competitor for the treatment and prevention of IFIs in the clinical setting are still unknown.

Antifungals in the ICU

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Invasive fungal infections remain a serious complication for critically ill ICU patients. The aim of this article is to review recent efficacy data of newer antifungal agents for the treatment of invasive candidiasis. The influence that recent epidemiological trends, advances in diagnostic testing, and risk prediction methods exert on the optimization of antifungal therapy for critically ill ICU patients will also be reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent clinical trials have documented the clinical efficacy of the echinocandins and the newer triazoles for the management of invasive candidiasis. Thus far, resistance to echinocandins remains rare. Changes in the epidemiology of Candida spp. causing invasive candidiasis, such as an increasing relative proportion of non-albicans Candida spp., have not been universally reported, although they have important implications for the use of fluconazole as first-line therapy for invasive candidiasis. Efforts to improve the timeliness and accuracy of laboratory diagnostic techniques and clinical prediction models to allow early and accurately targeted antifungal intervention strategies continue.

SUMMARY

Echinocandins, given their clinical efficacy, spectrum of activity, and favourable pharmacological properties, are likely to replace fluconazole as initial antifungal agents of choice among critically ill ICU patients. The optimization of patient outcomes will require more accurately targeted early antifungal intervention strategies based upon sensitive and specific biological and clinical markers of risk.

Therapeutic drug monitoring for triazoles

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Invasive fungal infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, and mechanisms to optimize therapeutic outcomes are urgently required. Therapeutic drug monitoring represents an important component for the routine use of the triazoles.

RECENT FINDINGS

Triazoles have revolutionized the prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infections. Increasing data suggest that this class displays important concentration-effect and concentration-toxicity relationships. There has been an increased understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of triazoles, and this has facilitated the identification of concentrations (or drug exposures) that are both effective and nontoxic. This review discusses the application of therapeutic drug monitoring to fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole.

SUMMARY

Therapeutic drug monitoring represents an important mechanism to optimize the outcome of immunocompromised patients receiving triazoles.

Recommendations for the treatment of established fungal infections

Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of established fungal infections in the adult haematology/oncology setting were developed by a national consensus working group representing clinicians, pharmacists and microbiologists. These updated guidelines replace the previous guidelines published in the Internal Medicine Journal by Slavin et al. in 2004. The guidelines are pathogen-specific and cover the treatment of the most common fungal infections including candidiasis, aspergillosis, cryptococcosis, zygomycosis, fusariosis, scedosporiosis, and dermatophytosis. Recommendations are provided for management of refractory disease or salvage therapies, and special sites of infections such as the cerebral nervous system and the eye. Because of the widespread use newer broad-spectrum triazoles in prophylaxis and empiric therapy, these guidelines should be implemented in concert with the updated prophylaxis and empiric therapy guidelines published by this group.

Double-blind active-control trials: beware the comparator you keep

The indirect impact of the known comparator drug in double-blind comparative clinical trials of novel agents is underappreciated, despite its potentially pernicious effects. This hypothesis-generating analysis illustrates potential spillover effects of a comparator (amphotericin) in the evaluation of the first member (caspofungin) of a novel class (echinocandins) of antifungal drugs. Reported rates of drug-related fever in the first 3 studies of caspofungin for the treatment of mucosal candidiasis in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection were retrospectively analyzed. We compared patients who received 50 mg of caspofungin per day in a double-blind trial that used fluconazole as the comparator with patients who received the corresponding dosage in 2 similar earlier studies that used amphotericin as the comparator. With respect to the incidence of drug-related fever, the difference between the concurrent caspofungin and fluconazole groups was less than the difference between caspofungin groups from studies that used different comparators. In phase II/III blinded, active-control trials, the reporting of adverse experiences attributed to a first-in-class drug might be confounded to a variable degree by expectations regarding a well-known comparator.

Candidemia in the 21st century

The 21st century has brought forth vast innovations in the healthcare field. The availability and use of aggressive chemotherapeutic and immunosuppressive agents as well as broad-spectrum antibacterial agents has created a large population of patients who are at increased risk of acquiring infections with fungal organisms, especially Candida species. This review will focus on the changing epidemiology of candidal bloodstream infections, its impact on healthcare and new advances in the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia.

Treatment of invasive candidal infections: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare available antifungal treatments for invasive candidiasis, a leading cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared different antifungal agents for the treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis. Two reviewers independently appraised the quality of trials and extracted data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were microbiological failure, treatment failure, and adverse events. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled.

RESULTS

Of the 15 included trials, 9 compared fluconazole with other drugs (amphotericin B, itraconazole, or a combination of fluconazole and amphotericin B), 4 compared echinocandins with other drugs (fluconazole, amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B), 1 compared micafungin and caspofungin, and 1 compared amphotericin B plus fluconazole and voriconazole. No difference in mortality was observed with fluconazole vs amphotericin B (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.72-1.17); however, the rate of microbiological failure increased in the fluconazole arm (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.07). Anidulafungin decreased the rate of microbiological failure compared with fluconazole (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.86) with fewer adverse events. Caspofungin was comparable to amphotericin B in mortality and efficacy, with fewer adverse events requiring discontinuation (RR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.36). Micafungin was comparable to liposomal amphotericin B in mortality.

CONCLUSION

All assessed antifungal agents showed similar efficacy, but the rate of microbiological failure increased with fluconazole vs amphotericin B or anidulafungin. Amphotericin B is associated with a higher rate of adverse events than fluconazole and echinocandins.