High-dose, short-course levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia: a new treatment paradigm

Principles of antibiotic treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the outpatient setting

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common illness with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Nearly 80% of the treatment for this condition is provided in the outpatient setting. Among the etiologic agents associated with bacterial CAP, the predominant pathogen is Streptococcus pneumoniae. Treatment of CAP for the most part is empirical; therefore, any antibiotic treatment should cover both typical and atypical pathogens. The beta-lactams have historically been considered standard therapy for the treatment of CAP. However, the impact of rising resistance rates is now a primary concern facing physicians. For patients with comorbidities or recent antibiotic therapy, current guidelines recommend either combination therapy with a beta-lactam and a macrolide or an antipneumococcal fluoroquinolone alone. Fluoroquinolones are broad-spectrum antibiotics that exhibit high levels of penetration into the lungs and low levels of resistance. Evidence from clinical trials indicates clinical success rates of > 90% for moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and levofloxacin in the treatment of CAP due to S pneumoniae. Data from comparative clinical trials suggest fluoroquinolone monotherapy is as efficacious as beta-lactam-macrolide combination therapy in the treatment of CAP patients. The respiratory fluoroquinolone levofloxacin has also been shown to be effective in CAP patients for the treatment of macrolide-resistant S pneumoniae. The use of azithromycin, telithromycin, and fluoroquinolones in short-course regimens has been shown to be efficacious, safe, and tolerable in patients with CAP. Based on clinical evidence, high-dose, short-course therapies may represent a significant advance in the management of CAP.

Antimicrobial treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in the hospital setting

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) that may require hospitalization include acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), which includes ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) is treated similar to HAP and may be considered with HAP. For CAP requiring hospitalization, the current guidelines for the treatments of RTIs generally recommend either a beta-lactam and macrolide combination or a fluoroquinolone. The respiratory fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gemifloxacin) are excellent antibiotics due to high levels of susceptibility among gram-negative, gram-positive, and atypical pathogens. The fluoroquinolones are active against > 98% of Streptococcus pneumoniae, including penicillin-resistant strains. Fluoroquinolones are also recommended for AECB requiring hospitalization. Evidence from clinical trials suggests that levofloxacin monotherapy is as efficacious as combination ceftriaxone-erythromycin therapy in the treatment of patients hospitalized with CAP. For early-onset HAP, VAP, and HCAP without the risk of multidrug resistance, ceftriaxone, ampicillin-sulbactam, ertapenem, or one of the fluoroquinolones is recommended. High-dose, short-course therapy regimens may offer improved treatment due to higher drug concentrations, more rapid killing, increased adherence, and the potential to reduce development of resistance. Recent studies have shown that short-course therapy with levofloxacin, azithromycin, or telithromycin in patients with CAP was effective, safe, and tolerable and may control the rate of resistance.

A clinician's guide to the appropriate and accurate use of antibiotics: the Council for Appropriate and Rational Antibiotic Therapy (CARAT) criteria

In response to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, leading to increasing bacterial resistance and decreasing development of new antibiotics, the Council for Appropriate and Rational Antibiotic Therapy (CARAT) has developed criteria to guide appropriate and accurate antibiotic selection. The criteria, which are aimed at optimizing antibiotic therapy, include evidence-based results, therapeutic benefits, safety, optimal drug for the optimal duration, and cost-effectiveness.

Bench-to-bedside review: antimicrobial utilization strategies aimed at preventing the emergence of bacterial resistance in the intensive care unit

Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as one of the most important issues complicating the management of critically ill patients with infection. This is largely due to the increasing presence of pathogenic microorganisms with resistance to existing antimicrobial agents resulting in the administration of inappropriate treatment. Effective strategies for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance within intensive care units are available and should be aggressively implemented. The importance of preventing antimicrobial resistance is magnified by the limited availability of new antimicrobial drug classes for the foreseeable future.

Clinical efficacy of newer agents in short-duration therapy for community-acquired pneumonia

Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most important respiratory tract pathogen implicated in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), is becoming increasingly resistant in vitro to the beta -lactams and macrolides, and fluoroquinolone resistance has been detected. A growing body of evidence suggests that prolonged antimicrobial use may contribute directly and indirectly to increased antimicrobial resistance among common respiratory pathogens. Long-term exposure to antimicrobial agents, especially less-potent agents, directly increases selection pressure for resistance. Indirectly, poor patient compliance, multiple daily dosing, and the increased risk of adverse events further complicate the resistance issue and diminish the efficacy of long-term antimicrobial use. Controlled clinical trials addressing the appropriate duration of therapy for CAP are lacking. However, available data suggest that with appropriate antibiotic selection, based on appropriate spectrum, potency, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, lower respiratory tract infections in outpatients can be successfully treated in <7 days rather than the 7-14 days currently recommended.

Pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP)

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin in patients with respiratory infections such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are poorly documented. This work aimed at assessing the pharmacodynamic target attainment against Streptococcus pneumoniae using levofloxacin 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg administered once daily in plasma (P) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in elderly (>/=65 years) compared with younger patients (<65 years) hospitalized with CAP were simulated. Susceptibility data with S. pneumoniae from our ongoing national surveillance study (Canadian Respiratory Organism Susceptibility Study-CROSS) were then used to produce pharmacodynamic indices of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all.) Monte Carlo simulations were then used to analyse target attainment of levofloxacin using doses of 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily to achieve free drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) >/= 30-100 versus S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP. Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin simulated after 500 mg, 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily dosing resulted in levofloxacin volume of distribution: elderly patients = younger patients, while levofloxacin clearance was: elderly patients < younger patients. Levofloxacin t(1/2) values were longer in elderly patients (9.8 +/- 2.5h) than younger patients with CAP (7.4 +/- 2.5h). Free levofloxacin AUC(0-24) as well as AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) for S. pneumoniae were higher in elderly patients than younger patients. Monte Carlo simulation using levofloxacin 500 mg yielded probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P and ELF (95.7% and 98.1%) in elderly and younger patients (72.7% and 80.6%) respectively. Levofloxacin 750 mg and 1000 mg once daily had probability of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in P/ELF of 98.1%/98.6% and 99.2%/99.0%, respectively, in elderly patients compared with 89.9%/94.1% and 95.2%/96.5%, respectively, for younger patients. Probability of achieving of AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 100 in P or ELF was very low in both patient populations at different doses except in the case of elderly patients receiving levofloxacin in a dose of 1000 mg once daily P/ELF of 78.5%/87.0%. We conclude that levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with CAP are markedly different from those of younger patients. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in both plasma and epithelial lining fluid in patients with CAP including younger patients. Levofloxacin 500 mg OD provides high probabilities of achieving free-drug AUC(0-24)/MIC(all) of 30 in elderly patients with CAP, although we favour the 750 mg dosing in these patients as well. Levofloxacin 750 mg OD results in high probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment and improved bacteriological outcome against S. pneumoniae in patients with CAP.

Antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common disorder that is potentially life-threatening, especially in older adults and patients with comorbid disease. Despite substantial progress in therapeutic options, CAP remains a primary cause of death from infectious disease in the United States. The mainstay of treatment for most patients is appropriate antimicrobial therapy This article reviews the principles for initial antimicrobial therapy, highlights some of the differences in approaches to antimicrobial drug selection in selected guidelines, and includes new recommendations for empiric and pathogen-directed therapy of CAP.

Levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization

Consecutive adult patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia from January 2000 to September 2003 were included in this prospective observational cohort study. A total of 459 patients, 259 treated with levofloxacin in single drug therapy at a dose of 500 mg once a day and 209 with the combination of ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin at a dose of 2 g once a day and 500 mg every 12 h, respectively, were included. The hospital admission decision was made using a clinical guideline based on the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). Fifteen (6%) patients died in the group treated with levofloxacin in single drug therapy and 25 (12%) in the group treated with ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin (P = 0.024). The mortality differences between both treatment groups, adjusted by the PSI score, show an OR of 0.39 (95% CI 0.17-0.87). There were no statistically significant differences between the duration of treatments or hospital stay. These data suggest that levofloxacin as single drug therapy is more effective than the combination of ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin in the treatment of moderate to severe pneumonia that requires hospitalization.

Value of short-course antimicrobial therapy in community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-compliance with therapy may be associated with deterioration in the patient's condition, treatment failure, and increased use and cost of healthcare resources such as the requirement for additional drugs and hospital admission. Adherence to the prescribed regimen is affected by a number of variables including dosing interval, treatment duration, adverse effects, and palatability in pediatric patients. Accumulating evidence suggests that short-course antimicrobial therapy may be at least as effective as, and in some cases may be more effective than, traditional longer therapies (7-14 days) even in hospital-acquired pneumonia. Given the unique pharmacokinetic properties of azithromycin, attempts have been made to condense the traditional total dose over a 3-5-day period into single-dose therapy with the aim of improving treatment compliance. The results of two phase III CAP trials indicate that a single 2.0 g dose of azithromycin microspheres is a suitable alternative to 7 days of either clarithromycin XL or levofloxacin.

A multidisciplinary approach to antimicrobial stewardship: evolution into the 21st century

In the 21st century, we face the problems of escalating antibiotic resistance, difficult-to-treat infections and slowed new drug development. Healthcare practitioners are increasingly recognising the importance of good antimicrobial stewardship. Various strategies such as formulary management, prior approval, clinical pathways, post-prescribing evaluation and intravenous to oral conversion have been used singly or in combination to improve prescribing and reduce costs. Combining a multifaceted approach with a full-time dedicated multidisciplinary team appears to be capable of yielding satisfactory clinical and economic outcomes and most importantly, sustaining efforts of antimicrobial stewardship. The multidisciplinary approach to antibiotic management should be tailored to fit the individual needs of an institution. More data are needed to document effects on curbing resistance.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Community-acquired pneumonia remains a prevalent and potentially life-threatening infection. In general, the disease is considered severe when inpatient care including ICU admission is required, and this often suggests a poorer prognosis. Severe community-acquired pneumonia continues to be an important subject of research from different perspectives, including assessment of illness severity, etiology, diagnostic tests, and treatment options. The aim of this descriptive review is to comment on the results of the relevant original articles in this area published since April 1, 2003.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main themes in the literature covered by the review include the time course of serum concentrations of different markers of the inflammatory response, validation of severity scores to optimize hospital and ICU admission, outcome improvement (duration of therapy and optimal dosing, time to antibiotic administration, adequate initial treatment, and the impact of positive microbiological diagnosis on management and prognosis), and the efficacy of new antimicrobials.

SUMMARY

The usefulness of inflammatory markers to assess the outcome of the disease is unclear. Data on severity scores are conclusive and different validated and simple predictive rules are available for the classification of patients into risk classes. Therapeutic strategies that have been investigated confirm the impact of adequate empiric antibiotic treatment on clinical outcome and the equivalence between short and long courses in the duration of therapy. A definitive beneficial effect of early administration of antimicrobials or the knowledge of the etiology of pneumonia on the clinical course of the disease has not been demonstrated.

The newer fluoroquinolones

This article discusses the newer fluoroquinolones in detail with respect to their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and spectrum of in vitro activity. The newer agents are compared and contrasted with the older ones, particularly ciprofloxacin. Efficacy of the newer fluoroquinolones when compared with antimicrobial agents in other classes is also presented in detail. Appropriate use of the newer fluoroquinolones is addressed, including their ever expanding role in the treatment of both upper and lower respiratory tract infections and skin and soft tissue infection. Available data on the use of the newer fluoroquinolones in the management of genitourinary tract infections, gastrointestinal infections, and osteomyelitis are also discussed.

Clinical implications of 750 mg, 5-day levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the time to symptom resolution and i.v.-to-p.o. transition in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients treated with 750 mg or 500 mg levofloxacin.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A retrospective, subset analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing 750 mg levofloxacin for 5 days to 500 mg levofloxacin for 10 days for the treatment of CAP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 528 CAP patients were included. Baseline symptoms were re-evaluated on Day 3 of therapy, and time to i.v.-to-p.o. transition was recorded for inpatients.

RESULTS

For the overall population, 67.4% of patients receiving 750 mg levofloxacin had resolution of fever by Day 3 of therapy, compared to 54.6% of 500 mg treated patients (P = 0.006). Patients who started on 750 mg levofloxacin i.v. (N = 108) transitioned to p.o. in an average of 2.68 days while those starting on 500 mg i.v. (N = 124) transitioned in 2.95 days (P = 0.144). The median time for i.v.-to-p.o. switch was 2.35 days and 2.75 days for patients receiving 750 mg and 500 mg levofloxacin, respectively (P = 0.098, log rank test). By Day 3 of therapy, 68% of patients receiving the 750 mg dose had transitioned from i.v. to p.o. levofloxacin, compared with 61% of the 500 mg group (P = 0.280). The safety profiles were comparable for the two regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The 750 mg levofloxacin dose resulted in a greater proportion of patients with resolution of CAP symptoms by Day 3 when compared with 500 mg therapy. Consequently, the 750 mg regimen trended toward more rapid transition to p.o., potentially resulting in lower overall drug costs. Time to switch from i.v. to p.o. was determined by the investigators' discretion rather than a set protocol. Additionally, length of stay data was not collected in this study, which can significantly impact overall healthcare costs. Further research is required to fully understand the economic impact of the 750 mg, 5-day levofloxacin regimen.

Levofloxacin Efficacy in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Legionellosis

BACKGROUND

Although fluoroquinolones possess excellent in vitro activity against Legionella, few large-scale clinical trials have examined their efficacy in the treatment of Legionnaires disease. Even fewer studies have applied rigorous criteria for diagnosis of community-acquired Legionnaires disease, including culture of respiratory secretions on selective media.

METHODS

Data from six clinical trials encompassing 1,997 total patients have been analyzed to determine the efficacy of levofloxacin (500 mg qd or 750 mg qd) in treating patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to Legionella.

RESULTS

Of the 1,997 total patients with CAP from the clinical trials, 75 patients had infection with a Legionella species. Demographics showed a large portion of these patients were < 55 years of age and nonsmokers. More than 90% of mild-to-moderate and severe cases of Legionella infection resolved clinically at the posttherapy visit, 2 to 14 days after treatment termination. No deaths were reported for any patient with Legionnaires disease treated with levofloxacin during the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Levofloxacin was efficacious at both 500 mg for 7 to 14 days and 750 mg for 5 days. Legionnaires disease is not associated only with smokers, the elderly, and the immunosuppressed, but also has the potential to affect a broader demographic range of the general population than previously thought.

Safety and tolerability of fluoroquinolones

Clinical trials in patients with community- and hospital-acquired infections have established that the clinical effectiveness and safety of fluoroquinolones are similar to beta-lactam and macrolide agents. The most common drug-related adverse effects (AEs) with fluoroquinolone therapy involve the gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system and are usually transient and mild to moderate in severity. However, serious toxic reactions have led to the limited and restrictive use of trovafloxacin in the United States and the withdrawal of temafloxacin and grepafloxacin from worldwide markets. In addition, postmarketing spontaneous AE reports have imposed updates in the precautions and warning sections of product package inserts of selected fluoroquinolones. This article reviews the AEs associated with the fluoroquinolones and compares the safety profiles of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin.

Clinical relevance of antimicrobial resistance in the management of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia

Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most common bacterial cause of community-acquired pneumonia, and these infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. A major concern is the increasing incidence of antibiotic resistance among pneumococcal isolates, which, in the case of certain of the antibiotic classes, has been associated with treatment failure. Yet despite multiple reports of infections with penicillin-resistant pneumococcal isolates, no cases of bacteriologic failure have been documented with the use of penicillin or ampicillin in the treatment of pneumonia caused by penicillin-resistant pneumococci. Current prevalence and levels of penicillin resistance among pneumococal isolates in most areas of the world do not indicate a need for substantial treatment changes with regard to the use of the penicillins. For infections with penicillin-sensitive strains, penicillin or an aminopenicillin in a standard dosage will still be effective for treatment. In the cases of strains with intermediate resistance, beta-lactam agents are still considered appropriate treatment, although higher dosages are recommended. Infections with isolates of high-level penicillin resistance should be treated with alternative agents such as the third-generation cephalosporins or the new antipneumococcal fluoroquinolones. In the case of the cephalosporins, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic parameters help predict which of those agents are likely to be successful, and the less active agents should not be used. Debate continues in the literature with regard to the impact of macrolide resistance on the outcome of pneumococcal pneumonia, with some investigators providing evidence of an "in vivo-in vitro paradox," referring to discordance between reported in vitro resistance and clinical success of macrolides/azalide in vivo. However, several cases of macrolide/azalide treatment failure have been documented, and many clinicians recommend that these agents not be used on their own in areas with a high prevalence and levels of macrolide/azalide resistance. However, evidence is emerging to show beneficial effects on outcome with combination therapy, especially that of a beta-lactam agent and a macrolide given together to sicker, hospitalized patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. In an attempt to prevent the emergence of resistance, it has been recommended by some that the new fluoroquinolones not be used routinely as first-line agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia; instead, they say, these agents should be reserved for patients who are allergic to the commonly used beta-lactam agents, for infections known to be or suspected of being caused by highly resistant strains, and for patients in whom initial therapy has failed.

Levofloxacin: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections in the United States

Levofloxacin (Levaquin) is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent with a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and atypical respiratory pathogens. It is active against both penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. The prevalence of S. pneumoniae resistance to levofloxacin is <1% overall in the US.A number of randomised comparative trials in the US have demonstrated the efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of infections of the respiratory tract, genitourinary tract, skin and skin structures. Sequential intravenous to oral levofloxacin 750mg once daily for 7-14 days was as effective in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia as intravenous imipenem/cilastatin 500-1000mg every 6-8 hours followed by oral ciprofloxacin 750mg twice daily in one study. In patients with mild to severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7-14 days achieved clinical and bacteriological response rates similar to those with comparator agents, including amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, clarithromycin, azithromycin, ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil and gatifloxacin. A recent study indicates that intravenous or oral levofloxacin 750mg once daily for 5 days is as effective as 500mg once daily for 10 days, in the treatment of mild to severe CAP. Exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute maxillary sinusitis respond well to treatment with oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7 and 10-14 days, respectively. Oral levofloxacin was as effective as ofloxacin in uncomplicated urinary tract infections and ciprofloxacin or lomefloxacin in complicated urinary tract infections. In men with chronic bacterial prostatitis treated for 28 days, oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily achieved similar clinical and bacteriological response rates to oral ciprofloxacin 500mg twice daily. Uncomplicated skin infections responded well to oral levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7-10 days, while in complicated skin infections intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin 750mg for 7-14 days was at least as effective as intravenous ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (+/- switch to oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) administered for the same duration. Levofloxacin is generally well tolerated, with the most frequently reported adverse events being nausea and diarrhoea; in comparison with some other quinolones it has a low photosensitising potential and clinically significant cardiac and hepatic adverse events are rare.

CONCLUSION

Levofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent with activity against a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and atypical organisms. It provides clinical and bacteriological efficacy in a range of infections, including those caused by both penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. Levofloxacin is well tolerated, and is associated with few of the phototoxic, cardiac or hepatic adverse events seen with some other quinolones. It also has a pharmacokinetic profile that is compatible with once-daily administration and allows for sequential intravenous to oral therapy. The recent approvals in the US for use in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and chronic bacterial prostatitis, and the introduction of a short-course, high-dose regimen for use in CAP, further extend the role of levofloxacin in treating bacterial infections.

Efficacy of 750-mg, 5-day levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia caused by atypical pathogens

BACKGROUND

Current recommended durations for treatment of atypical community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) range from 10 to 21 days. However, antibiotics such as the fluoroquinolones may allow for effective, short-course regimens.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the efficacy of 750 mg levofloxacin for 5 days compared to a 500-mg, 10-day levofloxacin regimen for the treatment of atypical CAP.

METHODS

A randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted within the United States. Of the 528 patients enrolled in the study, 149 were diagnosed with CAP due to Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia pneumoniae, or Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Patients' baseline symptoms were re-evaluated on Day 3 of therapy. Clinical efficacy and resolution of CAP symptoms were evaluated at the posttherapy visit (7-14 days after the last dose of active drug).

RESULTS

This report represents a subgroup analysis of a previous clinical study. Among the 123 clinically evaluable patients diagnosed with atypical CAP (26 patients were unevaluable), the clinical success rates were 95.5% (63 of 66 patients) for the 750-mg group and 96.5% (55 of 57 patients) for the 500-mg group (95% CI for success rate of the 500-mg group minus that of the 750-mg group, -6.8 to 8.8). At the poststudy evaluation (31-38 days after treatment began), relapse occurred in </= 2% of patients in either treatment group. Among patients diagnosed with atypical CAP, the 750-mg therapy resulted in more rapid symptom resolution, with a significantly greater proportion of patients experiencing resolution of fever by Day 3 of therapy (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

The 750-mg, 5-day course of levofloxacin was at least as effective as the 500-mg, 10-day regimen for atypical CAP. Additionally, the 750-mg, short-course levofloxacin therapy may reduce total antimicrobial drug usage and more rapidly relieve pneumonia symptoms.

New Insights in the Treatment by Levofloxacin

Levofloxacin is widely regarded as one of the most important fluoroquinolones available today. It possesses excellent activity against a wide range of important pathogens, including those resistant to many other antimicrobials. While rates of resistance to other previously useful antimicrobial classes has grown, levofloxacin has maintained its efficacy, with generally very low rates of resistance around the world. It is indicated for a wide range of infections including community-acquired respiratory infections in adults, particularly community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), and acute sinusitis. In addition, it is recommended for infections of skin and soft tissue, and the urinary tract. With postmarketing surveillance data available for the last decade, levofloxacin possesses an unparalleled database to demonstrate its clinical efficacy and safety. Remarkably, levofloxacin continues to expand its list of indications. The development of a new high-dose 750-mg schedule has the potential to decrease the duration of treatment as well as reduce the emergence of resistance.

A new dosing paradigm: High-dose, short-course fluoroquinolone therapy for community-acquired pneumonia

The goals of optimal antimicrobial therapy are to treat infection effectively, to improve the clinical condition of the patient, and to prevent the emergence of resistant bacterial strains. For ideal drug usage the World Health Organization recommends administering the correct drug by the best route, in the right amount, at optimum intervals for the appropriate period, and after an accurate diagnosis. This article discusses the use of high-dose, short-course fluoroquinolone therapy as an effective option for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.