The Effect of Molecular Rapid Diagnostic Testing on Clinical Outcomes in Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rapid Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Blood for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections: A Mini-Review

Staphylococcus aureus represents a major human pathogen able to cause a number of infections, especially bloodstream infections (BSI). Clinical use of methicillin has led to the emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and MRSA-BSI have been reported to be associated with high morbidity and mortality. Clinical diagnosis of BSI is based on the results from blood culture that, although considered the gold standard method, is time-consuming. For this reason, rapid diagnostic tests to identify the presence of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA isolates directly in blood cultures are being used with increasing frequency to rapidly commence targeted antimicrobial therapy, also in the light of antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Here, we review and report the most common rapid non-molecular and molecular methods currently available to detect the presence of MRSA directly from blood.

Antimicrobial Stewardship: What the Clinical Laboratory Needs to Know

Misuse of antibiotics, including unnecessary use or inappropriate selection, may result in side effects and poor outcome in individual patients, as well as contribute to the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship programs exist to reduce such misuse of antibiotics and ill effect in order to promote patient outcome. The importance of diagnostics, antibiogram data, possible interventions, and impact are reviewed. It is essential for clinical microbiologists and other health care members to understand the field and scope of antimicrobial stewardship, actively participate in, and understand the value they bring to supporting their institution's efforts.

Multi-Institutional Predictors of Antibiotic Resistance in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Urosepsis Secondary to Ureteral Obstruction

Introduction and Objective: Patients presenting with a urinary tract infection with kidney or ureteral stones is a urologic emergency often achieve early clinical stability but remain hospitalized while awaiting results from urine antibiotic sensitivity analyses. We aimed to identify clinical predictors of antibiotic resistance in patients who underwent urgent urinary tract decompression for sepsis and obstructive urolithiasis to facilitate early discharge on empiric oral antibiotics. Methods: Patients who underwent emergent urinary tract decompression for sepsis and an obstructing ureteral stone from 2014 to 2018 at two academic medical institutions were identified. Emergent stent placement was performed and patients were treated with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. We assessed the association between clinical parameters at the time of presentation and resistance to at least one antibiotic from urine culture using the Wilcoxon test and Fisher exact test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was then performed using all significant variables from univariate analysis. Results: Out of 134 patients, 84 patients (62.7%) had urine cultures resistant to at least one antibiotic. On univariate analysis, patients with resistant cultures were significantly more likely to have had previous ureteroscopy, require postoperative intensive care unit-level care, have bacteremia, and a longer length of stay. In multivariate analysis using significant variables from univariate analysis, only previous ureteroscopy was significantly associated with antibiotic resistance with an increased odds of 6.95 (p = 0.011). Conclusions: In this study, we show that a history of ureteroscopy is significantly associated with antibiotic resistance in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Our findings suggest that patients with history of ureteroscopy should await urine culture results, while those without a history of ureteroscopy may be discharged early on empiric oral antibiotics. However, future studies are necessary to determine the effectiveness of this predictor.

The Evolving Role of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory in Identifying Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria: An Update

The evolution of resistance to antimicrobial agents in gram-negatives has challenged the role of the clinical microbiology laboratory to implement new methods for their timely detection. Recent development has enabled the use of novel methods for more rapid pathogen identification, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and detection of resistance markers. Commonly used methods improve the rapidity of resistance detection from both cultured bacteria and specimens. This review focuses on the commercially available systems available together with their technical performance and possible clinical impact.

Advances in rapid diagnostics for bloodstream infections

Septicemia from bloodstream infections (BSI) is the second largest cause of inpatient mortality and the single most expensive condition for US hospitals to manage. There has been an explosive development of commercial diagnostic systems to accelerate the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of causative pathogens. Despite adoption of advanced technologies like matrix-assisted laser desorption imaging-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for rapid identification, clinical impact has been variable, in part due to the persistent need for conventional AST as well as prescriber understanding of these rapidly evolving platforms. Newer technologies are expanding on rapid detection of genotypic determinants of resistance, but only recently has rapid phenotypic AST been available. Yet, improved outcomes with rapid diagnostic platforms are still most evident in conjunction with active antimicrobial stewardship. This review will outline key advancements in rapid diagnostics for BSI and the role of antimicrobial stewardship in this new era.

Modern Blood Culture: Management Decisions and Method Options

The optimal care of septic patients depends on the successful recovery of clinically relevant microorganisms from blood cultures and the timely reporting of organism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results. Many preanalytic factors play a critical role in culturing microorganisms, and advancements in blood culture instrument technology have reduced the time to positive results. Additionally, rapid organism identification and AST results directly from positive blood culture broth via new methods help to further shorten the time from empiric to targeted treatment. This article summarizes the current state of blood culture methods, including preanalytic, analytical, and postanalytic factors that are available to clinical microbiology laboratories.

Management of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections in the Era of Rapid Diagnostic Testing: Impact With and Without Antibiotic Stewardship

Background

Verigene Blood-Culture Gram-Negative is a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that detects gram-negatives (GNs) and resistance within hours from gram stain. The majority of the data support the use of RDTs with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention in gram-positive bloodstream infection (BSI). Less is known about GN BSI.

Methods

This was a retrospective quasi-experimental (nonrandomized) study of adult patients with RDT-target GN BSI comparing patients pre-RDT/AMS vs post-RDT/pre-AMS vs post-RDT/AMS. Optimal therapy was defined as appropriate coverage with the narrowest spectrum, accounting for source and co-infecting organisms. Time to optimal therapy was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Eight-hundred thirty-two patients were included; 237 pre-RDT/AMS vs 308 post-RDT/pre-AMS vs 237 post-RDT/AMS, respectively. The proportion of patients on optimal antibiotic therapy increased with each intervention (66.5% vs 78.9% vs 83.2%; P < .0001). Time to optimal therapy (interquartile range) decreased with introduction of RDT: 47 (7.9–67.7) hours vs 24.9 (12.4–55.2) hours vs 26.5 (10.3–66.5) hours (P = .09). Using multivariable modeling, infectious diseases (ID) consult was an effect modifier. Within the ID consult stratum, controlling for source and ICU stay, compared with the pre-RDT/AMS group, both post-RDT/pre-AMS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04–1.72) and post-RDT/AMS (aHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.01–1.64), improved time to optimal therapy. This effect was not seen in the stratum without ID consult.

Conclusions

With the introduction of RDT and AMS, both proportion and time to optimal antibiotic therapy improved, especially among those with an existing ID consult. This study highlights the beneficial role of RDTs in GN BSI.

Clinical impact of pharmacist-directed antimicrobial stewardship guidance following blood culture rapid diagnostic testing

BACKGROUND

Rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) has been shown to be associated with improved clinical outcomes.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of using RDT paired with well-defined pharmacist-directed antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) guidance to achieve targeted treatment in patients with bacteraemia.

METHODS

In this quasi-study, a retrospective (pre-intervention) phase was compared with a prospective (post-intervention) phase. Adult patients with positive blood cultures identified using the BacT/ALERT system were included. Bacterial identification and susceptibility were provided by VITEK 2. During the post-intervention phase, Verigene ASP guidance was developed to optimize antibiotic selection. Pharmacists received the results from the microbiology laboratory, evaluated the appropriateness of current therapy (if any), and communicated the recommended antimicrobial therapy to the treating physician accordingly.

FINDINGS

The cohort consisted of 164 patients in the pre-intervention group and 148 patients in the post-intervention group. When comparing the post-intervention period with the pre-intervention period, the median time to culture identification was 22 vs 96 h (P<0.0001), median time to targeted antibiotics was 2 vs 22 h (P<0.0001), median time for antibiotic de-escalation was 12.2 vs 27 h (P<0.0001), and median time to escalation was 1.3 vs 24 h (P<0.003), respectively. In-hospital mortality and 30-day re-admission were significantly lower in the post-intervention group (P<0.003 and 0.034, respectively). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the post-intervention group (6.5 vs 8 days; P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Rapid identification of bacteraemia combined with a pharmacist's recommendation as an ASP initiative significantly improved time to optimal therapy, and may have decreased the risk of mortality and re-admission.

Clinical impact of rapid susceptibility testing on MHR-SIR directly from blood cultures

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, we demonstrated that rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs) can be performed directly on blood culture samples tested on Mueller-Hinton Rapid agar (MHR-SIR) with a time delay of 6-8 h.

OBJECTIVES

Using this rapid disc diffusion method, we analysed the clinical impact associated with rapid reporting of results in our hospital setting.

METHODS

All patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) related to Enterobacteriaceae or Staphylococcus aureus were prospectively included in the study. The rapid ASTs were performed by incubation of positive blood cultures on MHR-SIR for 6-8 h by direct inoculation according to BSAC recommendations.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-seven patients with BSIs were included as MHR-guided adaptation therapy cases. Eighty percent had Enterobacteriaceae-related BSIs, of which 12 (9%) were ESBL producers and 20% were S. aureus-related BSIs. A urinary or intra-abdominal infection was observed in 44.3% and 19.8%, respectively, of Enterobacteriaceae-related infections. The most frequent sources of infections for S. aureus BSIs were cutaneous and endovascular, in 43% and 23% of cases, respectively. Forty-four percent of the patients benefited from therapeutic modification according to the results of the MHR-SIR AST. Thus, empirical antibiotic therapy was modified by using antibiotic therapy that had too wide a spectrum or was unsuitable in 26% and 18% of cases, respectively. Compared with the 24 h required for the reference method, the median length of time to provision of susceptibility test results by MHR-SIR was 7 h.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a significant time saving (17 h) on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription and demonstrated a significant impact regarding the choice and reduction of the spectrum of antibiotic therapy.

Clinical Performance and Impact of Accelerate Pheno for Gram-negative Bacteremia in Hospitalized Children

PURPOSE

Accelerate Pheno provides rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests (ASTs) of pathogens that cause blood stream infections (BSIs). The study objective was to assess the accuracy of the Accelerate Pheno platform and its impact on antimicrobial modification in children with gram-negative BSIs.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients at a children's hospital with gram-negative BSIs from November 2018 to November 2019. Proportion of agreement between Accelerate Pheno and standard of care (SOC) was determined for organism identification (matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry) and susceptibilities (MicroScan). Time from culture collection to Gram stain, identification and AST by the Accelerate Pheno method, and AST results by MicroScan were calculated. Antibiotic modifications and opportunities to optimize antimicrobial stewardship were recorded.

FINDINGS

Of 115 BSIs from 90 patients, 90 monomicrobial gram-negative BSIs with an organism included on the Accelerate Pheno panel were found. Compared with SOC, the organism was correctly identified in 90 patients (100%). Overall, 5 of 732 ASTs (0.7%) reported susceptible by Accelerate Pheno were resistant by SOC, and 8 of 109 (7.3%) reported resistant by Accelerate Pheno were susceptible by SOC. On the basis of the Accelerate Pheno AST results, antibiotic spectrum was increased in 10 of 11 instances to correct organism-drug mismatch and narrowed in 16 of 33 instances. Median times from culture collection to reporting of Gram stain, Accelerate Pheno identification, Accelerate Pheno AST, and SOC AST were 12.6, 14.6, 19.9, and 60.6 h, respectively. Median time to optimal therapy was 21.8 h for infections with actionable AST data.

IMPLICATIONS

Accelerate Pheno was accurate and decreased time to optimal therapy by almost 40 h for children with gram-negative BSIs. Antibiotic spectrum was increased in multiple instances, but opportunities to decrease spectrum were underused.

The Clinical Impact of Rapid Molecular Microbiological Diagnostics for Pathogen and Resistance Gene Identification in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review

Fast microbiological diagnostics (MDx) are needed to ensure early targeted antimicrobial treatment in sepsis. This systematic review focuses on the impact on antimicrobial management and patient outcomes of MDx for pathogen and resistance gene identification compared with blood cultures. PubMed was searched for clinical studies using either whole blood directly or after short-term incubation. Twenty-five articles were retrieved describing the outcomes of 8 different MDx. Three interventional studies showed a significant increase in appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy and a nonsignificant change in time to appropriate therapy. Impact on mortality was conflicting. Length of stay was significantly lower in 2 studies. A significant decrease in antimicrobial cost was demonstrated in 6 studies. The limitations of this systematic review include the low number and observed heterogeneity of clinical studies. In conclusion, potential benefits of MDx regarding antimicrobial management and some patient outcomes were reported. More rigorous intervention studies are needed focusing on the direct benefits for patients.

Antimicrobial Stewardship: From Bedside to Theory. Thirteen Examples of Old and More Recent Strategies from Everyday Clinical Practice

“Antimicrobial stewardship” is a strategy that promotes the responsible use of antimicrobials. The objective of this paper is to focus on consolidated and more recent improvements in clinical strategies that should be adopted in hospitalized patients to ameliorate their infectious diseases’ outcome and to reduce the antibiotic resistance risk through judicious use of antibiotics. We present 13 common clinical scenarios, the respective suggested interventions and the explanations of the supporting evidence, in order to help clinicians in their decision-making process. Strategies including the choice of antibiotic and dose optimization, antibiotic spectrum narrowing (de-escalation), shortening of duration, shift to oral route or outpatient parenteral antibiotic (including elastomeric pumps), and biomarkers are described and discussed.

[Organisational and staff requirements for antimicrobial stewardship activities in hospitals : Position paper of the Commission on Anti-Infectives, Resistance and Therapy (Commission ART) at the Robert Koch Institute, with advice from professional associations]

Increased awareness of the rising antimicrobial resistance problem and impending loss of suitable treatment options for infectious diseases have changed patient care. Antimicrobial/antibiotic stewardship (ABS) activities aiming to optimize antimicrobial treatment were specified in international (WHO, ECDC) and national programmes and evidence-based practice guidelines. In Germany, ABS in hospitals is enshrined in the Infection Protection Act §23 and in a national guideline. The position paper presents the goals and tasks of ABS as well as the necessary organisational and staff requirements.Qualified training and education, mandates and support from hospital directors, and the provision of sufficient resources are essential prerequisites for the successful work of the ABS team. The ABS team should work hospital-wide across clinical services. Their main tasks are developing and implementing an ABS programme tailored to local needs and the conditions of the hospital, taking into account anti-infective drug prescribing, the resistance situation and case mix. Their tasks also include drafting and implementing in-house recommendations for diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of important infectious diseases. The ABS team should be interdisciplinary and include specially qualified doctors and pharmacists. Doctors commissioned for ABS should support this team and take the department-specific concerns into account. The document specifies a minimum ABS staff of one full-time equivalent (FTE) per 500 beds. Depending on the case mix and specialties, additional staff may be required. It proposes that there should be 0.1 FTE doctors commissioned for ABS per 100 beds.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pathogens isolated from blood culture: a performance comparison of Accelerate Pheno™ and VITEK® 2 systems with the broth microdilution method

Objectives

To compare the performance of the Accelerate Pheno™ system with that of the conventional phenotypic VITEK® 2 system for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacterial pathogens from positive blood culture (PBC) samples, based on the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.

Methods

Prospectively collected PBCs that represented patient-unique bloodstream infection episodes were included. For PBC samples showing monomicrobial growth (n = 86), AST was performed using both Accelerate Pheno™ and VITEK® 2 systems directly from PBC broth. Colony isolates derived from subculture of PBC broth were then used for BMD testing. AST results were interpreted according to 2017 EUCAST breakpoints.

Results

The overall categorical agreement between Accelerate Pheno™ system and BMD was 92.7% (467/504) for Gram-negative organisms and 99.0% (95/96) for Gram-positive organisms, with rates for very major errors of 3.6% (6/166), major errors 2.2% (9/416) and minor errors 3.8% (23/600). The overall categorical agreement between the VITEK® 2 system and BMD was 91.7% (463/505) for Gram-negative organisms and 99.0% (97/98) for Gram-positive organisms, with rates of very major errors of 2.4% (4/169), major errors 1.0% (4/416) and minor errors 5.8% (35/603). Importantly, unlike the VITEK® 2 system, no false-susceptible results occurred with two colistin-resistant organism-growing PBCs tested using the Accelerate Pheno™ system.

Conclusions

Based on these findings, the Accelerate Pheno™ system can be a valid alternative for the rapid AST of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in bloodstream infections.

Impact of rapid diagnostics with antimicrobial stewardship support for children with positive blood cultures: A quasi-experimental study with time trend analysis

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the clinical impact of the implementation of VERIGENE gram-positive blood culture testing (BC-GP) coupled with antimicrobial stewardship result notification for children with positive blood cultures.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental study.

SETTING

Quaternary children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Hospitalized children aged 0-21 years with positive blood culture events 1 year before and 1 year after implementation of BC-GP testing.

METHODS

The primary outcome was time to optimal antibiotic therapy for positive blood cultures, defined as receiving definitive therapy without unnecessary antibiotics (pathogens) or no antibiotics (contaminants). Secondary outcomes were time to effective therapy, time to definitive therapy, and time to stopping vancomycin, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. Time-to-therapy outcomes before and after the intervention were compared using Cox regression models and interrupted time series analyses, adjusting for patient characteristics and trends over time. Gram-negative events were included as a nonequivalent dependent variable.

RESULTS

We included 264 preintervention events (191 gram-positive, 73 gram-negative) and 257 postintervention events (168 gram-positive, 89 gram-negative). The median age was 2.9 years (interquartile range, 0.3-10.1), and 418 pediatric patients (80.2%) had ≥1 complex chronic condition. For gram-positive isolates, implementation of BC-GP testing was associated with an immediate reduction in time to optimal therapy and time to stopping vancomycin for both analyses. BC-GP testing was associated with decreased time to definitive therapy in interrupted time series analysis but not Cox modeling. No such changes were observed for gram-negative isolates. No changes in time to effective therapy, length of stay, or mortality were associated with BC-GP.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of BC-GP testing coupled with antimicrobial stewardship result notification was associated with decreased time to optimal therapy and time to stopping vancomycin for hospitalized children with gram-positive blood culture isolates.

Clinical Impact of Accelerate PhenoTM Rapid Blood Culture Detection System in Bacteremic Patients

BACKGROUND

Accelerate Pheno blood culture detection system (AXDX) provides identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results within 8h of blood culture growth. Limited data exists regarding its clinical impact. Other rapid platforms coupled with antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) real-time notification (RTN) have shown improved length of stay (LOS) in bacteremia.

METHODS

A single-center, quasi-experimental study of adult bacteremic inpatients before/after AXDX implementation was conducted comparing clinical outcomes from 1 historical and 2 intervention cohorts (AXDX and AXDX+RTN). Primary outcome was LOS.

RESULTS

Of 830 bacteremic episodes, 188 (77%) of 245 historical and 308 (155 AXDX, 153 AXDX+RTN; 65%) of 585 intervention episodes were included. Median LOS was shorter with AXDX (6.3d) and AXDX+RTN (6.7d) compared to historical (8.1d; P=0.001). Achievement of optimal therapy (AOT) was more frequent (93.6% and 95.4%) and median time to optimal therapy (TTOT) was faster (1.3d and 1.4d) in AXDX and AXDX+RTN compared to historical (84.6%, P≤0.001 and 2.4d; P≤0.001) respectively. Median antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) was shorter in both intervention arms compared to historical (6d each vs 7d; P=0.011). Median LOS benefit was most pronounced in patients with coagulase negative Staphylococcus bacteremia (5.5d and 4.5d vs 7.2d; P=0.003) in AXDX, AXDX+RTN, and historical cohorts respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LOS, AOT, TTOT, and total DOT significantly improved after AXDX implementation. Addition of RTN did not show further improvement over AXDX and an already active ASP. These results suggest AXDX can be integrated into healthcare systems with an active ASP even without the resources to include RTN.

Using Genetic Distance from Archived Samples for the Prediction of Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli

The rising rates of antibiotic resistance increasingly compromise empirical treatment. Knowing the antibiotic susceptibility of a pathogen's close genetic relative(s) may improve empirical antibiotic selection. Using genomic and phenotypic data for Escherichia coli isolates from three separate clinically derived databases, we evaluated multiple genomic methods and statistical models for predicting antibiotic susceptibility, focusing on potentially rapidly available information, such as lineage or genetic distance from archived isolates. We applied these methods to derive and validate the prediction of antibiotic susceptibility to common antibiotics. We evaluated 968 separate episodes of suspected and confirmed infection with Escherichia coli from three geographically and temporally separated databases in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 to 2018. Across all approaches, model performance (area under the curve [AUC]) ranges for predicting antibiotic susceptibility were the greatest for ciprofloxacin (AUC, 0.76 to 0.97) and the lowest for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (AUC, 0.51 to 0.80). When a model predicted that an isolate was susceptible, the resulting (posttest) probabilities of susceptibility were sufficient to warrant empirical therapy for most antibiotics (mean, 92%). An approach combining multiple models could permit the use of narrower-spectrum oral agents in 2 out of every 3 patients while maintaining high treatment adequacy (∼90%). Methods based on genetic relatedness to archived samples of E. coli could be used to predict antibiotic resistance and improve antibiotic selection.

Antimicrobial stewardship in transplant patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on the current landscape of antimicrobial stewardship in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Constructing personalized antimicrobial prescribing approaches to avoid untoward consequences of antimicrobials while improving outcomes is an emerging and critical aspect of transplant medicine. Stewardship activities encompassing the specialized interests of transplant patients and programs are evolving. New literature evaluating strategies to optimize antimicrobial agent selection, dosing, and duration have been published. Additionally, consensus guidance for certain infectious clinical syndromes is available and should inform institutional clinical practice guidelines. Novel metrics for stewardship-related outcomes in transplantation are desperately needed. Though exciting new molecular diagnostic technologies will likely be pivotal in the care of immunocompromised patients, optimal clinical adaptation and appropriate integration remains unclear. Important studies understanding the behaviors influencing antimicrobial prescribing in organizational transplant cultures are needed to optimize interventions.

SUMMARY

Consequences of antimicrobial use, such as Clostridiodes difficile and infections with multidrug-resistant organisms disproportionately affect SOT recipients and are associated with poor allograft and patient outcomes. Application of ASP interventions tailored to SOT recipients is recommended though further studies are needed to provide guidance for best practice.

Variability in antifungal stewardship strategies among Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network facilities

OBJECTIVE

To characterize antifungal stewardship among antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) at a diverse range of hospitals and to correlate antifungal stewardship with hospital characteristics.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

PARTICIPANTS

ASP physician and/or pharmacist members at Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Research Network (SRN) hospitals.

METHODS

An electronic survey administered August-September 2018 via the SRN to 111 hospitals. The χ2 test was used to test associations between ASP and hospital characteristics and use of antifungal stewardship strategies.

RESULTS

Of 111 hospitals, 45 (41%) responded; most were academic medical centers (65%) caring for stem-cell patients (73.3%) and solid-organ transplant patients (80.0%). Most hospitals have large, well-established ASPs: 60% had >5 team members and 68.9% had a duration ≥6 years. In 43 hospitals (95.6%), ASPs used antifungal stewardship strategies, most commonly prospective audit and feedback (73.3%) by a pharmacist (71.4%). Half of ASPs (51.1%) created guidelines for invasive fungal infection (IFI) management. Most hospitals (71.1%) offered rapid laboratory tests to diagnose IFI, but polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and antifungal susceptibility testing varied. Also, 29 ASPs (64.4%) perform surveillance of antifungal utilization, but only 9 (31%) reported to the CDC National Healthcare Safety Network. ASP size, duration, and presence of transplant populations were not associated with a higher likelihood of using antifungal stewardship strategies (P > .05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antifungal stewardship strategies was high at SRN hospitals, but they mainly involved audit and feedback. ASPs should be encouraged (1) to disseminate guidelines for IFI management, (2) to promote access to laboratory tests for rapid and accurate IFI diagnosis, and (3) to perform surveillance for antifungal utilization with reporting to the CDC.

Enhanced antimicrobial stewardship based on rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing for bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancies: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Recently, rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) based on microscopic imaging analysis has been developed. The aim of this study was to determine whether implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASP) based on rapid phenotypic AST can increase the proportion of patients with haematological malignancies who receive optimal targeted antibiotics during early periods of bacteraemia.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with haematological malignancies and at least one positive blood culture. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to conventional (n = 60) or rapid phenotypic (n = 56) AST. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving optimal targeted antibiotics 72 hr after blood collection for culture.

RESULTS

The percentage receiving optimal targeted antibiotics at 72 hr was significantly higher in the rapid phenotypic AST group (45/56, 80.4%) than in conventional AST group (34/60, 56.7%) (relative risk (RR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.83). The percentage receiving unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics at 72 hr was significantly lower (7/26, 12.5% vs 18/60, 30.0%; RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.92) and the mean time to optimal targeted antibiotic treatment was significantly shorter (38.1, standard deviation (SD) 38.2 vs 72.8, SD 93.0 hr; p < 0.001) in the rapid phenotypic AST group. The mean time from blood collection to the AST result was significantly shorter in the rapid phenotypic AST group (48.3, SD 17.6 vs 83.1, SD 22.2 hr).

DISCUSSION

ASP based on rapid phenotypic AST can rapidly optimize antibiotic treatment for bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancy. Rapid phenotypic AST can improve antimicrobial stewardship in immunocompromised patients.

ERS International Congress, Madrid, 2019: highlights from the Respiratory Infections Assembly

The European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress organised in Madrid, Spain, in 2019 welcomed >22 000 participants from 134 countries. For each ERS assembly, an impressive number of abstracts were submitted. The topics covered by Assembly 10 (Respiratory Infections and Tuberculosis) were included this year in the top five research areas with the most submitted abstracts, with a total of 424 abstracts accepted for presentation. As it would be difficult for any delegate to stay up to date with all the scientific advances in the field, we wanted to highlight three of the Congress sessions that included presentations on respiratory infections and tuberculosis that we deemed as important and we hope the readers will consider this material of great interest.

Use of Rapid Diagnostics To Manage Pediatric Bloodstream Infections? You Bet Your ASP!

Rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) can facilitate earlier optimization of the treatment of bloodstream infections, particularly in conjunction with an effective antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). However, the effective implementation and workflow of RDTs are still a matter of debate, particularly in a pediatric setting. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, L. J. Juttukonda, S. Katz, J. Gillon, J. Schmitz, and R. Banerjee (J Clin Microbiol 58:e01400-19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01400-19) investigate the impact of a multiplex, molecular RDT on changes to antimicrobial therapy in an academic children's hospital. These data reveal several factors that clinical laboratories should consider prior to the implementation of RDTs for positive blood cultures.

Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Test in a Children's Hospital Depends on Gram-Positive versus Gram-Negative Organism and Day versus Night Shift

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) decrease the time to organism identification and resistance detection. RDTs are associated with early deescalation of therapy for Gram-positive BSIs. However, it is less clear how RDTs influence antibiotic management for Gram-negative BSIs and whether RDT results are acted on during off-hours. We performed a single-center, retrospective review of children with BSI and Verigene (VG) testing at a children's hospital. Of the 301 positive cultures included in the study (196 Gram-positive, 44 Gram-negative, 32 polymicrobial, and 29 non-VG targets), the VG result had potential to impact antibiotic selection in 171 cases; among these, antibiotic changes occurred in 119 (70%) cases. For Gram-negative cultures, the Verigene result correlated with unnecessary antibiotic escalation and exposure to broader-spectrum antibiotics than needed. In contrast, for Gram-positive cultures, the VG results correlated with appropriate antibiotic selection. VG results permitted early deescalation for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (19/24 [79%]) and avoidance of antibiotics for skin contaminants (30/85 [35%]). Antibiotic changes occurred more quickly during the day than at night (4.6 versus 11.7 h, respectively; P < 0.05), and antibiotic escalations occurred more quickly than did deescalations (4.1 versus 10.1 h, P < 0.01). In a pediatric institution with a low prevalence of Gram-negative resistance, the VG RDT facilitated antibiotic optimization for Gram-positive BSIs but led to unnecessary escalation of antibiotics for Gram-negative BSIs. The time to action was slower for RDT results reported at night than during the day. Laboratories should consider these factors when implementing blood culture RDTs.

Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel

Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. The GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a multiplex nucleic acid amplification assay based on competitive DNA hybridization and electrochemical detection using eSensor technology. This multicenter study compared the investigational-use-only (IUO) BCID-GP Panel to other methods of identification of 20 Gram-positive bacteria, four antimicrobial resistance genes, and both Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets that are unique to the BCID-GP Panel.

Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. The GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a multiplex nucleic acid amplification assay based on competitive DNA hybridization and electrochemical detection using eSensor technology. This multicenter study compared the investigational-use-only (IUO) BCID-GP Panel to other methods of identification of 20 Gram-positive bacteria, four antimicrobial resistance genes, and both Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets that are unique to the BCID-GP Panel. Ten microbiology laboratories throughout the United States collected residual, deidentified positive blood culture samples for analysis. Five laboratories tested both clinical and contrived samples with the BCID-GP Panel. Comparator identification methods included each laboratory’s SOC, which included matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and automated identification systems as well as targeted PCR/analytically validated real-time PCR (qPCR) with bidirectional sequencing. A total of 2,342 evaluable samples (1,777 clinical and 565 contrived) were tested with the BCID-GP Panel. The overall sample accuracy for on-panel organisms was 89% before resolution of discordant results. For pathogenic Gram-positive targets (Bacillus cereus group, Enterococcus spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Listeria spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes), positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) ranged from 93.1% to 100% and 98.8% to 100%, respectively. For contamination rule-out targets (Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium acnes, Lactobacillus, and Micrococcus), PPA and NPA ranged from 84.5% to 100% and 99.9% to 100%, respectively. Positive percent agreement and NPA for the Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets were 92.4% and 95.7% for the former and 99.9% and 99.6% for the latter. The PPAs for resistance markers were as follows: mecA, 97.2%; mecC, 100%; vanA, 96.8%; and vanB, 100%. Negative percent agreement ranged from 96.6% to 100%. In conclusion, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel compares favorably to SOC and targeted molecular methods for the identification of 20 Gram-positive pathogens and four antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. This panel detects a broad range of pathogens and mixed infections with yeast and Gram-negative organisms from the same positive blood culture bottle.

Impact of rapid microbial identification on clinical outcomes in bloodstream infection: the RAPIDO randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

Bloodstream infection has a high mortality rate. It is not clear whether laboratory-based rapid identification of the organisms involved would improve outcome.

METHODS

The RAPIDO trial was an open parallel-group multicentre randomized controlled trial. We tested all positive blood cultures from hospitalized adults by conventional methods of microbial identification and those from patients randomized (1:1) to rapid diagnosis in addition to matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) performed directly on positive blood cultures. The only primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Clinical advice on patient management was provided to members of both groups by infection specialists.

RESULTS

First positive blood culture samples from 8628 patients were randomized, 4312 into rapid diagnosis and 4136 into conventional diagnosis. After prespecified postrandomization exclusions, 2740 in the rapid diagnosis arm and 2810 in the conventional arm were included in the mortality analysis. There was no significant difference in 28-day survival (81.5% 2233/2740 rapid vs. 82.3% 2313/2810 conventional; hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.19, p 0.42). Microbial identification was quicker in the rapid diagnosis group (median (interquartile range) 38.5 (26.7-50.3) hours after blood sampling vs. 50.3 (47.1-72.9) hours after blood sampling, p < 0.01), but times to effective antimicrobial therapy were no shorter (respectively median (interquartile range) 24 (2-78) hours vs. 13 (2-69) hours). There were no significant differences in 7-day mortality or total antibiotic consumption; times to resolution of fever, discharge from hospital or de-escalation of broad-spectrum therapy or 28-day Clostridioides difficile incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens by MALDI-TOF MS in this trial did not reduce patient mortality despite delivering laboratory data to clinicians sooner.

Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is defined by positive blood cultures in a patient with systemic signs of infection and may be either secondary to a documented source or primary—that is, without identified origin. Community-acquired BSIs in immunocompetent adults usually involve drug-susceptible bacteria, while healthcare-associated BSIs are frequently due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. Early adequate antimicrobial therapy is a key to improve patient outcomes, especially in those with criteria for sepsis or septic shock, and should be based on guidelines and direct examination of available samples. Local epidemiology, suspected source, immune status, previous antimicrobial exposure, and documented colonization with MDR bacteria must be considered for the choice of first-line antimicrobials in healthcare-associated and hospital-acquired BSIs. Early genotypic or phenotypic tests are now available for bacterial identification and early detection of resistance mechanisms and may help, though their clinical impact warrants further investigations. Initial antimicrobial dosing should take into account the pharmacokinetic alterations commonly observed in ICU patients, with a loading dose in case of sepsis or septic shock. Initial antimicrobial combination attempting to increase the antimicrobial spectrum should be discussed when MDR bacteria are suspected and/or in the most severely ill patients. Source identification and control should be performed as soon as the hemodynamic status is stabilized. De-escalation from a broad-spectrum to a narrow-spectrum antimicrobial may reduce antibiotic selection pressure without negative impact on mortality. The duration of therapy is usually 5–8 days though longer durations may be discussed depending on the underlying illness and the source of infection. This narrative review covers the epidemiology, diagnostic workflow and therapeutic aspects of BSI in ICU patients and proposed up-to-date expert statements.

Clinical microbiology

The clinical microbiology laboratory relies on traditional diagnostic methods such as culturing, Gram stains, and biochemical testing. Receipt of a high-quality specimen with an appropriate test order is integral to accurate testing. Recent technological advancements have led to decreased time to results and improved diagnostic accuracy. Examples of advancements discussed in this chapter include automation of bacterial culture processing and incubation, as well as introduction of mass spectrometry for the proteomic identification of microorganisms. In addition, molecular testing is increasingly common in the clinical laboratory. Commercially available multiplex molecular assays simultaneously test for a broad array of syndromic-related pathogens, providing rapid and sensitive diagnostic results. Molecular advancements have also transformed point-of-care (POC) microbiology testing, and molecular POC assays may largely supplant traditional rapid antigen testing in the future. Integration of new technologies with traditional testing methods has led to improved quality and value in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

After reviewing this chapter, the reader will be able to:•

List key considerations for specimen collection for microbiology testing.

•

Discuss the advantages and limitations of automation in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

•

Describe the evolution of microorganism identification methods.

•

Discuss the benefits and limitations of molecular microbiology point-of-care testing.

•

Summarize currently available multiplex molecular microbiology testing options.

Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem

In this review, we present a comprehensive discussion of matters related to the problem of blood culture contamination. Issues addressed include the scope and magnitude of the problem, the bacteria most often recognized as contaminants, the impact of blood culture contamination on clinical microbiology laboratory function, the economic and clinical ramifications of contamination, and, perhaps most importantly, a systematic discussion of solutions to the problem. We conclude by providing a series of unanswered questions that pertain to this important issue.

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective observational study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the clinical impact of isothermal loop-mediated amplification (LAMP; eazyplex® MRSA kits) for rapid diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) in comparison with conventional blood culture diagnostics. We performed a retrospective, single-center observational study over the period between November 2016 and December 2018 on patients (and blood cultures) with growth of Gram-positive cocci in clusters in their blood cultures. We quantified diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity and specificity for detection of S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and the mecA/C resistance genes in 797 blood cultures. The clinical impact was assessed by time to result reporting, time to appropriate treatment, and length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) in 190 SAB patients. We observed sensitivity and specificity above 90% for S. aureus detection (sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)), 99.57% (97.61%, 99.98%); specificity, 99.12% (97.95%, 99.71%)), for MRSA detection (sensitivity, 100% (89.11%, 100.00%); specificity, 99.72% (99.05, 99.96)), and for mecA/C detection (sensitivity, 94.71% (91.85%, 96.78%); specificity, 95.89% (93.58%, 97.54%)). LAMP testing was associated with shorter median time to result reporting (24.0 h (first and third quartiles (Q1-Q3), 20.0-27.0 h) vs 41.5 h (36.0-46.0 h); p < 0.001) and different distribution of time to appropriate treatment (2.0 days (1.0-3.0) vs 2.0 days (2.0-3.0); p = 0.004). No evidence for differences in length-of-stay in ICU was observed. Our analysis suggests for the application of LAMP (i) a high diagnostic accuracy for detection of S. aureus and the mecA/C genes in blood cultures, (ii) an earlier result reporting, and (iii) a shorter time to appropriate treatment.

Collaborative Antimicrobial Stewardship: Working with Microbiology

There have been tremendous advances in methodologies available for detection and identification of organisms causing infections. Providers can now obtain identification results and antimicrobial susceptibility results in a shorter period of time. However, declining health care resources highlight the importance of selecting the right test at the right time to maximize diagnostic benefits. Therefore, the role of the antimicrobial stewardship team in the clinical microbiology laboratory has expanded to include diagnostic stewardship and provision of guidance on test selection for diagnosis and management of infection. This review focuses on the experience of our group in collaborative stewardship, emphasizing successes and challenges.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Bundle for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia

BACKGROUND

Recent studies in gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) suggest that intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) switch and short treatment durations yield similar clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events. Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) bundled initiatives have been associated with improved clinical outcomes for bloodstream infections.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort evaluation included inpatient adults from 11/2014-10/2015 and 10/2017-9/2018 with GNB. The pre-ASP period was before the establishment of an ASP program. In the post period, the ASP promoted IV-to-PO switches, avoidance of repeat blood cultures, and short treatment durations for patients with uncomplicated GNB. The primary outcome was duration of antibiotic therapy. Secondary outcomes included process measures associated with the bundle and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-seven patients met criteria for inclusion, with 51 patients in the pre group and 86 patients in the post group. Background characteristics were similar between groups. The median duration of therapy (interquartile range) was 14 (10-16) days in the pre group and 10 days (7-14) in the post group (P < .001). The median day of IV-to-PO switch was day 5 (4-6) in the pre group vs day 4 (3-5) in the post group (P = .046). The average total hospital cost per case decreased by 27% in the post group (P = .19). Mortality rates and bacteremia recurrence were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An ASP bundle for uncomplicated GNB was associated with reduced durations of therapy and earlier PO switch. These findings highlight the synergistic role of ASPs in optimizing antibiotic use and promoting patient safety.

Evaluation of a new Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility system for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bloodstream infections: speed and accuracy of Alfred 60AST

BACKGROUND

Blood stream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The time from taking blood cultures to obtain results of antibiotic sensitivity can be up to five days which impacts patient care. The Alfred 60 AST™ can reduce laboratory time from positive culture bottle to susceptibility results from 16 to 25 h to 5-6 h, transforming patient care. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility system, the Alfred 60 AST™, in clinical isolates from patients with BSIs and confirm time to results. 301 Gram-negative and 86 Gram-positive isolates were analysed directly from positive blood culture bottles following Gram staining. Antimicrobial susceptibility results and time-to-results obtained by rapid Alfred 60 AST system and BD Phoenix were compared .

RESULTS

A total of 2196 antimicrobial susceptibility test results (AST) were performed: 1863 Gram-negative and 333 Gram-positive. AST categorical agreement (CA) for Alfred 60 AST™ was 95% (1772/1863) for Gram-negative and 89% (295/333) for Gram-positive isolates. Gram-negative CA: ampicillin 96% (290/301); ciprofloxacin 95% (283/297); ceftriaxone 96% (75/78); meropenem 97% (288/297); piperacillin-tazobactam 95% (280/295); gentamicin 94% (279/297) and amikacin 93% (277/298). The median time to susceptibility results from blood culture flagging positive was 6.3 h vs 20 h (p < 0.01) for Alfred system vs BD Phoenix™.

CONCLUSION

Alfred 60 AST system greatly reduced time to antimicrobial susceptibility results in Gram-negative and Gram-positive BSIs with good performance and cost, particularly for Gram-negative bacteraemia.

The Impact of Integrating Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel to an Established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the United Arab of Emirates

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown improvement in the outcome of blood stream infections (BSI) due to the use of Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel (BCID) in Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). There is currently no data on the use of BCID with ASP in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

METHOD

Pre-post quasiexperimental study included hospitalized patients with BSI, their positive blood cultures on BCID were studied in 2 groups: conventional culture with ASP (AS), and BCID with ASP (BCID). The primary outcomes were time to first appropriate antimicrobial therapy, infection related length of stay (LOS), ICU admission, 14 days bacteremia recurrence and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30 days reinfection rate, hospital cost and ASP interventions.

RESULTS

Out of total 477 positive blood cultures, 206 (AS and BCID) with real BSI were included. The time needed for organism identification was shorter in the BCID group than in the AS group (1.3 h vs. 51 h; P = 0.0002). BCID had a shorter time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy than AS (17.8 h vs.45 h; P = 0.0004). No statistical difference was observed in mortality rate, 14 days bacteremia recurrence, ICU admission, hospital cost, LOS or ASP interventions.

CONCLUSION

Implementing BCID to ASP significantly decreased the time needed to identify the organism and time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Similarly, LOS and hospital cost were reduced, however, the reduction was not statistically significant.

Antimicrobial de-escalation in critically ill patients: a position statement from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Critically Ill Patients Study Group (ESGCIP)

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial de-escalation (ADE) is a strategy of antimicrobial stewardship, aiming at preventing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) by decreasing the exposure to broad-spectrum antimicrobials. There is no high-quality research on ADE and its effects on AMR. Its definition varies and there is little evidence-based guidance for clinicians to use ADE in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A task force of 16 international experts was formed in November 2016 to provide with guidelines for clinical practice to develop questions targeted at defining ADE, its effects on the ICU population and to provide clinical guidance. Groups of 2 experts were assigned 1-2 questions each within their field of expertise to provide draft statements and rationale. A Delphi method, with 3 rounds and an agreement threshold of 70% was required to reach consensus.

RESULTS

We present a comprehensive document with 13 statements, reviewing the evidence on the definition of ADE, its effects in the ICU population and providing guidance for clinicians in subsets of clinical scenarios where ADE may be considered.

CONCLUSION

ADE remains a topic of controversy due to the complexity of clinical scenarios where it may be applied and the absence of evidence to the effects it may have on antimicrobial resistance.

Rapid microbial identification and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures: a new platform compared to routine laboratory methods

The Accelerate Pheno™ System (APS), a new platform that combines rapid identification (ID) of bacteria and yeasts and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in a single assay, has been evaluated directly from positive blood cultures in comparison to routine laboratory methods. The APS ID results showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 92.6% and 99.6%, respectively. With regard to AST results, 31 discrepancies (8 single errors and 23 combined errors) were observed, including 13 major errors (3.3%) and 18 minor errors (4.6%) mainly involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa. No very major error was observed. The APS ID results were obtained in 1.5 h and the AST results were available in 7 h, on average 34.1 h before routine laboratory methods. This reduction in AST time-to-result represents one of the main advantages of this technology, reducing the time to provide to the physician the microbiological report.

Molecular Diagnostic Advances in Transplant Infectious Diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The infectious complications of transplantation can have devastating consequences for patients. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential to good outcomes. This review describes recent advances in pathogen-directed diagnostic testing and discusses the role of new methods for transplant infectious diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several molecular assays have been introduced into clinical practice in recent years. When the results of rapid testing are linked to patient-specific interventions, improved outcomes can be realized. Syndromic testing along with metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) represents novel approaches to infection diagnosis. However, the optimal use of these tests for transplant patients along with an overall assessment of cost-effectiveness demands further study. Molecular diagnostics are revolutionizing transplant care. Clinicians need to be aware of the current diagnostic landscape and have a working knowledge of the nuances related to test performance, result interpretation, and cost.

Rapid molecular tests for detection of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Gram-negative organisms from positive blood cultures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Timely detection of antimicrobial (cephalosporin/carbapenem) resistance (AMR) determinants is crucial to the clinical management of bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB).

OBJECTIVES

To review and meta-analyse the evidence for using commercially available molecular tests for the direct detection of AMR determinants in GNB-positive blood cultures (PBCs).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus and ISI Web of Knowledge.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Clinical studies evaluating the performance of two major commercial systems, namely the Verigene® and FilmArray® systems, for rapid testing of GNB-PBCs, in comparison with the phenotypic or genotypic methods performed on GNB-PBC isolates.

METHODS

Literature search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria and, for meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity of both systems, bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were identified (3310 isolates) from 2006 to 2019. Nine studies were conducted in East Asia. In 15 studies using phenotypic comparators (1930 isolates), 1014 (52.5%) isolates were Escherichia coli, and 287 (14.9%) of all the isolates displayed AMR phenotypes. In five studies using genotypic comparators (1380 isolates), 585 (42.4%) were E. coli, and 100 (7.2%) of all the isolates displayed AMR genotypes. Pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for detection of AMR determinants by the Verigene (i.e. CTX-M, IMP, KPC, NDM, OXA and VIM) and/or FilmArray (i.e. KPC) systems were 85.3% (95% CI 79.9%-89.4%) and 99.1% (95% CI 98.2%-99.5%), respectively, across the 15 studies, and 95.5% (95% CI 89.2%-98.2%) and 99.7% (95% CI 99.1%-99.9%), respectively, across the five studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the Verigene and FilmArray systems may be a valid adjunct to the conventional microbiology (phenotypic or genotypic) methods used to identify AMR in GNBs. The FilmArray system detects only one AMR genotype, namely KPC, limiting its use. Both Verigene and FilmArray systems can miss important cephalosporin/carbapenem resistance phenotypes in a minority of cases. However, the sensitivity and specificity of both systems render them valuable clinical tools in timely identification of resistant isolates. Further studies will establish the prominence of such rapid diagnostics as standard of care in individuals with bloodstream infections.

Development of a Multiplex PCR Platform for the Rapid Detection of Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance, and Candida in Human Blood Samples

The diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSIs) still relies on blood culture (BC), but low turnaround times may hinder the early initiation of an appropriate antimicrobial therapy, thus increasing the risk of infection-related death. We describe a direct and rapid multiplex PCR-based assay capable of detecting and identifying 16 bacterial and four Candida species, as well as three antibiotic-resistance determinants, in uncultured samples. Using whole-blood samples spiked with microorganisms at low densities, we found that the MicrobScan assay had a mean limit of detection of 15.1 ± 3.3 CFU of bacteria/Candida per ml of blood. When applied to positive BC samples, the assay allowed the sensitive and specific detection of BSI pathogens, including bla _KPC-, mecA-, or vanA/vanB-positive bacteria. We evaluated the assay using prospectively collected blood samples from patients with suspected BSI. The sensitivity and specificity were 86.4 and 97.0%, respectively, among patients with positive BCs for the microorganisms targeted by the assay or patients fulfilling the criteria for infection. The mean times to positive or negative assay results were 5.3 ± 0.2 and 5.1 ± 0.1 h, respectively. Fifteen of 20 patients with MicrobScan assay-positive/BC-negative samples were receiving antimicrobial therapy. In conclusion, the MicrobScan assay is well suited to complement current diagnostic methods for BSIs.

Evaluation of the impact of the Accelerate Pheno™ system on time to result for differing antimicrobial stewardship intervention models in patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections

Background

Initiating early effective antimicrobial therapy is the most important intervention demonstrated to decrease mortality in patients with gram-negative bacteremia with sepsis. Rapid MIC-based susceptibility results make it possible to optimize antimicrobial use through both escalation and de-escalation.

Method

We prospectively evaluated the performance of the Accelerate Pheno™ system (AXDX) for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative species and compared the time to result between AXDX and routine standard of care (SOC) using 82 patient samples and 18 challenge organisms with various confirmed resistance mechanisms. The potential impact of AXDX on time to antimicrobial optimization was investigated with various simulated antimicrobial stewardship (ASTEW) intervention models.

Results

The overall positive and negative percent agreement of AXDX for identification were 100 and 99.9%, respectively. Compared to VITEK® 2, the overall essential agreement was 96.1% and categorical agreement was 95.4%. No very major or major errors were detected. AXDX reduced the time to identification by an average of 11.8 h and time to susceptibility by an average of 36.7 h. In 27 patients evaluated for potential clinical impact of AXDX on antimicrobial optimization, 18 (67%) patients could potentially have had therapy optimized sooner with an average of 18.1 h reduction in time to optimal therapy.

Conclusion

Utilization of AXDX coupled with simulated ASTEW intervention notification substantially shortened the time to potential antimicrobial optimization in this cohort of patients with gram-negative bacteremia. This improvement in time occurred when ASTEW support was limited to an 8-h coverage model.

A Baker's Dozen of Top Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Publications in 2018

With an increasing number of antimicrobial stewardship-related articles published each year, attempting to stay current is challenging. The Southeastern Research Group Endeavor (SERGE-45) identified antimicrobial stewardship-related peer-reviewed literature that detailed an actionable intervention for 2018. The top 13 publications were selected using a modified Delphi technique. These manuscripts were reviewed to highlight the actionable intervention used by antimicrobial stewardship programs to provide key stewardship literature for teaching and training as well as to identify potential intervention opportunities within one's institution.

Acinetobacter Pneumonia: Improving Outcomes With Early Identification and Appropriate Therapy

In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, Acinetobacter distinguishes itself as one of the most resistant Gram-negative bacteria responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. New solutions are needed to combat the detrimental effects of increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance. Using empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients deemed at risk for infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens may protect against attributable mortality, but this temporary solution furthers the risk of antimicrobial resistance. In this article we will review relevant strategies to aid with early identification and appropriate treatment of Acinetobacter pneumonia while preserving antibiotic susceptibility.

Biomarkers of Infection and Sepsis

The role of biomarkers for detection of sepsis has come a long way. Molecular biomarkers are taking front stage at present, but machine learning and other computational measures using bigdata sets are promising. Clinical research in sepsis is hampered by lack of specificity of the diagnosis; sepsis is a syndrome with no uniformly agreed definition. This lack of diagnostic precision means there is no gold standard for this diagnosis. The final conclusion is expert opinion, which is not bad but not perfect. Perhaps machine learning will displace expert opinion as the final and most accurate definition for sepsis.