Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment

New surgical treatment using a docking nail for postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip arthroplasty

We report 2 cases of patients (75 and 81 years old) who had a femoral shaft fracture around the femoral prosthesis after total hip arthroplasty. Using information on the implanted stem and the preoperative radiographs, we cut and trimmed an ordinary supracondylar type intramedullary nail, after which we have termed a "docking nail." We then performed osteosynthesis using the docking nail, which is connected to the tip of the implanted stem to ensure proper alignment. Within 3 months, bony union with good alignment was observed in both patients without malunion or infection. Clinical and radiographic examination during the follow-up period showed good results. The advantages of this method are that it is less invasive and simpler compared with the conventional methods.

Results of uncemented distal locked prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty with proximal femoral bone loss: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Management of bone loss is a challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). A retrospective review was performed to study the use of uncemented distal locked prosthesis in cases with proximal femoral bone loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Uncemented stems with distal interlocking were used in 65 hips during revision THAs with 38 hips having Paprosky IIIB/IV defects between January 1998 and February 2004. There were 48 males and 17 females in the study with an average age of 53 years (range 30-80 years). Radiographic and clinical outcome evaluation using the Harris hip score (HHS) were performed.

RESULTS

AN IMPROVEMENT IN HHS (MEAN: 33 points) was observed at final followup (mean: 9 years). Regeneration of proximal bone stock was observed without signs of loosening or subsidence and none of the stems were revised. Three patients developed recurrent dislocation while one had a stem subsidence of 1cm following removal of interlocking bolts.

CONCLUSION

Uncemented distal locked prosthesis provide adequate stability in revision THA, aiding the reconstruction of bony deficiencies while avoiding the disadvantages of fully porous or cemented implants.

Revision hip arthroplasty as a treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures without bone grafting

BACKGROUND

It is conventionally considered that bone grafting is mandatory for Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) although few clinical studies have challenged the concept previously. The aim of the current study was to investigate the radiographic and functional results of Vancouver B3 PFF treated by revision total hip or hemiarthroplasty (HA) in combination with appropriate internal fixation without bone grafting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

12 patients with Vancouver B3 PFF were treated by revision THA/HA without bone grafting between March 2004 and May 2008. There were nine females and three males, with an average age of 76 years. PFFs were following primary THA/HA in nine patients and following revision THA/HA in three. Postoperative followup was 5.5 years on average (range, 3.5-6.5 years). At the final followup, radiographic results were evaluated with Beals and Tower's criteria and functional outcomes were evaluated using the Merle d'Aubigné scoring system.

RESULTS

All fractures healed within an average of 20 weeks (range, 12-28 weeks). There was no significant deformity and shortening of the affected limb and the implant was stable. The average Merle d'Aubigné score was 15.8. Walking ability was regained in 10 patients without additional assistance, while 2 patients had to use crutches. There were 2 patients with numbness of lateral thigh, possibly due to injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. There were no implant failures, dislocation and refractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision THA/HA in combination with appropriate internal fixation without bone grafting is a good option for treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures in the elderly.

Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures treated with the uncemented Wagner revision stem

The clinical and radiological results of Vancouver type B2 and B3 peri-prosthetic fractures treated with an uncemented Wagner revision stem (3rd generation) were analysed. Two groups were identified, 15 patients had a B2 and 14 cases a B3 periprosthetic fracture. The mean follow-up was 74 months after the index operation. All fractures had united radiographically. No cases of non-union were found. There was only one case of aseptic loosening. The clinical scores presented encouraging results for both groups. The uncemented distal fixation stem was an effective solution in the treatment of type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures at mid-term follow up.

Periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 and C fractures treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis: fracture union and reoperations in 60 consecutive fractures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Historically, the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) has been associated with a high frequency of complications and reoperations. The preferred treatment is internal fixation, a revision of the femoral stem, or a combination of both. An improved understanding of plate use during internal fixation, and the introduction of locking-plate osteosynthesis may lead to improved outcome. We evaluated the outcome of Vancouver type B1 and C PFFs treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis, by assessing rates of fracture union and reoperations and by analyzing failure cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2002 through 2011, 58 consecutive patients (60 fractures) with low-energy PFF around or below a stable femoral stem, i.e. Vancouver type B1 and C fractures, underwent osteosynthesis with a locking plate. All patients had a total hip replacement (THR). They were followed up clinically and radiographically, with 6 weeks between visits, until fracture union or until death. Fracture union was evaluated 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 23 (0-121) months after PFF, 8 patients (8 fractures) had been reoperated due either to infection (n = 4), failure of fixation (n = 3), or loosening of the femoral stem (n = 1). All the patients who had been followed up for at least 6 months-and who did not undergo reoperation or die-went on to fracture union (n = 43).

INTERPRETATION

Locking-plate osteosynthesis of periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 and C fractures gives good results regarding fracture union. It appears that spanning of the prosthesis to avoid stress-rising areas is important for successful treatment. Infection is the major cause of failure.

A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone

Several techniques are described for fixation of Vancouver B1 femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty. Twenty-four femurs were scanned by dual x-ray absorptiometry scanned and matched for bone mineral density. Femurs were implanted with a cemented simulated total hip prosthesis with a simulated periprosthetic femur fracture distal to the stem. Fractures were fixed with Synthes (Paoli, Pa) 12-hole curved plates and 4 different constructs proximally. Each construct was loaded to failure in axial compression. Constructs with locking and nonlocking screws demonstrated equivalent loads at failure and were superior in load at failure compared with cables. Cable constructs failed proximally. No proximal failures occurred in specimens fixed with screws and cables. A combination of locked or nonlocked screws and supplemental cable fixation is recommended for the treatment of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures.

[Patients with periprosthetic femur fractures and consecutive stem replacement. Analysis of survival, complications, and quality of life]

BACKGROUND

The goal of treating proximal periprosthetic femur fractures in geriatric patients is a timely postoperative mobilization. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results after treating our patients by femoral stem exchange irrespective of fixation status. The study included 32 patients (2001-2009; mean age 82 years; Vancouver classification: 12 type B1, 16 type B2, and 4 type C).

METHOD

Ambulatory status and activities of daily living pre- and postoperatively were compared. Retrospective data collection was performed by reviewing patients' charts. By interviewing patients, family members, and family physicians missing information was collected.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients (69%) achieved their pre-traumatic mobilization level; 22 of 26 patients (85%) were reintegrated into their pre-traumatic environment. A 16% (n=5) complication rate and an 87% 12-month survival rate were calculated.

CONCLUSION

The concept of primary stable periprosthetic fracture care by using a revision prosthetic device potentially reduces complications related to postoperative non-weight-bearing without increasing the complication rate related to a more complex surgical procedure.

Hammering sound frequency analysis and prevention of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty

Adequate fixation at the time of cementless stem implantation depends on the operator's experience. An objective evaluation method to determine whether the stem has been appropriately implanted may be helpful. We studied the relationship between the hammering sound frequency during stem implantation and internal stress in a femoral model, and evaluated the possible usefulness of hammering sound frequency analysis for preventing intraoperative fracture. Three types of cementless stem (BiCONTACT®, SL-PLUS®, and AI-Hip®) were used. Surgeons performed stem insertion using a procedure similar to that employed in a routine operation. Stress was estimated by finite element analysis, the hammering force was measured, and frequency analysis of hammering sound data obtained using a microphone. Finite element analysis showed a decrease in the hammering sound frequency with an increase in the estimated maximum stress. When a decrease in frequency was observed, adequate hammering had occurred, and the continuation of hammering risked fracture. Based on the relationship between stress and frequency, the evaluation of changes in frequency may be useful for preventing the development of intraoperative fractures. Using our method, when a decrease in frequency is observed, the hammering force should be reduced. Hammering sound frequency analysis may allow the prediction of bone fractures that can be visually confirmed, and may be a useful objective evaluation method for the prevention of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during stem insertion.

Current controversies in hip surgery

An international faculty of orthopaedic surgeons presented their work on the current challenges in hip surgery at the London Hip Meeting which was attended by over 400 delegates. The topics covered included femoroacetabular impingement, thromboembolic phenomena associated with hip surgery, bearing surfaces (including metal-on-metal articulations), outcomes of hip replacement surgery and revision hip replacement. We present a concise report of the current opinions on hip surgery from this meeting with appropriate references to the current literature.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures treated by locked plating: feasibility assessment of the mini-invasive surgical option. A prospective series of 36 fractures

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by conventional plating is associated with problems related to fracture union and eventual refracture. Additionally, locking nailing cannot be used in all cases because of the risk of malunion. To resolve these issues, locking plates have been proposed to combine the advantages of closed reduction and internal fixation while achieving a higher quality reduction with plate fixation.

HYPOTHESIS

Locking plates put into place by a mini-invasive surgical approach result in fixation without substantial misalignment or non-union.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 2002 to December 2007 we prospectively treated 35 patients (one bilateral), 28 women and seven men with a fracture around the hip implant (21), around the knee (8), between the hip implant and the knee (2), between a trochanteric internal fixation device and the knee implant (5). The mean age was 76, (39-93). Internal fixation was always attempted by mini-invasive surgery using locking plate system with locking screws (Synthès™). Rehabilitation included immediate weight bearing with as much weight as the patient would tolerate. The preoperative Parker score was 5.25 (0-9).

RESULTS

There was one patient lost to follow-up, one early failure, and seven deaths (four of whom were included in the study group since their follow-up was at least 24 months) for a total of 31 fractures (30 patients), the mean follow-up for the series was 26 months (6-67). Twenty-six fixations were performed by mini-invasive approach and 10 through a conventional open surgery. Patients applied full weight (n=20), partial weight (n=3) or no weight for 6 weeks (n=13). Infections developed in two patients and there were three cases of mechanical failure. Fracture union was achieved in 35 out of 36 cases. More than 5° of misalignment was observed in five patients. Loosening of the implant did not occur in any patients during follow-up. The Parker score in patients seen at follow up was 4.3 (0-9).

DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION

Locking compression plates associated with a mini-invasive surgical approach result in a high rate of union (35/36) with no significant misalignment (only 5/36 cases of misalignment of more than 5°), no refractures (n=0) and a low rate of mechanical failure (3/36) while allowing full weight bearing in most cases (20/36). Locking plates for periprosthetic femoral fractures allow patients to begin walking again, with stable intermediate term results.

[Intramedullary nailing of periprosthetic femoral fractures after revision for total knee endoprosthesis. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by inserted knee endoprostheis with intramedullary shaft by in situ lengthening of the prosthesis with specially prepared slotted hollow nails]

BACKGROUND

With the increasing number of revision operations after knee replacement a growing incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures which are difficult to treat is observed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study describes the operating procedure for osteosynthetic treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures using a specially made slotted hollow nail which is engrafted with the purpose of in-situ lengthening of the prosthesis and thus becomes stably clamped. From 1999 to 2008 our patients have included 9 who were treated by this method. There were 5 male and 4 female patients with an average age of 63.4 years (range 47–80 years). Prerequisites for the performance of this operation are stability of the prosthesis and knowledge of the type of prosthesis or exact preoperative planning based on CT measurement of the thickness and length relationships.

RESULTS

It was possible to conduct a clinical and radiological follow-up examination of all 9 patients after an average time of 29.1 months (range 10–64 months). In all cases load-bearing stabilization of the fracture was confirmed.

CONCLUSION

In-situ coupling of an endoprosthesis with a slotted hollow nail represents a valuable treatment option for periprosthetic fractures.

Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The rate of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty is rising and the estimated current lifetime incidence is 0.4-2.1%. While most authors recommend revision arthroplasty in patients with loose femoral shaft components, treatment options for patients with stable stem are not fully elucidated.

METHOD

Against this background we performed a retrospective chart analysis with clinical follow-up examination of 32 cases that sustained a Vancouver type B1 or C periprosthetic fracture (stable stem).

PATIENTS

Overall 16 cases were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) by plate osteosynthesis and 16 cases by revision arthroplasty (RA). Both groups were comparable regarding age, gender, follow-up time interval, time interval from primary hip arthroplasty to fracture and rate of cemented femoral components, but more type C fractures were treated by ORIF.

RESULTS

Functional outcome expressed by the median timed "Up and Go" test did not differ significantly (30 s ORIF vs. 24 s RA, P = 0.19). However, by comparable systemic complications surgery-related complications were significantly more frequent in plate osteosynthesis (ORIF n = 10 vs. RA n = 3, P = 0.03). Based on our results, further studies, preferable via a multicenter approach, should focus on identifying patients that benefit from ORIF in periprosthetic fractures. A misinterpretation of type B2 fractures with loose implant as type B1 fractures may cause implant failure in case of ORIF.

CONCLUSION

The use of angular stable implants, additional cable wires or bone enhancing means is recommended.

Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections

Periprosthetic fractures are fractures that occur in association with an orthopaedic implant, most often used for joint arthroplasty or fracture fixation. They are associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality in some cases. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures appears to be increasing as a result of increasing patient longevity, more demanding activity levels that persist into advanced age for some patients, and as a result of the increasing rate of revision arthroplasty which accompanies increasing patient longevity. Implant, surgeon, and patient factors all contribute to the risk of periprosthetic fracture. In this review, we intend to discuss current trends in periprosthetic fractures and risk factors associated with their development in the joint arthroplasty and fracture patient.

Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the radiological and clinical results of our study subjects according to the management algorithm of the Vancouver classification system for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 18 hips with postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures. The average follow-up was 49 months. The fracture type was determined based on the Vancouver classification system. The management algorithm of the Vancouver classification system was generally applied, but it was modified in some cases according to the surgeon's decision. At the final follow-up, we assessed the radiological results using Beals and Tower's criteria. The functional results were also evaluated by calculating the Harris hip scores.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 18 cases (94.4%) achieved primary union at an average of 25.5 weeks. The mean Harris hip score was 92. There was 1 case of nonunion, which was a type C fracture after cemented total hip arthroplasty, and this required a strut allograft. Subsidence was noted in 1 case, but the fracture was united despite the subsidence. There was no other complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we somewhat veered out of the management algorithm of the Vancouver classification system, the customized treatment, with considering the stability of the femoral stem and the configuration of the fracture, showed favorable overall results.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty - a review

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) are among the more difficult and expensive complications of total hip arthroplasty. A rise in the elderly population and increase use of primary hip replacement has led to an escalating incidence. They can occur intra operatively and post operatively. The treatment algorithm defined by the Vancouver classification has universal acceptance. The epidemiology, etiology, classification and the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty are reviewed.

Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: a review of biomechanical testing

BACKGROUND

periprosthetic femoral fracture can occur following total hip arthroplasty. Fixation of these fractures are challenging due to the combination of fractured bone with an existing prosthesis. There are several clinical studies reporting the failure of fixation methods used for these fractures, highlighting the importance of further biomechanical studies in this area.

METHODS

the current literature on biomechanical models of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation is reviewed. The methodologies involved in the experimental and computational studies of this fixation are described and compared.

FINDINGS

areas which require further investigation are highlighted and the potential use of finite element analysis as a computational tool to test the current fixation methods is addressed.

INTERPRETATION

biomechanical models have huge potential to assess the effectiveness of different fixation methods. Experimental in vitro models have been used to mimic periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation however, the numbers of measurements that are possible in these studies are relatively limited due to the cost and data acquisition constraints. Computer modelling and in particular finite element analysis is a complimentary method that could be used to examine existing protocols for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture and, potentially, find optimum fixation methods for specific fracture types.

The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement

Peri-prosthetic fracture after joint replacement in the lower limb is associated with significant morbidity. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture after total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) over a ten-year period using a population-based linked dataset.

Between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 2008, 52 136 primary THRs, 8726 revision THRs, 44 511 primary TKRs, and 3222 revision TKRs were performed. Five years post-operatively, the rate of fracture was 0.9% after primary THR, 4.2% after revision THR, 0.6% after primary TKR and 1.7% after revision TKR. Comparison of survival analysis for all primary and revision arthroplasties showed peri-prosthetic fractures were more likely in females, patients aged > 70 and after revision arthroplasty.

Female patients aged > 70 should be warned of a significantly increased risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after hip or knee replacement. The use of adjuvant medical treatment to reduce the effect of peri-prosthetic osteoporosis may be a direction of research for these patients.

Interprosthetic femoral fractures

OBJECTIVE

Interprosthetic femoral fractures, ones occurring between ipsilateral total hip and total knee arthroplasties, are an increasingly common and challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report specific fracture locations and treatment outcomes associated with a protocol of femoral plate fixation that spanned the interprosthetic zone applied with modern soft tissue preserving reduction techniques without adjuvant bone grafts.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

One Level I and one Level II trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A consecutive cohort of 25 patients with 26 interprosthetic femur fractures surgically treated by one of four orthopaedic traumatologists were retrospectively reviewed. There were nine fractures of the femoral shaft (Orthopaedic Trauma Association [OTA] 32) about hip arthroplasty prostheses and 17 supracondylar fractures (OTA 33) about total knee prostheses. Five patients with six fractures were excluded as a result of lack of follow up (n = 4) or deviation from the treatment protocol (n = 2). The remaining 20 fractures were all low-energy closed injuries in elderly patients (average age 80 years; range, 56-98 years; 14 females and six males).

INTERVENTION

A common surgical treatment protocol included plate fixation that spanned the entire interprosthetic zone (overlapping the stem proximally and knee component distally) and the use of biologic tissue-preserving plating techniques without use of supplemental bone grafts of any kind.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fracture healing, time to full weightbearing, malunion, nonunion, and the presence of any hardware failure.

RESULTS

Supracondylar interprosthetic fracture patterns (OTA 33A) were two times more common than proximal diaphyseal fractures (OTA 32) (Vancouver B), 65% versus 35%. All 20 fractures healed after the index procedure. The average time to weightbearing as tolerated was 13 weeks (range, 6-22 weeks). There were three malunions (one 10° valgus, one 9° extension, and one 10° flexion), two cases of painful implants (one required removal), and one loose long-stem revision hip prosthesis (required total femur replacement). All other implants remained well-fixed. All complications occurred in patients with supracondylar fracture patterns. There were no additional associated peri-implant fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Interprosthetic femoral fractures tend to occur more frequently in the supracondylar region about total knee arthroplasty components than in the diaphysis about hip stems. Modern biologic plating techniques that span the entire interprosthetic zone to eliminate additional stress risers show reliable union rates without the use of adjuvant bone graft while maintaining limb alignment and implant survivorship.

Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery

BACKGROUND

Metallic wires and cables are commonly used in primary and revision THA for fixation of periprosthetic fractures and osteotomies of the greater trochanter. These systems provide secure fixation and high healing rates but fraying, third-body generation, accelerated wear of the bearing surface, and injury to the surgical team remain concerning.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined the rate of cable failure, union, and complications associated with a novel, nonmetallic cerclage cable in periprosthetic fracture and osteotomy fixation during THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients who had primary and revision THAs using nonmetallic cables. Indications for use included fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy, intraoperative fracture of the proximal femur, strut allograft fixation, and a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture of the femur. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically immediately postoperatively, at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and then annually thereafter. The minimum followup was 13 months (mean, 21 months; range, 13-30 months).

RESULTS

Two of the 29 patients (7%) developed a nonunion; all remaining osteotomies, fractures and allografts had healed at the time of most recent evaluation. Four patients (14%) dislocated postoperatively; two were treated successfully with closed reduction, while the other two required reoperation. We identified no evidence of breakage or other complications directly attributable to the cables.

CONCLUSIONS

The nonmetallic periprosthetic cables used in this series provided adequate fixation to allow for both osteotomy and fracture healing. We did not observe any complications directly related to the cables. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

USE OF CORTICAL STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGOUS BONE GRAFT IN FEMORAL RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY

To perform a clinical and radiographic assessment of patients undergoing surgical treatment using a cortical structural homologous bone graft for femoral reconstruction following mechanical failure of total hip arthroplasty and periprosthetic fractures. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 27 patients who underwent surgical treatment for femoral reconstruction following mechanical failure of total hip arthroplasty (12 cases) and periprosthetic fractures (15 cases), using a cortical structural homologous bone graft and cemented implants, between June 1999 and February 2008. Of these, 21 fulfilled all the criteria required for this study. The patients underwent pre and postoperative clinical assessments using the Harris Hip Score. Preoperative, immediate postoperative and late postoperative radiographs were also evaluated, with comparisons of fracture consolidation, radiographic signs of graft consolidation, changes to the bone stock and femoral bone quality, and femoral alignment. Results: Nine patients (42.9%) underwent femoral reconstruction following mechanical failure of total hip arthroplasty and 12 cases (57.1%) underwent femoral reconstruction following periprosthetic fracture. Regarding the postoperative clinical classification, the results were considered satisfactory in 85.7% of the cases and unsatisfactory in 14.3%. Radiographic signs of graft consolidation were seen in all cases. There was an increase in bone stock in 90.5% of the hip reconstructions, as measured by the cortical index. Furthermore, the changes to femoral bone quality were considered good in 66.7% of the cases. Conclusion: The use of cortical structural homologous bone grafts for both femoral reconstructive surgery on total hip arthroplasty and periprosthetic fractures is a good treatment option for selected cases, enabling satisfactory clinical and radiographic results.

[Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty : classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies]

The number of periprosthetic fractures following hip replacement is increasing due to longer life expectancy and the rising number of joint replacements. The main causes of periprosthetic fractures include trauma, implant specific factors or loosening of the endoprosthesis. When planning therapy, surgeons should consider specific and general implant- and patient-related risk factors to ensure the best possible treatment. Established classification systems can facilitate preoperative planning. At present, the Vancouver classification system probably comes closest to the ideal, as it considers fracture configuration, stability of the implant and quality of the bone stock. Depending on these factors, therapeutic options include conservative treatment, fracture stabilisation or replacement of the endoprosthesis. The problems associated with periprosthetic fractures of varying etiology and the available treatment options are discussed against the background of the established classification systems.

[Results and complications in the treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with a locked plate system]

BACKGROUND

Locked plate devices offer advantages in the treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with fixed total hip or total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early results and complications with a locked plate system (NCB-DF(R)).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 31 patients (mean age 76 years, 7 males, 24 females) with a femur fracture above a fixed total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n=12) or a total hip arthroplasty (THA, n=19) were treated with a locked plate.

RESULTS

There were 11 complications necessitating revision: 6 implant failures, 2 in patients with a THA and 4 in patients with a TKA, 4 hematomas and 1 infection and 2 patients died. After 6 months all fractures had healed securely but a secondary correction was necessary in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with a locked plate system provided satisfactory results in patients with a THA, however, the relatively high implant failure rate in fractures above a stable TKA is a cause for concern.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures: the minimally invasive fixation option

Increasingly frequent periprosthetic fractures are affecting the elderly; this patients group often suffers from significant co-morbidities that make it particularly difficult to manage these already complex injuries. The classic pitfalls of conservative treatment are many, including infections, pseudarthrosis and the growing necessity of different postoperative supports. We present an internal fixation technique by minimally invasive surgery to manage periprosthetic fractures. The hardware used is a locking plate, with manufacturers' recommendations usually allowing immediate weight bearing. This minimally invasive method provides optimal stability to the fixation, while avoiding the open approach shortcomings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV: retrospective or historical series.

Type C periprosthetic fractures treated with locking plate fixation with a mean follow up of 2.5 years

BACKGROUND

Type C periprosthetic femoral fractures present fixation problems related to the extent of the fracture and the quality of the bone stock.

OBJECTIVES

The authors report a continuous and prospective series of type C periprosthetic femoral fractures to assess the mechanical stability of the femoral implant and the clinical outcome at the medium term.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between April 2004 and November 2006, we treated 17 patients (15 females, two males) presenting a prosthetic hip fracture (12 cases), between the hip prosthesis and the knee (one case), and with a knee prosthesis (four cases). All the implants had no sign of loosening at the time of fracture. The patients' mean age was 76.7 years (range, 39-93 years). Internal fixation was obtained with a locking compression plate (LCP) Synthes bridging the implant in place to prevent a weak zone. The rehabilitation protocol consisted in full weight bearing as much as possible.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up of the series was 31.5 months (range, 4-51 months). Four deaths were recorded during the follow-up. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 15 patients.Total loading was possible immediately in 10 patients, partial loading at 20 kg in three patients,and no loading was possible until 6 weeks in four patients. Two infections and a bending-type mechanical complication of the plate secondary to a fall were observed. Consolidation was obtained in all cases with the appearance of callus formation beginning in the 6th week.

DISCUSSION

The technique used allies the principle of closed internal fixation (with preservation of the fracture hematoma) with mechanical stability. The screws locking to the plate warrant an internal fixator with increased stability that is sufficient for early loading with no risk of losing the secondary axis. Despite this increased rigidity, we did not observe any particular stress on the femoral implants. We recommend bridging the implant and spaced locking for better distribution of the stresses during loading. This hardware, with, if possible, insertion using a reduced approach, seems adapted to periprosthetic femoral fractures, particularly in the elderly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prospective therapeutic study.

Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty

Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around the stem of a total hip arthroplasty are increasing in frequency. To obtain optimal results, full appreciation of the clinical evaluation, classification, and modern management principles and techniques is required. Although periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with a loose stem requires complex revision arthroplasty, fractures associated with a stable femoral stem can be managed effectively with osteosynthesis principles familiar to most orthopaedic surgeons. Femoral fracture around a stable femoral stem is classified as a Vancouver type B1 fracture. The preferred treatment consists of internal fixation, following open or indirect reduction. Emerging techniques, such as percutaneous plating and the use of locking plates, have been used with increasing frequency. Preliminary results of these techniques are promising; however, further prospective comparative studies are required.

Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures

OBJECTIVE

Report treatment results of periprosthetic femoral fractures adjacent or at the tip of a stable femoral stem (Vancouver Type B1) using a locked compression plate as the sole method of fracture stabilisation.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Academic Level I Trauma Centre.

PATIENTS

Patients operatively treated at our institution with locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic fractures between 2002 and 2006 with at least 12 weeks of clinical follow-up were included. Patient demographics, hip arthroplasty implant characteristics, and AO/OTA fracture type were recorded.

INTERVENTION

Open reduction internal fixation using a locked-plate spanning a majority of the femur through a lateral soft-tissue sparing approach. No cortical onlay allografts or cerclage devices (wires or cables) were used.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Clinical union was defined at a minimum of 12 weeks as ability to walk, with or without the use of a walking aide, without pain at or around the fracture site. Radiographic union was defined by bridging bone spanning two or more cortices on orthogonal radiographs of the femur.

RESULTS

Ten subjects met the inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 27 weeks (range 14-97 weeks). All achieved fracture union at a mean of 17 weeks (range 12-27 weeks). There were no hardware failures or changes in fracture alignment from operative radiographs. There were no major complications that necessitated reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Open reduction internal fixation of Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures using a lateral locked-plate that spans the full extent of the femur as the sole method of stabilisation is a successful treatment method that minimises soft-tissue dissection and provides adequate fixation strength to maintain fracture alignment to fracture union.

Compress periprosthetic fractures: interface stability and ease of revision

Periprosthetic fractures after massive endoprosthetic reconstructions pose a reconstructive challenge and jeopardize limb preservation. Compressive osseointegration technology offers the promise of relative ease of prosthetic revision, since fixation is achieved by means of a short intramedullary device. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 221 patients who had Compress((R)) devices implanted in two centers between December, 1996 and December, 2008. The mean followup was 50 months (range, 1-123 months). Six patients (2.7%) sustained periprosthetic fractures and eight (3.6%) had nonperiprosthetic ipsilateral limb fractures occurring from 4 to 79 months postoperatively. All periprosthetic fractures occurred in patients with distal femoral implants (6/154, 3.9%). Surgery was performed in all six patients with periprosthetic femur fractures and for one with a nonperiprosthetic patellar fracture. The osseointegrated interface was radiographically stable in all 14 cases. All six patients with periprosthetic fracture underwent limb salvage procedures. Five patients had prosthetic revision; one patient who had internal fixation of the fracture ultimately underwent amputation for persistent infection. Periprosthetic fractures involving Compress((R)) fixation occur infrequently and most can be treated successfully with further surgery. When implant revision is needed, the bone preserved by virtue of using a shorter intramedullary Compress((R)) device as compared to conventional stems, allows for less complex surgery, making limb preservation more likely.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: current concepts in their management

Peri-prosthetic fractures (PFF) are complex management problems in orthopaedic surgery. Their treatment has evolved with advances in principles of internal fixation and revision hip surgery. Current classification systems look at anatomical location, prosthesis stability and bone quality. Recent evidence highlights the importance of fracture stability in treatment planning, the weaknesses of single plating, the increasing role of long stem revision and also the importance of bone allografts. We present the principles of management of both intra and post-operative PFFs, including surgical techniques and published outcomes.

Polyaxial Locked Implants in the Treatment of Type Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur: Retrospective Clinical Examination in 58 Cases with Review of the Literature

We concluded a retrospective study of the outcomes of a consecutive series of Vancouver B1 and C femoral injuries using two specific locked implants. The study center is a dedicated trauma hospital with a large catchment area. Over a five-year period we treated 58 patients with a periprosthetic fracture of the femur with an angular stable plate, defined as the index procedure. The mean age at the index procedure was 72.4 years; 40 patients were female (69%). In 32 cases (55.2%) we saw a hip endoprosthesis, in 21 cases (36.2%) a knee endoprosthesis, and in five cases both (8.6%). Outcome measures were intra- and postoperative complications, bony union, degree of mobility and social status with comparison to the preoperative status, Barthel index, and timed ''up and go'' test. Union occurred in 56 cases (96.5%) after the index procedure. Three patients were bedridden before the injury; the remainder regained full weight-bearing status. The mean duration until full weight-bearing status in these patients was 8.6 weeks (4-13). Early implant failure with proximal dislocation of the screws occurred in two cases (3.5% revision rate). At follow up, 78% had maintained the same social status as before the injury. Fifty-two patients (89%) had regained their previous level of mobility. The mean Barthel index was 85 points (70-100) out of a possible 100, and improved from a mean of 35 points at the start of rehabilitation. It decreased on average by ten points compared to the preoperative status. The mean ''up and go'' time was measured as 21.4 s. In conclusion, polyaxial plates can achieve excellent surgical results. On the other hand, patients with this type of injury exhibit a clear deterioration in their social status, especially regarding lower limb motor function and self-independence.

Management of late periprosthetic femur fractures: a retrospective cohort of 72 patients

We present our series of 72 patients with periprosthetic fractures. The Vancouver classification was used to evaluate the fractures; there was one type A, seven type B1, 42 type B2, 17 type B3 and five type C fractures. Demographics, pre and postoperative data using Charnley-D'Aubigne-Postel score for assessment of function were recorded. The mean follow-up for all patients was two years. The overall outcome of treatment was graded as excellent, good or poor. An excellent result indicated that the arthroplasty was stable with minimal deformity and no shortening. Stable subsidence of the prosthesis or when the fracture healed with moderate deformity or shortening was deemed as a good result. A loose prosthesis, nonunion, sepsis, severe deformity or shortening was considered poor. In our series 79% (n = 57) had good or excellent results following surgical intervention and 21% (n = 15) had complications; they all had undergone re-operation for various reasons such as nonunion, loosening, dislocation or infection. In B2 fractures the stem is unstable and hence revision of the prosthetic stem has been recommended with or without additional fixation. For B3 fractures an allograft prosthesis composite or tumour prosthesis is considered the treatment choice.

Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs

INTRODUCTION

The causes of periprosthetic fractures of the femur due to the design of the prosthesis and the individual parameters of the patient are unexplored. By different anchorage techniques in cementless total hip arthroplasties, it is assumed that there are various load limits of the implant's bearing femur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present study, we compared a standard hip stem (cementless Spotorno) and a short-stemmed design (Mayo) by an artificial reproduction of periprosthetic fractures in 20 femur specimens.

RESULTS

The measured fracture loads showed an extensive range, with higher maximum loads in the standard stem group. The bone mineral density and the subsiding pattern of the standard stems showed a significant correlation to the incidence of the periprosthetic fractures. In the experimental setup, a slightly lower fracture resistance was shown for the short-stemmed prosthesis. Additionally, it was shown that donors with a higher body mass index had a significantly increased fracture risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-stemmed prostheses, especially the Mayo hip, do not constitute a higher fracture risk. In general, an increased body mass index among patients with a cementless hip stem is associated with an increased fracture risk, particularly at high load values, i.e., resulting from a step during stumbling. Taking into account the ascertained results, the danger of provoking a femoral periprosthetic fracture can be reduced.

Modular cementless total hip arthroplasty for multiple epiphyseal dysplasia

We analyzed a consecutive series of 23 total hip arthroplasties that had been performed using modular cementless prostheses in 13 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia and end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip. The average Harris hip score improved from 40.6 to 93.8 points. Postoperatively, all hips demonstrated favorable alterations in the biomechanical parameters including hip center of rotation, femoral offset, femoral neck length, and limb length. At a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, no hip required revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular or femoral component. One patient (1 hip, 4.3%) underwent reoperation for polyethylene wear and osteolysis 8 years after index arthroplasty. This study shows encouraging clinical and radiographic outcomes of modular cementless total hip arthroplasties for this technically difficult condition.

Subsidence of uncemented stems in osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic cadaveric femora

The increased use of uncemented stems for hip arthroplasty and of fast-recovery protocols in elderly patients make initial stem stability and resistance to fracture critical factors in osteoporotic bone. In this paper, the subsidence and failure of two uncemented stem designs (M/L Taper and VerSys Fullcoat, Zimmer, Inc, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) in osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic cadaveric femora were compared under simulated walking conditions (axial compression and external rotation). Osteoporotic femora implanted with either stem design failed significantly more frequently than did non-osteoporotic femora. Femora implanted with the M/L stems (seven of ten by 1000 cycles) fractured earlier than did femora implanted with the Fullcoat stem (one of ten by 1000 cycles). The use of early weight-bearing protocols with uncemented stem designs in osteoporotic bone should be approached with caution.

European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures

The Vancouver classification has been shown by its developers to be a valid and reliable method for categorising the configuration of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures and for planning their management. We have re-validated this classification system independently using the radiographs of 30 patients with periprosthetic fractures. These were reviewed by six experienced consultant orthopaedic surgeons, six trainee surgeons and six medical students in order to assess intra- and interobserver reliability and reproducibility. Each observer read the radiographs on two separate occasions. The results were subjected to weighted kappa statistical analysis.

The respective kappa values for interobserver agreement were 0.72 and 0.74 for consultants, 0.68 and 0.70 for trainees on the first and second readings of the radiographs and 0.61 for medical students. The intra-observer agreement for the consultants was 0.64 and 0.67, for the trainees 0.61 and 0.64, and for the medical students 0.59 and 0.60 for the first and second readings, respectively. The validity of the classification was studied by comparing the pre-operative radiological findings within B subgroups with the operative findings. This revealed agreement for 77% of these type-B fractures, with a kappa value of 0.67.

Our data confirm the reliability and reproducibility of this classification system in a European setting and for inexperienced staff. This is a reliable system which can be used by non-experts, between centres and across continents.

Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management

Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures are becoming more common given the increased prevalence of revision total hip arthroplasty and increased use of cementless fixation. Risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic fractures include the use of minimally invasive techniques; the use of press-fit cementless stems; revision operations, especially when a long cementless stem is used or when a short stem with impaction allografting is used; female sex; metabolic bone disease; bone diseases leading to altered morphology such as Paget disease; and technical errors at the time of the operation. Appropriate treatment of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures does not compromise the long-term results of total hip arthroplasty unless the bone damage precludes stable fixation of the implant.

Extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur

Periprosthetic femur fractures after total hip arthroplasty are a growing concern as their prevalence is expected to rise. A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty with an extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) for treatment of a Vancouver B2/B3 fracture at our institution. Fourteen patients were identified having a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed for all patients. At a mean 44.5 months of follow-up, mean modified D'Aubigne and Postel scores were 8.6. In all cases the ETO and fracture healed with radiographic evidence of osseointegration of the femoral component. Use of an ETO for the treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures provides excellent exposure, facilitates component implantation, and is compatible with fracture healing and good short-term clinical results.

Use of an 'internal proximal femoral replacement' with distal fixation in revision arthroplasty of the hip

We have managed 27 patients (16 women and 11 men) with a mean age of 68.4 years (50 to 84), with failed total hip replacement and severe proximal femoral bone loss by revision using a distal fix/proximal wrap prosthesis. The mean follow-up was for 55.3 months (25 to 126). The mean number of previous operations was 2.2 (1 to 4). The mean Oxford hip score decreased from 46.2 (38 to 60) to 28.5 (17 to 42) (paired t-test, p < 0.001) and the mean Harris Hip score increased from 30.4 (3 to 57.7) to 71.7 (44 to 99.7) (paired t-test, p < 0.001). There were two dislocations, and in three patients we failed to eradicate previous infection. None required revision of the femoral stem. This technique allows instant distal fixation while promoting biological integration and restoration of bone stock. In the short term, the functional outcome is encouraging and the complication rates acceptable in this difficult group of patients.

[Treatment of femoral fracture on previous implants with minimally-invasive surgery and total weight-bearing: benefit of locking plate. Preliminary report]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

We report a consecutive prospective series of femoral fractures on previous implants. The purpose was to assess treatment with locking compression plates and total weight-bearing.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

From June 2002 to December 2005, we treated 21 patients (16 women, five men) for fractures on previous implants: total hip arthroplasty (n=11), total knee arthroplasty (n=1), unicompartmental prosthesis (n=1), gamma nail (n=4), hip screw (n=1). Mean patient age was 75.8 years (range 39-90). Osteosynthesis was performed on an orthopedic table or on a standard table using a minimally-invasive approach for fixation with a locking compression plate (Synthes) LCP) to bridge the implants in place and avoid any zone of weakness. The rehabilitation protocol included immediate total weight bearing.

RESULTS

At last follow-up there were three deaths and one failure so that there were 17 patients with a mean follow-up of 15.9 months (range 6-45 months). The following outcomes were noted. Minimally-invasive surgery was used in 18 cases, access to the fracture focus in three. Total weight bearing was possible immediately after surgery in 12 patients and partial weight bearing (20 kg) for two. There were two infections, two general complications and one early displacement. Healing was achieved at 6-10 weeks. Misalignment greater than 10 degrees was noted in three cases.

DISCUSSION

This work illustrates the use of locking plates for minimally-invasive repair of fractures on previous implants with total weight bearing. This technique combines the principles of closed fixation and preservation of the fracture hematoma with material stability. In this form, use developed progressively. It is now common practice to use plate fixation for femoral fractures. The LISS system was then developed progressively for minimally-invasive repair of distal fractures. We widened the concept to include more proximal approaches. The use of the locking screws in the plate corresponds to what could be called an internal external fixator with three pins (two corresponding to the cortical screws plus the plate), which enable a solid fixation. Screw hold seems to be sufficient to allow early weight bearing.

CONCLUSION

Locking plates have been shown to be an effective treatment for femoral fractures on previous implants allowing a stable fixation sufficient for early weight bearing.

Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur

BACKGROUND

Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures is often complex, and few studies have documented its associated mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified from our trauma and surgical registries 106 patients who underwent surgery for a periprosthetic femoral fracture. We then identified a contemporaneous age and sex-matched control cohort of 309 patients who had a hip fracture (femoral neck or intertrochanteric) and 311 patients who underwent primary hip or knee replacement. Mortality at one year was identified with use of the Social Security database.

RESULTS

Twelve (11%) of 106 patients died within one year following surgical treatment of a periprosthetic fracture. During the same follow-up period, fifty-one (16.5%) of 309 patients died following surgery for a hip fracture and nine (2.9%) of 311 patients died following primary joint replacement. The mortality rate after a periprosthetic femoral fracture was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) compared with that for matched patients who had undergone primary joint replacement, and it was similar to the mortality rate after a hip fracture. For periprosthetic fractures, a delay of greater than two days from admission to the time of surgery was associated with an increased mortality rate at one year (p < 0.0007). Forty-nine patients underwent revision arthroplasty for the treatment of a Vancouver type-B periprosthetic fracture, and six (12%) died. In contrast, twenty-four patients with a Vancouver type-B periprosthetic fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation and eight (33%) died. The difference was significant (p < 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate within one year following surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures is high and is similar to that after treatment for hip fractures. Because revision arthroplasty for the treatment of type-B periprosthetic fractures was associated with a one-year mortality rate that was significantly less than that after surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation, in instances when either treatment option is feasible, revision arthroplasty may be the preferred option.

Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by effective lengthening of the prosthesis

The increasing number of hip and knee arthroplasties implies a greater likelihood of periprosthetic fractures and need for successful treatment options. We asked whether in situ effective lengthening of the indwelling prosthesis by a custom-made slotted hollow intramedullary nail provided a reasonable alternative to the established internal fixation techniques and prosthesis exchange. Between 1994 and 2005, we treated 25 patients (four male and 21 female; average age, 80 years) with a hip or knee periprosthetic fracture using this technique. Preconditions included a well-fixed prosthesis with a conical tip. In 23 hip cases a retrograde femur nail and in two knee fracture cases an antegrade nail were used for in situ lengthening of a femoral hip or knee implant stem. In all 25 cases, we used a preoperatively manufactured custom-made implant; in 20 patients, we recommended immediate mobilization by partial or full weightbearing. Eighteen of 25 patients were followed a minimum of 7 months (mean, 25 months; range, 7-31 months). Three patients died and four were lost to followup. We observed fracture healing in all patients, but one female patient had subsequent prosthesis loosening. The major complication rate was 6% (one of 18). We believe effective lengthening of the indwelling prosthesis by a custom-made slotted hollow intramedullary nail is a reasonable option for treating periprosthetic femoral fractures.