Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus: acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach

Endoscopic treatment of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett oesophagus

In the last 5 years, endoscopic therapy for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and early cancer (EC) in Barrett oesophagus has emerged as an effective and safe alternative to surgery. Adequate work-up of patients includes histopathological review of the initial biopsies, a high-resolution endoscopy with four-quadrant random biopsies every 1cm of Barrett mucosa and staging with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopic resection (ER) forms the mainstay of the endoscopic treatment since it provides large tissue specimens for optimal histopathological evaluation. The ER-cap technique with submucosal injection and the 'suck-band-and cut' method are the resection methods most widely used in Barrett oesophagus patients. ER monotherapy for HGIN or EC in Barrett oesophagus is associated with recurrent lesions in up to 30% of treated patients. ER may be combined with ablative techniques such as photodynamic therapy (PDT) to treat all of the mucosa at risk for neoplastic progression. Unlike ER, PDT lacks histopathological correlation and residual Barrett mucosa may remain after treatment or may be hidden underneath the neosquamous epithelium. Management of Barrett oesophagus patients with HGIN or EC should be performed in centres with multi-disciplinary experience in this field and future studies should focus on development of ER techniques that allow radical resection of the whole Barrett segment.

Endoscopic mucosal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus: An Italian experience

AIM: To evaluate endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or intramucosal cancer (IMC) in Barrett’s esophagus (BE).

METHODS: Between June 2000 and December 2003, 39 consecutive patients with HGD (35) and/or IMC (4) underwent EMR. BE >30 mm was present in 27 patients. In three patients with short segment BE (25.0%), HGD was detected in a normal appearing BE. Lesions had a mean diameter of 14.8±10.3 mm. Mucosal resection was carried out using the cap method.

RESULTS: The average size of resections was 19.7±9.4×14.6±8.2 mm. Histopathologic assessment post-resection revealed 5 low-grade dysplasia (LGD) (12.8%), 27 HGD (69.2%), 2 IMC (5.1%), and 5 SMC (-12.8%). EMR changed the pre-treatment diagnosis in 10 patients (25.6%). Three patients with SMC underwent surgery. Histology of the surgical specimen revealed 1 T0N0 and 2 T1N0 lesions. The remaining two patients were cancer free at 32.5 and 45.6 mo, respectively. A metachronous lesion was detected after 25 mo in one patient with HGD. Intra-procedural bleeding, controlled at endoscopy, occurred in four patients (10.3%). After a median follow-up of 34.9 mo, all patients remained in remission.

CONCLUSION: In the medium term, EMR is effective and safe to treat HGD and/or IMC within BE and is a valuable staging method. It could become an alternative to surgery.

Current Strategies in the management of Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus has become a very important topic in gastroenterology. Its management may vary from essentially a surveillance strategy to highly invasive esophagectomy. The variation in management strategies has occurred because of the current perceptions regarding cancer risks, which range from almost negligible to an incidence of 30% in high-grade dysplasia. Although it is clear that most patients with Barrett's esophagus without dysplasia will not require therapy, the prospect of continued surveillance is unpleasant at best. Promising future tools and techniques for surveillance and treatment are described in this review.

Early esophageal cancer: pattern of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for long-term survival after surgical resection

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and pattern of lymphatic spread in patients with early squamous cell and adenocarcinoma and identify prognostic factors for long-term survival after resection and lymphadenectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Limited endoscopic approaches without lymphadenectomy are increasingly applied in patients with early esophageal cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 290 patients with early esophageal cancer (157 adenocarcinoma, 133 squamous cell cancer) had surgical resection with systematic lymphadenectomy. Specimens were assessed for prevalence and pattern of lymphatic spread. Prognostic factors were determined by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

None of the 70 patients with adenocarcinoma limited to themucosa had lymphatic spread, as compared with 2 of 26 with mucosal squamous cell cancer. Lymphatic spread was more common in patients with submucosal squamous cell cancer as compared with submucosal adenocarcinoma (36.4% versus 20.7%). Although lymph node metastases were usually limited to locoregional lymph node stations in early adenocarcinoma, distant lymphatic spread was frequent in early squamous cell cancer. On multivariate analysis, only histologic tumor type and the presence of lymph node metastases were independent predictors of long-term survival. Five-year survival rate was 83.4% for early adenocarcinoma versus 62.9% for early squamous cell cancer and 48.2% versus 79.5% for patients with/without lymphatic spread.

DISCUSSION

Prevalence and pattern of lymphatic spread as well as long-term prognosis differ markedly between early esophageal squamous cell and adenocarcinoma. Limited resection techniques and individualized lymphadenectomy strategies appear applicable in patients with early adenocarcinoma.

Early esophageal cancer: pattern of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for long-term survival after surgical resection

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and pattern of lymphatic spread in patients with early squamous cell and adenocarcinoma and identify prognostic factors for long-term survival after resection and lymphadenectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Limited endoscopic approaches without lymphadenectomy are increasingly applied in patients with early esophageal cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 290 patients with early esophageal cancer (157 adenocarcinoma, 133 squamous cell cancer) had surgical resection with systematic lymphadenectomy. Specimens were assessed for prevalence and pattern of lymphatic spread. Prognostic factors were determined by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

None of the 70 patients with adenocarcinoma limited to themucosa had lymphatic spread, as compared with 2 of 26 with mucosal squamous cell cancer. Lymphatic spread was more common in patients with submucosal squamous cell cancer as compared with submucosal adenocarcinoma (36.4% versus 20.7%). Although lymph node metastases were usually limited to locoregional lymph node stations in early adenocarcinoma, distant lymphatic spread was frequent in early squamous cell cancer. On multivariate analysis, only histologic tumor type and the presence of lymph node metastases were independent predictors of long-term survival. Five-year survival rate was 83.4% for early adenocarcinoma versus 62.9% for early squamous cell cancer and 48.2% versus 79.5% for patients with/without lymphatic spread.

DISCUSSION

Prevalence and pattern of lymphatic spread as well as long-term prognosis differ markedly between early esophageal squamous cell and adenocarcinoma. Limited resection techniques and individualized lymphadenectomy strategies appear applicable in patients with early adenocarcinoma.

Endoscopic mucosal resection: treatment of neoplasia

Techniques of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can dramatically improve the ability to diagnose and treat superficial lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Early cancers, submucosal tumors, and sessile polyps can be safely and completely removed in a single procedure, with long-term outcome results comparable to surgery. This is accomplished with a minimum cost, morbidity, and mortality and with little or no impact on the quality of life of patients. This article provides an overview of the techniques, indications, and outcomes of EMR in the management of GI malignancy.

Endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus

With the increase in the rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States and the Western world matched with the high morbidity and mortality of esophagectomy, there is an increasing need for new and effective techniques to treat and prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma. A wide variety of endoscopic mucosal ablative techniques have been developed for early esophageal neoplasia. However, long-term control of neoplasic risk has not been demonstrated. Most studies show that specialized intestinal metaplasia may persist underneath neo-squamous mucosa, posing a risk for subsequent neoplastic progression. In this article we review current published literature on endoscopic therapies for the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Long-term results of photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid for superficial Barrett's cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) has proven to be safe and effective in patients with early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. However, long-term results in patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or with early cancer are still lacking.

METHODS

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of ALA-PDT and the survival of patients with early Barrett's neoplasia. ALA-PDT was carried out in 66 patients. Protoporphyrin IX induced by oral administration of ALA (60 mg/kg body weight orally applied 4-6 hours before PDT) was used as the photosensitizer. Acid suppression was maintained in all patients.

RESULTS

Between September 1996 and September 2002, 667 patients with early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus were referred for local endoscopic therapy. A total of 558 patients fulfilled the criteria for local endoscopic therapy, and 66 patients (mean [standard deviation] age 61.4 [10.2] years) with HGIN (group A; n = 35) and early adenocarcinoma (group B; n = 31) were treated by PDT. A total of 82 ALA-PDT were performed. A total of 34 of the 35 patients in group A (97%) and all patients in group B (100%) achieved a complete response during a median follow-up period of 37 months (interquartile range 23-55) (not significant). One local recurrence was observed in group A and 10 in group B (p < 0.005). Seven patients died during follow-up; but, all deaths were not tumor related. No major complications were observed. Disease-free survival in patients with HGIN was 89%, and, in patients with mucosal cancer, it was 68%. The calculated 5-year survival was 97% in group A and 80% in group B, but there occurred no death related to Barrett's neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent long-term results of PDT with ALA in patients with HGIN or mucosal cancer might offer PDT with ALA as an alternative to surgical esophagectomy and endoscopic resection, especially in cases with multifocal Barrett's neoplasia.

Endoscopic ultrasound for luminal malignancies

Luminal gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers are responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality. Since the first pairing of ultrasonography with endoscopy in 1980, technologic advances and the increased availability of trained endosonographers have propelled endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to the forefront of luminal GI cancer staging. In this article we discuss the role of EUS for evaluating luminal GI cancers.

Management of superficial Barrett's epithelium-related neoplasms by endoscopic mucosal resection: clinicopathologic analysis of 27 cases

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), a relatively new endoluminal therapeutic technique with low morbidity and no mortality reported to date, is advocated for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related superficial neoplasms. However, recent studies revise its success downward, particularly regarding the ability to achieve complete excision. To evaluate what remains an evolving technique, we analyzed our experience with a series of 27 esophageal EMRs (20 lesions in 18 patients). Our goal was to evaluate the diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic advantages of EMR separately by correlating the initial biopsies and pre-EMR endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) staging with the final histologic diagnoses and stage. Persistence/recurrence of neoplastic tissue was also correlated with the margin status of the resections. The mean size of the neoplasms, which included low-grade dysplasias (n=2), high-grade dysplasias (n=8), intramucosal carcinomas (n=14), and submucosal invasive carcinomas (n=3), was 11 mm. EUS correctly reported an intramucosal or submucosal lesion in 70% of the cases while it overstaged 18% and understaged 12% of the cases. The biopsy diagnosis corresponded to the EMR diagnosis in 63% of the cases. The biopsy underestimated the grade of the lesion in 21% of the cases. EMR revealed a lower histologic grade compared with the biopsy in 16% of the cases. The resection was microscopically complete in only 4% of the cases. No residual/recurrent disease was observed in 10 lesions (9 patients) at 4 to 63 months (mean, 23 months) post-EMR. However, 9 lesions (8 patients) persisted/recurred 28 days to 25 months (mean, 6 months) after treatment; 56% of the cases with positive lateral margin(s) and negative deep margin persisted/recurred. However, 86% of the EMRs with positive deep margin showed residual tumor/recurrence on follow-up biopsies. In conclusion, we observed that EMR offers improved diagnosis and staging as compared with biopsy and EUS. This is a significant advantage since it can modify patients' management. However, frequent incompleteness of resection and high persistence/recurrence are significant pitfalls that dictate continued endoscopic surveillance.

Tailored therapy for early Barrett's lesions

Alternatives to oesophagectomy

Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus

Barrett's oesophagus is the premalignant precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Non-dysplastic metaplasia can progress to low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and finally to invasive cancer. Although the frequency of adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's oesophagus is low, surveillance is justified because the outcome of adenocarcinoma is poor. Oesophagectomy remains the standard treatment for patients with high-grade dysplasia and superficial carcinoma. However, it has been associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and some patients are judged unfit for surgery. In this review, the present status of less invasive procedures is discussed. Endotherapy preserves the integrity of the oesophagus and allows a better quality of life to patients at low risk of developing lymph-node metastases. Opposition to endoscopic treatment is based mainly on the identification of undetected foci of cancer and high-grade dysplasia in oesophagectomy samples. The current ablative techniques used are photodynamic therapy, argon plasma coagulation, laser treatment, and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: limitations of current management strategies

Dysplasia is a very imperfect biomarker for malignancy in Barrett's esophagus. Invasive cancer has been found in 30-40% of esophagi resected because preoperative endoscopic examinations had shown high-grade dysplasia. Reports on the natural history of this disorder are sometimes contradictory, but suggest that 10-30% of patients with high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus will develop a demonstrable malignancy within 5 yr of the initial diagnosis. Proposed management strategies for high-grade dysplasia include esophagectomy, endoscopic ablative therapies, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and intensive endoscopic surveillance. Endoscopic ablative therapies and EMR may not be effective if neoplastic cells have invaded the submucosa or disseminated through mucosal lymphatic channels, and a number of studies suggest that the endoscopic therapies usually leave metaplastic or neoplastic epithelium with malignant potential behind. Limited data suggest that intensive endoscopic surveillance might be a reasonable approach for elderly or infirm patients, but some patients managed in this fashion have developed incurable esophageal cancers. The fundamental question of what is the appropriate length of follow-up for studies on dysplasia treatments has not been resolved. Although 5 yr might be considered the absolute minimum duration for a meaningful follow-up on dysplasia therapy, the follow-up duration in most studies is substantially less than 5 yr. Specific recommendations for management based on these considerations are proposed at the end of this report.

Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate endoscopic resection (ER) combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of selected patients with early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

Patients with Barrett's esophagus and neoplastic lesions <2 cm in diameter and no sign of submucosal infiltration, positive lymph nodes, or distant metastasis underwent diagnostic ER (cap technique). Patients with a T1sm tumor in the resection specimen were referred for surgery; those with a T1m or a less invasive tumor underwent additional endoscopic therapy (ER, PDT, and/or argon plasma coagulation [APC]), or they were followed. PDT was performed with 5-aminolevulinic acid and a light dose of 100 J/cm 2 at lambda = 632 nm.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients underwent diagnostic ER. Endoscopic treatment was not performed in 5 patients, who underwent surgery (4 T1sm; 1, patient preference). Five patients were immediately entered into a follow-up protocol, and 23 received additional endoscopic treatment (13 additional ER, 19 PDT, 3 APC). Endoscopic treatment was successful in 26/28 patients; no severe complication was observed. During follow-up (median 19 months, range 13-24 months), 5/26 patients had a recurrence of high-grade dysplasia: all were successfully re-treated with ER. At the end of follow-up, 26/33 originally enrolled patients (79%) and 26/28 endoscopically treated patients (93%) were in local remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic therapy is safe and effective for selected patients with early stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Managing Barrett's esophagus: what is new in 2005?

The new developments in the management of Barrett's esophagus in 2005 result in refinements of decision making. New techniques including magnification endoscopy have been used for real-time recognition of intestinal metaplasia but are not yet validated. The finding of BE in patients lacking GERD symptoms highlights the problems of developing screening criteria for the general population. Many experimental optical techniques are pushing the optical recognition of dysplasia to real time. Availability, cost and validation remain barriers to clinical application. Endoscopic mucosal resection is being more widely applied resulting in more accurate staging of patients with early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and helping to define patients amenable to endoscopic therapy. The approval of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of high grade dysplasia adds to the non-operative therapeutic arsenal. The impact of medical therapy of GERD and anti-reflux surgery on the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma is disappointing. Technological developments and emerging efforts in chemoprevention offer promise for the future.

[Reflux esophagitis]

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent diseases in the industrialized countries. Approximately 15-25% of adults suffer from reflux symptoms, characterized mainly by heartburn and/or regurgitation. Currently, antisecretory medication with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or antireflux surgery are the established options for GERD-treatment. PPI are the therapeutic gold standard in acute, long-term or on-demand therapy of GERD. Since PPI do not restore the antireflux barrier but merely suppress acid secretion a life-long tablet adherence is required in most cases. In view of limitations of PPI and the potential risks of laparoscopic surgery, several endoscopic antireflux techniques were developed and may evolve as a valuable third option. However, so far objective long-term data are lacking for choosing the appropriate patient who will benefit most from endoluminal antireflux therapy.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Esophageal Applications

Endoscopic mucosal resection is an invaluable tool to diagnose and potentially treat superficial cancers in Barrett's esophagus as well as squamous cell cancers. The technique can be performed using equipment available in most endoscopic laboratories. The tissue retrieved from these procedures gives the endoscopist histologic information regarding tumor depth of penetration, which is critical to treatment of early cancers. In addition, standard pinch biopsies are often unable to diagnose malignancies that may underlie areas of dysplasia or even normal mucosa. Endoscopic mucosal resection can be used to diagnose these lesions with relative safety, particularly when applied to the esophagus.

Prevention and management of early esophageal cancer

Early esophageal cancer is defined by its limitation to the esophageal mucosa and submucosa. It has become a curable malignant disease, in sharp contrast to the dismal prognosis of esophageal cancer at advanced stages, which still represents the majority of patients. Understanding the risk factors, establishing surveillance programs for patients at risk, and developing preventative interventions such as dietary and lifestyle changes or pharmacologic interventions hold the potential of reducing the incidence of the disease and of shifting the stage distribution toward early cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound examination is pivotal for distinguishing early from advanced stages of the disease because it allows for accurate assessment of tumor infiltration and regional lymph node involvement. The therapeutic mainstay for early esophageal cancer remains surgery. New, less invasive surgical techniques are being tested that are associated with less morbidity and mortality than standard radical esophagectomies. For patients who are not candidates for surgery, definitive chemoradiation is a viable alternative. New endoscopic ablation techniques, such as endoscopic mucosa resection and photodynamic therapy, are potential alternatives to surgery in patients with cancers limited to the mucosa. For patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction with submucosal involvement, adjuvant chemoradiation should be considered because of its potential to increase survival.

Barrett's esophagus

Esophageal cancer staging is a widely accepted indication for endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The evaluation of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with EUS is indicated only when there is high-grade dysplasia or a concern for malignancy in an endoscopic lesion. Because the options for the management of BE and early adenocarcinoma are diverse, proper selection of patients by accurate staging with EUS is critical, particularly when nonoperative management is considered. For example, patients with BE with high-grade dysplasia may be offered esophagectomy in some medical centers, but nonoperative therapies such as endoscopic ablative therapy or mucosal resection may be the preferred treatment options in other gastroenterology practices. This article discusses the scientific evidence for the use of EUS in BE or early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Novel endoscopic therapies for gastrointestinal malignancies: endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic ablation

Gastrointestinal malignancies are often detected at advanced stages when the prognosis is poor. Screening guidelines that vary accord-ing to the regional disease prevalence are needed. High-resolution endoscopy, magnification endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, light autofluorescence endoscopy, and optical coherence tomography are new technologies designed to improve endoscopic detection. Once detected, lesions must be accurately staged, including depth of mucosal penetration and lymph node involvement, to determine endoscopic resectability. Widely applicable, relatively safe, and minimally invasive alternatives to surgery are needed. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic ablation are potentially curative for malignancies limited to the mucosa, obviating the need for surgery in these patients.

Surgery for early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma

Current treatment recommendations for early esophageal adenocarcinoma range from radical esophagectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy, limited surgical resection with/without regional lymphadenectomy to endoscopic mucosectomy or ablation. A comparison of treatment associated morbidity, tumor recurrence rates, and functional outcome suggests that none of these alternatives can be universally recommended. Rather, an individualized strategy should be employed based on depth of tumor penetration into the mucosa/submucosa, presence of lymph node metastases, multicentricity of tumor growth, length of the underlying Barrett mucosa and comorbidity of the affected patient. Endoscopic mucosectomy may suffice for an isolated focus of high-grade neoplasia or mucosal cancer, provided the neoplasia and underlying Barrett mucosa can be removed completely. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for tumors invading the submucosa, multicentric tumors and recurrence after endoscopic mucosectomy. The extent of surgical resection must be guided by the length of the Barrett mucosa. In most instances a complete tumor resection and removal of the entire Barrett mucosa can be achieved by a limited transabdominal approach, and therefore subtotal esophagectomy may not be necessary. Application of the sentinel node technology may in the future allow to limit systematic lymphadenectomy to the rather small subgroup of patients who in fact have lymph node metastases.

Prediction of appropriateness of local endoscopic treatment for high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma by EUS and histopathologic features

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic techniques are being developed for the local treatment of early stage esophageal cancer. However, such therapy is not appropriate for patients with lymph node metastasis. The aim of this study was to analyze the histopathologic features of high-grade dysplasia and early stage adenocarcinoma and to relate these to lymph node involvement.

METHODS

Pathology reports were reviewed for all 367 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or the gastroesophageal junction between January 1993 and December 2001. Patients with histopathologically confirmed high-grade dysplasia or T1 carcinoma were included (n = 77). Pre-operative EUS results were assessed. All lesions were histopathologically subdivided in 6 different stages (mucosal 1-3 and submucosal 1-3).

RESULTS

EUS staged 61 patients as N0. EUS correctly predicted the absence of positive lymph nodes in 57 (93%) of these patients. Histopathologically, m1, m2, m3, and sm1 cancers never had lymph node metastases, whereas 3 of 13 sm2 tumors (23%) and 9 of 13 sm3 tumors (69%) had lymph node involvement. Lymphangio invasion was present exclusively in sm2 and sm3 cancers. Factors that predicted the presence of lymph node metastasis were the following: tumor diameter greater than 3 cm, infiltration of malignancy beyond sm1, poor differentiation grade, and lymphangio invasion, although only infiltration beyond sm1 remained significant in the definitive multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS and the histopathologic features of high-grade dysplasia and early stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or the gastroesophageal junction can predict the presence of lymph node involvement. These data can be used to identify patients for whom local endoscopic treatment may be appropriate.

Photodynamic therapy and endoscopic mucosal resection for Barrett's dysplasia and early esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic ablation with porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy (PDT) have recently been combined to improve the accuracy of histologic staging and remove superficial carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia were evaluated with computed tomography and endosonography. Patients with nodular or irregular folds underwent EMR followed by PDT.

RESULTS

In three patients, endoscopic mucosal resection upstaged the diagnosis to mucosal adenocarcinoma (T1N0M0). PDT successfully ablated the remaining glandular mucosa. Complications were limited to transient chest discomfort and odynophagia.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of EMR resection in Barrett's high-grade dysplasia patients with mucosal irregularities resulted in histologic upstaging to mucosal adenocarcinoma, requiring higher laser light doses for PDT. PDT after EMR appears to be safe and effective for the complete elimination of Barrett's mucosal adenocarcinoma. EMR should be strongly considered for Barrett's dysplasia patients being evaluated for endoscopic ablation therapy.

Widespread EMR: a new technique for removal of large areas of mucosa

BACKGROUND

Widespread EMR is a novel technique for resection of large areas of mucosa as a single bloc. Large lesion size (>2 cm) is a recognized limitation of current EMR techniques. This study assessed the technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety of widespread EMR in a porcine model.

METHODS

Widespread EMR was performed in 6 pigs. A submucosal fluid cushion was created in the distal esophagus by using a 0.83% solution of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. A mucosal strip 5 cm in length and including at least 50% of the luminal circumference was marginated by using a prototype cutting device. The proximal end of the mucosa was stripped from the submucosa by using a grasping forceps. The distal end was snare resected. Resected tissue was assessed histologically. Endoscopy was repeated at weeks 1 and 6. At week 6, a second widespread EMR of the mucosa on the wall opposite the initial resection was attempted to create a full circumferential resection.

RESULTS

Widespread EMR was completed in all animals. The esophagus was denuded of mucosa in 5-cm lengths that included 50% of the circumference of the lumen. No procedure-related complication was observed. Histologic assessment demonstrated that the resection specimen included mucosa and submucosa but not muscularis propria. Endoscopy at 1 week revealed mucosal regrowth in two animals and ulceration in 4. At week 6, regrowth of mucosa was noted in all animals. The second wide EMR proved to be technically difficult and was associated with perforation, peri-esophageal abscess, and stricture formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide EMR appears to be technically feasible for removal of large areas of mucosa. Mucosal strips 5 cm long that included over 50% of the luminal circumference were resected safely. Resection was followed by complete regrowth of the mucosa. However, a second wide EMR to create a circumferential resection proved to be technically difficult and unsafe.

5-Aminolaevulinic acid-induced photodynamic therapy and photodetection in Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is a precursor of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. This cancer has the fastest growing incidence of any solid tumor in the Western world. Surveillance of Barrett's esophagus is routinely undertaken to detect early malignant transformation. However, ablative endoscopic treatments are available and these can obliterate the abnormal epithelium, allowing neosquamous regrowth. Photodynamic therapy using 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) is such a technique. In this non-thermal method of ablation, ALA is metabolized to produce the photosensitizer protoprophyrin IX. This, together with light and oxygen, produces local tissue destruction. Fluorescence detection using ALA has also been used to identify areas of dysplasia and thus enhance positive biopsy yield. The use of ALA in photodynamic therapy and photodetection is reviewed.

A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus: the AGA Chicago Workshop

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) are controversial. We conducted a critical review of the literature in BE to provide guidance on clinically relevant issues.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of 18 participants evaluated the strength and the grade of evidence for 42 statements pertaining to the diagnosis, screening, surveillance, and treatment of BE. Each member anonymously voted to accept or reject statements based on the strength of evidence and his own expert opinion.

RESULTS

There was strong consensus on most statements for acceptance or rejection. Members rejected statements that screening for BE has been shown to improve mortality from adenocarcinoma or to be cost-effective. Contrary to published clinical guidelines, they did not feel that screening should be recommended for adults over age 50, regardless of age or duration of heartburn. Members were divided on whether surveillance prolongs survival, although the majority agreed that it detects curable neoplasia and can be cost-effective in selected patients. The majority did not feel that acid-reduction therapy reduces the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma but did agree that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with a cancer risk reduction and are of promising (but unproven) value. Participants rejected the notion that mucosal ablation with acid suppression prevents adenocarcinoma in BE but agreed that this may be an appropriate strategy in a subgroup of patients with high-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this review of BE, the opinions of workshop members on issues pertaining to screening and surveillance are at variance with published clinical guidelines.

Endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas: Western experience

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic resection of esophageal squamous-cell neoplasia with curative intent appears to be an alternative treatment to radical surgery when the malignant neoplasia is intraepithelial or limited to the mucosal layer, since the risk for lymph-node metastases is very low. In contrast to Japan, there has so far been only limited experience in Europe and the United States with endoscopic resection in such cases. In the present observational study, we report on the largest prospective series so far in Western countries of patients with early squamous-cell cancer or carcinoma in situ, who were treated using endoscopic resection therapy.

METHODS

Between December 1997 and November 2001, 115 patients with a suspicion of early squamous cancer were referred for local endoscopic therapy. A total of 39 patients (mean age 61.4 +/- 10.2 yr) with early esophageal carcinoma (n = 29) and carcinoma in situ (Cis) (n = 10) fulfilled the criteria for local endoscopic therapy and were treated using endoscopic resection. Ten patients had Cis (group A), 19 had mucosal cancer (group B), and 10 had submucosal cancer (group C). All patients in group C were inoperable or had refused surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 94 resections were performed. Nine of the 10 patients in group A (90%), 19 of the 19 in group B (100%), and 8 of the 10 in group C (80%) achieved a complete response during a mean follow-up period of 29.7 +/- 14.3 months. Tumor-related deaths occurred in three patients (one in group B, who was inoperable; two in group C, who refused surgery). No major complications such as perforation or bleeding requiring blood transfusion occurred. Minor complications were seen in six patients (15%)-three with minor bleeding after endoscopic resection and three with esophageal stenoses, who were successfully treated using injection therapy or dilatation. Calculated 5-yr survival was 90% in group A, 89% in group B, and 0% in group C.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection appears to be an effective and safe method of curative treatment in patients with Cis and mucosal squamous-cell carcinomas of the esophagus. The preferred method in patients with submucosal cancer should be esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy, whenever possible.

INK4a-ARF alterations in Barrett's epithelium, intraepithelial neoplasia and Barrett's adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The INK4a-ARF [CDKN2A]- locus on chromosome 9p21 encodes for two tumour suppressor proteins, p16INK4a and p14ARF, which act as upstream regulators of the Rb-CDK4 and p53 pathways. To study the contribution of each pathway to the carcinogenesis of Barrett's adenocarcinoma, we analysed the alterations of p14ARF and p16INK4a in preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions of this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After microdissection, DNA of 15 Barrett's adenocarcinomas, 40 Barrett's intraepithelial neoplasms (n=20 low- and n=20 high-grade) and 15 Barrett's mucosa without neoplasia was analysed for INK4-ARF inactivation using DNA sequence and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, restriction-enzyme-related polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We detected 9p21 LOH, p16INK4a methylation and p16INK4a mutations in Barrett's adenocarcinomas in 5 of 15 (33%), 8 of 15 (53%) and 1 of 15 (7%) patients, respectively. P14ARF was methylated in 3 of 15 (20%) adenocarcinomas. In Barrett's intraepithelial neoplasia, p16INK4a was altered in 12 of 20 (60%) high-grade and in 4 of 20 (20%) low-grade intraepithelial neoplasms. In Barrett's mucosa without intraepithelial neoplasia p16(INK4a) was methylated in one case (7%). P14ARF was intact in Barrett's mucosa without intraepithelial neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that most Barrett's intraepithelial neoplasms contain genetic and/or epigenetic INK4a-ARF alterations. Methylation of p16INK4a appears to be the most frequent epigenetic defect in the neoplastic progression of Barrett's tumourigenesis.

Barrett's esophagus: management of high-grade dysplasia and cancer

Esophagectomy remains the treatment of choice for the appropriate patient with Barrett's adenocarcinoma invading beyond the mucosa, without evidence of distant metastasis or invasion of adjacent organs. On the other hand, therapeutic management of patients with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or mucosal adenocarcinoma should be individualized, taking into account the patient's preferences, willingness to return for frequent endoscopic biopsies, and medical fitness to undergo esophagectomy. Surgery has to be considered the best treatment for HGD or superficial carcinoma, unless contraindicated by severe comorbidities, because it has proven to be the only treatment that is successful in curing the condition and preventing recurrent HGD or the development of invasive cancer. Nonsurgical treatment by photodynamic therapy or endoscopic mucosal resection may be a less invasive and organ-sparing option for elderly, poor-risk patients but it is still to be considered an investigational therapy that should only be conducted under a clinical trial protocol. Finally, intensive endoscopic biopsy surveillance of patients with HGD is another investigational option that may allow prompt treatment of cancer if it develops. However, few data document the safety of this observational approach.

Invasive carcinoma after endoscopic ablative therapy for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus

BACKGROUND

Patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in Barrett's oesophagus carry a significant risk of developing adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) aim at the radical ablation of the dysplastic area.

METHODS

We used EMR to resect the macroscopic area of dysplastic mucosa followed by PDT to eliminate residual disease. PDT was performed after oral administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA, 40 mg/kg), using fractionated illumination 3 and 6 h later with 630 nm light at 100 J/cm(2) through an endoscopic balloon diffuser.

RESULTS

We report 2 patients who developed adenocarcinoma shortly after incomplete endoscopic ablation of Barrett's epithelium. In a 61-year-old man with HGD in 8-cm Barrett's segment, HGD persisted 3 months after treatment. The oesophagectomy specimen showed a 2.3-cm pT2N0M0 adenocarcinoma in Barrett's. In a 69-year-old woman with extensive HGD in 5-cm Barrett's, HGD persisted after 3 PDT sessions in 1 year. Adenocarcinoma occurred 6 months after treatment. The oesophagectomy showed a pT1bN0M0 adenocarcinoma and extensive multifocal HGD in Barrett's.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of EMR and PDT may be a promising option for local treatment of patients with HGD in Barrett's oesophagus, provided all dysplastic tissue can be removed. Currently it should be offered only to patients who are willing to participate in a clinical trial with an intensive endoscopic follow-up programme.

Management of pre-malignant and malignant lesions by endoscopic resection

Endoscopic resection (ER) has gained more and more importance in the treatment of early gastrointestinal neoplasia over the last few years. The choice of the different available techniques depends on the site, the macroscopic type of the tumour and the personal experience of the endoscopist. The 'suck-and-cut' technique with ligation device or cap should be favoured to normal strip biopsy in the oesophagus because of the size of the resected specimen and its technical feasibility. A recently described method of ER in the stomach is the circumferential mucosal incision with a type of needle-knife and subsequent en-bloc resection following prior injection under the lesions. ER of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus should be considered as the treatment of choice. First mid-term results of endoscopic therapy of early squamous-cell neoplasia in the oesophagus show promising results; however, long-term results are awaited. Studies with large numbers of patients in Japan proved the efficiency and safety of ER in low-risk early gastric carcinoma. Duodenal lesions and adenomas of the major duodenal papilla were also proved to be treated successfully by ER. In the colon, ER is used successfully for resection of adenomas and small well-differentiated or moderately differentiated carcinomas that are restricted to the mucosa. ER of gastrointestinal lesions is a safe and effective method but should be performed only by experienced endoscopists.

Approach to early Barrett's cancer

Because of effective surveillance programs in patients with known Barrett's esophagus, adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus is increasingly diagnosed at early stages. With the introduction of limited surgical and endoscopic treatment modalities, the need for radical esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy in such patients has been questioned. When selecting the approach to early Barrett's cancer, the precancerous nature of the underlying Barrett's esophagus, the frequent multicentricity of neoplastic alterations within the Barrett mucosa, the inaccuracy of current staging modalities, and the presence of lymph node metastases should be taken into account. Invasiveness and morbidity of the procedures, as well as quality of life aspects, should also be considered. From an oncologic point of view the minimum extent of a resection for early Barrett's cancer should include a full-thickness removal of the entire segment of the distal esophagus covered by intestinal metaplasia together with a regional lymphadenectomy. In appropriately selected patients this can be achieved by a limited surgical procedure involving transhiatal resection of the distal esophagus, but not by endoscopic mucosal ablation or endoscopic mucosa resection. Our experience with 49 limited surgical resections with regional lymphadenectomy indicates that this procedure is oncologically adequate and safe. Reconstruction with an interposed jejunal loop prevents postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and is associated with good quality of life. In contrast, endoscopic interventions are plagued by a high tumor recurrence rate, probably from persistence of Barrett's mucosa and gastroesophageal reflux.

A prospective randomized trial of two different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

A variety of different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the upper GI tract have been described that are more effective than strip biopsy. However, there is no report of a prospective randomized comparison of different techniques.

METHODS

In a prospective randomized study, 100 consecutive endoscopic resections were performed in 72 patients with early stage esophageal cancer. Fifty endoscopic resections were performed with a "suck-and-ligate" device without prior submucosa injection and 50 with the cap technique with prior submucosa injection of a dilute saline solution of epinephrine. The main assessment criteria were maximum diameter of the resection specimen and of the resection area, and the complication rate.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the two groups with regard to the maximum diameters and calculated area of the resected specimens (ligation group: 16.4 [4.0] x 11 [3.1] mm/185 [84] mm(2) vs. cap group: 15.5 [4.1] x 10.7 [2.7] mm/168 [83] mm(2)), or the maximum diameters and calculated area of the endoscopic resection ulcers after 24 hours (ligation group: 20.6 [4.8] x 14.3 [4.5] mm/314 [160] mm(2) vs. cap group: 18.9 [5.1] x 12.9 [3.8] mm/260 [145] mm(2)). There was only a slight advantage (greater diameter of resection specimens) for the ligation group in patients who had prior endoscopic treatment. There was one minor episode of bleeding in each group; there was no severe complication. In 41 of 72 patients (57%), further endoscopic therapy after endoscopic resection was necessary because of residual neoplasia at the first follow-up endoscopy after resection (61 of 100 resection specimens [61%] had lateral margins that could not be evaluated because of coagulation artifact or contained malignancy but with the base of the lesion free of tumor).

CONCLUSIONS

The cap technique with submucosa injection and the ligation technique without submucosa injection are similar with respect to efficacy and safety for endoscopic resection of early stage esophageal cancers.

Endoscopic therapeutic esophageal interventions: old, new, borrowed and . . . methylene blue?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic interventions in the esophagus continue to evolve. This article reviews some of the notable advances over the past year in endoscopic therapy for the esophagus.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2002 several endoscopic therapies were reintroduced or modified. Ablative treatments, including Nd:YAG laser, photodynamic therapy, and thermal contact treatments have been shown to be effective for Barrett esophagus and some early esophageal cancers. The addition of endoscopic mucosal resection may improve these therapies. Endoscopic stenting remains the dominant endoscopic palliative modality for unresectable esophageal cancers, and modifications of this therapy have focused on reducing side effects and complications. Innovations in endoscopic treatments for strictures and bleeding esophageal varices have been proposed and may improve outcomes, although probably only marginally. Additional endoscopic antireflux procedures have been introduced, although the results of long-term studies still need to be published before their place in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease can be determined.

SUMMARY

Rather than heralding novel endoscopic therapeutics, 2002 was a year of retooling and refining existing techniques.

Multipolar electrocoagulation

Multipolar electrocoagulation (MPEC) is a readily available technique that can be applied for endoscopic ablation of Barrett's esophagus. MPEC, in combination with high dose proton pump inhibitor therapy or antireflux surgery, results in normal squamous epithelium in most patients without major adverse effects. The ultimate clinical role of MPEC has not been determined but may be adjunctive to other techniques in appropriately selected patients at high risk for neoplastic progression.

Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic resection

In experienced hands, ER is a safe method of resecting dysplastic lesions and early carcinomas of the GI tract, and it has decisive advantages compared with other local endoscopic treatment procedures (such as thermal destruction and PDT). The opportunity for histological processing of the resected specimen provides information regarding the depth of invasion of the individual layers of the GI tract wall. Additionally, it has advantages regarding excision with healthy margins. This means that even when there is infiltration of the submucosa that has not been detected before treatment--in which case local endoscopic therapy is no longer appropriate--a patient with early Barrett's cancer still is able to undergo surgical resection. As was shown recently, the morbidity and mortality of ER are significantly dependent on the frequency with which esophagectomy is performed in each center. When there were more than 20 procedures of this type per year, the surgical mortality was 8%, whereas in centers conducting fewer than 10 procedures per year the rate was 21%. In view of the consequent claim that ER should only be performed at high-volume centers, curative endoscopic treatment of early esophageal carcinomas also should be performed only in centers with a similar frequency to that of the surgical high-volume centers. It is only in these conditions that the conclusion is defensible that patients with HGIN or mucosal Barrett's carcinoma should undergo ER with curative intent instead of radical ER. Randomized and controlled studies comparing radical esophagectomy with endoscopic therapy are desirable, but they are difficult to conduct, not least because valid 5-year survival data show no significant difference between patients who have undergone endoscopic treatment for early Barrett's cancers and the average German population of the same age and sex.

Surgery or endotherapy for high-grade dysplasia/early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus?

The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing and Barrett's oesophagus (columnar-lined oesophagus) is the main risk factor. Currently, oesophagectomy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma is the only accepted effective therapy; however, it has significant associated morbidity and mortality. Recent developments in the staging of oesophageal adenocarcinoma have allowed early adenocarcinoma/high-grade dysplasia to be identified with confidence, allowing attempts at local endoscopic treatment without the need for oesophagectomy. Hitherto, there have been no reports of long-term follow-up. Follow-up of local endoscopic therapy in 115 patients with high-grade dysplasia/early adenocarcinoma has now been presented, suggesting that local endoscopic therapy appears to be an effective and safe option for the management of these conditions.