Drug-induced pancreatitis: an update

Acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas. Acute abdominal pain is the most common symptom, and increased concentrations of serum amylase and lipase confirm the diagnosis. Pancreatic injury is mild in 80% of patients, who recover without complications. The remaining patients have a severe disease with local and systemic complications. Gallstone migration into the common bile duct and alcohol abuse are the most frequent causes of pancreatitis in adults. About 15-25% of pancreatitis episodes are of unknown origin. Treatment of mild disease is supportive, but severe episodes need management by a multidisciplinary team including gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists, intensivists, and surgeons. Improved understanding of pathophysiology and better assessments of disease severity should ameliorate the management and outcome of this complex disease.

Etiology and outcome of acute pancreatitis in infants and toddlers

OBJECTIVE

To determine the etiologic factors and outcome of acute pancreatitis in children under age 3 years.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of children under age 3 years with acute pancreatitis between January 1995 and December 2004. Stringent diagnostic criteria were used. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and etiology and outcome were recorded. The study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh's Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

Of 109 cases, 87 met the diagnostic criteria. Median age was 20 months (range, 1 week to 35 months). AP was associated with multisystem disease in 29 cases (34%), with hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) being common. Pancreatitis was associated with systemic infections in 16 cases (18%) and was idiopathic in 15 cases (17%). Biliary disease played an important etiologic role (9%), as did trauma (8%). Pancreatitis was mild in 76 cases (87.3%) and severe in 3 cases (3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

AP is commonly associated with multisystem disease, particularly with HUS. Idiopathic pancreatitis and pancreatitis associated with biliary disease are seen in children under age 3 years. Trauma is a less frequent cause of pancreatitis, and severe pancreatitis is rare in this age group.

Surgical Complications of Childhood Tumors

Most childhood tumors will first present to a physician; some tumors will present in an atypical manner and may mimic a surgical condition. The diagnosis may be missed if the surgeon is not aware of the possibility of cancer. A very great number of rare presentations of childhood cancer have been described in the literature. It is important that the surgeon who is not experienced in the management of childhood cancer is aware that an apparently benign condition could be a manifestation of an underlying malignancy [71, 83] (Table 22.1).

Ertapenem-induced acute pancreatitis in a surgical elderly patient

Case summary A 78-year old man was given, after surgery, 1 g ertapenem every 24 h intravenously. His clinical evolution was favorable and on day 8 ertapenem was discontinued and the patient was put on a semi-solid diet. On day 9, abdominal distension was seen accompanied by epigastric pain. The laboratory tests on day 8 showed an altered pancreatic profile: amylase = 1823 U/l (normal value: 0-100); lipase = 8045 U/l (normal value: 0-60); C-reactive protein (CRP) = 16.09 mg/dl (normal value: 0-0.5). Full Blood Count (FBC) showed leukocytosis with an increase in neutrophils and eosinophils. The prior pancreatic parameters were normal without leukocytosis. The evolution of clinical symptoms after discontinuing ertapenem was rapid. Between days 11 and 16, the laboratory parameters returned to normal values; the eosinophilia persisted longer, decreasing between days 14 and 16. Conclusions clinicians should include monitoring the development of acute pancreatitis in the safety parameters in patients undergoing treatment with this carbapenem.

Predicting asparaginase-associated pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis is a well-known, but little-understood complication of asparaginase. There is no predictor of who will develop asparaginase-associated pancreatitis (AAP). To better define this population, we present a retrospective analysis regarding AAP and provide a review of the relevant literature.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed medical records of 254 asparaginase recipients during a 5-year period. Pancreatitis was defined and graded according to CTCAE v3.0.

RESULTS

Pancreatitis was diagnosed in 48 (19%) patients. Thirty-three (13%) patients were identified as having AAP. Twelve cases occurred after Escherichia coli asparaginase and 20 followed PEG-asparaginase. Pancreatitis was independent of the individual or cumulative asparaginase dose. The interval to pancreatitis diagnosis was longer for PEG-asparaginase than E. coli asparaginase (P = 0.02). AAP was seen more frequently in patients receiving prednisone (P = 0.02) and daunomycin (P = 0.006) while less frequent with dexamethasone (P = 0.04). Other chemotherapy agents appeared to have no association with AAP. As observed by others, those with pancreatitis were older (P = 0.001), but the significance of this remains uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes our inability to predict who will develop pancreatic toxicity from asparaginase and suggests that those at risk might have an unidentified genetic predisposition.

Acute pancreatitis as a possible consequence of metronidazole during a relapse of ulcerative colitis

We present the first case of metronidazole-related acute pancreatitis during a relapse of ulcerative colitis. A 31-year-old male patient, with inflammatory bowel disease on mesalamine treatment for the last 5 months, suffered from a 48-h abdominal pain and nausea. He was also administered metronidazole during a relapse 5 days before. Laboratory and imaging investigation revealed acute pancreatitis. Conservative measures and metronidazole as well as mesalamine withdrawal resulted in complete recovery. Clinical remission of ulcerative colitis was obtained by prednisolone administration. Mesalamine was reintroduced and no recurrence was noticed for a year. Acute pancreatitis was mainly attributed to metronidazole owing to the absence of recurrence after mesalamine readministration, the time of onset after the initiation of metronidazole and the lower typical range between its onset and mesalamine exposure. Identifying acute pancreatitis as a possible consequence of a certain medication in inflammatory bowel disease patients may be particularly important to determine further treatment of their disease.

Acute Pancreatitis in a Patient Treated with Micafungin

CASE SUMMARY

A 73-year-old man (height, 158.2 cm; weight, 49.8 kg) presented with upper abdominal tenderness after 3 weeks of treatment with 150 mg/d of micafungin (3 mg/kg . d) (Mycamine, Astellas Pharma US Inc., Deerfield, Illinois) intravenously for pulmonary aspergillosis accompanied by [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection. Pulmonary aspergillosis was noninvasively diagnosed by a fungus lump in a cavity in the right upper lung field with a high value of 1,3-beta-D-glucan and a positive result for aspergillosis antigen. The patient had a medical history of gastrectomy due to gastric cancer and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). He had been prescribed 800 mg/d of clarithromycin, 400 mg/dL of rifampicin, and 750 mg/d of ethambutol hydrochloride for pulmonary MAC infection for 2 years and 5 mg/d of prednisolone for ITP for 7 years. No traditional or homeopathic medicine had been received/administered. Laboratory tests at the onset of abdominal pain revealed a white blood cell count of 4300/microL with 51% neutrophils. There was no eosinophilia. Platelet count was 15,100/muL, with normal coagulation. Immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M were 1720 and 154 mg/dL, respectively. The patient had no history of allergy, biliary tract disease, hyperlipidemia, or hypercalcemia. He did not report alcohol use. The laboratory findings, magnetic resonance imaging, and upper abdominal tenderness were consistent with acute pancreatitis. After cessation of all drugs, his symptoms improved with bowel rest and parenteral nutrition. His laboratory measurements normalized thereafter. All drugs, except micafungin, were readministered for pulmonary MAC infection and ITP, and itraconazole was administered for pulmonary aspergillosis after the recovery from pancreatitis. During 16 months of follow-up, the pancreatitis did not recur.

DISCUSSION

We performed a literature search of all available English-language articles published on MEDLINE between January 1966 and January 2007 using the key terms micafungin (text and indexed terms) and pancreatitis (text and indexed terms). Based on the search of MEDLINE, there have been no reports of acute pancreatitis associated with micafungin. The Naranjo adverse drug reaction (ADR) probability scale was used to assess the probability of micafungin-associated acute pancreatitis. A score of 6 was obtained, indicating a probable ADR from micafungin treatment.

CONCLUSION

We report a case of acute pancreatitis probably associated with micafungin use in an elderly patient.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: an evidence-based review

The diagnosis of drug-induced acute pancreatitis often is difficult to establish. Although some medications have been shown to cause acute pancreatitis with a large body of evidence, including rechallenge, some medications have been attributed as a cause of acute pancreatitis merely by a single published case report in which the investigators found no other cause. In addition, some medications reported to have caused acute pancreatitis have obvious patterns of presentation, including the time from initiation to the development of disease (latency). There also appear to be patterns in the severity of disease. After reviewing the literature, we have classified drugs that have been reported to cause acute pancreatitis based on the published weight of evidence for each agent and the pattern of clinical presentation. Based on our analysis of the level of evidence, 4 classes of drugs could be identified. Class I drugs include medications in which at least 1 case report described a recurrence of acute pancreatitis with a rechallenge with the drug. Class II drugs include drugs in which there is a consistent latency in 75% or more of the reported cases. Class III drugs include drugs that had 2 or more case reports published, but neither a rechallenge nor a consistent latency period. Class IV drugs were similar to class III drugs, but only 1 case report had been published. Our analysis allows an evidence-based approach when suspecting a drug as causing acute pancreatitis.

The patient with slightly elevated pancreatic enzymes and abdominal complaints

Abdominal complaints in combination with slightly elevated serum pancreatic enzymes represent a classical clinical challenge. These symptoms may be due to coincidental unrelated harmless disorders, benign pancreatic alterations which are fairly easily treatable such as mild acute pancreatitis or uncomplicated chronic pancreatitis. However, serious, often insidious diseases such as pancreatic tumours may also present with this constellation as their first signs. Diagnostic procedures need to be stratified according to acuteness and severity of symptoms. While patients with acute onset of symptoms and severe complaints need immediate and combined laboratory and imaging investigations to allow adequate therapy, chronic and mild complaints usually justify a stepwise diagnostic approach consecutively using abdominal ultrasound, CT/MRI and endoscopic ultrasound as imaging procedures and reserving ERCP for cases which remain unclear or in which interventional therapy is needed. Diagnosis and follow-up are often particularly demanding in patients with cystic tumours of the pancreas. In chronic pancreatitis patients pain therapy and adequate control of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency may pose major problems. Patients with refractory pain may ultimately require surgical intervention. Another important indication for surgery in chronic pancreatitis is suspicion of cancer that cannot be ruled out by dedicated diagnostic procedures. This also applies to cystic tumours of the pancreas, which have a high risk of malignant transformation or may even already represent pancreatic cancer at the time of diagnosis.

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and risk of acute pancreatitis: a population-based case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether acute pancreatitis is associated with the use of postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy in Danish women over 45 yr of age.

METHODS

We based this population-based case-control study on data from three Danish counties for the years 1991-2003. We identified all women (>45 yr of age) with a first hospital discharge diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in the county hospital discharge registries (N = 1,054). Using the Danish Civil Registration System, we selected 10 age-matched population controls for each case, using risk set sampling (N = 10,540). Data on all prescriptions for estrogens or combined estrogen/progestins redeemed within 90 days before the hospitalization (current users) and 91-365 days before (former users) were collected from the prescription databases. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risk of acute pancreatitis after exposure to estrogen or combined estrogen/progestin, adjusted for other risk factors for acute pancreatitis.

RESULTS

The adjusted relative risk for acute pancreatitis in current users of menopausal estrogens was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-1.4), and 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.5) in former users. For current users of combined estrogen/progestins, the adjusted relative risk was 1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.6), and for former users, 1.6 (95% CI 1.0-2.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data did not support a substantial association between acute pancreatitis and the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy.

A case of fatal necrotizing pancreatitis: complication of hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy

We report a case of fatal necrotizing pancreatitis associated with hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy. A 49-year-old man who presented with 2 days of abdominal pain and vomiting was found to have severe pancreatitis. The patient denied any alcohol use. In addition, abdominal ultrasound examinations showed no evidence of cholelithiasis or bile duct dilations. Review of his medication history with the family revealed that he was being treated with hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril for hypertension. An exploratory laparotomy was performed and revealed no common bile duct stones. Unfortunately, the patient's hospital course was complicated with multiple organ failure, which resulted in death. To the best of our knowledge, there are only 3 other reported cases of hydrochlorothiazide-induced necrotizing pancreatitis reported in the literature.

Factors influencing mortality in acute pancreatitis: can we alter them?

Severe acture pancreatitis (SAP), a multisystem disease, is characterized by multiple organ system failure and additionally by local pancreatic complications such as necrosis, abscess, or pseudocyst. The rate of mortality in SAP, which is about 20% of all cases of acute pancreatitis (AP), may be as high as 25%, as in infected pancreatic necrosis. The factors that influence mortality in different degrees are various. Etiology for the episode, age, sex, race, ethnicity, genetic makeup, severity on admission, and the extent and nature of pancreatic necrosis (sterile vs. infected) influence the mortality. Other factors include treatment modalities such as administration of prophylactic antibiotics, the mode of feeding (TPN vs. enteral), ERCP with sphincterotomy, and surgery in selected cases. Epidemiological studies indicate that the incidence of AP is increasing along with an increase in obesity, a bad prognostic factor. Many studies have indicated a worse prognosis in idiopathic AP compared to pancreatitis induced by alcoholism or biliary stone. The risk for SAP after ERCP is the subject of extensive study. AP after trauma, organ transplant, or coronary artery bypass surgery is rare but may be serious. Since Ranson reported early prognostic criteria, a number of attempts have been made to simplify or add new clinical or laboratory studies in the early assessment of severity. Obesity, hemoconcentration on admission, presence of pleural effusion, increased fasting blood sugar, as well as creatinine, elevated CRP in serum, and urinary trypsinogen levels are some of the well-documented factors in the literature. The role of appropriate prophylactic antibiotic therapy although still is highly controversial, in properly chosen cases appears to be beneficial and well accepted in clinical practice. Early enteral nutrition has gained much support and jejunal feeding bypassing the pancreatic stimulatory effect of it in the duodenum is desirable in selected cases. The limited role for endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with demonstrated dilated CBD with impacted stone and evidence of impending cholangitis is well documented. Surgery in AP other than for removal of the gallbladder is often limited to infected pancreatic necrosis, pseudocysts, and pancreatic abscess and in some cases of traumatic pancreatitis with a ruptured duct system. The progress in the understanding of the role of cytokines will over us opportunities to use immunomodulatory therapies to improve the outcome in SAP.