Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: application of the Delphic consensus process to the development of a minimum pathology data set

[What's new? The 2010 WHO classification for tumours of the pancreas]

The new WHO classification of tumours of the pancreas logically includes both exocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms in one volume, thus differing from all previous editions. Ductal adenocarcinoma is still the most frequent and clinically the most relevant malignant tumour. Its subtypes and variants are described in detail, as are mixed tumours. Other ductal tumours [mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPNM)] are classified as neoplasms with various grades of dysplasia up to invasive carcinoma. A new subtype of IPNM, intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN), has been characterized and newly added to the IPMN group. Serous and acinar tumours are classified as neoplasms with varying grades of dysplasia. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is regarded as malignant (low grade) as a matter of principle because of its inherent potential to metastasize. Neuroendocrine neoplasms are characterized as G1 or G2 neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC, highly malignant). Syndromatic NETs are described and named according to their hormone expression pattern. The problems of staging when applying either the TNM or AJCC/UICC (American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer) classifications, which apply equally to endocrine and exocrine tumors, are discussed.

Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinomas (MANECs) of the Gastrointestinal Tract: An Update

The systematic application of immunohistochemical techniques to the study of tumors has led to the recognition that neuroendocrine cells occur rather frequently in exocrine neoplasms of the gut. It is now well known that there is a wide spectrum of combinations of exocrine and neuroendocrine components, ranging from adenomas or carcinomas with interspersed neuroendocrine cells at one extreme to classical neuroendocrine tumors with a focal exocrine component at the other. In addition, both exocrine and neuroendocrine components can have different morphological features ranging, for the former, from adenomas to adenocarcinomas with different degrees of differentiation and, for the latter, from well differentiated to poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. However, although this range of combinations of neuroendocrine and exocrine components is frequently observed in routine practice, mixed exocrine-neuroendocrine carcinomas, now renamed as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs), are rare; these are, by definition, neoplasms in which each component represents at least 30% of the lesion. Gastrointestinal MANECs can be stratified in different prognostic categories according to the grade of malignancy of each component. The present paper is an overview of the main clinicopathological, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of this specific rare tumor type.

A renaissance in therapeutic options for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The field of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has seen a remarkable renaissance in recent years with exponential increases in published research, clinical trials, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments. Surgical resection remains the foundation for management of locoregional disease. However, for patients with advanced disease, novel therapeutic options have emerged. Two separate randomized placebo-controlled studies have shown prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with everolimus or sunitinib. Future studies are designed to answer questions about the role of somatostatin analogs as antiproliferative agents, combinations of biologic therapies, and new cytotoxic chemotherapy backbones.

Monoclonal antibodies against the human somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5: development and immunohistochemical application in neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Activation of somatostatin receptors (sstr1-5) by somatostatin and its analogues exerts an inhibitory effect on hormone secretion and provides the basis for the treatment of a range of endocrine diseases such as acromegaly, Cushing's disease and neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The lack of well-characterized commercially available sstr subtype-specific antibodies prevents routine identification of the sstr expression profile in patients.

METHODS

We generated and characterized new mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the five human sstr subtypes using ELISA and immunohistochemistry, and tested their suitability in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human tissues and archival samples of normal pancreatic tissue and NET.

RESULTS

All mAbs were highly specific with no cross-reactivity. The sstr1-5 immunoreactivity in gastrointestinal NET (n=67) was correlated with clinicopathologic data. With the exception of sstr3, NET were highly positive for all receptor subtypes (42, 63, 6, 32 and 65% of tumors were positive for sstr1, sstr2a, sstr3, sstr4 and sstr5, respectively). sstr1, sstr2a and sstr5 were present at the plasma membrane and in the cytoplasm of tumor cells, whereas sstr3 and sstr4 were almost exclusively cytoplasmic. Immunoreactivity of sstr1, sstr2a and sstr4 tended to decrease as tumor aggressiveness increased. sstr5 showed an opposite pattern, with higher staining in well-differentiated carcinomas compared with well-differentiated tumors. sstr5 immunoreactivity was correlated with the presence of metastases and angioinvasion, suggesting a possible association with more aggressive behavior.

CONCLUSION

Determination of the sstr1-5 by immunohistochemistry using subtype-specific mAbs is feasible in FFPE tissue and may provide a tool for routine clinical practice.

Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of well-differentiated gastroenterohepatic neuroendocrine tumours: a revised statement from a Canadian National Expert Group

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (nets-previously called "carcinoid tumours") are relatively rare tumours originating from the diffuse neuroendocrine system; they are found most often in the bronchial or gastrointestinal systems. In Canada, gastroenterohepatic NETS represent less than 0.25% of oncology cases. Because of the relative rarity of these tumours, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches vary and are often based on individual physician experience. A number of European and North American groups have developed consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of well-differentiated gastroenterohepatic NETS, and in 2006, Canadian consensus guidelines were published by a Canadian expert group. The updated and expanded current Canadian guidelines are based on a consensus meeting held in Paris, France, in 2008 and are based on the most current literature.

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in pancreatic endocrine tumors correlated with histopathologic characteristics

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of different subtypes of pancreatic endocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system and analyze the potentially responsible histopathologic characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 18 patients with surgical pathology-proven pancreatic endocrine tumors were evaluated. Tumors were subcategorized based on the WHO grading classification into well-differentiated tumors with benign and uncertain behavior and endocrine carcinomas with well and poor differentiation. ADCs were measured on diffusion-weighted (DW) images and compared using Student's t-test and one-way analysis of variance. The correlation between ADCs, tumor cellularity, Ki-67 labeling index (an index of cell growth), and extracellular fibrosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

A difference was demonstrated in mean ADCs between well-differentiated endocrine tumors (1.75 ± 0.53) and endocrine carcinomas (1.00 ± 0.19 × 10(-3) mm(2) /sec) (P < 0.01). After excluding the three well-differentiated endocrine tumors with benign behavior and marked fibrosis, a significant inverse correlation between ADC values and cellularity of endocrine tumors was observed. An inverse correlation was seen between Ki-67 labeling index and ADC values (r = -0.70; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Tumor cellularity and/or extracellular fibrosis may account for various ADCs in pancreatic endocrine tumors. ADC correlates well with the Ki-67 labeling index and may help predict growth of endocrine tumors.

Multivisceral resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a report of two cases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) are rare and surgical resection offers the only possibility of cure for localised disease. The role of surgery in the setting of locally advanced and metastatic disease is more controversial. Emerging data suggests that synchronous surgical resection of pancreas and liver may be associated with increased survival. We report two cases of synchronous, one stage multivisceral resections for pNET and associated reconstruction. We highlight the technical issues involved in such extensive resections and demonstrate that one stage multivisceral operations can be achieved safely.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gut and pancreas: new insights

Neuroendocrine neoplasms arise in almost every organ of the body and are variably defined according to the site of origin. This Review focuses on neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive tract and pancreas. The 2010 WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system introduces grading and staging tools for neuroendocrine neoplasms. A carcinoid is now defined as a grade 1 or 2 neuroendocrine tumor and grade 3, small-cell or large-cell carcinomas are defined as neuroendocrine carcinoma. Epidemiological data show a worldwide increase in the prevalence and incidence of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the past few decades, which is probably due to improved methods of detection of these tumors. The current diagnostic procedures and treatment options for neuroendocrine neoplasms are defined and summarized in the Review, although evidence-based data are lacking. Surgery remains the treatment mainstay and somatostatin analogues the basis for both diagnosis and therapy as the only 'theranostic' tool. Emerging compounds including chemotherapeutic agents, small molecules and biological therapies may provide new hope for patients.

Evolving diagnostic and treatment strategies for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) have diverse clinical presentations. Patients with symptoms of hormone secretion may require specific medical interventions to control those symptoms prior to antitumor intervention. In some patients, tumors in the pancreas may be occult and specialized diagnostic imaging or surgery may be required for diagnosis. Other patients may present with more advanced disease, presenting with symptoms of tumor bulk rather than hormone secretion. Treatment options for patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors include surgical resection and hepatic directed therapies, including partial hepatectomy, hepatic artery embolization, or other ablative techniques. Streptozocin or temozolomide-based chemotherapy regimens are active against pancreatic NET, and can also play an important role in the palliation of patients with advanced disease. A number of biologically targeted agents targeting the VEGF and mTOR signaling pathways have recently shown promise, with recent trials showing treatment with the VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib or the mTOR inhibitor everolimus improves progression-free survival in patients with advanced NET.

Conundrums and Caveats in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NETs) are the second most common epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas after ductal adenocarcinoma. They can be clinically defined as functional, nonfunctional, and hereditary. This review addresses typical and atypical pathologic features of Pan-NETs, with a focus on practical issues involved in differential diagnosis, immunohistochemical work-up, intraoperative frozen section interpretation, sources of diagnostic errors, and classification. The diagnosis of a Pan-NET requires analysis of all available clinical and radiographic information and pathologic characteristics of the tumor, and it is crucial to understand the clinical impact of the pathologic interpretation.

Small intestinal neuroendocrine cell pathobiology: 'carcinoid' tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuroendocrine tumors, particularly small intestinal tumors, also grouped as 'carcinoids', are defined by an increasing incidence and prevalence, a poor response to current therapies, and confusion regarding appropriate models for drug development. Despite these issues, approximately 350 studies were published in the last year.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two sources of confusion are clearly apparent. First, pharmacotherapeutic studies using pancreatic tumor cell lines as models for small intestinal or 'carcinoid' tumor biology are considered appropriate. Second, there is continued inclusion and analysis of pancreatic endocrine tumors with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors in clinical studies. One highlight of this year is additional data confirming the significant differences between pancreatic tumor cell lines and small intestinal cell lines, the different gene expressions, for example, PAX8, between these two tumor types, and the observations that these two tumors respond differently in clinical trials, for example, to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Other highlights include delineating the role of the tumor microenvironment in the development of fibrosis and developing a minimum pathology dataset and a prognostic nomogram that may have utility in stratifying patients for clinical studies.

SUMMARY

A number of interesting studies have been published during 2009-2010, but critical areas remain that require resolution. Current data, for the most part, reflect amplification of previously held concepts with modest advances in novel information.

Histologic characterization and improved prognostic evaluation of 209 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms differ considerably in histology, clinicopathologic background, stage, and patient outcome, implying a wide spectrum of therapeutic options, hence the need for improved diagnostic and prognostic criteria to select appropriate therapy. Here, we tested the European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society and the novel World Health Organization 2010 grade and stage classifications together with additional clinicopathologic and histologic parameters in a series of 209 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms with a median follow-up of 89 months. Fifty-one grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas and 15 mixed endocrine-exocrine carcinomas of poor outcome were separated from 143 neuroendocrine tumors, including 132 G1 or G2 enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell neoplasms and 11 G1 gastrin-cell, somatostatin-cell, or serotonin-cell tumors. Most G1 cases had excellent prognosis, even when metastatic, whereas G2 and G3 neoplasms had worse or very severe prognosis, respectively. The European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society-World Health Organization 2010 proliferative grading system well correlated with patient survival. Structural histologic parameters were equally predictive and when combined with the European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society-World Health Organization 2010 grading system in a "global grade" improved tumor prognostic stratification. The European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society-World Health Organization 2010 staging system proved effective. Introduction of novel T (T(1a) and T(1b) or deep submucosal) and N categories (N(1), <3 nodes metastases; N(2), ≥3) allowed a simplified, equally informative 3-stage TNM system. Such improved diagnostic and prognostic criteria for gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms are proposed and discussed.

The archaic distinction between functioning and nonfunctioning neuroendocrine neoplasms is no longer clinically relevant

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are increasing in incidence and prevalence. This reflects greater clinical awareness, effective imaging, and increasing pathological diagnostic recognition. Although the identification and treatment of clinical neuroendocrine syndromes are established, there is confusion when a NEN has no discernible clinical symptoms.

DISCUSSION

Nonfunctional tumors are usually diagnosed incidentally and at a later stage largely because either they do not secrete a bioactive product or do so, but in a form that is either inactive or in quantities that have no discernible effect. Nevertheless, the histopathology is indistinguishable from functional NENs, and tumors exhibit somatostatin receptor expression, and positive immunohistochemistry for neuroendocrine cell markers (CgA, NSE/synaptophysin). Similarly, their rates of growth and metastatic behavior are, like other NENs, predictably based on staging and grading (mitotic rate and Ki67 expression). Both types are diagnosed biochemically (CgA) and by imaging in an identical fashion with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and endoscopic ultrasound. NENs, irrespective of function or bioactive secretory profile, respond with equal efficacy to the same regimen of surgery or antitumor drugs (e.g., somatostatin analogs with or without tyrosine kinase inhibitors/antiangiogenics or cytotoxics) depending on grade. Given the efficacy of somatostatin analogs in increasing progression free survival, nonfunctional NENs should be managed identically to symptomatic NENs. The consideration of NENs as functional or nonfunctional is an archaic clinical concept that should be discarded since the tumors are indistinguishable at a cellular, biological, and morphological level. All current evidences indicate that their diagnosis and treatment should follow the same common principles.

[The new WHO classification of digestive neuroendocrine tumors]

A new classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms has been formulated in the 2010 revision of the WHO classification of digestive tumors. The principles of this new classification are different from those used in the previous one and the terminology is quite novel. Five main categories are recognized: neuroendocrine tumor G1; neuroendocrine tumor G2; neuroendocrine carcinoma, small cell type; neuroendocrine carcinoma, large cell type; mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (a new term for mixed tumors). This new classification will change the habits of the clinicians, familiar with the previous classification, which formed the basis for deciding the therapeutic strategy and the type of patient management. Attention must be paid when establishing the concordance between the new classification and the previous one and when reclassifying a previously diagnosed case, now under follow-up. Recommendations are proposed for the redaction of the pathological reports in this period of transition.

Neuroendocrine tumors in children and young adults: rare or not so rare

This review focuses on neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) that arise in the diffuse neuroendocrine system; these rare tumors can develop in any organ that has dispersed single endocrine cells, for example, the intestine, or in an organ that has clusters of endocrine cells, for example, pancreatic islets. Previously considered benign, NETs are now recognized to recur locally or metastasize to liver and bone if not completely excised early in their course of development. This article summarizes the epidemiology and reviews the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of NETs in children and youth, noting especially those NETs that are more prevalent in young people than in older adults.

The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

In this article, updated analyses of the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry (1973-2007) are presented and compared with epidemiologic GEP-NET data from Europe and Asia. Several studies have demonstrated a steadily increasing incidence of GEP-NETs, and this escalation is still ongoing (SEER data 2004-2007). The common primary GEP-NET sites exhibit unique epidemiologic profiles with distinct patterns of incidence, age at diagnosis, stage, and survival. Overall, GEP-NET survival has improved over the past 3 decades, although the outcome for poorly differentiated tumors remains dismal.

Recent progress in the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are relatively rare tumors that arise from the diffuse neuroendocrine system. This heterogeneous group of tumors was often considered a single entity. This belied their biological diversity, and the biggest advance in understanding these tumors over the past decades has been in understanding this diversity. Diagnosis of these tumors has been aided by advances in pathological diagnosis and classification and tumor imaging with endoscopic ultrasound and somatostatin receptor fusion imaging. Genetic and molecular advances have identified molecular targets in the treatment of these tumors. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, amply supported by interventional radiological techniques, including embolization. Treatment of metastatic disease has improved significantly with the addition of several new agents, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and yttrium-90-DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) and lutetium-177-DOTA octreotate. Despite significant advances in the understanding and management of GEP-NETs, the survival of patients remains largely unchanged and there remains a need for the development of national and international research collaborations to spearhead future efforts.

The pathological diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors: common questions and tentative answers

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) develop in many organs, and although they share some pathological and clinical features, significant differences do exist among different tumor types and locations. The correct classification of NENs is based on the recently published WHO classification according to the various locations, and is relevant for the appropriate treatment in each group. The apparently easy diagnostic categorization in well-differentiated NENs, called neuroendocrine tumors, and poorly differentiated NENs, called neuroendocrine carcinomas, is complicated by the existence, among others, of different terminologies, morphological criteria of malignancy, combined exocrine-endocrine tumors, as well as of heterogeneous diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers. The present paper is an overview of the most frequently asked questions and an attempt to provide practical answers related to NEN diagnosis in the daily pathology work.

Neuroendocrine tumors of midgut and hindgut origin: tumor-node-metastasis classification determines clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Prognostic classification of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients is difficult due to the complexity of current classification systems. A recent proposal for a tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification and a grading system based on the proliferative fraction proved valid in NETs of foregut origin. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of a proposal for TNM staging and grading for midgut and hindgut NETs.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy patients with histologically proven midgut and hindgut NETs were investigated. Epidemiological, clinicopathological, and tumor-specific data at initial diagnosis were recorded. Tumors were classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the recent European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society-TNM staging and grading proposal. Survival analysis and statistical testing for independent prognostic factors were performed using log-rank tests and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of 270 NETs originating in the midgut or hindgut, 7% (5-year survival rate [YSR], 100%) were stage 1, 8% (5-YSR, 100%) were stage 2, 19% (5-YSR, 89.5%) were stage 3, and 66% (5-YSR, 83.3%) were stage 4 NETs; 62% (5-YSR 95.2%) were grade 1, 32% (5-YSR 82.0%) were grade 2, and 6% (5-YSR, 51.4%) were grade 3 NETs. WHO classification significantly separated poorly from well-differentiated NET or carcinomas but did not further discriminate. TNM staging significantly separated stages 1, 2, and 3 from stage 4 NETs, as did grading according to proliferative capacity for all grades. Multivariate analysis confirmed these results, particularly for Ki67 grading.

CONCLUSIONS

The acquired data confirmed the prognostic relevance of the proposed TNM staging and grading system and demonstrated the applicability of these classification tools. The TNM system can therefore facilitate therapeutic stratification and comparison of data from different institutions.

Paraneoplastic antigen Ma2 autoantibodies as specific blood biomarkers for detection of early recurrence of small intestine neuroendocrine tumors

Background

Small intestine neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) belong to a rare group of cancers. Most patients have developed metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, for which there is currently no cure. The delay in diagnosis is a major issue in the clinical management of the patients and new markers are urgently needed. We have previously identified paraneoplastic antigen Ma2 (PNMA2) as a novel SI-NET tissue biomarker. Therefore, we evaluated whether Ma2 autoantibodies detection in the blood stream is useful for the clinical diagnosis and recurrence of SI-NETs.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A novel indirect ELISA was set up to detect Ma2 autoantibodies in blood samples of patients with SI-NET at different stages of disease. The analysis was extended to include typical and atypical lung carcinoids (TLC and ALC), to evaluate whether Ma2 autoantibodies in the blood stream become a general biomarker for NETs. In total, 124 blood samples of SI-NET patients at different stages of disease were included in the study. The novel Ma2 autoantibody ELISA showed high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy with ROC curve analysis underlying an area between 0.734 and 0.816. Ma2 autoantibodies in the blood from SI-NET patients were verified by western blot and sequential immunoprecipitation. Serum antibodies of patients stain Ma2 in the tumor tissue and neurons. We observed that SI-NET patients expressing Ma2 autoantibody levels below the cutoff had a longer progression and recurrence-free survival compared to those with higher titer. We also detected higher levels of Ma2 autoantibodies in blood samples from TLC and ALC patients than from healthy controls, as previously shown in small cell lung carcinoma samples.

Conclusion

Here we show that high Ma2 autoantibody titer in the blood of SI-NET patients is a sensitive and specific biomarker, superior to chromogranin A (CgA) for the risk of recurrence after radical operation of these tumors.

Epithelial neoplasms of the appendix

CONTEXT

The appendix gives rise to an array of epithelial neoplasms showing glandular or neuroendocrine differentiation, and some tumors with elements of both cell types. Although some appendiceal neoplasms resemble their counterparts in the small and large intestines (conventional adenocarcinoma and carcinoid tumor), the appendix also gives rise to relatively unique entities including mucinous neoplasms and goblet cell carcinoid tumors, which present a challenge in pathologic classification and clinical management.

OBJECTIVE

To review clinical and diagnostic issues for 3 pathologic types of epithelial neoplasms of the appendix: (1) adenocarcinoma, with specific focus on mucinous neoplasm; (2) goblet cell carcinoid tumor and associated adenocarcinoma; and (3) typical carcinoid tumor.

DATA SOURCES

Case-derived material and literature review.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important issue in pathologic assessment of epithelial tumors of the appendix is to understand the clinical implications inherent in the diagnosis.

New pharmacologic therapies for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Successful treatment of unresectable and metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) requires the thoughtful choice of systemic therapy as a component of a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach. The role of somatostatin analogues is established in symptom relief, but the efficacy of interferon and radiopeptide targeted therapy is not clear. The utility of a variety of tyrosine kinase and antiangiogenic agents is variable and under investigation, whereas the role of cytotoxic chemotherapy in poorly differentiated GEP-NETs is accepted. Overall, the ideal treatment of more indolent tumors is less certain. Reassessments of the GEP-NET pathology classification has provided improved logic for the role of a variety of agents, whereas the precise positioning of many new agents that target molecular pathways of angiogenesis and proliferation is under examination. This article describes the current options for systemic therapy for GEP-NETs within the framework of the current World Health Organization classification system.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumours: current diagnosis and management

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are increasing in both incidence and prevalence and, as a group, are more prevalent than either gastric, pancreatic, oesophageal or hepatobiliary adenocarcinomas, or any two of these cancers combined. Clinical awareness of the protean and intermittent symptoms of NETs (eg, sweating, flushing, diarrhoea, and bronchospasm) is critical for timely diagnosis; however, the classical carcinoid syndrome is relatively uncommon. The most useful diagnostic test for gastrointestinal NETs is measurement of plasma chromogranin A (CgA) levels. Disease extent is assessed by both anatomical imaging, and nuclear imaging with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues. Pathological evaluation comprises tumour-node-metastasis classification, a minimum pathological dataset, CgA and synaptophysin immunostaining, as well as mitotic count or Ki-67 index (a marker of cell proliferation) to define grading. Resection of the primary lesion and as much metastatic disease as possible increases the efficacy of medical therapy. Other management strategies include hepatic embolisation and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Patients with tumours expressing somatostatin receptors should be treated with somatostatin analogues. Depending on the tumour grade, other effective agents include cytotoxics, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antiangiogenics. The overarching requirement for best management of patients with NETs is to ensure that they have ready access to experienced multidisciplinary clinician groups located within centres of appropriate subspecialty expertise.

The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise in most organs of the body and share many common pathologic features. However, a variety of different organ-specific systems have been developed for nomenclature, grading, and staging of NETs, causing much confusion. This review examines issues in the pathologic assessment of NETs that are common among primaries of different sites. The various systems of nomenclature are compared along with new proposal for grading and staging NETs. Although differences persist, there are many common themes, such as the distinction of well-differentiated (low and intermediate-grade) from poorly differentiated (high-grade) NETs and the significance of proliferative rate in prognostic assessment. A recently published minimum pathology data set is presented to help standardize the information in pathology reports. Although an ultimate goal of standardizing the pathologic classification of all NETs, irrespective of primary site, remains elusive, an understanding of the common themes among the different current systems will permit easier translation of information relevant to prognosis and treatment.

NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the stomach and pancreas represent 2 major subtypes of gastrointestinal NETs. Historically, there has been little consensus on the classification and management of patients with these tumor subtypes. We provide an overview of well-differentiated NETs of the stomach and pancreas and describe consensus guidelines for the treatment of patients with these malignancies.

Chromogranin A--biological function and clinical utility in neuro endocrine tumor disease

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a form of cancer that differ from other neoplasia in that they synthesize, store, and secrete peptides, e.g., chromogranin A (CgA) and amines. A critical issue is late diagnosis due to failure to identify symptoms or to establish the biochemical diagnosis. We review here the utility of CgA measurement in NETs and describe its biological role and the clinical value of its measurement.

METHODS

Literature review and analysis of the utility of plasma/serum CgA measurements in NETs and other diseases.

RESULTS

CgA is a member of the chromogranin family; its transcription and peptide processing are well characterized, but its precise function remains unknown. Levels are detectable in the circulation but vary substantially (approximately 25%) depending on which assay is used. Serum and plasma measurements are concordant. CgA is elevated in approximately 90% of gut NETs and correlates with tumor burden and recurrence. Highest values are noted in ileal NETs and gastrointestinal NETs associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Both functioning and nonfunctioning pancreatic NETs have elevated values. CgA is more frequently elevated in well-differentiated tumors compared to poorly differentiated NETs. Effective treatment is often associated with decrease in CgA levels. Proton pump inhibitors falsely increase CgA, but levels normalize with therapy cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

CgA is currently the best available biomarker for the diagnosis of NETs. It is critical to establish diagnosis and has some utility in predicting disease recurrence, outcome, and efficacy of therapy. Measurement of plasma CgA is mandatory for the effective diagnosis and management of NET disease.