Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and reduces the need for axillary dissection in breast cancer patients

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes at initial diagnosis

AIM

To evaluate the utility of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes at initial diagnosis treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was performed from January 2008 to December 2012 in 52 women, mean age 50.7 years, with infiltrating breast carcinoma T1-3, N1, M0 (1 bilateral, 7 multifocal) treated with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, docetaxel and trastuzumab in Her2/neu-positive patients. Axillary evaluation included physical examination, axillary ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of any suspicious lymph node. The day before surgery, 74-111 MBq of (99m)Tc-albumin nanocolloid was injected periareolarly. All patients underwent breast surgery, with SLNB and complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The SLNs were examined by frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin staining, immunohistochemical analysis or one-step nucleic acid amplification assay (OSNA).

RESULTS

Mean tumor size: 3.5 cm. Histologic type: 81.1% invasive ductal carcinoma. Complete response of primary tumor was clinical 43.4%, pathological 41.5%. All patients were clinically node-negative after NAC. Pathological complete response of axillary node was 42.2%. SLN identification rate was 84.9%. Axilla was positive in the pathology study in 6 of 8 patients without nanocolloid migration. SLN accurately represented the axillary status in 95.5%. False negative rate was 8.3%. SLN was the only positive node in 68.2% of patients. Mean number of SLN removed was 1.9 and of nodes resected from the ALND 13.2.

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy after NAC is a feasible and accurate tool in patients with operable breast cancer T1-3, N1 and clinically node-negative after therapy.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cytologically proven node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis

BACKGROUND

The performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) was investigated in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

METHODS

After NCT of 178 patients with cytology-proven axillary/supraclavicular nodes metastasis at the time of diagnosis, SLNB using radioisotope was performed including completion node dissection between 2008 and 2011. The detection rate, sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of SLNB were analyzed.

RESULTS

SLNB was successfully performed in 169 (94.9%) patients. Tumor nonresponse and extensive residual nodal disease were found to be significantly associated with detection failure of sentinel nodes. Sensitivity, FNR, NPV, and accuracy of SLNB were 78.0, 22.0, 75.8, and 87.0%, respectively, and a greater number of retrieved SLNs increased all four of these performance measures. Conversion to node-negative disease was achieved in 69 (40.8%) patients: 24% of patients with the luminal A subtype, 51.6% of patients with the luminal B, 51.7% of patients with the HER2-enriched, and 58.5% of patients with the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Luminal B, HER2-enriched, and TNBC subtypes showed comparable responses to NCT; however, the TNBC subtype had a significantly better FNR and accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB was found to be technically feasible, but its routine use was not recommended for LABCs after NCT. However, acceptable performance was noted for locally advanced TNBCs, and thus SLNB might be safely considered in these selected patients.

Timing of the sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy - recommendations for clinical guidance

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an increasingly important component in the treatment of both locally advanced and early-stage breast cancer. With this, a debate on the timing of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged. At the end of the last century, the SLNB was introduced as an axillary staging modality, and this paper aims to further elucidate this issue in the context of NAC. We compiled available data on the SLNB after NAC and provide clinical guidance for timing the SLNB in this context. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that the SLNB can be performed after NAC in all cases. In patients with a clinically node-negative (cN0) status prior to NAC, the SLNB should be performed after NAC, and in case of a histologically confirmed negative SLNB, a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has no added value and can be omitted. In patients with clinically positive nodal involvement (cN+) prior to NAC, all axillary surgery can also be performed after NAC.

A central review of histopathology reports after breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the neo-tango trial

Background:

Neo-tAnGo, a National Cancer Research Network (NCRN) multicentre randomised neoadjuvant chemotherapy trial in early breast cancer, enroled 831 patients in the United Kingdom. We report a central review of post-chemotherapy histopathology reports on the surgical specimens, to assess the presence and degree of response.

Methods:

A central independent two-reader review (EP and HME) of histopathology reports from post-treatment surgical specimens was performed. The quality and completeness of pathology reporting across all centres was assessed. The reviews included pathological response to chemotherapy (pathological complete response (pCR); minimal residual disease (MRD); and lesser degrees of response), laterality, the number of axillary metastases and axillary nodes, and the type of surgery. A consensus was reached after discussion.

Results:

In all, 825 surgical reports from 816 patients were available for review. Out of 4125 data items there were 347 discrepant results (8.4% of classifications), which involved 281 patients. These involved grading of breast response (169 but only 9 involving pCR vs MRD); laterality (6); presence of axillary metastasis (35); lymph node counts (108); and type of axillary surgery (29). Excluding cases with pCR, only 45% of reports included any comment regarding response in the breast and 30% in the axillary lymph nodes.

Conclusion:

We found considerable variability in the completeness of reporting of surgical specimens within this national neoadjuvant breast cancer trial. This highlights the need for consensus guidelines among trial groups on histopathology reporting, and the participation of histopathologists throughout the development and analysis of neoadjuvant trials.

Sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: past, present, and future

Sentinel node biopsy has replaced axillary lymph node dissection as the standard of care in early breast cancers. Sentinel node biopsy represents a highly accurate and less-morbid axillary staging, which allows most patients to avoid unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection and its morbidity. This review provides information including several issues which are still under debate, such as clinical significance of micrometastases, avoidance of axillary lymph node dissection for patients with positive sentinel nodes, accuracy and timing of sentinel node biopsy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and how many sentinel nodes are sufficient for removal. Finally, a new topic is introduced: superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection of metastases in sentinel nodes localized by computed tomography (CT)-lymphography (CT-LG) in patients with breast cancer. SPIO-enhanced MR imaging is a useful method of detecting metastases in sentinel nodes localized by CT-LG in patients with breast cancer. Patients with clinically negative nodes may be spared even sentinel node biopsy when the sentinel node is diagnosed as disease free using SPIO-enhanced MR imaging.

Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer

AIMS

The standard technique for intraoperative tumour localization of clinically occult tumours is wire-guided localization (WGL). This, however, this has several disadvantages. The aim of the present work is to report our single-centre experience with intraoperative ultrasound-guided (IOUS) excision, performed by surgeons, combined with intraoperative assessment of macroscopic pathologic and ultrasound margins in non-palpable invasive cancers indicated for conservative breast therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two-hundred and twenty-five non-palpable invasive breast cancers were subjected to excision with IOUS. The lesion was located in the operating room with a high-frequency ultrasound probe (8-12 MHz), which was then used to guide surgical removal. The specimen margins were estimated by ultrasonography and macroscopic pathologic examination. The sensitivity of IOUS and effectiveness in the characterization of the specimen margins were evaluated, assessing the need for reoperation.

RESULTS

Pathologic tumour size was 12.0 ± 6.7 mm and 13 lesions (6.4 %) were <5 mm. The sensitivity of IOUS localization was 99.6% (224/225 cases). Only one cancer of less than 5 mm was not localized. The average weight of the specimens was 26.1 g. A second operation was required to remove margins in the 4% of cases (9/225). In 5 cases remains of in situ or invasive carcinoma were found. In two cases, conservative surgery was converted to mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

IOUS excision combined with the intraoperative assessment of the macroscopic margins of non-palpable breast cancers is a safe, useful, and efficient technique. We obtained an excellent characterization of tumour margins with moderate removal of breast tissue and consequently a lower number of reoperations were required and good cosmetic results were obtained. We believe that use of this technique in conservative breast cancer surgery should be recommended.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: window to management of the axilla

In patients with primary breast cancer, several large, randomized prospective trials have shown that sentinel node biopsy (SNB) substantially reduces the morbidity associated with axillary surgery compared with formal axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Moreover, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-32 trial has demonstrated that when the sentinel node reveals no evidence of metastatic disease, then no further ALND is required. Recently, the results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial have challenged the notion that all patients with metastases to the sentinel node require ALND. The results of this trial suggest that in selected sentinel node-positive patients, ALND can be potentially avoided. Yet, some concerns about the ACOSOG Z0011 trial have been raised, and these concerns may have implications in the widespread implementation of the results of this trial. Since the advent of the SNB technology, occult metastases within the sentinel node are frequently observed, and the significance of these findings remains controversial. Finally, this review considers special situations, such as pregnancy and the neoadjuvant setting, where the use of SNB should be applied judiciously. The SNB technology has dramatically improved the quality of life for women with breast cancer, and further modifications of its role in breast cancer treatment should be based on evidence obtained from randomized, controlled trials.

The role for sentinel lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients who present with node-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection has been investigated after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and has shown mixed results. Our objective was to evaluate SLN dissection in node-positive patients and to determine whether postchemotherapy ultrasound could select patients for this technique.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2010, 150 patients with biopsy proven axillary metastasis underwent SLN dissection after chemotherapy and 121 underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed before and after chemotherapy. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test for nodal response and multivariate logistic regression for factors associated with false-negative events.

RESULTS

Median age was 52 years. Median tumor size at presentation was 2 cm. The SLN was identified in 93 % (139/150). In 111 patients in whom a SLN was identified and ALND performed, 15 patients had a false-negative SLN (20.8 %). In the 52 patients with normalized nodes on ultrasound, the false-negative rate decreased to 16.1 %. Multivariate analysis revealed smaller initial tumor size and fewer SLNs removed (<2) were associated with a false-negative SLN. There were 63 (42 %) patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) in the nodes. Of those with normalized nodes on ultrasound, 38 (51 %) of 75 had a pCR. Only 25 (33 %) of 75 with persistent suspicious/malignant-appearing nodes had a pCR (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 42 % of patients have a pCR in the nodes after chemotherapy. Normalized morphology on ultrasound correlates with a higher pCR rate. SLN dissection in these patients is associated with a false-negative rate of 20.8 %. Removing fewer than two SLNs is associated with a higher false-negative rate.

Application of ACOSOG Z0011 criteria reduces perioperative costs

BACKGROUND

The ACOSOG Z0011 (Z0011) trial concluded that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) without completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) provides excellent regional control in women with T1-T2 sentinel lymph node (SLN) positive breast cancers receiving breast conservation therapy. We determined whether application of Z0011 guidelines would reduce costs.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with invasive breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and SLNB at our institution during 2009 was performed. We determined the number of overnight hospital admissions following ALND and estimated costs pertaining to the perioperative surgical management of the axilla patients actually received, and compared those to the estimated number of inpatient days and perioperative costs if Z0011 guidelines had been followed for eligible patients. The 2011 Medicare Fee Schedule was used to estimate costs for procedures, and costs for OR time were estimated using procedure length and cost of OR time per minute.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients underwent lumpectomy with SLNB and had at least 1 positive SLN. Estimated costs related to perioperative surgical management of the axilla were $322,775, and there were 36 overnight admissions. Applying Z0011 criteria, 51 patients (72%) would have been eligible to forego completion ALND. Estimated costs would have been $264,513 with 13 overnight admissions, translating into a cost savings of $58,262 and 23 fewer overnight admissions.

CONCLUSION

Application of Z0011 guidelines resulted in cost savings, with a 64% reduction in inpatient hospital days and an 18% reduction in early perioperative costs.

Surgical considerations in patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being increasingly used in the treatment of patients presenting with early-stage, operable breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy downsizes most tumors, allowing appropriately selected patients to undergo breast-conserving therapy. Management of the axilla in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy is dictated by whether patients present with clinically node-negative or node-positive disease. Patients with clinically node-negative disease can undergo sentinel lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with axillary lymph node dissection reserved for patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. For patients with clinically node-positive disease at presentation, the current standard of care is axillary lymph node dissection. An ongoing cooperative group trial is investigating the utility of sentinel lymph node surgery in the clinically node-positive population.

Incorporation of sentinel lymph node metastasis size into a nomogram predicting nonsentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis size is an important predictor of non-SLN involvement. The goal of this study was to construct a nomogram incorporating SLN metastasis size to accurately predict non-SLN involvement in patients with SLN-positive disease.

METHODS

We identified 509 patients with invasive breast cancer with a positive SLN who underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Clinicopathologic data including age, tumor size, histology, grade, presence of multifocal disease, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, HER2/neu status, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), number of SLN(s) identified, number of positive SLN(s), maximum SLN metastasis size and the presence of extranodal extension were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified factors predictive of positive non-SLNs. Using these variables, a nomogram was constructed and subsequently validated using an external cohort of 464 patients.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, the following factors were predictive of positive non-SLNs: number of SLN identified (P < 0.001), number of positive SLN (P < 0.001), SLN metastasis size (P < 0.001), extranodal extension (P < 0.001), tumor size (P = 0.001), LVI (P = 0.019), and histology (P = 0.034). On multivariate analysis, all factors remained significant except LVI. A nomogram was created using these variables (AUC = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.84). When applied to an external cohort, the nomogram was accurate and discriminating with an AUC = 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.77).

CONCLUSION

SLN metastasis size is an important predictor for identifying non-SLN disease. In this study, we incorporated SLN metastasis size into a nomogram that accurately predicts the likelihood of having additional axillary metastasis and can assist in personalizing surgical management of breast cancer.

Bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab and the antimetabolites capecitabine and gemcitabine have been shown to improve outcomes when added to taxanes in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The primary aims of this trial were to determine whether the addition of capecitabine or gemcitabine to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, would increase the rates of pathological complete response in the breast in women with operable, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer and whether adding bevacizumab to these chemotherapy regimens would increase the rates of pathological complete response.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 1206 patients to receive neoadjuvant therapy consisting of docetaxel (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area on day 1), docetaxel (75 mg per square meter on day 1) plus capecitabine (825 mg per square meter twice a day on days 1 to 14), or docetaxel (75 mg per square meter on day 1) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8) for four cycles, with all regimens followed by treatment with doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide for four cycles. Patients were also randomly assigned to receive or not to receive bevacizumab (15 mg per kilogram of body weight) for the first six cycles of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The addition of capecitabine or gemcitabine to docetaxel therapy, as compared with docetaxel therapy alone, did not significantly increase the rate of pathological complete response (29.7% and 31.8%, respectively, vs. 32.7%; P=0.69). Both capecitabine and gemcitabine were associated with increased toxic effects--specifically, the hand-foot syndrome, mucositis, and neutropenia. The addition of bevacizumab significantly increased the rate of pathological complete response (28.2% without bevacizumab vs. 34.5% with bevacizumab, P=0.02). The effect of bevacizumab on the rate of pathological complete response was not the same in the hormone-receptor-positive and hormone-receptor-negative subgroups. The addition of bevacizumab increased the rates of hypertension, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, the hand-foot syndrome, and mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased the rate of pathological complete response, which was the primary end point of this study. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00408408.).

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with operable breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in operable breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2008-2011, 88 women, mean age 49.4 years, with infiltrating breast carcinoma, were studied prospectively. Patients were T1-3, N0-1, M0. Prior to surgery, the patients received chemotherapy (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, docetaxel), and trastuzumab in Her2/neu-positive patients. Axillary status was established by physical examination, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of any suspicious lymph node. The day before surgery, 74-111 MBq of (99m)Tc-albumin nanocolloid was injected periareolarly. All patients underwent breast surgery, with SLNB, followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) were examined by frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemical analysis or One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA).

RESULTS

Mean tumor size: 3.5 cm. Histologic type: 69 invasive ductal, 16 invasive lobular and 3 others. Thirty seven patients had clinical/ultrasound node-positive at presentation. Clinical response of primary tumor to NAC: complete in 38, partial in 45, and stable disease in 5 patients. A pathological complete response was achieved in 25. All patients were clinically node-negative after NAC. SLN identification rate was 92.0%. Six of 7 patients in whom SLN was not found had clinical/ultrasound positive axilla before NAC. SLN accurately determined the axillary status in 96.5%. False negative rate was 8.3%. In 69.4% of patients, SLN was the only positive node. The mean number of SLN removed was 1.7 and nodes resected from the ALND were 13.2.

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy after NAC can predict the axillary status with a high accuracy in patients with breast cancer, avoiding unnecessary ALND.

Impact of progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical management of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is standard therapy for locally advanced breast cancer, it remains controversial for early-stage disease due to concerns that disease progression may make breast-conservation therapy (BCT), or even operability, impossible. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of disease progression during NCT on surgical management.

METHODS

We reviewed clinicopathological data on patients who received NCT for stage I-III breast cancer from 1994 to 2007. Chemotherapy regimens were anthracycline-and/or taxane-based as determined by the treating medical oncologist.

RESULTS

Of 1,928 patients who received NCT, 1,762 (91%) had a partial or complete response, 107 (6%) had stable disease (SD), and 59 (3%) progressed (PD) while receiving at least one regimen. Of the patients with progressive disease, 40 (68%) patients underwent mastectomy, 12 (20%) underwent BCT, and 7 (12%) did not undergo surgery. In patients who underwent mastectomy, only three (8%) were BCT candidates before progression. Overall, disease progression changed the operative plan in 11 (0.5%) patients: 3 developed distant metastasis, 2 developed clinical lymphadenopathy, 3 required mastectomy instead of BCT, 2 became inoperable, and 1 required flap closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease progression while receiving NCT is infrequent (3%), but early identification may allow for change to other, potentially beneficial, therapeutic interventions. Patients with breast cancer who receive NCT should be evaluated frequently for response to therapy. Overall, progression during NCT changes the surgical management in a small proportion of patients.

Sentinel lymph node dissection is technically feasible in older breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggested that sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rates are lower in older breast cancer patients. This study was undertaken to compare identification rates in patients 70 years of age and older versus those younger than 70 years in a large cohort undergoing sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND).

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing SLND between August 1993 and December 2006 were identified and grouped by age. Clinicopathologic data and details regarding the procedure were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 3995 patients undergoing SLND, 3406 (85.3%) were under 70 years of age, and 589 (14.7%) were 70 years or older. Age was significantly associated with clinical stage (P = .001) and tumor grade (P < .0001). A greater proportion in the older group had clinical stage I disease (74.7% vs. 66.8%), and a lower proportion had grade 3 tumors (24.0% vs. 36.1%). There were no significant differences by age in the mapping method or site of injection. Overall SLN identification rate was 97.2% and did not differ significantly by age. The SLN was positive in 23.1% of younger patients and 18.2% of older patients (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node dissection can be performed with high identification rates regardless of patient age. Breast cancer patients 70 years and older with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes should be offered SLND, as the presence of lymph node metastasis may alter adjuvant therapy recommendations.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is precise after primary systemic therapy in stage II-III breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in SLN negative patients is a standard of care for most breast cancer patients. SLNB for axillary staging after primary systemic therapy (PST) is still under discussion because of possibly reduced accuracy, while data are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of SLNB after PST.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 185 breast cancer patients were treated with PST; 160 patients received preoperative chemotherapy, and 25 patients received preoperative endocrine therapy. Thus, 143 of 160 patients with preoperative chemotherapy and 22 of 25 patients with preoperative endocrine therapy were eligible for evaluation. The combination of blue dye and radioactive tracer was used for identification of SLNs. All patients received SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Pathologic assessment of SLNs was performed and compared to non-SLN status.

RESULTS

Pathologic complete response rates and breast conserving therapy rates were 15.4 and 78.3% in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 0 and 77.3% in the preoperative endocrine therapy group, respectively. Identification rate, sensitivity, overall accuracy, and false-negative rate were 81.1% (116 of 143), 91.7% (55 of 60), 95.7% (111 of 116), and 8.3% (5 of 60) in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 77.3% (17 of 22), 90.0% (9 of 10), 94.1% (16 of 17), and 10.0% (1 of 10) in the preoperative endocrine therapy group, respectively.

DISCUSSION

SLNB after primary systemic therapy is accurate, and the results are comparable to those of primary SLNB. SLNB after PST could spare ALND in up to 40% of patients with primary positive axillary lymph nodes and should be considered as a standard for axillary staging in those patients.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pros and cons

This article summarizes the relative pros and cons surrounding the timing of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Several institutions initiated prospective trials of SLN biopsy performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in conjunction with a completion axillary lymph node dissection, with the goal of ultimately showing that SLN biopsy could be safely and accurately performed after the patient completed systemic therapy. Other institutions adopted a policy of performing SLN biopsy before initiation of chemotherapy. This avoided the issue surrounding the accuracy of SLN biopsy after chemotherapy and potentially provided information that might influence adjuvant therapy decisions. This article addresses the clinical questions regarding the 2 approaches including the accuracy of the procedure and the prognostic information gleaned.

What's new in neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer?

Neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer is currently being used in patients with advanced disease as well as with increasing application in those that present with initially operable breast cancer. The current clinical benefits of the use of NAC include: NAC increases the possibility of the use of BCS, the safety of NAC is comparable with that of adjuvant chemotherapy, and pCR may be predictive of overall survival. Although there are still unresolved clinical questions regarding the use of neoadjuvant therapy in initially operable breast cancer, there appears to be equivalent survival to the standard of care. Future research should be aimed at tailoring treatment to individual patients using specific tumor characteristics that may predict response to different types of chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy.