Connective tissue growth factor: a fibrogenic master switch in fibrotic liver diseases

Connective tissue growth factor is a Smad2 regulated amplifier of transforming growth factor beta actions in hepatocytes--but without modulating bone morphogenetic protein 7 signaling

In vivo knockdown of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) was recently shown to attenuate the formation of experimental liver fibrosis. The secreted, cysteine-rich growth factor is proposed to adversely modulate the binding of profibrogenic transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) and its natural antagonist bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) to their cognate receptors in several cellular systems, but the functionality of CTGF in modulation of the TGF-beta/BMP signaling pathways is still unknown. This study aims at characterizing a potentially differential modulating role of CTGF on TGF-beta- and BMP7-dependent transactivation of reporter gene [Ad-(CAGA)(12)-MLP-luc, Ad-hCTGF-luc, and Ad-(BRE)(2)-luc reporter gene] expression in rat hepatocytes. In this context, emphasis is also placed on the differential roles of Smad2 and Smad3 in the TGF-beta-dependent transactivation of the endogenous CTGF gene and the CTGF gene reporter, as investigated following adenoviral infection of wild-type and dominant negative Smad2/3 or treatment with the specific inhibitor of Smad3 or ALK5-specific (SB-431542) inhibitor. In this analysis, we found (1) a selective transcriptional activation of the CTGF promoter by Smad2 (but not Smad3); (2) the failure of BMP7 to inhibit the transcriptional activation of the Smad3-selective (CAGA)(12)-luc reporter by TGF-beta, as well as the failure of TGF-beta to inhibit the transcriptional activation of the Smad5-selective (BRE)(2)-luc reporter by BMP7; and (3) the sensitization of hepatocytes toward TGF-beta type I receptor (ALK5)/Smad2 and Smad3-mediated TGF-beta signaling by CTGF, whereas BMP type I receptor (ALK1)/Smad5-mediated BMP7 signaling is not modulated.

CONCLUSION

CTGF acts as a Smad2-dependent sensitizer of TGF-beta actions that does not influence BMP7 signaling in hepatocytes.

Non-invasive biomarkers for monitoring the fibrogenic process in liver: A short survey

The clinical course of chronic liver diseases is significantly dependent on the progression rate and the extent of fibrosis, i.e. the non-structured replacement of necrotic parenchyma by extracellular matrix. Fibrogenesis, i.e. the development of fibrosis can be regarded as an unlimited wound healing process, which is based on matrix (connective tissue) synthesis in activated hepatic stellate cells, fibroblasts (fibrocytes), hepatocytes and biliary epithelial cells, which are converted to matrix-producing (myo-)fibroblasts by a process defined as epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Blood (non-invasive) biomarkers of fibrogenesis and fibrosis can be divided into class I and class II analytes. Class I biomarkers are those single tests, which are based on the pathophysiology of fibrosis, whereas class II biomarkers are mostly multiparametric algorithms, which have been statistically evaluated with regard to the detection and activity of ongoing fibrosis. Currently available markers fulfil the criteria of ideal clinical-chemical tests only partially, but increased understanding of the complex pathogenesis of fibrosis offers additional ways for pathophysiologically well based serum (plasma) biomarkers. They include TGF-β-driven marker proteins, bone marrow-derived cells (fibrocytes), and cytokines, which govern pro- and anti-fibrotic activities. Proteomic and glycomic approaches of serum are under investigation to set up specific protein or carbohydrate profiles in patients with liver fibrosis. These and other novel parameters will supplement or eventually replace liver biopsy/histology, high resolution imaging analysis, and elastography for the detection and monitoring of patients at risk of developing liver fibrosis.