Painful diabetic neuropathy: epidemiology, natural history, early diagnosis, and treatment options

Interplay of sorbitol pathway of glucose metabolism, 12/15-lipoxygenase, and mitogen-activated protein kinases in the pathogenesis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy

The interactions among multiple pathogenetic mechanisms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy largely remain unexplored. Increased activity of aldose reductase, the first enzyme of the sorbitol pathway, leads to accumulation of cytosolic Ca²⁺, essentially required for 12/15-lipoxygenase activation. The latter, in turn, causes oxidative-nitrosative stress, an important trigger of mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation. This study therefore evaluated the interplay of aldose reductase, 12/15-lipoxygenase, and MAPKs in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. In experiment 1, male control and streptozotocin-diabetic mice were maintained with or without the aldose reductase inhibitor fidarestat, 16 mg kg⁻¹ d⁻¹, for 12 weeks. In experiment 2, male control and streptozotocin-diabetic wild-type (C57Bl6/J) and 12/15-lipoxygenase-deficient mice were used. Fidarestat treatment did not affect diabetes-induced increase in glucose concentrations, but normalized sorbitol and fructose concentrations (enzymatic spectrofluorometric assays) as well as 12(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic concentration (ELISA), a measure of 12/15-lipoxygenase activity, in the sciatic nerve and spinal cord. 12/15-lipoxygenase expression in these two tissues (Western blot analysis) as well as dorsal root ganglia (immunohistochemistry) was similarly elevated in untreated and fidarestat-treated diabetic mice. 12/15-Lipoxygenase gene deficiency prevented diabetes-associated p38 MAPK and ERK, but not SAPK/JNK, activation in the sciatic nerve (Western blot analysis) and all three MAPK activation in the dorsal root ganglia (immunohistochemistry). In contrast, spinal cord p38 MAPK, ERK, and SAPK/JNK were similarly activated in diabetic wild-type and 12/15-lipoxygenase⁻/⁻ mice. These findings identify the nature and tissue specificity of interactions among three major mechanisms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and suggest that combination treatments, rather than monotherapies, can sometimes be an optimal choice for its management.

Economic evaluation of duloxetine as a first-line treatment for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Mexico

OBJECTIVE

To perform an economic evaluation of duloxetine, pregabalin, and both branded and generic gabapentin for managing pain in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) in Mexico.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The analysis was conducted using a 3-month decision model, which compares duloxetine 60 mg once daily (DUL), pregabalin 150 mg twice daily (PGB), and gabapentin 600 mg three-times daily (GBP) for PDPN patients with moderate-to-severe pain. A systematic review was performed and placebo-adjusted risk ratios for achieving good pain relief (GPR), adverse events (AE), and withdrawal owing to intolerable AE were calculated. Direct medical costs included drug acquisition and additional visits due to lack of efficacy (poor pain relief) or intolerable AE. Unit costs were taken from local sources. Adherence rates were used to estimate the expected drug costs. All costs are expressed in 2010 Mexican Pesos (MXN). Utility values drawn from published literature were applied to health states. The proportion of patients with GPR and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were assessed.

RESULTS

Branded-GBP was dominated by all the other options. PGB was more costly and less effective than DUL. Compared with branded-GBP and PGB, DUL led to savings of 1.01 and 1.74 million MXN (per 1000 patients). The incremental cost per QALY gained with DUL used instead of generic-GBP was $102 433 MXN. This amount is slightly lower than the estimated gross domestic product per capita in Mexico for 2010. During a second-order Monte Carlo simulation, DUL had the highest probability of being cost-effective (61%), followed by generic-GBP (25%) and PGB (14%).

LIMITATIONS

Study limitations include a short timeframe and using data from different dosage schemes for GBP and PGB.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that DUL provides overall savings and better health outcomes compared with branded-GBP and PGB. Administering DUL rather than generic-GBP is a cost-effective intervention to manage PDPN in Mexico.

Diabetic neuropathy enhances voltage-activated Ca2+ channel activity and its control by M4 muscarinic receptors in primary sensory neurons

Painful neuropathy is one of the most serious complications of diabetes and remains difficult to treat. The muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonists have a profound analgesic effect on painful diabetic neuropathy. Here we determined changes in T-type and high voltage-activated Ca(2+) channels (HVACCs) and their regulation by mAChRs in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons in a rat model of diabetic neuropathy. The HVACC currents in large neurons, T-type currents in medium and large neurons, the percentage of small DRG neurons with T-type currents, and the Cav3.2 mRNA level were significantly increased in diabetic rats compared with those in control rats. The mAChR agonist oxotremorine-M significantly inhibited HVACCs in a greater proportion of DRG neurons with and without T-type currents in diabetic than in control rats. In contrast, oxotremorine-M had no effect on HVACCs in small and large neurons with T-type currents and in most medium neurons with T-type currents from control rats. The M(2) and M(4) antagonist himbacine abolished the effect of oxotremorine-M on HVACCs in both groups. The selective M(4) antagonist muscarinic toxin-3 caused a greater attenuation of the effect of oxotremorine-M on HVACCs in small and medium DRG neurons in diabetic than in control rats. Additionally, the mRNA and protein levels of M(4), but not M(2), in the DRG were significantly greater in diabetic than in control rats. Our findings suggest that diabetic neuropathy potentiates the activity of T-type and HVACCs in primary sensory neurons. M(4) mAChRs are up-regulated in DRG neurons and probably account for increased muscarinic analgesic effects in diabetic neuropathic pain.

Prevalence of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy among patients with diabetes mellitus in the Middle East region

The prevalence of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) was evaluated in type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (n = 4097) attending outpatient clinics across the Middle East. Overall, 53.7% of 3989 patients with DN4 data met the criteria for painful DPN (Douleur Neuropathique-4 [DN4] scores ≥ 4). Significant predictors of painful DPN included long history (≥ 10 years) of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 2.43), age ≥ 65 years (OR 2.13), age 50 - 64 years (OR 1.75), presence of type 1 versus type 2 diabetes (OR 1.59), body mass index > 30 kg/m(2) (OR 1.35) and female gender (OR 1.27). Living in one of the Gulf States was associated with the lowest odds of having painful DPN (OR 0.44). The odds of painful DPN were highest among patients with peripheral vascular disease (OR 4.98), diabetic retinopathy (OR 3.90) and diabetic nephropathy (OR 3.23). Because of the high prevalence and associated suffering, disability and economic burden of painful DPN, it is important that diabetic patients are periodically screened, using a simple instrument such as the DN4, and receive appropriate treatment if symptoms develop.

Diabetic neuropathy: cellular mechanisms as therapeutic targets

In patients with diabetes, nerve injury is a common complication that leads to chronic pain, numbness and substantial loss of quality of life. Good glycemic control can decrease the incidence of diabetic neuropathy, but more than half of all patients with diabetes still develop this complication. There is no approved treatment to prevent or halt diabetic neuropathy, and only symptomatic pain therapies, with variable efficacy, are available. New insights into the mechanisms leading to the development of diabetic neuropathy continue to point to systemic and cellular imbalances in metabolites of glucose and lipids. In the PNS, sensory neurons, Schwann cells and the microvascular endothelium are vulnerable to oxidative and inflammatory stress in the presence of these altered metabolic substrates. This Review discusses the emerging cellular mechanisms that are activated in the diabetic milieu of hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and impaired insulin signaling. We highlight the pathways to cellular injury, thereby identifying promising therapeutic targets, including mitochondrial function and inflammation.

Tapentadol extended-release for treatment of chronic pain: a review

Tapentadol is a centrally acting analgesic with a dual mechanism of action of mu receptor agonism and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Tapentadol immediate-release is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of moderate-to-severe acute pain. It was developed to decrease the intolerability issue associated with opioids. Tapentadol extended-release has a 12-hour duration of effect, and has recently been evaluated for pain in patients with chronic osteoarthritis, low back pain, and pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Tapentadol extended-release was found to provide safe and highly effective analgesia for the treatment of chronic pain conditions, including moderate-to-severe chronic osteoarthritis pain and low back pain. Initial trials demonstrating efficacy in neuropathic pain suggest that tapentadol has comparable analgesic effectiveness and better gastrointestinal tolerability than opioid comparators, and demonstrates effectiveness in settings of inflammatory, somatic, and neuropathic pain. Gastrointestinal intolerance and central nervous system effects were the major adverse events noted. Tapentadol will need to be rigorously tested in chronic neuropathic pain, cancer-related pain, and cancer-related neuropathic pain.

Characterisation of glyoxalase I in a streptozocin-induced mouse model of diabetes with painful and insensate neuropathy

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DN) is a common complication of diabetes; however, the mechanisms producing positive or negative symptoms are not well understood. The enzyme glyoxalase I (GLO1) detoxifies reactive dicarbonyls that form AGEs and may affect the way sensory neurons respond to heightened AGE levels in DN. We hypothesised that differential GLO1 levels in sensory neurons may lead to differences in AGE formation and modulate the phenotype of DN.

METHODS

Inbred strains of mice were used to assess the variability of Glo1 expression by quantitative RT-PCR. Non-diabetic C57BL/6 mice were used to characterise the distribution of GLO1 in neural tissues by immunofluorescence. Behavioural assessments were conducted in diabetic A/J and C57BL/6 mice to determine mechanical sensitivity, and GLO1 abundance was determined by western blot.

RESULTS

GLO1 immunoreactivity was found throughout the nervous system, but selectively in small, unmyelinated peptidergic dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons that are involved in pain transmission. GLO1 protein was present at various levels in DRG from different inbred mice strains. Diabetic A/J and C57BL/6 mice, two mouse strains with different levels of GLO1, displayed dramatically different behavioural responses to mechanical stimuli. Diabetic C57BL/6 mice also had a reduced abundance of GLO1 following diabetes induction.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

These findings reveal that the abundance of GLO1 varies between different murine strains and within different sensory neuron populations. These differences could lead to different responses of sensory neurons to the toxic effects of hyperglycaemia and reactive dicarbonyls associated with diabetes.

Pharmacological treatment of neuropathic cancer pain: a comprehensive review of the current literature

Neuropathic cancer pain (NCP), commonly encountered in clinical practice, may be cancer-related, namely resulting from nervous system tumor invasion, surgical nerve damage during tumor removal, radiation-induced nerve damage and chemotherapy-related neuropathy, or may be of benign origin, unrelated to cancer. A neuropathic component is evident in about 1/3 of cancer pain cases. Although from a pathophysiological perspective NCP may differ from chronic neuropathic pain (NP), such as noncancer-related pain, clinical practice, and limited publications have shown that these two pain entities may share some treatment modalities. For example, co-analgesics have been well integrated into cancer pain-management strategies and are often used as First-Line options for the treatment of NCP. These drugs, including antidepressants and anticonvulsants, are recommended by evidence-based guidelines, whereas, others such as lidocaine patch 5%, are supported by randomized, controlled, clinical data and are included in guidelines for restricted conditions treatment. The vast majority of these drugs have already been proven useful in the management of benign NP syndromes. Treatment decisions for patients with NP can be difficult. The intrinsic difficulties in performing randomized controlled trials in cancer pain have traditionally justified the acceptance of drugs already known to be effective in benign NP for the management of malignant NP, despite the lack of relevant high quality data. Interest in NCP mechanisms and pharmacotherapy has increased, resulting in significant mechanism-based treatment advances for the future. In this comprehensive review, we present the latest knowledge regarding NCP pharmacological management.

Systemic and spinal administration of etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor, blocks tactile allodynia in diabetic mice

Painful diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common forms of neuropathic pain syndromes. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) is a proinflammatory cytokine that has been implicated as a key pain mediator in the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain conditions. Recent studies showed that endogenous TNF-alpha production was also accelerated in neural tissues and spinal cord under chronic hyperglycemia. Thus, in this study, we investigated whether pharmacological inhibition of TNF-alpha by etanercept, a TNF-alpha antagonist, could block behavioral sign of diabetic neuropathic pain. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin (STZ) (200 mg/kg, i.p.) in Balb-c mice and behavioral tests were performed between 45 and 60 days after STZ administration. Mechanical and thermal sensitivities were measured by a series of calibrated Von Frey filaments and hot plate test, respectively. Etanercept was given by either intravenous (i.v.), intrathecal (i.th.) or intraplantar (i.pl.) routes to the diabetic mice. Tactile allodynia, but not thermal hyperalgesia, developed in diabetic mice. Both i.v. (1, 10 and 20 mg/kg) or i.th. (1, 5 and 10 μg/mouse) treatments with etanercept produced dose dependent reversal of tactile allodynia in diabetic mice. However, etanercept was found to be inactive against allodynia when given i.pl. (1, 5 and 10 μg/mouse). Our results suggest that etanercept has promising effects on diabetic neuropathic pain with antiallodynic effects when given systemically or intrathecally.

Fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain--differences and similarities. A comparison of 3057 patients with diabetic painful neuropathy and fibromyalgia

Background

Patients with diabetic neuropathy (DPN) and fibromyalgia differ substantially in pathogenetic factors and the spatial distribution of the perceived pain. We questioned whether, despite these obvious differences, similar abnormal sensory complaints and pain qualities exist in both entities. We hypothesized that similar sensory symptoms might be associated with similar mechanisms of pain generation. The aims were (1) to compare epidemiological features and co-morbidities and (2) to identify similarities and differences of sensory symptoms in both entities.

Methods

The present multi-center study compares epidemiological data and sensory symptoms of a large cohort of 1434 fibromyalgia patients and 1623 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Data acquisition included standard demographic questions and self-report questionnaires (MOS sleep scale, PHQ-9, PainDETECT). To identify subgroups of patients with characteristic combinations of symptoms (sensory profiles) a cluster analysis was performed using all patients in both cohorts.

Results

Significant differences in co-morbidities (depression, sleep disturbance) were found between both disorders. Patients of both aetiologies chose very similar descriptors to characterize their sensory perceptions. Burning pain, prickling and touch-evoked allodynia were present in the same frequency. Five subgroups with distinct symptom profiles could be detected. Two of the subgroups were characteristic for fibromyalgia whereas one profile occurred predominantly in DPN patients. Two profiles were found frequently in patients of both entities (20-35%).

Conclusions

DPN and fibromyalgia patients experience very similar sensory phenomena. The combination of sensory symptoms - the sensory profile - is in most cases distinct and almost unique for each one of the two entities indicating aetiology-specific mechanisms of symptom generation. Beside the unique aetiology-specific sensory profiles an overlap of sensory profiles can be found in 20-35% of patients of both aetiologies.

PARP inhibition alleviates diabetes-induced systemic oxidative stress and neural tissue 4-hydroxynonenal adduct accumulation: correlation with peripheral nerve function

This study evaluated the role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in systemic oxidative stress and 4-hydoxynonenal adduct accumulation in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Control and streptozotocin-diabetic rats were maintained with or without treatment with the PARP inhibitor, 1,5-isoquinolinediol, 3 mg kg(-1) day(-1), for 10 weeks after an initial 2 weeks. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated protein content in peripheral nerve and spinal cord (Western blot analysis) and dorsal root ganglion neurons and nonneuronal cells (fluorescence immunohistochemistry), as well as by indices of peripheral nerve function. Diabetic rats displayed increased urinary isoprostane and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine excretion (ELISA) and 4-hydroxynonenal adduct accumulation in endothelial and Schwann cells of the peripheral nerve, neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes of the spinal cord and neurons and glial cells of the dorsal root ganglia (double-label fluorescence immunohistochemistry), as well as motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity deficits, thermal hypoalgesia, and tactile allodynia. PARP inhibition counteracted diabetes-induced systemic oxidative stress and 4-hydroxynonenal adduct accumulation in peripheral nerve and spinal cord (Western blot analysis) and dorsal root ganglion neurons (perikarya, fluorescence immunohistochemistry), which correlated with improvement of large and small nerve fiber function. The findings reveal the important role of PARP activation in systemic oxidative stress and 4-hydroxynonenal adduct accumulation in diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Asymptomatic small fiber neuropathy in diabetes mellitus: investigations with intraepidermal nerve fiber density, quantitative sensory testing and laser-evoked potentials

This study aimed at evaluating the performance of a battery of morphological and functional tests for the assessment of small nerve fiber loss in asymptomatic diabetic neuropathy (DNP). Patients diagnosed for ≥10 years with type 1 (n = 10) or type 2 (n = 13) diabetes mellitus (DM) without conventional symptoms or signs of DNP were recruited and compared with healthy controls (n = 18) and patients with overt DNP (n = 5). Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFd) was measured with PGP9.5 immunostaining on punch skin biopsies performed at the distal leg. Functional tests consisted of quantitative sensory testing (QST) for light-touch, cool, warm and heat pain detection thresholds and brain-evoked potentials with electrical (SEPs) and CO(2) laser stimulation [laser-evoked potentials (LEPs)] of hand dorsum and distal leg using small (0.8 mm(2)) and large (20 mm(2)) beam sizes. Results confirmed a state of asymptomatic DNP in DM, but only at the distal leg. Defining a critical small fiber loss as a reduction of IENFd ≤-2 z scores of healthy controls, this state prevailed in type 2 (30%) over type 1 DM (10%) patients despite similar disease duration and current glycemic control. LEPs with the small laser beam performed best in terms of sensitivity (91%), specificity (83%) and area-under-the ROC curve (0.924). Although this performance was not statically different from that of warm and cold detection threshold, LEPs offer an advantage over QST given that they bypass the subjective report and are therefore unbiased by perceptual factors.

Efficacy of pregabalin for peripheral neuropathic pain: results of an 8-week, flexible-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in China

BACKGROUND

Several classes of medications such as tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, narcotic analgesics, and α2-δ ligands, such as pregabalin, have been reported to be efficacious in the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in whites. However, no large double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have been reported that evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin for the treatment of neuropathic pain in a Chinese population in China.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of flexible-dose pregabalin in treatment of Chinese patients diagnosed with painful DPN or PHN.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, parallel-group study in which patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio and treated with either flexible-dose pregabalin, 150 to 600 mg/d, or corresponding flexible-dose placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change in the mean pain score based on a daily pain rating scale (DPRS; ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain]). Secondary end points included Daily Sleep Interference scale, short form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) scale, and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) scales. Adverse events and physical and laboratory examination results were also collected.

RESULTS

Pregabalin and placebo treatment groups were well-matched in terms of demographic and patient characteristics. On the primary outcome, end point change in mean DPRS score, treatment with pregabalin (N = 206) resulted in significant improvement compared with results with placebo (N = 102), with a least squares mean difference score of -0.6 (P = 0.005). With regard to responder rates, 64% and 52% of patients treated with pregabalin and placebo, respectively, reported ≥30% improvement in DPRS scores (P = 0.04). Treatment with pregabalin also resulted in significant efficacy compared with that of placebo on secondary measures, including SF-MPQ VAS score (P = 0.012), SF-MPQ present pain intensity index score (P = 0.003), sleep interference score (P = 0.023), and PGIC and CGIC scores (P = 0.004 and P = 0.001, respectively). Adverse events were observed in 50.0% of pregabalin patients and 40.2% of placebo patients (P = 0.105), with the most common adverse event being dizziness (11.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Study results suggest that relative to placebo, pregabalin in daily doses of 150 to 600 mg/d was effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe DPN or PHN, indicated through improved pain scores and PGIC scores.

Cellular and molecular insights into neuropathy-induced pain hypersensitivity for mechanism-based treatment approaches

Neuropathic pain is currently being treated by a range of therapeutic interventions that above all act to lower neuronal activity in the somatosensory system (e.g. using local anesthetics, calcium channel blockers, and opioids). The present review highlights novel and often still largely experimental treatment approaches based on insights into pathological mechanisms, which impact on the spinal nociceptive network, thereby opening the 'gate' to higher brain centers involved in the perception of pain. Cellular and molecular mechanisms such as ectopia, sensitization of nociceptors, phenotypic switching, structural plasticity, disinhibition, and neuroinflammation are discussed in relation to their involvement in pain hypersensitivity following either peripheral neuropathies or spinal cord injury. A mechanism-based treatment approach may prove to be successful in effective treatment of neuropathic pain, but requires more detailed insights into the persistence of cellular and molecular pain mechanisms which renders neuropathic pain unremitting. Subsequently, identification of the therapeutic window-of-opportunities for each specific intervention in the particular peripheral and/or central neuropathy is essential for successful clinical trials. Most of the cellular and molecular pain mechanisms described in the present review suggest pharmacological interference for neuropathic pain management. However, also more invasive treatment approaches belong to current and/or future options such as neuromodulatory interventions (including spinal cord stimulation) and cell or gene therapies, respectively.

Antinociceptive effects of combination of tramadol and acetaminophen on painful diabetic neuropathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to establish the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic model with rats and investigate the antinociceptive effect of combination of Tramadol (TR) and Acetaminophen (NAPA) on the animal model for the first time.

METHODS

Diabetic model was induced by a single injection of STZ (60 mg/kg, intraperitoneal). Nociceptive thresholds were measured by means of electronic von Frey test, hot-plate test, and tail-flick test. On the 28th day of diabetes induction, diabetic rats with significant hyperalgesia were randomly divided into three groups: TR, NAPA, and TR-NAPA combination group. Each group was randomly divided into four subgroups. Three geometric series of drugs were given to each group respectively. Antinociceptive effects of the drugs were assessed at 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after drug administration. 50% Maximum antinociceptive effect of each drug was determined by probit analysis, whereas interaction between TR and NAPA was evaluated by isobolographic analysis.

RESULTS

Hyperalgesia, along with hyperglycemia, developed 4 days after STZ injection and persisted at all tested time points until 28 days. TR, NAPA, and TR-NAPA combination administration all produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects. Isobolographic analysis showed a significant deviation of TR/NAPA 50% maximum antinociceptive effect (in tail-flick test, but not in von Frey test) from the additive line.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of the two drugs produces an additive antinociceptive effect in tail-flick test, whereas probable additive antinociceptive effect in von Frey test in painful diabetic neuropathy rats.

Increased presynaptic and postsynaptic α2-adrenoceptor activity in the spinal dorsal horn in painful diabetic neuropathy

Diabetic neuropathy is a common cause of chronic pain that is not adequately relieved by conventional analgesics. The α(2)-adrenoceptors are involved in the regulation of glutamatergic input and nociceptive transmission in the spinal dorsal horn, but their functional changes in diabetic neuropathy are not clear. The purpose of the present study was to determine the plasticity of presynaptic and postsynaptic α(2)-adrenoceptors in the control of spinal glutamatergic synaptic transmission in painful diabetic neuropathy. Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings of lamina II neurons were performed in spinal cord slices from streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. The amplitude of glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked from the dorsal root and the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs (sEPSCs) were significantly higher in diabetic than vehicle-control rats. The specific α(2)-adrenoceptor agonist 5-bromo-6-(2-imidazolin-2-ylamino)quinoxaline (UK-14304) (0.1-2 μM) inhibited the frequency of sEPSCs more in diabetic than vehicle-treated rats. UK-14304 also inhibited the amplitude of evoked monosynaptic and polysynaptic EPSCs more in diabetic than control rats. Furthermore, the amplitude of postsynaptic G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K(+) channel (GIRK) currents elicited by UK-14304 was significantly larger in the diabetic group than in the control group. In addition, intrathecal administration of UK-14304 increased the nociceptive threshold more in diabetic than vehicle-control rats. Our findings suggest that diabetic neuropathy increases the activity of presynaptic and postsynaptic α(2)-adrenoceptors to attenuate glutamatergic transmission in the spinal dorsal horn, which accounts for the potentiated antinociceptive effect of α(2)-adrenoceptor activation in diabetic neuropathic pain.

The antinociceptive and antihyperalgesic effect of tapentadol is partially retained in OPRM1 (μ-opioid receptor) knockout mice

Activation of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (NRI) are well recognized as analgesic principles in acute and chronic pain indications. The novel analgesic tapentadol combines MOR agonism and NRI in a single molecule. The present study used OPRM1 (MOR) knockout (KO) mice to determine the relative contribution of MOR activation to tapentadol-induced analgesia in models of acute (nociceptive) and chronic (neuropathic) pain. Antinociceptive efficacy was inferred from paw withdrawal latencies on a 48 °C hot plate in naive animals. Antihyperalgesic efficacy was inferred from the number of nocifensive reactions in diabetic animals (streptozotocin-induced) and non-diabetic controls on a 50 °C hot plate. The effect of tapentadol (0.316-31.6 mg/kg IP) and the MOR agonist morphine (3-10 mg/kg IP) was determined in OPRM1 KO- and congenic wildtype mice. At baseline, diabetic OPRM1 KO mice showed reduced nocifensive reactions as compared to diabetic wildtype mice. In both pain models, morphine and tapentadol were effective in wildtype mice. In the KO mice, however, morphine failed to produce analgesia in either model. On the other hand, tapentadol still had clear effects, and when tested at a dose that was fully efficacious in wildtype mice, showed reduced but still significant antinociceptive efficacy in non-diabetic, and antihyperalgesic efficacy in diabetic OPRM1 KO mice. The remaining antinociceptive activity of tapentadol in OPRM1 KO mice was abolished by the α₂-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine. In OPRM1 wildtype mice, the antihyperalgesic effect of tapentadol was 10 times more potent in diabetic animals (ED₅₀=1.10 mg/kg) than its antinociceptive effect in naïve animals (ED₅₀=10.8 mg/kg). This study supports the conclusion that the analgesic effect of tapentadol is only partly due to the activation of MOR, both under acute and chronic pain conditions, and that the efficacy of tapentadol against acute and chronic pain is based on its combined mechanism of action.

Evaluation of PMI-5011, an ethanolic extract of Artemisia dracunculus L., on peripheral neuropathy in streptozotocin-diabetic mice

We previously reported that PMI-5011, an ethanolic extract of Artemisia dracunculus L., alleviates peripheral neuropathy in high fat diet-fed mice, a model of prediabetes and obesity developing oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory changes in the peripheral nervous system. This study evaluated PMI-5011 on established functional, structural, and biochemical changes associated with Type I diabetic peripheral neuropathy. C57Bl6/J mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes of a 12-week duration, developed motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity deficits, thermal and mechanical hypoalgesia, tactile allodynia, and intra-epidermal nerve fiber loss. PMI-5011 (500 mg/kg/day for 7 weeks) alleviated diabetes-induced nerve conduction slowing, small sensory nerve fiber dysfunction, and increased intra-epidermal nerve fiber density. PMI-5011 blunted sciatic nerve and spinal cord 12/15-lipoxygenase activation and oxidative-nitrosative stress, without ameliorating hyperglycemia or reducing sciatic nerve sorbitol pathway intermediate accumulation. In conclusion, PMI-5011, a safe and non-toxic botanical extract, may find use in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Safety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) may not be adequately managed with available therapeutic options. This phase III, randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of tapentadol extended release (ER) for relieving painful DPN.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients (n = 588) with at least a 3-month history of opioid and/or non-opioid analgesic use for DPN, dissatisfaction with current treatment, and an average pain intensity score of at least 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0 = 'no pain,' 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine') were titrated to an optimal dose of tapentadol ER (100-250 mg bid) during a 3-week open-label phase. Subsequently, patients (n = 395) with at least a 1-point reduction in pain intensity were randomized 1:1 to receive placebo or the optimal fixed dose of tapentadol ER determined during the open-label phase for a 12-week double-blind phase.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00455520.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy outcome was the change in average pain intensity from randomization, determined by twice-daily NRS measurements. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

The least-squares mean difference between groups in the change in average pain intensity from the start of double-blind treatment to week 12 was -1.3 (95% confidence interval, -1.70 to -0.92; p < 0.001, tapentadol ER vs. placebo). A total of 60.5% (356/588) of patients reported at least a 30% improvement in pain intensity from the start to the end of the open-label titration phase; of the patients who were randomized to tapentadol ER, 53.6% (105/196) reported at least a 30% improvement from pre-titration to week 12 of the double-blind phase. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred during double-blind treatment with tapentadol ER included nausea, anxiety, diarrhea, and dizziness. Potential limitations of this study are related to the enriched enrollment randomized-withdrawal trial design, which may result in a more homogeneous patient population during double-blind treatment and may present a risk of unblinding because of changes in side effects from the open-label to the double-blind phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, tapentadol ER 100-250 mg bid provided a statistically significant difference in the maintenance of a clinically important improvement in pain 1 , 2 and was well-tolerated by patients with painful DPN.

Duloxetine in the treatment of chronic pain due to fibromyalgia and diabetic neuropathy

Duloxetine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of fibromyalgia and painful diabetic neuropathy at doses of 60 mg daily. Duloxetine has been shown to significantly improve the symptoms of chronic pain associated with these disorders, as measured by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory scores, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and other various outcome measures in several placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies. Symptom improvement generally began within the first few weeks, and continued for the duration of the study. In addition, the efficacy of duloxetine was found to be due to direct effects on pain symptoms rather than secondary to improvements in depression or anxiety. Adverse events including nausea, constipation, dry mouth, and insomnia, were mild and transient and occurred at relatively low rates. In conclusion, duloxetine, a selective inhibitor for the serotonin and norepinephrine transporters, is efficacious in the treatment of chronic pain associated with fibromyalgia or diabetic neuropathy, and has a predictable tolerability profile, with adverse events generally being mild to moderate.

Local anesthetic sciatic nerve block and nerve fiber damage in diabetic rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A concern for anesthesiologists is whether local anesthetics are more toxic to peripheral nerves in diabetic patients. A previous study in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats showed that larger doses of lidocaine produce moderate nerve injury after nerve block in normal rats and worse injury in diabetic rats. However, it is not clear whether a smaller local anesthetic dose that produces negligible nerve fiber damage in normal rats will produce significant nerve damage in diabetic rats and if adding adjuvant drugs modulates this effect.

METHODS

Rats were intravenously injected with 50 mg/kg streptozotocin to induce diabetes (blood glucose levels 9250 mg/dL) and diabetic neuropathy. After waiting 35 days, an injection (0.1 mL) of 1% lidocaine alone, or with 5 kg/mL epinephrine or 7.5 kg/mL clonidine added, or 0.5% ropivacaine alone was performed at the left sciatic notch in both diabetic and nondiabetic rats. The duration of sensory (pin prick) and motor (toe spreading reflex) nerve block in the hind paws was determined.For histologic controls, all rats also received saline vehicle injection into the right sciatic notch. Another group of uninjected rats was used as naive controls. Left and right nerves were removed 2 days after injection and fixed in situ with a 4% glutaraldehyde solution. Myelinated axon profiles suggestive of neuropathy (myelin figures, pale and swollen,or dark-staining axoplasm) were counted and expressed as a percentage of the total number of fibers in each rat sciatic nerve.

RESULTS

All streptozotocin-injected rats became diabetic and had pronounced tactile allodynia. All rats had sensory and motor nerve blocks lasting for at least 50 mins after injection of local anesthetic. The duration of sensory and motor nerve block was longer in diabetic rats than in nondiabetic rats for all drug groups tested. None of the sciatic nerves examined showed greater than 3% nerve fiber degeneration. Although lidocaine in diabetic rats did not produce nerve fiber damage,diabetic rats receiving lidocaine/clonidine or ropivacaine had more abnormal myelinated axon profiles than did nondiabetic rats receiving the same drug.

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of sciatic nerve block with local anesthetics is longer in diabetic compared with nondiabetic rats. A small, but statistically significant, increase in nerve damage occurred in diabetic rats after nerve block with ropivacaine alone or when duration of lidocaine block was extended with clonidine. These findings may have implications for dosing of local anesthetics in diabetic patients undergoing regional analgesia with nerve blocks.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen combination therapy and gabapentin in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy

AIMS

This study compared the efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen (T/A) and gabapentin in the management of painful diabetic neuropathy.

METHODS

An open, randomized, comparative study was conducted. Subjects with painful symmetric neuropathy in the lower limbs and mean pain-intensity score > or = 4 on a numeric rating scale were eligible. Subjects were randomized to receive either tramadol (37.5 mg)/acetaminophen (325 mg) or gabapentin (300 mg) for 6 weeks. After 2 weeks of the titration period (1200 mg/day for gabapentin and three tablets/day for T/A), the doses were maintained if the pain was relieved. The primary efficacy outcome was a reduction in pain intensity. Secondary measures evaluated a pain relief scale, a Brief Pain Inventory, a 36-item Short Form Health Survey, average pain intensity and sleep disturbance.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-three subjects (T/A 79; gabapentin 84) were included. At the final visit, the mean doses were 1575 mg/day for gabapentin and 4.22 tablets/day for T/A. Both groups were similar in terms of baseline pain intensity (mean intensity: T/A 6.7 +/- 1.6; gabapentin 6.3 +/- 1.6, P = 0.168). At the final visit, the mean reductions in pain intensity were similar in both groups (T/A -3.1 +/- 2.0; gabapentin -2.7 +/- 2.1, P = 0.744). Both groups had similar improvements in every Short Form Health Survey category and Brief Pain Inventory subcategory, and in the mean pain relief scores.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the T/A combination treatment is as effective as gabapentin in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Emerging drugs for diabetic neuropathy

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a very common and disabling diabetes-related complication. DN is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) can be painful in the earlier stages of the disease before becoming painless. Most of the currently available therapies are symptomatic (focusing on pain relief) rather than disease-modifying. With the exception of good glycemic control, there is currently no effective treatment to slow the progression of or reverse DPN.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

In this article, we review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, currently available and future treatments for DPN, and the potential development issues/challenges related to such new therapies. Literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline and Pharmaprojects from 1950 onwards. Search terms include a combination of terms such as diabetic neuropathy, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, mechanisms, treatment, therapy, oxidative/nitrosative stress, anti-oxidants, serotonin, nitrotyrosine, protein kinase C, aldose reductase, sodium channels, taurine, lipoic acid and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain an overview of the epidemiology, clinical features and risk factors of DN. In addition, the reader will have a better understanding of the mechanisms that underpin the development of DPN and their relationships to the current and future therapies. The reader will also develop an insight into the limitations of the current approach to DPN treatment and the potential avenues for future research.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

DN is a very common and disabling complication that currently has no effective treatments other than diabetes control. The pathogenesis of DPN is complex and multi-factorial. Several disease-modifying and symptomatic treatments are currently under development. Oxidative and nitrosative stress have been identified as key pathogenic factors in the development of DPN and new treatments target these pathways and/or their downstream consequences. Gene therapy and growth factors have also emerged as potential new therapies that target particular cellular compartments as opposed to being delivered systemically. The recognition of the difficulty in reversing established DN has focused efforts on slowing its progression.

New therapeutic and biomarker discovery for peripheral diabetic neuropathy: PARP inhibitor, nitrotyrosine, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}

This study evaluated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition as a new therapeutic approach for peripheral diabetic neuropathy using clinically relevant animal model and endpoints, and nitrotyrosine (NT), TNF-alpha, and nitrite/nitrate as potential biomarkers of the disease. Control and streptozotocin-diabetic rats were maintained with or without treatment with orally active PARP inhibitor 10-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-ylmethyl)-2H-7-oxa-1,2-diaza-benzo[de]anthracen-3-one (GPI-15,427), 30 mg kg(-1) d(-1), for 10 wk after first 2 wk without treatment. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated protein expression (Western blot analysis), motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities, and tibial nerve morphometry. Sciatic nerve and spinal cord NT, TNF-alpha, and nitrite/nitrate concentrations were measured by ELISA. NT localization in peripheral nervous system was evaluated by double-label fluorescent immunohistochemistry. A PARP inhibitor treatment counteracted diabetes-induced motor and sensory nerve conduction slowing, axonal atrophy of large myelinated fibers, and increase in sciatic nerve and spinal cord NT and TNF-alpha concentrations. Sciatic nerve NT and TNF-alpha concentrations inversely correlated with motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities and myelin thickness, whereas nitrite/nitrate concentrations were indistinguishable between control and diabetic groups. NT accumulation was identified in endothelial and Schwann cells of the peripheral nerve, neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes of the spinal cord, and neurons and glial cells of the dorsal root ganglia. The findings identify PARP as a compelling drug target for prevention and treatment of both functional and structural manifestations of peripheral diabetic neuropathy and provide rationale for detailed evaluation of NT and TNF-alpha as potential biomarkers of its presence, severity, and progression.

Utility of the cutaneous silent period in patients with diabetes mellitus

We performed this study to evaluate whether or not the cutaneous silent period (CSP) is a useful metric to identify small-fiber neuropathy in diabetic patients. The CSP was measured from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle in 30 healthy controls and 110 diabetic patients, who in turn were divided into 3 subgroups (patients with large-fiber neuropathy, patients with small-fiber neuropathy, and asymptomatic patients). The measured CSP and clinical characteristics were compared among the groups. The power of the CSP in discriminating patients from controls and any correlation with other clinical variables were analyzed. Each patient subgroup had a significantly delayed CSP latency compared to the controls. The latency of patients with large-fiber neuropathy was also significantly prolonged compared to the other subgroups of patients. The CSP latency was the only variable to discriminate patients. The latency showed a significant correlation with the late responses in nerve conduction studies. Thus, the CSP latency may be a useful tool in evaluating small neural fiber function in diabetic patients.

High-fat diet-induced neuropathy of prediabetes and obesity: effect of PMI-5011, an ethanolic extract of Artemisia dracunculus L

Artemisia species are a rich source of herbal remedies with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. We evaluated PMI-5011, an ethanolic extract of Artemisia dracunculus L., on neuropathy in high-sfat diet-fed mice, a model of prediabetes and obesity developing oxidative stress and proinflammatory changes in peripheral nervous system. C57Bl6/J mice fed high-fat diet for 16 weeks developed obesity, moderate nonfasting hyperglycemia, nerve conduction deficit, thermal and mechanical hypoalgesia, and tactile allodynia. They displayed 12/15-lipoxygenase overexpression, 12(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid accumulation, and nitrosative stress in peripheral nerve and spinal cord. PMI-5011 (500 mgkg⁻¹d⁻¹, 7 weeks) normalized glycemia, alleviated nerve conduction slowing and sensory neuropathy, and reduced 12/15-lipoxygenase upregulation and nitrated protein expression in peripheral nervous system. PMI-5011, a safe and nontoxic botanical extract, may find use in treatment of neuropathic changes at the earliest stage of disease.

Long-term pain in cats: how much do we know about this important welfare issue?

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE

Long-term pain in cats is an important welfare issue but is often overlooked and undertreated.

AUDIENCE

All practitioners are faced with cats that require analgesic intervention to improve their quality of life.

PATIENT GROUP

Any cat may potentially experience long-term pain and discomfort. Degenerative joint disease and diabetic-related pain is more common in middle-aged or older individuals, whereas persistent postsurgical pain can occur at any age and is seen in young cats following onychectomy.

EVIDENCE BASE

Robust evidence on long-term pain issues in cats - specifically, relating to prevalence, etiology, and treatment protocols and outcomes - is missing from the veterinary literature. The aim of this review is to summarise the current state of knowledge. In doing so, it takes a practical approach, highlighting the obvious, and some not so obvious, causes of long-term pain in cats; some aspects that warrant closer attention; our ability to recognize pain and monitor how this impacts on quality of life; and today's treatment options.

Prevalence of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy among patients suffering from diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in adult patients with diabetes mellitus (type 1 and 2) attending outpatient clinics in Saudi Arabia and to determine the demographic profile and pharmaceutical management of these patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eligible patients from 100 outpatient clinics treating patients with diabetes mellitus across Saudi Arabia completed an epidemiologic questionnaire to obtain demographic information and medication history. Following this, the validated DN4 pain questionnaire was used to identify the presence of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (score of > or =4).

RESULTS

A total of 1039 patients were enrolled. Following the DN4 pain questionnaire, an overall prevalence of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy of 65.3% (n = 678) was found. The age of patients, their sex, and the duration of underlying diabetes were found to be statistically significant factors in the development of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. No statistically significant difference was found between smoking history, body mass index, or racial origin and presence of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. On initial evaluation, 42.3% (n = 440) stated they were receiving treatment for pain. Following evaluation using the DN4 pain questionnaire, the number prescribed therapeutic pain management increased to more than two thirds (68.7%, n = 714) of which 62.3% (n = 579) were prescribed pregabalin.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with reduced pain intensity DN4 has not been directly compared with other tools to measure neuropathic pain; however, using the DN4 in this study 65.3% of adult outpatients with type 1 and 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia were found to have painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy; far higher than anticipated.

Tapentadol immediate release for the relief of moderate-to-severe acute pain

Tapentadol is a novel, centrally acting analgesic with two mechanisms of action: micro-opioid receptor agonism and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. It has demonstrated broad analgesic efficacy across multiple pain models. This article reviews the clinical development of tapentadol immediate release (IR), including results from Phase II and III clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of tapentadol IR in patients with moderate-to-severe acute pain. In clinical studies in patients with moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain, osteoarthritis pain and/or low back pain, tapentadol IR 50, 75 or 100 mg every 4 - 6 h has demonstrated analgesic efficacy similar to that observed with the micro-opioid receptor agonist oxycodone HCl IR 10 or 15 mg every 4 - 6 h. However, at doses providing comparable analgesic efficacy, tapentadol IR has been associated with significantly lower incidences of nausea and/or vomiting and constipation, and a significantly lower rate of treatment discontinuation compared with oxycodone IR. The observed efficacy across different pain models and favorable gastrointestinal tolerability profile associated with tapentadol IR indicate that this novel analgesic is an attractive treatment option for the relief of moderate-to-severe acute pain.

Abnormal calcium homeostasis in peripheral neuropathies

Abnormal neuronal calcium (Ca2+) homeostasis has been implicated in numerous diseases of the nervous system. The pathogenesis of two increasingly common disorders of the peripheral nervous system, namely neuropathic pain and diabetic polyneuropathy, has been associated with aberrant Ca2+ channel expression and function. Here we review the current state of knowledge regarding the role of Ca2+ dyshomeostasis and associated mitochondrial dysfunction in painful and diabetic neuropathies. The central impact of both alterations of Ca2+ signalling at the plasma membrane and also intracellular Ca2+ handling on sensory neurone function is discussed and related to abnormal endoplasmic reticulum performance. We also present new data highlighting sub-optimal axonal Ca2+ signalling in diabetic neuropathy and discuss the putative role for this abnormality in the induction of axonal degeneration in peripheral neuropathies. The accumulating evidence implicating Ca2+ dysregulation in both painful and degenerative neuropathies, along with recent advances in understanding of regional variations in Ca2+ channel and pump structures, makes modulation of neuronal Ca2+ handling an increasingly viable approach for therapeutic interventions against the painful and degenerative aspects of many peripheral neuropathies.

Tapentadol, but not morphine, selectively inhibits disease-related thermal hyperalgesia in a mouse model of diabetic neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain in diabetic patients is a common distressing symptom and remains a challenge for analgesic treatment. Selective inhibition of pathological pain sensation without modification of normal sensory function is a primary aim of analgesic treatment in chronic neuropathic pain. Tapentadol is a novel analgesic with two modes of action, mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonism and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibition. Mice were rendered diabetic by means of streptozotocin, and neuropathic hyperalgesia was assessed in a 50 degrees C hot plate test. Normal nociception was determined in control mice. Tapentadol (0.1-1mg/kg i.v.) and morphine (0.1-3.16 mg/kg i.v.) dose-dependently attenuated heat-induced nociception in diabetic animals with full efficacy, reaching >80% at the highest doses tested. Tapentadol was more potent than morphine against heat hyperalgesia, with ED(50) (minimal effective dose) values of 0.32 (0.316) and 0.65 (1)mg/kg, respectively. Non-diabetic controls did not show significant anti-nociception with tapentadol up to the highest dose tested (1mg/kg). In contrast, 3.16 mg/kg morphine, the dose that resulted in full anti-hyperalgesic efficacy under diabetic conditions, produced significant anti-nociception in non-diabetic controls. Selective inhibition of disease-related hyperalgesia by tapentadol suggests a possible advantage in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain when compared with classical opioids, such as morphine. It is hypothesized that this superior efficacy profile of tapentadol is due to simultaneous activation of MOR and inhibition of NA reuptake.

Microvascular dysfunction in diabetic foot disease and ulceration

Diabetic foot disease and ulceration is a major complication that may lead to the amputation of the lower limbs. Microangiopathy may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of tissue breakdown in the diabetic foot. However, the precise mechanisms of this process remain unclear and poorly understood. Microvasculature in the skin is comprised of nutritive capillaries and thermoregulatory arteriovenous shunt flow. It is regulated through the complex interaction of neurogenic and neurovascular control. The interplay among endothelial dysfunction, impaired nerve axon reflex activities, and microvascular regulation in the diabetic patient results in the poor healing of wounds. Skin microvasculature undergoes both morphologic changes as well as functional deficits when parts of the body come under stress or injury. Two important theories that have been put forward to explain the abnormalities that have been observed are the haemodynamic hypothesis and capillary steal syndrome. With advances in medical technology, microvasculature can now be measured quantitatively. This article reviews the development of microvascular dysfunction in the diabetic foot and discusses how it may relate to the pathogenesis of diabetic foot problems and ulceration. Common methods for measuring skin microcirculation are also discussed.

Diabetic painful and insensate neuropathy: pathogenesis and potential treatments

Advanced peripheral diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is associated with elevated vibration and thermal perception thresholds that progress to sensory loss and degeneration of all fiber types in peripheral nerve. A considerable proportion of diabetic patients also describe abnormal sensations such as paresthesias, allodynia, hyperalgesia, and spontaneous pain. One or several manifestations of abnormal sensation and pain are described in all the diabetic rat and mouse models studied so far (i.e., streptozotocin-diabetic rats and mice, type 1 insulinopenic BB/Wor and type 2 hyperinsulinemic diabetic BBZDR/Wor rats, Zucker diabetic fatty rats, and nonobese diabetic, Akita, leptin- and leptin-receptor-deficient, and high-fat diet-fed mice). Such manifestations are 1) thermal hyperalgesia, an equivalent of a clinical phenomenon described in early PDN; 2) thermal hypoalgesia, typically present in advanced PDN; 3) mechanical hyperalgesia, an equivalent of pain on pressure in early PDN; 4) mechanical hypoalgesia, an equivalent to the loss of sensitivity to mechanical noxious stimuli in advanced PDN; 5) tactile allodynia, a painful perception of a light touch; and 5) formalin-induced hyperalgesia. Rats with short-term diabetes develop painful neuropathy, whereas those with longer-term diabetes and diabetic mice typically display manifestations of both painful and insensate neuropathy, or insensate neuropathy only. Animal studies using pharmacological and genetic approaches revealed important roles of increased aldose reductase, protein kinase C, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activities, advanced glycation end-products and their receptors, oxidative-nitrosative stress, growth factor imbalances, and C-peptide deficiency in both painful and insensate neuropathy. This review describes recent achievements in studying the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathic pain and sensory disorders in diabetic animal models and developing potential pathogenetic treatments.

5% lidocaine medicated plaster versus pregabalin in post-herpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy: an open-label, non-inferiority two-stage RCT study

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster with pregabalin in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) or painful diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a two-stage adaptive, randomized, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority study. Data are reported from the initial 4-week comparative phase, in which adults with PHN or painful DPN received either topical 5% lidocaine medicated plaster applied to the most painful skin area or twice-daily pregabalin capsules titrated to effect according to the Summary of Product Characteristics. The primary endpoint was response rate at 4 weeks, defined as reduction averaged over the last three days from baseline of > or = 2 points or an absolute value of < or = 4 points on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-3). Secondary endpoints included 30% and 50% reductions in NRS-3 scores; change in allodynia severity rating; quality of life (QoL) parameters EQ-5D, CGIC, and PGIC; patient satisfaction with treatment; and evaluation of safety (laboratory parameters, vital signs, physical examinations, adverse events [AEs], drug-related AEs [DRAEs], and withdrawal due to AEs).

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients with PHN and 204 with painful DPN were analysed (full analysis set, FAS). Overall, 66.4% of patients treated with the 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and 61.5% receiving pregabalin were considered responders (corresponding numbers for the per protocol set, PPS: 65.3% vs. 62.0%). In PHN more patients responded to 5% lidocaine medicated plaster treatment than to pregabalin (PPS: 62.2% vs. 46.5%), while response was comparable for patients with painful DPN (PPS: 66.7% vs 69.1%). 30% and 50% reductions in NRS-3 scores were greater with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster than with pregabalin. Both treatments reduced allodynia severity. 5% lidocaine medicated plaster showed greater improvements in QoL based on EQ-5D in both PHN and DPN. PGIC and CGIC scores indicated greater improvement for 5% lidocaine medicated plaster treated patients with PHN. Improvements were comparable between treatments in painful DPN. Fewer patients administering 5% lidocaine medicated plaster experienced AEs (safety set, SAF: 18.7% vs. 46.4%), DRAEs (5.8% vs. 41.2%) and related discontinuations compared to patients taking pregabalin.

CONCLUSION

5% lidocaine medicated plaster showed better efficacy compared with pregabalin in patients with PHN. Within DPN, efficacy was comparable for both treatments. 5% lidocaine medicated plaster showed a favourable efficacy/safety profile with greater improvements in patient satisfaction and QoL compared with pregabalin for both indications, supporting its first line position in the treatment of localized neuropathic pain.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and pregabalin in post-herpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

Neuropathic pain is often difficult to treat due to a complex pathophysiology. This study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability and safety of combination therapy with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and pregabalin for neuropathic pain in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) or painful diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN).

METHODS

Patients completing 4-week monotherapy with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster or pregabalin were enrolled in an 8-week combination phase. Patients with adequate response to monotherapy (recalled average pain intensity of 4 or less on 11-point numeric rating scale in the previous 3 days [NRS-3 score]) continued their previous therapy, whereas those with insufficient response received combination therapy. Efficacy endpoints included change in NRS-3 from combination phase baseline, Patient and Clinical Global Impression of Change (PGIC/CGIC), and patient's satisfaction with treatment. Safety evaluation included adverse events (AEs), drug-related AEs (DRAEs), and withdrawal due to AEs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT No. 2006-003132-29.

RESULTS

Of 229 patients in the per-protocol set (PPS: 68 PHN and 161 DPN), 71 received 5% lidocaine medicated plaster monotherapy, 57 had pregabalin added to 5% lidocaine medicated plaster, 57 pregabalin monotherapy and 44 received 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in addition to continued pregabalin treatment. There were no meaningful differences in demographic data between the treatment groups. Patients continuing on monotherapy demonstrated additional decreases in NRS-3 scores. Patients receiving combination therapy achieved clinically relevant reduction in NRS-3 values in addition to improvement achieved during the 4 weeks of monotherapy. Improvement was similar between the two combination therapy groups. Considerable improvements in patients' treatment satisfaction were reported. Incidences of AEs were in line with previous reports for the two treatments and combination therapy was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PHN and painful DPN failing to respond to monotherapy, combination therapy with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and pregabalin provides additional clinically relevant pain relief and is safe and well-tolerated.

Microneurographic findings of relevance to pain in patients with erythromelalgia and patients with diabetic neuropathy

Mechanisms responsible for neuropathic pain are still unclear. By using microneurography we have been able to record from single C-nociceptive and sympathetic fibers in patients and attempted to uncover possible abnormal functional properties of these fibers of relevance for pain. In two previously published studies conducted on patients with erythromelalgia and patients with diabetic neuropathy, some of the major findings were: (1) spontaneous activity in nociceptive fibers, (2) sensitization of mechano-insensitive C-fibers, and (3) an altered distribution of C-afferent nerve fibers with a reversal of the proportion of the two main subtypes of C-nociceptive fibers, indicating a loss of function of polymodal nociceptors. Although some degree of spontaneous activity and sensitization also was found in patients without pain, these mechanisms may still be of importance for the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain. A change in the distribution of C-nociceptive fibers in the skin as shown in the patients with diabetic neuropathy may help to reveal mechanisms responsible for small-fiber dysfunction.

Efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster in comparison with pregabalin in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy: interim analysis from an open-label, two-stage adaptive, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) are two common causes of peripheral neuropathic pain. Typical localized symptoms can include burning sensations or intermittent shooting or stabbing pains with or without allodynia. Evidence-based treatment guidelines recommend the 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster or pregabalin as first-line therapy for relief of peripheral neuropathic pain. This study aimed to compare 5% lidocaine medicated plaster treatment with pregabalin in patients with PHN and patients with DPN.

METHODS

The study was a two-stage, adaptive, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicentre trial that incorporated a drug wash-out phase of up to 2 weeks prior to the start of the comparative phase. At the end of the enrollment phase, patients who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were randomized to either 5% lidocaine medicated plaster or pregabalin treatment and entered the 4-week comparative phase. The interim analysis represents the first stage of the two-stage adaptive trial design and was planned to include data from the comparative phase for the first 150 randomized patients of the 300 total planned for the trial. Patients aged > or = 18 years with PHN or DPN were recruited from 53 investigational centres in 14 European countries. For this interim analysis, 55 patients with PHN and 91 with DPN (full-analysis set [FAS]), randomly assigned to the treatment groups, were available for analysis. Topical 5% lidocaine medicated plaster treatment was administered by patients to the area of most painful skin. A maximum of three or four plasters were applied for up to 12 hours within each 24-hour period in patients with PHN or DPN, respectively. Pregabalin capsules were administered orally, twice daily. The dose was titrated to effect: all patients received 150 mg/day in the first week and 300 mg/day in the second week of treatment. After 1 week at 300 mg/day, the dose of pregabalin was further increased to 600 mg/day in patients with high pain intensity scores. The pre-planned primary study endpoint was the rate of treatment responders, defined as completing patients experiencing a reduction from baseline of > or = 2 points or an absolute value of < or = 4 points on the 11-item numerical rating scale of recalled average pain intensity over the last 3 days (NRS-3), after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included > or = 30% and > or = 50% reductions in NRS-3 scores, changes in neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) scores and allodynia severity ratings. Overall, 65.3% of patients treated with the 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and 62.0% receiving pregabalin responded to treatment with respect to the primary endpoint. A higher proportion of PHN patients responded to plaster treatment compared with pregabalin (63.0% vs 37.5%), whereas in the larger DPN group treatments were comparable. Both treatments improved NPSI scores and reduced allodynia severity. Patients administering lidocaine plaster experienced fewer drug-related adverse events (3.9% vs 39.2%) and there were substantially fewer discontinuations due to drug-related adverse events (1.3% vs 20.3%).

CONCLUSION

After 4 weeks, 5% lidocaine medicated plaster treatment was associated with similar levels of analgesia in patients with PHN or DPN but substantially fewer frequent adverse events than pregabalin.

Management of diabetic neuropathy by sodium valproate and glyceryl trinitrate spray: a prospective double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action helps in achieving synergistic analgesic effect in neuropathic pain. Keeping this point in view, the effect and safety aspects of sodium valproate and GTN were assessed alone as well as in combination in this study.

DESIGN

Prospective double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Eighty-seven type 2 diabetics with painful neuropathy were enrolled. Four were excluded: three with HbA1c>11 while one withdrew consent. The remaining 83 were given either sodium valproate and GTN spray (group A) or placebo drug and GTN spray (group B) or sodium valproate and placebo spray (group C) or placebo drug and placebo spray (group D). Quantitative assessment of pain was done by McGill pain questionnaire, visual analogue score (VAS) and present pain intensity (PPI) at the beginning of the study and after 3 months along with motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities measurements.

RESULTS

All the three treatment groups experienced significant improvement in pain score in their drug phase of trial (p<0.001/<0.05) along with some of the electrophysiological parameters. The assessment of the magnitude of therapeutic effect of sodium valproate, GTN and their combination gave numbers needed to treat (NNT) of 7, 5 and 4, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Sodium valproate and GTN are well tolerated and provide significant improvement in pain scores as well as in electrophysiological parameters.

Management of painful diabetic neuropathy

The commonest cause of peripheral neuropathy is diabetes and pain occurs in approximately 30% of diabetic patients with neuropathy. It is extremely distressing for the patient and poses significant difficulties in management, as no treatment to date provides total relief and the side effects of therapy limit dose titration. Understanding the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy may lead to the development of new treatments for preventing nerve damage. Furthermore, a better understanding of the mechanisms that modulate pain may lead to more effective relief of painful symptoms. This review provides an update on the assessment and treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy.