Complete avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: a randomized trial comparing sirolimus and tacrolimus

Can mTOR inhibitors reduce the risk of late kidney allograft failure?

The most frequent causes of late kidney allograft failure are chronic rejection, nonalloimmune injury and death, all of which may depend on the characteristics of the donor and recipient, but may also be influenced by the type of immunosuppression. Combining calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids offers potent immunosuppression, but may also cause side effects leading to progressive graft dysfunction or an increased risk of death. New immunosuppressive strategies may come from the availability of inhibitors of mTOR, a downstream effector of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase that provides the signal for cell proliferation by phosphorylating a cascade of kinases. Recent trials have shown that it is possible to minimize the dose or withdraw CNIs a few weeks after transplantation when they are combined with mTOR inhibitors and their combination may also make it possible to minimize or avoid the use of corticosteroids. Moreover, by inhibiting the signal for cell proliferation, mTOR inhibitors may reduce the replication of cytomegalovirus inside host cells, prevent transplant vasculopathy, and exert anti-oncogenic activity. All of these characteristics offer a ray of hope for reducing the risk of long-term allograft failure.

[Chronic renal failure and transplantation]

Kidney transplantation is the best option for all patients with terminal renal failure. Kidney transplantation is not only associated with an improved quality of life in comparison to all other renal replacement therapies, this method also offers a significantly extended lifespan. Therefore, the option for transplantation has to be verified for every patient with renal failure. Graft and patient survival is best when transplantation is carried out just before starting dialysis treatment. Realistically, only living donor transplantation offers the option of sparing the recipient a long waiting period on dialysis. Although transplantation from living donors is superior to cadaveric kidney transplantation, a small risk remains for the donor. Kidney transplantation and the immunosuppressive therapy are associated with an increased risk for certain types of infection, an increased tumour risk and an increased risk for cardiovascular complications. To address these problems, specific recommendations for patient surveillance have been provided by different transplantation societies.

Chronic Allograft Nephropathy

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains the Achilles heel of renal transplantation. In spite of the significant strides achieved in one-year renal allograft survival with newer immunosuppressant strategies, the fate of long-term renal allograft survival remains unchanged. The number of renal transplant recipients returning to dialysis has doubled in the past decade. This is especially important since these patients pose a significantly increased likelihood of dying while on the waiting list for retransplantation, due to increasing disparity between donor organ availability versus demand and longer waiting time secondary to heightened immunologic sensitization from their prior transplants. In this review we analyze the latest literature in detail and discuss the definition, natural history, pathophysiology, alloantigen dependent and independent factors that play a crucial role in CAN and the potential newer therapeutic targets on the horizon. This article highlights the importance of early identification and careful management of all the potential contributing factors with particular emphasis on prevention rather than cure of CAN as the core management strategy.

De novo sirolimus-based immunosuppression after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term outcomes and side effects

BACKGROUND

We report long-term outcomes and side effects after transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using de novo, sirolimus-based immunosuppression (IS).

METHODS

A total of 70 patients with HCC (mean age: 54.4+/-7 years, female/male: 12/58) were transplanted and included in the study. Immunosuppression included de novo sirolimus, low-dose calcineurin inhibitor for 6 to 12 months, with short-course (3 months) or no steroids.

RESULTS

After 49 months-median follow-up, eight patients have experienced an HCC recurrence, 2 of 34 when Milan criteria were respected (6%) and 6 of 36 when beyond Milan criteria (17%). One- and 4-year tumor-free survivals were 85 and 73%, when Milan criteria were respected and 82% and 75% when they were not, respectively. (P=0.9). After recurrence, mean survival was 23+/-28 months. Half (35 of 70) of the patients experienced a rejection. Incisional hernia (24 of 70, 34%), wound infection (12 of 70, 17%), anemia (39 of 70, 56%), leucopenia (39 of 70, 56%), high triglyceride (43 of 70, 61%), and cholesterol (28 of 70, 40%) levels and mouth ulcers (20 of 70, 29%) were among the most frequent complications. No hepatic artery thrombosis was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that de novo sirolimus-based immunosuppression is associated with satisfactory outcomes after transplantation, even in selected patients beyond Milan criteria. The protocol has proven safe, with an acceptable side-effect profile. This study supports the conduct of larger randomized trials investigating sirolimus after transplantation for HCC.

Protocol biopsies in renal transplantation: prognostic value of structural monitoring

The natural history of renal allograft damage has been characterized in serial protocol biopsies. The prevalence of subclinical rejection (SCR) is maximal during the first months and it is associated with the progression of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and a decreased graft survival. IF/TA rapidly progress during the first months and constitutes an independent predictor of graft survival. IF/TA associated with transplant vasculopathy, SCR, or transplant glomerulopathy implies a poorer prognosis than IF/TA without additional lesions. These observations suggest that protocol biopsies could be considered a surrogate of graft survival. Preliminary data suggest that the predictive value of protocol biopsies is not inferior to acute rejection or renal function. Additionally, protocol biopsies have been employed as a secondary efficacy variable in clinical trials. This strategy has been useful to demonstrate a decrease in the progression of IF/TA in some calcineurin-free regimens. Quantification of renal damage is associated with graft survival suggesting that quantitative parameters might improve the predictive value of protocol biopsies. Validation of protocol biopsies as a surrogate of graft survival is actively pursued, as the utility of classical surrogates of graft outcome such as acute rejection has become less useful because of its decreased prevalence with actual immunosuppression.

Current concepts and perspectives of immunosuppression in organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

While early surgical success made organ transplantation possible in the 1950s and 1960s, the breakthrough in clinical organ transplantation was achieved through the discovery and invention of modern immunosuppressive agents in the early/mid-1980s. Especially during the 1990 s, a large array of immunosuppressants has expanded the armamentarium used to prevent and treat allograft rejection, resulting in an excellent short-term and an acceptable long-term outcome. However, these drugs have potent but still non-specific immunosuppressive properties and frequently show severe acute and chronic side effects, sometimes questioning the overall success.

CONCEPTS/TRENDS

As the "Holy-Grail" of the transplant community, the induction of "true donor-specific tolerance" has not been achieved yet; current immunosuppressive strategies, in particular in Europe, include "individually tailored immunosuppressive" protocols, mostly based on specific immunologic and non-immunologic risk factors. These protocols allow for optimal immunosuppressive protocols for each patient group according to their needs by choosing the most suitable, well-tolerated combination of agents and the most effective doses to avoid acute rejection episodes (incidence and severity) and minimise drug-related toxicity to reduce long-term drug-related morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, transplant recipient are still being forced to take a life-long course of chemical immunosuppressive agents to keep their graft, knowing about the possible life-threatening side effects.

SUMMARY

We review current trends of immunosuppressive protocols in liver and kidney transplantation, focusing on calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing protocols, mammalian-target-of-rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor based-protocols and corticosteroid-avoidance protocols, being aware of the fact, that most of these strategies could be applicable for other transplanted organs, too. Finally, we describe future trends and new developments that are rising on the horizon.

Diurnal blood pressure changes one year after kidney transplantation: relationship to allograft function, histology, and resistive index

Loss of circadian BP change has been linked to target organ damage and accelerated kidney function loss in hypertensive patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Ambulatory BP-derived data from 119 consecutive kidney transplant recipients who presented for the first annual evaluation were examined in relation to allograft function, histology, and ultrasound findings. A total of 101 (85%) patients were receiving antihypertensive medications (median 2), and 85 (71%) achieved target awake average systolic BP (SBP) of <135 mmHg. A day-night change in SBP by 10% or more (dippers) was detected in 29 (24%). Dipping status was associated with younger recipient age, lack of diabetes, low chronic vascular score, and low resistive index. Nondippers and reverse dippers had lower GFR compared with dippers (P = 0.04). For every 10% nocturnal drop in SBP, GFR increased by 4.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (R = 0.3, P = 0.003). Nondippers and reverse dippers were equally common in recipients with normal histology and in those with pathologic findings on surveillance biopsy. On multivariate analysis, percentage of nocturnal fall in SBP and elevated resistive index independently correlated with GFR. This study indicates that lack of nocturnal fall in SBP is related to poor allograft function, high chronic vascular score, and high resistive index irrespective of allograft fibrosis. Further studies are needed to determine whether restoration of normal BP pattern will confer better allograft outcome.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy risk in kidney transplants: the influence of recipient age and donor gender

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a frequent cause of kidney transplant failure. We determined the risk factors for biopsy-proven PVAN among 1027 recent kidney transplant recipients by univariate and multivariate analyses. The rate of PVAN was determined over an univariate and multivariate analysis over an average of 30 months of follow-up of patients receiving predominantly living donor grafts with antibody induction and sequential surveillance biopsies to detect subclinical graft disease. Seventy-four transplant recipients were diagnosed with PVAN with the finding made on surveillance biopsy in 40 patients. These 40 cases did not differ from the 34 non-surveillance cases with respect to baseline clinical characteristics or initial histological features. Older recipient age and female donor gender were independent risks associated with PVAN. Factors not linked to PVAN risk included the use and type of induction agent, use of tacrolimus vs sirolimus, the number of human lympocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, or the frequency of acute rejection. We conclude that PVAN preferentially affects older age patients and allografts from female donors but is unrelated to immunological risk, choice of immunosuppression, or rejection history.

Stable Kidney Function in the Second Decade After Kidney Transplantation While on Cyclosporine-Based Immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive protocols in kidney transplantation over the past 20 years. However, in some recipients, the adverse effects of CNIs contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy and death with function--the two leading causes of late graft loss. Other recipients maintain stable graft function.

METHODS

We studied the impact of continuing CNI-based immunosuppression in the second decade after kidney transplantation. From 1984 through 1996, a total of 1,263 patients underwent a primary kidney transplant at the University of Minnesota and received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Antibody induction was used only in deceased donor recipients.

RESULTS

The actuarial 20-year patient survival rate was 38%; graft survival, 30%; and death-censored graft survival, 60%. The annual mean serum creatinine level for recipients whose grafts survived > or =1 year remained stable, although recipients with a history of > or =1 acute rejection episode had a higher serum creatinine level vs. recipients who were rejection-free. The annual mean calculated creatinine clearance was also stable over time. In addition, for recipients who were acute rejection-free, chronic allograft nephropathy/chronic rejection was only responsible for 9% of graft losses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that some kidney transplant recipients tolerate long-term CNI-based immunosuppression with stable creatinine levels. Identifying certain recipients' predisposition to CNI toxicity and individualizing immunosuppressive therapy may be important in order to improve long-term kidney function, while simultaneously preserving low short-term acute rejection rates.

Immunosuppression for dual kidney transplantation with marginal organs: the old is better yet

Immunosuppressive protocols in dual kidney transplantation (DKT) are based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). We wonder whether a CNI-free immunosuppression can improve outcome in older patients receiving a DKT with marginal donor organs. Thirty-six were treated with CsA, MMF and prednisone (CsA group) and 42 with rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone (SRL group). Incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection was 44% and 11% in the CsA group, and 40% and 8% in the SRL group. CMV infection incidence was low in both protocols. Three-year patient survival was 89% in the CsA and 76% in the SRL group. One- and 3-year graft survival after censoring for dead with a functioning allograft was 94.2% and 94% in CsA and 95% and 90% in SRL, respectively. Renal function was similar in both groups whereas proteinuria was higher in the SRL group. Uninephrectomy due to graft thrombosis or urinary-related complications was numerically higher in the SRL (21%) than in the CsA group (8%) (p = 0.13) and it was associated with renal failure and proteinuria. In DKT, a new induction immunosuppressive protocol based on rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone does not offer any advantage in comparison to the old CsA, MMF and prednisone.

Mycophenolate mofetil/sirolimus compared to other common immunosuppressive regimens in kidney transplantation

We evaluated outcomes with the sirolimus (SRL) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination regimen (SRL/MMF) in solitary kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2005 reported to the Scientific Registry of Renal Transplant Recipients. Three-and-a-half percent received SRL/MMF (n = 2040). Six-month acute rejection rates were higher with SRL/MMF (SRL/MMF: 16.0% vs. other regimens: 11.2%, p < 0.001). Overall graft survival was significantly lower on SRL/MMF. SRL/MMF was associated with twice the hazard for graft loss (AHR = 2.0, 95% C.I., 1.8, 2.2) relative to TAC/MMF, also consistent in both living donor transplants (AHR = 2.4, 95% C.I., 1.9, 2.9) and expanded criteria donor transplants (AHR = 2.1, 95% C.I., 1.7-2.5). Among deceased donor transplants, DGF rates were higher in the SRL/MMF cohort (47% vs. 27%, p < 0.001). However, adjusted graft survival was also significantly inferior with SRL/MMF in DGF-free patients (AHR = 1.9, 95% C.I., 1.6-2.3). In analyses restricted to patients who remained on the discharge regimen at 6 months posttransplant, conditional graft survival in deceased donor transplants was significantly lower with SRL/MMF compared to patients on TAC/MMF or CsA/MMF regimens at 5 years posttransplant (64%, 78%, 78%, respectively, p = 0.001) and across all patient subgroups. In conclusion, SRL/MMF is associated with inferior renal transplant outcomes compared with other commonly used regimens.

Five-Year Follow-up After Late Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Sirolimus in Patients With Chronic Renal Allograft Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is, among others, caused by nephrotoxic side effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), which are to date still the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy. Sirolimus (SIR), an immunosuppressive compound without effects on glomerular perfusion, has been used in CNI-sparing immunosuppressive protocols. We report the 5-year follow-up of a prospective, controlled conversion study from CNI to SIR in patients with moderately to severely impaired renal function.

METHODS

Twelve renal transplant recipients with moderately to severely impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate of 17 to 35 mL/min according to the MDRD formula), enrolled in a prospective, controlled 1-year pilot study were followed for 5 years.

RESULTS

Three renal grafts (25%) were lost during the 5-year follow-up. Graft loss was due to noncompliance in one patient and to CAN in the other two patients. These two patients returned to dialysis 43 and 59 months after conversion, corresponding to 86 and 75 months after transplantation, respectively. Six of nine patients had a stable or even better renal function compared to the baseline. The lipid profile increased initially, but then remained stable over time.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of immunosuppressive therapy from CNI to SIR in patients with impaired renal function more than 1 year after transplantation is feasible and safe yielding improved renal function in the majority of patients, which was sustained at 5 years follow-up.

Comparison of Low Versus High Tacrolimus Levels in Kidney Transplantation: Assessment of Efficacy by Protocol Biopsies

BACKGROUND

The use of calcineurin inhibitors is generally guided by drug blood levels. However, those levels are chosen based on clinical experience, lacking adequate titration studies.

METHODS

In these analyses, we compared clinical and histologic endpoints in two groups of kidney transplant recipients: in the first (HiTAC, January 2000 to June 2002, n=245) tacrolimus levels were significantly higher than in the second (LoTAC, July 2002 to September 2004, n=330). This change in drug levels (15% reduction) was made in an attempt to reduce the incidence of polyoma virus nephropathy (PVAN). Other immunosuppressive medications were unchanged during these two time periods.

RESULTS

The recipient and donor demographics were not statistically different between the two groups. Compared to HiTAC, at one year posttransplant LoTAC had: 1) lower incidence of PVAN (10.5% vs. 2.5%, P<0.0001); 2) lower fasting glucose levels; 3) higher iothalamate glomerular filtration rate (52+/-19 vs. 59+/-17 ml/min/m, P<0.0001); and 4) on protocol one-year biopsies, lower incidence and severity of interstitial fibrosis (67% vs. 45%, P=0.003) and tubular atrophy (82% vs., 66%, P=0.01). The incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes was similar between both groups (7.8% versus 7.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Modest reductions in tacrolimus exposure early posttransplant are associated with significant beneficial effects for the patient and the allograft without an increased immunologic risk.

Living Related Kidney Transplantation Without Calcineurin Inhibitors: Initial Experience in a Mexican Center

We performed a prospective randomized trial comparing sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone to cyclosporine/MMF/prednisone and selected induction therapy with basiliximab. Twenty patients received sirolimus (10 mg loading dose followed by 3 mg/m body surface area/day, keeping 24-hr trough levels at 10-15 ng/mL for six months and 5-10 ng/mL thereafter. Twenty-one patients began cyclosporine (4 to 8 mg/kg/day, keeping 12-hour trough levels at 150-300 ng/mL for 6 months and 100-200 ng/mL afterwards). Mean follow up was 15.8 months. One-year patient and graft survival was similar in both groups (>90%). Acute rejection rate was 16.6% in the sirolimus group and 5.2% in the cyclosporine group (P=NS). There were no differences in mean serum creatinine between groups. No patients who received basiliximab and had sirolimus target levels suffered acute rejection at one year. The sirolimus group had significantly higher cholesterol and triglycerides. A calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen using sirolimus produces comparable one-year transplant outcomes in living related kidney transplants compared to a calcineurin inhibitor regimen.

Post-Rapamycin Proteinuria: Incidence, Evolution, and Therapeutic Handling at a Single Center

We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the safety, incidence, and management of proteinuria in 31 renal transplant recipients converted to Rapamycin (RAPA). All patients received RAPA immediately after the cessation of the calcineurin inhibitor or the antiproliferative drug. No acute rejection episodes were seen after this regimen. Chronic allograft nephropathy (58.1%) and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (51.6%), both biopsy-proven, were the major reasons to introduce RAPA. Post-RAPA proteinuria was defined as the appearance of urine protein excretion >300 mg/d or any further increase in protein among those who showed previously elevated levels. We observed an elevated incidence of proteinuria of 48.4%. It started at 5.3 +/- 2.5 months after the conversion and 60% occurred within 6 months. The proteinuria increased from a median of 200 mg/d to 1466 mg/d (P < .001). Age, gender, race, HLA mismatches, time to onset of RAPA, level of previous proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate, use of renin-angiotensin blockers, and etiology of chronic kidney disease were similar between the groups with or without proteinuria. Once it appeared, we suspended the drug in only 4 patients (26.7%), initiated or augmented the dosage of renin-angiotensin blockers in 26.7%, adjusted the RAPA dose in 20.1%, and did not perform a specific measure in 40% (6 of 15). At 15.6 +/- 12.7 months, 91% showed no further increase or reduction in proteinuria. We observed a high prevalence of proteinuria among renal transplant recipients converted to RAPA (48.4%). In addition, RAPA was suspended in only 4 patients and the proteinuria showed a tendency to stabilize or reduce over time.

Calcineurin Inhibitor Avoidance Versus Steroid Avoidance Following Kidney Transplantation: Postoperative Complications

This study compared early postoperative complications in kidney transplant recipients treated with either a sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen or a tacrolimus-based steroid-free regimen. We used a single-center, prospective, sequential but nonrandomized study design. Consecutive recipients of primary cadaveric or non-HLA identical kidney transplant recipients received either a CNI-free regimen, consisting of sirolimus 5 mg daily beginning postoperative day 3, mycophenolate mofetil 1 gm twice a day, and methylprednisolone 500 mg intraoperatively, then prednisone 30 mg daily tapered to 10 mg daily at 3 months, or a prednisone-free regimen, consisting of methylprednisolone 500 mg, 250 mg, and 125 mg from days 0 to 2, then no further steroids, tacrolimus 0.075 mg/kg twice a day, and mycophenolate mofetil 1 g twice a day. All patients received thymoglobulin induction 6 mg/kg total dose. Outcome measures were patient and graft survival, BPAR, surgical and wound complications, viral infections and posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Both groups had excellent early outcomes with no significant difference in patient or graft survival, early renal function, BPAR, surgical or wound complications, or viral infections between the two groups. Patients in the sirolimus-based CNI-free group had a significantly higher incidence of PTDM and a trend toward more discontinuation due to drug toxicity. Whether either regimen improves long-term outcomes awaits longer follow-up.

Short-term Results Under Three Different Immunosuppressive Regimens at One Center

We examined short-term outcomes and posttransplant medical complications under three different immunosuppressive regimens at a single center. The study design was a randomized, prospective, open-label trial comparing a calcineurin inhibitor-free (CNI) protocol to standard triple therapy with tacrolimus, prednisone, and mycophenolate mofetil. They were also compared to a concurrent but nonrandomized third cohort treated with a prednisone-free protocol. All three groups had excellent early outcomes with no significant difference in patient or graft survival or biopsy-proven acute rejection. Serum creatinine was significantly lower in the CNI-free recipients. Lipid panels and posttransplant diabetes mellitus were significantly lower in the prednisone-free patients. Prednisone-free kidney transplant recipients have improved early glucose metabolism and hyperlipidemia compared to CNI-free or standard triple therapy recipients with comparable rejection and graft survival rates.

The current role of calcineurin inhibitors in posttransplant immunosuppression?

It is important to determine when to use and when to avoid calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). CNIs are associated with kidney dysfunction in some, but not all, transplant recipients. CNI-sparing protocols have their own drug-specific limitations. Two major clinical series suggest the benefit of routine CNI-sparing approaches, but our review suggests weaknesses in both. Ongoing studies are needed to determine which subgroups of recipients will benefit from CNIs.

The place of sirolimus in kidney transplantation: Can we reduce calcineurin inhibitor renal toxicity?

Sirolimus, a macrocylic lactone, blocks T-cell activation by a mechanism of action distinct from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Therefore, it may be expected that sirolimus would display a safety profile without the vasomotor form of nephrotoxicity characteristic of CNIs. Initial studies in rodent models and in psoriasis patients showed that sirolimus alone did not impair renal function. Subsequently, two pivotal, randomized double dummy, phase III trials in human renal transplantation demonstrated that sirolimus exacerbated the nephrotoxicity of full doses of CNIs. Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of this disorder. Subsequent experience has shown that cyclosporin A dose reduction, elimination, or avoidance mitigates these effects, particularly in patients distant from the transplant procedure. However, there is concern about recovery from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Animal models suggesting that sirolimus may delay recovery in this setting have been supported by non-randomized experiences at single centers, which have observed an increased incidence of delayed graft function among sirolimus-treated recipients. In contrast, large single- and multi-center studies have not confirmed this finding; impaired renal recovery has been observed in only occasional instances. Thus, present data indicate that sirolimus does not impair the function of an uninjured kidney, but whether the drug acts alone or potentiates conditions that delay recovery after ischemic injury remains to be established by large randomized trials specifically targeted to recipients at high risk for this complication.

Mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus combination in renal transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are potent non-nephrotoxic xenobiotic immunosuppressants. Their complementary properties may provide the rationale for their combination in induction and maintenance regimens. MMF, a reversible inhibitor of inosin monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) acts as an antiproliferative drug; and SRL, an mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor, inhibits cell proliferation driven by growth factors. Early experiences with the use of the SRL, MMF and steroid combination yielded insufficient prophylaxis of acute rejection. However, the introduction of induction therapy with mono- or polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies to the SRL-MMF and steroid combination brings an efficient acute rejection prophylaxis, while improving renal function and/or reducing of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). However, adverse events related to the use of this drug combination (mainly haematological and surgery-related) result in a high rate of discontinuations in some trials, which may hamper the potential benefits of this calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free strategy. Also, currently under investigation is whether in long-term immunosuppression, in MMF-treated patients, CNIs can be replaced by SRL to avoid and/or halt progression of chronic nephropathy and to improve graft survival. However, some authors reported a high proportion of patients with oral ulcers and proteinuria after switching to SRL. In short, refining the use of MMF and SRL may provide a better risk/benefit ratio to pave the way towards non-nephrotoxic immunosuppression.

Predictors of chronic kidney disease in long-term survivors of lung and heart-lung transplantation

Renal insufficiency is common after non-renal organ transplants. The predictors of long-term renal outcomes are not well established. A total of 219 lung and heart-lung transplant recipients surviving more than 6 months after transplantation were studied to determine predictors of time to doubling of serum creatinine and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with death as a competing risk. Median follow-up was 79 months (range 9-222 months). Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 96.3+/-34.5 mL/min/1.73 m2. One hundred twenty-two recipients (55%) doubled their serum creatinine, 16 (7.3%) progressed to ESKD and 143 (65%) died. The majority of recipients who survived >6 years had a GFR<60 mL/min at both 1 and 7 years. Most of the loss of renal function occurred in the first year post-transplant. Older age at transplant, lower GFR at 1 month and cyclosporine use in the first 6 months predicted shorter time to doubling of serum creatinine when death was handled as a competing risk. Based on this prevalence data and using GFR decay and death as study endpoints, we offer sample size estimates for a prospective, interventional trial that is aimed at slowing or preventing the progression of kidney disease.

Preservation of Renal Function and Cardiovascular Risk Factors

An update is given about some factors leading to loss of renal allograft, especially in relation to the use of tacrolimus and cyclosporine. We discuss both immunological, such as suboptimal immunosuppression, acute rejection, and noncompliance, as well as nonimmunological factor's such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic toxic effects of immunosuppressants, older donors, and delayed graft function.

Developments in clinical islet, liver thoracic, kidney and pancreas transplantation in the last 5 years

Although organ transplantation has matured into a proven therapy for end-stage organ failure, the many notable developments of the past 5 years speak to the multitude of remaining challenges. Two new procedures, islet transplantation and adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation, have emerged to enlarge our therapeutic armamentarium for Type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage liver disease, respectively. In cardiac transplantation, the acceptance of ventricular assist devices as destination therapy is a notable event in light of critical shortage of deceased donor organs. Both liver and lung allocation policies have made a dramatic paradigm shift away from waiting time toward the survival benefit of transplantation. Finally, primary threats to post-transplant longevity have gained an increasing share of the spotlight. Recognition of the impact of renal insufficiency for all nonrenal transplant recipients, of recurrent hepatitis C virus for liver recipients, and of accelerated vasculopathy for cardiac have identified novel end points for clinical trials.