Postmarketing surveillance of the safety profile of infliximab in 5000 Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis

A paradigm shift in rheumatoid arthritis over the past decade

Recent advances have improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the development of new therapeutics, including biological agents, have thus made it possible to strive for remission as a primary goal. Biological agents targeting a specific molecule have powerful functional capabilities, and the introduction of biological therapies has brought about revolutionary progress in RA management, culminating in a paradigm shift. There is clear evidence that a delay in treatment initiation and poor control of disease activity are associated with joint damage progression, so treatment should be started immediately after the diagnosis of RA and adapted according to disease activity as assessed by validated composite measures. In this review, we will summarize the changes in the classification and remission criteria and describe the clinical efficacies of biological agents in RA. We also discuss new promising therapies and propose future perspectives in the rheumatology field.

Peripheral neuropathies during biologic therapies

Peripheral neuropathies should be recognized as the adverse effects of biological agents, especially anti-TNF agents. However, no solid clinical databases for biological agent-associated peripheral neuropathies (BAPN) have been established in Japan. Here we report two cases of peripheral neuropathy associated with anti-TNF agents. One was peroneal motor neuropathy. The other case was chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. In addition, we summarize the previous reports on BAPN and discuss their prevalence rate, pathogenesis and management.

Safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients: postmarketing surveillance report of 7740 patients

OBJECTIVES

To confirm the safety and effectiveness of adalimumab and to evaluate the influence of the concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

Postmarketing surveillance of 7740 Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients was performed. All patients who received adalimumab in the registration period were followed for 28 weeks after starting treatment for safety and 24 weeks for effectiveness. Effectiveness was measured by duration of morning stiffness, swollen and tender joint counts (28 joints), patient global assessment of disease activity, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and serum C-reactive protein.

RESULTS

Comparable rates of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in this study and in the interim analysis. Age, pulmonary disease history or comorbidity, co-existing diabetes mellitus, concomitant MTX at doses of > 8 mg/week and concomitant glucocorticoids at doses of > 5 mg/day were risk factors for infections. All mean values of effectiveness measurements improved. Relatively lower disease activity at baseline, biologic-naïve, concomitant MTX use and early RA stage/low functional class were background factors contributing to the effectiveness. The combination of adalimumab with MTX improved the response to adalimumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab, especially with concomitant use of MTX, provided significant improvement in disease activity, without any unexpected ADRs in Japanese RA patients.

Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol without methotrexate co-administration in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the HIKARI randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This 24-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study (NCT00791921) investigated efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in whom methotrexate (MTX) cannot be administered.

METHODS

A total of 230 patients were randomized to subcutaneous CZP 200 mg (induction dosing: 400 mg at Weeks 0, 2 and 4) or placebo every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

ACR20 responses with CZP were rapid and significant versus placebo at Week 1, sustained to Week 12 (67.2% vs. 14.9%) and Week 24 (63.8% vs. 11.4%). Week 24-modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) change from baseline (CFB) was 0.48 (CZP) versus 2.45 (placebo). CZP treatment was associated with higher Week 12 ACR20 responses versus placebo (with non-MTX disease modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs], 74.2% vs. 20.0%; without [monotherapy], 59.3% vs. 8.2%) and inhibition of radiographic progression at Week 24 (mTSS CFB; with non-MTX DMARDs, 0.24 vs. 1.61; monotherapy, 0.68 vs. 3.65). Incidences of serious adverse events were 11.2% (CZP) and 2.6% (placebo); one CZP patient died of dissecting aortic aneurysm.

CONCLUSION

CZP treatment with and without non-MTX DMARDs in Japanese patients in whom MTX cannot be administered resulted in rapid, sustained reductions in RA signs and symptoms. Notably, CZP monotherapy showed significant inhibition of radiographic progression.

Effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab: postmarketing surveillance of 7901 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan

OBJECTIVE

An all-patient postmarketing surveillance program was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the real-world clinical setting in Japan.

METHODS

Patients received 8 mg/kg TCZ every 4 weeks and were observed for 28 weeks. Data were collected on patient characteristics, and drug safety and effectiveness.

RESULTS

A total of 7901 patients were enrolled. Percentages of total and serious adverse events (AE) were 43.9% and 9.6%, respectively. The most common serious AE were infections (3.8%). Logistic regression analysis identified the following risk factors for the development of serious infection: age ≥ 65 years, disease duration ≥ 10 years, previous or concurrent respiratory disease, and concomitant corticosteroid dose > 5 mg/day (prednisolone equivalent). The incidence rate of serious infections in patients with ≥ 3 risk factors was 11.2%, compared with 1.2% for patients without risk factors. The Week 28 rates of 28-joint Disease Activity Score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate remission, Boolean remission, and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response were 47.6%, 15.1%, and 59.4%, respectively. Contributing factors for effectiveness were body weight ≥ 40 kg, less advanced RA, no previous biologics, no concomitant corticosteroids or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and low disease activity at baseline. From the benefit-risk balance analysis, patients with a high probability of remission and a low probability of developing serious infection were most likely to have less advanced RA and to have not received biologics previously.

CONCLUSION

These data confirm the safety and effectiveness of TCZ in patients with RA in the real-world clinical setting in Japan and identify factors that contribute to the successful use of TCZ for RA.

Efficacy and safety of reducing duration of infliximab infusion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of reducing the duration of infliximab infusion for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment.

METHODS

The first 6 infliximab infusions were each administered over a 2-h period. If no adverse reaction was observed, infusion times were shortened to 1 h starting with the seventh infusion with further shortening to 30 min starting with the thirteenth infusion. Subjects were divided into two groups: shortened infusion time group, in which infusion times were shortened as above; and constant infusion time group, in which infusion time was 2 h. Incidence of infusion reactions and improvement in disease activity score for 28 joints (DAS-28) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for total infusions were compared for the seventh to twelfth and thirteenth to eighteenth infusions.

RESULTS

The incidences of infusion reactions after the seventh to twelfth and thirteenth to eighteenth infusions in the shortened infusion time group were 0.53% and 0.58%, respectively. In the constant infusion time group, these were 0.70% and 0.67%, respectively. Furthermore, shortening the infusion duration did not affect the DAS-28 (ESR) improvement rate.

CONCLUSIONS

We established that this stage-wise shortening of infusion duration, first to 1 h and then to 30 min, did not compromise the safety or efficacy of treatment.

Interstitial lung diseases induced or exacerbated by DMARDS and biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

To review published cases of induced or exacerbated interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) associated with non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) and biologics and to discuss clinical implications in daily practice.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review from 1975 to July 2013 using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and abstracts from the ACR 2010-2012 and EULAR 2010-2013 annual meetings. Case reports and series that suggest a causative role of nbDMARDs (methotrexate [MTX], leflunomide [LEF], gold, azathioprine [AZA], sulfasalazine [SSZ], and hydroxychloroquine [HCQ]) and biologic agents (TNF inhibitors [TNFi], rituximab [RTX], tocilizumab [TCZ], abatacept [ABA], and anakinra) in causing ILD or worsening a pre-existing ILD in RA patients were included. Results from observational and postmarketing studies as well as reviews on this topic were excluded from the qualitative analysis but still considered to discuss the implication of such drugs in generating or worsening ILD in RA patients. Comparisons were made between MTX-induced ILD in RA and the cases reported with other agents, in terms of clinical presentation, radiological features, and therapeutic management and outcomes.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 32 articles for MTX, 12 for LEF (resulting in 34 case reports), 3 for gold, 1 for AZA, 4 for SSZ, 27 for TNFi (resulting in 31 case reports), 3 for RTX, 5 for TCZ (resulting in 8 case reports), and 1 for ABA. No case was found for HCQ or anakinra. Common points are noted between LEF- and TNFi-related ILD in RA: ILD is a rare severe adverse event, mostly occurs within the first 20 weeks after initiation of therapy, causes dyspnea mostly in older patients, and can be fatal. Although no definitive causative relationship can be drawn from case reports and observational studies, these data argue for a pulmonary follow-up in RA patients with pre-existing ILD, while receiving biologic therapy or nbDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

As previously described for MTX, growing evidence highlights that LEF, TNFi, RTX, and TCZ may induce pneumonitis or worsen RA-related pre-existing ILD. Nonetheless, identifying a causal relationship between RA therapy and ILD-induced toxicity clearly appears difficult, partly because it is a rare condition.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury: an update on the 2007 overview

INTRODUCTION

Idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI) is rare, with an incidence of approximately 19 per 100,000 treated individuals.

AREAS COVERED

An update on the epidemiology, pathogenic mechanisms, diagnosis, outcome, risk factors for idiosyncratic drug-induced hepatotoxicity, specific classes of drug hepatotoxicity and biomarkers to predict DILI are covered. Cumulative drug exposure and HLA phenotypes play an important role in the pathogenesis of DILI. Patients who present with suspected DILI and jaundice should have biliary obstruction and acute viral hepatitis, including hepatitis E excluded. Immune-mediated DILI will respond to steroid therapy. Patients with an elevated bilirubin and a hepatocellular pattern of liver function tests have severe liver injury with a mortality of greater than 10% and a risk of acute liver failure. Women have an increased risk of hepatocellular DILI. Antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and antidepressant therapy remain the commonest causes of DILI in the Western Hemisphere. Statin therapy rarely causes severe liver injury.

EXPERT OPINION

The establishment of prospective registries for DILI has provided valuable data on the pathogenesis and outcome of DILI. Drug-specific computerised causality assessment tools should improve the diagnosis of DILI. The clinical utility of genetic polymorphisms associated with drug-specific DILI is limited.

Risk of tuberculosis infection in anti-TNF-α biological therapy: from bench to bedside

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) biological agents, including soluble TNF-α receptors and anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibodies, bring new hope for treating rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, but also increase the risk of infection, especially tuberculosis (TB) infection. Recent findings have shown that the physiological TNF-mediated signaling was somehow impaired by TNF antagonists, leading to the exacerbation of chronic infection associated with aberrant granuloma formation and maintenance. Although both receptor and antibody agents appear to pose an equally high risk in causing development of new TB infections, monoclonal anti-TNF-α antibody seems more inclined to reactivate latent TB infection. This review is focused on the underlying mechanisms that cause the TB risk in the anti-TNF-α therapy and also the strategies to deal with it, with the aim of reducing the TB incidence during anti-TNF-α biological therapies.

Hepatitis B and inflammatory bowel disease: Role of antiviral prophylaxis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a very common infection worldwide. Its reactivation in patients receiving immunosuppression has been widely described as being associated with significant morbidity and mortality unless anti-viral prophylaxis is administered. Treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients has changed in recent years and immunosuppression and biological therapies are now used more frequently than before. Although current studies have reported an incidence of hepatitis B in inflammatory bowel disease patients similar to that in the general population, associated liver damage remains an important concern in this setting. Liver dysfunction may manifest in several ways, from a subtle change in serum aminotransferase levels to fulminant liver failure and death. Patients undergoing double immunosuppression are at a higher risk, and reactivation usually occurs after more than one year of treatment. As preventive measures, all IBD patients should be screened for HBV markers at diagnosis and those who are positive for the hepatitis B surface antigen should receive antiviral prophylaxis before undergoing immunosuppression in order to avoid HBV reactivation. Tenofovir/entecavir are preferred to lamivudine as nucleos(t)ide analogues due to their better resistance profile. In patients with occult or resolved HBV, viral reactivation does not appear to be a relevant issue and regular DNA determination is recommended during immunosuppression therapy. Consensus guidelines on this topic have been published in recent years. The prevention and management of HBV infection in IBD patients is addressed in this review in order to address practical recommendations

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a survey of prophylaxis patterns among gastroenterology providers

BACKGROUND

The use of combination immunosuppressive agents is associated with reports of pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP). The aim of this study was to determine practice patterns among gastroenterology providers for PJP prophylaxis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

An internet-based survey of 14 questions was sent through e-mail to a random sampling of 4000 gastroenterologists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants between November 2011 and February 2012. Three reminder e-mails were sent to providers who had not completed the survey.

RESULTS

The invitation e-mail that contained the link to the survey was clicked by 504 providers and the completed surveys were returned by 123 of them (78% physicians, 11% nurse practitioners, 11% physician assistants). The response rate was 24.4%. Seventy-nine percent of the respondents had managed >25 patients with IBD in the past year, with as much as one-third of all respondents managing >100 patients. Eight percent of the respondents reported patients who had developed PJP on immunosuppressive therapy, 11% reported initiating PJP prophylaxis, mostly for patients on triple immunosuppressive therapy. Prescription of PJP prophylaxis was not significantly associated with the number of years in practice or the number of IBD patients treated. However, providers with patients that had developed PJP were 7.4 times more likely to prescribe prophylaxis (P = 0.01). In addition, providers in academic centers were 4 times more likely to initiate PJP prophylaxis than those in nonacademic centers (P = 0.03). The most common reasons for not prescribing PJP prophylaxis included the absence of guidelines on the benefits of prophylaxis, lack of personal experience with PJP, and the lack of knowledge on the need for prophylaxis in patients with IBD on combination immunosuppressive therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of guidelines seems to influence the decision on not to prescribe PJP prophylaxis in patients with IBD. Additional studies are needed to determine PJP risk factors and risks and benefits of prophylaxis.

Tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy, safety and its place in therapy

Tocilizumab is a humanized antihuman interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor monoclonal antibody. It was developed in Japan as the first biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug targeting IL-6 receptors. Many large-scale global studies have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, and in April 2008 it was approved in Japan for use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, sooner than in other countries. In this paper, I review the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in the light of front-line clinical data and data from large-scale studies, and I consider the place of tocilizumab treatment in real clinical practice.

Sex differences in effects and use of anti-inflammatory drugs

Gender accounts for important differences in the incidence, prevalence, and course of many immunoinflammatory diseases. However, similar treatment strategies, such as the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors, have been advocated for both genders. Experimental studies found that molecular mechanisms of inflammation differ in males and females. In our chapter we summarize the data concerning gender-specific aspects about prevalence of use, drug survival, responsiveness, and adverse drug effects of NSAIDs and TNF-α inhibitors. Gender-related differences in the prevalence and course of many autoimmune diseases as well as differences in effects of anti-inflammatory drugs should be considered for the tailored treatment options for these patients.

Sex-dimorphic adverse drug reactions to immune suppressive agents in inflammatory bowel disease

AIM: To analyze sex differences in adverse drug reactions (ADR) to the immune suppressive medication in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

METHODS: All IBD patients attending the IBD outpatient clinic of a referral hospital were identified through the electronic diagnosis registration system. The electronic medical records of IBD patients were reviewed and the files of those patients who have used immune suppressive therapy for IBD, i.e., thiopurines, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents (anti-TNF); infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA) and/or certolizumab, were further analyzed. The reported ADR to immune suppressive drugs were noted. The general definition of ADR used in clinical practice comprised the occurrence of the ADR in the temporal relationship with its disappearance upon discontinuation of the medication. Patients for whom the required information on drug use and ADR was not available in the electronic medical record and patients with only one registered contact and no further follow-up at the outpatient clinic were excluded. The difference in the incidence and type of ADR between male and female IBD patients were analyzed statistically by χ² test.

RESULTS: In total, 1009 IBD patients were identified in the electronic diagnosis registration system. Out of these 1009 patients, 843 patients were eligible for further analysis. There were 386 males (46%), mean age 42 years (range: 16-87 years) with a mean duration of the disease of 14 years (range: 0-54 years); 578 patients with Crohn’s disease, 244 with ulcerative colitis and 21 with unclassified colitis. Seventy percent (586 pts) of patients used any kind of immune suppressive agents at a certain point of the disease course, the majority of the patients (546 pts, 65%) used thiopurines, 176 pts (21%) methotrexate, 46 pts (5%) cyclosporine and one patient tacrolimus. One third (240 pts, 28%) of patients were treated with anti-TNF, the majority of patients (227 pts, 27%) used IFX, 99 (12%) used ADA and five patients certolizumab. There were no differences between male and female patients in the use of immune suppressive agents. With regards to ADR, no differences between males and females were observed in the incidence of ADR to thiopurines, methotrexate and cyclosporine. Among 77 pts who developed ADR to one or more anti-TNF agents, significantly more females (54 pts, 39% of all anti-TNF treated women) than males (23 pts, 23% of all anti-TNF treated men) experienced ADR to an anti-TNF agent [P = 0.011; odds ratio (OR) 2.2, 95%CI 1.2-3.8]. The most frequent ADR to both anti-TNF agents, IFX and ADA, were allergic reactions (15% of all IFX users and 7% of all patients treated with ADA) and for both agents a significantly higher rate of allergic reactions in females compared with males was observed. As a result of ADR, 36 patients (15% of all patients using anti-TNF) stopped the treatment, with significantly higher stopping rate among females (27 females, 19% vs 9 males, 9%, P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION: Treatment with anti-TNF antibodies is accompanied by sexual dimorphic profile of ADR with female patients being more at risk for allergic reactions and subsequent discontinuation of the treatment.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving adalimumab: a retrospective review and case-control study of 17 patients

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with adalimumab.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study to compare RA patients treated with adalimumab with and without PCP. Data from 17 RA patients who were diagnosed with PCP and from 89 RA patients who did not develop PCP during adalimumab treatment were collected.

RESULTS

For the PCP patients, the median age was 68 years old, with a median RA disease duration of eight years. The median length of time from the first adalimumab injection to the development of PCP was 12 weeks. At the onset of PCP, the median dosages of prednisolone and methotrexate were 5.0 mg/day and 8.0 mg/week, respectively. The patients with PCP were significantly older (p < 0.05) and had more structural changes (p < 0.05) than the patients without PCP. Computed tomography of the chest revealed ground-glass opacity without interlobular septal boundaries in the majority of the patients with PCP. Three PCP patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

PCP may occur early in the course of adalimumab therapy in patients with RA. Careful monitoring, early diagnosis, and proper management are mandatory to secure a good prognosis for these patients.

Pneumocystis jirovecii infection: an emerging threat to patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Accompanying the increased use of biologic and non-biologic antirheumatic agents, patients with RA have been exposed to an increased risk of Pneumocystis jirovecii infection, which causes acute fulminant P. jirovecii pneumonia (PCP). Mortality in this population is higher than in HIV-infected individuals. Several guidelines and recommendations for HIV-infected individuals are available; however, such guidelines for RA patients remain less clear. Between 2006 and 2008 we encountered a clustering event of P. jirovecii infection among RA outpatients. Through our experience with this outbreak and a review of the recent medical literature regarding asymptomatic colonization and its clinical significance, transmission modes of infection and prophylaxis of PCP, we have learned the following lessons: PCP outbreaks among RA patients can occur through person-to-person transmission in outpatient facilities; asymptomatic carriers serve as reservoirs and sources of infection; and short-term prophylaxis for eradication of P. jirovecii is effective in controlling PCP outbreaks among RA outpatients.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of etanercept 50 mg once weekly in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis and comparison with 25 mg etanercept twice weekly

OBJECTIVE

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors have been available in recent years for treating early and established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Twice-weekly administration of 25 mg etanercept (ETN) has demonstrated efficacy and safety. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of once-weekly administration of 50 mg ETN (ETN50), and to compare it with that of twice-weekly administration of 25 mg ETN (ETN25).

METHODS

The ETN50 group comprised 29 patients and the ETN25 group 26. The analysis compared changes from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)-C reactive protein (CRP) and DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) between the ETN50 and ETN25 groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 42.3 % of ETN50 patients achieved DAS28-ESR remission (<2.6), and 76.9 % experienced low disease activity at 24 weeks. Patients in the ETN50 group also experienced more significant improvement in DAS28-ESR at 4 weeks, higher DAS28-ESR remission rates, and lower disease activity rates than ETN25 group patients. No serious adverse events were experienced in the safety analysis set (ETN50 group).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that ETN50 can lead to earlier remission and higher remission rates compared with ETN25 in patients with RA.

Drug retention rates and relevant risk factors for drug discontinuation due to adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving anticytokine therapy with different target molecules

OBJECTIVE

To compare reasons for discontinuation and drug retention rates per reason among anticytokine therapies, infliximab, etanercept and tocilizumab, and the risk of discontinuation of biological agents due to adverse events (AE) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHOD

This prospective cohort study included Japanese RA patients who started infliximab (n=412, 636.0 patient-years (PY)), etanercept (n=442, 765.3 PY), or tocilizumab (n=168, 206.5 PY) as the first biological therapy after their enrolment in the Registry of Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients for Long-term Safety (REAL) database. Drug retention rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. To compare risks of drug discontinuation due to AE for patients treated with these biological agents, the Cox proportional hazard model was applied.

RESULTS

The authors found significant differences among the three therapeutic groups in demography, clinical status, comorbidities and usage of concomitant drugs. Development of AE was the most frequent reason for discontinuation of biological agents in the etanercept and tocilizumab groups, and the second most frequent reason in the infliximab group. Discontinuation due to good control was observed most frequently in the infliximab group. Compared with etanercept, the use of infliximab (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.51) and tocilizumab (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.04 to 3.76) was significantly associated with a higher risk of discontinuation of biological agents due to AE.

CONCLUSIONS

Reasons for discontinuation are significantly different among biological agents. The use of infliximab and tocilizumab was significantly associated with treatment discontinuation due to AE compared with etanercept.

Rituximab for refractory granulomatous eye disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of rituximab therapy for patients with granulomatous disease of the eye.

METHODS

Retrospective review was undertaken of cases seen at a single institution for ocular antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis or sarcoidosis with persistent ocular disease despite systemic therapy. All patients were treated with rituximab and followed for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Nine patients were identified (five with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, four with sarcoidosis), and all were treated for at least 6 months. Eight experienced improvement of eye disease and were able to reduce prednisone and other drug therapies. One patient remained stable, but still required high dosages of prednisone. All five patients with lung disease improved with rituximab therapy. Rituximab treatment was well tolerated. Two patients discontinued the drug due to leukopenia; however, both patients reinstituted rituximab at modified doses.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab therapy was effective in controlling granulomatous ocular disease in most cases. The drug was corticosteroid-sparing and effective in refractory cases, with no severe adverse events encountered.

Effect of cimetidine on pentamidine induced hyperglycemia in rats

The antiprotozoal agent pentamidine, used for the treatment of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP), is known to cause abnormalities in blood glucose homeostasis, such as hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Pentamidine has been reported to be a substrate of organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1). We investigated the combination effects of cimetidine, an OCT1 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of pentamidine and on pentamidine-induced hyperglycemia. Pentamidine was infused intravenously to rats for 20 min at a dose of 7.5 or 15 mg/kg and serum samples were obtained periodically. The serum concentration of glucose did not change significantly after pentamidine infusion at 7.5mg/kg, while it increased with pentamidine at 15 mg/kg, and the maximal concentration of glucose was 167 ± 36 mg/dl, 30 min after the start of pentamidine infusion. Cimetidine (50mg/kg) enhanced the pentamidine-induced elevation of glucose concentration and the maximal concentration of glucose was 208 ± 33 mg/dl in the pentamidine 15 mg/kg treated group. Cimetidine combination significantly reduced total body clearance of pentamidine and increased pentamidine concentrations in the liver, kidneys, and lungs. A significant correlation was found between changes in serum glucose concentrations and serum concentrations of pentamidine 30 min after the start of pentamidine infusion. These results suggest that the hyperglycemic effect of pentamidine is dependent on the concentration of pentamidine and can be enhanced by cimetidine combination.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in non-HIV-infected patients in the era of novel immunosuppressive therapies

In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a well-known opportunistic infection, and its management has been established. However, PCP is an emerging threat to immunocompromised patients without HIV infection, such as those receiving novel immunosuppressive therapeutics for malignancy, organ transplantation, or connective tissue diseases. Clinical manifestations of PCP are quite different between patients with and without HIV infections. In patients without HIV infection, PCP rapidly progresses, is difficult to diagnose correctly, and causes severe respiratory failure with a poor prognosis. High-resolution computed tomography findings are different between PCP patients with HIV infection and those without. These differences in clinical and radiologic features are the result of severe or dysregulated inflammatory responses that are evoked by a relatively small number of Pneumocystis organisms in patients without HIV infection. In recent years, the usefulness of PCR and serum β-D-glucan assay for rapid and noninvasive diagnosis of PCP has been revealed. Although corticosteroid adjunctive to anti-Pneumocystis agents has been shown to be beneficial in some populations, the optimal dose and duration remain to be determined. Recent investigations revealed that Pneumocystis colonization is prevalent, and that asymptomatic carriers are at risk for developing PCP and can serve as the reservoir for the spread of Pneumocystis by person-to-person transmission. These findings suggest the need for chemoprophylaxis in immunocompromised patients without HIV infection, although its indication and duration are still controversial. Because a variety of novel immunosuppressive therapeutics have been emerging in medical practice, further innovations in the diagnosis and treatment of PCP are needed.

Drug induced interstitial lung disease

With an increasing number of therapeutic drugs, the list of drugs that is responsible for severe pulmonary disease also grows. Many drugs have been associated with pulmonary complications of various types, including interstitial inflammation and fibrosis, bronchospasm, pulmonary edema, and pleural effusions. Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) can be caused by chemotherapeutic agents, antibiotics, antiarrhythmic drugs, and immunosuppressive agents. There are no distinct physiologic, radiographic or pathologic patterns of DILD, and the diagnosis is usually made when a patient with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is exposed to a medication known to result in lung disease. Other causes of ILD must be excluded. Treatment is avoidance of further exposure and systemic corticosteroids in patients with progressive or disabling disease.

Colonization by Pneumocystis jirovecii and its role in disease

Although the incidence of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) has decreased since the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy, it remains an important cause of disease in both HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected immunosuppressed populations. The epidemiology of PCP has shifted over the course of the HIV epidemic both from changes in HIV and PCP treatment and prevention and from changes in critical care medicine. Although less common in non-HIV-infected immunosuppressed patients, PCP is now more frequently seen due to the increasing numbers of organ transplants and development of novel immunotherapies. New diagnostic and treatment modalities are under investigation. The immune response is critical in preventing this disease but also results in lung damage, and future work may offer potential areas for vaccine development or immunomodulatory therapy. Colonization with Pneumocystis is an area of increasing clinical and research interest and may be important in development of lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In this review, we discuss current clinical and research topics in the study of Pneumocystis and highlight areas for future research.

Advances in treatment of Crohn's disease with adalimumab

Adalimumab is a subcutaneously administered, fully humanized anti-TNF-α monoclonal IgG1 antibody and represents an important new therapeutic option for the treatment of Crohn's disease for its convenient mode of administration and less adverse events. Adalimumab is effective in inducing and maintaining clinical response and remission in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease, which permits to spare potential steroid usage, achieve mucosal healing and improve the quality of life in these patients. Adalimumab has also been shown to be beneficial to patients who lose response or are intolerant to infliximab and to promote the closure of the fistula orifice. This article reviews the recent advances in the treatment of Crohn's disease with adalimumab.

Elevation of KL-6 serum levels in clinical trials of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a report from the Japan College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee for Safety of Biological DMARDs

OBJECTIVE

The associations between elevated levels of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were investigated in five Japanese clinical trials.

METHODS

Percentages and incidence rates were calculated for elevated serum KL-6 levels. Adverse events associated with elevated levels of serum KL-6 were investigated.

RESULTS

In RISING, a clinical trial for infliximab, 15.6 % of the enrolled patients met criterion B (KL-6 ≥500 U/ml and >1.5-fold increase over the baseline value) by week 54. In HIKARI, 7.8 % of the certolizumab pegol (CZP) group and 0 % of the placebo group met criterion B during the double-blind (DB) period (p = 0.003). In J-RAPID, 8.4 % of the methotrexate (MTX) + CZP and 3.9 % of the MTX + placebo groups met criterion B during the DB period. In GO-MONO, 1.8 % of the golimumab (GLM) and 1.3 % of the placebo groups met criterion B during the DB period. In GO-FORTH, 7.1 % of the MTX + GLM and 0 % of the MTX + placebo groups met criteron B during the DB period (p = 0.017). No adverse events accompanied the elevation of serum KL-6 levels in 95.7 % of these patients.

CONCLUSION

Serum KL-6 levels may increase during anti-TNF therapy without significant clinical events. In these patients, continuing treatment with TNF inhibitors under careful observation is a reasonable option.

A retrospective study of serum KL-6 levels during treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a report from the Ad Hoc Committee for Safety of Biological DMARDs of the Japan College of Rheumatology

OBJECTIVE

We investigated associations between treatment with methotrexate (MTX) or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and elevation of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Using a standardized form, data were collected retrospectively from medical records and analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Of a total of 198 RA patients with KL-6 serum levels measured at initiation of treatment (month 0) and two or more times by month 12, 27 (17.9 %) of 151 RA patients treated with biological DMARDs, including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and tocilizumab (the biological DMARDs group), and 5 (10.6 %) of 47 patients treated without biological DMARDs but with MTX (MTX group), met criterion B (max. KL-6 ≥500 U/ml and >1.5-fold from baseline) by 12 months. The majority of patients (n = 28) meeting criterion B had no apparent interstitial lung disease or malignancy. Of these 28 patients, 21 had serum KL-6 levels available after reaching their maximum level, and 13 (61.9 %) of the 21 then met criterion R [decrease to less than 500 U/ml or to less than (baseline + 0.5 × (maximum - baseline))] by month 12.

CONCLUSION

Serum KL-6 levels may increase during treatment with MTX or these biological DMARDs without significant clinical events.

Risk of hepatitis B reactivation in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors

The use of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors has been increasing especially in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). As TNF-α inhibitors are strongly immunosuppressive, the occurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has recently been observed. Reports suggest a higher risk of complicating HBV reactivation in carriers who are treated with TNF-α inhibitors. Therefore, HBV carriers are recommended to undergo prophylactic administration of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs). Our literary analysis uncovered several characteristics of de novo hepatitis B due to TNF-α inhibitors. First, the time between the start of TNF-α inhibitors and the occurrence of de novo hepatitis was longer than one year. Second, patients were usually treated with additional non-biologic agents, which also had immunosuppressive effects. Third, the disease could be fatal. Fourth, several types of TNF-α inhibitors exhibited a risk of developing de novo hepatitis. Although the incidence of de novo hepatitis B varied among reports (0-5%/year), it is suggested that patients with prior HBV infection are at risk of developing de novo hepatitis due to TNF-α inhibitors. Many reports maintain that regular measurement of HBV DNA is effective in preventing de novo hepatitis. Prophylactic administration of NAs is also considered useful to avoid de novo hepatitis, although the issue of cost-effectiveness needs to be addressed. Lastly, whereas maintenance of circulating anti-HBs titer using HB vaccines may be effective in responders to prevent de novo hepatitis, further studies are required to clarify the utility of HB vaccination.

Pneumococcal polyarticular septic arthritis after a single infusion of infliximab in a rheumatoid arthritis patient: a case report

Introduction

We present a case of Streptococcus pneumoniae polyarticular septic arthritis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis receiving a single infusion of infliximab.

Case presentation

A 38-year-old Japanese man with a 5-year history of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis had previously received sulphasalazine and methotrexate therapies and was on regular low-dose prednisolone therapy. Despite these treatments, his disease activity remained high and infliximab was introduced in addition to methotrexate, prednisolone, and folic acid. However, he was admitted to hospital with a fever of 40.6°C, chills, and polyarthralgia eight days after the first infusion of infliximab. His joints were swollen, painful, and warm. Laboratory data showed marked acute inflammation. He was diagnosed with bacterial septic polyarthritis, and emergency surgical joint lavage and drainage was performed at the knees along with needle aspiration and lavage of the ankles and right wrist. He was then given intravenous antibiotic therapy for 31 days. He made a good recovery and was discharged on day 37.

Conclusions

We believe this is the first reported case of severe pneumococcal septic arthritis requiring hospitalization in a patient treated with infliximab. S. pneumonia is now a well-recognized but uncommon cause of polyarticular septic arthritis that can lead to cessation of therapy, as in our patient's case.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia associated with etanercept treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective review of 15 cases and analysis of risk factors

OBJECTIVES

The association of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy with opportunistic infections in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients has been reported. The goal of this study was to clarify the clinical characteristics and the risk factors of RA patients who developed Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) during etanercept therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, case-control study in which 15 RA patients who developed PCP were compared with 74 RA patients who did not develop PCP during etanercept therapy.

RESULTS

PCP developed within 26 weeks following the first injection of etanercept in 86.7% of the patients. All PCP patients presented with a rapid and severe clinical course and the overall mortality was 6.7%. Independent risk factors were identified using multivariate analysis and included age ≥65 years [hazard ratio (HR) 3.35, p = 0.037], coexisting lung disease (HR 4.48, p = 0.009), and concomitant methotrexate treatment (HR 4.68, p = 0.005). In patients having a larger number of risk factors, the cumulative probability of developing PCP was significantly higher (p < 0.001 for patients with two or more risk factors vs. those with no risk factor, and p = 0.001 for patients with one risk factor vs. those with no risk factor).

CONCLUSION

Physicians must consider the possibility of PCP developing during etanercept therapy in RA patients, particularly if one or more risk factors are present.

Revolutionary change in rheumatoid arthritis management with biological therapy

Biological agents targeting a specific molecule have extraordinarily fine specificity and powerful functional capabilities. By the introduction of biological therapy, management of rheumatoid arthritis has undergone a revolution and a paradigm shift. In this review, I will summarize the role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis of the molecules targeted by biological agents. Providing evidence obtained in clinical trials and investigator-initiated clinical studies in Japan, the effectiveness and safety of biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis are discussed. Finally, studies aiming at a personalized strategy with biological agents are listed and the future perspectives toward tailor-made medicine in the field of rheumatology are discussed.

Safety and efficacy of various dosages of ocrelizumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate therapy: a placebo-controlled double-blind parallel-group study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab (OCR) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX 6-8 mg/week received an infusion of 50, 200, or 500 mg OCR or placebo on Days 1 and 15 and were observed for 24 weeks. The double-blind period was prematurely terminated because of a possible risk for serious infection from OCR.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were randomized into the study. The incidence of infection was 37.7% (43/114) in the OCR groups combined, compared to 18.9% (7/37) in the placebo group. Serious infections occurred in 7 patients in the OCR groups combined; there were no serious infections in the placebo group. Among the serious infections, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia occurred in 2 patients in the OCR 200 mg group. The American College of Rheumatology 20% response rates at Week 24 (the primary endpoint) of the OCR 50, 200, and 500 mg groups were 54.1% (p = 0.0080), 55.6% (p = 0.0056), and 47.2% (p = 0.044), respectively, all significantly higher than that of the placebo group (25.0%).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest inappropriate benefit-risk balance of OCR in this patient population. Because rituximab is not approved for treatment of RA in Japan, it will be necessary to investigate safety and efficacy of other anti-B cell therapies in Japanese patients with RA. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00779220).

Biological treatments and connective tissue disease associated interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is no specific therapy for interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue diseases (CTDs-ILD), a potentially fatal condition for some of these patients. This article reviews currently available information on the effects on CTDs-ILD of biological treatments that are increasingly used with considerable success in various systemic diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

A beneficial effect of antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents on CTDs-ILD has been described in sporadic patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, and despite the fact that there was no clear evidence of pulmonary toxicity of these agents in randomized-controlled trials comprising thousands of patients with RA and spondylarthropathies, new onset or exacerbation of preexisting ILD with high mortality rates has so far been observed in 144 RA patients following anti-TNF treatment in clinical practice. Likewise, administration of the B-cell depleting anti-CD20 antibody rituximab was beneficial for ILD in SSc patients but associated with new-onset ILD in isolated patients with RA and SLE. Pertinent information on other biological treatments is currently lacking.

SUMMARY

Data on the therapeutic role of biological agents in CTDs-ILD is preliminary and controversial. Although preexisting ILD is not a contraindication for these agents, until more information is available their administration should be stopped when new pulmonary symptoms occur.

Radiological features and therapeutic responses of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving biological agents: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan

Objective

This study was performed to evaluate the radiological features of and therapeutic responses to pulmonary disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in the setting of biological therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 13 patients from multiple centers who had developed pulmonary NTM disease during biological therapy for RA, including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and tocilizumab.

Results

Most cases were asymptomatic or resulted in only common-cold-like symptoms. Abnormalities in computed tomography (CT) imaging were protean and frequently overlapped. The most predominant pattern was nodular/bronchiectatic disease (six cases), followed by alveolar infiltrate (three cases), cavitary disease (two cases), and pulmonary nodules (two cases). In most cases, pulmonary NTM disease had spread from a preexisting lesion; in particular, bronchial/bronchiolar abnormalities. In three cases, one or more nodular lesions with or without calcification were a focus of disease. Following the discontinuation of biological agents, most patients responded to anti-NTM therapy. Two patients showed no exacerbation in the absence of any anti-NTM therapy. In one patient, restarting tocilizumab therapy while continuing to receive adequate anti-NTM therapy produced a favorable outcome. In two other patients with a previous history of pulmonary NTM disease, introducing biological therapy led to recurrence, but anti-NTM therapy was effective in these patients.

Conclusion

CT abnormalities of pulmonary NTM disease in RA patients receiving biological therapy were variable, but were not unique to this clinical setting. NTM disease can spread from preexisting structural abnormalities, even if they are minute. Contrary to our expectations, the therapeutic outcomes of pulmonary NTM disease were favorable in these patients.

Interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologics

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a severe manifestation in connective tissue diseases (CTD), with an overall incidence of 15%, and it is still a challenge for clinicians evaluation and management. ILD is the most common manifestation of lung involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), observed in up to 80% of biopsies, 50% of chest Computed Tomography (CT) and only 5% of chest radiographs. Histopatological patterns of ILD in RA may present with different patterns, such as: usual interstitial pneumonia, non specific interstitial pneumonia, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, organizing pneumonia, and eosinophilic infiltration. The incidence of ILD in RA patients is not only related to the disease itself, many drugs may be in fact associated with the development of pulmonary damage. Some reports suggest a causative role for TNFα inhibitors in RA-ILD development/worsening, anyway, no definitive statement can be drawn thus data are incomplete and affected by several variables. A tight control (pulmonary function tests and/or HRCT) is mandatory in patients with preexisting ILD, but it should be also performed in those presenting risk factors for ILD and mild respiratory symptoms. Biologic therapy should be interrupted, and, after excluding triggering infections, corticosteroids should be administered.

Postmarketing surveillance of tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: interim analysis of 3881 patients

OBJECTIVE

An interim analysis of an all-patient postmarketing surveillance programme in Japan to investigate the safety of tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the real world.

METHODS

This analysis included 3881 patients. Patients received 8 mg/kg of tocilizumab every 4 weeks, and were observed for 28 weeks. Data on baseline characteristics and adverse events (AE) were collected.

RESULTS

Total and serious AE were reported as 167 and 27 events/100 patient-years, respectively. The most frequent AE and serious AE were infections. Logistic regression analysis identified the following risk factors for the development of serious infection: concurrent or medical history of respiratory disorders; prednisolone dose at baseline ≥5 mg/day; and age ≥65 years. Twenty-five patients died, and the standardised mortality ratio, with the Japanese general population in 2008 as reference, was 1.66, similar to the results from the Japanese cohort study for RA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Tocilizumab is acceptably safe in the real clinical setting. Tocilizumab needs to be used with consideration of the benefit-risk balance to avoid serious infections in elderly patients and those on high doses of corticosteroids or with a concurrent or medical history of respiratory disorders.

Should we routinely treat patients with autoimmune/rheumatic diseases and chronic hepatitis B virus infection starting biologic therapies with antiviral agents? NO

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects a large part of the world population. Different virological HBV categories have been identified and managing strategies for immunosuppressed patients with serological signs of current or past HBV infection has been proposed. Those strategies developed to manage patients in the haematology setting are based on strong evidence. Instead, management of such patients in the rheumatologic setting, especially those treated with biologic response modifiers, is mainly based on data derived by case reports and expert opinions. More data are needed to better manage these patients in case of signs of current or past HBV infection.

Risk of postoperative complications in rheumatoid arthritis relevant to treatment with biologic agents: a report from the Committee on Arthritis of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association

PURPOSE

Since biologic agents were introduced to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 2003, the number of orthopedic surgical procedures under treatment with biologic agents has been increasing in Japan. However, whether biologic agents cause an increase in the prevalence of postoperative complications is as yet unknown. The Committee on Arthritis of the Japanese Orthopedic Association investigated the prevalence of postoperative complications in patients with RA in teaching hospitals in Japan.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and November 2008, surveillance forms about medications and surgical procedures in patients with RA were sent to 2,019 teaching hospitals. Data were analyzed by the Rheumatoid Arthritis Committee.

RESULTS

Biologic agents were administered to RA patients in 632 of 1,245 hospitals (50.8%); 430 of the 1,245 hospitals (34.5%) used surgical intervention under treatment with biologic agents. The number of surgical procedures under treatment with biologic agents was 3,468, and the prevalence of infection was 1.3% (46 cases). The prevalence of infection was 1.0% (567 procedures) in 56,339 procedures under treatment with nonbiologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. There were no significant differences between biological and nonbiological treatment groups with respect to the prevalence of infection. In the joint arthroplasty group, the number of procedures under biological and nonbiological treatment was 1,626 and 29,903, and the prevalence of infection was 2.1% (34 procedures) and 1.0% (298 procedures), respectively. There was a significant difference between groups. The odds ratio was 2.12 (95% confidence interval 1.48-3.03, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The chance of having biological treatment with joint arthroplasty was more than twofold greater in patients with surgical-site infections compared with those treated with nonbiologic agents. Caution is required for surgical procedure, perioperative course, and obtaining consent for joint arthroplasty for patients with RA undergoing surgery under biological agents.