Stent versus gastrojejunostomy for the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2007;7:18. [PMID: 17559659 PMCID: PMC1904222 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230x-7-18]

Cost comparison of gastrojejunostomy versus duodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction

BACKGROUND

Gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) and stent placement are the most commonly used palliative treatments for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). In a recent randomized trial, stent placement was preferred in patients with a relatively short survival and GJJ in patients with a longer survival. As health economic aspects have only been studied in general terms, we estimated the cost of GJJ and that of stent placement in such patients.

METHODS

In the SUSTENT study, patients were randomized to GJJ (n = 18) or stent placement (n = 21). Pancreatic cancer was the most common cause of GOO. We compared initial costs and costs during follow-up. For cost-effectiveness, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated.

RESULTS

Food intake improved more rapidly after stent placement than after GJJ, but long-term relief of obstructive symptoms was better after GJJ. More major complications (P = 0.02) occurred and more reinterventions were performed (P < 0.01) after stent placement than after GJJ. Initial costs were higher for GJJ compared to stent placement (euro8315 vs. euro4820, P < 0.001). We found no difference in follow-up costs. Total costs per patient were higher for GJJ compared to stent placement (euro12433 vs. euro8819, P = 0.049). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of GJJ compared to stent placement was euro164 per extra day with a gastric outlet obstruction scoring system (GOOSS) >or=2 adjusted for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical effects were better after GJJ, although GJJ had higher total costs. Since the cost difference between the two treatments was only small, cost should not play a predominant role when deciding on the type of treatment assigned to patients with malignant GOO (ISRCTN 06702358).

Clinical outcomes of self-expandable metal stent and prognostic factors for stent patency in gastric outlet obstruction caused by gastric cancer

The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of endoscopic stenting for a gastric outlet obstruction caused by gastric cancer and the prognostic factors for stent patency by reviewing medical records. Eighty-one stents were inserted into 75 patients (48 men, average age 66 years). The technical and clinical success rates were 98 and 87%, respectively. The median stent patency was 55 days (95% CI 40-70 days). The median survival was 79 days (95% CI 58-123 days). Stent reobstruction caused by tumor ingrowth or overgrowth occurred in 25 cases (31%). Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that covered stents (odds ratio 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.76; P = 0.01) and chemotherapy after stent placement (odds ratio 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.91; P = 0.03) were significant prognostic factors for stent patency. This study found that endoscopic stenting is a safe and effective palliation treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction and a covered stent and chemotherapy are significant prognostic factors for stent patency.

Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Both gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) and stent placement are commonly used palliative treatments of obstructive symptoms caused by malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO).

OBJECTIVE

Compare GJJ and stent placement.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized trial.

SETTING

Twenty-one centers in The Netherlands.

PATIENTS

Patients with GOO.

INTERVENTIONS

GJJ and stent placement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes were medical effects, quality of life, and costs. Analysis was by intent to treat.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were randomized to GJJ and 21 to stent placement. Food intake improved more rapidly after stent placement than after GJJ (GOO Scoring System score > or = 2: median 5 vs 8 days, respectively; P < .01) but long-term relief was better after GJJ, with more patients living more days with a GOO Scoring System score of 2 or more than after stent placement (72 vs 50 days, respectively; P = .05). More major complications (stent: 6 in 4 patients vs GJJ: 0; P = .02), recurrent obstructive symptoms (stent: 8 in 5 patients vs GJJ: 1 in 1 patient; P = .02), and reinterventions (stent: 10 in 7 patients vs GJJ: 2 in 2 patients; P < .01) were observed after stent placement compared with GJJ. When stent obstruction was not regarded as a major complication, no differences in complications were found (P = .4). There were also no differences in median survival (stent: 56 days vs GJJ: 78 days) and quality of life. Mean total costs of GJJ were higher compared with stent placement ($16,535 vs $11,720, respectively; P = .049 [comparing medians]). Because of the small study population, only initial hospital costs would have been statistically significant if the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing had been applied.

LIMITATIONS

Relatively small patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite slow initial symptom improvement, GJJ was associated with better long-term results and is therefore the treatment of choice in patients with a life expectancy of 2 months or longer. Because stent placement was associated with better short-term outcomes, this treatment is preferable for patients expected to live less than 2 months. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN 06702358.).

Novel deployment of a covered duodenal stent in open surgery to facilitate closure of a malignant duodenal perforation

Background

Its a dilemma to attempt a palliative procedure to debulk the tumour and/or prevent future obstructive complications in a locally advanced intra abdominal malignancy.

Case presentation

A 38 year old Vietnamese man presented with a carcinoma of the colon which had invaded the gallbladder and duodenum with a sealed perforation of the second part of the duodenum. Following surgical exploration, it was evident that primary closure of the perforated duodenum was not possible due to the presence of unresectable residual tumour.

Conclusion

We describe a novel technique using a covered duodenal stent deployed at open surgery to aid closure of a malignant duodenal perforation.

Improved oral intake after palliative duodenal stenting for malignant obstruction: a prospective multicenter clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

We sought to test the hypothesis that placement of a new nitinol duodenal self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction is effective and safe in allowing patients to tolerate an oral diet.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter study, SEMSs (Duodenal WallFlex, Boston Scientific) were placed to alleviate gastroduodenal obstruction in inoperable patients without the ability to tolerate solid food. The primary study end point was improvement in oral intake monitored according to the 4-point Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) up to 24 weeks after stent placement.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients received SEMSs, which were successfully deployed on the first attempt in 41 cases (95%) and the second attempt in two (5%). Within 1 day and 7 days after SEMS placement, 52% and 75% of patients, respectively, benefited from a GOOSS increase > or =1. Resumption of solid food intake (GOOSS 2-3) was attained by 56% of patients within 7 days and 80% by 28 days. Of the patients attaining GOOSS 2-3, 48% remained on solid food until death or last follow-up. Device-related adverse events included stent occlusion/malfunction in 9% of patients and perforation in 5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Duodenal WallFlex stent placement promptly improves oral intake in a majority of inoperable patients with malignant gastroduodenal obstruction. In approximately half the patients achieving GOOSS 2-3, the capacity for solid food intake endures until death or last follow-up.

Interventional palliative strategies for malignant bowel obstruction

Malignant bowel obstruction is the luminal narrowing of the small bowel or colon due to direct or indirect cancer growth. Small bowel obstruction usually occurs at the level of the duodenum. Interventional, nonoperative strategies for palliation of malignant bowel obstruction include endoscopic and radiologic techniques. The latter are performed by interventional radiologists. Palliation of luminal small bowel and colonic obstruction primarily is achieved through the use of endoscopically or radiologically placed self-expandable metal stents. Gastrostomy and jejunal tubes also may be placed to provide palliative decompression when other palliative methods are not possible.

Feasibility of self-expandable metallic stent plus chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Self-expandable metallic stent placement is accepted as palliative therapy for advanced gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction, but data are lacking for chemotherapy after self-expandable metallic stent insertion. This study retrospectively compared results between surgery plus chemotherapy and stenting plus chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis.

METHODS

Subjects comprised 26 patients who received chemotherapy after surgery or endoscopic stenting for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis between April 2000 and December 2007 in four Japanese hospitals. Patients were categorized into two groups: 15 patients who received chemotherapy after surgery for pyloric stenosis (Surgery group); and 11 patients who received chemotherapy after self-expandable metallic stent placement for pyloric stenosis (Stent group).

RESULTS

Median survival time and median time to treatment failure were 284 days and 226 days in the Surgery group and 337 days and 247 days in the Stent group, respectively. No significant differences were noted between survival and time to treatment failure. No significant differences were found in median oral intake rate (Surgery, 93.1%; Stent, 93.2%) or median hospital stay rate (Surgery, 24.6%; Stent, 23.7%) during survival. Response rate was 45.5% in the Surgery group and 50% in the Stent group, with no significant difference. Likewise, no significant differences were noted between groups for frequencies of toxicity or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that chemotherapy after stenting is as effective and safe as chemotherapy after surgery. Stents may replace surgery in combination therapy with chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction.

Clinical outcomes of self-expandable metal stents in palliation of malignant anastomotic strictures caused by recurrent gastric cancer

AIM: To examine the technical feasibility and clinical outcomes of the endoscopic insertion of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for the palliation of a malignant anastomotic stricture caused by recurrent gastric cancer.

METHODS: The medical records of patients, who had obstructive symptoms caused by a malignant anastomotic stricture after gastric surgery and underwent endoscopic insertion of a SEMS from January 2001 to December 2007 at Kangnam St Mary’s Hospital, were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS: Twenty patients (15 male, mean age 63 years) were included. The operations were a total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy (n = 12), subtotal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction (n = 2) and subtotal gastrectomy with Billroth-II reconstruction (n = 8). The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 70%, respectively. A small bowel or colon stricture was the reason for a lack of improvement in symptoms in 4 patients. Two of these patients showed improvement in symptoms after another stent was placed. Stent reobstruction caused by tumor ingrowth or overgrowth occurred in 3 patients (15%) within 1 mo after stenting. Stent migration occurred with a covered stent in 3 patients who underwent a subtotal gastrectomy with Billroth-II reconstruction. Two cases of partial stent migration were easily treated with a second stent or stent repositioning. The median stent patency was 56 d (range, 5-439 d). The median survival was 83 d (range, 12-439 d).

CONCLUSION: Endoscopic insertion of a SEMS provides safe and effective palliation of a recurrent anastomotic stricture caused by gastric cancer. A meticulous evaluation of the presence of other strictures before inserting the stent is essential for symptom improvement.

Risk factors for morbidity and mortality following gastroenterostomy

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality following traditional surgical treatment of gastric outlet obstruction is high. The aim of this work was to identify risk factors predictive of postoperative complications and mortality following gastroenterostomy.

METHODS

One-hundred sixty-five consecutive patients subjected to open gastroenterostomy from January 1996 through July 2003 were included. Data on vital signs and operative variables were retrieved from medical records and recorded retrospectively. Risk factors for postoperative complications and mortality within 30 days after operation were analyzed with multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

The 30-day complication and death rates were higher after emergency operations (80% and 60%) than after elective operations (32% and 25%). A multivariate analysis disclosed that hypoalbuminemia (< or = 32 g/l), comorbidity, high age, and hyponatremia (< 135 micromol/l) were significantly associated with postoperative death, whereas hypoalbuminemia, comorbidity, high age, and emergency operation were predictors of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications and mortality after gastroenterostomy due to gastric outlet obstruction are associated with modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. Prior to surgery means should be taken to correct low albumin and sodium levels to prevent complications. In addition, the surgeon should consider alternative treatment modalities including laparoscopic gastroenterostomy, self-expanding metallic stents, or tube gastrostomy to relieve or palliate gastric outlet obstruction.

A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction

BACKGROUND

The traditional approach to palliating patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has been open gastrojejunostomy (OGJ). More recently endoscopic stenting (ES) and laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) have been introduced as alternatives, and some studies have suggested improved outcomes with ES. The aim of this review is to compare ES with OGJ and LGJ in terms of clinical outcome.

METHOD

A systematic literature search and review was performed for the period January 1990 to May 2008. Original comparative studies were included where ES was compared with either LGJ or OGJ or both, for the palliation of malignant GOO.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria (10 retrospective cohort studies, two randomised controlled trials and one prospective study). Compared with OGJ, ES resulted in an increased likelihood of tolerating an oral intake [odds ratio (OR) 2.6, p = 0.02], a shorter time to tolerating an oral intake (mean difference 6.9 days, p < 0.001) and a shorter post-procedural hospital stay (mean difference 11.8 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between 30-day mortality, complication rates or survival. There were an inadequate number of cases to quantitatively compare ES with LGJ.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates improved clinical outcomes with ES over OGJ for patients with malignant GOO. However, there is insufficient data to adequately compare ES with LGJ, which is the current standard for operative management. As these conclusions are based on observational studies only, future large well-designed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) would be required to ensure the estimates of the relative efficacy of these interventions are valid.

Treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction with stents: an evaluation of the reported variables for clinical outcome

Background

Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is commonly seen in patients with advanced gastric-, pancreatic-, duodenal, hepatobiliary or metastatic malignancies. Ten to 25% of patients with pancreatic cancer will develop duodenal obstruction during the course of the disease. Duodenal stenting with self-expandable metal stents is an alternative treatment to surgical bypass procedures. Our aim was to review the published literature regarding treatment of malignant GOO with stents to reveal whether the information provided is sufficient to evaluate the clinical effects of this treatment

Methods

A literature search from 2000 – 2007 was conducted in Pub Med, Embase, and Cochrane library, combining the following search terms: duodenal stent, malignant duodenal obstruction, gastric outlet obstruction, SEMS, and gastroenteroanastomosis.

All publications presenting data with ≥ 15 patients and only articles written in English were included and a review focusing on the following parameters were conducted: 1) The use of graded scoring systems evaluating clinical success; 2) Assessment of Quality of life (QoL) before and after treatment; 3) Information on stent-patency; 4) The use of objective criteria to evaluate the stent effect.

Results

41 original papers in English were found; no RCT's. 16 out of 41 studies used some sort of graded scoring system. No studies had objectively evaluated QoL before or after stent treatment, using standardized QoL-questionnaires, 32/41 studies reported on stent patency and 9/41 performed an oral contrast examination after stent placement. Objective quantitative tests of gastric emptying had not been performed.

Conclusion

Available reports do not provide sufficient relevant information of the clinical outcome of duodenal stenting. In future studies, these relevant issues should be addressed to allow improved evaluation of the effect of stent treatment.

A prospective observational study examining quality of life in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction

BACKGROUND

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) often complicates advanced malignancy. Palliative options include surgical bypass, endoscopic stent, percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG), or percutaneous jejunostomy (PEJ).

METHODS

We enrolled 50 patients with GOO secondary to unresectable primary or metastatic cancer in a study examining palliative interventions. Validated instruments assessed quality of life (QOL) at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months following intervention.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 64 days. A shorter hospital stay and trend to lower mortality were observed after stent placement; solid food intake and rates of secondary intervention were comparable. Both stent and surgical bypass were associated with acceptable QOL outcomes. Fifteen patients refused participation at 1 month and 28 died of disease before 3 months, so 10 patients completed all surveys.

CONCLUSIONS

Although malignant GOO is associated with poor survival, there are reasonable alternatives for palliation. QOL studies are difficult to complete in this population due to severity of illness and short life expectancy.

Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy in Patients with Obstruction of the Gastric Outlet Secondary to Advanced Malignancies

Surgical palliation is an important therapeutic goal in patients with gastric outlet obstruction from cancer. The use of laparoscopic approaches for this condition has not been well studied. Our objective is to compare surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open gastrojejunostomies in patients with gastric outlet obstruction secondary to advanced malignancies. We did a retrospective review of 20 patients who underwent a palliative gastrojejunostomy as their primary surgical procedure. There were 10 patients in the laparoscopic group and 10 patients in the open one. We identified no significant difference between groups in mean surgery time (116 vs 116 minutes) ( P = 0.99), blood loss (23 vs 142 mL) ( P = 0.19), or length of stay (8 vs 14 days) ( P = 0.14). We also identified no difference in median time to tolerate a regular diet (7 vs 8 days) ( P = 0.49) and median survival (11.2 vs 9.0 months) ( P = 0.83). Delayed gastric emptying was the most common complication occurring in four patients. There is no detectable difference in surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open gastrojejunostomies in the management of patients with obstruction of the gastric outlet secondary to cancer. Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy is a safe and feasible operation in this setting

Combined Intestinal and Biliary Stenting in Gastric Outlet and Biliary Obstruction

Background

Combined intestinal and biliary stenting is one of the effective palliative methods for patients with malignant gastric outlet and biliary obstruction. This study was to evaluate the effect of combined intestinal and biliary stenting in the palliation of gastric outlet and biliary obstruction.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with malignant gastric outlet and biliary obstruction underwent combined intestinal and biliary stenting. Intestinal stents were implanted by means of endoscopy and X-ray guidance. The subsequent biliary stents were implanted by percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage. The biliary stent pass through the side hole of intestinal stent mesh and its distal segment was located in the lumen of intestinal stent.

Results

Thirty-four intestinal stents and 32 biliary stents for 32 patients were implanted successfully. No lethal complications occurred. The average survival was 164 days.

Conclusions

The combined intestinal and biliary stenting is an effective and safe method for palliation of gastric outlet and biliary obstructions. The short-term results are satisfactory.

Enteral stents for malignancy: a report of 46 consecutive cases over 10 years, with critical review of complications

BACKGROUND

Current management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) includes surgical diversion or enteral stent placement for unresectable cancer. We analyzed the long-term results, predictive factors of outcomes, and complications associated with enteral stents with focus on their management.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2007, 46 patients with malignant GOO underwent placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) for palliation. Patients were captured prospectively after 2001 and followed until complication or death. Patency, management of complications, and long-term survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients had a mean survival of 152 +/- 235 days and a mean SEMS patency rate of 111 +/- 220 days. SEMS patency rates of 98%, 74%, and 57% at 1, 3, and 6 months were seen. Thirteen patients presented with obstruction and included two SEMS migration, two early occlusion, one fracture, four malignant ingrowth, and four with delayed clinical failure. Interventions included seven endoscopic revisions with three SEMS replacements. Six had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal arm placed. Two patients eventually underwent surgical bypass. Two patients required surgery for complications including delayed duodenal perforation and aortoenteric fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

SEMS effectively palliate gastric outlet obstructions that result from upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Their benefits offset potential complications or malfunctions, when a pluridisciplinary approach is adopted.

Endoscopic stenting-Where are we now and where can we go?

Self expanding metal stents (SEMS) play an important role in the management of malignant obstructing lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Traditionally, they have been used for palliation in malignant gastric outlet and colonic obstruction and esophageal malignancy. The development of the polyflex stent, which is a removable self expanding plastic stent, allows temporary stent insertion for benign esophageal disease and possibly for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to esophagectomy. Potential complications of SEMS insertion include perforation, tumour overgrowth or ingrowth, and stent migration. Newer stents are being developed with the aim of increasing technical and clinical success rates, while reducing complication rates. Other areas of development include biodegradable stents for benign disease and radioactive or drug-eluting stents for malignant disease. It is hoped that, in the future, newer stents will improve our management of these difficult conditions and, possibly, provide prognostic as well as symptomatic benefit in the setting of malignant obstruction.

Optimizing endoscopic placement of expandable stents throughout the GI tract

Expandable stents have now become accepted for the relief of malignant obstruction throughout the GI tract and biliary system. Almost all expandable stents are composed of metal. More recently, an expandable plastic stent has been developed for the treatment of benign esophageal conditions. The clinical response to these devices is dependent on proper stent placement and anatomical location. Proper stent placement, in turn, is dependent on being familiar with the characteristics of the devices, having knowledge of the length of the stricture and anatomy, and the location of the obstruction within the GI tract. This review summarizes the available devices and techniques for optimal placement of expandable stents.

Stents in the GI tract

The application of stents in the GI tract has expanded tremendously. Stent placement is the most frequently used treatment modality for palliating dysphagia from esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Newly designed esophageal stents, including the Polyflex stent and the Niti-S double stent, have been introduced to reduce recurrent dysphagia owing to migration or nontumoral or tumor overgrowth. Stents are also the treatment of choice for esophagorespiratory fistulas, for proximal malignant lesions near the upper esophageal sphincter, for recurrent carcinoma after esophagectomy or gastrectomy and for sealing traumatic or iatrogenic nonmalignant ruptures, such as Boerhaave's syndrome and leakages following surgery. Stents in the latter patient group should be removed within 4-8 weeks after placement to prevent the formation of granulation tissue or hyperplasia at the stent ends. For gastric outlet obstruction, many case series have been published. Only two, small, randomized controlled trials have compared stent placement with gastrojejunostomy to date, and a large, randomized trial is currently being conducted in The Netherlands. Obstructive jaundice caused by a malignancy in the common bile duct can be treated effectively with plastic or metal stent placement. However, a prognostic score needs to be developed that guides a treatment decision towards using either of these stents. Finally, colonic stents are applied successfully for acute malignant obstruction as a 'bridge to surgery' in patients with tumors that are deemed to be resectable, or as a palliative treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease.