Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Prediction of anti-tumour effect of thermochemotherapy within vitrothermochemosensitivity testing for non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated whether it is possible to predict the antitumour effects of thermochemotherapy from the results of anticancer agent sensitivity testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We produced a nude mouse cancer model using 4 lung cancer cell lines. Animals were divided into 4 groups: Thermotherapy (HT group), chemotherapy (CT group), thermochemotherapy (HT+CT group), and no therapy (NT group). Comparison of in vivo and in vitro effects were performed using cisplatin (CDDP), doxorubicin (ADR) and vinorelbine (NVB). In vivo thermotherapy was performed using the Thermotron RF IV, and radiofrequency (RF) capacitative hyperthermia device that induces a localised temperature of 42.0 degrees C for 45 min. The collagen gel embedded culture drug sensitivity test (CD-DST) was used for in vitro chemosensitivity analysis of the anticancer agents. In vitro thermochemotherapy was performed using a modified CD-DST method, with the incubator set at 42.0 degrees for the first hour of the 24 hours drug exposure period.

RESULTS

A good correlation was seen between in vivo and in vitro treated/control ratios (T/C%) in the HT group (R = 0.91, p = 0.09). Good correlations were also seen between in vivo and in vitro T/C in all cell lines in the CT group (R = 0.759, p = 0.09) and the HT+CT group (R = 0.65, p = 0.02). True positive rate was 87.5% (7/8), and true negative rate was 100% (4/4). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 100% (7/7), 80% (4/5), and 91.7% (11/12) respectively.

CONCLUSION

A modified CD-DST using an exposure temperature of 42 degrees C can be used to predict the antitumour effect of thermochemotherapy.

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly

Systemic chemotherapy provides improvement in both survival and quality of life for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Elderly patients have more comorbidities and tend to tolerate more poorly aggressive chemotherapy and radiation therapy than younger individuals. Our purpose in this article is to summarize recent studies of single-agent chemotherapy and combination regimens with cytotoxic or targeted therapies in the management of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. We have reviewed the available evidence in the literature to gauge the results of therapy for elderly patients with lung cancer. We found that single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard of care for nonselected elderly patients. Retrospective analyses suggest that the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy is similar in fit older and younger patients, with increased but acceptable toxicity for elderly patients. Therefore, the outcomes in the fit elderly mirror results observed in younger patients, although toxicity is generally greater.

Bortezomib induces schedule-dependent modulation of gemcitabine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in non-small cell lung cancer and blood mononuclear cells

Bortezomib combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced tumors, predominantly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showed an unexpected transient drop in the deoxycytidine plasma levels, a marker for gemcitabine activity. This study investigates the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effect of bortezomib on gemcitabine in NSCLC and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Gemcitabine metabolites, including difluoro-dCTP (dFdCTP), were studied in PBMCs from bortezomib/gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients and from volunteers and NSCLC cells (H460 and SW1573) exposed to 4 h simultaneous or sequential treatments of gemcitabine (50 μmol/L, 4 h) and bortezomib (100 nmol/L, 2 h). Gemcitabine total phosphate levels measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in PBMCs from bortezomib/gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients were strongly reduced after 90 min (-82.2%) up to 4 h post-gemcitabine infusion compared with gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients. Accordingly, bortezomib/gemcitabine combinations reduced dFdCTP in PBMCs treated ex vivo. Surprisingly, differential effects were observed in NSCLC cells. dFdCTP decreased after 4 h following gemcitabine removal in H460 but continued to increase for 24 h in SW1573. However, dFdCTP significantly increased (2-fold) in both cell lines in the bortezomib → gemcitabine exposure, coinciding with a major reduction in cell growth compared with single drugs, and the highest increase of deoxycytidine kinase expression, possibly mediated via E2F-1. Bortezomib affects differently gemcitabine pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in PBMCs and NSCLC cells, suggesting that PBMCs are not adequate to evaluate the anticancer activity of bortezomib/gemcitabine combinations. The bortezomib → gemcitabine/cisplatin schedule appeared a safe and active combination for the treatment of advanced NSCLC and the bortezomib → gemcitabine was the most cytotoxic combination in NSCLC cells. The increase of deoxycytidine kinase and dFdCTP might contribute to this synergistic interaction and supports its further clinical investigation.

Beyond doublet chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: combination of targeted agents with first-line chemotherapy

The first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved significantly over the past 5 years. As recently as 15 years ago, best supportive care (BSC) was considered an acceptable option for most patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, based on the concern that toxic effects of systemic chemotherapy overshadowed any potential benefits. The enhanced efficacy of platinum-based doublet chemotherapeutic regimens led to increases in overall patient survival relative to BSC. However, overall survival (OS) appeared to plateau, even with the introduction and refinement of these regimens. The addition of novel targeted agents targeting growth pathways to platinum-based regimens failed to overcome the 7.8- to 10.5-month survival barrier. After many phase III clinical trials, which involved tyrosine kinase inhibitors, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, protein kinase C inhibitors, and retinoids, this survival barrier had yet to be surmounted, although in some cases certain subgroups benefited, suggesting specific molecular correlations. Recently, inhibition of components of the angiogenesis pathway with the addition of bevacizumab to a platinum-based doublet led to statistically significant increases in OS, progression-free survival, and response rate relative to chemotherapy alone. This advance pushed the median survival of selected patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who met the eligibility criteria of the trial over the 12-month mark, thus offering patients and clinicians hope for more incremental advances in the future.

Chemotherapy for advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common, often fatal malignancy, and is most frequently diagnosed in the advanced stage. Systemic chemotherapy for advanced (Stage IIIB and IV), inoperable NSCLC has evolved over the course of the last few decades. Survival advantage was first noted with platinum chemotherapy, with ultimate development of platinum-containing doublet combinations, which have now become standard of care in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Over the course of the last few years, multiple nonplatinum combinations have also been demonstrated to be efficacious, and the addition of bevacizumab to existing doublet regimens has improved outcomes in this population of patients. Maintenance regimens for advanced stage NSCLC are currently under extensive investigation. Clinical trials have also recently demonstrated increased efficacy for agents such as docetaxel and pemetrexed in the second line setting for refractory disease.

Pemetrexed in first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed is an antitumor agent traditionally used as monotherapy for the second-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of chemonaïve patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Recently, pemetrexed has been approved in combination with cisplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC other than predominantly squamous cell histology. Studies that support the development of this indication are detailed in this review. We performed a PubMed/Medline database search to identify relevant literature from 1998 until August 2008. Bibliographies from identified references were searched, as well as were abstracts from the most relevant congresses in lung cancer area (American Society of Clinical Oncology Congress, World Conferences of Lung Cancer). We detailed pemetrexed studies in the first-line setting of NSCLC treatment, in monotherapy, in combination with platinum and also, with other agents. Data regarding efficacy differences related to different histologic types were also analyzed.

Patient attitudes towards chemotherapy and survival: a prospective observational study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

This multicenter, non-interventional, prospective, observational study aimed to determine whether patients' attitude to chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with gemcitabine-platinum. Chemonaive patients (n=1895) with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy were treated with a combination of gemcitabine plus cisplatin/carboplatin and followed for a maximum of 18 months. Patients' attitude to treatment was measured on a 5-point scale and responses were used to assign patients to one of the three need categories: A, maximum extension of survival with the acceptance of high toxicity (60.0% of patients); B, maximum extension of survival only if coupled with normal lifestyle (26.1%); C, relief of symptoms (13.8%). Median survival varied significantly among the need categories (A=13.00 months, B=15.70 months, C=15.33 months; log-rank test P=0.0415). Patient attitude to treatment (need categories) was not a significant prognostic factor for survival after adjusting for known prognostic factors (P=0.0503). After adjusting for baseline differences, patients in this study had a significantly lower risk of death than patients in three randomized trials (hazard ratio 0.879; 95% confidence interval: 0.775, 0.998; P=0.0458). In conclusion, in this observational study, patient attitude to chemotherapy was not an independent prognostic factor of survival.

Gemcitabine for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite agent which is active in several human malignancies, including nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of its acceptable toxicity profile, with myelosuppression being the most common adverse event, gemcitabine can be safely combined with a number of cytotoxic agents, including platinum derivatives and new-generation anticancer compounds. In fact, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is a first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC, pharmacoeconomic data indicating that it represents the most cost-effective regimen among platinum-based combinations with third-generation cytotoxic drugs. The drug has been investigated in the context of nonplatinum-based regimens in a number of prospective clinical trials, and might provide a suitable alternative for patients with contraindications to platinum. Recently, gemcitabine-based doublets have been successfully tested in association with novel targeted agents with encouraging results, providing further evidence for the role of the drug in the treatment of NSCLC. In the last few years several attempts have been pursued in order to identify molecular predictors of gemcitabine activity, and recent data support the feasibility of genomic-based approaches to customize treatment with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcome.

Rational use of cetuximab in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortality in the United States. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Most NSCLC patients present with loco-regionally advanced or metastatic disease where response rates are low and median overall survival approximates 8 to 10 months. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for NSCLC patients with metastatic disease. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and family of receptors play a critical role in lung cancer tumorigenesis. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds the EGFR, has demonstrated preclinical and clinical activity against NSCLC. This review focuses on the use of cetuximab in NSCLC.

Quality-of-life assessment in phase III clinical trials of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer

Health-related quality-of-life (QOL) endpoints in clinical trials provide decision makers with a more comprehensive picture of a specific treatment than activity-related endpoints alone. Such endpoints are increasingly being reported in cancer clinical trials. We reviewed phase III clinical trials that involved gemcitabine in the treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. A systematic literature search was undertaken and 16 phase III clinical trials were found in which gemcitabine therapy was included in a treatment arm and QOL was an endpoint. Twelve of the 16 trials compared a gemcitabine-based treatment with a non-gemcitabine-based treatment. Not all data were reported in the trials, and the findings are mixed. However, a review of these 12 trials generally shows that gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy treatments had either no different or more favourable QOL outcomes than non-gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy treatments. Ten of the 16 trials that were reviewed had a primary endpoint or objective that was not QOL. Of these ten trials, only four concluded that one treatment arm could be therapeutically favoured over another in terms of the non-QOL primary endpoint. Two of the trials reported no difference in QOL and two reported that QOL favoured the arm that was therapeutically favoured. Many more trials will need to be conducted in order to conclude that gemcitabine-containing arms are associated with a more desirable QOL than non-gemcitabine-containing arms and that QOL necessarily favours the therapeutically favoured arm in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Promising survival in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer treated with docetaxel and gemcitabine in combination as second-line therapy

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in men and women, and current second-line chemotherapy regimens yield relatively poor response and survival rates.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the combination of weekly docetaxel (D) and gemcitabine (G) would show activity in the second-line setting. We therefore conducted a phase II trial evaluating this regimen in patients with relapsed or progressive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after first-line platinum-based therapy.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent NSCLC, adequate physiologic indices, and exposure to one prior platinum-based regimen were eligible. Docetaxel 40 mg/m intravenous (IV) and gemcitabine (G) 800 mg/m IV weekly were administered on day 1 and 8 every 21 days. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity, G was escalated on an intrapatient basis to 1 g/m/wk. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR); event-free (EFS) and overall survival were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (median age 61 years; 20 [57%] male) were accrued. Most (88%) had previously received carboplatin/paclitaxel, 31.4% in combination with a third investigational agent, more than half (57.1%) had prior radiation. The median number of cycles was four. RR was 23%. Median EFS was 5.7 months and median overall survival was 12.5 months. Patients who had their cancer diagnosed more than or equal to 12 months before entering the trial had superior EFS (13.7 months versus 4.8 months). Toxicity was acceptable. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

A nonplatinum doublet with GD is feasible and effective in the treatment of recurrent, platinum-exposed NSCLC patients. RR and survival are promising.

Therapeutic Strategy for Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective:

To review the current practices for metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management and highlight the latest progress.

Data Sources:

A literature review using HighWire Press (1960–May 2008) was conducted using the following key words: non–small cell lung cancer, chemotherapy. supportive care, therapeutic strategy, quality of life (QOL), and targeted therapies.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Review articles, clinical trials, and case reports, as well as the references of those articles, were reviewed. Statistical significance and number of patients included in the studies were some of the aspects that were considered seriously. Response rates, overall survival, and progression-free survival were the major data considered.

Data Synthesis:

The therapeutic management of metastatic NSCLC has undergone a profound evolution over the past 10 years. The positive impact of chemotherapy on survival compared with supportive care atone has been demonstrated by several meta-analyses. The development of third-generation agents with better efficacy/toxicity ratios, such as vinorelbine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and pemetrexed, has led to improved therapeutic management of NSCLC, especially when tailored to patients' comorbidities and performance status. First-line platinum-based combinations remain the standard of care, with median survival 8 months and 1-year survival 35%, but no particular combination has yet shown superiority. First-line platinum regimens in combination with bevacizumab, a targeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor, have further improved NSCLC median survival. Moreover, second- and third-line treatments have evolved. The addition of small-molecule epidermal growth factor inhibitors and other targeted therapies has modified the pattern of NSCLC treatment. Specific management of the elderly and patients with poor performance status should be applied.

Conclusions:

Although there has been progress in the treatment of NSCLC, the gain in terms of clinical response and survival is still modest. Maintaining QOL and tailoring therapy for patients based on age, performance status, comorbidities, and toxicities, remain the first priority for clinicians.

An international, multicenter, randomized phase III study of first-line erlotinib followed by second-line cisplatin/gemcitabine versus first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by second-line erlotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: treatment rationale and protocol dynamics of the TORCH trial

Herein, we present a randomized phase III Italian-Canadian trial named TORCH (Tarceva or Chemotherapy). In TORCH, we are investigating whether erlotinib as first-line therapy until progression followed by chemotherapy with cisplatin/gemcitabine will not be inferior in terms of survival to the standard arm, consisting of first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine for 6 cycles, followed at progression by erlotinib until second progression. The primary objective is overall survival, and an adjunctive primary endpoint is activity of first-line treatment with erlotinib in terms of progression-free rate after 9 weeks of treatment. Secondary objectives include response rate, progression-free survival, toxicity, quality of life, and exploratory evaluations of tumor tissue and blood samples for biologic or genomic determinants of outcome. The study design is based on a noninferiority survival comparison with about 900 patients expected to be recruited. An early analysis of activity will be performed in the experimental arm (first-line erlotinib followed by chemotherapy).

Bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer death in Western countries. The median survival time for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor and chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for most patients with metastatic NSCLC. Platinum-based chemotherapy has long been the standard of care for advanced NSCLC. The formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) is needed for the growth and invasiveness of primary tumours, and plays an important role in metastatic growth. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has emerged as a key potential target for the pharmacological inhibition of tumour angiogenesis. This review discusses current data and the future potential of bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that binds VEGF, in the treatment of NSCLC. Results from a phase II study showed that the addition of bevacizumab to the first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin (CP) may increase the overall survival (OS) and the time to progression in advanced NSCLC. Based on these promising results, a randomized phase III trial compared the combination of bevacizumab with CP versus CP alone in the treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. The combination of CP plus bevacizumab led to a statistically significant increase in median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with CP alone, with a response rate (RR) in the CP arm of 15% compared with 35% in the bevacizumab plus CP arm (p < 0.001). More recently, the randomized AVAIL (Avastin in Lung Cancer) study, which evaluated cisplatin with gemcitabine plus bevacizumab in two different dosages versus chemotherapy alone in 1043 patients with recurrent or advanced non-squamous NSCLC, reported a significant increase of PFS, RR and duration of response for both of the bevacizumab-containing arms. Bevacizumab has also been investigated in combination with erlitonib as second-line treatment in two small early phase trials, with interesting results. Bevacizumab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; the main treatment-associated adverse events were neutropenia and haemorrhage, especially in the lung, but also at other sites. Several trials that incorporate bevacizumab in combination with new active drugs in NSCLC are ongoing and should further help to define the place of bevacizumab in the therapy of NSCLC.

Phase I study of flavopiridol in combination with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of flavopiridol/ paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as the pharmacokinetics and activity of flavopiridol when used in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients aged 18-75 years with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours followed by carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 over 1 hour and flavopiridol 30-85 mg/m2 over 24 hours every 3 weeks for 3 cycles.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled at 4 sites in the United States and received flavopiridol 30 mg/m2 (n = 3), 50 mg/m2 (n = 6), 70 mg/m2 (n = 3), or 85 mg/m2 (n = 6). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred at the 50-mg/m2 or 70-mg/m2 dose levels. Two patients treated at the 85-mg/m2 dose level experienced cardiovascular events that did not meet the criteria for DLT but were fatal in 1 case, prompting no further flavopiridol dose escalations and establishment of 70 mg/m2 as the maximum tolerated dose. The most frequently reported adverse events across all dose levels combined were nausea (89%), asthenia (67%), and diarrhea (56%). Flavopiridol concentrations increased rapidly, reached a plateau, and showed a multiphasic decline after the 24-hour infusion. Of 12 patients evaluable for efficacy, 8 achieved a partial response, and 4 had stable disease.

CONCLUSION

Flavopiridol in doses <or= 70 mg/m2 in a 24-hour infusion can safely be combined with a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and a 1-hour infusion of carboplatin AUC 5.

Trends and predictors of first-line chemotherapy use among elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States

PURPOSE

This study assessed first-line chemotherapy treatment patterns over time and identified predictors of chemotherapy use and treatment selection among elderly patients with newly diagnosed Stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States.

METHODS

Patients aged 65 years and older newly diagnosed with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC between 1997 and 2002 were identified and followed through 2003 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to evaluate temporal trends in chemotherapy treatment. Multivariate logistic regression models were estimated to identify predictors of chemotherapy treatment and factors associated with use of cisplatin/carboplatin (platinum) and either a taxane or gemcitabine versus other treatments.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy use increased from approximately 28% of Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients diagnosed in 1997 to 36% of patients diagnosed in 2002. Doublet therapy was most commonly used as first-line therapy, received by 74% of chemotherapy-treated patients across all study years. Use of doublet therapy with platinum and either a taxane or gemcitabine also increased over time (with the largest increase for gemcitabine combinations from 0.3% in 1997 to 11.8% in 2002). Males were more likely than females to be treated with chemotherapy (odds ratios [95% CI]: 1.14 [1.06-1.22]), as were patients in the Northeast and South relative to patients in the West (1.24 [1.13-1.36] and 1.33 [1.20-1.47], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Use of first-line chemotherapy treatment among elderly Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients is low, but appears to be increasing, with potential regional and gender differences in treatment. These findings are likely to be of interest to clinicians and policymakers.

Gefitinib plus celecoxib in chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study from the Hoosier Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, has single agent activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical studies demonstrate significant interactions between the EGFR and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) pathways and that simultaneous inhibition may have benefits over EGFR inhibitors alone.

METHODS

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

chemotherapy-naive, stage IIIb (with pleural effusion) or IV NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (PS) 0-1. Patients were treated with gefitinib 250 mg po daily plus celecoxib 400 mg po every 12 hours. Cycles consisted of 21-day treatment and continued until unacceptable toxicity or progression of disease. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate; secondary objectives included estimation of progression free survival, overall survival, and to assess the toxicity of this regimen.

RESULTS

From January 2004 to November 2004, 31 patients were enrolled: male/female 13/18; median age 70 years (range, 19-93); 68% had adenocarcinoma; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 0/1 13/18; stage IIIb/IV 2/29. Two patients died of interstitial lung disease due to treatment. There were three additional deaths during treatment that were not considered treatment related. Two additional patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (elevated liver enzymes). Select grade 3/4 toxicities included: pneumonitis (3%), hepatic (7%), diarrhea (7%), and skin (3%). Response rate was 16% (95% CI, 5-34%), median progression free survival and overall survival were 3.2 (95% CI, 2.7-5.7 months) and 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.7-14.2 months), respectively. All responders were females with adenocarcinoma, two were remote or never smokers and three were former smokers.

CONCLUSION

Gefitinib plus celecoxib in an unselected population of chemotherapy naive patients with advanced NSCLC and a PS of 0-1 has a lower response rate and overall efficacy compared with historical controls of combination chemotherapy.

Combinations of three chemotherapeutic agents and two chemotherapeutic agents plus a targeted biologic agent in the treatment of advanced non small-cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the world. In the United States, more than 28% of all cancer deaths are from lung cancer. In the past decade, a number of new drugs were introduced into the treatment of lung cancer including taxanes, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan. Combinations of one of these drugs with cisplatin, with carboplatin, or with one another were shown to be superior to best supportive care, to single-agent cisplatin, and in some instances, to a podophyllotoxin and cisplatin. Comparisons of the various two-drug combinations showed that they are equivalent in efficacy although there are differences in convenience, cost, and toxicity. Many of these two-drug combinations are less toxic than older combinations, which allowed for the development of three-drug combinations that could be given in full dose and with acceptable toxicity. Phase II trials of several three-drug combinations including carboplatin/paclitaxel/gemcitabine and cisplatin/vinorelbine/gemcitabine showed response rates and survival rates that were somewhat higher than anticipated with a two-drug combination. These data led to three randomized trials of a doublet combination versus a triplet combination. Each of these trials showed a higher response rate and higher toxicity rates with the triplet combination. The toxicity rates were still acceptable with the triplet combinations. The survival was also superior in the triplet arms of each of the randomized trials. Unfortunately, the sample size in each of these studies was small and the survival differences are not statistically significant. Therefore, additional larger randomized trials are sorely needed. During the past decade, new molecularly targeted agents were introduced into the treatment of lung cancer and completed phase I and II trials. Objective responses were noted with many of these new agents. Several combinations of doublet chemotherapy with a new targeted agent have completed phase II trials with encouraging results. Some of these new triplets are now in phase III randomized trials.

Anti-mesothelin immunotoxin SS1P in combination with gemcitabine results in increased activity against mesothelin-expressing tumor xenografts

PURPOSE

To determine the antitumor activity of the anti-mesothelin immunotoxin SS1P in combination with gemcitabine against mesothelin-expressing tumor xenografts.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The in vitro activity of SS1P in combination with gemcitabine against the mesothelin-expressing cell line A431/K5 was evaluated using cytotoxicity and apoptosis assays. The antitumor activity of this combination was evaluated in nude mice bearing A431/K5 tumor xenografts. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with different doses and schedules of gemcitabine alone, SS1P alone (0.2 mg/kg i.v. every other day x three doses), or with both agents together, and tumor volumes were measured over time.

RESULTS

In vitro studies failed to show the synergy of SS1P plus gemcitabine against the mesothelin-expressing A431/K5 cells. In contrast, in the in vivo setting, there was a marked synergy when SS1P was combined with gemcitabine for the treatment of mesothelin-expressing tumor xenografts. This synergy was present using different doses and schedules of gemcitabine administration. In mice treated with fractionated doses of gemcitabine in combination with SS1P, complete tumor regression was observed in all mice and was long-lasting in 60% of the animals. Also, this antitumor activity was specific to SS1P because HA22, an immunotoxin targeting CD22 not expressed on A431/K5 cells, did not increase the efficacy of gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

SS1P in combination with gemcitabine results in marked antitumor activity against mesothelin-expressing tumors. This combination could be potentially useful for the treatment of human cancers that express mesothelin and are responsive to gemcitabine therapy.

Systematic review of symptom control and quality of life in studies on chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: how CONSORTed are the data?

BACKGROUND

The effect of chemotherapy on survival of patients with advanced NSCLC is modest, therefore patient reported outcomes (PRO's) are of high interest in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). CONSORT (CONsolidated Standards On Reporting Trials) is a quality checklist of 22 items for the conduct and reporting of RCTs. The aim of this report was to analyse to what extent the different RCTs with information on PRO's adhere to the CONSORT statement.

METHODS

Systematic review of RCTs using PRO's either as primary or secondary endpoint. Compliance with the (revised) CONSORT statement was checked by 2 independent reviewers by making for each study the simple sum of the 22 CONSORT items, or a weighted score with a maximum rating of 31 points.

RESULTS

The median weighted CONSORT score of the different RCTs was 25, with a remarkable difference from 12 till 30. There was no significant change over time, nor difference between academic and commercial studies, but a significant correlation between CONSORT agreement and journal type (P<0.0001). Adherence to CONSORT was similar for studies comparing chemotherapy with best supportive care alone, comparing different first-line chemotherapies with PRO either as primary or secondary endpoint, or studies looking at second-line chemotherapy. Benefit in PRO's was reported in all of these settings.

CONCLUSION

The overall adherence of peer-reviewed RCTs to CONSORT is reasonable, with nonetheless major differences between journals, and with no clear sign of change over time. Apart from modest survival differences, benefits in PRO endpoints are present in all categories of studies we analysed.

Systemic chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: recent advances and future directions

Systemic therapy improves the survival and quality of life of patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several new therapeutic options have emerged for advanced NSCLC, incorporating novel cytotoxic agents (taxanes, gemcitabine, pemetrexed) and molecular-targeted agents (erlotinib, bevacizumab). Efforts to improve the outcome of first-line therapy for advanced and metastatic NSCLC have primarily focused on the addition of targeted agents to platinum-based two-drug regimens. Bevacizumab, an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, is the first drug to demonstrate superior outcomes when added to systemic chemotherapy in advanced disease. Evaluation of the role of maintenance therapy following four to six cycles of first-line combination chemotherapy is ongoing. Both cytotoxic agents and targeted agents are suitable for evaluation in the maintenance setting. Promising results have been noted with single-agent paclitaxel as maintenance therapy following four cycles of combination therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Phase III studies are now under way to evaluate the roles of gemcitabine, pemetrexed, and erlotinib as maintenance therapies for patients who experience a response or disease stabilization after four cycles of combination chemotherapy. Whether this approach will be successful in extending the survival of a select group of patients remains to be seen.

Interstitial lung disease in Japanese patients with lung cancer: a cohort and nested case-control study

RATIONALE

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurs in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving gefitinib.

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate risk factors for ILD in Japanese patients with NSCLC during treatment with gefitinib or chemotherapy.

METHODS

In a prospective epidemiologic cohort, 3,166 Japanese patients with advanced/recurrent NSCLC were followed for 12 weeks on 250 mg gefitinib (n = 1,872 treatment periods) or chemotherapy (n = 2,551). Patients who developed acute ILD (n = 122) and randomly selected control subjects (n = 574) entered a case-control study. Adjusted incidence rate ratios were estimated from case-control data by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression. Crude (observed) incidence rates and risks were calculated from cohort data.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The observed (unadjusted) incidence rate over 12 weeks was 2.8 (95% CI, 2.3-3.3) per 1,000 person-weeks, 4.5 (3.5-5.4) for gefitinib versus 1.7 (1.2-2.2) for chemotherapy; the corresponding observed naive cumulative incidence rates at the end of 12-week follow-up were 4.0% (3.0-5.1%) and 2.1% (1.5-2.9%), respectively. Adjusted for imbalances in risk factors between treatments, the overall OR for gefitinib versus chemotherapy was 3.2 (1.9-5.4), elevated chiefly during the first 4 weeks (3.8 [1.9-7.7]). Other ILD risk factors in both groups included the following: older age, poor World Health Organization performance status, smoking, recent NSCLC diagnosis, reduced normal lung on computed tomography scan, preexisting chronic ILD, concurrent cardiac disease. ILD-related deaths in patients with ILD were 31.6% (gefitinib) versus 27.9% (chemotherapy); adjusted OR, 1.05 (95% CI, 0.3-3.2).

CONCLUSIONS

ILD was relatively common in these Japanese patients with NSCLC during therapy with gefitinib or chemotherapy, being higher in the older, smoking patient with preexisting ILD or poor performance status. The risk of developing ILD was higher with gefitinib than chemotherapy, mainly in the first 4 weeks.

10-year update on chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A 1995 meta analysis of chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell carcinoma indicated clinical benefit from cisplatin based chemotherapy. Subsequent studies have aimed to increase the efficacy or decrease the toxicity of chemotherapy.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Illustrative studies and meta analyses of different aspects of chemotherapy which have taken place over the last decade, are reviewed.

RESULTS

The use of novel (third generation) chemotherapy agents has resulted in a further increase in patient survival. Gemcitabine was shown to be associated with an increase in progression free survival when compared to other third generation agents as well as a strong tendency to increased overall survival. An increase in survival was also shown with doublet chemotherapy regimes as compared to the use of single agents only. The use of triplet agent chemotherapy results in no further increased survival, but increased toxicity. Cisplatin is associated with increased survival over carboplatin based chemotherapy regimens when third generation agents are used, but increased nausea and vomiting. Non-platin third generation combinations give equivalent survival to platin-based regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

First line chemotherapy given to patients with advanced NSCLC should be two-drug combination regimen. Non-platin containing regimens may be used as an alternative to platinum based regimens in the first line.

Cellular pharmacology of gemcitabine

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluoro 2'-deoxycytidine, dFdC) is the most important cytidine analogue developed since cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C). The evidence of its potent antitumor activity in a wide spectrum of in vitro and in vivo tumor models has been successfully confirmed in the clinical setting. Despite structural and pharmacological similarities to Ara-C, gemcitabine displays distinctive features of cellular pharmacology, metabolism and mechanism of action. Following influx through the cell membrane via nucleoside transporters, gemcitabine undergoes complex intracellular conversion to the nucleotides gemcitabine diphosphate (dFdCDP) and triphosphate (dFdCTP) responsible for its cytotoxic actions. The cytotoxic activity of gemcitabine may be the result of several actions on DNA synthesis. dFdCTP competes with deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP) as an inhibitor of DNA polymerase. dFdCDP is a potent inhibitor of ribonucleoside reductase, resulting in depletion of deoxyribonucleotide pools necessary for DNA synthesis and, thereby potentiating the effects of dFdCTP. dFdCTP is incorporated into DNA and after the incorporation of one more nucleotide leads to DNA strand termination. This extra nucleotide may be important in hiding the dFdCTP from DNA repair enzymes, as incorporation of dFdCTP into DNA appears to be resistant to the normal mechanisms of DNA repair. Gemcitabine can be effectively inactivated mainly by the action of deoxycytidine deaminase to 2,2'-difluorodeoxyuridine. Also, 5'-nucleotidase opposes the action of nucleoside kinases by catalysing the conversion of nucleotides back to nucleosides. Additional sites of action and self-potentiating effects have been described. Evidence that up- or down-regulation of the multiple membrane transporters, target enzymes, enzymes involved in the metabolism of gemcitabine and alterations in the apoptotic pathways may confer sensitivity/resistance to this drug, has been provided in experimental models and more recently also in the clinical setting. Synergism between gemcitabine and several other antineoplastic agents has been demonstrated in experimental models based on specific pharmacodynamic interactions. Knowledge of gemcitabine cellular pharmacology and its molecular mechanisms of resistance and drug interaction may thus be pivotal to a more rational clinical use of this drug in combination regimens and in tailored therapy.

Review of the pemetrexed and gemcitabine combination in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed is a new multitargeted antifolate that can be easily administered as a 10-min infusion every 3 weeks. The use of folic acid, vitamin B(12), and corticoid prophylaxis has significantly reduced pemetrexed-induced toxicity. Single-agent pemetrexed has shown antitumor activity in a wide range of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Association with vinorelbine, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin have been tried, but the pemetrexed and gemcitabine combination, an easy to administer cisplatin-free doublet, has been documented in many phase 2 trials in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. In vitro cytotoxic assays and phase I studies have defined several schedules of administration for pemetrexed and gemcitabine. The recommended dose is pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 or 8, and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8, but it is unknown if pemetrexed should precede or follow gemcitabine and at what time interval. Published studies have failed to show significant differences in overall survival times despites response rates oscillating between 15% and 41%. The main toxicities are neutropenia, fatigue, skin rashes and elevated transaminases and seem to occur with similar rates in the many phase 2 trials. Hopes for the future are in tailored chemotherapy, since molecular markers of sensitivity are available for gemcitabine and pemetrexed, allowing to determinate in the future which patients will be most likely to benefit from the gemcitabine-pemetrexed doublet.

Pharmacogenomics and gemcitabine

Approximately half of lung cancer patients present with metastases, and a large proportion will develop recurrent disease, with median survival to cisplatin-based chemotherapy of 11 months. No predictive factor of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy is yet available in clinical practice. The nucleotide excision repair system plays a major role in repairing a variety of distorting lesions, notably platinum-induced DNA adducts. ERCC1 is a leading gene in repairing cisplatin DNA damage. We carried out three different studies examining individually the role of ERCC1, RRM1, and then both, mRNA expression in paraffin-embedded pretreatment bronchial biopsies from gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Median survival was significantly prolonged in patients with low levels of ERCC1 or RRM1. BRCA1 is involved in homologous recombination repair, and we observed that low levels of BRCA1 mRNA significantly increased survival in gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated patients. Our observations lead us to recommend that tumors be regularly assessed for ERCC1 and BRCA1 mRNA expression in order to customize gemcitabine/cisplatin treatment.

Eicosanoid modulation in advanced lung cancer: cyclooxygenase-2 expression is a positive predictive factor for celecoxib + chemotherapy--Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 30203

PURPOSE

Increased expression of eicosanoids in cancer has been associated with adverse prognosis. We performed a randomized phase II trial to test the hypothesis that inhibitors of two eicosanoid pathways (cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2], celecoxib and 5-lipoxygenase [5-LOX], zileuton) added to chemotherapy would improve outcome in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC, a performance status of 0 to 2, and no prior therapy were eligible. All patients received carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5.5 mg/mL x min day 1 + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) days 1 and 8. Patients were randomly assigned to: (a) zileuton 600 mg PO qid, (b) celecoxib 400 mg PO bid, or (c) celecoxib and zileuton at the same doses. Immunohistochemical staining for COX-2 and 5-LOX was performed without knowledge of outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred forty patients were entered and 134 were eligible and treated. There was no survival difference between the arms. COX-2 expression was a negative prognostic marker for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.51, P = .019 for index >or= 4; HR = 4.16, P = .005 for index = 9) for patients not receiving celecoxib. Patients with increased COX-2 expression (index >or= 4), receiving celecoxib had better survival than did COX-2-expressing patients not receiving drug (HR = .342, P = .005 for OS; HR = .294, P = .002 for failure-free survival). Multivariate analysis confirmed the interaction of COX-2 and celecoxib on survival. 5-LOX expression was neither prognostic nor predictive.

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate the value of dual eicosanoid inhibition or benefit from either agent alone in addition to chemotherapy. However, a prospectively defined subset analysis suggests an advantage for celecoxib and chemotherapy for patients with moderate to high COX-2 expression.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) and gemcitabine in patients with refractory solid tumors

PURPOSE

Preclinical data shows improvements in response for the combination of imatinib mesylate (IM, Gleevec) and gemcitabine (GEM) therapy compared with GEM alone. Our goals were to determine the maximum tolerated dose of GEM and IM in combination, the pharmacokinetics of GEM in the absence and in the presence of IM, and IM pharmacokinetics in this combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with refractory malignancy, intact intestinal absorption, measurable/evaluable disease, adequate organ function, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 0-2, and signed informed consent were eligible. Initially, treatment consisted of 600 mg/m2 of GEM (10 mg/m2/min) on days 1, 8, and 15, and 300 mg of IM daily every 28 days. Due to excessive toxicity, the schedule was altered to IM on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12, and GEM on days 3 and 10 every 21 days. Two final cohorts received IM on days 1 to 5, 8 to 12, and 15 to 19.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were treated. IM and GEM given daily at 500 to 600 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 produced frequent dose-limiting toxicities. With the modified scheduling, GEM given at 1,500 mg/m2/150 min was deliverable, along with 400 mg of IM, without dose-limiting toxicities. Three partial (laryngeal, renal, and mesothelioma) and two minor (renal and pancreatic) responses were noted at GEM doses of 450 to 1,500 mg/m2. Stable disease >24 weeks was seen in 17 patients. CA19-9 in 7 of 10 patients with pancreatic cancer was reduced by approximately 90%. IM did not significantly alter GEM pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSION

The addition of intermittently dosed IM to GEM at low to full dose was associated with broad antitumor activity and little increase in toxicity.

Cetuximab in non-small cell lung cancer

Advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains a challenge to treat due to its high local and systemic recurrence. The overall survival remains poor despite the approval of several new chemotherapeutic agents in the management of advanced NSCLC. Overexpression or mutations in the EGFR have been shown to be associated with a significant percentage of NSCLC. The development of targeted agents, such as cetuximab, against the EGFR is therefore a rational objective. Several preclinical and clinical studies suggest that cetuximab is active against NSCLC. This paper reviews the application of cetuximab in NSCLC.

Prospective phase II trial of a combination of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine with cisplatin and UFT as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

The standard chemotherapy for non-elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is platinum-based doublet combination therapy. Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that infusion at the fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10mg/(m(2)min) may be more effective than a standard 30-min infusion of gemcitabine. In addition, oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) was associated with a survival advantage in the adjuvant setting. Therefore, we performed a phase II study using the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and UFT as first-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with a performance status of 0-2 and were chemotherapy-naive. Gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2), 10mg/(m(2)min) on days 1 and 8, respectively) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) on day 1) were injected intravenously and UFT (400mg/day) was administered orally on days 1-14. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Primary endpoint was overall response rate and secondary endpoints were overall survival, time to progression and safety profile.

RESULT

Thirty-seven patients were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (range: 44-72 years). The performance status was 0 in 4, 1 in 30, and 2 in 3 patients. Twenty-three patients completed six cycles. Complete response was achieved in one (3%) patient, partial response in 17 (46%) patients, and stable disease in 10 (27%) patients. The overall response rate was 48.6% on an intention-to-treat basis and 54.5% of patients in whom a response evaluation was possible (n=33). The median survival time was 14.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2-18.2), the 1-year survival rate was 54% and the median time to progression was 5.4 months (95% CI 4.3-6.4). Toxicities were moderate and mostly hematological adverse events. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 37% of patients and four patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 19% and 5% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicities were mild.

CONCLUSION

The combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and UFT is an active and well-tolerated first-line regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin as neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A phase II study

The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is one of the most active chemotherapy regimens against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin in a 3-week cycle regimen for patients with operable, early stage NSCLC. Gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for 3 cycles, followed by cisplatin at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 was administered to patients with previously untreated, operable, early stage (IB-IIIA) NSCLC. A total of 47 patients (46 male, mean age 56.0+/-8.0 years) who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled. The pathological complete response rate was 5.3% of operated patients and 4.3% of total patients. At visit 4, 57.1% of the patients had partial response, 38.1%, stable disease and 4.8%, progressive disease. The main toxicities - leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia - were usually clinically asymptomatic and did not require hospitalization. Non-hematological toxicities were minimal and manageable. Disease free and 12-month overall survival rates were over 70% and 80%, respectively. This study demonstrates that the administration of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination for 3 cycles is effective and tolerable for patients with operable, early stage NSCLC. Low toxicity profile and promising survival outcome suggest that this regimen has an encouraging activity in this subset of patients.

Second or third additional chemotherapy drug for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with advanced disease

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have demonstrated that adding a drug to a single-agent or to a two-agent regimen increased the tumor response rate in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although its impact on survival remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical benefit of adding a drug to a single-agent or two-agent chemotherapy regimen in terms of tumor response rate, survival, and toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

There were no language restrictions. Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were performed using the search terms non-small cell lung carcinoma/drug therapy, adenocarcinoma, large-cell carcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma, lung, neoplasms, clinical trial phase III, and randomized trial. Manual searches were also performed to find conference proceedings published between January 1982 and June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Data from all randomized controlled trials performed between 1980 and 2006 (published between January 1980 and June 2006) comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen or comparing a triplet regimen with a doublet regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent investigators reviewed the publications and extracted the data. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for the objective tumor response rate, one-year survival rate, and toxicity rate were calculated using the fixed-effect model. Pooled median ratios (MRs) for median survival also were calculated using the fixed-effect model. ORs and MRs lower than unity (< 1.0) indicate a benefit of a doublet regimen compared with a single-agent regimen (or a triplet regimen compared with a doublet regimen).

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five trials (13601 patients) were eligible. In the trials comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen, a significant increase was observed in tumor response (OR 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37 to 0.47, P < 0.001) and one-year survival (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.91, P < 0.001) in favor of the doublet regimen. The median survival ratio was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.89, P < 0.001). An increase also was observed in the tumor response rate (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.75, P < 0.001) in favor of the triplet regimen, but not for one-year survival (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.21, P = 0.88). The median survival ratio was 1.00 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.06, P = 0.97).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adding a second drug improved tumor response and survival rate. Adding a third drug had a weaker effect on tumor response and no effect on survival.

Gemcitabine administered as a short infusion versus a fixed dose rate in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Previous studies have indicated that, in combination with cisplatin, fixed dose rate gemcitabine may be more efficacious than standard infusion gemcitabine. This open-label, randomised phase II study was aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these regimens as treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Latin American patients. Sixty-four patients were randomised to receive up to six cycles of treatment with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1 plus either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (standard arm, N=33) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (FDR arm, N=31). In the standard arm, 9 of 33 (27%) patients responded compared with 6 of 30 (20%) patients in the FDR arm (odds ratio: 0.67, 95% CI, 0.21-2.2; p=0.56). Median overall survival was 7.5 months in the standard arm and 9.9 months in the FDR arm. One-year survival rates were 35% and 37% in the standard arm and the FDR arm, respectively. Patients in the FDR arm experienced more grade 3/4 haematological toxicity than those in the standard arm (48% versus 21%). The results of this trial do not support FDR administration of gemcitabine in preference to the standard administration in Latin American patients with NSCLC.

Lung cancer in elderly patients: A retrospective analysis of practice in a single institution

Incidence of non-small cell lung cancer is increasing especially among elderly with about 40% arising in patients over 70 years old. Most of these elderly patients are under treated. Seventy-one patients with lung cancer over 70 years old were treated in Institut Paoli-Calmettes from January 2000 until December 2003 (male/female: 57/14). Median age was 75.5 years (70-92). OMS 0-1-2-3=4.2-60.6-25.4-4.2%, respectively. Comorbidities were represented by arterial hypertension, coronaropathy, cardiac failure, thrombo-embolism, respiratory failure, diabetes, vascular cerebral dysfunction, and renal failure. 29.6% of patients were without comorbidity, and 14.1% had at least three comorbidities. The averages of the Charlson comorbidity score and the Age-Charlson comorbidity score were 3.4 and 6.6, respectively. Histological characteristics: epidermoïd/adenocarcinoma/undifferentiated/small cells: 39.4%/26.8%/15.5%/9.9%. Most of them were advanced lung cancer: St IIIB=14 (19.7%) and St IV=37 (52.1%). Forty-six patients received chemotherapy (64.8%) with 40 patients (86.9%) with platin (carboplatin or cisplatin). The median number of treatment cycles was 4.1 (range 1-7). Two patients achieved complete response and 15 had partial response. The response rate was 39.6%. The 1-year survival rate was 48.5% and the estimated median survival time was 11 months (95%; 7-18 months) for all patients. The 1-year survival rate was 75% and 21.6% and the estimated median survival time was 25.9 months (95%; 12.6, ND) and 5.7 months (95%; 4.2-9.6) for stage IIIB and IV, respectively. Toxicities were judged acceptable with 19 hospitalizations after chemotherapy, for 16 patients who represent 34.8% of patients who received chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy is feasible in elderly patients with lung cancer. Patients should be evaluated for chemotherapy based on their performance status and comorbidities especially with geriatric assessment rather than age alone. The chemotherapy with platinum seems to be tolerable and effective.

Third-generation chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To estimate the efficacy of third-generation (3G) chemotherapy agents (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan) on response and survival in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed using trials identified through MEDLINE. Results on tumor response and survival were collected from randomized trials comparing 3G monotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC), 3G monotherapy versus second-generation (2G) platinum-based regimens, and 3G platinum-based regimens versus 2G platinum-based regimens.

RESULTS

Of the 2480 citations screened, 20 randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 19 trials were used in the analyses. The data from two, three-arm trials were used in two different comparisons. Five trials (n = 1029 patients) compared 3G monotherapy with BSC. The summary risk difference (RD) for 1-year survival favored 3G agents by 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2%, 12%). Four trials (n = 871 patients) compared treatment with 3G monotherapy versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The response RD was -6% (95% CI: -11%, 0%), and the 1-year survival rate RD was 3% (95% CI: -3%, 10%), suggesting that despite a slightly higher response rate for 2G platinum-based regimens relative to 3G monotherapy, there is equivalency in survival. Twelve trials (n = 3995) compared 3G versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The RD for response was 12% (95% CI: 10%, 15%). A RD for 1-year was not calculated, because of heterogeneity among the trials. A subset analysis of 3G versus 2G platinum-based doublets revealed a 1-year survival-rate RD of 6% (95% CI: 2%, 10%), favoring 3G platinum-based regimens without evidence of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

3G agents have been a significant advance in the treatment of NSCLC.

Sequential Chemotherapy with Combination Irinotecan and Cisplatin Followed by Docetaxel for Treatment-Naïve Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Sequential administration of platinum-based doublet therapy and then a taxane may reduce the risk of drug resistance and, therefore, improve treatment outcome. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sequential administration of irinotecan and cisplatin and then docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eligible patients received irinotecan in 60-mg/m2 infusions for 30 to 60 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15, and cisplatin in 75-mg/m2 infusions for 60 minutes on day 1 every 28 days for four cycles (IC). Regardless of the response, patients received up to four cycles of sequential docetaxel in 75-mg/m2 infusions for 60 minutes.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients with histologically confirmed chemotherapy-naïve stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled, of whom 42 were evaluable. The response rate at completion of chemotherapy with IC was 45.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.2%-60.3%). Five patients had improvement of disease status during sequential docetaxel, and seven patients had disease progression. Progression-free survival was 8.0 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.9 months), and the overall median survival was 14.6 months (95% CI: 9.8-17.9 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 54.3%, 22.6%, and 12.1%, respectively. The incidence of severe (> or =CTC V2 grade 3) neutropenia during IC was 23.9% compared with 95.7% for sequential docetaxel (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Sequential administration of IC and then docetaxel is feasible and is associated with a prolonged progression-free survival, but the current data do not confirm an improvement in treatment outcome by the sequential approach.

Economic evaluation of docetaxel/gemcitabine versus docetaxel as frontline treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Greece

OBJECTIVES

The combination of docetaxel/gemcitabine is an acceptable chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. An economic evaluation is undertaken alongside a multi-centre randomized phase III trial, which compares docetaxel/gemcitabine combination with docetaxel monotherapy, in untreated patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Trial resource utilisation data are combined with unit price data used to evaluate the cost of chemotherapy, concomitant medications, hospitalisations, diagnostic and laboratory tests and second-line chemotherapy. Treatment cost is combined with survival to estimate the incremental cost per-life-year-saved with the combination therapy versus monotherapy. To deal with uncertainty, stochastic analysis is used to plot cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

RESULTS

Median survival is 9.1 months (range 1-36.2) and 8.3 months (range 1-26.8) (p: 0.025) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively. The mean total treatment cost of patients with docetaxel is estimated at Euro5736 and with docetaxel/gemcitabine at Euro7417, a difference of Euro1542 (95%CI: Euro499-2561). The incremental cost per-life-year-saved of the combination therapy is euro9538 and the probability to be cost-effective is 91% at a threshold of Euro20,000, 97% at a threshold of Euro35,000 and 98% at a threshold of Euro50,000.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support that docetaxel/gemcitabine combination represents a cost-effective treatment option in relation to docetaxel monotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in the Greek NHS setting.