Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer

Single-dose pegfilgrastim is comparable to daily filgrastim in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells: a case-matched study in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies

Pegfilgrastim (PEGFIL) has been found to be comparable to daily filgrastim (FIL) in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. In the present study, we evaluated the ability of PEGFIL to mobilize stem cells in 38 consecutive patients with lymphoproliferative diseases (multiple myeloma, n = 18; lymphomas, n = 15; chronic lymphocytic leukemia, n = 5). Patients were mobilized using PEGFIL (6-18 mg as a single dose) during 2005-2006; 32 then received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. PEGFIL-mobilized patients were matched by age, disease, and treatment line at a ratio of 1:2 to historical FIL-mobilized controls. The primary study endpoint was the blood CD34(+) concentration at onset of leukapheresis. Leukapheresis began a median of 10 days from the beginning of mobilization chemotherapy in both groups. At the onset of leukapheresis, median blood CD34(+) cell counts did not differ significantly in the FIL group compared with the PEGFIL group (79 x 10(6)/L vs 64 x 10(6)/L, respectively; p = 0.44). In the different disease categories, the respective CD34(+) cell counts after FIL and PEGFIL mobilization were 72 x 10(6)/L vs 123 x 10(6)/L (p = 0.08) in myeloma, 51 x 10(6)/L vs 62 x 10(6)/L (p = 0.6) in lymphomas, and 27 x 10(6)/L vs 30 x 10(6)/L (p = 0.62) in CLL, respectively. The target CD34(+) cell yield was harvested with one leukapheresis in 53% of PEGFIL-mobilized patients. Engraftment after autografting did not differ significantly in the two groups. Stem cell mobilization with a single dose of PEGFIL was, therefore, comparable to that achieved using daily FIL in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. PEGFIL is a more practical way to mobilize stem cells than daily FIL.

Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study

Daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors [(G-CSFs); e.g. filgrastim, lenograstim] are frequently used to reduce the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer patients. A pegylated formulation of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, which is administered once per cycle, was introduced in Spain in 2003. LEARN was a multi-centre, retrospective, observational study in Spain comparing patterns of use of daily G-CSF and pegfilgrastim, and CIN-related outcomes in adults with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Outcome measures were the percentage of patients receiving G-CSF for primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis/treatment, duration of treatment with G-CSF and incidence of CIN-related complications. Medical records from consecutive patients with documented pegfilgrastim (n = 75) or daily G-CSF (n = 111) use during 2003 were included. The proportion of patients receiving primary or secondary prophylaxis was comparable between the pegfilgrastim (39 and 48% respectively) and daily G-CSF (40 and 48% respectively) groups. However, there was a trend towards less frequent use to treat a neutropenic event such as FN or neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim group (17 versus 30% with daily G-CSF). Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related complications were less frequent in patients receiving pegfilgrastim (e.g. FN 11 versus 24% with daily G-CSF). This is the first study to show the potential benefits of pegfilgrastim over daily G-CSF in Spanish clinical practice.

XM02 is superior to placebo and equivalent to Neupogen in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia in cycle 1 in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy

Background

Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) such as Filgrastim are used to treat chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. We investigated a new G-CSF, XM02, and compared it to Neupogen™ after myelotoxic chemotherapy in breast cancer (BC) patients.

Methods

A total of 348 patients with BC receiving docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy were randomised to treatment with daily injections (subcutaneous 5 μg/kg/day) for at least 5 days and a maximum of 14 days in each cycle of XM02 (n = 140), Neupogen™ (n = 136) or placebo (n = 72). The primary endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1.

Results

The mean DSN in cycle 1 was 1.1, 1.1, and 3.9 days in the XM02, Neupogen™, and placebo group, respectively. Superiority of XM02 over placebo and equivalence of XM02 with Neupogen™ could be demonstrated. Toxicities were similar between XM02 and Neupogen™.

Conclusion

XM02 was superior to placebo and equivalent to Neupogen™ in reducing DSN after myelotoxic chemotherapy.

Trial Registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN02270769

Biological therapy for pediatric malignancy: current perspectives

Biologicals are defined as agents that are either uniquely or partially tumor-specific. Great expectations were raised by the success in agents that target a specific genetic translocation: all-trans retinoic acid, targeting the chronic myeloid leukemia retinoic acid receptor in acute promyelocytic leukemia and imatinib, a small molecule targeting the BCR-ABL translocation in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Thus far, the search for similar "druggable" genetic targets in pediatric cancers has not yet resulted in such dramatic results. The rarity of pediatric cancer as well as ethical considerations necessitate that the agents for testing be carefully and rigorously selected. Biologicals present an additional challenge, as they often do not lend themselves to in vitro testing. Early approaches to specific targeting of solid tumors utilized monoclonal antibodies. The microenvironment provides an interesting new biological approach to treating tumors and alteration of the host immune response provides another avenue. Biological agents are a step forward in supportive care to reduce the hematological toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and to manage the frequent infectious complications.

A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial

Background

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are often neutropenic as a result of their disease. Furthermore, these patients typically experience profound neutropenia following induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy and this may result in serious, potentially life-threatening, infection. This randomized, double-blind, phase 2 clinical trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim for assisting neutrophil recovery following induction and consolidation chemotherapy for de novo AML in patients with low-to-intermediate risk cytogenetics.

Methods

Patients (n = 84) received one or two courses of standard induction chemotherapy (idarubicin + cytarabine), followed by one course of consolidation therapy (high-dose cytarabine) if complete remission was achieved. They were randomized to receive either single-dose pegfilgrastim 6 mg or daily filgrastim 5 μg/kg, beginning 24 hours after induction and consolidation chemotherapy.

Results

The median time to recovery from severe neutropenia was 22.0 days for both pegfilgrastim (n = 42) and filgrastim (n = 41) groups during Induction 1 (difference 0.0 days; 95% CI: -1.9 to 1.9). During Consolidation, recovery occurred after a median of 17.0 days for pegfilgrastim versus 16.5 days for filgrastim (difference 0.5 days; 95% CI: -1.1 to 2.1). Therapeutic pegfilgrastim serum concentrations were maintained throughout neutropenia. Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of filgrastim.

Conclusion

These data suggest no clinically meaningful difference between a single dose of pegfilgrastim and multiple daily doses of filgrastim for shortening the duration of severe neutropenia following chemotherapy in de novo AML patients with low-to-intermediate risk cytogenetics.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00114764

Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia: Opportunities for Pharmacist Involvement

Purpose

This article highlights the clinical impact of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and reviews the clinical evidence supporting the updated guideline recommendations from leading scientific organizations that focus on cancer care regarding the use of myeloid growth factors to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) from chemotherapy. The aim is to provide insight for practicing pharmacists regarding how they can be more proactive in developing best-practice strategies for the management of CIN as well as the prevention of FN.

Summary

CIN, the primary dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy, is common in many tumor types that are treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy and occurs with the greatest frequency in the first cycle of treatment. Treatment with myeloid growth factors, or colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), has shown to be effective in reducing the risk, severity, and duration of FN from chemotherapy. Despite recent revisions to various clinical guidelines that have resulted in alignment on the recommendation for prophylactic CSF use in patients with a greater than or equal to 20% risk of developing FN, a gap remains between actual clinical usage and best practice. Pharmacists are key members of multidisciplinary health care teams and are uniquely positioned to evaluate current practice and develop strategies that ensure appropriate CSF use. This paper summarizes the recent changes to CSF guidelines, reviews clinical data that support those changes, and discusses strategies for pharmacist involvement in the management of CIN and FN prevention using real-world examples of improvement initiatives.

Conclusion

Neutropenia is a dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy that has significant implications for effective cancer treatment and patient health outcomes. Pharmacists are uniquely positioned to perform various interventions, which help ensure appropriate CSF use and improve the management of CIN.

Canadian supportive care recommendations for the management of neutropenia in patients with cancer

Hematologic toxicities of cancer chemotherapy are common and often limit the ability to provide treatment in a timely and dose-intensive manner. These limitations may be of utmost importance in the adjuvant and curative intent settings. Hematologic toxicities may result in febrile neutropenia, infections, fatigue, and bleeding, all of which may lead to additional complications and prolonged hospitalization. The older cancer patient and patients with significant comorbidities may be at highest risk of neutropenic complications. Colony-stimulating factors (csfs) such as filgrastim and pegfilgrastim can effectively attenuate most of the neutropenic consequences of chemotherapy, improve the ability to continue chemotherapy on the planned schedule, and minimize the risk of febrile neutropenia and infectious morbidity and mortality. The present consensus statement reviews the use of csfs in the management of neutropenia in patients with cancer and sets out specific recommendations based on published international guidelines tailored to the specifics of the Canadian practice landscape. We review existing international guidelines, the indications for primary and secondary prophylaxis, the importance of maintaining dose intensity, and the use of csfs in leukemia, stem-cell transplantation, and radiotherapy. Specific disease-related recommendations are provided related to breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, lung cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer. Finally, csf dosing and schedules, duration of therapy, and associated acute and potential chronic toxicities are examined.

Rational Selection of Patients for Antibacterial Prophylaxis After Chemotherapy

Purpose

The SIGNIFICANT (Simple Investigation in Neutropenic Individuals of the Frequency of Infection after Chemotherapy ± Antibiotic in a Number of Tumours) trial reported a reduction in febrile episodes (FEs) among 1,565 patients with solid cancers and lymphomas receiving cyclical, myelosuppressive chemotherapy (causing grade 4 neutropenia) in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of levofloxacin (P = .01). In response to concerns that increased antibacterial prescribing selects for microbial resistance, we examined our data to explore the rationale for more limited prophylaxis.

Patients and Methods

The risk of FE was calculated for control patients on first versus nonfirst cycles, with or without first-cycle FE, and within subgroups defined by cancer type, performance status (PS), age, and treatment context (adjuvant v nonadjuvant). Using the randomized trial data, the prophylactic efficacy of levofloxacin was examined for the same subgroups.

Results

The per-cycle FE incidence was much lower on nonfirst (3.3%) versus first cycles (8.0%). Prophylaxis was less effective for nonfirst (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78; P = .16) compared with first cycles (OR = 0.42; P < .001). However, FE on cycle 1 predicted a much higher risk of FE and a trend to continued prophylactic efficacy on subsequent cycles. FE rate was greatest for testicular cancer (27.9%), then small-cell lung cancer (17.3%), and lowest for breast cancer (11.5%). Prophylactic efficacy was consistent across age, sex, PS, treatment context, and disease type (except possibly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma).

Conclusion

Under pressure to limit antibacterial use, these exploratory data support offering prophylactic levofloxacin on cycle 1 only of myelosuppressive cancer chemotherapy and on subsequent cycles after a cycle-1 fever. Prophylactic levofloxacin is effective regardless of age, PS, or tumor type.

Review of the value of colony stimulating factors for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenic episodes in adult patients treated for haematological malignancies

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a major dose-limiting toxicity of systemic cancer chemotherapy that can lead to fever and infection, requiring prompt analysis and in-patient treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Complicated neutropenia may lead to reduction and/or delay of systemic anti-cancer treatment, which may compromise outcome. Haematopoietic growth factors have the ability to augment haematopoietic cell cycling and are used to facilitate more dose-intense treatments and to decrease treatment-related complications. This review focuses on randomised trials that investigated the use of colony-stimulating factors (CSF) to prevent treatment-related febrile complications in haematological malignancies in (younger) adult patients. In general, these studies demonstrated that CSF reduced the duration of severe neutropenia but not always its febrile complications; therefore inconsistent results regarding clinically relevant reduction of hospitalisation, duration of therapeutic antibiotics, infection-related or disease-related mortality and economic effects were reported. Current developments in treatment of haematological malignancies will pose new challenges as a shift in infectious pathogens can be expected.

Pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with solid tumours and lymphomas

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim administered as haematological support after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, we compared 44 patients with solid tumours and lymphomas receiving a 6-mg single dose of pegfilgrastim on day +5 after transplantation to a historical control group of 25 patients receiving filgrastim 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) starting on day +5. There were no significant differences in haematological recovery nor in the incidence and duration of neutropenic fever. Median duration of grade 4 neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim group was similar. The incidence of grade III-IV mucositis was lower in pegfilgrastim than in filgrastim group due to the significant difference observed among the patients with solid tumours (p = 0.00). The only adverse event considered to be cytokine related was mild to moderate bone pain occurring during haematological recovery. According to the present study design and taking into account the current prices in our institution, the cost of the two drugs was similar in both treatment groups. In conclusion, a single injection of pegfilgrastim administered at day +5 post-transplantation shows comparable safety and efficacy profiles to daily injections of filgrastim and may be cost effective.

Kinetics of peg-filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Peg-filgrastim is a form of G-CSF with a sustained duration of action due to self-limited clearance. We administered 6 mg peg-filgrastim to 18 autograft recipients on day +1 after transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and during transplantation. Hematopoietic recovery and clinical outcomes were compared to the historical data of 54 patients not receiving G-CSF. Patients receiving peg-filgrastim achieved a serum level of 115 000 pg/ml on day +2, 24 h after drug administration. Drug level maintained a plateau until day +8 and, after day +10, declined concomitantly with myeloid recovery. Patients experienced prompt neutrophil recovery: days +9 and +10 to 500 and 1000 neutrophils per microliter, and 4 days with an absolute neutrophil count <100 cells per microliter. Duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly shortened, but we did not observe significant differences in other end points. In conclusion, peg-filgrastim was well tolerated and efficacious, and hastened myeloid recovery.

Neutropenic events in community practices reduced by first and subsequent cycle pegfilgrastim use

The impact of first- and subsequent-cycle growth factor use in the community setting has not been studied extensively. We conducted this large, prospective, noncomparative study to assess neutropenia and related complications in patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support in community practices. Patients > or = 18 years old with cancers other than leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome, including those with major comorbidities, were eligible. Pegfilgrastim (6 mg) was to be administered approximately 24 hours after chemotherapy in all cycles (minimum, four cycles). A total of 2,112 patients was included in the analyses. The most common tumor types were breast cancer (46%), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (15%), and non-small cell lung cancer (13%). Chemotherapies administered most often were a platinum plus a taxane (18%), and anthracycline plus an alkylating agent (18%), and a taxane plus an anthracycline plus an alkylating agent (16%). The percentage of patients with neutropenia-related hospitalization was 2.9% in cycle 1 and 5.6% across all cycles. Chemotherapy dose reductions and delays were attributed to neutropenia in 1.8% and 0.9% of patients, respectively, in cycle 2 and 2.9% and 2.1% of patients, respectively, across all cycles. Febrile neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1.0 x 10(9)/l with temperature > or = 38.2 degrees C) occurred in 3.6% of patients in cycle 1 and in 6.3% of patients across all cycles. The most frequently reported serious adverse events were febrile neutropenia (3.4%), neutropenia (2.6%), and dehydration (2.6%). Bone pain (0.1%) was the only related serious adverse event reported in more than one patient. Data from this community-based study suggest that patients undergoing chemotherapy benefit from pegfilgrastim support beginning in the first cycle of chemotherapy.

Assessment of neutropenia-related quality of life in a clinical setting

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To examine how neutropenia affects quality of life (QOL) and explore strategies to assess neutropenia-related QOL in clinical practice.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles, abstracts, conference proceedings, and clinical practice guidelines.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Neutropenia can have a detrimental effect on the QOL of patients receiving chemotherapy. A neutropenia-related QOL questionnaire can help nurses better identify patients at risk for developing neutropenia and monitor patients who already have it. In some cases, the questionnaire may be the first step in the initiation of interventions to improve patient care. Ideally, the QOL questionnaire should be easy to use, provide clinically meaningful information, and be easily adapted from existing QOL measurement tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective implementation of QOL assessments into clinical practice can lead to the initiation of interventions that may improve neutropenia-related QOL in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses can enhance their clinical judgment and affect patient treatment by implementing a questionnaire that assesses patients' neutropenia-related QOL.

Effects of site-specific polyethylene glycol modification of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on its biologic activities

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) is a long-chain cytokine that is administered to stimulate the production of white blood cells (WBCs) to reduce the risk of serious infection in immunocompromized patients. However, to achieve sustained stimulation of WBC production, rhG-CSF must be administered frequently, thus limiting its clinical use.

METHODS

We conjugated rhG-CSF with linear monomethoxy-polyethylene glycol (PEG) maleimide at amino acid residue Cys(17) to test our hypothesis that this could extend the in vivo half-life of rhG-CSF in blood.

RESULTS

The mono-PEG rhG-CSF became more stable to pH, temperature, and enzyme degradation in vitro, and had granulopoietic activity that was superior to the unmodified form in vivo. The granulopoietic activity of PEG-G-CSF was 2.82-fold greater than that of unmodified G-CSF.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the thiol-specific PEGylation remarkably prolonged the half-life of rhG-CSF and represents a novel strategy to address the more clinically acceptable therapeutic application of hemopoietic growth factor.

Antiapoptotic cytokines in combination with pegfilgrastim soon after irradiation mitigates myelosuppression in nonhuman primates exposed to high irradiation dose

OBJECTIVE

Preservation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from early radiation-induced apoptosis is the rationale for emergency antiapoptotic cytokine therapy (EACK) after radiation accidents. This strategy is based on the combination of stem cell factor + Flt3-ligand + thrombopoietin + interleukin 3 (SFT3). The long-term safety and efficacy of EACK in managing severe radiation exposure were evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Early administration of SFT3 + pegfilgrastim was assessed in 7-Gy gamma total body-irradiated (TBI) monkeys. Efficiency of delayed administration was also addressed after 5-Gy TBI.

RESULTS

Here we showed that a single, intravenous injection of SFT3 2 hours after 7-Gy TBI reduced the period of thrombocytopenia (platelet count <20 x 10(9)/L: 0.8 +/- 1.5 day vs 23.8 +/- 15.9 days in controls; p < 0.05) and blood transfusion needs. Moreover, addition of pegfilgrastim to SFT3 treatment shortened the period of neutropenia compared with SFT3 and control groups (neutrophil count <0.5 x 10(9)/L: 7 +/- 1.4 days vs 13 +/- 3.2 days and 15.2 +/- 1.5 days; p < 0.05). In both SFT3 groups, bone marrow activity recovered earlier and, in contrast with controls, platelet count returned to baseline values from 250 days after irradiation. Furthermore, delayed (48 hours) single SFT3 administration in 5-Gy irradiated monkeys significantly reduced thrombocytopenia compared to controls. Finally, SFT3 did not increase frequency of total chromosome translocations observed in the blood lymphocytes of controls 1 year after 5 Gy TBI.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest the safety and efficacy of EACK in managing severe radiation exposure.

Efficient mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following CAD chemotherapy and a single dose of pegylated G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation is the standard treatment for myeloma patients. In this study, CAD (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, dexamethasone) chemotherapy and a single dose of pegfilgrastim (12 mg) was highly effective in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for subsequent transplantation, with 88% of patients (n = 26) achieving the CD34+ cell harvest target of > or = 7.50 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight, following a median of two apheresis procedures (range 1-4) and with first apheresis performed at a median day 13 after CAD application (range 10-20). Patients treated with pegfilgrastim showed a reduced time to first apheresis procedure from mobilization compared with filgrastim-mobilized historical matched controls (n = 52, P = 0.015). The pegfilgrastim mobilization regimen allowed for transplantation of a median of 3.58 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight while leaving sufficient stored cells for a second high-dose regimen and back-ups in most patients. Engraftment following transplantation was comparable to filgrastim, with a median time of 14 days to leucocyte > or =1.0 x 10(9)/l (range 10-21) and 11 days to platelets > or = 20 x 10(9)/l (range 0-15). The results of this study thus provide further support for the clinical utility of pegfilgrastim for the mobilization of PBSC following chemotherapy in cancer patients scheduled for transplantation.

Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy

The myelotoxicity of most chemotherapeutic regimens used to treat children and adolescents with cancer require the use of daily subcutaneous administration of hematological growth factors (mainly granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). Recently, pegfilgrastim (Neulasta), a product with a long half-life, resulting in once-per-cycle dosage, was introduced to prevent neutropenia in adults, and provided safety and efficacy similar to that provided by daily injection of filgrastim. To evaluate retrospectively the use of pegfilgrastim in children with cancer, we conducted a single-center retrospective study evaluating the use of pegfilgrastim in patients over 40 kg, who received chemotherapy for cancer from September 2003 to December 2005. A single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg (maximum dose 6 mg) per chemotherapy cycle in children receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy was given. One hundred and twenty-six administrations of pegfilgrastim were analyzed in 28 pediatric patients treated for cancer (11 girls, 17 boys) with a median age of 14.5 years (range 12-18 years) and median weight of 50.5 kg (range 40-82 kg). Patients received a median dose of pegfilgrastim of 100 microg/kg (range 73-117). The median total number of injections per patient was 4 (range 1-14). The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia by cycle was 48%, the mean duration of neutropenia was 3 days (range 1-13 days). The median values of absolute neutrophil count nadir was 0.425 x 10(9)/l (range 0-9.9 x 10(9)). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 18 of the 126 patients on pegfilgrastim use (14%) with full recovery in all patients. The median total duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy was 5 days (range 2-14 days). Bone pain (four) and headaches (two) were the most frequent adverse events reported. No correlation was found between the administered dose of Neulasta and hematological data. In conclusion, the use of pegfilgrastim was safe and well tolerated in children with cancer treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim must be compared with filgrastim and evaluated in younger children with lower body weight.

Pegfilgrastim as hematopoietic support for dose-dense chemoimmunotherapy with R-CHOP-14 as first-line therapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma

GOALS OF WORK

Recently, 6 cycles of R-CHOP-14 have been recommended as the reference standard regimen for the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Pegfilgrastim has been shown to facilitate dose-dense chemotherapy schedules with a single administration per chemotherapy cycle. The aims of this study were to evaluate the use of pegfilgrastim in combination with the R-CHOP-14 regimen in a homogenous group of previously untreated elderly patients with DLBCL and to assess the pharmacokinetics of pegfilgrastim within this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients with DLBCL between 60 and 80 years of age received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim 24 h after administration of R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy, which was repeated for 6 to 8 cycles in two-weekly intervals. A total of 348 blood samples were collected. Pegfilgrastim plasma levels and absolute neutrophil counts were measured every other day during the first treatment cycle and twice weekly during all consecutive cycles.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-three of 72 cycles (87.5%) could be delivered on time and at the planned dose. Median absolute neutrophil nadir was 0.32 g/l on day 9. Grade 3/4 granulocytopenia occurred in all patients. Febrile neutropenia occurred in two patients. Plasma levels of pegfilgrastim remained elevated during the neutropenic phase. At the start of hematologic recovery, plasma concentrations of pegfilgrastim decreased rapidly to baseline levels. Median pegfilgrastim trough plasma level was 0.43 ng/ml on the day preceding the next application.

CONCLUSIONS

A single fixed dose of 6 mg of pegfilgrastim given once per cycle of R-CHOP-14 is effective in supporting neutrophil recovery to allow two-weekly drug administration in previously untreated elderly patients with DLBCL. However, close monitoring for infectious complications is mandatory in this patient population.

Development and implementation of a risk assessment tool for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a tool developed and implemented to help practitioners assess the risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its complications in patients with nonleukemia cancer types.

DESIGN

Retrospective survey of chart records.

SETTING

Community-based oncology practice.

SAMPLE

The medical records of 85 adult patients treated with new courses of chemotherapy, regardless of the cancer type or stage; 50 charts belonged to patients treated before the implementation of the tool and 35 to patients evaluated with the tool.

METHODS

A risk assessment tool for CIN that was developed using risk factors from published studies and national guidelines was implemented. Patients who were found to be at increased risk for CIN were given colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support starting with the first chemotherapy cycle. The effectiveness of the tool was evaluated by comparing clinical outcomes before and after the implementation of the risk assessment tool.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Febrile neutropenia, IV antibiotic use, hospitalization for neutropenia, and chemotherapy dose reductions and delays.

FINDINGS

Chemotherapy dose delays, febrile neutropenia, treatment with IV antibiotics, and hospitalization for neutropenia occurred less frequently in patients assessed with the tool and managed with the algorithm for CSF use than in those who were not assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

The Risk Assessment for Neutropenic Complications Tool is effective in helping practitioners determine which patients are at high risk for CIN and its complications

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

By using the tool to identify patients treated with chemotherapy who need growth factor support, nurses can help to reduce the incidence of neutropenia and its complications.

Sustained G-CSF plasma levels following administration of pegfilgrastim fasten neutrophil reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

Pegfilgrastim has shown to decrease the duration of severe neutropenia after conventional chemotherapy, but its use after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation has not been established yet. Therefore we studied the efficacy and the pharmacokinetic profile of pegfilgrastim in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy.

METHOD

In total, 21 patients received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day +1 after transplantation and pegfilgrastim plasma levels were measured daily by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clinical outcome was compared with pegfilgrastim levels of 282 plasma samples and data of a historical control group of patients without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support.

RESULTS

Pegfilgrastim levels showed an inverse correlation (r = -0.68, p < 0.01) with neutrophil counts. Peak levels were reached at day +4 (94 ng/mL; range: 37-205) and were maintained until day +7 (85 ng/mL; range: 35-186). Comparison with the control group without G-CSF support showed that time to neutrophil reconstitution was significantly shorter in the pegfilgrastim group with 10 vs 15 days, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no correlation of pegfilgrastim levels and the duration of neutropenia, although patients with a fivefold increase in neutrophil counts the day after pegfilgrastim administration had a significantly shorter median duration of neutropenia in comparison to patients who were less susceptible to G-CSF stimulation (5 vs 7 days, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Neutrophil reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy could be accelerated by the use of pegfilgrastim in patients with myeloma. Responsiveness of neutrophils to pegfilgrastim before neutropenia was correlated with faster neutrophil reconstitution, whereas G-CSF levels had no impact on neutrophil recovery.

Febrile neutropenia: highlighting the role of prophylactic antibiotics and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during standard dose chemotherapy for solid tumors

The prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia is important as it reduces hospitalization and is likely to improve quality of life. Several prophylactic strategies are available, although their use in patients with an anticipated short duration of neutropenia is controversial and not recommended. This paper presents the results of a review of the literature on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and also discusses the recommendations in current guidelines in view of recent publications. Both primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and prophylactic antibiotics reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia considerably, and the addition of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to antibiotics is even more effective. As antibiotics, however, give rise to antimicrobial resistance and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is expensive, tailoring of prophylaxis is clearly needed. This will increase the absolute clinical and economical benefits of prophylaxis. Patient-related, treatment-related and disease-related factors enhancing the risk of febrile neutropenia are discussed, including the, underrated, high risk of febrile neutropenia specifically in the first cycles of chemotherapy. Half of the patients developing febrile neutropenia during treatment do so in the first cycle of chemotherapy, which favors primary prophylaxis. The efficacy of secondary prophylaxis is not well documented. Finally, new interesting agents in the treatment and supportive care of solid tumors have become available, and these are discussed in relation to the incidence and prevention of febrile neutropenia.

Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor to Primary Prophylaxis With Antibiotics in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

Recently, a Dutch, randomized, phase III trial demonstrated that, in small-cell lung cancer patients at risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN), the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) to prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced the incidence of FN in cycle 1 (24% v 10%; P = .01). We hypothesized that selecting patients at risk of FN might increase the cost-effectiveness of GCSF prophylaxis.

Methods

Economic analysis was conducted alongside the clinical trial and was focused on the health care perspective. Primary outcome was the difference in mean total costs per patient in cycle 1 between both prophylactic strategies. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as costs per percent-FN-prevented.

Results

For the first cycle, the mean incremental costs of adding GCSF amounted to 681 euro (95% CI, −36 to 1,397 euro) per patient. For the entire treatment period, the mean incremental costs were substantial (5,123 euro; 95% CI, 3,908 to 6,337 euro), despite a significant reduction in the incidence of FN and related savings in medical care consumption. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 50 euro per percent decrease of the probability of FN (95% CI, −2 to 433 euro) in cycle 1, and the acceptability for this willingness to pay was approximately 50%.

Conclusion

Despite the selection of patients at risk of FN, the addition of GCSF to primary antibiotic prophylaxis did not result in cost savings. If policy makers are willing to pay 240 euro for each percent gain in effect (ie, 3,360 euro for a 14% reduction in FN), the addition of GCSF can be considered cost effective.

Dose-dense chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease that represents the seventh leading cause of cancer death. Second-generation and third-generation chemotherapy regimens have only produced a marginal improvement in outcome over the administration of the cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone regimen in aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This has led to the development of different strategies for improving disease-free and overall survival in this disease. Dose intensification achieved by condensing the intervals between each chemotherapy cycle is possible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, which reduces neutropenia and its complications. Clinical trials indicate that this strategy may improve the outcomes in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly elderly patients. Nurses can play a major role in the implementation of evidence-based supportive care strategies in clinical practice to ensure safe use of dose-dense chemotherapy regimens.

Pegfilgrastim compared with Filgrastim after autologous hematopoietic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

In order to assess the effect of Pegfilgrastim on the duration of neutropenia and clinical outcome of patients after autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation, we compared 20 consecutive patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma receiving a single 6-mg dose of Pegfilgrastim on day 1 posttransplant to an historical control group of 60 patients receiving daily Filgrastim 5 microg/kg starting on day 1 posttransplant. The duration of neutropenia was similar in the Pegfilgrastim group compared with the control group. There were no differences in time to neutrophil, erythroid, or platelet engraftment nor in the incidence of fever and infections. The duration of antibiotic therapy, transfusion support, and time to hospital discharge were similar in the two groups. However, after initial hematopoietic reconstitution, we observed significantly higher values of lymphocytes (e.g., 1,660+/-1,000 versus 970+/-460 on day 80, p=0.0002), neutrophils (e.g., 3,880+/-2,030 versus 2,420+/-1,500 on day 25, p=0.0004), reticulocytes (e.g., 148,160+/-90,590 versus 87,140+/-65,920 on day 25, p<0.0001), and platelets (e.g., 210,700+/-116,090 versus 150,240+/-58,230 on day 55, p=0.0052) up to day 100 in the Pegfilgrastim group compared with the Filgrastim group. These observations had no impact on clinical outcome of the patients after day 30 due to the low incidence of infectious events after engraftment in autologous PBSC transplantation. We conclude that the effect of Pegfilgrastim administrated on day 1 posttransplant is comparable to that of daily Filgrastim on initial hematopoietic reconstitution. The possibly superior effect of Pegfilgrastim on cell counts we observed after initial engraftment should be further tested in a prospective randomized trial.

Use of Filgrastim among Febrile Inpatients who Received Outpatient Filgrastim or Pegfilgrastim

Purpose

To characterize the inpatient use of filgrastim in cancer patients hospitalized for management of post-chemotherapy fever after receiving either outpatient filgrastim or pegfilgrastim.

Method

Retrospective review of chart records in a single-center, tertiary-care, teaching hospital and outpatient oncology center of cancer patients hospitalized for fever after outpatient chemotherapy and proactive administration of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim. Patients with the following tumor types were included: breast cancer, cervical cancer, colon cancer, Hodgkin disease, intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, small cell or non-small cell lung cancer, and ovarian cancer.

Result

Billing data identified 1,438 outpatient chemotherapy patients treated with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim; 261 (18.2%) of whom were hospitalized for fever. All patients in the filgrastim groups, and 78% of those in the pegfilgrastim group, were given inpatient filgrastim. Duration of filgrastim administration in the inpatient setting was significantly shorter ( P < 0.001) for the pegfilgrastim group.

Conclusions

Filgrastim was frequently administered to cancer patients hospitalized for fever, even after outpatient pegfilgrastim was administered as an adjunct to chemotherapy. Patients treated with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim in an outpatient setting do not require filgrastim if they are hospitalized for fever before neutrophil recovery. Thus, hospitals could realize immediate cost savings by not treating those patients with filgrastim. This study illustrates the need to develop operational procedures in institutions to rapidly identify prior outpatient pegfilgrastim administration as a patient is admitted for post-chemotherapy fever.

Phase I trial of infusional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE

To determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of a 96-h continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) of cyclophosphamide (200, 300, or 400 mg/m2/d) and etoposide (60 or 90 mg/m2/d) when used in conjunction with doxorubicin (12.5 mg/m2/d) (CDE) given every 28 d plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with poor prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Group A), and the same regimen given every 21 d (Group B).

METHODS

In Group A, infusional CDE was repeated every 28 d, GM-CSF (250 microg/m2) was given subcutaneously from d 6 until neutrophil recovery, with dose escalation in cohorts of three to six evaluable patients. The RPTD of cyclophosphamide and etoposide established in Group A was then used with CDE given every 3 wk (Group B) with GM-CSF given on d 6-20, and dose escalation was attempted again.

RESULTS

In Group A, the RPTD of cyclophosphamide and etoposide were 300 mg/m2/d and 90 mg/m2/d, respectively; prolonged neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. In Group B, use of GM-CSF on d 6-20 did not facilitate dose escalation above the RPTD established in Group A. Complete response occurred in 13/26 patients (50%) with no prior chemotherapy, and in 4/16 patients (25%) who had relapsed after prior chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the increase in dose and dose-density afforded by the administration of GM-CSF, the relative dose intensity was increased by twofold for cyclophosphamide (400 vs 200 mg/m2/wk) and etoposide (120 vs 60 mg/m2/wk), and by 1.3-fold for doxorubicin (16.7 vs 12.5 mg/m2/wk).

Risk models for predicting chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

Neutropenia and its complications, including febrile neutropenia, are major dose-limiting toxicities of systemic cancer chemotherapy. A number of studies have attempted to identify risk factors for neutropenia and its consequences to develop predictive models capable of identifying patients at greater risk for such complications and to guide more effective and cost-effective applications of the colony-stimulating factors. A systematic review of the literature showed that age, performance status, nutritional status, chemotherapy dose intensity, and low baseline blood cell counts were associated with the risk of severe and febrile neutropenia or reduced chemotherapy dose intensity in multivariate analysis in two or more studies. Similarly, age, diagnosis of leukemia or lymphoma, high temperature or low blood pressure at admission, and i.v. site infection along with low blood cell counts and organ dysfunction were associated with serious medical complications of febrile neutropenia, including bacteremia and death. The available risk model studies, however, had several limitations, including retrospective analyses of small study populations lacking independent validation, frequent missing values, and differences in the predictive factors considered. To overcome the limitations of previous studies, efforts are under way to develop and validate risk models based on large prospective studies in representative populations of patients receiving systemic chemotherapy.

Cytokine-based treatment of accidentally irradiated victims and new approaches

A major goal of medical management of acute radiation syndrome following accidental exposures to ionizing radiation (IR) is to mitigate the risks of infection and hemorrhage related to the period of bone marrow aplasia. This can be achieved by stimulating the proliferation and differentiation of residual hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) related to either their intrinsic radioresistance or the heterogeneity of dose distribution. This is the rationale for treatment with hematopoietic growth factors. In fact, apoptosis has recently been shown to play a major role in the death of the continuum of more or less radiosensitive HSPC, soon after irradiation. Therefore, administration of antiapoptotic cytokine combinations such as stem cell factor, Flt-3 ligand, thrombopoietin, and interleukin-3 (4F), may be important for multilineage recovery, particularly when these factors are administered early. Moreover, acute exposure to high doses of IR induces sequential, deleterious effects responsible for a delayed multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. These considerations strongly suggest that therapeutics could include tissue-specific cytokines, such as keratinocyte growth factor, and pleiotropic agents, such as erythropoietin, in addition to hematopoietic growth factors to ensure tissue damage repair and mitigate the inflammatory processes. Noncytokine drugs have also been proposed as an alternative to treat hematopoietic or nonhematopoietic radiation effects. To develop more effective treatments for radiation injuries, basic research is required, particularly to improve understanding of stem cell needs within their environment. In the context of radiological terrorism and radiation accidents, new growth promoting molecules need to be approved and available cytokines stockpiled.

Pegfilgrastim in pediatric cancer patients

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a major dose-limiting side effect of intensive chemotherapy in cancer patients. Recently, pegfilgrastim (a product with a long half-life, resulting in once-per-cycle dosage) was introduced to prevent neutropenia in adults. The authors report 32 episodes of pegfilgrastim use in seven pediatric cancer patients to diminish chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Feasibility was assessed by adherence to treatment protocol and safety was assessed by adverse effects. There were only two treatment delays (6%) due to neutropenia. No short-term adverse effects were recorded. The use of pegfilgrastim is feasible in pediatric cancer patients, without short-term adverse effects or major treatment delay due to neutropenia.

Pegfilgrastim -- rational drug design for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

Neutropenia is the most important dose-limiting toxicity of myelotoxic chemotherapy. Current guidelines recommend primary prophylactic use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with chemotherapy regimens associated with an incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) of at least 40% and in patients at high risk of infections, such as the elderly. Using prophylactic G-CSF support, planned chemotherapy doses are administered on time more frequently. Pegfilgrastim is a rationally designed recombinant human G-CSF with a sustained duration of action. A once-per-cycle 6-mg fixed dose of pegfilgrastim reduced the duration of severe neutropenia and the incidence of FN as efficiently as daily filgrastim in standard or dose-dense chemotherapy regimens in young and elderly patients with breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer and lymphomas. The safety profile of onceper- cycle pegfilgrastim is comparable with that of daily filgrastim. In conclusion, a fixed-dose of pegfilgrastim given once per cycle is a suitable substitute for body weight-based daily dosing of G-CSF, an improvement which should be particularly beneficial for outpatients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

Impact of five prophylactic filgrastim schedules on hematologic toxicity in early breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide

PURPOSE

To evaluate the comparative efficacy of varying intensity schedules of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) support in preventing febrile neutropenia in early breast cancer patients treated with relatively high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 1991 to April 1994, 506 stage I and II breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive, in a factorial 2 x 2 design, epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles +/- lonidamine +/- G-CSF. The following five consecutive G-CSF schedules were tested every 100 randomly assigned patients: (1) 480 microg/d subcutaneously days 8 to 14; (2) 480 microg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; (3) 300 microg/d days 8 to 14; (4) 300 microg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; and (5) 300 microg/d days 8 and 12.

RESULTS

All of the G-CSF schedules covered the neutrophil nadir time. Schedule 5 was equivalent to the daily schedules (schedules 1 and 3) and to the alternate day schedules (schedules 2 and 4) with respect to incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (P = .79 and P = .89, respectively), rate of fever episodes (P = .84 and P = .77, respectively), incidence of neutropenic fever (P = .74 and P = .56, respectively), need of antibiotics (P = .77 and P = .88, respectively), and percentage of delayed cycles (P = .43 and P = .42, respectively). G-CSF had no significant impact on the delivered dose-intensity compared with the non-G-CSF arms.

CONCLUSION

In the adjuvant setting, the frequency of prophylactic G-CSF administration during EC could be curtailed to only two administrations (days 8 and 12) without altering outcome. This nonrandomized trial design provides support for evaluating alternative, less intense G-CSF schedules for women with early breast cancer.

Optimal use of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in patients with cancer who are at risk for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the risks for and occurrence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer and its optimal prophylactic management with recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).

DATA SOURCES

Original research, review articles, conference presentations, and published guidelines.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a common serious adverse event, and the risks for it can be predicted on the basis of patient characteristics and the chemotherapy regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal, cost-effective prophylactic management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia with G-CSF requires the assessment of patient factors and the myelotoxicity of the chemotherapy regimen.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Neutropenia and its complications can be serious adverse events in patients who are treated with chemotherapy. Nurses should be familiar with how to identify patients who are at risk for neutropenia and its complications and should be prepared to discuss the need for first-cycle use of G-CSF with the other members of the treatment team as necessary.

Current and future use of hematopoietic growth factors in cancer medicine

Myelosuppression, in particular neutropenia and anemia are serious complications of malignancy and its treatment. Neutropenia can make patients vulnerable to potentially life-threatening infection. It often results in dose reductions and delay of planned chemotherapy, which can have a significant detrimental effect on tumour response and survival. Anemia can be associated with a range of debilitating effects, which can severely impair patients' QOL. In addition, there is some evidence recognizing anemia as a poor prognostic indicator, associated with reduced treatment efficacy. Reduction in the duration and severity of neutropenia and anemia is possible by initiation of appropriate growth factors during the first and subsequent cycles of chemotherapy. New and improved growth factor support with agents such as pegfilgrastim and darbepoetin alfa has the potential to improve the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and anemia further. Thrombopoietin is currently in clinical trials to assess its potential role in the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with cancer.

Once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in pediatric patients with Ewing sarcoma

The use of the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor filgrastim to shorten the duration of severe neutropenia after cytotoxic chemotherapy has become an integral part of supportive care. However, due to its short serum half-life, filgrastim must be injected daily. Pegfilgrastim, a new long-lasting form of filgrastim administrated once per cycle, has been shown in adults to be as effective in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia as daily filgrastim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of pegfilgrastim in pediatric patients. Five children with Ewing sarcoma were alternately treated with a single 100 microg/kg pegfilgrastim dose or daily doses of 10 microg/kg Filgrastim after a total number of 58 chemotherapy cycles. Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated. The duration of severe neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia after pegfilgrastim and filgrastim were comparable. By using pegfilgrastim, the number of subcutaneous injections could be reduced to one single injection per cycle.

Colony-stimulating factors in the management of neutropenia and its complications

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage CSF are potent drugs used to increase neutrophil counts after myelosuppressive chemotherapy. However, in various indications, the use of CSFs has no clinical benefit with regard to morbidity or mortality from infectious complications, frequency of antibiotic use, or rate of hospitalization. Thus, the application of CSFs should be limited to indications with proven clinical benefits or evidence of cost-effectiveness. This review will provide an overview of the state-of-the-art use of CSFs in chemotherapy-associated neutropenia, transplantation, and bone marrow failure syndromes. In addition, recently developed drugs for accelerated hematopoietic recovery will be presented.

Protocols for managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in clinical oncology practices

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is managed in different ways in clinical practice. Chemotherapy dose reductions and delays are used more often than proactive, first-cycle use of colony-stimulating factors, but such dose modifications can result in suboptimal treatment outcomes. This article reviews how 3 oncology practices have used practice pattern studies to assess and improve their quality of care, particularly in the management of neutropenia. These practices analyzed their records for the occurrence of neutropenia and for delays or reductions in chemotherapy doses. Once baseline measurements of quality of care were established, the practices developed guidelines to optimize their management of neutropenia. The practice patterns were assessed again after the guidelines had been implemented, to determine the effect of these guidelines on clinical outcomes. All 3 practices had fewer delays and reductions of chemotherapy doses after the guidelines were used. These differences were both clinically and statistically significant. Clinical experience shows that nurses are well positioned to assess which patients may be at the greatest risk for neutropenia and its complications and therefore should be treated with colony-stimulating factors. Practice guidelines for the use of colony-stimulating factors are being developed, but broader acceptance of these guidelines is needed to support nurses' recommendations.

Pegfilgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant: phase II study

Pegfilgrastim is equivalent to daily filgrastim after standard dose chemotherapy in decreasing the duration of neutropenia. Daily filgrastim started within 1-4 days after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) leads to significant decrease in time to neutrophil engraftment. We undertook a study of pegfilgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and ASCT. In all, 38 patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma, eligible to undergo HDC and ASCT, were enrolled. Patients received a single dose of 6 mg pegfilgrastim subcutaneously 24 h after ASCT. There were no adverse events secondary to pegfilgrastim. All patients engrafted neutrophils and platelets with a median of 10 and 18 days, respectively. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 49% (18/37). Neutrophil engraftment results were compared to a historical cohort of patients who received no growth factors or prophylactic filgrastim after ASCT. Time to neutrophil engraftment using pegfilgrastim was comparable to daily filgrastim and was shorter than in a historical group receiving no filgrastim (10 vs 13.7 days, P<0.001). Pegfilgrastim given as a single fixed dose of 6 mg appears to be safe after HDC and ASCT. It accelerates neutrophil engraftment comparable to daily filgrastim after ASCT. Pegfilgrastim may be convenient to use in outpatient transplant units.

Quality of Life and Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia

This report summarizes recent data on neutropenia-related quality of life (QOL), including measures and interventions. Neutropenia is a common adverse effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy. The clinical significance of QOL in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) remains largely unexplored, although recent studies have shown a correlation between severe CIN and impaired QOL. Neutropenia typically occurs at the same time as other adverse effects. Data indicate that other toxicities are worse in the presence of febrile neutropenia and that these concurrent events may have a greater effect on QOL. Precautions that are taken to minimize the incidence of infection in patients with neutropenia may also affect their QOL. Future research should focus on accurately defining and measuring QOL in patients with CIN as well as on assessing ways to manage CIN more effectively and thus improve QOL. A number of interventions may have a positive influence on QOL in patients with cancer and neutropenia. Hematopoietic growth factor support, for example, reduces the incidence and sequelae of neutropenia and may provide a QOL benefit. To assess the effect of such interventions, neutropenia-specific QOL instruments, such as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neutropenia (FACT-N), may be valuable tools.

Fixed-dose single administration of Pegfilgrastim vs daily Filgrastim in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Infectious complications are frequent events in patients undergoing high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy with subsequent autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). To evaluate whether a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (6 mg) is as safe and effective as daily filgrastim (5 mug/kg/day), 60 consecutive autologous stem cell transplantations performed for various haematological malignancies have been analysed. In total, 24 patients undergoing 30 consecutive PBSCT received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 5 after transplantation and were compared retrospectively with 30 patients receiving 5 mug/kg/day of filgrastim starting from day 7 post transplantation. The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups was 8.3 and 9.5 days, respectively (P=0.047). The results of the two groups were not significantly different for incidence of febrile neutropenia and toxicity profile. However, duration of febrile neutropenia (1.6 vs 3.0 days) and total days of fever (1.73 vs 4.1) were different (P=0.017 and 0.003, respectively), favouring the pegfilgrastim arm. Consequently, a higher incidence of transplants with documented infectious complications associated with the filgrastim group could be observed (56 vs 26%) (P=0.02). A single injection of pegfilgrastim administered at day 5 post transplant shows comparable safety and efficacy profiles to daily injections of filgrastim.

First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy of pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia associated with docetaxel in breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to either placebo or pegfilgrastim 6 mg subcutaneously on day 2 of each 21-day chemotherapy cycle of 100 mg/m(2) docetaxel. The primary end point was the percentage of patients developing febrile neutropenia (defined as body temperature >/= 38.2 degrees C and neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/L on the same day of the fever or the day after). Secondary end points were incidence of hospitalizations associated with a diagnosis of febrile neutropenia, intravenous (IV) anti-infectives required for febrile neutropenia, and the ability to maintain planned chemotherapy dose on time. Patients with febrile neutropenia were converted to open-label pegfilgrastim in subsequent cycles.

RESULTS

Nine hundred twenty-eight patients received placebo (n = 465) or pegfilgrastim (n = 463). Patients receiving pegfilgrastim, compared with patients receiving placebo, had a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia (1% v 17%, respectively; P < .001), febrile neutropenia-related hospitalization (1% v 14%, respectively; P < .001), and use of IV anti-infectives (2% v 10%, respectively; P < .001). The percentage of patients receiving the planned dose on time was similar between patients receiving pegfilgrastim and patients who initially received placebo (80% and 78%, respectively), as would be expected of the study design. Pegfilgrastim was generally well tolerated and safe, and the adverse events reported were typical of this patient population.

CONCLUSION

First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim with a moderately myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen markedly reduced febrile neutropenia, febrile neutropenia-related hospitalizations, and IV anti-infective use.

Granulocyte colony--stimulating factor for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with small cell lung cancer : the 40% rule revisited

Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) [filgrastim and lenograstim] and pegylated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) have been shown to reduce the severity and duration of chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia (FN) when administered prophylactically to cancer patients receiving chemotherapeutic regimens. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) evidence-based clinical guidelines published in 1994, 1996 and 1997 recommended primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for cancer patients. The 2000 ASCO update, with the same recommendation, highlights the importance of economic considerations in decision making for CSFs. This paper reviews the available cost-effectiveness evidence on the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis against FN in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).Cost-effectiveness ratios from a healthcare payer perspective supported the use of filgrastim as primary prophylaxis for people with SCLC, on the basis of both clinical and economic benefits, treated with chemotherapeutic regimens that have an FN rate in the range of 40-60%. However, when indirect and patient out-of-pocket costs attributable to severe FN are included, available evidence suggests that the risk threshold may be reduced by more than half. Given that FN rates associated with chemotherapeutic regimens for SCLC are generally <40%, then few circumstances would warrant the use of G-CSFs (filgrastim and lenograstim) under the current rule. However, inclusion of indirect costs would lower the cost-effectiveness threshold. Future cost-effectiveness studies of medications such as pegfilgrastim should attempt to capture the societal perspective by incorporating productivity-related costs and using base-case rates of FN reported in the literature.

Managing hematologic toxicities: novel therapies

Myelosuppression associated with cancer chemotherapy may lead to neutropenia, anemia, or both, resulting in an increased risk for infection, fatigue, diminished quality of life, and reduced survival. In addition, neutropenia specifically has been shown to result in dose reductions, treatment delays, or both in subsequent chemotherapy cycles. Hematopoietic growth factors have been used effectively as supportive therapy to reduce chemotherapy-associated neutropenia and anemia. New preparations have the potential to improve treatment outcome dramatically. Results from recently reported studies indicate that patients at risk for neutropenia can be safely and effectively treated with pegfilgrastim once per chemotherapy cycle, and that those with anemia can be managed with weekly or biweekly darbepoetin alfa therapy. These new treatments have the potential to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with opportunistic infections, decrease the requirement for potentially dangerous blood transfusions, and improve the quality of life for patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. The longer dosing intervals offered by these new preparations may decrease healthcare expenses and enhance patient adherence.