Three-arm randomized study of two cisplatin-based regimens and paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group--EORTC 08975

Phase II study of the combination of gemcitabine and nedaplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We examined the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and nedaplatin in patients with untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Thirty-four patients (24 men and 10 women) with a mean age of 69 years (range, 39-75 years) were treated every 3 weeks with gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) and nedaplatin (100 mg/m(2) on day 1). Four patients had stage IIIB disease and 30 patients had stage IV disease. None of the 33 patients achieved a complete response, but 10 achieved a partial response, for a response rate of 30.3% (95% confidence interval, 15.6-48.7%). One patient could not be evaluated for response because only one course of chemotherapy had been administered due to grade 3 eruption. The median survival time was 9.0 months (range, 1-17 months). Grades 3-4 hematological toxicities included leukopenia in 47% of patients, neutropenia in 62%, thrombocytopenia in 56%, and anemia in 44%. Grades 3-4 nonhematological toxicities included nausea and vomiting in 6% of patients, diarrhea in 3%, and hepatic dysfunction in 9%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The dose intensities were 89.6% and 86.7%, respectively, of the planned doses of gemcitabine and nedaplatin. Our results suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and nedaplatin is an acceptable treatment for patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Phase II trial of a 2-h infusion of gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of using gemcitabine as a rate infusion of 10 mg/m(2) per min with carboplatin in front-line chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC have been included, 44 males and 10 females, with a median age 63 years (range 19-75). Thirty-two (59%) patients had adenocarcinoma, 13 (24%) squamous cell, 1 (2%) large cell carcinoma and 8 (15%) others. Eight (15%) had stage IIIB and 46 (85%) stage IV. Treatment was consisted of 1,200 mg/m(2) gemcitabine given as a 2-h continuous infusion (10 mg/m(2) per min) on days 1 and 8 of each cycle an AUC 5 carboplatin as on day 1, repeating each cycle for every 21 days. A total of 223 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of four cycles per patient (range 1-6), and 15 (28%) patients received all six cycles.

RESULTS

Of the 54 patients enrolled, all were evaluated for toxicity and 51 assessed for response. The overall response rate was 41% (95% confidence interval, 28-57%) with complete and partial responses of 4 and 37%, respectively. The median time to disease progression was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.3 months), and median overall survival time was 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.1 months). One-year survival was 42%. The main grade 3-4 toxicity (according to the WHO scale) consisted of neutropenia (56%) and thrombocytopenia (57%). Patients were required platelet transfusion in 27 cycles (12%) and hematopoietic growth factors support care in 56 (25%) cycles. No bleeding episodes were recorded. Grade 3 nausea/vomiting occurred in 6% and grade 1-2 skin rash occurred in 43%.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged gemcitabine infusion combined with carboplatin is manageable and tolerated, and its efficacy is similar to that of other chemotherapeutic schemes used for NSCLC treatment.

First-line chemotherapy for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: focus on docetaxel

Systemic chemotherapy results in modest improvements in survival and quality of life for patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Administration of a platinum compound in combination with a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel), gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or irinotecan is considered optimal first-line therapy for patients with advanced-stage NSCLC who have a good performance status. Studies that have compared various platinum agent-based doublet regimens have demonstrated comparable efficacy between these regimens. In addition, non-platinum agent-based regimens have also demonstrated response rates and survival similar to the platinum agent-based combinations. These developments have allowed for tailoring of chemotherapy to individual patients based on factors such as toxicity profile, treatment schedule, and cost. Docetaxel is approved for first-line therapy and salvage treatment of advanced-stage NSCLC. Multiple randomized clinical trials have established the efficacy of platinum-agent/docetaxel regimens for first-line treatment of advanced-stage NSCLC. Improvements in various lung cancer-related symptoms and global quality of life indices have been noted with docetaxel-based regimens. Combination chemotherapy appears to be beneficial even for elderly patients. The current generation of clinical trials is evaluating the incorporation of molecularly targeted agents into existing 2-drug chemotherapy regimens. This article will discuss the role of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.

Pharmacology of the paclitaxel-cisplatin, gemcitabine-cisplatin, and paclitaxel-gemcitabine combinations in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the pharmacology of the paclitaxel-cisplatin, gemcitabine-cisplatin and paclitaxel-gemcitabine combinations in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four chemo-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive one of the three regimens. Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacologic parameters in mononuclear cells were compared and related to toxicity and efficacy.

RESULTS

Pharmacological parameters of gemcitabine and cisplatin were not influenced by the combination with one of the other agents, while the paclitaxel clearance was significantly lower for the combination with cisplatin as compared to gemcitabine (P=0.024). The percentage decrease in platelets was significantly higher for the gemcitabine combinations (P=0.004) and related to the dFdCTP-Cmax (P=0.030). Pharmacologic parameters were not related to response or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and cisplatin pharmacology were not influenced by the combination with one of the other agents, while paclitaxel has a lower clearance in combination with cisplatin as compared to gemcitabine.

Should chemotherapy combinations for advanced non-small cell lung cancer be platinum-based? A meta-analysis of phase III randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Non-platinum regimens have been proposed as an alternative to the platinum-based combinations for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, conflicting results were reported.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of phase III trials randomizing platinum-based versus non-platinum combinations as first-line chemotherapy with 1-year survival rate as a primary endpoint. Fourteen trials have been identified. Experimental arms were gemcitabine/vinorelbine (n=4), gemcitabine/taxane (n=7), gemcitabine/epirubicin (n=1), paclitaxel/vinorelbine (n=1), and gemcitabine/ifosfamide (n=1). The comparator was a doublet of a platinum compound plus a third generation agent for all but two studies (triplets). Updated data were available for 13 studies. The Peto and Yusuf method was used to generate odds ratios (OR). All tests are two-sided.

RESULTS

A statistical heterogeneity was detected when the 13 studies were analyzed. Considering that current guidelines recommend platinum-based doublets as standard therapy we therefore limited the meta-analysis to the set of 11 phase III studies which used a platinum-based doublet (2298 and 2304 patients in platinum-based and non-platinum arms, respectively). No significant heterogeneity was detected in this consistent group of studies. Patients treated with a platinum-based regimen benefited from a statically significant reduction in the risk of death at 1 year (OR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99; p=0.044) and a lower risk of being refractory to chemotherapy (OR: 0.87, 0.73-0.99; p=0.049). Forty-four (1.9%) and 29 (1.3%) toxic-related deaths were reported for platinum-based and non-platinum regimens, respectively (OR: 1.53; 0.96-2.49, p=0.08). An increased risk of grade 3-4 gastro-intestinal and hematological toxicity for patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy was statistically demonstrated. There was no statically significant increase in risk of febrile neutropenia, OR=1.23 (0.94-1.60, p=0.063).

CONCLUSION

A platinum-based doublet induced a statically significant reduction in the risk of death when compared with non-platinum chemotherapy without inducing an unacceptable increase in toxicity.

Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Quality of life (QOL) has been shown to improve with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the determinants of this improvement have not been thoroughly explored. Fifty consecutive NSCLC patients starting chemotherapy with measurable disease and with an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of <or=2 were evaluated for change in QOL by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30). The status of global QOL before chemotherapy influenced the degree of change in physical functioning (F = 8.71, P =.001), global QOL (F = 23.82, P <.001), and fatigue (F = 7.92, P =.001), whereas age of the patient was again linked with the change in global QOL (F = 4.68, P =.014), and type of chemotherapy administration (1st vs. 2nd line) was associated with the change in fatigue (F = 7.82, P =.001). Our findings show that patient age and baseline QOL assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30, but not ECOG performance status, may help predict the amount of improvement in certain aspects of QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy. Conversely, in this cohort, patients who are likely to have deteriorating QOL on chemotherapy may benefit from closer follow-up and nursing care to optimize supportive measures.

Long-duration, weekly treatment with gemcitabine plus vinorelbine for non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter phase II study

In this phase II study, gemcitabine and vinorelbine were combined at suboptimal doses for weekly administration in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objectives were to determine objective response rate (ORR) and time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were safety and overall survival. Chemonaive patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) immediately followed by gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) once each week (on day 1) for 6 months without rest. From May 1998 to May 1999, 40 patients were enrolled (85% males; 70% stage IV) with a median age of 65.5. A total of 478 doses were administered, with a median of 9 per patient (range 2-72). The ORR was 27.5% (95% CI, 15.1-44.1%). The median TTP was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.9-4.4 months). At a median follow-up of 6.5 months, the median survival was 11.6 months, and survival rates at 1 and 2 year(s) were 47.5% and 15.8%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia, in 70% of patients, with febrile neutropenia in 28%. The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was transaminase elevation, in 22.5% of patients, which was transient and reversible. The other most prominent toxicities were, unexpectedly, pulmonary and cardiac toxicities. Based on these results, weekly, long-term administration of gemcitabine-vinorelbine appears to be an active regimen in NSCLC that warrants further investigation.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of novel taxane BMS-188797 and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

This phase I study investigated the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of a 3-weekly administration of BMS-188797, a paclitaxel derivate, at three dose levels (DLs) (80, 110 and 150 mg m⁻² DL), combined with cisplatin (standard dose 75 mg m⁻²). In 16 patients with advanced malignancies treated, one patient experienced dose-limiting febrile neutropenia, sepsis and severe colitis at the 150 mg m⁻² DL; at the 110 mg m⁻² DL one episode of dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhoea/nausea occurred. Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were leucopenia/neutropenia; grade 3 nonhaematological toxicities were neuropathy, nausea, diarrhoea and stomatits. Objective response was seen in four patients, with three complete remissions in ovarian and cervical cancer patients. Pharmacokinetics of BMS-188797 appeared linear through the 110 mg m⁻², but not through the 150 mg m⁻² DL. The mean±SD values for clearance, distribution volume at steady state and terminal half-life during cycle 1 were 317±60 ml min⁻¹ m⁻², 258±96 l m⁻² and 30.8±7.7 h, respectively. The maximum tolerated and recommended phase II dose for BMS-188797 was 110 mg m⁻² (1-h infusion, every 3 weeks) combined with cisplatin 75 mg m⁻².

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I-II study

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity profile and anti-tumor activity of paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine when administered to patients with unresectable locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and the neck (SCCHN). Twenty-seven patients were treated in a phase I-II study with gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m on days 1 and 8, escalating to a dose of 1,000 mg/m, plus escalating doses of paclitaxel (100, 135 and 175 mg/m) on day 2. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles repeated every 3 weeks. The main toxicity was myelosuppression. Other toxicities were mild and manageable. Due to grade 4 neutropenia at higher doses the recommended dose level of the gemcitabine/paclitaxel combination was 1,000/135 mg/m. Four patients achieved a partial response and no patient had a complete remission, giving an overall response rate of 14.8%. The median time of survival was 24 weeks. We conclude that the combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine is tolerated, but shows insufficient clinical activity in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN to warrant further testing.

Adding Gemcitabine to Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Combination Increases Survival in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Phase II-III Study

Purpose

Paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) is one of the reference combinations in the treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No triplet novel agent combination has until now shown superiority over a two-drug combination for advanced NSCLC. We therefore conducted a clinical trial to test if paclitaxel/carboplatin/gemcitabine (PCG) increases overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR) over PC.

Methods

Stage IIIB patients not suitable for radical radiation treatment and stage IV chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable disease and performance status of 0 to 2 were randomly assigned to PC arm (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 6 day 1/q21 days) or the PCG arm (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 6 day 1, and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 every 21 days).

Results

A total of 324 patients were randomly assigned to the two arms. The RR for PC arm and PCG arm were 20.2% and 46% (P < .0001). The median time to the progression was 5.1 months in the PC group and 7.6 months in the PCG group (P = .012; hazard ratio [HR] 1.34; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.72). Median OS was 8.3 months and 10.8 months (P = .032; HR 1.309; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.67) in favor of the PCG arm. One-year survival was 34% (PC arm) and 45% (PCG arm; P = .032). Only hematologic toxicity (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia) was significantly increased in the PCG arm and the experimental arm required more platelet and red blood cell transfusions, and more granulocyte colony-stimulating factor usage. No toxic/early deaths were observed.

Conclusion

The PCG regimen offers a significant survival advantage over PC in advanced NSCLC, making PCG a treatment option for advanced NSCLC patients.

First-Line Single Agent Treatment With Gefitinib in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Study

Purpose

We conducted a phase II study of single agent treatment with gefitinib in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to assess its efficacy and toxicity.

Patients and Methods

Patients received 250 mg doses of gefitinib daily. Administration of gefitinib was terminated if partial response (PR) was not achieved within 8 weeks or if tumor reduction was not observed within 4 weeks. In these cases, platinum-based doublet chemotherapy was given as a salvage treatment. We evaluated mutation status of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in cases with available tumor samples.

Results

Forty-two patients were enrolled between March and November 2003, with 40 of these patients being eligible. The response rate was 30% (95% CI, 17% to 47%). The most common toxicity included grade 1 or 2 acne-like rash (50%) and grade 1 diarrhea (18%). Grade 2 or 3 hepatic toxicity was observed in 8% of patients. Four patients developed grade 5 interstitial lung disease (ILD). Thirty patients received second-line chemotherapy. Median survival time was 13.9 months (95% CI, 9.1 to 18.7 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 55%. Tumor samples were available in 13 patients, including four cases of PR, six cases of stable disease, and three cases of progressive disease. EGFR mutations (deletions in exon 19 or point mutations [L858R or E746V]) were detected in four tumor tissues. All four patients with EGFR mutation achieved PR with gefitinib treatment.

Conclusion

Single agent treatment with gefitinib is active in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC, but produces unacceptably frequent ILD in the Japanese population.

Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine for previously untreated, stage IIIB-IV nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the noncisplatin-based combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine administered weekly for patients with untreated metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with Stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC, a performance status of 0-2, and no prior chemotherapy exposure were eligible. Patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 85 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 of an 8-week cycle until progression.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine eligible patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years and 14 patients were > or =70 years old. Performance status was 2 in 13 (33%) and 29 patients (75%) had Stage IV. Five patients (12.8%) developed interstitial pneumonitis and 2 of these were responsive to steroid therapy. The overall response rate was 23.1%, with no complete responses. The median survival was 32 weeks and the 1-year survival was 32%.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen of weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine has modest activity in advanced NSCLC.

Second-line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with small-cell lung cancer pretreated with platinum and etoposide: a single institution phase II trial

PURPOSE

The safety and efficacy of a combined regimen of weekly paclitaxel and gemcitabine was tested in patients with refractory and sensitive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Of the 31 patients enrolled, 10 had refractory and 21 had sensitive disease. Objective responses occurred in 8 patients (26%), including 2 out of 10 patients with refractory- and 6 out of 21 patients with sensitive SCLC. Median time to progression and median survival were 9.4 and 32 weeks, respectively.

RESULTS

The schedule was very well tolerated, with grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 26% of the patients, grade 3 neutropenia in 26%, grade 3-4 asthenia in 13% and grade 1-2 sensory neuropathy in 32%.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, this weekly schedule of paclitaxel and gemcitabine was found to have moderate activity in platinum-etoposide pretreated SCLC patients and a favorable toxicity profile.

Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the efficacy of a non-platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy of gemcitabine and vinorelbine as induction therapy prior to surgical resection in patients with stage IB-IIIA and selected stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary clinical end point was radiographic disease response rate, and the secondary end points were pathologic response rate, treatment-related toxicity, surgical resectability and outcome, and overall and disease-free survival.

METHODS

Patients underwent staging with CT of the chest and upper-abdomen, whole-body F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, bronchoscopy, and mediastinoscopy. The patients had to have medically and surgically resectable disease. Chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2), and vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2), administered on days 1, 8, 22, and 29. Imaging studies were repeated between days 43 and 50. Disease response was assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, and patients with resectable disease were offered surgery between days 50 and 70. Patients were followed up every 3 months for 2 years with chest CT.

RESULTS

Between January 2000 and March 2004, 27 patients with stage IB NSCLC, 15 patients with stage II NSCLC, and 20 patients with stage III NSCLC were entered. After induction chemotherapy 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23 to 48%) had an objective radiographic response, 2% had a complete pathologic response, 90% underwent thoracotomy, and 77% underwent a complete resection. There were four deaths in the 6-week period following surgery, and there were no deaths related to chemotherapy. There were no unexpected morbidities from surgery or chemotherapy. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 80% (95% CI, 68 to 88%) and 65% (95% CI, 50 to 76%), and the median overall survival was 38.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine results in 1-year and 2-year survival rates and a median survival time comparable to those obtained with platinum-containing doublets. However, it appears to be less efficacious in terms of radiographic and pathologic response rates compared with platinum-containing chemotherapy doublets.

Front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with irinotecan and docetaxel: A multicentre phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the irinotecan plus docetaxel combination in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with irinotecan 200mg/m2 followed by docetaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m2) support from day 2 to 9. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A partial response was achieved in 9 (23%; 95% confidence interval 9.85-36.3%) patients; stable and progressive disease were observed in 10 (25.6%) and 20 (51.4%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 7.1 months and the median time to tumor progression 3 months. The median survival time was 10.8 months and the 1-year survival 42.2%. Four (10.3%) patients developed grade 4 neutropenia and all but one were complicated with fever; there was no treatment-related death. Nine (23.1%) patients developed grade 3 or 4 diarrhea while grade 2 or 3 fatigue occurred in nine (23.1%), and grade 3 mucositis in two (2.6%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of irinotecan/docetaxel is a relatively active non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimen with manageable toxicity, which could be given in an outpatient basis; this regimen merits to be further studied in order to improve its tolerance and evaluate its clinical relevance in patients who can not tolerate platinum-based doublets.

Biweekly Administration of Cisplatin/Gemcitabine in Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

In an attempt to increase the dose intensity of cisplatin and gemcitabine given to patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsmall cell lung cancer without increasing toxicity, we have studied a biweekly administration schedule. We analyze the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

In this study, cycles of 50 mg/m2 cisplatin with 2500 mg/m2 gemcitabine were given on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. The median age of the 49 patients was 62 years and 23 were in stage IIIB patients (46.9%), whereas 26 (53.1%) were in stage IV.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 38.8%, 52.2% for stage IIIB and 26.9% for stage IV. Median survival was 48 weeks and 1-year survival was 44%, with 66.7% of stage IIIB patients and 13.3% of stage IV patients surviving for 1 year. In the study, 178 cycles were administered, a mean of 4 cycles per patient. The intensity of the 359 administrations reached 91.16% of the planned dosage, although 49 were delayed for 1 week while subjects recovered from the toxicity. There was 1 toxic death and 2 patients experienced vascular toxicity with distal arterial ischemic severe changes in their lower extremities. There were 7 episodes of grade 2 neutropenia, 2 of grade 3, and one of grade 4; however, no cases of febrile neutropenia were seen. The predominant nonhematologic toxic effects were asthenia and nausea/vomiting.

CONCLUSION

The schedule of cisplatin and gemcitabine analyzed is active with a good therapeutic index.

Phase II study of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

This phase II study evaluated the response rate and tolerability of gemcitabine–oxaliplatin chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1000 mg m⁻² on days 1 and 8, followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg m⁻² on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for up to six cycles. From February 2002 to May 2004, 60 patients were enrolled into the study in seven Italian institutions. We observed one complete response (1.7%) and 14 partial responses (23.3%), for an overall response rate of 25.0% (95% confidence interval, 14.7–37.9%). The median duration of response was 5.9 months (range 1.5–17.1 months). With a median follow-up of 6.7 months, median time to progressive disease and overall survival were 2.7 (range 1.9–3.4 months) and 7.3 months (range 7.2–8.6 months), respectively. The main grade 3–4 haematological toxicities were transient neutropenia in 11.7% and thrombocytopenia in 8.3% of the patients. Nausea/vomiting was the main grade 3–4 nonhaematological toxicity, occurring in 10.0% of the patients. Two (3.3%) patients developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. Our results show that gemcitabine–oxaliplatin chemotherapy is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC, deserving further study, especially for patients not eligible to receive cisplatin.

Randomized phase II trial of three schedules of pemetrexed and gemcitabine as front-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

A randomized three-arm phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the optimum administration schedule of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to three schedules of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2, separated by a 90-minute interval, on a 21-day cycle as follows: schedule A, pemetrexed followed by gemcitabine on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 8; schedule B, gemcitabine followed by pemetrexed on day 1 and gemcitabine on day 8; and schedule C, gemcitabine on day 1 and pemetrexed followed by gemcitabine on day 8.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two eligible patients (schedule A, n = 59; schedule B, n = 31, and schedule C, n = 62) received a median of five (schedule A), two (schedule B), and four (schedule C) treatment cycles. Overall, 66% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Common grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities were dyspnea (11%), fatigue (16%), and transaminase elevation (9%). Schedule A seemed less toxic compared with schedule C (grade 3 or 4 events: 86% v 94%, respectively; P = .19; grade 4 events: 39% v 48%, respectively; P = .30). Schedule B was closed at interim analysis for inferior efficacy. Schedule A, with a confirmed response rate of 31% (95% CI, 20% to 45%), met the protocol-defined efficacy criteria, whereas schedule C, with a confirmed response rate of 16.1% (95% CI, 11% to 34%), did not. Median survival time and time to progression were 11.4 and 4.4 months, respectively, with no observable difference between the arms.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed and gemcitabine administered as outlined for schedule A met the protocol-defined efficacy criteria, was less toxic compared with the other treatment schedules, and should be further evaluated.

A phase I/II study of pemetrexed and vinorelbine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Pemetrexed and vinorelbine are active antineoplastic agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase I objectives include maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose determination, and pharmacokinetics of the pemetrexed-vinorelbine doublet in locally advanced or metastatic solid tumor patients (pts). Phase II objectives include tumor response evaluation, efficacy, and toxicity for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Phase I pts received pemetrexed (day 1, 300-700 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (days 1 and 8, 15-30 mg/m2) every 21 days. Pharmacokinetics determined at cycle 1. Beginning with dose-level 3, folic acid and Vitamin B12 supplementation were given.

RESULTS

Thirty-one phase I pts were enrolled. MTD was pemetrexed 700 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2; and recommended phase II dose was pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2. When administered in combination, pemetrexed and vinorelbine pharmacokinetics were consistent with single-agent administration. Thirty-seven (36 chemonaive) phase II NSCLC pts received pemetrexed-vinorelbine. Evaluable tumor response was 40%, with intent-to-treat 38%. One drug-related death occurred from febrile neutropenia with Staphylococcal infection. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (65%) and febrile neutropenia (11%), while prevalent grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was fatigue (27%).

CONCLUSION

The pemetrexed-vinorelbine combination is well tolerated and shows activity as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC patients.

Combination of chemotherapy without platinum compounds in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review of phase III trials

Hitherto, platinum-based combinations are world-wide accepted regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to a clear survival improvement using various platinum-based doublets in comparison with best supportive care only. However, treatment-allocated time and period with high grade toxicity could be considered as wasted from the patient point of view and the high toxicity induced by platinum-based doublets urges the research of alternate treatments. Newest cytotoxic compounds as so-called third generation drugs (i.e. vinorelbine, docetaxel, paclitaxel and gemcitabine) yield a better efficacy/toxicity ratio. Platinum-free doublet regimens based on these new drugs are expected to offer the patients an improved survival without decreasing his quality of life. Recent update of ASCO guidelines recommended that "for stage IV NSCLC, [...] non-platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens may be used as alternatives to platinum-based regimens in the first line." In spite of this recommendation, the case of non-platinum containing regimen is still debatable and this review deals with methodological statements highlighted by the reports of 14 recently reported randomised studies comparing non-platinum with platinum-based doublets (174 words).

Taxanes as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline

This evidence-based practice guideline on the use of paclitaxel (Taxol) or docetaxel (Taxotere) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who are candidates for palliative first-line chemotherapy is based on a systematic search and review of literature published in full or in abstract form between 1985 and April 2005. Forty-five randomized trials, including 11 abstracts, were reviewed and clinicians in the province of Ontario, Canada, provided feedback on a draft version of the guideline. Two phase III trials detected a statistically significant survival advantage for a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with best supportive care versus best supportive care alone. Among the nine fully published phase III trials comparing platinum-based chemotherapies, taxane-platinum combinations achieved higher response rates compared with older chemotherapy combinations, although significantly longer survival was observed only for docetaxel-cisplatin compared with vindesine-cisplatin. Response rates and survival were generally not significantly different for taxane-platinum combinations compared with other current chemotherapy combinations, although the toxicity profile of the regimens varied. However, in one large trial, improved tumor response and modest survival and quality of life benefits were associated with docetaxel-cisplatin compared with vinorelbine-cisplatin. No statistically significant survival differences were detected in the three fully published phase III trials comparing a taxane-gemcitabine combination with a taxane-platinum regimen.

RECOMMENDATIONS

(i) paclitaxel or docetaxel combined with cisplatin is recommended as one of a number of chemotherapy options for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients with a good performance status; (ii) carboplatin may be combined with a taxane if a patient is unable or unwilling to take cisplatin; (iii) a taxane-gemcitabine combination may be considered for patients with a contraindication to cisplatin and carboplatin; (iv) no firm recommendation can be made on the optimal dose and schedule of taxane-based chemotherapy; however, commonly used regimens include cisplatin 75 mg/m2 combined with either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 (24-h infusion) and carboplatin AUC 6 combined with paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 (3-h infusion); (v) a single-agent taxane may be used if combination chemotherapy is considered inappropriate.

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GV) versus cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine (CGV) as first-line treatment in advanced non small cell lung cancer: Results of a prospective randomized phase II study

The objective of this study was to assess whether adding cisplatin to gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination improves the clinical outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC; age < or = 75 years: Karnofsky performance status > or = 60%, and with adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were randomized into 2 treatment groups to receive Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 + vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 (GV group), or cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 (CGV group). All drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 every three weeks: From September 1999 to March 2003, 114 patients were enrolled. No statistically significant difference was observed in GV vs CGV group in objective response (37 versus 47%, respectively; P = 0.5), median time to progression (5 versus 5.8 months; P = 0.6), overall survival (9 versus 10 months; P = 0.9) and 1-year survival (26 versus 28%; P = 0.9). Conversely, toxicities were significantly higher for CGV, including grade 3-4 neutropenia (24 versus 45%); neutropenic fever (4 versus 14%, including one toxic death); grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (2 versus 14%); and grade 3-4 emesis (2 versus 14%). Our results suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is less toxic than three-drug combination with cisplatin while showing similar efficacy.

Health related quality of life outcomes in cancer clinical trials

Over the last decade, health related quality of life (HRQOL) investigations have become an increasingly important part of many cancer clinical trial research programs. This paper presents a review of all HRQOL studies published by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), one of the largest clinical trials organisations in Europe. The findings highlight 24 clinical trials that have been published to date, enrolling over 9000 patients. HRQOL is fully integrated into EORTC phase III trials. In many trials, HRQOL provides a valuable source of additional information useful to both clinician and patient when making treatment decisions. Furthermore, several trials have found that the combined use of clinical information along with HRQOL data has led to the development of new standards of care in several different cancer sites. With more than 40 ongoing HRQOL studies in the EORTC, we expect HRQOL to play an even greater role over the coming decade in helping establish the optimal treatment and care approach for cancer patients.

Activity of carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer pre-treated with a non-platinum combination

To assess the efficacy of carboplatin when used as a single agent in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who are refractory to chemotherapy with a non-platinum combination, we recruited patients (n=40) NSCLC patients, 36 of whom were males, with an overall median age of 59 years (range 39-79) and Karnofsky Performance Status of 70% (range 60-90%). At baseline, the patients had a median of one disease site (range 1-3) and had received a median of one prior regimen (range 1-2). Carboplatin was administered (i.v.; AUC=6) every 3 weeks until disease progression or non-acceptable toxicity was reached. In total 169 cycles were administered (median 4 cycles/patient; range 1-8). Main toxicities were grade 2-3 anemia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (22.5% of patients). Overall clinical response rate was 10% (4 partial responses); 26 patients (65%) had stable disease and 8 (20%) had disease progression. Median time to progression and median survival time were 90 and 187 days, respectively. One year survival rate was 13%. We conclude that carboplatin shows minimal toxicity with a discrete anti-tumor activity in patients with NSCLC and who are refractory to non-platinum combinations.

Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing drug therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is increasingly recognized as an important outcome in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This article reviews HRQoL data from a literature search that identified 32 randomized trials of conventional chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. In common with much of the research in this area, interpretation of the data from some trials was limited by weaknesses in data collection and reporting of HRQoL results. Nevertheless, the trials comparing chemotherapy with best supportive care consistently identified that some components of HRQoL improved with chemotherapy, despite the associated toxicity of many of the regimens used. Novel targeted therapies promise efficacy without the toxicity typically observed with conventional chemotherapy, and this article also reviews HRQoL data from trials of gefitinib (IRESSA), the first epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor to have demonstrated prospectively defined, clinically meaningful improvements in disease-related symptoms and HRQoL in patients with advanced NSCLC. In all trials reviewed, HRQoL findings to date support the incorporation of well-validated measures of HRQoL and symptom improvement in all future trials of drug therapy in advanced NSCLC patients. Ideally, the trials should have a prospectively defined HRQoL hypothesis, include measures to improve compliance with HRQoL assessments, and address the clinical meaning of the HRQoL findings.

Advances in Cytotoxic Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Improvements in drug development and clinical trial design have resulted in a wider range of treatment options for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combination chemotherapy is the standard of care for medically fit patients. A variety of chemotherapeutic doublets, including nonplatinum combinations, with similar clinical activity are now available, allowing oncologists to match acceptable toxicity profiles to individual patients' comorbidities and preferences. Single-agent treatment of refractory or recurrent disease has been shown to improve survival and offer improved quality of life (QOL). For special patient populations, such as the elderly and patients with limited performance status (PS), treatment with single-agent chemotherapy results in modest survival benefits and combination chemotherapy may be appropriate for some of these patients.

Italian clinical research in non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths in both men and women worldwide and has a poor prognosis. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 80% of all lung cancers. Surgery is the only curative treatment of NSCLC but only 15-20% of tumours can be radically resected with a survival of about 40% at 5 years. Considering these disappointing results NSCLC is one of the most frequent subjects of clinical research worldwide. Italy is playing an important role in the clinical research of NSCLC performing phase I, II and III trials, prevalently by cooperative groups, and achieving important results that contributed to define the standard treatment for NSCLC patients. In particular, Italy is leader in the clinical research of the treatment of advanced NSCLC elderly patients. Today, large controlled clinical trials are ongoing. In this paper we analyse and discuss the main trials performed by Italian groups in the fields of NSCLC.

Impact of emesis on clinical and economic outcomes of cancer therapy with highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens: a retrospective analysis of three clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

It is a current hypothesis that chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) may ultimately impede the clinical success of cancer treatments by hindering patients' adherence to the optimal treatment schedule. The aim of this study is to examine clinical trial data retrospectively for possible evidence of such a detrimental impact of CINV.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from three recent European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trials of highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy in diverse patient populations were analyzed retrospectively for incidence and possible impact of CINV. Data on the incidence of emesis are presented as simple descriptive analyses, while the hypothetical impact of CINV on clinical outcomes and on the patients' length of hospital stays is analyzed by means of multivariate regression analysis techniques to control for confounding variables.

MAIN RESULTS

Between 42 and 59% of the patients in the trials experienced at least one episode of nausea of NCIC grade 2 or worse, while the incidence of vomiting of similar grade was between 31 and 58%. Only in one of the trials could the determinants of the adherence to protocol therapy be assessed, statistically significant variables were the severity of emesis (p < 0.0001) and other toxicities combined (p < 0.019). In turn, a Cox regression showed adherence to protocol therapy and other toxicities as the only statistically significant determinants of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown a discernible detrimental impact of CINV on patients' adherence to protocol therapy and, indirectly, on survival in one of the three trials examined. Further studies are required to substantiate this finding.

Gemcitabine–docetaxel versus cisplatin–vinorelbine in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III study addressing the case for cisplatin

BACKGROUND

This multicenter, randomized, phase III study compared the efficacy, including progression-free survival (PFS), and safety of gemcitabine-docetaxel (GD) combination versus cisplatin-vinorelbine (CV) in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated with GD (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) day 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or CV (cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) day 1 plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15 and 22, every 4 weeks for six cycles).

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients were enrolled (155 GD and 156 CV). Neither PFS nor overall survival differed significantly between the two arms (median PFS 4.2 and 4 months; median survival 11.1 and 9.6 months; 1-year survival 46% and 42%, for GD and CV, respectively). For the GD arm compared with the CV arm, the hazard ratio for PFS was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.32], and for overall survival, it was 0.90 (95% CI 0.70-1.16). Objective response rates did not differ significantly (31% for GD, 35.9% for CV). Myelosupression, emesis and frequency of febrile neutropenia were less pronounced on the GD arm, whereas fluid retention and pulmonary events were more pronounced. The CV arm experienced a higher number of serious adverse events and a lower compliance with the protocol. There was no quality of life (QoL) difference between arms. Median time to definite impairment of health-related QoL was 153 and 168 days in GD and CV arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no advantage in PFS with GD compared with CV; however, the CV regimen had higher rate of toxic events, mainly myelosuppression. The herein, non-platinum-containing regimen could be considered as a rational alternative to the cisplatin-based doublet.

Prospective evaluation of major vascular events in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine

BACKGROUND

Cancer and cisplatin-based chemotherapy both are well recognized risk factors for coagulation disorders and thrombosis. However, vascular events (VEs) seldom are considered adverse effects of treatment and may not even be taken into account in reports of chemotherapy trials.

METHODS

VEs were recorded prospectively in a population of patients with nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who were treated consecutively with cisplatin and gemcitabine using a diagnostic flow chart based on a thorough clinical examination, hematologic and coagulative parameters, and imaging assessments when appropriate.

RESULTS

From January, 2000 to January 2003, 108 patients with Stage III-IV NSCLC underwent chemotherapy and were evaluated. Overall, 22 VEs occurred in 19 patients (17.6%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.3-24.8%), including 10 arterial VEs (2 myocardial infarctions, 7 lower limb arterial thrombosis, and 1 ischemic stroke) and 12 venous VEs (3 catheter-related upper limb VEs, 6 venous thrombosis of the lower limb, and 3 pulmonary embolisms). The cumulative proportion of VEs at 1 year after the start of chemotherapy was 22.0% (95% CI, 12.7-31.3%). Four patients died due to the VE (overall mortality, 3.7%), and 3 patients needed surgical revascularization. In the other patients, conservative medical treatment was effective. Baseline patient-related and disease-related characteristics of the patients with VEs did not differ significantly from the characteristics of patients without VE; liver and brain metastases were more frequent in patients with VE, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Response rates were similar in the two groups. A double VE was detected in three patients who were given further chemotherapy after resolution of the first event.

CONCLUSIONS

VEs were a common finding in chemotherapy-treated NSCLC patients. Chemotherapy itself seem to be a powerful risk factor for VE. Strategies to predict the occurrence of VEs should be developed to spare this life-threatening toxicity.

Multicentre randomised phase III study comparing the same dose and schedule of cisplatin plus the same schedule of vinorelbine or gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

This study compares two cytotoxic regimens comprising the same dose and schedule of cisplatin (CP) plus vinorelbine (VNR) or gemcitabine (GEM) administered under the same schedule to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). From April 1998 to February 2003, 285 patients were randomised to receive either VNR 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus plus CP 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 (regimen A) or GEM 1200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 as an i.v. 30-min infusion plus CP 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 (regimen B). Both treatments were recycled every 21 days. If no progression had occurred after six cycles, the patients continued to receive VNR or GEM monochemotherapy weekly. Cross-over of the two single agents was considered if disease progression occurred. Objective response (OR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. 272 patients were ultimately eligible (137 on A and 135 on B). Their main characteristics were: male/female ratio 214/58; median age 63 (range 32-77) years; median Karnofsky Performance Status (PS) 80 (range 70-100); stage IIIB 34%, stage IV 61%, recurrent disease 5%; histology - epidermoid 29%, adenocarcinoma 53%, other NSCLC 18%. The characteristics of the patients in the two arms were well matched. The following response rates were observed in regimens A and B, respectively: complete response (CR) 0.7% and 3.7%, partial response (PR) 31.9% and 22.2% (P = 0.321). Median CR+PR duration was 8 months in both arms. Clinical benefit represented by an improvement in symptoms was evident in 25.7% and 28.1%, respectively. Median TTP was 5 months in both arms and median OS 11 months in both arms. Grade III-IV neutropenia occurred in 30.7% and 17.7% of the patients in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.017); thrombocytopenia occurred in 0% and 9.3% (P = 0.004), respectively. No difference in the incidence of anaemia was observed. Non-haematological toxicity was generally mild: a higher incidence of grade 1-2 peripheral neurotoxicity and grade 1-2 local toxicity with regimen A and grade 1-2 liver toxicity with regimen B was reported. A pharmaco-economic comparison showed a difference between the two doublets, principally due to the different costs of VNR and GEM. Under the study conditions the combination of VNR or GEM with the same dose and schedule of CP produced similar OR, clinical benefits, TTP and OS in advanced NSCLC, and only mild toxicological differences were observed. Pharmaco-economic evaluation favoured the CP + VNR doublet.

The importance of chemotherapy dose intensity in lung cancer

The evidence for the importance of maintaining full dose on schedule chemotherapy for lung cancer varies considerably by histologic type. Several studies have evaluated chemotherapy dose and dose intensity in small cell lung cancer; fewer studies have evaluated the importance of chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. The current guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend adjuvant chemotherapy in most patients with resectable disease, and there is increasing evidence that chemotherapy benefits elderly patients as much as younger patients. Clinical trials in the setting of palliative treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer have focused on testing new regimens rather than evaluating the impact of maintaining the dose and schedule of standard chemotherapy regimens. However, in light of the potential curative role of chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting, the optimal doses and schedules of these regimens may have an important impact on outcomes. In addition, data suggest that responses in the neoadjuvant setting correlate with survival, and this may also be an appropriate setting in which to test the effect of the chemotherapy dose and schedule. Survival is the primary measure of treatment efficacy, but other end points, such as quality of life and disease stability, should also be considered in advanced disease. Because new regimens will shape the choice of treatment in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, it is important to determine the significance of maintaining full dose on schedule with conventional chemotherapy regimens to ensure optimal outcomes in the treatment of lung cancer.

A phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel and gemctiabine infused at a constant rate in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel both have significant single agent activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because both are cell cycle and phase specific in their mechanism of action, frequent exposure should optimize activity. Phase I data support that gemcitabine is maximally converted to the active metabolite when it is infused at a rate of 10 mg/(m2 min). Based on this, we designed a phase II trial to examine gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 infused over 80 min with paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 infused over 3 h both on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days as first line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The primary objectives were to assess the response rate, toxicity and survival of the combination in advanced NSCLC. Secondary objectives were to determine the effect of paclitaxel on the pharmacokinetic (PK) distribution of gemcitabine, the ability to achieve a concentration of 10-20 microM when gemcitabine was infused at a rate of 10 mg/(m2 min), as well as to assess the quality of life (QOL) with the functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung (FACT-L) questionnaire.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC, no prior treatment, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1, adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function were eligible for this trial. Paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 was infused over 3 h, followed by gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 infused over 80 min on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for the first 2 patients, and then amended to days 1 and 8 every 21 days after the first 2 patients required day 15 dose omissions due to myelosupression.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were treated. Nine PS = 0; 28 PS = 1; Stage IIIB = 3, Stage IV = 36; median age 62 (range: 39-77). A median of six cycles (range: 0-10) was delivered. Grade 3-4 toxicities observed in > or =10% of patients included leucopenia in 26%, neutropenia in 28%, dyspnea in 13%, febrile neutropenia in 3% (1 patient). Fourteen of 39 (35%, 95% CI: 21-53%) patients had a partial response (PR), 14 of 39 (35%, 95% CI: 21-53%) had stable disease (SD) and 5 patients (13%, 95% CI: 4-27%) had progressive (PD). Median survival was 10.4 months (95% CI: 5.3-13.6). One-and two-year survival rates were 35% (95% CI: 21-53%) and 5% (95% CI: 0.6-17%), respectively. QOL as measured by the FACT-L and the trial outcome index (TOI) did not change significantly from baseline over the course of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine is an active and well-tolerated combination in advanced NSCLC. Patients on this trial had no significant change in their QOL as assessed by the FACT-L questionnaire.

Sequential chemotherapy of cisplatin and vinorelbine followed by paclitaxel and gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine the activity and safety of a sequential regimen of cisplatin and vinorelbine followed by paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment was two cycles of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks followed by two cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients with inoperable NSCLC, performance status 2 or less were enrolled, including 19 patients with brain lesions. There were 23 partial responses (42%; 95% confidence interval 29-55). The median time to progression and overall survival were 5.8 and 10.3 months, respectively (6.5 and 12.8 in the patient subset without brain metastases). One-year survival rate was 47.5%. Grade III/IV neutropenia was the major side effect; it occurred in 56% of patients and was mainly limited to the first two chemotherapy cycles with cisplatin and vinorelbine.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential combination of cisplatin and vinorelbine followed by paclitaxel and gemcitabine is a manageable and active regimen for patients with NSCLC. It deserves to be tested against a standard two-drug scheme in a phase III trial.

Phase II randomized trial of vinorelbine and gemcitabine versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare quality of life and overall toxicity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with vinorelbine-gemcitabine (VG) or carboplatin-paclitaxel (Taxol) (CP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 165 previously untreated patients were randomized to the two regimens. Quality of life was assessed by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS). Overall toxicity and secondary efficacy end points were evaluated by standard WHO criteria.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in overall quality of life between the two treatments. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia, were more common in the CP arm, whereas constipation was more frequent in the VG arm. Response rates were 14.6% in the VG arm and 16.9% in the CP arm. Median survival times were 7.8 and 8.6 months, and 1 year survival rates were 38.4% and 31.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with VG experienced lower toxicity, but overall quality of life was similar in both arms. Efficacy seemed comparable between VG and CP. Our study shows that VG is a viable alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Economic evaluation of three two-drug chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

During the 1990s, a number of new cytotoxic agents with clinically relevant activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and with a more favourable therapeutic index than drugs already in use, became available. Given the high prices of these new drugs and the large number of patients affected, it is important to compare the relative benefits and costs of these treatments with the existing regimens before treatment policy decisions are changed.

PURPOSE

An economic evaluation of three different regimens of chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC was performed from the perspective of the Dutch health insurance system using tariffs valid for 2002. The economic evaluation was integrated into a phase III clinical trial in which the reference regimen cisplatin-paclitaxel was compared with two experimental regimens: cisplatin-gemcitabine and gemcitabine-paclitaxel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Unit costs were applied to resource use data collected prospectively on case report forms during the trial. The average total (uncensored) cost per patient was determined for each of the treatment groups. The principal outcome measure for the economic evaluation was the estimated mean survival time per treatment group. This outcome was then incorporated into incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on costs corrected for censoring. The impact of uncertainty was assessed by bootstrap techniques, and the analysis and interpretation of the data focused on the bivariate density of differences in outcomes and costs in the incremental cost-effectiveness plane. The final results were summarised by the derivation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

RESULTS

The estimated mean survival time was equivalent in the two cisplatin-based regimens with largely overlapping confidence intervals. There was a 99% probability that cisplatin-gemcitabine is the least costly regimen of the two and a 72% probability that this regimen reduces costs while at the same time improving survival. Compared with cisplatin-paclitaxel, the gemcitabine-paclitaxel regimen engendered a borderline significant reduction in mean survival time combined with an almost 90% probability of an increase in costs.

CONCLUSION

The two cisplatin-based regimens are equivalent in terms of survival, but cisplatin-gemcitabine may reduce costs by approximately 2000 Euros patient compared with cisplatin-paclitaxel. Gemcitabine-paclitaxel is a dominated option with higher costs and a reduction in mean survival time compared with cisplatin-paclitaxel.

Survival of stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients who received chemotherapy but did not participate in clinical trials

This study was designed to compare the outcome of stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients who were treated with chemotherapy but did not participate in clinical trials of first-line chemotherapy with patients that had been treated with three clinical trials during this period. From October 1997 through October 1999, 132 patients (stage IIIB, 31 patients; stage IV, 101 patients) who received at least one dose of chemotherapy but did not participate in first-line chemotherapy trials were included. Response was evaluated in 132 patients. Six (4.5%) achieved a complete response and 32 (24.3%) achieved a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 28.8% (95% CI, 21.0-36.6). The median overall survival for all 132 patients was 11 months (95% CI, 9.5-12.5), and the median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-5.0). The median overall and progression-free survival for patients (N=129) who participated in one of three clinical trials during the study period was 13.5 months (95% CI, 11.2-15.8) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.9-6.0), respectively. There was no significant difference in overall and progression-free survival between patients who did or did not participate in clinical trials (overall survival: P=0.36; progression-free survival: P=0.57). Our data suggest that the survival of patients who received chemotherapy but did not participate in clinical trials was similar to patients participated in clinical trials.

Role of chemotherapy in patients with poor performance status and advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer remains an important area of research, with many questions about the use of chemotherapy still unanswered. It is now recognized that chemotherapy improves survival and alleviates disease-related symptoms in the population with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is unknown whether these benefits apply to patients with poor performance status (PS). These patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS2) have inferior outcomes compared with more fit patients, and historically, they have been excluded from clinical trials. In other trials with broader eligibility, PS2 patients comprised fewer than 20% of the study populations. These factors have led to difficulty in ascertaining true outcomes in the PS2 patient population. However, the PS2 population accounts for a significant portion (up to 30% to 40%) of patients in oncology practice, and emerging data suggest that these patients may in fact garner benefits, such as prolonged survival and improved quality of life, from chemotherapy. Studies with single-agent vinorelbine or paclitaxel have shown improved survival with chemotherapy versus supportive care that remain significant when stratified by PS. A recent subset analysis of PS2 patients enrolled in a trial comparing carboplatin and paclitaxel with single-agent paclitaxel suggests that combination chemotherapy is a feasible option and is potentially preferable to single-agent therapy. Importantly, several analyses have shown that toxicity is not necessarily worse in this population compared with more fit patients. Because optimal agents or combinations have not been defined, novel strategies and therapeutics are urgently needed in this population.

Challenges in defining and identifying patients with non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status

Performance status (PS), a subjective measure of the functional status of a patient with cancer and his or her ability to perform normal activities, is influenced both by tumor-related and by comorbidity-related factors. It is a reliable independent prognostic indicator for survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with a poor PS (PS2) constitute up to 30% to 40% of the population of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, yet they are underrepresented in clinical trials. These patients are heterogeneous, which makes it challenging to use their PS scores alone to guide their therapy. A greater understanding of PS scores and the factors that affect them can be gained through PS2-specific clinical trials, which can lead to the development of better PS instruments to aid in making therapeutic decisions.