Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer

A Phase II Clinical Trial of CPI-613 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a common lung cancer which presents with extensive stage disease at time of diagnosis in two-thirds of patients. For treatment of advanced disease, traditional platinum doublet chemotherapy induces response rates up to 80% but with few durable responses. CPI-613 is a novel anti-cancer agent that selectively inhibits the altered form of mitochondrial energy metabolism in tumor cells.

Methods

We evaluated CPI-613 with a single-arm, open-label phase II study in patients with relapsed or refractory SCLC. CPI-613 was given at a dose of 3,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 of weeks 1–3 of 4 week cycle. The primary outcome was response rate as assessed by CT imaging using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Twelve patients were accrued (median age 57yo) who had previously received between 1 and 4 lines of chemotherapy (median 1) for SCLC with a treatment-free interval of less than 60 days in 9 of the 12 patients.

Results

No complete or partial responses were seen. Ten patients (83%) progressed as best response and 2 (17%) were not evaluable for response. Median time to progression was 1.7 months (range 0.7 to 1.8 months). Eleven patients (92%) died with median overall survival of 4.3 months (range 1.2 to 18.2 months). The study was closed early due to lack of efficacy. Of note, three out of three patients who progressed after CPI-613 and were subsequently treated with standard topotecan then demonstrated treatment response with survival for 18.2, 7.4, and 5.1 months. We conducted laboratory studies which found synergy in-vitro for CPI-613 with topotecan.

Conclusions

Single agent CPI-613 had no efficacy in this study. Further study of CPI 613 in combination with a topoisomerase inhibitor is warranted.

Targeting angiogenesis in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive and lethal malignancy. Despite high initial response rates to systemic chemotherapy, the disease eventually relapses; further treatment only modestly improves outcomes and overall survival (OS) for patients with extensive stage disease is less than one year. Little progress has been made during the past decades, with no new drugs approved. Consequently, the development of novel strategies is an unmet need. The inhibition of angiogenesis, a defining characteristic of cancer, has demonstrated modest efficacy in several human malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, results from clinical trials in SCLC have been disappointing, and no anti-angiogenic agent has received regulatory approval due to lack of clinical efficacy. The elucidation of underlying mechanisms responsible for tumor resistance to angiogenic therapy and the simultaneous blockade of multiple elements that play a role in angiogenesis need to be further explored.

Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in the treatment of lung cancer

In recent years major advances in the field of molecular profiling of non-small cell lung cancer led to the identification of targetable driver mutations and revolutionized the treatment of specific patient subsets. However, the majority of NSCLC tumors do not harbor these genomic events. On the other hand, current studies have confirmed an expanding role for immunotherapy in lung cancer and new agents, such as inhibitors of the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis have been introduced in the treatment armamentarium. The monoclonal antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab targeting PD-1 resulted in superior survival when compared to standard second line chemotherapy within the context of randomized trials and received regulatory approval. Moreover, several other anti-PD-L1 antibodies have demonstrated encouraging preliminary efficacy and multiple clinical trials in various settings during the disease trajectory are currently underway. Early immunotherapy trials have also illustrated the potential of PD-1 blockade in small cell lung cancer treatment, a disease for which major advances in systemic therapy are lacking. The currently available clinical data on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition in lung cancer are summarized in this review.

Efficacy of topotecan in pretreated metastatic poorly differentiated extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma

Therapeutic options for metastatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) after prior platinum-based chemotherapy are limited. Topotecan is an approved second-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). NEC is often considered to show a biological behavior similar to SCLC. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of topotecan in pretreated metastatic NEC patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated with topotecan for metastatic NEC who presented at our center between January 2005 and December 2014 (n = 30). All 30 patients had received at least a platinum and etoposide containing regimen as prior chemotherapy. Median proliferation rate (Ki67) was 80%. As best response to topotecan five patients showed a stable disease, two patients a partial remission, resulting in a disease control rate of 23%. Of the remaining 23 patients, 14 (47%) showed a progressive disease, nine (30%) died before radiologic response could be evaluated. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after start of topotecan was 2.1 and 4.1 months, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, patients with unknown primary (vs. those with a known primary) showed a significantly prolonged PFS of 3.5 months (vs. 1.9, P = 0.0107) and OS of 6.7 months (vs. 2.6 months, P = 0.0168). Grade 3/4 hematotoxicity was observed in 60% of patients. Topotecan shows only moderate antitumor activity in metastatic NEC. Disease control rate is lower than reported for SCLC. However, antitumor activity of topotecan seems higher in patients with unknown primary.

Therapies in the pipeline for small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION OR BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents ~15% of all cases of lung cancer and is characterized by a rapid tumour doubling time, early onset disease dissemination and high sensitivity to chemotherapy.

SOURCES OF DATA

We searched MEDLINE and OVID databases for articles in English published from January 1980 to February 2015.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Platinum-based chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation are standard of care. Benefit from second-line chemotherapy is limited.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The role of platinum/irinotecan chemotherapy in the Western population and the role of maintenance therapies remain to be established.

GROWING POINTS

Knowledge of the biology of SCLC has expanded exponentially and many potential therapeutic targets have been identified.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

The use of circulating tumour cells can help investigating molecular alterations occurring within tumour cells, understanding drug resistance mechanisms and evaluating new treatments.

A phase II study of topotecan and cisplatin with sequential thoracic radiotherapy in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group 0102

PURPOSE

The treatment outcome in elderly patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) remains poor. We carried out a phase II trial of split topotecan and cisplatin (TP) therapy and sequential thoracic radiotherapy for elderly LD-SCLC patients as a follow-up to our previous phase I trial.

METHODS

In total, 30 patients aged 76 years or older, with untreated LD-SCLC were enrolled. Four courses of topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2), days 1-3) and cisplatin (20 mg/m(2), days 1-3) were administered, followed by thoracic radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/day, total of 45 Gy). The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

The trial was terminated early with 22 patients because of slow accrual. Their median age was 79 years. The median number of courses of chemotherapy administered was three, and the actual completion rate of the entire treatment course was 41 %. The ORR was 68 % with a 95 % confidence interval of 47-89 % (15/22 cases). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.1 and 22.2 months, respectively. The main toxicity was myelosuppression, with grades 3-4 neutropenia (96 %), thrombocytopenia (50 %), and febrile neutropenia (32 %).

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen produced a favorable survival outcome, despite moderate-to-severe toxicity profiles. Further efforts are necessary to define an optimal regimen for elderly patients with limited SCLC.

Re-irradiation for locoregionally recurrent tumors of the thorax: a single-institution, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Re-irradiation (re-RT) of the thorax is challenging due to the impact of prior therapies on normal tissues, and there are few reports of definitive re-RT. The treatment toxicities and efficacy of re-RT are not well known. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of definitive re-RT of the thorax.

METHODS

Patients who were treated with thoracic re-RT between March 2007 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary and re-irradiation plans were required to have an overlap of dose distributions for the 80 % isodose level. All doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). When possible, analysis of dose accumulation was carried out using the medical image merge (MIM) (®) software program (version 6.5, MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH). Administration dosages for organs at risk were defined.

RESULTS

Fourteen (67 %) and seven (33 %) patients with non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) and small cell carcinoma (SCLC), respectively, were identified. The patients' median age was 72 (range 53-85) years. Fifteen patients (71 %) had "proximal" tumors, defined as tumors at the distal 2 cm of the trachea, carina, and main bronchi. The median interval from initial RT to re-RT was 26.8 (range 11.4-92.3) months. Re-RT was delivered by X-ray beam and proton beam therapy in 20 (95 %) patients and 1 (5 %) patient, respectively. The median radiation dose of re-RT was 60 (range 54-87.5) Gy10 and 50 (range 50.0-87.5) Gy10 for patients with NSCLC and SCLC, respectively. Grade 3 acute radiation pneumonitis occurred in only one patient. There were no other serious complications. The median follow-up time was 22.1 (range 2.3-56.4) months. The median local progression-free survival time (LPFS) and overall survival time (OS) were 12.9 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 8.9-27.9) months and 31.4 (95 % CI: 16.9-45.9) months, respectively. Patients receiving ≥ 60 Gy10 at re-RT had longer LPFS (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Good safety with longer OS than in previous reports was demonstrated. Re-RT seems to be a promising treatment option. Further study to define the risk-benefit ratios is necessary.

Checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: latest developments and clinical potential

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. The vast majority of patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. After first-line chemotherapy or biomarker-matched targeted therapy, only suitable for a small group of patients, further systemic therapy options rendered very limited, if any, benefit until recently. Checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are currently an established second-line therapeutic option. In this manuscript, we review the mechanism of action of checkpoint inhibitors, present the available data with approved and experimental agents, discuss the progress that has already been made in the field, as well as toxicity awareness, and future perspectives.

PARP Inhibitor Activity Correlates with SLFN11 Expression and Demonstrates Synergy with Temozolomide in Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are a novel class of small molecule therapeutics for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Identification of predictors of response would advance our understanding, and guide clinical application, of this therapeutic strategy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Efficacy of PARP inhibitors olaparib, rucaparib, and veliparib, as well as etoposide and cisplatin in SCLC cell lines, and gene expression correlates, was analyzed using public datasets. HRD genomic scar scores were calculated from Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays. In vitro talazoparib efficacy was measured by cell viability assays. For functional studies, CRISPR/Cas9 and shRNA were used for genomic editing and transcript knockdown, respectively. Protein levels were assessed by immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Quantitative synergy of talazoparib and temozolomide was determined in vitro In vivo efficacy of talazoparib, temozolomide, and the combination was assessed in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models.

RESULTS

We identified SLFN11, but not HRD genomic scars, as a consistent correlate of response to all three PARPi assessed, with loss of SLFN11 conferring resistance to PARPi. We confirmed these findings in vivo across multiple PDX and defined IHC staining for SLFN11 as a predictor of talazoparib response. As temozolomide has activity in SCLC, we investigated combination therapy with talazoparib and found marked synergy in vitro and efficacy in vivo, which did not solely depend on SLFN11 or MGMT status.

CONCLUSIONS

SLFN11 is a relevant predictive biomarker of sensitivity to PARP inhibitor monotherapy in SCLC and we identify combinatorial therapy with TMZ as a particularly promising therapeutic strategy that warrants further clinical investigation. Clin Cancer Res; 23(2); 523-35. ©2016 AACR.

Systemic therapies for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of malignancies, characterised by production of hormones and vasoactive peptides. The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) is rising, and they have the highest prevalence amongst upper gastro-intestinal tumors. Diagnosis remains challenging due to wide variations in presentation and slow onset of symptoms. A multi-disciplinary approach is vital in appropriately managing the diverse spectrum of GEP-NET. Areas covered: Investigations in GEP-NET and biomarkers are described. Moreover, all available therapeutic options for GEP-NET including surgery, somatostatin analogues, targeted agents, Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy and chemotherapy are also discussed. Expert commentary: The landscape of management has changed significantly in the last decade as a result of many practice-changing clinical trials. Long- acting somatostatin analogues are used not only for symptom control but also for their anti-proliferative effect. Targeted agents, such as everolimus and sunitinib, have improved PFS in GEP-NET. The recently presented NETTER-1 trial confirms the place of peptide receptor radionuclide treatment (PRRT) in treating NET. While chemotherapy remained an important option for high grade tumors. Despite promising results from recent trials, challenges include establishing the optimal sequencing of therapies to optimize outcome and preserve the quality of life.

Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer: Progress and Updates

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a major public health problem and accounts for 10% to 15% of all lung cancers. It has unique clinical features such as rapid growth, early metastatic spread, and widespread dissemination. A platinum-etoposide combination is the backbone treatment of SCLC; addition of thoracic and prophylactic cranial irradiation has been shown to improve outcome in limited-stage SCLC and in subgroups of extensive-stage SCLC. Over the last decade, significant progress has been made in characterizing the SCLC tumor biology and its developmental pathways. Most recently, efforts have focused not only on molecular targets, but also on the development of novel drugs targeting tumor evolution and immune escape mechanisms; these approaches are promising and offer opportunities that may finally improve the outcomes of SCLC.

Prognostic Factor Analysis in Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Third-Line Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

There is little information on the clinical outcome of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with third-line chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to clarify the prognostic factors of SCLC patients receiving third-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 2001 and October 2011, 202 of 648 consecutive SCLC patients at the National Cancer Center Hospital East received third-line chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors for overall survival after third-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The demographics of the 202 patients were as follows: median age 66 years, 83% male, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0, 1, 2, and 3 values of 22, 122, 49, and 9, respectively. Median time to treatment failure after second-line chemotherapy (TTF2) was 4.5 months (TTF2 ≥ 5/< 5 months, 82/120). The median overall survival after third-line chemotherapy was 5.1 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that PS 0-1 (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.54; P < .001) and TTF2 ≥ 5 months (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.79; P < .001) were independent prognostic factors. TTF2 threshold of 5 months was determined on the basis of concordance probability adjusted by PS.

CONCLUSION

PS 0-1 and TTF2 ≥ 5 months were associated with a favorable prognosis among SCLC patients receiving third-line chemotherapy. These 2 factors might be helpful for the selection of candidates for third-line chemotherapy and for patient stratification when conducting future clinical trials in the third-line setting.

Weekly paclitaxel as metronomic palliative chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Topotecan is the standard second line agent used in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the erratic availability and the cost of the drug has been a prohibitive factor for its use in second-line setting in India. Paclitaxel has shown antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with SCLC. Hence, this audit was performed to study the efficacy of weekly paclitaxel as a form of metronomic therapy in the second-line setting in SCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients of relapsed SCLC who presented to the thoracic medical oncology unit of Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai between January 2011 and December 2015 were selected for this analysis. Weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) was administered until progression or development of intolerable side effects or patient refusal. Data regarding baseline demographics, previous treatment history, response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and toxicity to weekly paclitaxel was extracted from a prospectively maintained database in the thoracic medical oncology unit and was analyzed using SPSS version 16 (IBM, New York, USA). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Median age of the cohort was 58 years (40-77 years). Etoposide with carboplatin was the regimen used in 40 patients (70.2%) whereas the remaining 17 patients received etoposide with cisplatin (29.8%). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at relapse was 1 in 3 (5.3%), 2 in 49 (86.0%), and 3 in 5 (8.7%) patients. The response rate and clinical benefit rate were 9.1% (5 patients) and 52.7% (29 patients), respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were seen in 10.5% (6 patients). The median PFS was 145 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 116.6-173.5 days) whereas the median OS was 168 days (95% CI: 112.5-223.5 days).

CONCLUSION

Weekly paclitaxel as a second line agent in relapsed small cell cancer of the lung is a feasible and well-tolerated agent.

Cabazitaxel Versus Topotecan in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Progressive Disease During or After First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) typically respond well to initial chemotherapy. However, relapse invariably occurs, and topotecan, the only approved second-line treatment option, has limited efficacy. Taxanes have activity in SCLC, and cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane with potential for enhanced activity in chemorefractory malignancies.

METHODS

Patients with SCLC who relapsed after initial platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive cabazitaxel 25 mg/m every 21 days or topotecan 1.5 mg/m on days 1-5 every 21 days. Two patient subgroups, defined by chemosensitive and chemo-resistant/refractory disease, were assessed in combination and separately.

RESULTS

The safety profile of cabazitaxel and topotecan was consistent with previous studies, and despite considerable toxicity in both arms, no new safety concerns were identified. Patients receiving cabazitaxel had inferior progression-free survival compared with topotecan (1.4 versus 3.0 months, respectively; two-sided p < 0.0001; hazard ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval = 1.563-3.010), and results were similar in both the chemosensitive and chemorefractory subgroups. No complete responses were observed in either arm, and no partial responses were observed in the cabazitaxel group. The partial response rate in the topotecan arm was 10%. Median overall survival was 5.2 months in the cabazitaxel arm and 6.8 months in the topotecan arm (two-sided p = 0.0125; hazard ratio = 1.57, 95% confidence interval = 1.10-2.25).

CONCLUSION

Cabazitaxel, a next-generation taxane, had inferior efficacy when compared with standard-dose topotecan in the treatment of relapsed SCLC. Topotecan remains a suboptimal therapy, and continued efforts to develop improved second-line treatments are warranted.

Albumin-bound paclitaxel for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Since nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel exerts clinically meaningful antitumor effects on various malignancies, including breast, gastric and non-small-cell lung cancer, we hypothesized that treatment with nab-paclitaxel may also be beneficial for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We herein evaluated the safety and efficacy of weekly, single-agent nab-paclitaxel in patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC. Between May, 2013 and February, 2015, 9 patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC were treated with single-agent nab-paclitaxel at the Kyoto University Hospital. The medical records of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients had been previously treated with ≥2 lines of chemotherapy prior to receiving nab-paclitaxel. The median number of cycles of nab-paclitaxel was 2 (range, 1-4) and 3 partial responses were observed (response rate: 33%). The toxicity was generally mild and manageable: Grade 3/4 adverse events were only observed in 1 patient (grade 3 leukopenia). Thus, weekly administration of nab-paclitaxel may be a viable treatment option in patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC. Considering that treatment options are quite limited in this patient population, further evaluation of this regimen may prove valuable in the clinical setting.

Multitrial Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

We previously reported that progression-free survival (PFS) may be a candidate surrogate end point for overall survival (OS) in first-line extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) using data from three randomized trials (Foster, Cancer 2011). In this validation study (N0424-Alliance), we assessed the patient-level and trial-level surrogacy of PFS using data from seven new first-line phase II/III ES-SCLC trials and across all 10 trials as well (seven new, three previous).

METHODS

Individual patient data were utilized across the seven new trials (2259 patients) and all 10 trials (2855 patients). Patient-level surrogacy (Kendall's τ) was assessed using the Clayton copula bivariate survival model. Trial-level surrogacy was assessed through association of the log hazard ratios on OS and PFS across trials, including weighted (by trial size) least squares regression (WLS R²) of Cox model effects and correlation of the copula effects (copula R²). The minimum effect on the surrogate (MES) needed to detect a nonzero treatment effect on OS was also calculated.

RESULTS

The median OS and PFS across all 10 trials were 9.8 and 5.9 months, respectively. PFS showed strong surrogacy within the 7 new trials (copula R² = 0.90 [standard error = 0.27], WLS R² = 0.83 [95% confidence interval: 0.43, 0.95]; MES = 0.67, and Kendall's τ = 0.58) and across all 10 trials (copula R² = 0.81 [standard errors = 0.25], WLS R² = 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.91], MES = 0.70, and Kendall's τ = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

PFS demonstrated strong surrogacy for OS in first-line ES-SCLC based on this external validation study of individual patient data. PFS is a good alternative end point to OS and should be considered when resource constraints (time or patient) might make it useful or desirable in place of OS. Additional analyses are needed to assess its appropriateness for targeted agents in this disease setting.

Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is responsive to initial chemotherapy but becomes resistant to cytotoxic drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate what proportion of patients with SCLC had received the first- and further-line chemotherapy and which patients had benefited from chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with SCLC who had been treated with the best supportive care alone and the first-, second-, or third-line chemotherapy at the Osaka Police Hospital from June 2007 until March 2015.

RESULTS

Among 145 patients diagnosed with SCLC and eligible for analysis, 118 patients received chemotherapy. We added five patients who initiated the second-line chemotherapy during the study period at our institution. Sixty-five and 31 patients received the second- and third-line chemotherapies, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis detected age ≥75 years (odds ratio, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-7.75; P=0.047) and European Clinical Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 3-4 (14.3; 4.86-41.9; P<0.01) as factors disturbing the introduction of chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox hazard analyses also detected ECOG PS 2-4 (3.34; 2.00-5.58; P<0.01) as a factor decreasing overall survival after the first-line chemotherapy, and C-reactive protein level ≥1.0 mg/dL (2.67; 1.30-5.47; P<0.01) and progression-free survival after the first-line chemotherapy ≥6 months (2.85; 1.50-5.43; P<0.01) as factors influencing overall survival after the second-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Approximately two-thirds and one-third of the patients who receive chemotherapy proceed to the second- and third-line chemotherapies, respectively. Several factors, such as age, ECOG PS, C-reactive protein level, and progression-free survival after previous treatment may be useful when considering the introduction of further-line chemotherapy.

Targeted drugs in small-cell lung cancer

In contrast to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), few advances have been made in systemic treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in recent years. Most patients are diagnosed with extensive stage disease and are commonly treated with platinum-based chemotherapy which, although attaining high initial objective responses, has a limited impact on survival. Due to the dismal prognosis of SCLC, novel and more effective treatment strategies are urgently needed. A deeper characterization of the genomic landscape of SCLC has led to the development of rational and promising targeted agents. However, despite a large number of clinical trials, results have been disappointing and there are still no approved targeted drugs for SCLC. Recent comprehensive genomic studies suggest SCLC is a heterogeneous disease, characterized by genomic alterations targeting a broad variety of genes, including those involved in transcription regulation and chromatin modification which seem to be a hallmark of this specific lung cancer subtype. Current research efforts are focusing on further understanding of the cellular and molecular abnormalities underlying SCLC development, progression and resistance to chemotherapy. Unraveling the genomic complexity of SCLC could be the key to optimize existing treatments, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and for identifying those patients most likely to benefit from selected targeted therapeutic approaches.

Treatment for small cell lung cancer, where are we now?-a review

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents between 13% and 15% of all diagnosed lung cancers worldwide. It is an aggressive neoplasia, with a 5-year mortality of 90% or more. It has historically been classified as limited disease (LD) and extensive disease (ED) in most study protocols. The cornerstone of treatment for any stage of SCLC is etoposide-platinum based chemotherapy; in limited stage (LS), concomitant radiotherapy to thorax and mediastinum. Prophylactic radiotherapy to the central nervous system (CNS) [prophylactic cerebral irradiation (PCI)] has diminished the incidence of brain metastasis as the site for relapse in LD and ED patients, therefore it should be offered to patients with complete response to induction first-line treatment. Regarding second-line treatment, results are more modest and topotecan is accepted as treatment for this scenario offering a modest benefit.

New and emerging developments in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer therapeutics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains a disease with a dismal prognosis, with median survival of approximately 8-10 months. Despite many attempts to develop effective systemic therapies, very little progress has been made in the last several decades. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care in the first-line setting and is associated with high response rates albeit short-lived. However, there have been recent advances in the use of radiation therapy, as well as new insights into the biology of SCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some of the most appreciable advances in the last decade have involved the use of local radiation therapy. With the use of new laboratory techniques such as genomic sequencing, there remains promise of rationally targeted drug development. Circulating tumor cell research may also provide insights to SCLC biology and further refine treatment.

SUMMARY

Systemic therapy for SCLC has changed little over the past 30 years with the most significant advances in ES-SCLC relating to radiotherapy rather than systemic therapy. The effectiveness of prophylactic cranial irradiation and thoracic radiotherapy has renewed interest in therapeutics focused on the modulation of DNA damage or repair. Recent developments in genomic sequencing and immunotherapy may translate to new treatment paradigms for SCLC.

Small cell lung cancer: will recent progress lead to improved outcomes?

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine malignancy with a unique natural history characterized by a short doubling time, high growth fraction, and early development of widespread metastases. Although a chemotherapy- and radiation-sensitive disease, SCLC typically recurs rapidly after primary treatment, with only 6% of patients surviving 5 years from diagnosis. This disease has been notable for the absence of major improvements in its treatment: Nearly four decades after the introduction of a platinum-etoposide doublet, therapeutic options have remained virtually unchanged, with correspondingly little improvement in survival rates. Here, we summarize specific barriers and challenges inherent to SCLC research and care that have limited progress in novel therapeutic development to date. We discuss recent progress in basic and translational research, especially in the development of mouse models, which will provide insights into the patterns of metastasis and resistance in SCLC. Opportunities in clinical research aimed at exploiting SCLC biology are reviewed, with an emphasis on ongoing trials. SCLC has been described as a recalcitrant cancer, for which there is an urgent need for accelerated progress. The NCI convened a panel of laboratory and clinical investigators interested in SCLC with a goal of defining consensus recommendations to accelerate progress in the treatment of SCLC, which we summarize here.

Phase II study of bevacizumab plus irinotecan on the treatment of relapsed resistant small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II study investigates the efficacy and safety of DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan plus bevacizumab a monoclonal antibody against VEGF (BEVIRI) in patients with relapsed chemo-resistant SCLC.

METHODS

Patients who previously completed treatment with cisplatin-etoposide who relapsed within 3 months, had measurable extensive-stage SCLC, ECOG performance status 0-2 and adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, were given intravenous irinotecan 175 mg/m(2) plus intravenous bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 and 15 in 30 day cycles for a target of at least four cycles. No patients had received prophylactic intracranial irradiation. Treatment response was assessed with computer tomography scans with the completion of two consecutive cycles. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled and 28 of them were eligible for evaluation of response, toxicity and survival. The median age was 63.5 years (range 48-73). The ORR (CR and PR) was 25 % (95 % CI 8.9-41.0) and including patients with stable disease overall disease control rate at 2 months was 89 % (95 % CI 77.41-100). The median duration of response was 6 months, median progression-free survival was 3 months (mean PFS: 3.2, 95 % CI 2.7-3.7), and median overall survival was 6 months (mean OS: 6.3, 95 % CI 5.4-7.1). The PFS rate at 6 months was 3.6 %, and 1-year OS rate was 3.6 %. The median number of cycles received was 4.5 (range 1-6). There were two (7.1 %) hematologic (neutropenia) and one (3.5 %) non-hematologic (proteinuria) serious grades 3-4 adverse reactions without necessitating treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

BEVIRI combination in relapsed chemo-resistant SCLC patients demonstrates promising efficacy and low toxicity compared to historical controls. Further investigation is warranted.

Second-line therapy for small cell lung cancer: exploring the potential role of circulating tumor cells

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive and invasive variant of lung tumors. SCLC, especially in advanced stages, is distinguished by extremely high numbers of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in comparison to other malignancies. CTCs are operative in tumor spread and are currently enumerated to assess prognosis and response to cytotoxic therapy. Chemosensitivity of SCLC CTCs compared to primary tumors and metastases is not known.

METHODS

Establishment of two SCLC CTC cell lines, namely BHGc7 and BHGc10, allowed the in vitro characterization of their chemosensitivity to the second-line chemotherapeutics topotecan and epirubicin in comparison to a range of SCLC cell lines.

RESULTS

The SCLC CTC cell lines exhibited an approximately 7- and 12-fold increased chemosensitivity to epirubicin compared to topotecan, respectively, in in vitro cytotoxicity assays. In comparison to a panel of six SCLC cell lines, the two CTC lines showed a significantly higher chemosensitivity to epirubicin (range, 3- to 16-fold) and topotecan (range, 2.2- to 14.4-fold), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CTC cell lines derived from SCLC patients with recurrent disease exhibit high chemosensitivity to epirubicin vs. topotecan and show considerable more cytotoxicity in response to both compounds in comparison to a panel of SCLC cell lines. Thus, a decrease in the number of CTCs in response to second-line chemotherapy in SCLC patients may overestimate the effect on resident SCLC lesions and metastases.

Multimodality Therapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) occurs in only one third of patients with SCLC, but it is potentially curable. Combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy) has long been the mainstay of therapy for this condition, but more recent data suggest a role for surgery in early-stage disease. Prophylactic cranial irradiation seems to improve outcomes in patients who have responded to initial therapy. This review addresses the practical aspects of staging and treatment of patients with limited-stage SCLC.

Amrubicin for relapsed small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 803 patients

Currently, amrubicin is permitted for relapsed small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) only in Japan. The efficacy and adverse effects of amrubicin as reported by previous studies varied greatly. The inclusion criterion was a prospective study that was able to provide data for efficacy and safety by the AMR single agent regimen as second-line chemotherapy for a patient with SCLC. Binary data were meta-analyzed with the random-model generic inverse variance method. We included nine articles consisted of 803 patients. The pooled three-, six-, and nine-month progression-free survival were 63% (95% CI 57–69%, I² = 53%), 28% (95% CI 21–35%, I² = 71%), and 10% (95% CI 6–14%, I² = 41%), respectively. The pooled six-, 12-, and 18-month overall survival were 69% (95% CI 61–78%, I² = 83%), 36% (95% CI 28–44%, I² = 80%), and 15% (95% CI 8–21%, I² = 81%), respectively. Amrubicin seemed much more beneficial for Japanese patients. However, compared to the efficacy of topotecan presented in a previous meta-analysis, amrubicin may be a better treatment option than topotecan for both Japanese and Euro-American. Adverse effects by amrubicin were almost exclusively observed to be hematological. Notably, grade III/IV neutropenia incidence was 70% and febrile neutropenia incidence was 12%.

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive cancer of neuroendocrine origin, which is strongly associated with cigarette smoking. Patients typically present with a short duration of symptoms and frequently (60-65 %) with metastatic disease. SCLC is a heterogeneous disease including extremely chemosensitive and chemoresistant clones. For this reason, a high percentage of patients respond to first-line chemotherapy but rapidly succumb to the disease. SCLC is generally divided into two stages, limited and extensive. Standard treatment of limited stage disease includes combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide for four cycles, thoracic radiation initiated early with the first cycle of chemotherapy, and consideration of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in the subset of patients with good response. Surgery may play a role in TNM stages I and II. In extensive disease, platinum agents and etoposide, used in combination, are again the first-line standard of care in the USA. However, thoracic radiation therapy is used predominately in patients where local control is important and PCI is of uncertain benefit. Despite these treatments, prognosis remains poor and novel therapies are needed to improve survival in this disease.

Personalized Therapy of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma with distinct clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics. Despite robust responses to initial chemotherapy and radiation, the prognosis of patients with SCLC remains poor with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 10 %. Despite the fact that numerous molecularly targeted approaches have thus far failed to demonstrate clinical utility in SCLC, further advances will rely on better definition of the biological pathways that drive survival, proliferation and metastasis. Recent next-generation, molecular profiling studies have identified many new therapeutic targets in SCLC, as well as extreme genomic instability which explains the high degree of resistance. A wide variety of anti-angiogenic agents, growth factor inhibitors, pro-apoptotic agents, and epigenetic modulators have been evaluated in SCLC and many studies of these strategies are on-going. Perhaps the most promising approaches involve agents targeting cancer stem cell pathways and immunomodulatory drugs that interfere with the PD1 and CTLA-4 pathways. SCLC offers many barriers to the development of successful therapy, including limited tumor samples, inadequate preclinical models, high mutational burden, and aggressive tumor growth which impairs functional status and hampers enrollment on clinical trials.

Clinical impact of post-progression survival on overall survival in patients with limited-stage disease small cell lung cancer after first-line chemoradiotherapy

Background

The effects of first-line chemoradiotherapy on overall survival (OS) may be confounded by subsequent lines of therapy in patients with limited-stage disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationships between progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) and OS after first-line chemoradiotherapy in LD-SCLC patients.

Patients and methods.

We retrospectively analyzed 71 LD-SCLC patients with performance status (PS) 0–2 who received first-line chemoradiotherapy and had disease recurrence between September 2002 and March 2013 at Shizuoka Cancer Center (Shizuoka, Japan). We determined the correlation between PFS and OS and between PPS and OS at the individual level. In addition, we performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify significant prognostic factors of PPS.

Results

OS is more strongly correlated with PPS (Spearman’s r = 0.86, R² = 0.72, p < 0.05) than PFS (Spearman’s r = 0.46, R² = 0.38, p < 0.05). In addition, the response to second-line treatments, the presence of distant metastases at recurrence and the number of additional regimens after first-line chemoradiotherapy were significant independent prognostic factors for PPS.

Conclusions

PPS has more impact on OS than PFS in recurrent LD-SCLC patients with good PS at beginning of the treatment. Moreover, treatments administered after first-line chemoradiotherapy may affect their OS. However, larger multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.

[Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Therapeutic Regimens as Second-line Treatment for Small Cell Lung Cancer]

背景与目的

小细胞肺癌是一种侵袭性非常强的肿瘤，其主要治疗方案是细胞毒化疗，尽管有较高的初始治疗缓解率，但大部分患者在一线治疗后会出现复发或进展。目前只有较少的证据证明二线治疗能给复发或晚期小细胞肺癌患者带来生存获益，指南推荐药物较多，但临床多依据经验制定方案。本研究回顾性分析小细胞肺癌患者不同二线治疗方案的疗效和安全性，以指导临床医生更客观地选择小细胞肺癌二线治疗方案。

方法

回顾性分析了309例接受二线治疗的小细胞肺癌患者，其中157例患者进展后仅予最佳支持治疗，其余152例患者进行了二线化疗。采用Kaplan-Meier法生存曲线及Log-rank检验等统计学方法，观察终点为客观缓解率（objective response rate, ORR）、疾病控制率（disease control rate, DCR）、无进展生存时间（progression-free survival, PFS）、总生存时间（overall survival, OS）和安全性分析。

结果

接受二线化疗的患者较二线仅接受最佳支持治疗的患者生存获益明显，两组患者自一线治疗开始的OS分别为11.5个月和6.0个月（P < 0.001），并且前者无论何种复发类型，在二线治疗ORR、DCR、PFS和OS上均明显优于后者。接受二线化疗患者，其ORR为39.5%，DCR为59.2%，中位PFS和中位OS分别为3.3个月和5.3个月。据方案将二线化疗患者分组，敏感型复发患者由采用含VP-16方案的A组和采用含CPT-11方案的B1组组成，两组ORR分别为48.6%和35.3%，DCR分别为68.6%和58.8%，均无明显差异（P值分别为0.264和0.400）；两组二线中位PFS分别为4.0个月和3.0个月，无明显差异（P=0.432）；两组中位OS分别为6.5个月和4.5个月，无统计学差异（P=0.508）。耐药/难治型复发患者由其余含CPT-11方案的B2组、含PTX/DXL方案的C组和含TPT方案的D组组成。组间ORR、DCR、二线中位PFS无明显统计学差异（P值分别为0.521、0.528和0.775）；D组中位OS优于B2组和C组，差异具有统计学意义（P值分别为0.043、0.030）。四个方案组毒副作用相似，Ⅲ度-Ⅳ度血液学毒性组间并无差异；伊立替康组的患者腹泻发生率高于其他三组（P=0.029）。

结论

二线化疗可以给一线治疗失败的小细胞肺癌患者带来生存获益；不同二线化疗方案患者的近期缓解和无进展生存相似；耐药/难治型患者二线化疗采用含TPT的方案可能会给患者带来更好的总生存获益。

Meta-analysis of regression of advanced solid tumors in patients receiving placebo or no anti-cancer therapy in prospective trials

BACKGROUND

A meta-analysis of prospective trials systematically investigated regression of advanced solid tumors in patients receiving placebo or no anticancer therapy to inform on spontaneous regressions.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Arms of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of metastatic solid tumors receiving placebo or no anti-cancer therapy were used. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the overall response rate (ORR) and to detect differentials based on histology, progression at baseline and prior therapies.

RESULTS

A total of 7676 patients were evaluable from 61 RCTs evaluating 18 solid tumors. The ORR was 1.95% (95% CI: 1.52-2.48%). There was no significant effect of histology (p=0.110), baseline progressive disease (p>0.20) or the line of therapy (p>0.20) on ORR.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous regressions are seen across all advanced solid tumors. Some malignancies demonstrated higher rates of spontaneous regressions and may be relatively immunotherapy responsive.

Topotecan for Relapsed Small-cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1347 Patients

Topotecan is the most reliable chemotherapy regimen for relapsed small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). The efficacy and adverse effects of topotecan as reported by previous studies varied greatly. The inclusion criterion was a prospective study that was able to provide data for 6-month over-all survival (OS) rate, 1-year OS rate, objective responses, and/or adverse effects of single agent topotecan as a second line chemotherapy for SCLC, written in English language as a full article. Any topotecan regimen were allowed. Binary data were meta-analyzed with the random-model generic inverse variance method. We included 14 articles consisted of 1347 patients. Pooled values were estimated as follows. Six-month OS rate: 37% (95% CI: 28-46%). One-year OS rate: 9% (95% CI: 5-13%). Response rate: 5% (95% CI: 1-8%). Six-month OS rate: 57% (95% CI: 50-64%). One-year OS rate: 27% (95% CI: 22-32%). Response rate: 17% (95% CI: 11-23%). Grade III/IV neutropenia 69% (95% CI: 58-80%). Grade III/IV thrombopenia 41% (95% CI: 34-48%). Grade III/IV anemia 24% (95% CI: 17-30%). Non-hematorogical events were rare. Chemotherapy-related death 2% (95% CI: 1-3%). In conclusion, Topotecan provided a possibly promising outcome for sensitive-relapse SCLC and poor outcome for refractory relapse SCLC. Adverse events were mainly hematological.

VAC chemotherapy with valproic acid for refractory/relapsing small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

Salvage chemotherapy (CT) for relapsing or refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains disappointing. In vitro experiments showed that valproic acid increases apoptosis of SCLC cell lines exposed to doxorubicin, vindesine and bis(2-chloroethyl)amine. The primary objective of this phase II study was to determine whether epigenetic modulation with valproic acid in addition to a doxorubicin, vindesine and cyclophosphamide (VAC) regimen improves 6-month progression-free survival (PFS).

Patients with pathologically proven SCLC refractory to prior platinum derivatives and etoposide were eligible. After central registration, patients received VAC plus daily oral valproic acid.

64 patients were registered, of whom six were ineligible. Seven patients did not receive any CT, leaving 51 patients assessable for the primary end-point. The objective response rate was 19.6%. Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.5–3.6 months) and 6-month PFS was 6%. Median survival time was 5.9 months (95% CI 4.7–7.5 months). Toxicity was mainly haematological, with 88% and 26% grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombopenia, respectively.

Despite an interesting response rate, the addition of valproic acid to VAC did not translate into adequate PFS in relapsing SCLC or SCLC refractory to platinum–etoposide.

Epigenetic modulation with valproic acid does not improve CT efficacy in refractory SCLC after platinum–etoposidehttp://ow.ly/R0rBt

Trends, predictors, and impact of systemic chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer patients between 1985 and 2005

BACKGROUND

The last 3 decades have witnessed limited therapeutic advances in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) management. This study evaluated real-world trends in the use of systemic therapies and the impact on patient outcomes in the United States.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to find patients diagnosed with SCLC between 1985 and 2005. The 1985-1990 period served as the baseline for a temporal analysis conducted at 5-year intervals (1985-1990, 1991-1995, 1996-2000, and 2001-2005). Cox proportional models were used to estimate the effect of chemotherapy on survival. Results were validated with a propensity-matched analysis.

RESULTS

There were 47,351 eligible patients: 52% were male; the median age was 71 years; and 87% were white, 7% were black, and 1.4% were Asian. The proportion of patients treated with chemotherapy was low but increased over time (38%, 55%, 50%, and 53%; P < .001). Race, diagnosis period, age, stage, and location of residence significantly predicted chemotherapy use. Females (51%), Asians (53%), and rural residents (60%) were more likely to receive chemotherapy. The median overall survival with and without chemotherapy was 9.6 and 3.6 months, respectively. Linear trend analyses showed a modest reduction in the impact of chemotherapy on survival for patients treated with chemotherapy versus untreated patients (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.59, 0.61, 0.64, and 0.62; P < .001) but an overall trend of improved survival for treated (HRs, 1.0, 1.03, 1.00, and 0.96; P = .005) and untreated patients (HRs, 1.0, 0.99, 0.94, and 0.92; P < .001). There was no survival difference between patients treated with carboplatin and patients treated with cisplatin (HR, 0.99; confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.19; P = .875). Additional therapy beyond platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with a survival benefit (HR, 0.78; CI, 0.75-0.81; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy use was associated with a survival benefit in Medicare patients with SCLC treated in a real-world setting.

Chemotherapeutic Response and Prognosis among Lung Cancer Patients with and without Depression

Purpose: The current study examined quality of life, progression of disease, and survival rate during chemotherapy in newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with depression (n=48) and without depression (n=78). Further, the study explored the hypothesis that the survival benefit resulted from the chemotherapy of docetaxel and cisplatin (the DC regimen).

Patients and Methods: In total, 126 patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC participated in a cross-sectional study of DC chemotherapy integrated with standard oncology care in depression and non-depression groups. The health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) was assessed using the quality of life questionnaire for Chinese cancer patients receiving chemobiotherapy (QLQ-CCC). Depression was self-rated using the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (Z-SDS). Both HR-QOL and Z-SDS were completed before the first and after the last cycle of chemotherapy. Association between depression and quality of life, treatment responses, adverse effects and survival rate was considered positive at the significance level of p<0.05. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient, t-test and other statistical analysis were performed using the SPSS software version 13.0 for Windows.

Results: In total, 126 lung cancer patients were evaluated, 38% had a diagnosis of depression. The presence of depression was associated with reduced quality of life, increased progression of disease, nausea and fatigue and reduced survival rate by nearly 90 days on follow-up. Therefore, depression significantly predicted worse survival (P=0.009).In addition, the chemotherapy DC regimen did not appear to improve the quality of life in depressed patients (SDS 94.96±18.14 before chemotherapy vs. SDS 100.04±16.61 after therapy, P=0.155). In a secondary analysis, there was a positive relationship between depression and nausea and fatigue but there was no significant difference in hematologic toxicities between the depression and non-depression groups.

Conclusion: Depression was associated with worse survival in patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC. Also, the chemotherapy DC regimen did not improve quality of life in depressed patients and the data do not support the hypothesis that treatment responses of NSCLC patients with depression mediated the observed survival benefit from the DC regimen. There were more cases of progressed disease in the depressed group. Findings suggest that NSCLC patients with depression are at increased risk for decline in HR-QOL and survival rate during chemotherapy than patients without depression.

Second-Line Therapy of Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Topotecan Compared to a Combination Treatment with Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide And Vincristine (ACO) - a Single Center Experience

Background: Randomized trials established topotecan and the combination of adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and vincristine (ACO) as second-line therapy options for small-cell lung cancer. We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of SCLC patients undergoing second-line chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods: 92 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of SCLC between 2000 and 2010 were analyzed.

Results: 86 patients (93.5%) were evaluable for outcome analysis. All patients diagnosed with limited disease (LD) SCLC received platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. 69 patients (98.6%) diagnosed with extensive disease (ED) SCLC received first-line palliative chemotherapy. In the total cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 10.3 months (19.2 months and 9.2 months for LD-SCLC and ED-SCLC, respectively). 42 patients received second-line therapy (ACO in 47.6% and topotecan in 31.0% of patients, respectively). Eight patients (19.0%) were re-challenged with platinum/etoposide. Neither the overall response rate (52.9% vs. 22.2%; p=0.128) nor progression-free survival (2.4 vs. 2.4 months; p=0.794) or OS (5.5 vs. 5.0 months; p=0.997) were significantly different between ACO and topotecan. ACO-treated patients showed a trend towards a longer duration of inpatient care.

Conclusion: We showed similar outcomes as reported in clinical trials. Second-line combination chemotherapy with ACO did not show superiority to intravenous topotecan, but was associated with a clinically relevant longer hospitalization time.

Phase I and pharmacological study of pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of oral topotecan in combination with pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Methods:

Stage I of this study was to determine whether there was an impact of pazopanib on topotecan exposure. In stage II, the MTD and safety profile of oral topotecan given weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle; or daily-times-five on days 1–5 in a 21-day cycle, both in combination with daily pazopanib, were explored.

Results:

In total, 67 patients were enroled. Pazopanib co-administration caused a substantial increase in exposure to total topotecan (1.7-fold) compared with topotecan alone, which is considered clinically relevant. Topotecan had no effect on pazopanib concentrations. Safety findings were consistent with the known profile of both agents. There were three drug-related deaths, liver failure, tumour haemorrhage and myelosuppression. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; hand–foot syndrome, myelosuppression and diarrhoea) on the weekly topotecan schedule and four patients experienced DLTs (myelosuppression) on the daily-times-five topotecan schedule. When combined with pazopanib, 800 mg daily, the recommended doses for oral topotecan are: 8 mg weekly and 2.5 mg daily-times-five. Seven of eight patients with partial response had platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. In addition, 54% of patients had stable disease with 22% stable for 6 months.

Conclusions:

Total topotecan exposure is 1.7-fold higher when co-administered with pazopanib. Both schedules of administration were tolerated and would permit further evaluation, especially the weekly schedule.

Smoking, inflammation and small cell lung cancer: recent developments

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15 % of all lung tumors and represents an invasive neuroendocrine malignancy with poor survival rates. This cancer is highly prevalent in smokers and characterized by inactivation of p53 and retinoblastoma. First in vitro expansion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of SCLC patients allowed for investigation of the cell biology of tumor dissemination. In the suggested CTC SCLC model, the primary tumor attracts and educates tumor-promoting and immunosuppressive macrophages which in turn arm CTCs to spread and generate distal lesions. Preexisting inflammatory processes associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) seem to potentiate the subsequent activity of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM). Activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and expression of chitinase-3-like 1/YKL-40 in SCLC CTCs seems to be associated with drug resistance. In conclusion, inflammation-associated generation of invasive and chemoresistant CTCs most likely explains the characteristic features of SCLC, namely early dissemination and rapid failure of chemotherapy.

Best supportive care in clinical trials: review of the inconsistency in control arm design

Background:

Best supportive care (BSC) as a control arm in clinical trials is poorly defined. We conducted a review to evaluate clinical trials' concordance with published, consensus-based framework for BSC delivery in trials.

Methods:

A consensus-based Delphi panel previously identified four key domains of BSC delivery in trials: multidisciplinary care; supportive care documentation; symptom assessment; and symptom management. We reviewed trials including BSC control arms from 2002 to 2014 to assess concordance to BSC standards and to selected items from the CONSORT 2010 guidelines.

Results:

Of 408 articles retrieved, we retained 18 after applying exclusion criteria. Overall, trials conformed to the CONSORT guidelines better than the BSC standards (28% vs 16%). One-third of articles offered a detailed description of BSC, 61% reported regular symptom assessment, and 44% reported using validated symptom assessment measures. One-third reported symptom assessment at identical intervals in both arms. None documented evidence-based symptom management. No studies reported educating patients about symptom management or goals of therapy. No studies reported offering access to palliative care specialists.

Conclusions:

Reporting of BSC in trials is incomplete, resulting in uncertain internal and external validity. Such studies risk systematically over-estimating the net clinical effect of the comparator arms.