Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stages I-IIIA resectable non small-cell lung cancer guideline

Nanoparticle migration and delivery of Paclitaxel to regional lymph nodes in a large animal model

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of migration and in situ chemotherapy delivery to regional lymph nodes (LN) in a large animal model using an expansile polymer nanoparticle (eNP) delivery system.

STUDY DESIGN

Dual-labeled 50-nm and 100-nm eNP were prepared by encapsulating an IR-813 near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent dye within coumarin-conjugated expansile polymer nanoparticles (NIR-C-eNP). NIR imaging and fluorescent microscopy were used to identify intralymphatic migration of NIR-nanoparticles to draining inguinal or mesenteric LN after injection in swine hind legs or intestine. Nanoparticle-mediated intranodal delivery of chemotherapy was subsequently assessed with Oregon Green paclitaxel-loaded NIR-eNP (NIR-OGpax-eNP).

RESULTS

NIR imaging demonstrated direct lymphatic migration of 50-nm, but not 100-nm, NIR-C-eNP and NIR-OGpax-eNP to the draining regional LNs after intradermal injection in the hind leg or subserosal injection in intestine. Fluorescent microscopy demonstrated that IR-813 used for NIR real-time trafficking colocalized with both the coumarin-labeled polymer and paclitaxel chemotherapy and was identified within the subcapsular spaces of the draining LNs. These studies verify nodal migration of both nanoparticle and encapsulated payload, and confirm the feasibility of focusing chemotherapy delivery directly to regional nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Regionally-targeted intranodal chemotherapy can be delivered to draining LNs for both skin and solid organs using 50-nm paclitaxel-loaded eNP.

Role of adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC (stages I to III)

Complete surgical resection is the main therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Survival rates remain, at best, 80% for stage IA, necessitating the development of effective systemic therapy. Several large randomized control trials and meta-analyses provide evidence for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I to III, and are the basis for the standards of care. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens have shown 4% to 15% survival advantage at 5 years. Given this modest survival benefit, research is focused on the identification of prognostic and predictive markers to aid in the selection of appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

The prognostic factors of resected non-small cell lung cancer with chest wall invasion

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients with a surgically resected NSCLC invading chest wall in order to identify prognostic factors that impact long term survival.

METHODS

Between January 1990 and December 2009, 107 patients who underwent surgical resection for chest wall invading NSCLC were reviewed. Tumors invading only the parietal pleura were defined as superficial invasions, and those involving the soft tissue or ribs were defined as deep invasions.

RESULTS

There were 91 men and 16 women; median age was 64 years (range 30 to 80 years). Overall 5 year survival rate was 26.3%. The univariate prognostic factors for survival included gender, extent of resection (pneumonectomy vs lobectomy), tumor size(> 5 cm vs ≤ 5 cm), nodal status (N0 or N1 vs N2), completeness of resection (complete vs incomplete) and completeness of adjuvant chemotherapy. At multivariate analysis, five independent prognostic factors were shown; depth of invasion (superficial vs deep), tumor size, nodal status, completeness of resection, and completeness of adjuvant chemotherapy. In patients with completely resected T3N0 NSCLC, completion of chemotherapy is the only prognostic factor for long term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Completeness of resection, nodal status, depth of invasion, tumor size, and adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors for long-term survival in NSCLC patients with chest wall invasion. Because of poor prognosis in cases with chest wall invasion that have N2 positive LN, that is difficult to achieve complete resection and that need pneumonectomy, definite chemoradiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be considered first in these cases.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non-small-cell lung cancer: future perspectives for clinical research

Adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is a debated issue in clinical oncology. Although it is considered a standard for resected stage II-IIIA patients according to the available guidelines, many questions are still open. Among them, it should be acknowledged that the treatment for stage IB disease has shown so far a limited (if sizable) efficacy, the role of modern radiotherapies requires to be evaluated in large prospective randomized trials and the relative impact of age and comorbidities should be weighted to assess the reliability of the trials' evidences in the context of the everyday-practice. In addition, a conclusive evidence of the best partner for cisplatin is currently awaited as well as a deeper investigation of the fading effect of chemotherapy over time. The limited survival benefit since first studies were published and the lack of reliable prognostic and predictive factors beyond pathological stage, strongly call for the identification of bio-molecular markers and classifiers to identify which patients should be treated and which drugs should be used. Given the disappointing results of targeted therapy in this setting have obscured the initial promising perspectives, a biomarker-selection approach may represent the basis of future trials exploring adjuvant treatment for resected NSCLC.

[Multivariate survival analysis of patients with stage I NSCLC]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in providing survival advantage for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially those with stage Ib NSCLC, remains to be determined. The seventh edition of the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) Classification of Malignant Tumors is due to be published in 2009. The aim of the current study is to validate the value of this classification in Chinese early-stage NSCLC. The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with early-stage NSCLC were also assessed.

METHODS

The new staging project was validated in 433 patients who underwent complete surgical resection for early-stage NSCLC at the Single Institution of Shanghai Chest Hospital from June 1998 to June 2010. This new parameter was combined with other well-established prognostic factors, and multivariate survival analysis were performed. Variables in the analysis included age, gender, history of smoking, pathologic type, type of resection (pneumonectomy, lobectomy, bilobectomy, and sleeve resection), tumor size (largest tumor dimension), T-status, lymphovascular vessel invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The three-year overall survival rates for females and males are 89.22% and 77.53%, respectively (P=0.001,8). Elder patients have worse prognoses: the survival rates for those aged ≥70 and <70 are 70.64% and 85.85%, respectively (P=0.000,1). The three-year overall survival rates of patients whose tumors measured no larger than 2 cm in biggest diameter or larger than 2 cm but no larger than 3 cm are 95.15% and 85.71%, respectively. For those with tumors larger than 3 cm but smaller than 5 cm or larger than 5 cm but smaller than 7 cm, the survival rates are 74.80% and 60.47%, respectively (P<0.000,1). Multivariate analysis reveals that age, gender, vascular vessel invasion, pathologic type, and visceral pleural involvement are significant predictive factors of the overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor size and pathologic type are significant independent prognostic factors in stage I NSCLC. The survival rates of patients with adenocarcinoma are higher than those of patients with other types of NSCLC. Female patients and those without a history of smoking have a better outcome. Results suggest that patients with the Ib stage of the disease can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic and predictive value of a malignancy-risk gene signature in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The malignancy-risk gene signature is composed of numerous proliferative genes and has been applied to predict breast cancer risk. We hypothesized that the malignancy-risk gene signature has prognostic and predictive value for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

The ability of the malignancy-risk gene signature to predict overall survival (OS) of early-stage NSCLC patients was tested using a large NSCLC microarray dataset from the Director's Challenge Consortium (n = 442) and two independent NSCLC microarray datasets (n = 117 and 133, for the GSE13213 and GSE14814 datasets, respectively). An overall malignancy-risk score was generated by principal component analysis to determine the prognostic and predictive value of the signature. An interaction model was used to investigate a statistically significant interaction between adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and the gene signature. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The malignancy-risk gene signature was statistically significantly associated with OS (P < .001) of NSCLC patients. Validation with the two independent datasets demonstrated that the malignancy-risk score had prognostic and predictive values: Of patients who did not receive ACT, those with a low malignancy-risk score had increased OS compared with a high malignancy-risk score (P = .007 and .01 for the GSE13212 and GSE14814 datasets, respectively), indicating a prognostic value; and in the GSE14814 dataset, patients receiving ACT survived longer in the high malignancy-risk score group (P = .03), and a statistically significant interaction between ACT and the signature was observed (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The malignancy-risk gene signature was associated with OS and was a prognostic and predictive indicator. The malignancy-risk gene signature could be useful to improve prediction of OS and to identify those NSCLC patients who will benefit from ACT.

Patterns of care for non-small-cell lung cancer at an academic institution affiliated with a national cancer institute-designated cancer center

PURPOSE

Evidence-based treatment guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exist to improve the quality of care for patients with this disease. However, how often evidence-based decisions are used for care of NSCLC is poorly understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined patterns of care and rate of adherence to evidence-based guidelines for 185 new NSCLC patients seen between 2007 and 2009. Evidence-based care status was determined for 150 patients.

RESULTS

Eighty-one percent of the patients were white, the mean age was 66 years, 49% were women, 11% were never smokers, 83% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1, 49.7% of tumors were adenocarcinomas, 57.1% of never smokers had tumors genotyped (EGFR, ALK, KRAS), and 13.3% participated in clinical trials. The rate of evidence-based treatment adherence was 94.1% (16 of 17), 100% (21 of 21) and 100% (36 of 36) in patients with stages I, II, and III NSCLC, respectively. Stage IV disease, with adherence of 76.3% (58 of 76), was correlated with a higher rate of nonadherence when compared with stages I-III (odds ratio 16.33; 95% CI, 1.94 to 137.73). In patients with stage IV disease, the rate of evidence-based adherence was 95% (72 of 76) for first-line therapy, 95.2% (40 of 42) for second-line therapy, and only 33.3% (6 of 18) for third-line therapy (P < .001). There was no significant correlation between evidence-based adherence status and the patient's age, sex, performance status, smoking history, ethnicity, or the treating physician.

CONCLUSION

These data point toward the need for improved evidence-based use of resources in the third-line setting of stage IV NSCLC.

A decade of advances in treatment of early-stage lung cancer

Emerging from the past decade, there has been a diversification of options for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is now more widely performed, with oncologic outcomes equivalent to those with open thoracotomy. Although lobectomy remains the standard approach to surgical resection, lesser resections, such as segmentectomy and wedge resection, are considerations for some patients. Advances in surgical, radiation, and medical therapies continue to evolve. Future research questions will focus on comparing long-term outcomes with these modalities, including survival, as well as patient-centered endpoints, such as quality of life.

Survival and risk of adverse events in older patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stages II-IIIA lung cancer: observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the survival and risk of serious adverse events in older patients with stages II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer treated with or without postoperative platinum based chemotherapy.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Cases of lung cancer in Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry linked to Medicare files, 1992-2005, and follow-up data to December 2007.

PARTICIPANTS

3324 patients aged more than 65 years with resected stages II-IIIA lung cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was overall survival and secondary outcome was the rate of serious adverse events among older patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 21% (n = 684) of patients received platinum based chemotherapy. Analyses adjusted, stratified, or matched by propensity scores showed that chemotherapy was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio range 0.78-0.81). The beneficial effect of chemotherapy was also observed among patients treated with radiation therapy (0.75-0.77) or without radiation therapy (0.74-0.77); however, chemotherapy was not beneficial for patients aged 80 or more (1.32-1.46). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an increased odds of serious adverse events (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Platinum based adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with reduced mortality and increased risk of serious adverse events in older patients with stages II-IIIA lung cancer. The magnitude of the benefit is similar to that observed in randomised controlled trials carried out among selected patients.

Prognostic potential of FOXP3 expression in non-small cell lung cancer cells combined with tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells

Expression of the transcription factor FOXP3 characterizes regulatory T cells (Tregs) that engage in the maintenance of immunological self-tolerance and immune homeostasis. Intra-tumoral accumulation of Tregs is associated with unfavorable prognosis in several kinds of cancers. Recently, expression of FOXP3 and its association with prognosis have also been shown in some cancer cells in clinical studies. For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, prognostic significance of tumor FOXP3 expression and its relationship with Tregs remain unknown. FOXP3 expression in cancer cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was examined by immunohistochemical staining of surgical specimens from 87 patients with NSCLC. Prognostic values of the tumor-infiltrating Treg count and tumor FOXP3 expression status were evaluated retrospectively. FOXP3-positive cancer cells were observed in 27 of 87 (31.0%) patients. There was no significant relationship between Treg count and tumor FOXP3 status. Increased Treg counts were associated with worse overall and relapse-free survival whereas the influence of tumor FOXP3 status on survival was not significant. However, when FOXP3-positive cancer cells were present, the relationship between Treg accumulation and worse prognosis was attenuated. In contrast, patients without tumor FOXP3 expression and high Treg count had significantly worse overall and relapse-free survival (hazard ratio: 3.118 and 3.325, p=0.028 and 0.024, respectively) than other groups. These results suggest that tumor FOXP3 expression has a better prognostic potential in NSCLC and that in combination with tumor-infiltrating Treg count the absence of tumor FOXP3 allows the selection of high-risk patients.

Are we treating enough elderly patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer?

Despite the fact that non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is very common in the older population, these patients are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials evaluating new anti-cancer agents, and thus it is difficult to reach evidence-based recommendations for this special population. The purpose of the present paper is to present the currently available evidence regarding treatment of early-stages of NSCLC in older patients. Although, age is still considered as a negative factor influencing treatment decisions and curative cancer-directed surgery is often omitted in the older population several studies support that surgical resection is feasible in the older patient and that age per se is not a contraindication for various surgical procedures. Pneumonectomy is associated with a higher mortality in the older population and this issue should be taken into account when deciding whether a patient is suitable for pneumonectomy. Older patients should be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection although little information is available regarding the real benefit and tolerability of these regimens for patients over 75 years of age. Given the lack of demonstrated benefit for the use of adjuvant RT it is also not recommended in older population.

Emerging treatment options in the management of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer (LC) has become the leading cancer-related cause of death in the US and in developed European countries in the last decade. Its incidence is still growing in females and in smokers. Surgery remains the treatment of choice whenever feasible, but unfortunately, many patients have an advanced LC at presentation and one-third of potentially operable patients do not receive a tumor resection because of their low compliance for intervention due to their compromised cardiopulmonary functions and other comorbidities. For these patients the alternative therapeutic options are stereotactic radiotherapy or percutaneous radiofrequency. When surgery is planned, an anatomical resection (segmentectomy, lobectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy, sleeve lobectomy) is usually performed; wedge resection (considered as a nonanatomical one) is generally the accepted option for unfit patients. The recent increase in discovering small and peripheral LCs and/or ground-glass opacities with screening programs has dramatically increased surgeons' interest in limited resections. The role of these resections is discussed. Also, recent improvements in molecular biology techniques have increased the chemotherapic options for neoadjuvant LC treatment. The role and the importance of targeted chemotherapy is also discussed.

Managing treatment-related adverse events associated with egfr tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) has the highest prevalence of all types of lung cancer, which is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Canada. The need for more effective and less toxic treatment options for nsclc has led to the development of agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr)-mediated signalling pathway, such as egfr tyrosine kinase inhibitors (egfr-tkis). Although egfr-tkis are less toxic than traditional anti-neoplastic agents, they are commonly associated with acneiform-like rash and diarrhea. This review summarizes the clinical presentation and causes of egfr-tki-induced rash and diarrhea, and presents strategies for effective assessment, monitoring, and treatment of these adverse effects. Strategies to improve the management of egfr-tki-related adverse events should improve clinical outcomes, compliance, and quality of life in patients with advanced nsclc.

Genomic medicine in non-small cell lung cancer: paving the path to personalized care

Lung cancer is the commonest cause of cancer-related mortality and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of all lung cancer. The prognosis of NSCLC remains poor across all stages, despite advances in staging techniques and treatments. The findings of recent high-throughput mRNA microarray studies have shown potential in refining current NSCLC diagnosis, classification, prognosis and treatment paradigms. Emerging microarray studies of microRNA, DNA copy number and methylation profiles are also providing novel insights into the biology of NSCLC. Currently there are several challenges, such as the reproducibility and cost of microarray platforms that will need to be addressed prior to the implementation of these genomic technologies to routine thoracic oncology practice. In addition, genomic tests (such as prognosis and prediction gene expression signatures) will need to be validated in well designed prospective studies that aim to answer clinically relevant questions. If successful, the integration of microarray-based genomic information with existing clinicopathological models may enhance the ability of clinicians to match the most effective treatment to an individual patient. Such a strategy may improve survival and reduce treatment-related morbidity in NSCLC patients.

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy for resected NSCLC: one size fits all?

The standard of care for resected stage II - IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer includes adjuvant chemotherapy based on the results of randomized trials using cisplatin regimens. A recent meta-analysis (Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation) showed no survival benefit for this modality in stage IB disease. Therefore, the role for stage IB disease remains controversial. The Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation meta-analysis, which is based on pooled data of five randomized trials, has shown a 5.3% absolute survival benefit at 5 years. However, long-term results of the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial evaluating adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer indicated a possible late adjuvant chemotherapy-related over-mortality. Tumor stage currently is the benchmark standard use for identifying patients who would benefit from adjuvant treatment. In the knowledge of late adjuvant chemotherapy-related over-mortality it is therefore critical to identify subsets of patients who would or would never benefit from adjuvant cisplatin. This review will discuss the extent to which individualized adjuvant treatment can be provided.

Combination of low vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A)/VEGF receptor 2 expression and high lymphocyte infiltration is a strong and independent favorable prognostic factor in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

There seems to be a close interplay between angiogenesis and the immune system. The authors of this report investigated the prognostic role of angiogenic markers in coexpression with immune system markers in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Tumor resection samples from 335 patients with stage I to IIIA NSCLC were obtained, and tissue microarrays were constructed. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A (VEGF-A), VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), and lymphocytes that were positive for the cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) and CD8 coreceptors.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, 5-year survival rates were 87% for the combination of low tumor cell expression of VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 (↓VEGF-A/↓VEGFR-2) and high tumor cell expression of CD4 and CD8 (↑CD4/↑CD8) (n = 19), 58% for mixed combinations (n = 290), and 27% for the ↑VEGF-A/↑VEGFR-2 and ↓CD4/↓CD8 combination (n = 26). In multivariate analysis, the coexpression of ↑VEGF-A/↑VEGFR-2 and ↓CD4/↓CD8 was an independent negative prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 9.16; 95% confidence interval, 2.11-39.8; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Low tumor cell VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 expression in combination with high adaptive immune cell expression in the tumor-related stroma had a strong and independent favorable prognostic impact in patients with NSCLC.

Comparison of the quality of life between patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and healthy controls

PURPOSE

We explored covariates of the quality of life (QOL) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and made a comparison with healthy controls.

METHODS

We assessed the QOL of 220 consecutive NSCLC patients at a university hospital. The QOL data were measured by the brief version of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life and by utility using the standard gamble method. We selected demographically matched healthy controls from the 2001 National Health Interview Survey for comparison. Multiple linear regression models were constructed to explore significant factors of QOL after controlling for covariates.

RESULTS

Patients with more advanced stages of NSCLC had poorer scores than did the healthy controls in the physical and psychological domains. Patients with disease duration of longer than 1 year tended to report higher physical and environment QOL than did those with NSCLC diagnosed for less than 1 year. Insight into one's own illness was associated with a higher utility, better social support, and improved financial resources.

CONCLUSIONS

QOL was significantly associated with staging and duration of NSCLC. Disease insight appears to be a positive factor for operable NSCLC patients of the Taiwanese culture, which implies that clinicians should respect patient autonomy in diagnosis disclosure.

Reflex testing of resected stage I through III lung adenocarcinomas for EGFR and KRAS mutation: report on initial experience and clinical utility at a single center

OBJECTIVE

The genes KRAS and EGFR have emerged as potential targets for therapy in lung adenocarcinoma; mutations in these genes can be found in almost half of patients. In anticipation of the clinical importance of molecularly defined adenocarcinoma subgroups for the treatment of patients with resected stages I through III lung adenocarcinoma, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Departments of Surgery and Pathology have collaborated since 2006 to conduct reflex testing of tumor specimens for EGFR and KRAS mutations.

METHODS

Using established methods, the identification of EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations was performed. In samples lacking these 2 sensitizing EGFR mutations, KRAS analysis was done.

RESULTS

We studied a total of 1831 patients who had stage I through IV lung adenocarcinomas and detected 448 KRAS and 364 EGFR mutations. Of these patients, a subset of 855 (78%) patients with stages I through III adenocarcinoma of the lung who underwent curative surgical resection at MSKCC were tested. In patients with early stage disease, 158 EGFR mutations and 207 KRAS mutations were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the first 3 years of reflex testing at MSKCC reported here demonstrate the feasibility, clinical utility, and potential of this approach. This information allowed for enrollment of patients into clinical trials to explore mutation-specific, directed therapy and led to retrospective studies related to patient outcome. In addition, it may inform selection of chemotherapy for recurrent disease and may help to distinguish multiple primary tumors from metastatic disease.

Annual review of advances in lung cancer clinical research: a report for the year 2009

The use of positron emission tomography compared with conventional staging increases the detection of extrathoracic metastases and reduces the number futile thoracotomies in patients being evaluated for surgical resection. Long-term follow-up of one of the two adjuvant chemotherapy trials revealed a continued overall survival (OS) benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy. In locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, a phase III trial of chemoradiotherapy alone and with surgical resection revealed no statistically significant difference in OS between the treatment arms. In advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer, a phase III trial compared gefitinib with carboplatin and paclitaxel in a clinically enriched patient population for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK) mutations; among patients with an EGFR TK mutation, patients in gefitinib arm compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel arm experienced a statistically significant superior response rate and progression-free survival, and among patients without EGFR TK mutation patients in the gefitinib arm compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel experienced a statistically significant inferior response rate and progression-free survival. A phase III trial of platinum-based therapy with and without cetuximab in the first-line setting revealed improved OS in the cetuximab arm. A phase III trial of maintenance pemetrexed compared with placebo in patients who had not progressed after initial platinum-based therapy revealed an improvement in OS of patients in the pemetrexed arm with nonsquamous histology. In limited-stage small cell lung cancer, a phase III trial compared standard and high-dose prophylactic cranial irradiation and revealed no significant difference in the rate of brain metastases between the two treatment arms.

Prognostic and predictive gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The JBR.10 trial demonstrated benefit from adjuvant cisplatin/vinorelbine (ACT) in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that expression profiling may identify stage-independent subgroups who might benefit from ACT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gene expression profiling was conducted on mRNA from 133 frozen JBR.10 tumor samples (62 observation [OBS], 71 ACT). The minimum gene set that was selected for the greatest separation of good and poor prognosis patient subgroups in OBS patients was identified. The prognostic value of this gene signature was tested in four independent published microarray data sets and by quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

RESULTS

A 15-gene signature separated OBS patients into high-risk and low-risk subgroups with significantly different survival (hazard ratio [HR], 15.02; 95% CI, 5.12 to 44.04; P < .001; stage I HR, 13.31; P < .001; stage II HR, 13.47; P < .001). The prognostic effect was verified in the same 62 OBS patients where gene expression was assessed by qPCR. Furthermore, it was validated consistently in four separate microarray data sets (total 356 stage IB to II patients without adjuvant treatment) and additional JBR.10 OBS patients by qPCR (n = 19). The signature was also predictive of improved survival after ACT in JBR.10 high-risk patients (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.63; P = .0005), but not in low-risk patients (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.22 to 11.06; P = .0133; interaction P < .001). Significant interaction between risk groups and ACT was verified by qPCR.

CONCLUSION

This 15-gene expression signature is an independent prognostic marker in early-stage, completely resected NSCLC, and to our knowledge, is the first signature that has demonstrated the potential to select patients with stage IB to II NSCLC most likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin/vinorelbine.

Poor prognostic factors in patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer according to the seventh edition TNM classification

BACKGROUND

This study investigated poor prognostic factors in patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to the seventh edition of the TNM classification.

METHODS

Between July 1992 and December 2004, 1,204 consecutive patients with stage I NSCLC diagnosed based on the sixth edition TNM classification underwent complete resection with systematic node dissection. Of these patients, 434 were reclassified as stage IB according to the seventh edition TNM classification. Univariate analyses were performed using the log-rank test to select prognostic factors. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for multivariate analyses to identify independent factors indicating an unfavorable prognosis.

RESULTS

On multivariate analyses, two variables were independent significant factors indicating an unfavorable prognosis: presence of intratumoral vascular invasion and presence of visceral pleural invasion. According to subgroup analyses combining these two risk factors, 5-year disease-specific survival probabilities were 93%, 83%, and 73% for patients with zero, one, or two risk factors, respectively. The 5-year disease-specific survival of patients without risk factors was not statistically different from that of patients with stage IA cancer. In addition, the 5-year disease-specific survival curve of patients with two risk factors lay beneath that of patients with T2b or T3N0M0, stage II cancer, and there were no statistically significant differences between them.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the presence of intratumoral vascular invasion and the presence of visceral pleural invasion as independent poor prognostic factors in patients with stage IB NSCLC. When these two factors are combined, higher- and lower-risk subgroups can be identified, which will help to personalize adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: current and future directions

The cornerstone of treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has long been surgical resection. Over the past few years, there has been a paradigm shift to provide adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with completely resected stage II-IIIA NSCLC founded on large randomized clinical trials demonstrating longer overall survival with this treatment. Reassuringly, the National Cancer Institute of Canada Cancer Therapeutics Group JBR.10 trial recently reported a continued survival advantage for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after >9 years of median follow-up. In contrast, the gains from using this approach for stage IB disease are less clear, although data from an unplanned subgroup analysis suggest benefit for patients with tumors > or = 4 cm. Herein, we review the evidence supporting adjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC patients before discussing key mitigating factors in providing treatment, such as stage of disease and the impact of the new seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification system. Criteria such as patient age and performance status, as well as the value of appropriate chemotherapy selection, are highlighted as measures to help guide management. The role of postoperative radiotherapy and the future landscape of early-stage NSCLC research are also explored; namely, therapeutic strategies exploiting pharmacogenomic and gene-expression profiling, in an attempt to personalize care, and the integration of novel targeted therapies into adjuvant clinical trials.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in lung cancer: current status and future perspectives

Primary lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in most industrialized countries, and it is important to detect and control metastases distant from the lungs for improvement of a patient's prognosis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are tumor cells that are shed from the primary site and circulate in the peripheral blood, and recent studies have shown that CTCs can be useful clinical markers in some solid tumors such as those of breast cancer. In primary lung cancer, the clinical significance of CTCs remains unclear, but some promising results have been recently reported. Here, we reviewed the current status and future perspectives of CTCs in primary lung cancer.

Adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based outcomes study

PURPOSE

Since 2004, several clinical trials have demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) improves survival in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we evaluate the uptake of ACT and its impact on outcomes in the general population of Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with NSCLC in Ontario from 2001 to 2006 who underwent surgical resection (n = 6,304) were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. We linked electronic records of treatment to the registry. We described uptake of ACT and compared survival of all patients with surgically resected NSCLC diagnosed from 2001 to 2003 with patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2006. As a proxy measure of ACT-related toxicity, we evaluated hospitalizations within 6 months of surgery.

RESULTS

Demographic, disease, and treatment-related characteristics did not differ between the 2001 to 2003 and 2004 to 2006 study cohorts. Over the study period, the proportion of patients receiving ACT increased from 7% (192 of 2,950 patients) to 31% (1,032 of 3,354 patients; P < .001). The proportion of patients admitted to hospital within 6 months of surgery remained stable and (36% in the 2001 to 2003 cohort and 37% in the 2004 to 2006 cohort). However, within 2 years of surgery, there was a 33% reduction in the proportion of patients admitted to hospital with metastatic disease (P < .001). During the study period, there was a substantial improvement in 4-year survival among surgically resected patients, from 52.5% (2001 to 2003) to 56.1% (2004 to 2006; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

There has been a rapid uptake of ACT for NSCLC, which was not associated with an increased rate of hospitalization. The adoption of ACT was associated with a substantial improvement in overall survival, suggesting that the benefits seen in clinical trials are generalizable to the general population.

A critical appraisal of the adjuvant chemotherapy guidelines for patients with completely resected T3N0 non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A Joint Expert Panel recently published guidelines for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, recommending routine use in patients with completely resected stage II (T1-2N1 and T3N0) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, these two tumor subgroups should be considered as different entities. While the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy has been established in patients with T1-2N1 NSCLC, its benefit in patients with T3N0 tumor remains questionable.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed an extensive review of the literature using the Joint Expert Panel guidelines as a start point. Altogether, we identified 76 potentially relevant articles. Basing on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 of the 76 articles were eventually included in this review.

RESULTS

After careful evaluation of the selected articles, we found no information on the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T3N0 NSCLC.

DISCUSSION

In the absence of evidence-based data, we recommend that the lack of information on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for T3N0 tumors be discussed with patients and propose chemotherapy as an individual option. While the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy will be difficult to assess prospectively through a large randomized clinical trial, a pooled-analysis of the existing data would quickly and with a limited effort provide a preliminary answer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Many randomised controlled trials have investigated the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in operable non-small-cell lung cancer. We undertook two comprehensive systematic reviews and meta-analyses to establish the effects of adding adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery, or to surgery plus radiotherapy.

METHODS

We included randomised trials, not confounded by additional therapeutic differences between the two groups and that started randomisation on or after Jan 1, 1965, which compared surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone, or surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy. Updated individual patient data were collected, checked, and included in meta-analyses stratified by trial. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation until death by any cause. All analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

The first meta-analysis of surgery plus chemotherapy versus surgery alone was based on 34 trial comparisons and 8447 patients (3323 deaths). We recorded a benefit of adding chemotherapy after surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92, p<0.0001), with an absolute increase in survival of 4% (95% CI 3-6) at 5 years (from 60% to 64%). The second meta-analysis of surgery plus radiotherapy and chemotherapy versus surgery plus radiotherapy was based on 13 trial comparisons and 2660 patients (1909 deaths). We recorded a benefit of adding chemotherapy to surgery plus radiotherapy (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, p=0.009), representing an absolute improvement in survival of 4% (95% CI 1-8) at 5 years (from 29% to 33%). In both meta-analyses we noted little variation in effect according to the type of chemotherapy, other trial characteristics, or patient subgroup.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer improves survival, irrespective of whether chemotherapy was adjuvant to surgery alone or adjuvant to surgery plus radiotherapy.

FUNDING

UK Medical Research Council, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (AOM 05 209), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Sanofi-Aventis.

Prognostic significance of intratumoral blood vessel invasion in pathologic stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The 5-year survival rate of pathologic stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is excellent; however, up to 10% of patients with pathologic stage IA NSCLC still relapse postoperatively and die. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic features of patients with pathologic stage IA NSCLC to identify the prognostic factors and investigate the effect of a combination of intratumoral vessel invasion and tumor size.

METHODS

From December 1991 to December 2003, 217 consecutive patients with stage IA NSCLC were selected, and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed.

RESULTS

Intratumoral blood vessel invasion (BVI) was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor (p = 0.0006). The relative risk for patients with BVI was 4.599 times higher than that for patients without BVI (95% confidence interval, 1.913 to 11.056). According to the new T N M system, the difference in DFS between the patients with and without BVI was statistically significant, not only in tumors exceeding 2 cm (T1b with BVI vs T1b without BVI, p = 0.0020) but also in tumors smaller than 2 cm (T1a with BVI vs T1a without BVI, p < 0.0001). The survival curve of T1b patients without BVI was similar to that of T1a patients without BVI (p = 0.0892). Distant recurrence was frequently observed in both T1a and T1b patients with BVI.

CONCLUSIONS

BVI is an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with pathologic stage IA NSCLC. These T1a and T1b patients with BVI both might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Surgical management of non-small cell lung cancer with mediastinal lymphadenopathy

Several issues regarding the surgical management of N2 disease remain unresolved. First, the anatomical attribution of a mediastinal nodal station, especially in certain areas (i.e., azygos recess), is a source of continuous debate. Second, the presence of occult N2, single or multilevel N2, bulky N2, the skip phenomenon and the observation of a different prognostic outlook for specific mediastinal nodal stations are all elements of discussion that cannot clarify whether stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer is indeed a locally, albeit advanced, manifestation of the disease or the prodrome of an actual systemic dissemination. In this subset of patients lies the challenge for multidisciplinary treatment modalities, where the surgical role needs to be further defined in the context of an integrated collaborative effort with the medical oncologist and the radiotherapist.

The variation of prognostic significance of Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography in different histological subtypes and pathological stages of surgically resected Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Even if the prognostic role of SUVmax of 18-FDG-PET has been largely investigated, many issues regarding its relationship with pathologic staging and histological subtypes still remain controversial. This retrospective study investigated the prognostic significance of SUVmax in 119 completely resected, pathologically proven NSCLC. The SUVmax values resulted significantly related to histological subtypes (p<0.001), histological grading (p<0.001), and pathologic stage (p<0.001). The optimal cut-off value of SUVmax to predict prognosis in the whole series was 6.7 (p=0.029). 2-Year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 91% for SUVmax < or =6.7 and 55% for SUVmax >6.7 (p<0.001). SUVmax still remain a significant predictor of survival in Stage IB (2-year DSS of 100% for SUVmax < or =6.7; 51% for SUVmax >6.7, p=0.016). The optimal cut-off values of SUVmax to predict prognosis were 5 for adenocarcinoma (p=0.027) and 10.7 for other non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC subtypes (p=0.010). These histologic-specific cut-offs resulted significantly related to survival when stratified for stage: 2-year DSS for Stage IB adenocarcinoma were 100% for SUV< or =5 and 40% for SUVmax >5 (p=0.051); 2-year DSS for Stage IB non-adenocarcinoma were 83% for SUVmax < or =10.7 and 26% for SUVmax >10.7 (p=0.018). Adenocarcinomas showed significantly lower survival results respect to other NSCLC for intermediate SUVmax level (range 5.5-11.3) (p=0.021). High SUVmax resulted an independent negative prognostic factor at multivariate analysis (HR of 15.7, 95% CI of 2.50-98.44, p=0.003). In conclusion, SUVmax represents a significant prognostic factor in surgically resected NSCLC but a great variability between different histological subtypes, even when adjusted for stage, is present and could be considered when planning future trials on prognostic role of FDG uptake.