Specific pattern of RAS oncogene mutations in follicular thyroid tumors

Expression status and mutational analysis of the ras and B-raf genes in ovarian granulosa cell and epithelial tumors

OBJECTIVES

The molecular pathogenesis of granulosa cell tumors of the ovary (GCT) is not understood. Activating mutations in the K-, N-, and H-ras protooncogenes have been identified in a wide range of human cancers, including ovarian epithelial tumors. Furthermore, an apparent association has recently been reported between the presence of ras and B-raf mutations in the same cancer types. Activation of the ras/raf pathway would be predicted to be tumorigenic in granulosa cells.

METHODS

Gene expression patterns of the three ras and B-raf genes were determined in a panel of GCT and ovarian epithelial tumors, and in normal premenopausal ovaries. Expression was determined by RT-PCR using gene-specific primers combined with Southern blot analysis of the PCR products using gene-specific (32)P-labeled probes. Direct sequence analysis was used to screen for known activating mutations.

RESULTS

Widespread expression of the four genes was observed in all tumor types examined. Compared to the normal ovaries, none of the genes was expressed at significantly higher levels in any of the tumor types examined. A heterozygous point mutation in codon 12 of the K-ras gene was found in five of the 10 mucinous tumors. No B-raf mutations were detected in the mucinous tumors. No mutations were detected in any of the genes in the cohort of GCT.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that neither overexpression nor activating mutations of the ras or B-raf genes are associated with the development of GCT.

Selective occurrence of ras mutations in benign and malignant thyroid follicular neoplasms in Taiwan

Previous studies have demonstrated that point mutations in all three ras genes (H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras) may occur in thyroid neoplasia. However, the overall incidence of ras mutations in thyroid tumors and their frequency in specific histologic types varies widely in different series. Many earlier studies have chosen allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization approaches to examine ras mutations without further confirmation of the positive samples by DNA sequencing. In this study, mutational hot spots in exon 1 (codons 12/13) and exon 2 (codon 61) of the H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified and sequenced with an automatic sequencer. ras mutations were detected in 4 of 89 (4.5%) benign and malignant thyroid tumors. Three of 8 follicular carcinomas exhibited mutations in codon 61 of H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras, respectively, and mutation at codon 61 of N-ras was found in 1 of 12 follicular adenomas. No mutations were observed in the other tumors, which included 20 nodular goiters, 5 Hürthle cell adenomas, 42 papillary carcinomas, and 2 undifferentiated carcinomas. Our results, obtained by the direct sequencing technique, indicate a lower overall prevalence of ras oncogenes in thyroid tumors than reports in earlier series. However, the frequency of ras mutations in specific histotype of thyroid tumors and their exclusive involvement of codon 61 in our series are similar to those studies utilizing DNA sequencing to detect or to confirm ras gene alterations. The selective occurrence of ras mutations in benign and malignant follicular neoplasms indicates that ras gene alterations have a specific and early role in the development of follicular type of thyroid tumors in Taiwan.

BRAF T1796A transversion mutation in various thyroid neoplasms

A high prevalence of activating mutation of the B type Raf kinase (BRAF) gene was recently reported in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, the frequency of this mutation in several other types of thyroid neoplasms was not thoroughly investigated. In the present study, in addition to PTC, we evaluated various thyroid tumor types for the most common BRAF T1796A mutation by direct genomic DNA sequencing. We found a high and similar frequency (45%) of the BRAF T1796A mutation in two geographically distinct PTC patient populations: one composed of sporadic cases from North America, and the other from Kiev, Ukraine, that included individuals who were exposed to the Chernobyl nuclear accident. In contrast, we found BRAF mutation in only 20% of anaplastic thyroid cancers and no mutation in medullary thyroid cancers and benign thyroid hyperplasia. We also confirmed previous reports that the BRAF T1796A mutation did not occur in benign thyroid adenomas and follicular thyroid cancers. Specific analysis of the Ukraine patients with confirmed history of radiation exposure failed to show a higher incidence of BRAF mutation. Our results suggest that frequent occurrence of BRAF mutation is inherently associated with PTC, irrespective of geographic origin, and is apparently not a radiation-susceptible mutation. The lack or low prevalence of BRAF mutation in other thyroid neoplasms is consistent with the notion that other previously defined genetic alterations on the same signaling pathway are sufficient to cause tumorigenesis in most thyroid neoplasms.

Molecular events in follicular thyroid tumors

Knowledge of the molecular events that govern human thyroid tumorigenesis has grown considerably in the past ten years. Key genetic alterations and new oncogenic pathways have been identified. Molecular genetic aberrations in thyroid carcinomas bear noteworthy resemblance to those in acute myelogenous leukemias. Thyroid carcinomas and myeloid leukemias both possess transcription factor gene rearrangements-PPARgamma-related translocations in thyroid carcinoma and RARalpha-related and CBF-related translocations (amongst others) in myeloid leukemia. PPARgamma and RARalpha are closely related members ofthe same nuclear receptor subfamily, and the PML-RARalpha and PAX8-PPARgamma fusion proteins both function as dominant negative inhibitors of their wild-type parent proteins. Thyroid carcinomas and myeloid leukemias also both harbor NRAS mutations (15-25% of both cancers) and receptor tyrosine kinase mutations--RET mutations in thyroid carcinomas and FLT3 mutations in myeloid leukemias. The NRAS and tyrosine receptor kinase mutations are not observed in the same thyroid carcinoma or leukemia patients, suggesting that multiple initiating pathways exist in both. Lastly, thyroid carcinomas and myeloid leukemias possess p53 mutations at relatively low frequency (10-15%) in patients who tend to be older and have more aggressive, therapy resistant disease. Such parallels are unlikely to occur by chance alone and argue that common mechanisms underlie these diverse epithelial and hematologic cancers. The comparison of thyroid carcinomas and myeloid leukemias may highlight areas of thyroid cancer investigation worthy of further focus. For example, few collaborating mutations have been defined in thyroid carcinomas even though they play a clear role in myeloid leukemias, as exemplified by RARalpha rearrangements and FLT3 mutations that together dictate the promyleocytic leukemia phenotype. Functional interactions between collaborating mutations are possible at multiple levels, and it is tempting to speculate that some thyroid carcinomas might develop through an unique combination or co-activation of RET and RAS and/or RET and PPARgamma (and/or other) signaling systems. In fact, the ELE1-RET (PTC3) fusion protein contains the ELE1 nuclear receptor co-activator domain and it appears to physically associate with and inhibit wild-type PPARgamma in some papillary carcinomas. The similarities of the fusion proteins in thyroid carcinoma and myeloid leukemia suggest that a more directed search for fusion genes in non-thyroid carcinomas is warranted. In fact, novel fusion genes have been identified recently in aggressive midline, secretory breast, and renal cell carcinomas, although the epithelial nature of the latter is not well-documented. Interestingly, these cancers all tend to present more frequently in adolescence and young adulthood in a manner similar to thyroid and myeloid malignancies that have fusion genes. The analyses of cancers that present earlier in life may enhance fusion gene recognition in other carcinoma types. Definition and biologic characterization of the precursor cells that give rise to thyroid carcinoma will also be important. Myeloid leukemias are thought to arise from stem/progenitor cells that acquire disturbed self-renewal and differentiation capacities but retain characteristics of the myeloid lineages. Although the presence of comparable stem/progenitor cells in the thyroid are not defined, distinct thyroid cancer lineages and patterns of differentiation exist and candidate stem/progenitor cells such as the p63-immunoreactive solid cell nests are apparent. A last important area is development of molecular-based therapies for thyroid carcinoma patients resistant to standard radio-iodine treatment. Treatments for such cancers are limited and pathways defined by thyroid cancer mutations are prime targets for pharmacologic interventions with molecular inhibitors. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and nuclear receptor ligands have proven dramatically effective in some myeloid leukemia patients. Various molecular inhibitors are being investigated now in thyroid cancer models. Such developments predict that the thyroid cancer model will continue to provide biologic insights into human carcinoma biology and that improved pathologic diagnosis and treatment for thyroid cancer patients sit on the not too distant horizon.