A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children

[Pediatric acute spinal cord injury]

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric acute spinal cord injury is rare but is often associated with significant disability and prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU).

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to determine the epidemiology, initial clinical abnormalities, diagnostic studies, treatment and outcome of acute spinal cord injuries in a tertiary level pediatric hospital. A second objective was to analyze whether early tracheostomy allows earlier discharge of these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with acute spinal cord injuries admitted to our pediatric ICU since 1992 was performed.

RESULTS

We included 16 patients in the study, 12 of whom were boys (75 %). The patients were aged from birth to 19 years on admission to the ICU. The length of stay in the ICU was between 12 hours and 6 years. The cause of the lesion was birth trauma in four patients; one died and the remaining three live at home under mechanical ventilation. Traumatic injuries occurred in seven patients, two of whom died; a further two live in a long-term care facility and the remaining three live at home. Vascular spinal malformation occurred in two patients, and the three remaining injuries occurred during the acute postoperative period following spinal surgery. Of the 16 children, 56.2 % were tracheostomized and 83 % of the survivors live at home.

CONCLUSIONS

Early tracheostomy, the availability of invasive ventilation for home use and parent education permit earlier discharge of these patients and allow more of them to live at home.

Clearing the pediatric cervical spine following injury

Injury to the pediatric cervical spine is uncommon; however, a missed or delayed diagnosis can lead to disastrous consequences. Thus, following trauma, clearance of the pediatric cervical spine is important. Problematic issues include child compliance with examination, the complex anatomy of the pediatric cervical spine, lack of agreement on definitive imaging modalities, and the coordination of multiple medical specialties. Expediting clearance of the pediatric cervical spine requires an organized, multidisciplinary approach. In addition to systematic procedures within the emergency department, preventing missed and delayed diagnoses of cervical spine injury can be facilitated by applying a clear methodology for reviewing radiographs in conjunction with the child's clinical examination. This algorithm considers the adequacy of the images, alignment of the bony and soft-tissue elements, assessment of the cervical intervals, and the presence of abnormal angulation. Together with standard treatment, this protocol facilitates effective and expeditious clearance of the cervical spine.

Removal of C-spine protection by A&E triage nurses: a prospective trial of a clinical decision making instrument

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if triage nurses could safely apply a set of clinical criteria, removing hard collars and spinal boards at initial triage assessment.

METHODS

The Nexus clinical decision rules were applied by trained triage nurses to patients who attended the department with cervical collars and/or on spinal boards. Patients were excluded if they were felt to be in need of immediate medical assessment. Data were collected on the time to nursing assessment, time to medical assessment and time spent restrained. Patients were followed up until discharge and their radiological diagnosis confirmed. Hospital records were checked to ensure that no patients re-presented with injuries that had been missed at initial assessment.

RESULTS

In total, 112 patients were included in the study. Clinical criteria were met in 59 patients and their collar removed at triage assessment. For low risk patients, this reflects a mean reduction in time spent restrained of 23.3 minutes (p<0.005; 95% confidence interval 20.18 to 26.54). No patient who had a collar removed was found to have a significant injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple criteria can be applied by accident and emergency triage nurses to allow safe removal of cervical collars and spinal boards. The reduced time patients spent immobilised represents an important improvement in patient care.

Cervical spine trauma in children: a review

Injuries of the cervical spine are relatively rare in children but are a distinct clinical entity compared with those found in adults. The unique biomechanics of the pediatric cervical spine lead to a different distribution of injuries and distinct radiographic features. Children younger than 9 years of age usually have upper cervical injuries, whereas older children, whose biomechanics more closely resemble those of adults, are prone to lower cervical injuries. Pediatric cervical injuries are more frequently ligamentous in nature, and children are also more prone to spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality than adults are. Physical injuries are specific only to children. Radiographically benign findings, such as pseudosubluxation and synchondrosis, can be mistaken for traumatic injuries. External immobilization with a halo brace can be difficult and is associated with a high complication rate because of the thin calvaria in children. Surgical options have improved with the development of instrumentation specifically for children, but special considerations exist, such as the small size and growth potential of the pediatric spine.

Cervical spine clearance after trauma in children

Object

Currently, no diagnostic or procedural standards exist for clearing the cervical spine in children after trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine if reeducation of nonneurosurgical personnel and initiation of a new protocol based on the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study criteria could safely increase the number of pediatric cervical spines cleared of suspected injury without a neurosurgical consultation.

Methods

Data regarding cervical spine clearance in children (ages 0–18 years) after trauma protocol activation at Primary Children's Medical Center between 2001 and 2005 were collected and reviewed. Radiographic and clinical methods of clearing the cervical spine as well as the type and management of injuries were determined for two time frames: Period I (January 2001–December 2003) and Period II (January 2004–July 2005).

Between 2001 and 2003, 95% of 936 cervical spines were cleared of suspected injury by the neurosurgical service. Twenty-one ligamentous injuries (2.2%) and 12 fracture–dislocations (1.3%) were detected, with five patients requiring surgical stabilization (0.5%). Between January 2004 and July 2005, 507 (68%) of 746 cervical spines were cleared by nonneurosurgical personnel. Six ligamentous injuries (0.8%) and 10 fracture–dislocations (1.3%) were identified, with three patients (0.4%) requiring surgical stabilization. No late injuries were detected in either period.

Conclusions

The protocol used has been effective in enabling detection of cervical spine injuries in children after trauma, with the new protocol increasing by more than 60% the number of cervical spines cleared by nonneurosurgical personnel. Reeducation with establishment of the new protocols can safely facilitate clearance of the cervical spine by nonneurosurgical personnel after trauma.

Occipital condyle fractures: clinical presentation and imaging findings in 76 patients

The aim was to assess the frequency and type of occipital condyle fractures in patients with significant trauma, and determine the frequency in which conventional radiographic findings are positive. Secondarily, we subjectively evaluate the application of existing classification systems. Fracture of the occipital condyle is an uncommon lesion that may be associated with craniocervical instability. Relying on conventional radiographs to detect these injuries may be inappropriate. An institutional trauma database of patients was searched for patients with occipital condyle fractures. The types of fractures were classified retrospectively based on re-review of imaging studies, using existing classification systems. Frequency of types was calculated, and the ease of use of the fracture classifications was evaluated subjectively. Conventional radiographs were reviewed for the presence of subjective soft tissue swelling and the visibility of the fracture(s). Seventy-six patients had CT images available for re-review. None of the occipital condyle fractures could be identified in the 60 patients who had radiographs available for re-review. Because of the presence of life support tubing and pharyngeal fluid limiting evaluation of prevertebral soft tissue swelling, the presence of widened prevertebral soft tissues was only helpful in 7 of the 60 patients. The multiplanar reformatted CT images were useful to determine alignment at C0-C1 and C1-C2. Occipital condyle fractures were not visualized on conventional radiographs. Secondary findings of soft tissue swelling were often absent or unreliable. CT scanning with multiplanar reconstruction imaging plays an indispensable role in evaluating for fractures of the cervical spine, and for determining alignment at C0-C1-C2. The most recently developed classification system of Tuli et al. (Neurosurgery 41: 368-376, 1997) is useful, but suffers from the lack of a defined distinction between undisplaced (Type I, stable) and displaced (Type 2A, unstable) fracture fragments.

Cervical spine clearance: a review

Ethical concerns have hindered any randomised control blinded studies on the imaging required to assess the cervical spine in an unconscious trauma patient. The issue has been contentious for many years and has resulted in burgeoning but inconclusive guidance. MRI and multislice CT technology have made rapid advances, but the literature is slower to catch up. Never the less there appears to be an emerging consensus for the multiply injured patient. The rapid primary clinical survey should be followed by lateral cervical spine, chest and pelvic radiographs. If a patient is unconscious then CT of the brain and at least down to C3 (and in the USA down to D1) has now become routine. The cranio-cervical scans should be a maximum of 2 mm thickness, and probably less, as undisplaced type II peg fractures, can be invisible even on 1 mm slices with reconstructions. If the lateral cervical radiograph and the CT scan are negative, then MRI is the investigation of choice to exclude instability. Patients with focal neurological signs, evidence of cord or disc injury, and patients whose surgery require pre-operative cord assessment should be imaged by MRI. It is also the investigation of choice for evaluating the complications and late sequela of trauma. If the patient is to have an MRI scan, the MR unit must be able to at least do a sagittal STIR sequence of the entire vertebral column to exclude non-contiguous injuries, which, since the advent of MRI, are now known to be relatively common. Any areas of oedema or collapse then require detailed CT evaluation. It is important that cases are handled by a suitably skilled multidisciplinary team, and avoid repeat imaging due to technical inadequacies. The aim of this review is to re-examine the role of cervical spine imaging in the context of new guidelines and technical advances in imaging techniques.

Imaging of acute cervical spine injuries: review and outlook

Advances in imaging technology have been successfully applied in the emergency trauma setting with great benefit providing early, accurate and efficient diagnoses. Gaps in the knowledge of imaging acute spinal injury remain, despite a vast wealth of useful research and publications on the role of CT and MRI. This article reviews in a balanced manner the main questions that still face the attending radiologist by embracing the current and evolving concepts to help define and provide answers to the following; Imaging techniques -- strengths and weaknesses; what are the implications of a missed cervical spine injury?; who should be imaged?; how should they be imaged?; spinal immobilisation -- help or hazard?; residual open questions; what does all this mean?; and what are the implications for the radiologist? Although there are many helpful guidelines, the residual gaps in the knowledge base result in incomplete answers to the questions posed. The identification of these gaps in knowledge however should act as the initiating stimulus for further research. All too often there is a danger that the performance and productivity of the imaging modalities is the main research focus and not enough attention is given to the two fundamental prerequisites to the assessment of any imaging technology -- the clinical selection criteria for imaging and the level of expertise of the appropriate clinician interpreting the images.

Spinal injuries in children

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Traumatic spinal injury (TSI) is an uncommon source of morbidity and mortality in children. The aim of this study was to describe childhood TSI in a single level 1 urban pediatric trauma center.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed all children younger than 14 years with TSI, treated at a level I pediatric trauma center between 1991 and 2002 (n = 406, 4% total registry). All children were stratified according to demographics, mechanisms, type and level of injury, radiologic evaluations, associated injuries, and mortality.

RESULTS

The mean age was 9.48 +/- 3.81 years. The most common overall mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash (MVC; 29%) and ranked highest for infants. Falls ranked highest for ages 2 to 9 years. Sports ranked highest in the 10 to 14 year age group. Paravertebral soft tissue injuries were 68%. The most common injury level was the high cervical spine (O-C4). The incidence of spinal cord injury without radiologic abnormality (SCIWORA) was 6%. Traumatic brain injury (37%) was the most common associated injury. Overall mortality rate was 4% in this urban catchment.

CONCLUSIONS

TSI in children requires a different preventive and therapeutic logarithm compared with that of adults. The potential devastating nature of TSI warrants that the health care team always maintains a high index of suspicion for injury. Future prospective studies are needed to further elucidate injury patterns.

Occult trauma in high-risk populations

Several groups of patients are at increased risk for traumatic injury that is "occult," or not apparent on initial presentation. Perhaps the most notorious are those who abuse alcohol, but other groups include the elderly, coagulopathic, those with neurological disease, and the mentally ill. Moreover, traumatic injury can coexist with (or be masked by) medical pathology, resulting in the disposition of injured patients to nonsurgical services where surveillance for traumatic injury diminishes. Because delays or failures in diagnosis might result in unnecessary pain, morbidity, and mortality, it is important for the emergency physician to identify occult presentations of trauma before disposition. This review highlights commonly missed traumatic injuries in adult patients.

Evidence-based imaging evaluation of the cervical spine in trauma

Despite the relatively low frequency of cervical spine fractures in trauma patients, tremendous resources are expended on the use of imaging to exclude fracture. Some level 2 evidence can direct the selection of subjects for imaging and optimization of the imaging strategy. A suggested algorithm for evidence-based cervical spine imaging is shown in Fig. 1. This algorithm is based on the sequential assessment of two questions: (1) Is imaging necessary? (2) If imaging is necessary, what is the optimal strategy? The NEXUS and the Canadian cervical spine prediction rule investigations are large methodologically sound observational studies of clinical indications for cervical spine imaging that have addressed the question of who should undergo imaging. The results of these studies indicate that simple clinical criteria can be used to exclude fracture safely without imaging in many low-risk subjects. Data from these studies suggest that the implementation of such prediction rules into practice may reduce unnecessary imaging, although more research is necessary to document the actual effects. In subjects in whom imaging is indicated, cost-effectiveness analysis can be performed to determine the optimal imaging strategy. For high-risk subjects, cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that CT is the preferred initial strategy. When compared with radiography, the higher short-term costs of CT are counter-balanced by the decreased need for further imaging in patients without injury and by the increased sensitivity for fracture. The high-risk cervical spine criteria used at the author's center seem to be valid for identifying appropriate patients for initial imaging with CT.

Clinical Predictors for the Selective Use of Chest Radiographs in Pediatric Blunt Trauma Evaluations

BACKGROUND

Chest radiographs continue to be a routine part of the evaluation of children sustaining blunt trauma. This study sought to determine those clinical markers associated with an abnormal chest radiograph in nonintubated, pediatric, blunt trauma victims.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed for severely injured pediatric trauma patients presenting to our emergency department between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1997. Abnormal chest radiographs were identified through the trauma registry and four controls were matched to each case. Radiographs were reevaluated by our study radiologist. Variables associated with an abnormal chest radiograph were grouped to develop a set of clinical markers that could predict an abnormal chest radiograph with a high degree of sensitivity.

RESULTS

An initial chest radiograph was obtained in 457 of 587 trauma patients. Thirty study patients with an abnormal radiograph that met inclusion criteria were analyzed with 133 controls. The presence of either an abnormal respiratory rate for age, chest tenderness, or back abrasions had a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.0) and a specificity of 0.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.47).

CONCLUSION

In pediatric trauma patients, the presence of chest tenderness, back abrasions, or an abnormal respiratory rate identified all abnormal chest radiographs.

The usefulness of a modified adult protocol for the clearance of paediatric cervical spine injury in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the use of a modified adult protocol that uses cervical spine imaging on presentation for the assessment of cervical spine injury in children improves clinical outcome.

METHODS

This is a case series study on all consecutive trauma patients presenting from April to July 2000 inclusive to the ED of a major paediatric trauma hospital. Children presenting to the ED with potential cervical spine injury (CSI) were identified using standard selection criteria. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, method and time of presentation, associated injuries, radiological investigation and clinical outcome were recorded. The major outcome measures for this study were: time to clearance of the cervical spine, length of stay in the ED and admission to an in-hospital bed. Data were analysed for compliance to the protocol, this being the standard assessment pathway of cervical spine clearance used by our trauma service.

RESULTS

The trauma registry identified 1721 trauma presentations during the 4-month study period; 208 presentations representing 200 children with potential CSI were entered into the study. Males represented 72.5% of the study population, having a mean age of 8.32 years, although 29% were less than 5 years of age. The majority of presentations (69%) occurred outside of normal working hours. In 17.8% of cases the cervical spine was cleared based on clinical assessment alone, half less than 5 years of age. Compliance to the protocol occurred in 78% of presentations. However, when examined by age group, children 5 years of age or above were 1.5 times more likely to comply with the protocol as compared with younger children. Adequate plain imaging was not obtained in 18% of presentations, this group almost exclusively less than 5 years of age. There were no missed injuries and no short or long-term neurological sequelae reported during this study. There were no differences in time to clearance, length of stay and admission rate between compliant and non-compliant groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified adult protocols for cervical spine clearance offer guidance in managing the majority of children suffering blunt trauma. However, we recommend caution in rigidly applying such protocols, especially to children of young age.

A multidisciplinary approach to the development of a cervical spine clearance protocol: process, rationale, and initial results

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Assessment of potential spine injuries is inconsistent and controversial. Subsequent morbidity includes prolonged immobilization and missed injuries. To address these issues, a multidisciplinary team was organized to design a cervical spine management/clearance pathway. The process, algorithm, and initial results are described.

METHODS

Team members consisted of pediatric surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, emergency room physicians, and trauma nurse practitioners. Nationwide standards, guidelines, and experiences across disciplines were reviewed, and a consensus pathway evolved for cervical spine clearance in children 8 years and younger. A short-term retrospective review (5 months) was performed to assess initial performance. Time required for clearance, number and type of imaging studies, and number of missed injuries were compared between a group of patients before (n = 71) and after (n = 56) the implementation of the pathway.

RESULTS

Strict guidelines for cervical spine immobilization and clearance criteria were defined. After implementation of this pathway, time required for cervical clearance in nonintubated children decreased (before, 12.3 +/- 1.5 v after, 7.5 +/- 0.9 hours; P =.014). A clear trend toward earlier clearance in intubated patients existed (before [n = 6], 40.0 +/- 16.8 v after [n = 6], 19.4 +/- 8.1 hours; P =.10); there need to be larger numbers to determine statistical significance. The 2 study groups were similar in age; mechanism of injury; Glasgow coma scale score; and number of plain x-rays, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging studies obtained. Neither group had missed injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

standards for cervical spine immobilization, assessment, and clearance. Implementation of such guidelines decreased time for cervical spine clearance, and ongoing analysis of sensitivity is encouraging.

Spinal cord injury

Pediatric spinal cord injury is a relatively uncommon problem, responsible for approximately 5% of all spinal cord injuries. Anatomic and behavioral differences between adults and children lead to variation in injury type and severity. Young children are more prone to high cervical injuries, with nearly 80% of injuries in children < 2 yrs old affecting this area. As the child approaches 8-10 yrs of age, the spinal anatomy and therefore injury pattern more closely approximates adult injuries. Although the prevalence of spine injuries is lower in children, clearing the spine becomes more complex due to radiographic differences and the inability to "clinically" clear the cervical spine in young children. In this article, the types of injuries seen in children are discussed, with an emphasis on acute management and clearance of the cervical spine. Treatment options and long-term issues are also discussed.

Management of suspected cervical spine injuries--the paediatric perspective

Paediatric cervical spine immobilisation and management is one of the most difficult tasks to master in the paediatric trauma population. The Royal Children's Hospital--Melbourne has admitted 54 patients with diagnosed cervical spine injuries since January 1999. The management of such patients admitted to acute care facilities with suspected cervical spine injuries is inconsistent and at times sub-optimal. Management controversies centre around, application of cervical collars, clearance of the c-spine, patient movement and general care principles. In an endeavour to address these issues, the Royal Children's Hospital Trauma Service, in conjunction with the Emergency Department developed cervical spine guidelines. Teams consulted in the formulation of these guidelines included, Emergency Department, Intensive Care Unit, Orthopaedics, Neurosurgery, Radiology and General Surgery. These guidelines were developed as a clinical tool to guide management and standardise the approach of care for these patients. Specifically, the guidelines address: immobilisation of the paediatric cervical spine; radiology; clearing the cervical spine of injury; suspected or proven cervical spine injury; guidelines for times to fitting Philadelphia collar; ongoing care.

Spinal injuries

The pre-hospital care of patients with suspected spinal injuries involves early immobilisation of the whole spine and the institution of measures to prevent secondary injury from hypoxia, hypoperfusion or further mechanical disruption. Early ventilation and differentiation of haemorrhagic from neurogenic shock are the key elements of pre-hospital resuscitation specific to spinal injuries. Falls from a significant height, high-impact speed road accidents, blast injuries, direct blunt or penetrating injuries near the spine and other high energy injuries should all be regarded as high risk for spinal injury but clinical examination should determine whether the patient requires full, limited or no spinal immobilisation. Although there is little conclusive evidence in the literature that supports pre-hospital clinical clearance of the spine, the similarities between pre-hospital immobilisation decisions and in-hospital radiography decisions are such that it is likely that clinical clearance will be effective for selected patients. This decision can be made at the scene provided the patient has no evidence of: Altered level of consciousness or mental status Intoxication Neurological symptoms or signs A distracting painful injury (e.g. chest injuries, long bone fracture) Midline spinal pain or tenderness. Where there is evidence to support spinal immobilisation, then the full range of devices and techniques should be considered. In the remote or operational environment where pre-hospital times are prolonged, full immobilisation, analgesia and re-assessment may allow localisation of the injury and a reduction in the degree of immobilisation. Common reasons for missing significant spinal injuries include failing to consider the possibility of spinal injuries in patients who are either unconscious, intoxicated or uncooperative (54,55). The application of the decision rule discussed here will ensure that no clinically significant spinal injuries are missed in pre-hospital care.

Management of pediatric cervical spine and spinal cord injuries

DIAGNOSTIC

STANDARDS

There is insufficient evidence to support diagnostic standards.

GUIDELINES

In children who have experienced trauma and are alert, conversant, have no neurological deficit, no midline cervical tenderness, and no painful distracting injury, and are not intoxicated, cervical spine x-rays are not necessary to exclude cervical spine injury and are not recommended. In children who have experienced trauma and who are either not alert, nonconversant, or have neurological deficit, midline cervical tenderness, or painful distracting injury, or are intoxicated, it is recommended that anteroposterior and lateral cervical spine x-rays be obtained.

OPTIONS

In children younger than age 9 years who have experienced trauma, and who are nonconversant or have an altered mental status, a neurological deficit, neck pain, or a painful distracting injury, are intoxicated, or have unexplained hypotension, it is recommended that anteroposterior and lateral cervical spine x-rays be obtained. In children age 9 years or older who have experienced trauma, and who are nonconversant or have an altered mental status, a neurological deficit, neck pain, or a painful distracting injury, are intoxicated, or have unexplained hypotension, it is recommended that anteroposterior, lateral, and open-mouth cervical spine x-rays be obtained. Computed tomographic scanning with attention to the suspected level of neurological injury to exclude occult fractures or to evaluate regions not seen adequately on plain x-rays is recommended. Flexion/extension cervical x-rays or fluoroscopy may be considered to exclude gross ligamentous instability when there remains a suspicion of cervical spine instability after static x-rays are obtained. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine may be considered to exclude cord or nerve root compression, evaluate ligamentous integrity, or provide information regarding neurological prognosis.

TREATMENT

STANDARDS

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards.

GUIDELINES

There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines.

OPTIONS

Thoracic elevation or an occipital recess to prevent flexion of the head and neck when restrained supine on an otherwise flat backboard may allow for better neutral alignment and immobilization of the cervical spine in children younger than 8 years because of the relatively large head in these younger children and is recommended. Closed reduction and halo immobilization for injuries of the C2 synchondrosis between the body and odontoid is recommended in children younger than 7 years. Consideration of primary operative therapy is recommended for isolated ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine with associated deformity.